Baseline Hillside Project Kick-Off Meetings. February 2009

Similar documents
City of Lafayette Study Session Staff Report Design Review Commission

CITY OF LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA

CITY OF PUYALLUP. Background. Development Services

Site Design (Table 2) Fact Sheet & Focus Questions:

MORAGA HILLSIDES AND RIDGELINES PROJECT

SITE PLAN AREA. Met Park 6 Site Area (122,368 sf) Met Park 4/5 The Bartlett. Met Park 3 The Acadia. Met Park 2 The Millennium.

City of Lafayette Staff Report

Quarterly Report & Code Evaluation

City of San Ramon. Zoning Ordinance. Adopted: October 27, Latest Revisions Effective: March 28, 2018

HALF MOON BAY LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM. d), JOHN M. St>NGER ASSOCIATES INC S.F.' CA EIOO VISUAL RESOURCES OVERLAY.

PIN Number 108B Assessor Parcel No. (APN) Map Reference M B Block 18 Lot 16 Arb (Lot Cut Reference) 1

PIN Number 154-5A

PIN Number 147A Assessor Parcel No. (APN) A. E. WINSTANLEY TRACT. Map Reference M B Area Planning Commission

City of Burlington. Official Plan Review. January 29, Public Consultation #3

City of Lafayette Study Session Staff Report Design Review Commission

PIN Number 112-5A Assessor Parcel No. (APN) SOMERVILLE PLACE. Map Reference M B 7-93

Notice of Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report and Scoping Meeting for the Canyon Lane Roadway Improvements Development Project

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT APRIL 7, 2016

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT NOVEMBER 15, 2012

Notice of Preparation and Notice of Public Scoping Meeting. At Dublin Project

Presentation of the Staff Draft. July 17, 2014 SSRVP Team, Area 3

Steering Committee Meeting

TO: CITY COUNCIL DATE: MARCH 23,2009

West Slope Neighborhood Design Guidelines. Kick-off Meeting February 5, 2015 Titlow Lodge 6:00 8:00 pm

PIN Number 108B Assessor Parcel No. (APN) RAFAEL AND ANDRES MACHADO TRACT. Map Reference M R 84-33/34 PT "UNNUMBERED LT"

CITY OF CYPRESS 5275 Orange Avenue Cypress, California (714) DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PERMIT PROCESS

GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS

PIN Number 189B Assessor Parcel No. (APN) Tract TR Map Reference M B /46. Neighborhood Council

PIN Number 102B Assessor Parcel No. (APN) Tract TR Map Reference M B /19. Census Tract #

EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

City Council Special Meeting AGENDA ITEM NO. C.

CHAPTER 1. Ms. Guajardo s Class - Central Elementary CH 1 1

SAN RAFAEL GENERAL PLAN 2040 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW

Essential Skills: Reading and Interpreting Maps and Plans

A. General Plan: Land Use, Growth Management and the Built Environment Element. d. Use visually unobtrusive building materials.

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS I. LAND USE AND PLANNING

Example Codes. City of Brentwood, Tennessee Brentwood Hillside Protection Overlay District Summary

RECOMMENDATION REPORT

PIN Number 144B Assessor Parcel No. (APN) Map Reference M B Area Planning Commission. Census Tract # 1908.

Venice Pumping Plant Dual Force Main Project Draft EIR

ORDINANCE NO N.S.

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT SEPTEMBER 1, 2016

The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Prince George's County Planning Department Development Review Division

CITY OF TORRANCE HISTORIC PRESERVATION ORDINANCE AND TORRANCE TRACT HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLAN. City Council Tuesday, December 5, 2017 PAGE & TURNBULL

OCEANSIDE DEVELOPER S CONFERENCE. 1. 9:30-10:30 a.m. Proposed hotel on a 12,000 sq. ft. site at the northeast corner of Topeka St. and Tremont St.

Future Five. Design/ Development Guidelines. January 2008 Amended June 08 per City Council motion

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS A. AESTHETICS

ORDINANCE NO. SECTION 1. This ordinance, due to its length and corresponding cost of

CITY OF SCANDIA ORDINANCE NO. 174

STREAM BUFFERS

CITY OF SANTA ROSA PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 11, 2016 APPLICANT FILE NUMBER MJP13-002

APPENDIX C: HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (prev. Ordinance #2008-1)

Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE

ADOPTED AT NOVEMBER 15, 2012 PACC MEETING

RESOLUTION NO

Zoning Technical Review Presented by Camiros. November 10, 2015

The Floyds Fork Area Study A Framework for Growth

RESEDA - WEST VAN NUYS COMMUNITY PLAN UPDATE WORKSHOP

Goal 1 To establish and follow land use patterns for the long-range development of the campus.

2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PASCO COUNTY, FLORIDA

CITY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF CITY PLANNING ZONING INFORMATION FILE Z.I. NO POTRERO CANYON

PIN Number 109-5A Assessor Parcel No. (APN) VAWTER OCEAN PARK TRACT BLOCKS B C & D

Policies and Code Intent Sections Related to Town Center

RECOMMENDATION REPORT

OCEAN BOULEVARD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (PD-5)

City of Lafayette Staff Report

Listening Sessions: Guiding Principles and Unified Development Code New Castle County, Delaware

PIN Number 126B Assessor Parcel No. (APN) CASTELLAMMARE Map Reference M B 113-3/8 Block 14 Lot 16 Arb (Lot Cut Reference)

Chapter OVERLAY DISTRICTS

Community Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS ACTIVITY LOG

City Council Presentation November 6, 2017

INTRODUCTION. 1.1 What is a General Plan? 1.2 Requirements for a General Plan. 1.3 Introduction to Monterey County

5.0 Historic Resource Survey

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (MASTER PLAN & UNIT PLAN)

SUBJECT: PREDEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW OF PROJECT LOCATED AT 2632 EAST WASHINGTON BOULEVARD ('ST. LUKE MEDICAL CENTER')

Ripley East. Sketch Plan Amendment No A Preliminary Plan No Site Plan No MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT

Authority of the General Plan

Mollers Lane, Leopold, Victoria Significant Landscape Overlay Re-assessment

PIN Number 121-5A Assessor Parcel No. (APN) NINTH STREET TRACT EXTENSION. Map Reference M R 55-89/90

PIN Number 135B Assessor Parcel No. (APN) Tract TR 5640 Map Reference M B 62-32

Syracuse Land Use & Development Plan A Component of the Comprehensive Plan

IV.B. VISUAL RESOURCES

ST. MARY S SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICT (SMSCD) AND DPW&T CONCEPT EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES AND CHECKLIST

A Context-Based Design Code for Pedestrian & Transit-Oriented Development RAIL~VOLUTION NOVEMBER 2006

URBAN DESIGN GOALS / POLICIES / MEASURES

Source: Albemarle County Community Development 2010

ORDINANCE NO. City of Bellingham City Attorney 210 Lottie Street Bellingham, Washington INFILL HOUSING ORDINANCE Page 1

Draft Gaviota Coast Plan Chapter 7: Visual Resources

BOARD~ ADJUSTMENTIDESIGN RE ~WBOARD PROJECT OVERVIEW

Future Proposed Development

ZIMAS PUBLIC Generalized Zoning 11/05/2017

CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU BILL., (2Q08) (ADMINISTRATION) A BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE

PIN Number 118-5A Assessor Parcel No. (APN) CITY LANDS OF LOS ANGELES Map Reference M R 2-504/505 PAT 3-64/65 PT "UNNUMBERED LT"

2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PASCO COUNTY, FLORIDA

Los Angeles City Planning Commission 200 N. Spring Street, Room 532, Los Angeles, California, 90012, (213)

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE ISSUES MEETING. January 21, 2010 City Hall Mitchell Room 6:00 pm 9:00 pm

CHAPTER 3 LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

City of Burlington. Official Plan Review. December 11, Working Committee Meeting

ESSENTIAL PUBLIC FACILITIES

Nob Hill Pipeline Improvements Project EIR

Transcription:

Baseline Hillside Project Kick-Off Meetings February 2009

Regional Topography With Community Plan Boundaries The darker the great, the steeper the slope

Purpose of Meeting Get everyone up to speed. Show public input received so far. Explain some of the issues raise. Obtain broader scope of early input. Help us establish scope of Baseline Hillside Project.

Where are we now?

Where Are We? Baseline Mansionization Ordinance Preliminary Research Phase Existing Specific Plans in Hillsides Hillside Area Definition Amendment Northeast Los Angeles Zone Change Ordinance The Oaks ICO (Hollywood Hills)

Baseline Mansionization Ordinance Adopted by City Council on May 6, 2008 Effective on June 29, 2008

Baseline Mansionization Ordinance Created separate method of calculating Residential Floor Area. Established new Baseline FARs for each Zone. Included 20% Area Bonus, incentive to break up mass of building or build using USGBC LEED For Homes Program. Encouraged varied roof lines by tying Building Height to Slope of Roof. Added two new Districts used to protect unique neighborhoods: Single-Story Height District Residential Floor Area Overlay District

Baseline Mansionization Ordinance Applies to over 300,000 properties zoned single-family. Excludes Hillside Areas and Coastal Zone. 77% of lots zoned R1; 39% are R1 and in the 5,000 & 6,000 sq-ft ranges. Over a third of properties have development potential between 2,500 3,500 sq-ft, or between 3,000 4,200 sq-ft when 20% Bonus utilized.

Result of BMO R1 Neighborhood (6,200 sq-ft Lots)

Result of BMO Previous Development Potential

Result of BMO Previous Development Potential

Result of BMO Development Potential After Baseline Mansionization Ordinance

Objectives Met The adopted ordinance addressed many concerns raised by communities: Prevent mansionization on citywide basis. Address problems in Code which contribute to large boxlike structures. Preserve scale of single-family neighborhoods. Tackle mass & bulk issues directly. Maximize design flexibility. Minimize looming factor. Slightly larger box built green. Balance individual property rights with needs of overall community.

Where Are We? Preliminary Research Phase Review of Existing Hillside Regulations & Boundaries Existing Hillside-Related Specific Plans Best Practices Other Jurisdictions Throughout California & Country Next Phase Review Variances & Other Deviations Review Public Input to Develop Hillside Objectives

Where Are We? Hillside-Related Specific Plans: Mulholland Scenic Parkway Hollywoodland Mount Washington/Glassell Park San Gabriel/Verdugo Mountains Coastal Bluffs

Where Are We? Revising Hillside Area Definition to be based on topography NOT street boundaries. Removing Hillside Area designation from lots which are clearly flat, leaving only true hillsides to address. Baseline Mansionization Ordinance will automatically apply to properties which will no longer have Hillside Area designation (unless within Coastal Zone boundary).

Northeast Los Angeles Ordinance Adopted by City Council on November 26, 2008 Effective on January 16, 2009 (Ordinance No. 180,403)

Northeast Los Angeles Ordinance Location

Northeast Los Angeles Ordinance Ordinance dealt with a variety of issues, but it s most significant changes were: FAR New Floor to Area Ratios based on topography/slopes. Height Use of slope to calculate overall height limit. Grading Limits on grading for hillside lots. Retaining Walls regulates height and length of walls to protect safety. Ridgeline Protection separate height limits on identified ridgelines.

The Oaks Interim Ordinance Adopted by City Council on April 9, 2008 Effective on May 31, 2008 (Ordinance No. 179,814)

The Oaks ICO Griffith Park

The Oaks ICO Temporary Solution: Ordinance established new Floor Area Ratios to limit size of structures. Based on Lot Size, using separate square-footage intervals (independent of Zone) to determine max size of home. Established minimum sized home of 1,600 sq-ft. Currently Working on Permanent Solution.

Public Input Received (Boards around the room, please review and place a sticker near the issues you deem most important)

Hillside Issues/Concerns Raised Neighborhood Character & Scale. Environmental Impacts of Hillside Development. Grading & Slope Stability. Landscaping & Open Space. Run-Off & Drainage. Infrastructure. Emergency Access. Project Review Process. Construction Activity. Miscellaneous

Review of Core Issues

What s Happening? Hillside Standards Not Applied to All Hillside Lots Currently Hillside Standards Applied Based on Street Improvement, Not Topography.

What s Happening? Not All Properties Are Created Equal Size & Scale FAR currently 3 times the Buildable Area (lot size minus setbacks). No distinction between Zones. No distinction between topographical differences.

What s Happening? Not All Properties Are Created Equal Size & Scale Max. Floor Area 35,100 sq-ft Max. Floor Area 35,100 sq-ft Max. Floor Area 35,100 sq-ft 15% Average Slope 45% Average Slope 66% Average Slope 3 Lots of Equal Size (75 X 200 15,000 sq-ft) with Different Topography

What s Happening? 15% Average Slope 66% Average Slope 45% Average Slope 3 Lots of Equal Size (75 X 200 15,000 sq-ft) with Different Topography

What s Happening? 15% Average Slope 66% Average Slope 45% Average Slope 3 Lots of Equal Size (75 X 200 15,000 sq-ft) with Different Topography

What s Happening? Not All Properties Are Created Equal Size & Scale Lot size alone is not the best method of determining an appropriately sized home. Physical site conditions, such as topography, needs to be taken into account.

Issues-Bulk, Height, Scale

Issues-Bulk, Height, Scale

Issues-Bulk, Height, Scale

Issues-Bulk, Height, Scale

What s Happening? Grading Limits, or Absence of Them Currently, there are no grading limits. Properties only limited to how much they can afford to grade, and how much they can haul out within their own time constraints.

What s Happening? Grading Limits, or Absence of Them

What s Happening? Grading Limits, or Absence of Them

What s Happening? Grading Limits, or Absence of Them

What s Happening? Grading Limits, or Absence of Them Recent Cut/Fill Proposal

What s Happening? Retaining Walls Current Retaining Wall Regulations Old Retaining Wall Regulations

Issues-Access

Issues-Access

Issues-Safety

Issues-Safety

Interconnected Relationships Size/Scale Size/Scale Infrastructure Bulk Landscaping Height Grading/Retaining Walls Lot Coverage Site Location

Interconnected Relationships Size/Scale Bulk Infrastructure Bulk Landscaping Height Grading/Retaining Walls Lot Coverage Site Location

Interconnected Relationships Size/Scale Height Infrastructure Bulk Landscaping Height Grading/Retaining Walls Lot Coverage Site Location

Interconnected Relationships Size/Scale Lot Coverage Infrastructure Bulk Landscaping Height Grading/Retaining Walls Lot Coverage Site Location

Interconnected Relationships Size/Scale Site Location Infrastructure Bulk Landscaping Height Grading/Retaining Walls Lot Coverage Site Location

Interconnected Relationships Size/Scale Grading/Retaining Walls Infrastructure Bulk Landscaping Height Grading/Retaining Walls Lot Coverage Site Location

Interconnected Relationships Size/Scale Landscaping Infrastructure Bulk Landscaping Height Grading/Retaining Walls Lot Coverage Site Location

Interconnected Relationships Size/Scale Infrastructure Infrastructure Bulk Landscaping Height Grading/Retaining Walls Lot Coverage Site Location

Interconnected Relationships Size/Scale Infrastructure Bulk Landscaping Height Grading/Retaining Walls Lot Coverage Site Location