Optiline Fan Array The optimum number of fans for every application The Optimum in Sound Energy Size Redundancy Reliability Energy Labs was before was cool
Introduction Energy Labs was the first manufacturer use AMCA rated fans in an array. Our + years of research and testing has resulted in day s Optiline Fan Array which offers the industry s best combination of quiet operation, energy efficiency, reliability, modularity, and maintenance simplicity. Extensive testing in our own AMCA accredited Laborary with the use of CFD modeling allows us provide fan arrays that consistently deliver predictable performance with minimum noise and vibration at a cost that represents the best value in the industry. Unlike manufacturers that assume that the more fans, the better, Energy Labs always seeks determine the optimum number of fans for each application. The Optiline Fan Array the Optimum selection for efficiency, reliability, redundancy, size, sound level, and cost. Optiline Fan Array The Optiline Fan Array fills the performance gap between large direct drive fans and fan arrays utilizing smaller, less efficient fans. Advantages of Optiline Fan Array : More efficient than fan arrays which utilize smaller fans and mors Optimizes mor operation by running closer 10 RPM. Quieter than larger fans Shorter fan section length than larger fans Better airflow distribution than single fan Requires less space for service than a large fan Fan redundancy Optiline Fan Array Module Sizing Chart Fan Diameter Typ. CFM Range (two fans) 16 182 0 222 24 270 3 330 36 4,0 6,0 8,0 10,0 13,0 16,0,0 2,0? 10,0 14,0 18,0 23,0 29,0 3,0 42,0 4,0? Typical Mor HP Maximum Mor Range (Each Fan) Frame 3 7. 10 10 1? 7. 1 1 1 40? 284T 284T 284T 284T 286T 286T 324T 36T 36T Fan Dimensions (inches) 1H 2H (single (array) 1W 2W 3W (single) (array) (array) D 31. 63.0 34.37 68.7 37.37 74.7 41.0 82.0 44.87 89.7 49.0 98.0 49.12 98.2 3.62 107.2 8.87 117.2 31.37 62.7 94.12 34.2 68. 102.7 37.2 74. 111.7 40.87 81.7 122.62 44.62 89.2 133.87 48.87 97.7 146.62 60. 121.0 181. 6. 131.0 196. 72. 14.0 217. 38.62 39.7 41.0 42.7 4.7 46.37 48.7 3. 6.2 1. Table represent typical fan selections at." TSP 2. Fan redundancy should be considered in actual selection which may result in larger mor size requirements. 3. Consult ELI for a specific fan selection innsure the optimium fan array for all applications. 4. Consult ELI for bigger Optiline Fan Arrays 2 * Product performance data based on tests in an AMCA Accredited Laborary are not be construed as being licensed bear the AMCA Seal.
Engineering/modeling/testing = Best multiple fan system Energy Labs engineers use Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) software for modeling the airflow patterns of different fan systems. This technology allows them see how the air moves, its velocity, direction and, most importantly, the areas of turbulence. This modeling and analysis shows us important information, such as, the optimum distances from the fans where uniform airflow begins. Unwanted byproducts of air movement are noise and fan frame vibration. Software ols are used analyze the fan frame design minimize low frequency vibration that can travel through a building s structural members. After completing the computer simulations, we manufacture protypes and test them extensively in our AMCA Accredited Test Facility*. Extensive testing ensures accurate performance data for the Optiline Fan Array system. 10 1 9 Optiline Fan Array Acoustics 90 db All fans have a peak noise level that occurs at the blade passage frequency. Compared a large single fan, multiple smaller fans operate at higher speeds move the same volume of air and consequently have a higher blade passage frequency. This higher frequency sound is more easily muted in acoustically absorbent materials. 8 7 70 63 123 2 10 40 HZ ELPF 402 Optiline Fan Array 222 (4) This chart shows the 22.0 Optiline Fan Array sound power levels in comparison with a single 40 fan. Optiline Fan Array operates in a carefully designed and manufactured sound-absorbing compartment. These fan compartments contain sound absorbing material placed for maximum sound reduction and minimal effect on the air moved by the fan. * Product performance data based on tests in an AMCA Accredited Laborary are not be construed as being licensed bear the AMCA Seal. 3
Mor Speed and Longevity Larger fans in Optiline Fan Array systems operate at speeds that are closer the Standard 10 RPM. Standard 10-RPM mors are readily available and are the most cost effective on the market. Smaller fans in other systems often operate at much higher speeds (90Hz), which leads premature mor failure. Vibration Free Operation and Easy Maintainnability Each Optiline Fan Array is built using fan bases constructed of welded structural steel not light gauge formed sheet metal. Each individual fan base is mounted on spring isolars and attached the array supports with flexible connecrs that insure the vibration free operation continues for the life of the equipment. With an Optiline Fans the use of these properly designed isolars means that mors can easily be replaced in the field without the expense and bother of returning the complete fan module the manufacturer. This means it is never required sck difficult change complete fan assemblies locally that can disrupt unit operation for long periods of time should they need be installed in place of a failed mor on any one fan. Industry standard size mors can almost always be obtained locally and can be changed in a matter of a few minutes quickly retuning the unit full operation. Part quantities Notes quantity of mors quantity of contacrs quantity of circuit-breakers (thermal type) quantity of fuses quantity of transducers Generic failure rates pg. A-9, section 12.1 pg. A-9, section 13.1 pg. A-9, section 14. pg. A-10, section 22.1 Quality facrs pg. A-11, (reports as N/A ) pg. A-11 pg. A-11 pg. A-11, (reports as N/A ) failures per 106 hours (approx. 114 years) failures per 3 months failures per 6 months failures per 1 year failures per 2 years failures per 4 years failures per 8 years failures per 16 years average tal hours investigate, identify, fix failure of fan average rate in dollars per hour tal dollars for one failure fix Optiline Fan Array Reliability Overall system reliability is a function of many items. In general terms, while multiple fans offer many benefits in certain applications, they do add complexity, and actually reduce system reliability. More is certainly not always better in this case. Systems that arbitrarily use a large number of small diameter fans actually have a lower system reliability than a system designed with fewer fans. Increased failure rates of small horsepower mors compared larger horsepower mors are just one facr. 4 failure fix cost per 3 months failure fix cost per 6 months failure fix cost per 1 year failure fix cost per 2 years failure fix cost per 4 years failure fix cost per 8 years failure fix cost per 16 years The table shown compares a 16 fan vs a 4 fan design and shows it costs over 30,0 more maintain and repair the 16 fan system. Energy Labs believes there is an optimum number of fans for each application and set of job requirements. Only by analyzing tal energy use (including actual mor efficiencies), sound requirements, maintenance costs, space considerations and system redundancy issues, can the designer select the optimum number of fans be selected.
System Energy 1 NEMA Premium Mor Efficiencies The smaller mors used on smaller fans are inherently less efficient, as is revealed in virtually every mor catalog, and by the U.S. Dept. of Energy, which shows that even at partial loads a larger mor is more efficient than a smaller one. 90 10 Efficiency A quick look at the minimum mor efficiencies in NEMA MG-1 will quickly show that larger mors are more efficient than smaller mors. 9 10 8 36 7 The aerodynamic efficiency of larger fans is greater than smaller fans, due the larger size of the fan blade. As such, the derived higher system efficiency of the Optiline Fan Array, delivers operational cost savings you. 0 10 30 40 60 70 HP Most Optiline Fan Array selections use 4 pole, (10rpm) mors which have a higher efficiency than the 36-rpm mors often used with smaller fans. Redundancy Optiline Fan Array offers the end user reliability through multiple redundancies: In case of fan failure the system can be designed aumatically ramp-up the operational fans meet your airflow requirements. There is also an optional isolation damper which will close the inlet of the non-operational fan prevent recirculation. Cost Competitive Here s why Optiline Fan Array System Units are 1 % less expensive than those using more of smaller fans: Fewer fans and mors. Fewer inlet or discharge dampers for flow isolation Fewer parts in the electrical system and less complex wiring. Fewer parts in control system and less complex wiring. Fewer mechanical components.
Choosing the Optimum Number of Fans How many fans should a system have? Consider these facts; Smaller fans typically have static efficiencies in the mid high 60% range. Larger fans may be selected for many applications with efficiencies of 70% or higher. Mor efficiencies improve significantly as mors increase in size. Mors below 7. Hp in many cases are 10% less efficient than a larger mor. System redundancy can usually be handled easily by any fan configuration utilizing 4 or more fans. Fan selections at less than peak mor RPM allow the operating fans increase in speed as needed maintain desired airflow. Cabinet length can decrease as the number of fans increases, however height and width increase dramatically. Actual job conditions need be analyzed if space is a prime consideration Smaller fans typically create noise in higher octave bands than larger fans, making attenuation easier. Only by analyzing tal energy use, sound requirements, maintenance costs, space considerations and system redundancy issues, can the designer select the optimum number of fans for each system. Contact your Energy Labs Sales representative for the Optimum answer for your application. Fan Shut_off Device When a fan fails, the performance of the system is significantly reduced due air flowing back through the failed fan. Energy Labs Flo-valve can prevent this efficiency loss. Aumatic or manually operated versions are available. Aumatic versions are enabled through current moniring controls. For the best in fan isolation specify Energy Labs Flo-valve. This system with a high quality spun disk and machined hub is designed minimize airflow obstruction in the fan inlet during normal operation. Testing in Energy Labs AMCA Accredited Laborary* shows that fans operating with flo-valves have lower sound power levels than fans operated with inlet dampers. Sound Power Level db re: 1E-12 W 110 10 1 9 90 8 Bare Fan Flo-valve 7 Inlet Damper 32 13 0 0 31 0 12 70 Freq. (Hz) Fig. 3 Comparison of outlet sound power level in each of three test configurations 6 * Product performance data based on tests in an AMCA Accredited Laborary are not be construed as being licensed bear the AMCA Seal.
Construction Features High-efficiency airfoil fan blades Premium high-efficiency cast-frame mors Highly engineered sound attenuars Seismic Rated Spring Isolation Class 2 and Class 3 all aluminum fully welded wheel construction for maximum corrosion resistance and light weight Flo-valve, available for shuff of individual fans in case of failure Cast aluminum fan hub Lighter weight of fan wheel, longer life on mor bearings Welded fan frame and sound compartment 7
Energy Labs Products Cusm Air Handling Units Capacities from 0,0 CFM; With Chilled water Glycol DX Hot water Steam coils Indirect / Direct Evaporative Cooling Systems Capacities from 2,0 1,0 CFM. 304 stainless-steel housing. High efficiency air air heat exchanger. Cusm Air Cooled DX Units Energy Recovery Systems With Heat Exchangers or Heat Wheels. Cusm Evap. Condensing Units Available from 3 ns. Integrated controls. R410a and R134a refrigerants. Copeland Scroll and screw compressors. B-Opti-0112 Air cooled condensing units are available from 1 140 ns. Integrated controls. R410a and R134a refrigerants. Copeland Scroll and screw compressors. Thermal Break construction Hi Efficiency injected foam panels. Capacities from 0,0 CFM. R M E M B E R For more information including detailed product specifications, and specific requirements for special applications, please contact your local sales representative. 961 Airway Rd. Suite E San Diego Ca. 9214 - Phone: (619) 671-01 Fax: (619) 671-0160 - http://www.energylabs.com