Userguide Pole Embedment Calculator (PEC) Vsn

Similar documents
Advanced Foundation Engineering. Sheet-Pile Walls

TECHNICAL. Design Guide. Retaining walls made easy with this beautiful solution EARTH RETAINING WALLS

1. RETAINING WALL SELECTION PROCEDURE

This document downloaded from vulcanhammer.net vulcanhammer.info Chet Aero Marine

field note Culvert foundation improvement design concepts The challenge of low-cost culvert foundations

Bearing Capacity Theory. Bearing Capacity

PILE FOUNDATIONS CONTENTS: 1.0 Introduction. 1.1 Choice of pile type Driven (displacement) piles Bored (replacement) piles. 2.

Full Scale Model Test of Soil Reinforcement on Soft Soil Deposition with Inclined Timber Pile

Numerical Analysis of the Bearing Capacity of Strip Footing Adjacent to Slope

Effect of pile sleeve opening and length below seabed on the bearing capacity of offshore jacket mudmats

Field tests on the lateral capacity of poles embedded in Auckland residual clay

Indirect Design Comparison of the structural strength of the pipe (Three- Edge-Bearing Test) to the field supporting strength of a buried pipe.

TECH. BULLETIN ISSUE TWENTY

B511 - RIP-RAP, ROCK PROTECTION AND GRANULAR SHEETING - OPSS 511

Crop Management Details Start from Parameters settings Emergence Planting Seed brand: Settings Parameter settings Hybrid-specific Generic

Design Optimization of Evaporator Clip by FEA (ANSYS)

Soil mixing. An efficient and flexible technology to overcome a variety of soil problems

1 Introduction. 2 General Pile Analysis Features. 2.1 Pile Internal Forces and Displacements

511 - RIP RAP - OPSS 511 ROCK PROTECTION - OPSS 511 GRAVEL SHEETING - OPSS 511 GEOTEXTILE - OPSS 511

GEOMEMBRANE FIELD INSTALLATION

City of Vista Fire Department

Soil-Structure Interaction of a Piled Raft Foundation in Clay a 3D Numerical Study

Alarm Coordination Connected Components Building Block. Quick Start

I N D U S T R I A L Y A R D S

THE PERFORMANCE OF STRENGTHENING SLOPE USING SHOTCRETE AND ANCHOR BY FINITE ELEMENT METHOD (FEM)

Advanced Foundation Engineering. Soil Exploration

DEPTH OF EMBEDMENT OF A SHEET PILE WALL

STA PILE3 ANCHOR PILE DESIGN (USING API RP 2A) WITH SUCTION EMBEDMENT OPTION USER MANUAL

Silva Cell 2 Installation Guidelines

New Software for Simulation of Drying and Evaporation Systems

Sýnishorn ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Geotechnical investigation and testing Field testing Part 3: Standard penetration test

Transition of soil strength during suction pile retrieval

ISO 7010 INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Graphical symbols Safety colours and safety signs Safety signs used in workplaces and public areas AMENDMENT 1

Subsoil conditions are examined using test borings, provided by soil engineer (geotechnical).

Piles subject to excavation-induced soil movement in clay

Stability of Inclined Strip Anchors in Purely Cohesive Soil

GEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! INSTALLATION!GUIDELINES!MANUAL! January!2018,!Revision!3.0! Advanced!Revetment!Technology!

The open-collector sinking output voltage is easily interfaced with a wide variety of electronic circuits.

THE OBJECTIVES OF ROUTINE ROAD CUTS AND FILLS

Test Pit Observation Report. Albertville Business Park 67th Street to 70th Street NE Albertville, Minnesota. Prepared for.

cc: K. Sandefur B. Greene TO: Mark Hite, P.E. R. Powell Division of Structural Design P. Sanders FROM: Bart Asher, P.E. V.

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Testing of valves Fire type-testing requirements. Essais des appareils de robinetterie Exigences de l'essai au feu

C. All components of the systems described shall meet the requirements as stated herein and shall be approved by the Architect and Consultant.

Installation Manual May 9/14 No revision

Gary Person, Foundation Engineer Geotechnical Engineering Section

The University of Iowa Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering SOIL MECHANICS 53:030 Final Examination 2 Hours, 200 points

Cool, calm and collected No cause for alarm on the Grane oil rig

Interfaces with many electrical components without buffering Thermally balanced integrated circuit for stable operation over a full temperature range

Lecture-4. Soil Compaction. Dr. Attaullah Shah

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Fire safety engineering General principles. Ingénierie de la sécurité incendie Principes généraux

5. LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS

815 NE 172 nd Avenue Vancouver, WA Installation Manual

Effect of Placement of Footing on Stability of Slope

Road Soil. Curtis F. Berthelot Ph.D., P.Eng. Department of Civil Engineering. Road Soil Introduction

Patriot Systems Limited

SAFE CONSTRUCTION AND THE ELECTRICITY NETWORK

THERMOSYS 4.3. Getting Started Guide

Research Road Map. 4. Quiet Pavements

Air/water - Heat pumps

CFD Analysis of Fire Characteristics on Subway Junction Station

PULLOUT CAPACITY OF HORIZONTAL AND INCLINED PLATE ANCHORS IN CLAYEY SOILS

GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGNS RAIN GARDEN

ISO 6393 INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Earth-moving machinery Determination of sound power level Stationary test conditions

Avigilon Control Center System Integration Guide

Alternative Crop Suitability Methodology

Advanced Foundation Engineering. Introduction

Tension anchor LTD (Load transfer device)

Drying Simulation the most effective way to save energy

Fuzzy Logic Based Coolant Leak Detection

NTC THERMISTOR SENSOR PERFORMANCE

GEOTEXTILE DESIGN DESIGN GUIDELINES APPENDIX H. FM /AFPAM , Vol 1. Geotextile Design H-1 UNPAVED-AGGREGATE DESIGN

Compact Product Suite Compact HMI 6.0 Overview ABB

ABB Ability System 800xA Alarm Management

User s Guide for the BMP Sizing Tool. Revised December 2017

International Reactor Bulletin 1100 Corporation. Standard and Custom Reactors for the Chemical Process Industries

JULY 23, 2018 PROJECT REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATIONS CASS GILBERT MEMORIAL PARK SOLAR GARDEN CAPITOL COMPLEX ST.

CHAPTER 8 SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS

Adoption of the direct-drive mechanism promises energy-saving and increased workability.

THE ULTIMATE SKIN RESISTANCE OF CONCRETE PILE IN PARTIALLY SATURATED COHESIVE SOIL BY MODIFIED Β METHOD

Time Value of Money and Optimization Process

OVEN INDUSTRIES, INC.

2. References EN 13829:2001. Thermal performance of buildings. Determination of air permeability of buildings. Fan pressurization method.

ABOUT THIS DOCUMENT AND THE DOCUMENT STRUCTURE WE USE

Measuring Couch Motion Accuracy with X-ray Beam Fluence

A comparison of numerical algorithms in the analysis of pile reinforced slopes

C-Bus Pascal Automation Controller 5500PACA. Installation Instructions

Tree Pits Construction Guide

Smoke Layer Height and Heat Flow through a Door

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Fluid power systems O-rings Part 5: Suitability of elastomeric materials for industrial applications

Prof. B V S Viswanadham, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

Attention Items: I. Brief Introduction

Q-tag CLm doc family Type: doc / doc L / doc LR / doc D

INSPECTION AND TEST REPORT FOR ROAD AND PAVING. Area / Location : Drawing No. : Rev. :

OM-CP-Cryo-Temp Ultra Low Temperature Data Logger. Shop online at. omega.com For latest product manuals: omegamanual.

Dam Construction by Stages

Installation Manual. Top of Pole Mount Edition v1.01. For models:

Base resistance of individual piles in pile group

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Graphical symbols Safety colours and safety signs Part 2: Design principles for product safety labels

ISO/TS TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION

Transcription:

Userguide Pole Embedment Calculator (PEC) Vsn. 1.974 The Pole Embedment Calculator is a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet developed to assist designers to determine pole butt embedment depth given a variety of soil and pole loading conditions. The code and model used within the spreadsheet have been developed based on the Brinch-Hansen method for simulation of piles under lateral loading. Although testing and validation have been performed, it cannot be guaranteed that the PEC code is free of errors. The accuracy at which reality is approximated depends highly on the expertise of the user regarding the modelling of the problem, the understanding of the soil models and their limitations, the selection of model parameters, and the ability to judge the reliability of the computational results. Hence PEC should only be used by professionals that possess the aforementioned expertise. The user must be aware of his/her responsibility when he/she uses the computational results for design purposes. Neither Ausgrid nor Foundation QA can be held responsible or liable for design errors that are based on the output of PEC calculations. Foundation Design Process The spreadsheet and this user guide can be found on Ausgrid s internal network location shown below. \\hydrogen\tl-pro Libraries\Pole Embedment Calculator (Internal link) It is also accessible via the BALIN web-site under the Network Standards link, then NS-220. In addition, it can also be downloaded from the publicly accessible Ausgrid web-site below: http://www.ausgrid.com.au/common/our-network/standards-and- Guidelines/Network-standards.aspx page) (external link listed on page adjacent entry for NS-220, towards the bottom of the THE PEC spreadsheet consists of four tabbed sheets Opening, Input, Soil Layers and Results. Enter relevant details to the Input sheet of PEC: Page 1 of 5

Notes: 1. Pole foundation design is an integral part of the design process for overhead pole lines and pole embedment is best established as part of the optimal pole-spotting stage, where ground clearance checks and load analysis determine pole nominal lengths and strengths ("Minimum Pole Length" and "Ultimate Pole Capacity"). A nominal embedment of 0.1 * pole length + 1.0m is assumed for this part of the design process. 2. The "Maximum Allowable Distance from Ground to Pole Tip = A + S + C = 7.48m. This allows PEC to trial successive embedment depths, starting from a minimum depth of 1.0m, until this value (7.48) is reached and if the foundation is still inadequate, the next nominal pole length is selected. 3. Once a suitable embedment is established, load analysis on the pole should be repeated, since moments about ground level and pole diameter at ground level may have changed. 4. Soil strength data is based on empirical assessment rather than testing, therefore "Geotechnical Reduction Factor" = 0.6 (Reference AS/NZS7000 Table 6.2). 5. In high bearing strength soils an absolute minimum foundation depth of (0.1 * pole length + 0.6m) should be used, even if the PEC recommends a shallower foundation. Soil Data Ausgrid s geotechnical data is contained within the Smallworld Scout GIS. The GIS data base provides a code which allows for the identification of soil strength design parameters at the pole site: Page 2 of 5

Enter relevant details to the Soil Layers sheet of PEC. Entry of the Soil Symbol (hm) and the Occurrence (related to the local terrain), automatically populates the relevant soil strength parameters in the Soil Layers sheet: These inputs can be manually adjusted if more detailed information, such as Cone Penetration Test data, is available. Page 3 of 5

Clicking on the Solve button in the Input sheet provides a set of foundation solutions in the Results sheet: Notes: 1. An allowance is made for 100mm clearance between the pole butt and the wall of the bored hole (i.e., minimum bore diameter = pole butt diameter + 200mm). There are therefore no solutions for a 450mm and 500mm bore. 2. The foundation solutions include for three types of backfill: Excavated soil Compacted Selected Soil (equivalent to road base) Concrete (preferably supplied as a premix: Standard Strength Grade = 25MPa, Maximum Nominal Aggregate size = 20mm) Now assume that other underground services restrict the maximum bore diameter to 600mm. Assume also that Cone Pressure and Borehole tests have been conducted at the pole site, the results of which are entered manually in the Soil Layers sheet: Page 4 of 5

Change the Maximum Bore Diameter to 600 and Change the Geotechnical Reduction Factor to 0.65 (conventional soil testing): Click on the Solve button (which appears after any input is changed) to calculate a new set of solutions: The set of solutions allows the Designer to choose the type of backfill, which may be influenced by economics or constructability. Pole embedment depth, borehole size and type of backfill should be noted on the Construction Drawing. In this case, influenced by the practicalities of boring a hole to greater depths in poor holding soils, the most suitable solution specified on the construction plan is an embedment depth of 3.23m with concrete backfill, using a 600mm auger. Page 5 of 5