Sweet Cherry Rootstock Traits Lynn E. Long, Oregon State University

Similar documents
Sweet cherry rootstocks

UPDATE ON CHERRY ROOTSTOCKS

Cherry Rootstocks & Scions for the M-F Area Lynn E. Long Oregon State University Extension

New Cherry Training Systems Show Promise Lynn E. Long, Extension Horticulturist Oregon State University Extension Service/Wasco County

Cherry rootstock on-going breeding program throughout the world

The influence of different cherry rootstocks on sweet cherry properties

Prof. Dr. Károly Hrotkó. SZIU Faculty of Horticultural Science

Experiences with different cherry rootstocks in Belgium. J. Vercammen Proeftuin pit- en steenfruit (pps)

Pruning and Training. Lynn E. Long Oregon State University Extension

Cherry COST Action FA 1104 Training school «Rootstocks and training systems» Cherry rootstocks. Sara Pinczon du Sel, La Tapy Gérard Charlot, Ctifl

Apple Rootstock Trials in British Columbia, Canada

CHERRY. training systems PNW 667. A Pacific Northwest Extension Publication. L. Long, G. Lang, S. Musacchi, M. Whiting

Bob Spotts Kelly Wallis Delivered by Lynn Long

Sweet cherry production in Portugal. Berta Gonçalves

3. M9 NIC29 A virus-free Belgian subclone of M9 that is slightly more vigorous than most others M9 clones.

Update on new cherry rootstock possibilities from Michigan State Univ. Amy Iezzoni Department of Horticulture Michigan State University

Small-Scale Cherry Production, Big Time Market Opportunities

Apple Rootstocks. John Cline, University of Guelph, Horticultural Experiment Station, Simcoe

Grafting Morphology and Physiology Text Pages:

New training systems to improve the profitability of cherry orchards. Gérard Charlot, Ctifl (France)

Innovative Rootstocks for Apple crop. Nicola Dallabetta FEM (Italy) Australia November 2017

Developing and Optimizing Sweet Cherry Training Systems for Efficiency and High Quality Fruit Part 1. Gregory Lang Michigan State University

Grower Summary TF 172. Evaluation and development of new rootstocks for apples, pears, cherries and plums. Final 2012

High-density training systems

Unit E: Fruit and Nut Production. Lesson 3: Growing Apples

In the case of intensive production systems, the objective is to use a rootstock that restricts tree vigour, induces early cropping is precocious and

Home Orchard Care for Master Gardeners. Jeff Schalau Associate Agent, ANR University of Arizona Cooperative Extension, Yavapai County

Getting fruit trees off to a good start. Bill Shane Tree Fruit Extension Specialist SW Michigan Research and Extension Center, Benton Harbor, MI

The introduction of dwarfing cherry rootstocks, such as

Growing Fruit: Grafting Fruit Trees in the Home Orchard

SOME EXPERIENCES OF THE OBLACHINSKA SOUR CHERRY CROWN TRAINING

Potential Disease Issues in Young Apple Nurseries. Sara M. Villani February 24, 2016 Department of Plant Pathology North Carolina State University

Intensive Orchard Systems for High Quality, High Efficiency Sweet Cherry Production

ISHS International Cherry Symposium 2013

Recommended Resources: The following resources may be useful in teaching this

Integration of Tree Spacing, Pruning and Rootstock Selection for Efficient Almond Production

Small volume : Spanish bush, KGB, drilling

Horticulture Department

EVALUATION OF THE EFFECT OF AMELANCHIER SP. AND QUINCE ELINE AS ROOTSTOCKS ON 1- TO 2-YEAR-OLD EUROPEAN PEAR TREES

Effect of Rootstocks on Growth and Yield of Carmen Sweet Cherry

FRUIT TREES Selection and Site Preparation. Gary Gorremans WSU Lewis County Master Gardener

Propagation techniques in horticulture

Growing Lavender in Colorado

Rootstocks. Rootstocks for intensive pear production. Pear (Pyrus) rootstocks. OHF series

Peach Rootstock Trials Jim Schupp PSU-FREC

FIRE BLIGHT INFECTIONS OF SHOOTS (SHOOT BLIGHT) FOR SUSCEPTIBLE APPLE VARIETIES

Tim Smith; Dana Faubion and Dr. William Proebsting,

2/18/2009. Do you have: Time Space Expertise Realistic expectations. Teryl R. Roper Dept. of Horticulture University of Wisconsin-Madison

dr. Nikita FAJT, Erika KOMEL COST FA1104-WG2/Trebinje, February, 2015

Tree Fruit for the Home Gardener

Backyard Tree Fruit. Chuck Hoysa Retired Extension Agent Fruit Tree Hobbiest

Evaluation and Demonstration of New Stone Fruit Systems

Increasing the growth rate by any means decreases the juvenile period

Unit D: Fruit and Vegetable Crop Production. Lesson 4: Growing and Maintaining Tree Fruits

Pipfruit Varieties For Fruit Growers. 40 years and growing. Quality. Trust. Innovation

Nursery Tree Specifications & Tree Types Description

Training and Pruning Florida Peaches, Nectarines, and Plums 1

Training and Pruning Florida Peaches, Nectarines, and Plums 1

Training and Pruning Florida Peaches, Nectarines, and Plums 1

GROWTH AND PERFORMANCE OF OWN-ROOTED CHANDLER AND VINA COMPARED TO PARADOX ROOTED TREES

Pear Rootstocks. How many trees would I plant? ± 3,000 per ha. What I believe growers need to be doing to be successful in the Year 2012.

SEIBLL HIUITS. HOME OfilIDEllS * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * aleciapt. By 0. T. McWhorter

New Orchard Development: Site Evaluation through Planting. David Doll Farm Advisor UCCE Merced County

2016/17 TREE FRUIT REPLANT PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS

Growing Fruits in the Home Garden. Dr. Elena Garcia, PhD

Pruning Fruit Trees. Vince Urbina Colorado State Forest Service

Training and Pruning Almond Trees

Normally, mangoes are grafted by joining a root stock (lower part) and a scion (upper part). To graft:

Rootstock breeding and trialling at EMR. Feli Fernández

Bernadine Strik, Professor, Oregon State University 1

Enhancing Return Bloom in Apple

5 Rootstocks. Choosing a Rootstock. General Notes on Rootstock Descriptions. Mikeal L. Roose

Quantifying Limitations to Balanced Cropping

STONE FRUIT ROOTSTOCKS

KSU Blackberry Trial Update. Jeremy Lowe and Kirk W. Pomper Kentucky State University

Why Grow Fruit or Berries in Your Backyard?

Training and Pruning Florida Peaches, Nectarines, and Plums1

Bacterial Canker Susceptibility of Peach:Almond Hybrid Rootstocks for California Stonefruit Orchards

DORMANCY, CHILL ACCUMULATION, REST-BREAKING AND FREEZE DAMAGE what are the risks?

East Malling Rootstock Club. Felicidad Fernández AHDB Tree Fruit Day 22 Feb 2018

Viticulture - Characteristics of the vine - Rootstocks & Grafting

Propagation by Grafting and Budding

Apple I. Tuesday afternoon 2:00 pm

UC Agriculture & Natural Resources California Agriculture

Pruning and Training Fruit Trees

TRANSMISSION OF ROSE MOSAIC VIRUSES

Grafting Fruit Trees. Loyd Collett 4/5/2011 1

Optimizing Cherry Production: Physiology-Based Management. Gregory Lang Michigan State University

Horticulture 2013 Newsletter No. 11 March 12, 2013

Evaluation of Potential New, Size Controlling Rootstocks for European Pears. Rachel Elkins, U.C. Cooperative Extension, Lake and Mendocino Counties

Rootstock Options for the southern Sac Valley. Kat Pope Orchard Advisor, Sac-Solano-Yolo Feb 3 rd, 2016

Tree Fruit. Pome Fruits. Fire Blight 1/18/2012. Apples Pears

California Cling Peach Board ANNUAL REPORT-2010 IMPROVED ROOTSTOCKS FOR PEACH AND NECTARINE. Ted DeJong, Professor, University of California, Davis.

Apple Orchard Management

Figs and Citrus for Texas Gardens

Clean planting material - an effective strategy to prevent diseases in grape vines

Planting and Training Peach and Nectarine Trees Southwest Michigan Research and Extension Center Michigan State University draft February 25, 2015

Growing Brambles in the Home Garden

Modern Apple Training Systems. Terence L. Robinson Dept. of Horticultural Sciences, Cornell University Geneva, NY 14456

Grafting of Tomatoes for Soil-based Production in Greenhouse and High Tunnels Judson Reid, Kathryn Klotzbach and Nelson Hoover

Transcription:

Sweet Cherry Rootstock Traits Lynn E. Long, Oregon State University Good Fruit Grower, May 1, 2009 Choosing the right cherry rootstock is just as important as choosing the right variety. This article provides a synopsis of the all the commercially available cherry rootstocks sold in the Pacific Northwest and how they react to Northwest conditions. Colt (P. avium x P. pseudocerasus) Colt was released by the research station in East Malling, England in the 1970s as a semi-dwarfing rootstock. However, in Northwest irrigated orchards it produces a vigorous tree that is similar in size to Mazzard with similarly low precocity. Colt is sensitive to droughty soils and cold winter temperatures. It has been widely planted in California due to its resistance to cherry stem pitting. Colt has also shown resistance to Phytophthora root rot and gopher damage, but is susceptible to crown gall caused by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. In the Northwest, Colt performs well in replant situations where cherries follow cherries on nonfumigated sites. Gisela 5 (P. cerasus x P. canescens) Although the most popular rootstock in Germany it has failed to gain widespread acceptance here. The medium low vigor of this rootstock coupled with very high fruit production has caused fruit size and quality issues, a problem accentuated when Gisela 5 is combined with productive cultivars such as Lapins and Sweetheart. When properly pruned and grown on deep, fertile soils, it may be suitable for very high density plantings of 400 to 600 trees per acre. Gisela 5 tends to advance both flowering and fruit ripening by two to four days and produces a tree that is open and spreading with wide branch angles, though branching may be sparse. Anchorage is usually adequate, but some growers have taken the precaution to support the tree. Trees on Gisela 5 rootstock have shown

good winter hardiness. Gisela 5 does not perform well in heavy soils and needs good drainage. Trees show sensitivity to replant stress so should only be planted on virgin sites or where the soil has been properly treated with fumigants prior to planting. Gisela 6 (P. cerasus x P. canescens) Gisela 6 is the most popular rootstock for new plantings in Oregon. Although it exhibits medium to high vigor, it is easy to manage. Recommended planting densities are 250-500 trees per acre. It is also very precocious, producing harvestable crops by the third leaf with full production possible by the fifth leaf. Due to these high production levels trees on Gisela 6 need to be properly pruned from an early age in order to maintain fruit size and quality. Premium fruit quality is possible with cultivars of moderate to low productivity such as Bing, Skeena and Regina, but more difficult with very productive cultivars. The production of new shoots is much easier to achieve with Gisela 6 compared to Gisela 5 and is one of the reasons for the popularity of this rootstock. Gisela 6 tends to advance flowering and fruit ripening only slightly compared to Mazzard. Trees are open and spreading with good branching. Anchorage can be a problem, especially on windy sites, although most growers in the Northwest do not provide support. It is well suited for a wide range of soil types from light to heavy; however, good drainage is essential. Gisela 12 (P. cerasus x P. canescens) Tree vigor and size on Gisela 12 is variable depending upon cultivar combination. Several years of testing in The Dalles, Oregon and Prosser, Washington indicated that when combined with Bing, Gisela 12 produced a tree intermediate in size to Gisela 5 and 6. However, grower experience with Regina indicates that Gisela 12 produces a tree approximately 10 percent larger than Gisela 6. Some growers prefer the Regina/Gisela 12 combination as they find it easier to maintain shoot growth and ultimately fruit size. It is both precocious and productive, producing early heavy crops, with full production possible by the fifth leaf. Good fruit size

and quality is possible with proper pruning. Gisela 12 is adapted to a wide range of soils and tree structure is open and spreading and new branches form readily. Krymsk 5 (P. fruticosa x P. lannesiana) This precocious, semi-dwarfing rootstock originated in the Black Sea region of Russia. Grower experience in the Northwest suggests that Krymsk 5 is comparable in size to Gisela 6 with slightly less precocity and yield. Production of Lapins on Krymsk 5 through the eighth leaf in Oregon indicates that premium quality fruit can be produced consistently on this rootstock when properly managed. It is adapted to a wide range of soil types, with reports that it will grow well in heavier soils than Mazzard. Accounts out of Russia indicate that the rootstock is well adapted to cold climates. In addition, early indications suggest that trees on this rootstock might also perform well in hotter climates as leaves remain turgid in extreme heat and don t show the characteristic cupping of Gisela trees in hot conditions. Low to moderate levels of root suckers can be found growing from the crown, but usually not in the tree row. The tree form is excellent, with wide branch angles. Since this rootstock is easy to propagate by softwood cuttings and layers and due to its lower per tree royalty, establishment costs for growers are considerably less with Krymsk 5 then the Gisela series. Krymsk 5 is susceptible to prune dwarf virus and Prunus necrotic ring spot virus. Krymsk 6 (P. cerasus x (P. cerasus x P. maackii)) Krymsk 6 produces a tree that is smaller than Krymsk 5 or Gisela 12. In one commercial orchard in Oregon, Lapins fruit size and quality through the eighth leaf on this rootstock have been excellent. Krymsk 6 rootstocks seem to be adapted to both cold and hot climates as well as heavier soils. Trees are well anchored, but there is low to moderate root suckering. Tree form is good, with wide crotch angles. Due to lower royalties and fees, Krymsk 6 per tree costs are considerably lower than those on the Gisela series. It is sensitive to prune dwarf and Prunus necrotic ring spot viruses. Mahaleb (P. mahaleb)

Mahaleb is slightly more precocious than Mazzard, slightly less vigorous and adapts well to droughty and calcareous soils. In the Northwest, Mahaleb rootstocks are generally used only in light, sandy-loam soils as it readily dies out in gullies and other low lying areas where water collects. Incompatibility of some sweet cherry cultivars (Chelan and Tieton) can be a problem with Mahaleb as this condition has been detected up to six years after planting. Mahaleb is attractive to gophers; control measures must be pursued with diligence. Maxma 14 (P. mahaleb x P. avium) Maxma 14 originated in Oregon from an open pollinated Mahaleb tree. However, it has been most widely accepted in France due to its precocity, semi-dwarfing nature and resistance to iron induced chlorosis caused by calcareous soils. In a trial conducted in Oregon on loamy soils, the rootstock produced a tree slightly larger than Mazzard through the seventh leaf when combined with Bing, therefore, it is not recommended for super high density plantings in the Northwest. Production in the fifth leaf was significantly greater with an average of 46 pounds per tree compared to only 2.8 pounds per tree for Mazzard. Maxma 14 shows broad adaptation to soil types and environmental conditions. Mazzard (Prunus avium) Growers in the Northwest have a long tradition of planting Mazzard rootstock because it is well adapted to our soils, is winter hardy and there have been no cases of incompatibility. With its high vigor and moderate productivity, premium fruit quality can be readily obtained. Unfortunately, Mazzard lacks precocity, often not coming into production until the sixth leaf or full production until the twelfth. Vigorous growth makes it difficult to control in high density plantings and the large tree size reduces picker efficiency. Mazzard does well in a wide range of soils, however, as with other cherry rootstocks, it does not perform well in poorly drained or wet soils. Root suckers can be a problem in limited situations. F.12/1 (Prunus avium)

F.12/1 is a vegetatively propagated selection of Mazzard used in many locations around the world instead of the seedling propagated Mazzard. Western Oregon growers prefer F.12/1 to Mazzard due to its resistance to bacterial canker. The F.12/1 stock forms the trunk from the branch union down and the scion is budded onto each lateral branch. The bacterial resistant stock slows the progression of canker infection that develops on the branches and hinders the infection from proceeding to the trunk. Many nurseries, however, prefer not to grow this selection due to sensitivity to crown gall. F.12/1 is more vigorous than Mazzard seedling in many locations where it is grown. Summary The recent availability of size controlling, precocious rootstocks has been almost as significant to the sweet cherry industry as to the apple industry several decades ago. Compared to Mazzard, Colt and even Mahaleb, size controlling rootstocks have given sweet cherry growers the ability to plant high density, pedestrian orchards that afford high early yields, easier management and a safer and more productive working environment. Rootstock Characteristics Tree Size Precocious Advance bloom/ Compatibility Root Suckers Anchorage (%) harvest Colt 100 No No Good No Good Gisela 5 50-60 Yes 2-4 days Good No Fair-Good Gisela 6 85-90 Yes 0-1 day Good No Fair Gisela 12 75-95 Yes No Good No Good Krymsk 5 80-90 Yes No Limited data Moderate Good Krymsk 6 65-70 Yes No Limited data Moderate Good Mahaleb 90 Slightly No Good-Fair No Good Maxma 14 90-100 Yes No Good No Good Mazzard 100 No No Good Low Good

Source: Lynn Long, Oregon State University Additional Reading: Long, L.E. 2007. PNW592 Four Simple Steps to Pruning Cherries on Gisela and Other Productive Rootstocks. Oregon State University. Corvallis.