The City of Frederick

Similar documents
Plan Overview. Manhattan Area 2035 Reflections and Progress. Chapter 1: Introduction. Background

CITY OF PUYALLUP. Background. Development Services

CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA

Branch Avenue Corridor

John M. Fleming Managing Director, Planning and City Planner. Old East Village Dundas Street Corridor Secondary Plan Draft Terms of Reference

Planning Commission April 4, 2013 BOCC Workshop Page 1

Implementation Guide Comprehensive Plan City of Allen

1.0 Purpose of a Secondary Plan for the Masonville Transit Village

Executive Summary. NY 7 / NY 2 Corridor

IMPLEMENTING SOMERSET COUNTY S INVESTMENT FRAMEWORK

Introduction. Chapter 1. Purpose of the Comprehensive Plan Plan Organization Planning Process & Community Input 1-1

FOUR MILE RUN VALLEY WORKING GROUP AND CHARGE

2040 LUP is a part of the Comprehensive Plan and carries the same legal authority. Economic Challenges

Living in Albemarle County s Urban Places

CITY S GOALS DRIVE MODE CHOICE IN WINSTON-SALEM, NC

S C O P E O F W O R K A P R I L

Public input has been an important part of the plan development process.

A BLUEPRINT FOR BROCKTON A CITY-WIDE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

North Fair Oaks Community Plan Summary and Information

Port Credit Local Advisory Panel October 20 th Meeting

A. WHAT IS A GENERAL PLAN?

Planning Commission Special Workshop. October 25, 2018

Chapter 1.0 Introduction

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRAFT CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Sheridan Boulevard S TAT I O N A R E A P L A N S H E R I D A N B O U L E VA R D S TAT I O N A R E A P L A N

WAC #7 3/14/14. Coachella General Plan Update

City Center Specific Plan Amendments And Background Report City of Richmond. PLANNING COMMISION FINAL DRAFT January, 2001

Purpose of the Master Plan

Laberge Group. Town of Coeymans. Draft Comprehensive Plan. Overview of Planning Process

3. VISION AND GOALS. Vision Statement. Goals, Objectives and Policies

Urban Development Area (UDA) Process in Virginia: History & Requirements

Economic Development & Housing Council Committee Comprehensive Plan Update September 20, 2005

SUBJECT: GO Station Mobility Hubs Preferred Concepts: Aldershot GO, Burlington GO and Appleby GO. Planning and Development Committee - Public Meeting

Streets for People, Place-Making and Prosperity. #TOcompletestreets

Proposed Comprehensive Plan Strategies DRAFT for discussion June 28, 2017

Planned Manufacturing District Review

IH35 Corridor Plan Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan

Danvers High Street I-1 District Study

This chapter describes the purpose of the Plan, introduces how the Plan is organized and provides contextual background for the Plan.

PROJECT BACKGROUND. Preliminary Design Scope and Tasks

Citizen Advisory Group Meeting 5: Land Use April 14, 2011

PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA TRANSIT DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND TRANSIT DISTRICT OVERLAY ZONE UPDATE

Preliminary Port Towns Sector Plan and Proposed Sectional Map Amendment March 2009

DRAFT Amsterdam/Churchill Community Plan (4/17/08) Adopted By the Gallatin County Commission

CITY OF ANN ARBOR MASTER PLAN. Land Use Element

JANUARY 19, 2011 CENTRAL AVENUE-METRO BLUE LINE TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT COMMUNITY FORUM

Land Use. Hardware Street Vendor Mixed-Use

Scope of Services. River Oaks Boulevard (SH 183) Corridor Master Plan

Section 4 BUILDING THE MASTER PLAN

Parks Master Plan Implementation: Phase I Waterfront Use and Design REPORT #: September 7, 2016 File #

City of Farmington. Downtown Plan. Amendment to the 1998 Master Plan Adopted October 11, 2004

BUDGETING FOR OUTCOMES TRINITY RIVER CORRIDOR

FOUR MILE RUN VALLEY WORKING GROUP AND CHARGE Adopted April 16, 2016 Amended July 19, 2016

SAN RAFAEL GENERAL PLAN 2040 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW

NEW REGIONAL OFFICIAL PLAN HIGH LEVEL PROCESS & FRAMEWORK

IH35 Corridor Plan Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan

NORTH CLAYMONT AREA MASTER PLAN COMMUNITY WORKSHOP #1 FEBRUARY 3, 2016

Request for Proposals: Architectural/Design Guidelines

Isabel Neighborhood Plan: Alternatives

Wadsworth Boulevard S TAT I O N A R E A P L A N

CHAPTER 1. Ms. Guajardo s Class - Central Elementary CH 1 1

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Land Use & Infrastructure Master Plan City of Orlando Council Work Session

Date: April 10, 2017 City Council Work Session April 24, 2017: Status Report on the Comprehensive Plan Update and Transportation Master Plan

Town Center (part of the Comprehensive Plan)

7Page 1 CLEMMONS COMMUNITY COMPASS 1 PLAN OVERVIEW

1.0 Introduction. Purpose and Basis for Updating the TMP. Introduction 1

Kinzie Industrial Corridor

Lesson 6. Corridor Planning

State Highway 5 Corridor Context Sensitive Master Plan

Kinzie Industrial Corridor

TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT POLICY DRAFT. City Planning and Development Department Kansas City, Missouri

10 Implementation. Implementation. Responsibility for Implementation. Blueprint for Bloomsburg. Town of Bloomsburg Comprehensive Plan 10-1

Harlem Avenue Corridor Plan: Corridor Planning Across Municipal Boundaries

Chairman and Members of the Planning and Development Committee. Thomas S. Mokrzycki, Commissioner of Planning and Building

Purpose of the Master Plan

1 October Dear Citizens of Charlotte and Mecklenburg County,

Transit / Housing Oriented Redevelopment

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JUNE 7, 2016

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS

TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

TOWN OF NEW CASTLE - Master Plan Update

12/9/2013. HOLLYWOOD/PINES CORRIDOR PROJECT AMPO 2013 Annual Conference October 24, Our Perspective. Broward.

Staff Report and Recommendation

DRAFT. Urban Development Areas Fairfax County. UDA Needs Profile: Tysons Corner 13% Location Characteristics. Socio-Economic Characteristics

Downtown Streetscape Manual & Built Form Standards

PLANNING COORDINATING COMMITTEE

TOWN COUNCIL / PLANNING COMMISSION

4.1.3 LAND USE CATEGORIES

Project Profile BAR HARBOR

Chapter 1: Introduction

CHAPTER 7: VISION AND ACTION STATEMENTS. Noble 2025 Vision Statement

DOMINION BOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN A MODEL FOR CHESAPEAKE S FUTURE

Chair and Members of the Planning, Public Works and Transportation Committee. Tara Buonpensiero, Senior Planner Policy, MCIP, RPP

ITEM #8. Regional Smart Growth Program. Regional Smart Growth Program. Presentation Overview. Coast Highway Vision and Stategic Plan.

General Plans. Tom Dansie, AICP Steve Pastorik, AICP

master plan of highways bus rapid transit amendment

Broken Arrow Comprehensive Plan Update Public Workshop Meeting #3 January 23,

Animating the Rideau Canal December 2013

Transportation Working Team Duane Diggs, Co-Chair (VOICE Buffalo) Kelly Dixon, Co-Chair (GBNRTC) Paul Ray, Facilitator (UB Regional Institute)

Transcription:

Z OOR <H The City of Frederick G 5 JV UL Q 6S %O \ DF RF RQ 0 YG 2SRVVXPWRZ X, 5W " 0DUNHW 6W 6RXWK 6 W D \,, G RU G 5 J D V ) LFK 5H U IH $, X. -H W 6 RQ V U IIH, I -H UIO \ / Q &K 6W K 3DWULFN 6W 8V, WWH 8V %X F XU %HQ \, D 3N Q VR W] 6 W (DVW 6W 0RWWHU $YH Q 3N 6W K YH W $ RQ QW YH 6H VHP 5R 8V *DV +RXVH 3N Guide to the Small Area Planning Process

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

Mayor and Board of Aldermen Randy McClement, Mayor Karen Young, President Pro Tem Michael O Conner Shelley Aloi Carol Krimm Kelly Russell Planning Commission Meta Nash, Chair Josh Bokee Billy Shreve Gary Brooks Steve Stoyke Produced By: The City of Frederick Planning Department 140 West Patrick Street Frederick, Maryland 21701 Telephone: 301.600.1499 Fax: 301.600.1837 www.cityoffrederick.com/departments/planning/planning.htm Joe Adkins, AICP, Deputy Director of Planning Nick Colonna, AICP, Division Manager of Comprehensive Planning Gabrielle Dunn, Division Manager of Development Review Steve Barney Planner Brandon Mark, Planner

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

Table of Contents I n t r o d u c t i o n 1 P l a n n i n g A r e a s 3 E x a m p l e O u t l i n e 5 G e n e r a l Ti m e l i n e 7

This Page Intentionally Left Blank vi City of Frederick

Introduction What is a Small Area Plan? A Small Area Plan is a neighborhood-level plan that addresses land use, transportation, and a variety of other topics. For each planning area, a committee of residents, property owners and business owners provide neighborhood recommendations to city planners and local officials, resulting in a plan that is adopted by the Mayor and Board of Aldermen. Ultimately, a goal of the Small Area Plan is to enhance the quality of life in each distinct community. Relationship to the City of Frederick Comprehensive Plan Small Area Plans assist in implementing the goals and recommendations of the City s Comprehensive Plan. Recognizing the unique character of the City s different communities, the 2010 Comprehensive Plan Update identified seven small planning areas and recommended that a separate, more detailed land use plan be completed for each of these areas. The City s Comprehensive Plan and the adopted Land Use Map are policy guides for the Small Area Plans. Benefits of Small Area Plans A key benefit of the Small Area Planning process is local stakeholder involvement in the development of each plan s recommendations. Small Area Plans serve as a guide for land use, environmental protection, transportation improvements, open space and other capital improvements, and will identify opportunities for commercial revitalization and, where appropriate, mixeduse development. Benefits of Small Area Plans: Represent the community s vision Reflect neighborhood stakeholders input Provide specific recommendations at a neighborhood level Offer increased efficiency in provision of public services Allow greater predictability in land use and development Enable neighborhoods to be proactive in making land use recommendations Identify priority neighborhood projects and possible resources for implementation Help to guide the investment decisions of local governments Planning Department 1

City of Frederick Small Area Planning Yellow Springs Rd Opossumtown Pk Monocacy Blvd Iu?Î Rt 26 Rosemont Ave Seventh St Us 15 Gas House Pk East St!"a$ I-70 Jefferson Pk K³ Butterfly Ln Iu Us 15 Iy A¹ Us 40 Jefferson St Iy I-270 0 1,050 2,100 4,200 6,300 Feet Note: This map is prepared solely for the purpose of illustrating the City of Frederick. It should be used for no other purpose. Data on this map was prepared from several original sources and is subject to change as source data changes. This map is not a legal document. Orthophotos produced 03/07 Maps produced by: mbowman 101 N Court St Frederick, MD 21701 P: 301-600-6209 F: 301-600-2233 www.cityoffrederick.com South St %&g( Bentz St Market St Patrick St!"a$ Church St Rt. 15 Corridor Thomas Johnson Corridor Jefferson Street Corridor Rosemont Corridor/ Ft. Detrick Area!"a$ Reichs Ford Rd I-70 Golden Mile/ US 40 Corridor Central Business District East Street Rising 2 City of Frederick

Planning Areas During the course of preparing the 2010 Comprehensive Plan Update, it was noted that several areas could benefit from a Small Area Plan. Each of these areas has its own unique character that should be protected and enhanced as new development or redevelopment takes place. Some of the potential area plan locations are listed below in addition to some of the major issues in these areas: East Frederick: East Frederick is a dynamic area with a wide variety of land uses. Including retail, office and residential uses (including some historic residential areas), as well as manufacturing, wholesale trade, and other industrial uses. The City s east side also includes the historic Frederick Fairgrounds, the Frederick Municipal Airport and the MARC commuter rail station. Preserving and supporting the current mix of land uses could be a central policy of an area plan. In addition, major corridors such as East Patrick Street and East Street present vital development and redevelopment opportunities for the area. Golden Mile/US 40 Corridor: The Golden Mile / US 40 Corridor includes a significant amount of commercial development serving nearly 65,000 people within a three-mile radius. However, the corridor is characterized by a lack of connectivity between commercial uses, which discourages pedestrian access between neighborhoods and adjacent commercial areas. The primary challenges in the revitalization of the Golden Mile are existing street design and right-of-way dimensions. The Golden Mile, in its current form, is a typical first-generation suburban street primarily designed to serve motorists. Development along this corridor is characterized by strip-center shopping areas, surface parking lots, and an excessive number of points of access from West Patrick Street. A significant challenge for an area plan for the Golden Mile would be to transform the corridor into a street type that can serve users of all travel modes, including pedestrians, bicycles, and transit. Jefferson Street Corridor: The Jefferson Street corridor serves a dual role as a principal transportation corridor and as a concentrated commercial area serving adjacent neighborhoods. A principal goal for this area plan could be to provide opportunities for redevelopment in key areas and to provide a defining character for the area. Opossumtown Pike/Thomas Johnson Drive: The Opossumtown Pike/Thomas Johnson Drive area includes a broad mix of residential, office, commercial, and medical uses that serve area residents as well as the Fort Detrick Planning Department 3

community. Similar to the Jefferson Street Corridor, key goals for this area could be to foster improved levels of redevelopment in key areas, provide a defining character for the area, and improve traffic flow while maintaining pedestrian connectivity. Rosemont Avenue Corridor/Fort Detrick Area: The Rosemont Avenue corridor/fort Detrick area is contains several large institutional sites surrounded by arterial roadways serving commercial businesses and established neighborhoods. A significant goal for this area could be the mitigation of the potential impact of future Fort Detrick expansions on the adjacent neighborhoods. Specifically, the area plan should address the traffic impacts generated on both 7th Street and Rosemont Avenue. Additionally, the potential expansions of both Frederick Memorial Hospital and Hood College will also affect adjacent neighborhoods. US 15 Corridor: As the main north-south road through Frederick, US 15 serves multiple roles by connecting the City s neighborhoods and commercial areas as well as providing a travel route for commuters. In 2009, the U.S. Department of Transportation designated an extensive portion of US 15 as part of the Journey Through Hallowed Ground National Scenic Byway a 180-mile corridor from Gettysburg, Pennsylvania through Frederick County, Maryland, to VA 231 and Monticello in Albemarle County, Virginia. The Frederick County portion of the newly designated byway is 38.5 miles. An important goal for this area could be to ensure that, as the City and the surrounding region grow, future development is compatible with the road s multiple roles and its historic designation. Design standards have the potential to play a centralized role in preserving the viewshed of the Cotoctin Mountains and surrounding farmlands. Central Business District: Frederick s Central Business District is a unique combination of residential and business uses, and contains the City s historic core. An important goal for this district is the enhancement of downtown s economic vitality through continued promotion of historic preservation, the arts, neighborhood amenities, and appropriate design. This area could also benefit from the establishment of regulations intended specifically for downtown districts, distinct from those regulations applicable to more suburban districts of the City. Additionally, residents and merchants alike have noted that economic development efforts should be focused on North Market Street (north of 4th Street), the area south of Patrick Street, and other areas, in order to achieve the same economic vitality as the central part of downtown. In addition to the seven areas identified in the City of Frederick Comprehensive Plan, other planning areas can be included in the Small Area Planning program as necessary. 4 City of Frederick

Small Area Plan Outline Example 1. Introduction This Section includes the vision for the planning area, describes the planning process, and summarizes the plan s recommendations and implementation strategy. 2. Background This Section describes the history and character of the planning area and provides a summary data profile of its existing conditions. 3. Recommendations This Section outlines the plan s recommendations, including Land Use and Zoning, Housing, Transporation, Historic Preservation, Environment, Parks, Neighborhood Services, and Economic Development. 4. Implementation Plan This Section includes the plan s Implementation Tracking Chart a prioritized list of the plan s action items that identifies which department is responsible for each item s implementation. It also lists items that will be funded through the Capital Improvements Program (CIP). 5. Appendix This Section contains supplemental information, such as neighborhood survey results, an outline of the planning process, a summary of other plans or studies relevant to the plan area, and a neighborhood data profile. Planning Department 5

Proposed Area Plan Phases Phase One: Inventory and Analysis A. Planning Area Profile - Develop profile of area including demographics, physical conditions, land use and zoning, and other information B. Technical Advisory Group (TAG) - Form Technical Advisory Group composed of representatives from City departments and external agencies C. Establish Boundaries and Initial Set of Issues - Discuss area issues and review proposed boundaries with Planning Commission, Mayor and Board of Aldermen, and area NAC(s) Phase Two: Plan Development A. Outreach - Inform residents, property owners, and business owners about the Area Planning process, using: mailings, flyers, press releases, City website, and City s NAC Coordinator. B. Community Forum 1 - Facilitate a community-wide kickoff meeting to introduce the Area Planning process, conduct a SWOT analysis, and develop a vision for the planning area C. Public Participation - Facilitate participatory workshops on Land Use, Transportation, Parks and Recreation, and/or other topics as needed D. Ongoing Review - Provide regular updates to Planning Commission, Mayor and Board of Aldermen, and Technical Advisory Group E. Draft Plan Development - Staff develops draft plan, including alternative land use scenarios, based on public input Phase Three: Review and Adoption A. Community Forum 2 - Facilitate a community-wide workshop to review the draft plan. B. Public Comment Period - Community stakeholders provide comments on the draft plan, through a variety of means (website, mail, etc.) C. Inter-Agency Review - City departments and external agencies review the draft plan and provide cost estimates for action items. D. Planning Commission Hearing - Planning Commission conducts a public hearing to review the plan and to make a recommendation to the Mayor and Board of Aldermen for plan adoption E. Mayor and Board of Aldermen Hearing Phase Four: Plan Implementation (Ongoing) A. Implementation tracking - Monitor completion status of Area Plan action items B. Land Use and Zoning Changes - Based on the Area Plan, amend the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map, implement zoning changes, amend Land Management Code as necessary C. CIP Coordination - Identify action items for funding via Capital Improvements Program D. Guidance Document - Use Area Plan as a reference document for proposed zoning changes, land use map amendments, transportation decisions, and other planning efforts E. Update Plan - As needed, recommend updates to the Area Plan. 6 City of Frederick

Timeline Example S m a l l A r e a P l a n n i n g P r o c e s s One Two Three Four Five Six Seven Eight Nine Ten O n g o i n g Phase One: Inventory + Analysis Phase Two: Plan Development Outreach Phase Three: Review + Adoption Public Participation Phase Four: Implementation Community Forum 1 Draft Plan Community Forum 2 Public Comment Period Planning Commission Hearing for Recommendation to Mayor and Board of Aldermen Mayor and Board of Aldermen Hearing for Adoption Mayor and Board of Aldermen Workshop Planning Commission Workshop Technical Advisory Group (TAG) Meeting Public Workshop Planning Department 7

The City of Frederick Planning Department 140 West Patrick Street Frederick, Maryland 21701 Telephone: 301.600.1499 Fax: 301.600.1837 www.cityoffrederick.com/departments/planning/planning.htm