Human Factors - Egress Analysis for High Hazard Occupancies. Presented by: Michael J. Klemenz, PE, SFPE

Similar documents
CHAPTER 7 ALTERATIONS LEVEL

Life Safety - Means of Egress/Exits NFPA 101

COSTCO, SAN FRANCISCO A PRESCRIPTIVE AND PERFORMANCE BASED ANALYSIS OF FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS AND DESIGN

2009 International Fire Code Errata. SECOND PRINTING (Posted April 6, 2010)

EXIT ROUTES, EMERGENCY ACTION PLANS, AND. FIRE PREVENTION PLANS. PART 1: INTRODUCTION

City of South Salt Lake Fire Code Training Exiting, Egress Systems and Egress Control

How to Use Fire Risk Assessment Tools to Evaluate Performance Based Designs

Agency for Health Care Administration

Construction Innovation Center Building 186

2. The Group F occupancy has have an a combined occupant load of 500 or more above or below the lowest level of exit discharge.

FIRE EVACUATION PLAN PRATT STREET PARKING GARAGE AND ATHLETIC CENTER POLICE FIRE MEDICAL EMERGENCY

EQUIVALENT INITIAL FIRE SAFETY ASSESSMENT

University of Maryland FIRE EVACUATION PLAN Columbus Center POLICE FIRE MEDICAL EMERGENCY - 911

Residential Care Facilities Requirements

INITIAL FIRE SAFETY ASSESSMENT

Residential Based Care Facility Guidelines

THE 2012 EDITION OF THE LIFE SAFETY CODE NURSING HOME EDITION SESSION #2

For additional information regarding R-3.1 residential care facilities please contact (951)

Date: February 22, 2005 Kimbalton DUSEL, Pre-S-2 Submittal CNA0402 PRELIMINARY CODE REVIEW. International Plumbing Code Edition

FIRE SAFETY INSPECTION REPORT

INITIAL FIRE SAFETY ASSESSMENT

New Facilities. Minimum Requirements

Riverside County Fire Department Office of the Fire Marshal Market St., Ste. 150, Riverside, CA Ph. (951) Fax (951)

Element C3.5 Means of Escape

By: Russell Bainbridge March 18th, 2016 FPE 596

Agency for Health Care Administration

Tunnel Fire Dynamics and Evacuation Simulations

DEALING WITH FIRE SAFETY

Agency for Health Care Administration

LIFE SAFETY CODE ESSENTIALS PRESENTED BY: LARRY VIGIL, RISK CONSULTANT

EQUIVALENT INITIAL FIRE SAFETY ASSESSMENT

SPECIAL DETAILED REQUIREMENTS BASED ON USE AND OCCUPANCY

ICC CODE CORNER 2012 IFC Code & Commentary

SECTION 907 FIRE ALARM AND DETECTION SYSTEMS

Common Building Code Misinterpretations

INITIAL FIRE SAFETY ASSESSMENT

SPECIAL DETAILED REQUIREMENTS BASED ON USE AND OCCUPANCY

January 1, 2014 Mandatory Effective Date

Presented by: Bill Lauzon, PE Lauzon Life Safety Consulting, LLC Web: Lauzon-LSC.com

University of Maryland FIRE EVACUATION PLAN NATIONAL DENTAL MUSEUM POLICE FIRE MEDICAL EMERGENCY Anyone discovering excessive heat,

SPECIAL DETAILED REQUIREMENTS BASED ON USE AND OCCUPANCY

Report on First Revisions with Statement June 2014 NFPA 101

Construction Warehouse. FPE 596 Culminating Experience In Fire Protection Engineering Final Project (Spring 2014) By Ben Johnson

INITIAL FIRE SAFETY ASSESSMENT

Residential-based Care Facility R-4 Guideline

NFPA Changes

COMPLIANCE ALTERNATIVES

COMPLIANCE ALTERNATIVES

Building & Fire Code Academy. Building Better With Our Greatest Resource Education. Welcome!

Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 Research Focus This study tries to develop a procedure by which the architecture plans for egress systems can be compared

FIRE SAFETY INSPECTION REPORT REDPOINT JACKETS LTD, DHAKA, BANGLADESH

Exit Routes. Introduction/Overview. OSHA Regulations. Exit Route

INITIAL FIRE SAFETY ASSESSMENT - EXPANSION

INITIAL FIRE SAFETY ASSESSMENT

Chapter Nursing Homes

Mulch fires, trash can fires, or other fire outside a building should be reported by the following methods:

EQUIVALENT INITIAL FIRE SAFETY ASSESSMENT

Public. Mike Free Health. State of Alabama Department of

INITIAL FIRE ASSESSMENT REPORT (FAR)

12F052 ADVANCED FLORIDA (MULTIPLE OCCUPANCY BUILDINGS)

PERFORMANCE COMPLIANCE METHODS

Public Health Fax: Web Site:

EQUIVALENT INITIAL FIRE SAFETY ASSESSMENT

Fire Safety Evaluation of Existing Manufactured Educational Building Covered by Section 423 of the Florida Building Code

University of Maryland FIRE EVACUATION PLAN

Dutchess Community College. Emergency Action Plan. Conklin Hall College Residence

SANTA ROSA FIRE DEPARTMENT FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU INSPECTION GUIDELINE RESIDENTIAL CARE FACILITIES 2007 CBC/CFC (R-3.1)

SANTA ROSA FIRE DEPARTMENT FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST

FIRE SAFETY INSPECTION REPORT

PERFORMANCE COMPLIANCE METHODS

SAFETY. USE OF SAFETY CHECK LISTS A safety check for compliance with current regulations should be performed yearly.

Statue of Liberty: A Risk Analysis

PERFORMANCE COMPLIANCE METHODS

PROPOSED CODE CHANGES FOR REVIEW BY THE FIRE CODE ACTION COMMITTEE

Richard B. Alpert, P.E. Senior FPE, Clark Nexsen

THE 2012 EDITION OF THE LIFE SAFETY CODE HOSPITAL EDITION SESSION #5

INITIAL FIRE SAFETY ASSESSMENT

INITIAL FIRE SAFETY ASSESSMENT - EXPANSION

Life Safety Report. XYZ Office Building. Denver Colorado. Prepared by: Keith Dix Monday, June 3, 2013

rpsa FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERS

NYU RESIDENTIAL FIRE SAFETY PLAN PART I - BUILDING INFORMATION SECTION

AHC Meeting #7 July 12-13, Occupancy WG Report

2012 B.C. Building Code Compliance Review (Division B Part 3)

Welcome to the AccessibilityOnline Webinar Series. Listening to the Webinar. Listening to the Webinar, continued

SEMICONDUCTOR FABRICATION FACILITIES

2015 Recommended Building Code with Amendments. The Executive Committee of the Central Iowa Code Consortium does ordain as follows:

Agency for Health Care Administration

Table of Contents CHAPTER 10 ADMINISTRATIVE RULES FOR CERTIFICATION OF CHILD CARE FACILITIES FIRE STANDARDS FOR FAMILY CHILD CARE HOME

St. John s University

HAWAII ADMINISTRATIVE RULES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS DIVISION OF OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH GENERAL INDUSTRY STANDARDS

Burien/Normandy Park Fire Department 900 SW 146 th ST PO Box Burien, WA BP (206) Fax (206)

STATE OF MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE OFFICE OF THE STATE FIRE MARSHAL

ALARM SYSTEMS AND EVACUATION PLANS SELF INSPECTION CHECKLIST

St. John s University

St. John s University Fire Safety Plan

FIRE SAFETY INSPECTION REPORT

Ch. 54 GROUP B EDUCATIONAL 34 CHAPTER 54. GROUP B EDUCATIONAL OCCUPANCY GROUP

EQUIVALENT INITIAL FIRE SAFETY ASSESSMENT

2012 International Fire Code Errata (Portions of text and tables not shown are unaffected by the errata)

BUILDING CODE OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK. New York City Department of Buildings 4 June 2007

Transcription:

Human Factors - Egress Analysis for High Hazard Occupancies Presented by: Michael J. Klemenz, PE, SFPE

Group H Other SFPE presenters today discussed issues relevant to Group H This presentation addresses means of egress (MOE) Prescriptive and engineered methods

Group H Defined SECTION 307 HIGH-HAZARD GROUP H 307.1 High-Hazard Group H. High-hazard Group H occupancy includes, among others, the use of a building or structure, or a portion thereof, that involves the manufacturing, processing, generation or storage of materials that constitute a physical or health hazard in quantities in excess of those allowed in control areas constructed and located as required in Section 414

Objectives Means of Egress (MOE) Concepts Prescriptive Code Requirements Example Performance-Based Alternatives Human Behavior in Fire Emergencies Q&A

MOE Defined A continuous and unobstructed path of vertical and horizontal egress travel from any occupied portion of a building or structure to a public way.

Alternate definition Engineered building systems that permit protected travel from the interior of a building [on fire] to the relative safety of the exterior [not on fire] prior to the onset of untenable fire conditions.

Components A passive fire protection system Consists of 3 parts: Exit Access ( non-protected path) Exit ( protected part) Exit Discharge (safety)

Generally Codes normally prescribe at least two separate & remote egress paths Exit access travel distance limits apply Must be maintained for the life of the building

Two Directions Keep in mind While occupants are exiting the building during a fire emergency Emergency service providers are entering the building to render aid or mitigate the emergency (fire, EMS, Haz-Mat, etc.)

Objectives Means of Egress (MOE) Concepts Prescriptive Code Requirements Example Performance-Based Alternatives Human Behavior in Fire Emergencies Q&A

Codes & Standards NYS building code Chapter 10 Means of Egress IBC Chapter 10 NFPA 101, Life Safety Code OSHA CFR 1910 Subpart E

Occupant Load The number of persons for which the means of egress of a building or portion thereof is designed

Gross Floor Area The floor area within the inside perimeter of the exterior walls of the building under consideration, exclusive of vent shafts and courts, without deduction for corridors, stairways, closets, the thickness of interior walls, columns or other features. The floor area of a building, or portion thereof, not provided with surrounding exterior walls shall be the usable area under the horizontal projection of the roof or floor above. The gross floor area shall not include shafts with no openings or interior courts.

Accessible Moe A continuous and unobstructed way of egress travel from any accessible point in a building or facility to a public way.

Exit Access That portion of a means of egress system that leads from any occupied portion of a building or structure to an exit. Normally no fire resistance rating

Exit That portion of a means of egress system which is separated from other interior spaces of a building or structure by fire-resistance-rated construction and opening protectives as required to provide a protected path of egress travel between the exit access and the exit discharge. Exits include exterior exit doors at ground level, exit enclosures, exit passageways, exterior exit stairs, exterior exit ramps and horizontal exits.

Exit Discharge That portion of a means of egress system between the termination of an exit and a public way.

Public Way A street, alley or other parcel of land open to the outside air leading to a street that has been deeded, dedicated or otherwise permanently appropriated to the public for public use and which has a clear width and height of not less than 10 feet It is the final destination for occupants and is assumed to be safe from the emergency in the structure.

Exit Enclosure An exit component that is separated from other interior spaces of a building or structure by fire resistance-rated construction and opening protectives, and provides for a protected path of egress travel in a vertical or horizontal direction to the exit discharge or the public way.

Corridor An enclosed exit access component that defines and provides a path of egress travel to an exit. NOT the same as an exit passageway

Exit Passageway An exit component that is separated from all other interior spaces of a building or structure by fire-resistance-rated construction and opening protectives, and provides for a protected path of egress travel in a horizontal direction to the exit discharge or the public way.

Common Path Of Travel That portion of exit access which the occupants are required to traverse before two separate and distinct paths of egress travel to two exits are available. Paths that merge are common paths of travel. Common paths of egress travel shall be included within the permitted travel distance.

Exit Access Travel Distance Exits shall be so located on each story such that the maximum length of exit access travel measured from the most remote point within a story to the entrance to an exit along the natural and unobstructed path of egress travel, shall not exceed the distances given in Table 1016.1.

Measurement of Travel Distance NFPA 101-7.6*. 7.6.1* The travel distance to an exit shall be measured on the floor or other walking surface as follows: (1) Along the centerline of the natural path of travel, starting from the most remote point subject to occupancy (2) Curving around any corners or obstructions, with a 12 in. clearance therefrom (3) Terminating at (a) Center of the doorway, (b) Other point at which the exit begins or (c) exit discharge

Objectives Means of Egress (MOE) Concepts Prescriptive Code Requirements Example Performance-Based Alternatives Human Behavior in Fire Emergencies Q&A

Example Problem Single story, 4000 sf. building Non-separated uses consisting of labs, offices, storage, process and support spaces Construction type per Table 503 NFPA 13 fire sprinkler system IAW 903.2.4.1

Group H Building Class 4 Oxidizers- quantity exceeds Table 307.1.1 for a control area 307.3 High-Hazard Group H-1. Buildings and structures containing materials that pose a detonation hazard

EXAMPLE Refer to Board/Easel

Example 1. Calculate occupant load 2. Evaluate means of egress 3. Make necessary corrections

Example 1. Calculate occupant load 2. Evaluate means of egress 3. Make necessary corrections

Occupant Load Also see NFPA 101 Table 7-3.1.2 Occupant load factors in Table 1004.1.1 Industrial areas: 100 gross Accessory storage areas, mechanical equipment rooms: 300 gross Business areas: 100 gross Where an intended use is not listed in Table 1004.1.1, the code enforcement official shall establish a use based on a listed use that most nearly resembles the intended use.

Occupant Load Assume occupant load factor of 75 sf. gross per the AHJ Occupant load = 4000 sf. 75/sf. =53.3 54 occupants

Example 1. Calculate occupant load 2. Evaluate means of egress 3. Make necessary corrections

Summary of Values for H-1 * Single exit H-1 not permitted by Table 1019.2 Feature Value Reference Number of Exits 2 Table 1019.1* Exit Access Travel Distance 75 1016.1 Common Path of Travel 25 1014.3 Dead End Corridor 20 1017.3 Corridor Width 44 or per Table 1005.1 1017.2 Exit Remoteness 1/3 max. horizontal 1015.2.1 Corridor FRR 1 hr. w/ 20 min. door Table 1017.1

Example TABLE 1005.1 EGRESS WIDTH PER OCCUPANT SERVED Occupancy No Sprinklers With Sprinklers Stairway (in. per occupan t) Other egress components (in. per occupant) Stairway (in. per occupant) Other egress components (in. per occupant) Other than listed below Hazardous: H-1, H-2, H-3 & H-4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.15 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.2 Institutional: I-2 NA NA 0.3 0.2

Example 1. Calculate occupant load 2. Evaluate means of egress 3. Make necessary corrections

1006.4 contains detailed photometric and performance requirements Ceiling Height & Lighting 1003.2 Ceiling height. The means of egress shall have a ceiling height of not less than 7-6 1006.2 Illumination level. MOE illumination level shall not be < 1 foot-candle (11 lux) at the walking surface level. Power shall be from the premises' electrical supply. Provide E-power (90 minutes) in MOE components.

Objectives Means of Egress (MOE) Concepts Prescriptive Code Requirements Example Performance-Based Alternatives Human Behavior in Fire Emergencies Q&A

Alternate Methods Egress Time < Hazardous conditions time Apply where compliance with prescriptive parameters may not be possible or practical Use FP engineering principles and computer modeling to simulate fire development and compare to calculated egress time from a building

Fire Modeling One side of the equation ASET (Available Safe Egress Time) is a program for calculating the temperature and position of the hot smoke layer in a single room with closed doors and windows. Used to determine the time to the onset of hazardous conditions for both people and property.

Fire Modeling DETACT (DETector ACTuation-Time squared) is a program for calculating the actuation time of thermal devices Used to predict the actuation time of fixedtemperature and rate-of-rise heat detectors and of sprinkler heads subject to a userspecified fire that grows as the square of time.

Fire Modeling CFAST (Consolidated Model of Fire Growth and Smoke Transport) is a multi-room fire model that predicts the conditions resulting from a userspecified fire within a structure

Fire Modeling FDS (Fire Dynamics Simulator) predicts the transport of heat and smoke from a fire. BREAK1 estimates time until glass breaks FPEtool is a multi-purpose modeling tool

CFAST Input Parameters Geometrical data describing the rooms and connections Thermophysical properties of the ceiling, walls, and floors Fire as a rate of mass loss Generation rates of the products of combustion

CFAST Output Temperature, species concentrations and thickness of the hot upper layer and the cooler lower layer in each compartment Surface temperatures, heat transfer, and mass flow rates

Total Egress Time The other side of the equation Time to Notification Reaction Time Pre-evacuation Activity Time Travel or Movement Time

Time to Notification Fire detection or discovery Signal processing Alert signal or message to occupants Received by occupants? NFPA 72, National Fire Alarm Code

Reaction Time Time it takes an occupant to perceive the alarm or fire cue and then decide what action to take Depends on what the occupant perceives Immediate danger?

Pre-evacuation Activity Time Time that elapses while the occupant is preparing to leave or seek refuge Safely shut down plant operations? Make phone calls? Alert others? Secure sensitive files & information?

Travel or Movement Time Time to move to a location of safety Includes horizontal and vertical travel 250 ft/min average speed* for occupants with no impairments? Significant speed reduction for occupants with disabilities

Successful MOE Design Time to the onset of hazardous conditions for occupants Total egress time Egress Time < Hazardous conditions time

Objectives Means of Egress (MOE) Concepts Prescriptive Code Requirements Example Performance-Based Alternatives Human Behavior in Fire Emergencies Q&A

Human Behavior The way a person reacts to a fire emergency is dependent on many complex and interrelated factors Occupant actions are influenced by the perceived fire threat and observed behavior in others

Evacuation Studies The earliest documented studies on human behavior in the United States involved capacity counts of the velocity of pedestrian movement for the New York City design of the Hudson Terminal Building in 1901 The first edition of the National Fire Protection Association s Building Exits Code in 1927 (which eventually evolved into NFPA 101, Life Safety Code ) was developed from evacuation studies conducted during the decade since 1917.

Occupant Interviews Scientific, post-fire interviews with people have revealed a great deal of data on occupants actions during the fire Experiments were performed to observe subjects reactions to fire cues

An Interesting Experiment People s Inhibition of Smoke Cues (Source: B. Latane and J. M. Darley, Group Inhibition of Bystander Intervention in Emergencies, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 10, No. 3, 1968, p. 218) College students While the students were completing a written questionnaire, the experimenter introduced smoke into the room through a small vent in the wall If the students left the room and reported the smoke, the experiment was terminated.

An Interesting Experiment People s Inhibition of Smoke Cues (Source: B. Latane and J. M. Darley, Group Inhibition of Bystander Intervention in Emergencies, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 10, No. 3, 1968, p. 218) If the students did not report the presence of the smoke within 6 minutes from the time they first noticed it, the experiment was considered complete. Students alone in the room reported the smoke in 75 percent of the cases. When two passive, noncommittal persons joined each student, only 10 percent of the students reported the smoke.

Consider Hotel Room, 3AM Bell ringing in hallway No visible smoke, odors, etc. People milling around casually Explain your general impression and probable state of mind

NOW Consider Hotel Room, 3AM Bell ringing in hallway Smoke visible outside your window People yelling, crashing, banging Doorknob feels warm Sound of fire trucks approaching

Panic Reaction? Research indicates that people exhibit panic reaction in a very small ( <1%) number of instances During the decision-making period, people tend to remain calm, analytical & cooperative Only when directly confronted with direct fire products does panic set in

Questions/Answers

Human Factors - Egress Analysis for High Hazard Occupancies Presented by: Michael J. Klemenz, PE, SFPE