Celtic Exploration Ltd. Well Servicing Incident: Blowout and Fire August 9, 2005

Similar documents
Shell Canada Limited Hydrogen Sulphide (H2S) Release September 12, 2006

Daylight Energy Ltd. Well Blowout W5M March 4, 2011

Daylight Energy Amalgamationco Ltd. Sour Gas Release Surface Location W5M December 16, 2009

Explosion at Battery Site Date of Incident: Type of Incident: Fatal

Fire Safety Management

SCALES NW EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN

Fire safety policy. Contents. This policy was approved by the Trustees on 3 September 2015 and will be reviewed not later than every 3 years.

FIRE SAFETY MANAGEMENT PLAN

Electrical Management

Gulf Sulphur Services Ltd., LLLP. Hookers Point Terminal - Tank #8 Fires. LEPC November 20, 2013

UNCONTROLLED IF PRINTED. Issued with the authority of the Chief Commissioner and General Manager of Scouts Australia NSW

FIRE PROTECTION PROGRAM

New API Industry Standards for Shale Development

The Gas Company Public Awareness Information Pipeline Installation & Maintenance-Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas)

Health and Safety Policy. Version Author Revisions Made Date 1 Colin Campbell First Draft March 2014

LABC Gas Well Incident City Council Report

FIRE SAFETY POLICY LEEDS METHODIST MISSION. Oxford Place Centre

INTEGRATED LIFE SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING AND ITS PROCEDURES

PASCOE S PTY LTD EMERGENCY RESPONSE MANUAL. (Public Version) SOP 517. July 2015

BUSHFIRE RESPONSE PLAN

TABLE OF CONTENTS Part 6 Legal Basis for Fire Safety Planning... 2

West Yorkshire Fire & Rescue Authority. Fire Protection Policy

Content Rev

IYRS School of Technology & Trades RCRA CONTINGENCY PLAN Bristol Facility 40 CFR 265 Subpart D 29 CFR Emergency Evacuation

Fire Safety Policy. Contents. This policy was approved by the Trustees on 6 September 2018 and will be reviewed not later than every 5 years.

Fire System Impairment Policy

OPERATIONAL GUIDELINE. Office of the Fire Commissioner O.G.# Revision #1 TITLE: ISSUING ORDERS Page 1 of 8

Model Policy On Portable Fire Extinguishers (Ontario Version)

NHS Tayside. Fire Safety Policy

Board Policy 6819 Fire Safety and Prevention Plan

NATIONAL COMPETENCY STANDARD

Fire Safety Procedures and Associated Training

Impairments to Fire Protection Equipment

POLICY HISTORY. RESPONSIBLE COMMITTEE: Domestic. RESPONSIBLE OFFICER: Senior Dean. LINKED DOCUMENTS: Information Security Policy

Training Toolbox Series. ICA11v1.0 Information, Digital Media & Technology

Procedure DESCRIPTION/OVERVIEW

research highlight Canadian Housing Fire Statistics Findings

INFORMATION BULLETIN

EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS & RESPONSE PROCEDURE

Subject: Fire Protection Impairment Program Reference: NFPA (see bottom of page 5) Effective Date: August 2014 Distribution All YC Employees

[Name/title] is the Alternate Safety Officer/ Alternate Emergency Coordinator.

Workplace Safety North

Contingency Plan for Hazardous Materials and Waste Releases

Fire Safety Policy. Document Author: Director of Estates, Fleet & Facilities Management

Initial Version Revision No. 0 Next Review Date: Preparation: Safety Mgr Authority: President Issuing Dept: Safety Page: Page 1 of 6

UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO

UNDERSTANDING ELECTRICAL SAFETY RISKS

PUBLIC SAFETY Nanaimo Fire Rescue 2019 Business Plan

Emergency Management Plan

Health & Safety Policy

X0.01 Emergency Management. Approved: September 27, 2002 Revised: July 15, Next Scheduled Review: July 15, 2014 PROCEDURE STATEMENT

PASCOE S PTY LTD EMERGENCY RESPONSE MANUAL. (Public Version) SOP 531. July 2015

2600SEG103 STANDARDS FOR EMERGENCY EVACUATION PLANS FOR BUILDINGS, OFFICES, AND OTHER WORK AREAS

DUST EXPLOSION CODES AND STANDARDS: Ensuring Regional Compliance and Global Consistency

FIRE SAFETY AND PREVENTION POLICY

STUDY #3 IN A SERIES OF REPORTS ON RADON IN BC HOMES. Castlegar: COMMUNITY-WIDE RADON TESTING RESULTS AS PART OF ITS. PROGRAm

University of Maryland FIRE EVACUATION PLAN

Guideline for Fire Safety Plan

. a facility with a fixed propane storage capacity of exactly 5,000 USWG and no more than 500

SURREY FIRE SERVICE. Construction Fire Safety Plan Bulletin

UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH & SAFETY

5.0 CONTINGENCY PLAN. It is necessary to amend the plan if:

Branch Fire Rescue Services

COMMUNITY WILDFIRE PROTECTION PLAN POWELL RIVER REGIONAL DISTRICT

CAN/ULC-S1001, INTEGRATED SYSTEMS TEST OF FIRE PROTECTION AND LIFE SAFETY SYSTEMS

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA)

CAN/ULC S Integrated Systems Testing of Fire Protection and Life Safety Systems and Fire Protection Commissioning

FACILITY OF EMERGENCY PLAN. (Template)

9 CITY OF VAUGHAN OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO BOCA EAST INVESTMENTS LIMITED

BUSINESS PLAN CEN/TC 305 POTENTIALLY EXPLOSIVE ATMOSPHERES EXPLOSION PREVENTION AND PROTECTION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Joint Responsibility for Health and Safety Internal Guidance for Members and other occupiers of the Scottish Parliament Campus.

LYHA Fire Safety Policy

To: All SAAS Accredited Certification Bodies Subject: Clarification to Emergency and Health & Safety Requirements in the SA8000 Standard

Guidelines for the Safe Operation of Tubing Conveyed Perforating Systems

CAN/ULC-S INTEGRATED SYSTEMS TESTING OF FIRE PROTECTION AND LIFE SAFETY SYSTEMS

ASBESTOS POLICY. 2. Authority. 3. Scope. 4. Definitions. 4. Responsibilities. 1. Purpose. Department supervisors

Rutgers Environmental Health and Safety (REHS)

FIRE EVACUATION PLAN PRATT STREET PARKING GARAGE AND ATHLETIC CENTER POLICE FIRE MEDICAL EMERGENCY

IIPP. Injury & Illness Prevention Program Hartog Drive San Jose CA Responsibilities. Workplace Hazards. Training. Incident Investigations

Setting the Standard in Third-party Certification

Fire evacuation drill

Electrical Safety Compliance: NFPA 70E

These telephone numbers are provided as a general aid to emergency notification. Be advised that additional agencies may be required to be notified.

STAFF REPORT SAUSALITO CITY COUNCIL

Health and Safety Plans Health and Safety Policy Statement Fire Prevention Plan Objective

FIRE SAFETY POLICY. Executive Management Team. Health, Safety and Fire Steering Group.

Root Cause Analysis Report Tesoro Golden Eagle Refinery Refinery Power Outage

Hoeganaes Corporation Iron Dust Flash Fires and Hydrogen Explosion

HEALTH AND SAFETY INDUCTION CHECKLIST

AGT 1 Confined Space. Authorised Gas Tester 1. Scienco Limited. Authorised Gas Tester 1 1

Logbook. Precept EN Fire Detection/Alarm Panel. & Precept EN Repeater

C.L.S.C. AND CENTRE D HÉBERGEMENT DE MANICOUAGAN VENTILATION OF CRAB COOKING BOILERS IN AN INDUSTRIAL SETTING. File: CONSULTANT S REPORT

EVACUATION PLAN FOR THE CLINTON COUNTY OFFICE BUILDING

Enter Department Name Emergency Action Plan

A GUIDE TO THE REGULATORY REFORM ORDER (FIRE SAFETY) 2005 (RRO)

Risk Management Services

Occupational Health and Safety. Radiation Protection Regulation Amended in 2013 Highlights

Smoke detection in hazardous areas:

Fire Sprinklers Working Group Final Report

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN

Transcription:

Celtic Exploration Ltd. Well Servicing Incident: Blowout and Fire August 9, 2005 EUB Post-Incident Report February 6, 2006

ALBERTA ENERGY AND UTILITIES BOARD EUB Post-Incident Report: Celtic Exploration Ltd. Well Servicing Incident Blowout and Fire, August 9, 2005 February 6, 2006 Published by Alberta Energy and Utilities Board 640 5 Avenue SW Calgary, Alberta T2P 3G4 Telephone: (403) 297-8311 Fax: (403) 297-7040 E-mail: eub.info_services@eub.gov.ab.ca Web site: www.eub.gov.ab.ca

Incident Overview On Tuesday, August 9, 2005, at about 4:50 p.m., Celtic Exploration Ltd. (Celtic) notified the Alberta Energy and Utilities Board (EUB) of a sour oil well blowout and subsequent fire about 2.8 kilometres (km) southeast of the Town of Brooks. At the time of the incident, a service rig was on site undertaking a routine well completion operation. The EUB s Medicine Hat Field Centre responded, and EUB personnel from the Medicine Hat Field Centre were on site during the remaining duration of the incident. Senior management from the EUB attended the site as well and provided assistance by facilitating the coordination of the Alberta Government Upstream Petroleum Incident Support Plan. Celtic assessed the incident as an uncontrollable event and implemented its Corporate Emergency Response Plan (ERP). It also called in third-party well control experts from Key Safety and Boots & Coots. The RCMP and Brooks Fire Department responded and established roadblocks. The RCMP and Celtic implemented an evacuation of the area. A total of 21 residents were evacuated. Of these, about 4 to 6 of the residents were requested to leave their home or business. Two people left voluntarily. The balance were people who were not at home when the evacuation started but were prevented from returning home by the roadblocks. Additionally, about 100 campers from the Tillebrook Provincial Park were evacuated by request. The release concentration of hydrogen sulphide (H 2 S) from the well was 4.5 moles/kilomole, or 0.45 per cent. Off-site air monitoring for H 2 S and sulphur dioxide (SO 2 ) during the incident was provided by Alberta Environment, the EUB, and a thirdparty contractor. At about 2:40 p.m. on August 10, 2005, the well was brought under control by pumping calcium chloride water down the well. Subsequently, the evacuees were allowed to return to their residences and the campground. One fatality and two injuries were sustained by workers at the site when the incident occurred. The fire destroyed the service rig. EUB Investigation and Findings The EUB conducted an investigation focused on the cause of the incident, the risk to public safety, environmental impacts, and the conservation of the resource. Alberta Human Resources and Employment, Workplace Health and Safety, is investigating the worker fatality and the worker injuries, pursuant to Occupational Health and Safety legislation. The following findings resulted from the EUB investigation: Cause The blowout and fire resulted from an explosion within the swab tree assembly located at the top of the well. More specifically, an explosive environment that had been created through a mixing of hydrocarbons and air was ignited, but the source of the ignition could EUB Post-Incident Report: Celtic Exploration Ltd. Well Servicing Incident Blowout and Fire, August 9, 2005 1

not be definitively determined. The lubricator assembly had not been purged of air, nor was the pressure equalized with the tubing string prior to opening a valve on the assembly. The explosion occurred at the time the valve was opened and resulted in extremely high, localized internal pressures, causing failure of a flow tee and associated pipe fittings that were part of the swab tree assembly. The failure caused a fire and an uncontrolled flow of sour natural gas and oil. Public Safety/Emergency Response This portion of the investigation was to assess the implementation of Celtic s corporate ERP and the action undertaken to manage the incident. The EUB concluded that at no time during the response to the incident was public safety at risk. While many critical portions of Celtic s ERP were implemented and managed appropriately, the EUB has concluded that specific elements of Celtic s ERP were deficient. These deficiencies relate primarily to effective communication during an incident, especially with other affected stakeholders during the initial period of the incident. Specifically, there is a need to improve public and media notification regarding an incident s status; ensure that pertinent details are communicated in a timely manner to all affected parties, and ensure that on-site personnel are made available to manage logistics and information flow. Celtic and the RCMP requested the evacuation of the residents and campers as a precautionary measure, but it was not necessary under EUB requirements. The emergency planning zone (EPZ) for this well was 40 metres (m). The nearest residence is 0.35 km, or 350 m, from the well, and the Tillebrook campground is about 0.7 km, or 700 m, from the well. The residents and campers were evacuated even though they were a considerable distance outside the 40 m EPZ. Roadblocks established by the RCMP and Brooks Fire Department served to secure a perimeter around the site of the incident in order to restrict public access and enable access by the well control personnel. The off-site air monitoring did not detect any H 2 S or SO 2 readings in excess of the Alberta Ambient Air Quality Objectives. The one-hour average Alberta Ambient Air Quality Objective for H 2 S is 10 parts per billion (ppb). The same objective for SO 2 is 170 ppb. The H 2 S objective is set primarily for odour annoyance purposes and not for notification or evacuation purposes. H 2 S can be smelled in concentrations of 1 to 30 ppb. The H 2 S eight-hour occupational exposure level for worker safety in Alberta is 10 000 ppb. The highest instantaneous peak H 2 S reading detected was 152 ppb. The highest onehour average H 2 S reading attributable to the well blowout was 4 ppb. There were no recorded off-site SO 2 readings attributable to the incident. Environmental Impact There was some oil spray on the well lease, and about 228 cubic metres (m 3 ) of contaminated soil was removed from the lease and taken to the Newell Regional Solid Waste site. This soil contained a concentration of about 5 to 10 per cent hydrocarbons. 2 EUB Post-Incident Report: Celtic Exploration Ltd. Well Servicing Incident Blowout and Fire, August 9, 2005

Resource Conservation The total production loss is estimated at 4 m 3 of oil and 12 000 m 3 of raw solution gas. Follow-up Actions Celtic As a result of the incident and the EUB investigation, Celtic has committed to 1) re-evaluate its corporate ERP and revise it as necessary Celtic will conduct an ERP exercise of its revised corporate ERP and the EUB will monitor the exercise; 2) conduct annual exercises of its corporate ERP with field personnel in all operating fields Celtic s drilling and servicing personnel, including Celtic employees, consultants, and contractors, will also be required to attend these annual exercises; 3) develop and implement safe operating procedures for all drilling and servicing operations those procedures will be reviewed at internal company safety meetings and annually to determine effectiveness; and 4) inform the industry of this incident to help prevent another occurrence by EUB sharing information with the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP), completing a case study to be used in well servicing training programs, and issuing a safety bulletin to industry. 1) The EUB will continue to support the Drilling and Completions Committee (DACC) in the completion of Industry Recommended Practice (IRP) 18, which deals with the prevention of explosions during drilling, completions, production, and other operations. Upon completion of IRP 18, the EUB anticipates adopting or citing the final IRP in a revision of Directive 037: Service Rig Inspection Manual (available on the EUB Web site at www.eub.gov.ab.ca/bbs/requirements/directives/ directive037.htm). 2) The EUB will immediately issue Directive 033: Well Servicing and Completions Operations Interim Requirements Regarding the Potential for Explosive Mixtures and Ignition in Wells, requiring operators undertaking completion or well servicing operations to document and implement practices to safely manage the potential for explosive mixtures and ignition in wells. This directive will take effect immediately and remain in force until new requirements can be written into the revision of Directive 037. A copy of Directive 033 is attached and is available on the EUB Web site at www.eub.gov.ab.ca/bbs/requirements/directives/default.htm. EUB Post-Incident Report: Celtic Exploration Ltd. Well Servicing Incident Blowout and Fire, August 9, 2005 3

4 EUB Post-Incident Report: Celtic Exploration Ltd. Well Servicing Incident Blowout and Fire, August 9, 2005

Directive 033 February 6, 2006 Well Servicing and Completions Operations Interim Requirement Regarding the Potential for Explosive Mixtures and Ignition in Wells The Alberta Energy and Utilities Board (EUB/Board) has approved this directive on February 6, 2006. <original signed by> M. N. McCrank, Q.C., P.Eng. Chairman Interim Requirement Licensees must recognize the inherent risks associated with well servicing and completions operations where there is potential for explosive mixtures and ignition in wells. Licensees must document and implement the necessary practices to safely manage the potential for explosive mixtures and ignition as part of their overall well control, blowout prevention, and crew training procedures. The following interim requirement is effective immediately: Licensees must have documented practices available at the well site for the safe management of the potential for explosive mixtures and ignition in wells and associated surface equipment, and ensure that all well site staff responsible for well control and blowout prevention understand these practices and know how to apply them. This interim requirement expands upon existing EUB requirements for well control, blowout prevention, and crew training procedures to include an additional new requirement for addressing the potential for explosive mixtures and ignition in wells. Compliance Assurance Enforcement Commencing April 1, 2006, EUB field representatives conducting well servicing and completions inspections and post-incident investigations will begin assessing compliance with this interim requirement. They will require the documented practices to be produced and will further interview the appropriate well site staff to verify their knowledge and use of the practices. Failure to comply with this interim requirement will result in High Risk enforcement action. EUB Post-Incident Report: Celtic Exploration Ltd. Well Servicing Incident Blowout and Fire, August 9, 2005 5

Background Contact This serious safety issue is highlighted by the following recent incident. During a routine completion of an oil well, a blowout and subsequent fire resulted from an explosion within the swab tree assembly located on the top of the well. A review of the incident revealed that an explosive environment was created through a mixture of hydrocarbons and air. The explosion occurred when this mixture ignited, resulting in a failure of the piping and the subsequent well blowout and fire. The lubricator assembly had not been purged of air, nor was the pressure equalized with the tubing string prior to opening a valve on the assembly. When the valve was opened, the explosion occurred. This explosion resulted in extremely high localized internal pressures, causing failure of a flow tee and associated pipe fittings that were part of the swab tree assembly. The failure caused a fire and uncontrolled flow of sour natural gas and oil. The service rig was destroyed. There was one fatality, and two other workers sustained injuries. The EUB investigated this incident and concluded that new regulatory requirements regarding procedures for work of this nature needed to be developed and incorporated into future revisions of EUB Directive 037: Service Rig Inspection Manual. The EUB has previously issued Safety Bulletins 2003-02 and 2005-02 for similar incidents. These safety bulletins can be viewed on the EUB s Web site at www.eub.gov.ab.ca/bbs/requirements/safetybulletins/default.htm. Industry is presently developing an Industry Recommended Practice (IRP) to address the concern. Licensees should review the draft IRP Volume 18: Explosive Atmospheres in Vessels, Tanks, and Piping System, prepared by a Drilling and Completions Committee (DACC) subcommittee and available on the Web at www.psc.ca/irp_summary/irpvol_18.htm. The objective of IRP 18 is to develop recommended practices that will help operators and contractors work safely in situations where air and hydrocarbon mixtures are present. Further to this, the DACC IRP 18 subcommittee has launched a Web site at www.firesandexplosions.ca/, which provides information and management strategies regarding fires and explosions in the upstream oil and gas industry. The EUB is very concerned about the current frequency and unacceptable consequences of such incidents and anticipates adopting and/or citing the final IRP 18 within the revised EUB Directive 037. Meanwhile, the EUB is instituting the interim requirement stated in Section 1. Questions regarding this interim requirement should be directed to the EUB Field Surveillance Branch, Drilling and Servicing Technical Specialist: telephone (780) 460-3809, fax (780) 460-3802. Questions regarding IRP 18 should be directed to the EUB Well Operations Section: telephone (403) 297-5290, fax (403) 297-2691, or e-mail eub.welloperations@gov.ab.ca. 6 EUB Post-Incident Report: Celtic Exploration Ltd. Well Servicing Incident Blowout and Fire, August 9, 2005