Depth to Any Soil Restrictive Layer

Similar documents
Depth to a Selected Soil Restrictive Layer

Percent Silt. Ontario County, New York Survey Area Version and Date: 13-09/24/2016

Linear Extensibility

Cation-Exchange Capacity (CEC-7)

Liquid Limit. Ontario County, New York Survey Area Version and Date: 13-09/24/2016

Range Production (Unfavorable Year)

Surface Texture. Layer Option: Surface Layer Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Tie-break Rule: Lower

Electrical Conductivity (EC)

Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity (Ksat), Standard Classes

Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR)

Drainage Class. Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Tie-break Rule: Higher. Ontario County, New York Survey Area Version and Date: 13-09/24/2016

Effective Cation-Exchange Capacity (ECEC)

Farmland Classification

Percent Clay. Ontario County, New York Survey Area Version and Date: 13-09/24/2016

K Factor, Whole Soil

Hydrologic Soil Group

Potential for Seedling Mortality

Erosion Hazard (Off-Road, Off-Trail)

Soil Taxonomy Classification

Oneida County Soil Survey ID Number Name Slope/Descriptor 55A Adams Loamy Sand 0-3% slopes 55B Adams Loamy Sand 3-8% slopes 55C Adams Loamy Sand

Any County, New York. Custom Soil Resource Report for. Homer Vegetable Research Farm. United States Department of Agriculture

Custom Soil Resource Report for Tompkins County, New York

This section describes the geologic, soil, and topographic conditions of the Nation s four properties and immediately surrounding area.

Custom Soil Resource Report for Ulster County, New York

Area 3 Envirothon Soils Questions Key

Section 1. Judging the soil pit (questions 1-4)


Custom Soil Resource Report for State of Connecticut

Custom Soil Resource Report for State of Connecticut

Soil types of lake county

Custom Soil Resource Report for Orange County, New York, and Sussex County, New Jersey

NRCS Soils Report. Grand River Gathering LLC K28E Compressor Station. OA Project No

Custom Soil Resource Report for Columbia County, New York

Custom Soil Resource Report for Orange County, Virginia

2016 Area 3 Envirothon Muskingum County Soils Test ANSWER KEY

TP73 4PTP101 TP45 TP9 TP74 TP46 TP47 TP115 TP48 TP32 TP5 TP31 TP22 TP49 V58 TP57 4F TP50 TP51 3PD 3PD TP80 TP28 TP55

Survey of Texas Vineyard Soils

BENNING ROAD & BRIDGES TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS NRCS SOIL RESOURCE REPORT DRAFT MAY 2016

Custom Soil Resource Report for Craighead County, Arkansas

September 20, 2016 Soils Investigation for Agricultural Designation Windemere Place, Missoula County, Montana

Soils and Land Use Test

SOILS IN URBAN / SUBURBAN LANDSCAPES. Lisa Krall Soil Scientist CT USDA NRCS Tolland, CT

2011 Wisconsin Envirothon Soils and Land Use Exam

Lesson 1: Identifying Texture in Soil

Soil testing Page 1. Contrary to what is widely believed, the colour of the soil reveals very little about its fertility.

Lane County Land Management Division

NRCS Soils Report. Encana Oil & Gas (USA) Inc. C19 Injection Well. OA Project No

Soil characteristics that influence nitrogen and water management

Custom Soil Resource Report for Fond du Lac County, Wisconsin

Geology, Soils, and Topography October 13, ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, IMPACTS, MITIGATION. 3.1 Geology, Soils, and Topography

Custom Soil Resource Report for Franklin County, Washington

EXAMPLE Point A: Sandy Loam: 65% Sand _ 20% Silt _ 15% Clay. Point B: %Sand % Silt % Clay. Point C: %Sand % Silt % Clay. Point D: %Sand % Silt % Clay

APPENDIX A SOIL RESOURCES REPORTS

Soils Report. Contact your local District Conservationist for site specific assistance

Soils and their Relationship with Agriculture

Do Now: From which materials do you think soil is made? Are all soils the same? Think of some ways that they are different?

~ NRCS. Custom Soil Resource Report for Rifle Area, Colorado, Parts of Garfield and Mesa Counties. USDA United States ~ Department of Agriculture

SOIL SEPARATES. Soil Evaluator Day 2, Presentation 3-3/27/2018. Soil Texture, Page 1 TITLE 5 SOIL EVALUATOR CERTIFICATION TRAINING SOIL TEXTURE

Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map

Recommended Resources: The following resources may be useful in teaching this lesson:

SOIL DATA: Avondale. in Allen, TX. This information was taken from NRCS web soil survey of Collin County, Texas.

Custom Soil Resource Report for Cibola Area, New Mexico, Parts of Cibola, McKinley, and Valencia Counties

Custom Soil Resource Report for Polk County, Oregon

Custom Soil Resource Report for Alsea Area, Oregon, and Lincoln County Area, Oregon

80 ACRES M/L BOONE COUNTY, IOWA LISTING # Pilot Mound, Iowa. I Avenue. 130th Street. Co Hwy P th Street

Horner-McLaughlin Woods: Soil Types

SOIL SCIENTIST REPORT FOR THE CONNECTICUT PORTION OF THE CONNECTICUT EXPANSION PROJECT. Prepared for:

a. OVERALL PROFILE DEPTH: Assess the depth to the first restrictive layer, which can be a tree root, a rock or an

Submittal Document II.I. USDA NRCS Soil Resources Report

STATE TAX COMMISSION OF MISSOURI ASSESSOR MANUAL

1 Describe the concept of soil texture and its importance. 2 Determine the texture of a soil sample.

Custom Soil Resource Report for Southampton County, Virginia

Custom Soil Resource Report for Pope County, Illinois

Custom Soil Resource Report for Gallia County, Ohio

Custom Soil Resource Report for Hancock County Area, Maine

DO YOU KNOW YOUR SOILS? (Rev. 10/11)

1. Position (2 pts.) 2. Parent Material (2 pts.) 3. Slope Characteristics (2 pts.) 4. Surface Stoniness or Rockiness (2 pts.)

URBAN SOILS & SEATTLE EXAMPLES

Custom Soil Resource Report for Pope County, Illinois

Custom Soil Resource Report for Kane County, Illinois

Custom Soil Resource Report for Lane County Area, Oregon

STATEMENT OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION WITTON PARK, COUNTY DURHAM PROPOSED QUARRY EXTENSION DECEMBER 1992

PHYSICAL CHAtlACTERISTICS REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED SAND AND GRAVEL SITE AT MANOR FARM, UFFINGTON

Custom Soil Resource Report for Yamhill Area, Oregon

Soil CLASS. VII Soil Soil is an inseparable part of our life. Explain Humus Weathering The nature of soil: Soil Profile Horizons.

Understanding Soil Texture and Structure

CONNECTICUT ENVIROTHON 2012 SOILS QUESTIONS

HORT 102: Soil Properties. Cultivated Plants: Lecture 15. [Teresa Koenig] Slide #: 1 Slide Title: Intro Information Slide

Urban Soils Career Development Event

Custom Soil Resource Report for Centre County, Pennsylvania

ASCE - Philadelphia. Soils & Stormwater Management. Matthew C. Hostrander, CPSS, SEO Soil Scientist. Gilmore & Associates, Inc.

~ NRCS. Custom Soil Resource Report for Rifle Area, Colorado, Parts of Garfield and Mesa Counties. USDA United States ~ Department of Agriculture

Topoclimate Southland Soil Technical Data Sheet No Waiau

List of Equipment, Tools, Supplies, and Facilities:

Soil Survey of Nelson County, Virginia

+/- 60 AC LAND FOR SALE HARLEY ROAD, ELBURN, IL 60119

Farmland Classification Centre County, Pennsylvania (Student Farm Site) Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Lesson 1: Recognizing the Characteristics of Soils and the Soil Requirements for Fruit and Nut Crops

EDULABZ. Ans. (b) 7. The soft, porous layer with a good water-retaining capacity forms the

Custom Soil Resource Report for Hamilton County, Texas

Transcription:

1A 2A 3A 4A name Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3, frequently flooded Geneseo silty clay loam, 0 to 3 Hemlock silty clay loam, 0 to 3 Naples Creek silty clay loam, 0 to 3 5A Wayland soils complex, 0 to 3, frequently flooded 12D Rockrift channery silt loam, 15 to 25 85 13F Rock outcrop-arnot complex, 25 to 70 55 14D Cadosia channery silt loam, 15 to 25 85 15A Guyanoga channery silt loam, fan, 0 to 3 15B Guyanoga channery silt loam, fan, 3 to 8 16A Almond channery silt loam, 0 to 3 80 16B Almond channery silt loam, 3 to 8 80 16C Almond channery silt loam, 8 to 15 80 18A 19A 20A 24A 24B 24C 24D 25A 25B 25C 25D 25E 26B 27B 31A 31B 31C 31D 32A 32B 33A 33B 33C 33D 33E 34A Homer fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 Fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic, Typic Argiaquolls, 0 to 3 Atherton and Fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic, Typic Argiaquolls, 0 to 3 Howard gravelly loam, 0 to 3 Howard gravelly loam, 3 to 8 Howard gravelly loam, 8 to 15 Howard soils, 15 to 25 Chenango gravelly loam, 0 to 3 Chenango gravelly loam, 3 to 8 Chenango gravelly loam, 8 to 15 Chenango gravelly loam, 15 to 25 Chenango gravelly loam, 25 to 35 Chenango channery loam, fan, 3 to 8 Castile gravelly silt loam, 3 to 8 Collamer silt loam, 0 to 3 Collamer silt loam, 3 to 8 Collamer silt loam, 8 to 15 Collamer silt loam, 15 to 25 Dunkirk fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 Dunkirk fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 Dunkirk silt loam, 0 to 3 Dunkirk silt loam, 3 to 8 Dunkirk silt loam, 8 to 15 Dunkirk silt loam, 15 to 25 Dunkirk silt loam, 25 to 35 Lakemont silty clay loam, 0 to 3 35A Odessa silt loam, 0 to 3 85 35B Odessa silty clay loam, 3 to 8 85 Page 1 of 6

36A 36B 36C 36D 36E 37A 37B 38A 38B 39A name Schoharie silty clay loam, 0 to 3 Schoharie silty clay loam, 3 to 8 Schoharie silty clay loam, 8 to 15 Schoharie silty clay loam, 15 to 25 Schoharie silty clay loam, 25 to 45 Schoharie silt loam, 0 to 3 Schoharie silt loam, 3 to 8 Niagara silt loam, 0 to 3 Niagara silt loam, 3 to 8 Rhinebeck silty clay loam, 0 to 3 41A Aeric Epiaquepts, 0 to 3 81 50 43A 44A 45A Canandaigua silt loam, 0 to 3 Canandaigua mucky silt loam, 0 to 3 Fonda mucky silt loam, 0 to 3 46A Galen fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 90 46B Galen fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 90 48A 48B 48C 48D 49B 49D 49E 49F 50B 50C 50D 53A Arkport fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 Arkport fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 Arkport fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 Arkport fine sandy loam, 15 to 25 Arkport loamy fine sand, 3 to 8 Arkport loamy fine sand, 15 to 25 Arkport loamy fine sand, 25 to 35 Arkport loamy fine sand, 35 to 55 Dunkirk-Arkport complex, 3 to 8 Dunkirk-Arkport complex, 8 to 15 Dunkirk-Arkport complex, 15 to 25 Lamson fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 54A Lamson mucky fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 56A Elnora loamy fine sand, 0 to 3 90 58B 58C Colonie loamy fine sand, 3 to 8 Colonie loamy fine sand, 8 to 15 62B Mardin channery silt loam, 3 to 8 51 85 62C Mardin channery silt loam, 8 to 15 51 88 62D Mardin channery silt loam, 15 to 25 51 85 62E Mardin channery silt loam, 25 to 35 51 80 63B Langford channery silt loam, 3 to 8 61 90 63C Langford channery silt loam, 8 to 15 pecent 61 90 63D Langford channery silt loam, 15 to 25 61 90 64B 66A Langford-Erie channery silt loams, 3 to 8 Lyons soils, 0 to 3 61 55 68A Volusia channery silt loam, 0 to 3 43 90 68B Volusia channery silt loam, 3 to 8 43 90 68C Volusia channery silt loam, 8 to 15 43 90 Page 2 of 6

name 68D Volusia channery silt loam, 15 to 25 43 90 69A Erie channery silt loam, 0 to 3 36 95 69B Erie channery silt loam, 3 to 8 36 95 69C Erie channery silt loam, 8 to 15 36 95 71A Darien silt loam, 0 to 3 95 71B Darien silt loam, 3 to 8 95 71C Darien silt loam, 8 to 15 95 72A Darien-Ilion silt loams, 0 to 3 68 72B Darien-Ilion silt loams, 3 to 8 68 73B Gretor silt loam, 3 to 8 68 95 73C Gretor silt loam, 8 to 15 68 95 73D Gretor channery silt loam, 15 to 25 68 90 76B Orpark silt loam, 3 to 8 58 95 76C Orpark silt loam, 8 to 15 58 95 76D Orpark channery silt loam, 15 to 25 58 90 77A Chippewa silt loam, 0 to 3 38 85 77B Chippewa silt loam, 3 to 8 38 85 82B Manlius channery silt loam, 3 to 8 91 95 82C Manlius channery silt loam, 8 to 15 91 95 82D Manlius channery silt loam, 15 to 25 91 95 91A 92A 93A 94A 95A Palms muck, 0 to 3 Carlisle muck, 0 to 3 Edwards muck, 0 to 3 Martisco muck, 0 to 3 Saprists, 0 to 3, inundated 101A Honeoye loam, 0 to 3 85 101B Honeoye loam, 3 to 8 85 101C Honeoye loam, 8 to 15 85 101D Honeoye loam, 15 to 25 85 101E Honeoye loam, 25 to 35 85 104A Honeoye loam, 0 to 3, lower clay 85 surface 104B Honeoye loam, 3 to 8, lower clay 85 surface 104C Honeoye loam, 8 to 15, lower clay 85 surface 106B Danley-Lansing complex, 3 to 8 50 107B Conesus-Lansing complex, 3 to 8 50 108C Lansing loam, 8 to 15 85 108D Lansing loam, 15 to 25 85 108E Lansing loam, 25 to 35 85 112B 112C 112D Ontario fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 Ontario fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 Ontario fine sandy loam, 15 to 25 112E Ontario fine sandy loam, 25 to 35 93 114B 114C Ontario gravelly loam, 3 to 8 Ontario gravelly loam, 8 to 15 Page 3 of 6

114D 116B 116C 116D name Ontario gravelly loam, 15 to 25 Ontario loam, 3 to 8 Ontario loam, 8 to 15 Ontario loam, 15 to 25 118F Ontario, Honeoye, and Lansing soils, 35 to 55 120E Palmyra and Howard soils, 25 to 45 122A 122B 124A 124B 126A 126B 126C 126D 128A 128B 128C Palmyra cobbly loam, 0 to 3 Palmyra cobbly loam, 3 to 8 Palmyra fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 Palmyra fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 Palmyra gravelly loam, 0 to 3 Palmyra gravelly loam, 3 to 8 Palmyra gravelly loam, 8 to 15 Palmyra gravelly loam, 15 to 25 Palmyra gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 3 Palmyra gravelly sandy loam, 3 to 8 Palmyra gravelly sandy loam, 8 to 15 130A Farmington loam, 0 to 3 41 90 130B Farmington loam, 3 to 8 41 90 132A Galoo loam, 0 to 3, rocky 23 95 132B Galoo loam, 3 to 8, rocky 23 95 134A Camillus silt loam, 0 to 3 81 95 134B Camillus silt loam, 3 to 8 81 95 151C Willdin-Norchip complex, 3 to 15 51 60 152B Valois gravelly loam, 3 to 8 85 152C Valois gravelly loam, 8 to 15 85 152D Valois gravelly loam, 15 to 25 85 152E Valois gravelly loam, 25 to 35 85 153B Valois gravelly loam, cool, 3 to 8 85 153C Valois gravelly loam, cool, 8 to 15 85 153D Valois gravelly loam, cool, 15 to 25 85 153E Valois gravelly loam, cool, 25 to 35 85 162B Willdin channery silt loam, 3 to 8 51 85 162C Willdin channery silt loam, 8 to 15 51 85 162D Willdin channery silt loam, 15 to 25 51 80 168A Ontusia channery silt loam, 0 to 3 43 88 168B Ontusia channery silt loam, 3 to 8 43 90 168C Ontusia channery silt loam, 8 to 15 43 90 168D Ontusia channery silt loam, 15 to 25 43 90 171C Lordstown-Manlius-Towerville complex, 8 to 15 171D Lordstown-Manlius-Towerville complex, 15 to 25, very stony 171E Lordstown-Manlius-Towerville complex, 25 to 35, extremely stony 61 40 61 40 61 40 40 Page 4 of 6

name 171F Lordstown-Manlius-Towerville complex, 35 to 80 76 40, extremely stony 177A Norchip silt loam, 0 to 3 38 85 177B Norchip silt loam, 3 to 8 38 85 181B Mongaup-Ischua complex, 3 to 8 56 45 181C Mongaup-Ischua complex, 8 to 15 56 45 181D Mongaup-Ischua complex, 15 to 25, 56 45 very stony 181E Mongaup-Ischua complex, 25 to 35, 56 45 extremely stony 182B Mongaup channery loam, 3 to 8 58 75 182C Mongaup channery loam, 8 to 15 58 75 201A 201B 201C 204A 204B 210A 210B Lima loam, 0 to 3 Lima loam, 3 to 8 Lima loam, 8 to 15 Lima loam, 0 to 3, lower clay surface Lima loam, 3 to 8, lower clay surface Phelps gravelly silt loam, 0 to 3 Phelps gravelly silt loam, 3 to 8 212A Nuhi silt loam, 0 to 3 81 85 240B Aurora-Angola silt loams, 3 to 8 99 60 240C Aurora-Angola silt loams, 8 to 15 99 60 240D Aurora-Angola silt loams, 15 to 25 99 60 241B Aurora silt loam, 3 to 8 99 85 241C Aurora silt loam, 8 to 15 99 85 241D Aurora silt loam, 15 to 25 99 85 255B 255C 255D 260B 260C 260D 304A 304B Cazenovia silt loam, 3 to 8 Cazenovia silt loam, 8 to 15 Cazenovia silt loam, 15 to 25 Cayuga silt loam, 3 to 8 Cayuga silt loam, 8 to 15 Cayuga silt loam, 15 to 25 Kendaia loam, 0 to 3 Kendaia loam, 3 to 8 342A Angola silt loam, 0 to 3 58 90 356A 356B 357B 357C 400A 401D PG Ovid silt loam, 0 to 3 Ovid silt loam, 3 to 8 Ovid silty clay loam, 3 to 8 Ovid silty clay loam, 8 to 15 Udorthents, loamy, 0 to 3 Udorthents, refuse substratum. 0 to 25 Pits, gravel and sand PQ Pits, quarry 80 W Water Page 5 of 6

Options Attribute Name: A "restrictive layer" is a nearly continuous layer that has one or more physical, chemical, or thermal properties that significantly impede the movement of water and air through the soil or that restrict roots or otherwise provide an unfavorable root environment. Examples are bedrock, cemented layers, dense layers, and frozen layers. This theme presents the depth to any type of restrictive layer that is described for each map unit. If more than one type of restrictive layer is described for an individual soil type, the depth to the shallowest one is presented. If no restrictive layer is described in a map unit, it is represented by the "> 200" depth class. This attribute is actually recorded as three separate values in the database. A low value and a high value indicate the range of this attribute for the soil component. A "representative" value indicates the expected value of this attribute for the component. For this soil property, only the representative value is used. Aggregation is the process by which a set of component attribute values is reduced to a single value to represent the map unit as a whole. A map unit is typically composed of one or more "components". A component is either some type of soil or some nonsoil entity, e.g., rock outcrop. The components in the map unit name represent the major soils within a map unit delineation. Minor components make up the balance of the map unit. Great differences in soil properties can occur between map unit components and within short distances. Minor components may be very different from the major components. Such differences could significantly affect use and management of the map unit. Minor components may or may not be documented in the database. The results of aggregation do not reflect the presence or absence of limitations of the components which are not listed in the database. An on-site investigation is required to identify the location of individual map unit components. For each of a map unit's components, a corresponding composition is recorded. A composition of 60 indicates that the corresponding component typically makes up approximately 60% of the map unit. Percent composition is a critical factor in some, but not all, aggregation methods. For the attribute being aggregated, the first step of the aggregation process is to derive one attribute value for each of a map unit's components. From this set of component attributes, the next step of the aggregation process derives a single value that represents the map unit as a whole. Once a single value for each map unit is derived, a thematic map for soil map units can be generated. Aggregation must be done because, on any soil map, map units are delineated but components are not. The aggregation method "Dominant Component" returns the attribute value associated with the component with the highest composition in the map unit. If more than one component shares the highest composition, the corresponding "tie-break" rule determines which value should be returned. The "tie-break" rule indicates whether the lower or higher attribute value should be returned in the case of a composition tie. The result returned by this aggregation method may or may not represent the dominant condition throughout the map unit. The tie-break rule indicates which value should be selected from a set of multiple candidate values, or which value should be selected in the event of a composition tie. This option indicates that a null value for a component should be converted to zero before aggregation occurs. This will be done only if a map unit has at least one component where this value is not null. Page 6 of 6