Light Detection and Ranging LiDAR and the FAA FAA Review and Reclassification of LiDAR systems

Similar documents
Laser Radiation and High Voltage/Electrical Shock. Disclaimer and Limitation of Liability. Shipping Damage. Trademarks

Laser Safety and Classification Full Version (CA-1110) Advanced Version (CA-1111) Basic Version (CA-1112)

DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY. Laser Safety Program

Title: Laser Safety Effective Date: 9/91 Revision: 2/97 Number of Pages: 7

Content. Laser physics Laser treatment parameters Laser safety. by Fotona d.o.o., 2017

Inspection Detail. General Questions for Laser Labs

Replace Light Imaging Detection and Ranging by Light Detection and Ranging

LASER SAFETY BARRIER

Stony Brook University Hospital Environmental Health & Safety Policy & Procedure Manual. EH&S 6-8 Original : 1/00 Revision Date: 3/16/15 Pages 6

Rice University Laser Safety Manual

LASER SAFETY. Class 2 and 2a - low power, low risk Class 2 and 2a lasers have low power and emit visible light. They will cause harm if viewed

Laser Safety Management

*For inquiries and questions about lasers, see the Yellow-Page.

American National Standard for Safe Use of Lasers

The George Washington University. Laser Safety Manual

Laser Safety. Occupational Health and Safety

American National Standard

Staying Safely on Target! Laser Safety. Chuck Paulausky, CHMM, LSO

Laser Safety and Regulations Division of Physics and Applied Physics, School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences Nanyang Technological University

Lasers and Laser Safety

Rutgers Environmental Health and Safety (REHS)

Laser Use at Subaru Telescope (NAOJ) Laser Safety Policy

Laser Safety Part III Administration

Laser Safety Manual. for. Bowling Green State University

Recommended Work Area Controls

FOS 2000 / 1000 RGB 1

Description. Features Standard OC-48 pin compatibility Narrow spectral linewidth Low noise Meets GR 468 reliability specifications

Directive on Laser Safety. NRC Occupational Safety and Health Manual

9 W, 15 W and 25 W Industrial Fiber Laser Systems IFL Series

FOCUS ON LASERS. Philip Campbell RADIATION SAFETY: Principles, Practice, and Emerging Issues March 2018

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

TEST REPORT IEC , 2 nd Edition Part 1: Equipment classification and requirements

PURPOSE OF THE PROCEDURE

Laser Safety Part III Administration

Laser Use Registration & Application (L.U.R.)

University of North Florida Laser Safety Manual. Environmental Health and Safety Department

Northern Illinois University Laser Safety Manual

TEST REPORT IEC Safety of laser products - Part 1: Equipment classification and requirements. TÜV Rheinland Shanghai Co., Ltd.

UC IRVINE LASER SAFETY PROGRAM

Basic Laser Safety Training

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH GUIDELINE

Policy Redesign Project. Laser safety. Table of Contents

CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY LASER SAFETY MANUAL. January, 1998

Provläsningsexemplar / Preview TECHNICAL REPORT. Safety of laser products. Part 8: Guidelines for the safe use of medical laser equipment

Description. Applications Sensor development Methane Gas detection External modulation. DFB-1XXX-BF-XX-CW-Fx-Hx-N REV 004 1

Bioenvironmental Engineering Site Assessment I

AS/NZS IEC :2014

SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY S LASER SAFETY PROGRAM

TEST REPORT IEC Safety of laser products - Part 1: Equipment classification and requirements

Light fright. Improper laser use poses real safety hazards

PART V: WORKING WITH LASERS

Description. Features Standard OC-48 pin compatibility Narrow spectral linewidth Low noise Meets GR 468 reliability specifications

Laser Use Authorization

A. Administrative. B. Labeling and Posting. C. Control Measures. Laser Safety Self-Audit Checklist. Building Room Principal Investigator Date

American National Standard for Safe Use of Lasers Outdoors ANSI Z

LASER SAFETY PROGRAM

North Dakota State University Laser Safety

PENALTIES. All imported products are required to meet the same standards as domestic goods. National Safety Requirements. Customs Requirements

b. Laser Mishap. Any unplanned or unexpected event causing material loss or damage or causing personnel injury from laser use.

CONTRACTOR WHS HAZARD STANDARD LASER SAFETY EXTERNAL USE ONLY

Laser Safety for Laboratory Users

ILSC Workshop. Workshop 6: The Whys and Hows of Laser Safety Training Worldwide. William Ertle & Roy Henderson Course Instructors.

Laser Safety Citations

West Virginia University Laser Safety Program

Laser Safety. This Laser Safety Program applies to the acquisition, use, transfer, and disposal of all Class 3B and 4 lasers at UNC Asheville.

Laser Safety Manual. [Section 2.0] - Procedures: Administration and Evaluation

Order code: EQLA21 user manual

THE UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA LASER SAFETY PROGRAM TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION...2 II. RESPONSIBILITIES...2

This slide presentation has been prepared for Temple University Health System and is intended only for use by it s faculty, staff and students.

NEED FOR LASER SAFETY

w w w. p r o l i g h t. c o. u k USER MANUAL Order code: EQLA15

Aetos Overview. Mistras Internal and External Customers 03/27/2017 R1.4 D E L I V E R I N G A S S E T P R OT EC T I O N S O LU T I O N S GLO BALLY

The Laser System Supervisor (LSS) is John Hansknecht. Extension: 7096

Important Safety Notice

Laser Safety Training

This document is a preview generated by EVS

Recent and Upcoming Changes in the ANSI Z136 Series of Standards for Safe Use of Lasers

UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO LASER SAFETY PROGRAM

Laser Safety Self-Audit Checklist

Certified Laser Safety Officer. Exam Reference Guide

Remote Detection of Leaks in Gas Pipelines with an Airborne Raman Lidar. Strategic Insights, Volume VII, Issue 1 (February 2008)

64 Max IR Thermometer

Laser Safety Guide March 29th, 2016

Western Carolina University Laser Safety Manual

Preface. Consult the current Laser Safety Officer at for specific information.

order code: EQLA08 user manual

Laser Safety Program

Hazard Analysis, Mitigation, and Operating Procedures for (Laser name) Laser

Optech Thermal IR Sensing Solutions Expanding the Industry

Laser Automation &Safety. ME 677: Laser Material Processing Instructor: Ramesh Singh 1

THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS RIO GRANDE VALLEY LASER SAFETY MANUAL. August 2016

Environmental Health & Safety Laser Safety Guidelines

Söderberg, PG Sid. 1(8) Laser Safety. Per Söderberg Gullstrand lab, Ophthalmology, Dept. of Neuroscience Uppsala university Uppsala, Sweden

INSTRUCTION MANUAL DIRL-GL

Fantastic Laser SPECIFICATIONS. Mains Input: Total Power: Laser Power:

cannot be overexposed to laser radiation if there is an effective laser safety program in place!!!

American National Standard

Copyright 2017 by Lasermate Group, Inc.. All rights reserved.

Standard Operating Procedure LIGO 700 mw NPRO Laser in Optics Laboratory

Laser Safety Manual 08/28/2017

Transcription:

Light Detection and Ranging LiDAR and the FAA FAA Review and Reclassification of LiDAR systems February 2014

What is MAPPS? + The national professional association of private sector geospatial firms in the United States. + MAPPS has been recognized by FAA as the voice of the aerial survey profession (Air Traffic Bulletin #2006-1, February 2006). + Many MAPPS member firm principals and senior technologists are licensed professional engineers (P.E.) or surveyors (P.S.), and LIDAR is increasingly being defined by the states as part of the practice of surveying, requiring professional licensure. + The U.S. Department of Labor has identified the geospatial field as one of 14 high-growth, highdemand, and economically vital sectors of the American economy. + The geospatial field is a $73 billion market that drives more than $1 trillion in economic activity. + More than 500,000 American jobs are related to the collection, storage and dissemination of imagery and geospatial data, and another 5.3 million workers utilize such data. + The U.S. Government estimates as much as 90 percent of government information has a geospatial information component.

Elements of a LIDAR System

Scanning Field of View

System installed in an aircraft

3D Point Cloud the end result

Regulation of laser products + Responsibility of FDA in USA (IEC 60825 internationally) + 21 CFR 1040 governs - Safety features Non-removable key switch Safety interlock connection Fail-safe mechanical shutter to obscure output Warning annunciator Emission indicator - Labeling Laser class labeling Aperture label Model type plate labeling - Informative aspects Labeling on product literature User Manual content - Regulatory filings Product Report or Model Change Report acknowledged by FDA via accession number Annual Reports + Internationally governed by ANSI Z131 Specification for the Safe Use of Lasers

Laser Safety Background + ANSI Z136 Standards + 21CFR 1040 Guidelines + IEC and EN Laser Safety Standards + Wikipedia Laser Safety + Laser Safety by Henderson and Schulmeister

Understanding Laser Safety + Characteristics of laser light + Is LiDAR laser radiation is hazardous? + Laser Operating Modes, Laser Power + Characteristics of laser beams + What effect, if any, does LiDAR laser radiation have on eyes and skin? + What is Reflection Hazard and what are its effects, if any? + Maximum Permissible Exposure + What are LiDAR Laser hazard areas safety distances? + Laser Scanner - Stationary mode and Scan mode + Laser classes + Laser classification + Time base + Classification of repetitively pulsed lasers + Classification of LIDAR scanners, NOHD and ENOHD + Design methods regarding the laser class + Examples of laser classification of instruments + Protective eyewear + Laser safety officer

Technical Discussion of NOHD Building on the classification of the laser source as provided by the FDA regulations, the use of the Nominal Ocular Hazard Distance (NOHD) provides a means to ensure the safe operation of airborne Lidar survey systems taking into account their operational environment. The NOHD is the distance from the source at which the intensity or the energy per unit area becomes lower than the Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) on the cornea or the skin. The MPE s are below known hazardous levels. Thus, at distances greater than the NOHD the intensity from the laser beam is not hazardous for unaided viewing or exposure. If one is using an optical device, such as a telescope or binoculars, to view the beam, then allowance must be made for the possible higher intensity entering the eye as a result of the larger collecting aperture of the optical device. This results in an increase in the distance at which the intensity becomes lower than the MPE, and is referred to as extended or expanded Nominal Ocular Hazard Distance (enohd). Thus, as long as the viewer is at a distance greater than the NOHD or, if using an optical device, the enohd, there is no hazard.

Thus, from an operational viewpoint taking into account the likelihood of optical devices being in use by a person on the ground, as long as the airborne Lidar system is only permitted to operate from an altitude greater than the NOHD or enohd then there is no hazard to viewers on the ground. Engineering controls are implemented into the lidar survey systems to ensure that (1) if the altitude becomes too low or an object intercepts the beam at a distance less than the NOHD or enohd or (2) if the scanner fails or locks in position, the laser is shut off in a time interval short enough to prevent any hazard to a potential viewer.

Laser Safety + Laser Safety requires the design and use of lasers to minimize the risk of accidents. + This is accomplished by calculating the MPE(maximum permissible exposure) of the system to biologic tissue such as eyes. + The calculation then defines the class of laser safety. i.e. Class 1, Class 2, etc.

+ When submitting a report to the FDA,the producer must provide an information set for the scientists and Laser Safety Officers to calculate the Class of Laser. + The distance used to calculate the Laser Classification is 100 millimeters or roughly 4 inches from the laser source.

Sample Laser System Documentation for FDA

Time or Dwell Time of Lasers + This is the amount of time the laser system must dwell or be focused on the retina of the eye for damage to occur. + Each system is calculated independently but some systems are.25 m,10,100 or 30000 seconds depending on parameters. + This is important as an aircraft is constantly moving.

NOHD and enohd Zones NOHD Zone enohd Zone Eye Safe Zone

How NOHD and enohd assist in analyzing the real hazard + Laser Class describes potential hazard of a laser system. + Emission to be measured in the near range, typically 100 mm or 4 inches + Real Laser Hazard is determined by NOHD and enohd + NOHD/eNOHD is based on maximum permissible exposure (MPE) at the location of an observer

Why NOHD and enohd? + Laser Class does not take into account the operational parameters (all parameters set for maximum emission 4 inches away). + NOHD/eNOHD depends strongly on LIDAR parameter settings AND flight/mission parameters. + LIDAR parameters are laser power settings, pulse repetition rate, scan speed, beam divergence, etc. + Flight/mission parameters are altitude, speed over ground, etc..

Safety and airborne LIDAR scanners: timing + Laser is repetitively pulsed + Scanner is constantly scanned + Aircraft is constantly moving + Result: - Footprint is usually smaller than spacing - <100% probability of even a single pulse exposure

Safety and airborne LIDAR scanners: geometry + Laser output is expanded optically prior to leaving system - Reduces exposure level at aperture - Reduces divergence + Laser output still diverges - Footprint gets larger - Exposure gets further reduced with flying height + Result: maximum exposure at ground is less than Class 1 Accessible Emission Limit beyond NOHD/ENOHD

NOHD and enohd Scenario s Laser Safety Risk Analysis for RIEGL Laser Scanner LMS-Q680i, mounted on Helicopter Platforms Project: LMS-Q680i Date: 2010-05-27 Page(s): 11 Issue: 01

LIDAR System Mission Aspects LTM OPERATOR FLIGHT / MISSION PLANNING LIDAR OPERATOR CONTROL & ACQUISITION SW/HW IMU / GNSS ALTM NAVIGATION OPERATOR SYSTEM LIDAR INSTRUMENT

LIDAR Instrument LIDAR INSTRUMENT LIDAR CONTROLLER EMISSION INDICATORS LASER CONTROL & SAFE GUARD SCANNER SAFE GUARD LASER SUPPLY LASER SCAN MIRROR

Lidar Operator Manual Supplement Preliminary Flight Planning and Operation Guidelines for VQ820-G, LMS-Q680i, and LMS-Q780 Author: RIEGL USA James Van Rens Date: January 14, 2014 Pages: 6 Copying this document, giving it to others, and the use or communication of the contents thereof, is forbidden without express authority. Offenders are liable to the payment of damages. All rights are reserved in the event of the grant or the registration of a utility model or design. Products that are referred to in this document may be either trademarks and/or registered trademarks of the respective owner. RIEGL USA makes no claim on these trademarks. Text and data of this document are subject to change without notice. The reader is asked to excuse any technical inaccuracy or typographical error in this document.

Additional safety features in airborne LIDAR systems + Mission planning software ensures minimum laser output used - Consistent with successful range measurement - Consistent with eye-safety, and adjustable over 5% to 100% output + Flying height warning: mission execution software warns if aircraft flies below planned flying height - Consistent with capturing the intended swath - Consistent with eye safety (i.e., 3 rd -party interlock based on GNSS position) - Warning when first approaching low flying height - Hard stop if close to low flying height tolerance + Range interlock - Calculates E-NOHD based on laser output selected - Warnings when range data first approaching E-NOHD + Scan interlock prevents dwelling

Key Elements of the System + Mounted but portable electronic mapping system. Moved between aircraft. + Normal and safe operation of the aircraft with or without the system in place. + Pilot, system operator and internal protocols control the operation.

Reclassification Supported + LIDAR SYSTEM design has fail-safe modes for mirror/scanner failure. + LIDAR design and manufacturing meets all applicable standards. + General system design assures safety. + Aircraft integration and operation no different than a conventional camera electrical and structural Field Approval. + User Training Methods in place. + NOHD and enohd more realistic measure.

Conclusions + Systems are designed for airworthiness. + NOHD and enohd determinations are more effective assessments of hazard. + Operational Safety Aspects protect the flight crews, passengers and civilians. + Field Approval is based upon traditional electrical and structural elements. + Installations are on a no hazard basis.

Final Conclusion + LiDAR does not have an appreciable effect on an aircraft s weight, balance, structural strength, reliability, operational characteristics, or other characteristics affecting airworthiness. Therefore, no STC is required.