Suburban life in Roman Durnovaria

Similar documents
Gryme s Dyke, Stanway Green

Monitoring Report No. 166

Chapter 2, Section C: Urban Design and Visual Resources A. INTRODUCTION

CGT visit to Godolphin 11 th May 2016

EVALUATION REPORT No. 300

DUN DORNAIGIL HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT SCOTLAND STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE. Property in Care (PIC) ID: PIC289 Designations:

Appraisal of proposed alterations to the boundary of Helmsley Conservation Area

DACORUM GOLDEN PARSONAGE Great Gaddesden Brief Description Principal Building: Approach: Stable block other utilitarian buildings: Walled Garden:

AJA. Catalogue of Significant Stucco Fragments from a Private House at Hellenistic Jebel Khalid ONLINE PUBLICATIONS

Archaeological evaluation at Willowdene, Chelmsford Road, Felsted, Essex

Odyssey. Product update information January 2013

5 Selecting Sprinklers and Spacing Ranges

Evaluation/Monitoring Report No. 243

Evaluation/monitoring Report No. 241 KING S CASTLE NURSING HOME ARDGLASS CO. DOWN AE/12/19 SARAH GORMLEY

Chitty Farmhouse Extension, Wall Lane, Silchester, Hampshire

Environmental and Landscape Mapping

Timber Venetians Manual

Archaeological evaluation: land to the rear of Clare Road, Braintree, Essex

Evidential value The meeting house site is likely to have low archaeological potential and the building has low evidential value.

Glue Pot Farm, Edwards Lane, Bramfield, Suffolk. BMF 024

Reinventing Ceramics

Conistone Keld/Well/Troughs Project

Archaeological evaluation at Stables, Hatch Farm, Fen Lane, Bulphan, Essex, RM14 3RL

PROJECT SITE The Proposed Project includes the Allen and Pike Street malls between Delancey and South Streets (see Figure 2C-1).

Historic England Advice Report 26 August 2016

69 DRUMLOUGH ROAD, DRUMGATH, COUNTY DOWN

2bPlanning Scheme. Appendix. Conservation - Removal of Structures. Grangegorman

stone oasis collection oasis circle patio (diameter ) instruction guide

Old Town Hall, Market Place, Faringdon, Oxfordshire

Conservation Area Designation, amendments and Review

Lancaster Conservation Area Appraisal. Character Area 8. Cathedral

How we find the sites

Monitoring Report No. 168

Goldings, 67 High Street, Newmarket NKT 076

THE HOUSE OF THE DHOW. by JAMES KIRKMAN.

ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVALUATION AT THE FORMER WATTON GARDEN CENTRE, NORWICH ROAD, WATTON, NORFOLK OCTOBER 2003 (Accession number WAT)

Centre for Archaeological Fieldwork, School of Archaeology and Palaeoecology, Queen s University Belfast.

What is fieldwalking?

Centre for Archaeological Fieldwork Evaluation/Monitoring Report No Monitoring Report No. 201

DEFENCE AREA 18 CRIPP'S CORNER

STRENSALL RAILWAY BUILDINGS CONSERVATION AREA APPRAISAL. In association with Strensall with Towthorpe Parish Council

BROWNFIELD REGENERATION LONDON

Rome. Religion. Romans slightly modified the Greek beliefs in nature gods and balanced it with a very strong sense of realism.

Georgian and Federalist Style Homes

ENVIRONMENTAL AND LANDSCAPE MAPPING

Historic and classic colours. An exclusive collection

Archaeological monitoring at Clintons, Bury Green, Little Hadham, Hertfordshire April 2008

WELLINGTON HOSPITAL DESIGN GUIDE TABLE OF CONTENTS

WELCOME TO OUR GUIDE TO SHUTTERS

Streetscape Patterns. Design Guidelines, Ridgewood Village Center Historic District, Ridgewood, N.J. page 20

Land adjacent to Dingle Dock, Front Street, East Garston

New Media Building, Goldsmiths College, New Cross, London Borough of Lewisham

Historical Value As evidence of Quaker heritage in Wells extending over three hundred years, the meeting house has high historical value.

Historic Property Report

DEFENCE AREA 20 RIVER BRUE: CRIPP'S BRIDGE

New Swimming Pool,West Meon House, West Meon, Hampshire

Pinnocks Wood Equestrian Centre, Burchett s Green, Maidenhead, Berkshire

Northbury Farm, Castle End Road, Ruscombe, Berkshire

A PART OF THE GENERATIVE CODE

Butchers Hill. Greening Feasibility FINAL REPORT MAY 2009 N PORT ST N WOLFE ST S MADEIRA ST. Submitted To: Submitted By:

The Taxonomy of Traditional Surface Design Patterns in Patang

LE CLAIRE KUNST SEIT 1982

Fig. 11. Casa del Bell Impluvio. Sampling areas and colour code.

Gillingham Hall Norfolk

Welcome to our public exhibition

Interim Statement on Archaeological Evaluation on land immediately to the east of the Manor Lodge, Manor Lane, Sheffield, South Yorkshire

Architectural Inventory Form

NEVER ORDINARY. Solid Wood Windows and Entrance Systems.

Assessment of Landscape, Visual and Natural Character Effects

3.0 Area-Wide Strategies 30

Land at Downsview Avenue, Storrington, West Sussex

MONITORING REPORT: No. 276

RIGA LATVIA. KEY FEATURES OF THE CITY Demographic Facts. Urban Figures. Heritage. EXISTING GOVERNANCE MECHANISMS Development and Management Plans

4.0 SOFT LANDSCAPING & PLANTING

Baker Historic District

STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS - RECOMMENDATIONS

Archaeological evaluation on land at Unit 1, Waltham Hall, Bambers Green Road, Takeley, Essex, CM22 6PF

Chapter 4. Route Window C12: Mile End Park and Eleanor Street Shafts

An Archaeological Evaluation at Granta Cottages, Newmarket Road, Great Chesterford, Essex. August 2015

Ottawa Historic Resources Inventory: Commercial Historic District Building Information. Significance and Potential Eligibility

Paving - 8 easy steps for DIY and professional landscapers

Archaeological Investigation in advance of Development at 2 Palace Cottages, Charing Palace, Charing, Kent

ARCHITECTURAL ANALYSIS

IDEAS FOR ADDING HOT FIX CRYSTALS TO DESIGNS. NOTE: Examples used are from BFC679 Art Deco Bling

Fig. 36. Above: Temple of Apollo. Cella exterior, east wall. The mosaic floor butts against an earlier decoration in the cavity.

Sample analysed at CNR. Placed in the same group are: TA1, TA1bis: group 1.6. Correlation: TA1, TA2, B2, TJ3, TJ18: group A.

Knot gardens gained popularity in England during the 16th and 17th centuries.

Houses on the Forest Edge

M E M O R A N D U M PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF SANTA MONICA PLANNING DIVISION

Canterbury City Council Military Road Canterbury Kent CT1 1YW. Title: CA/16/01506/FUL. Author: Planning and Regeneration.

UPPER GORDON ROAD TO CHURCH HILL, CAMBERLEY CONSERVATION AREA

Leicestershire and Rutland Gardens Trust Walled Kitchen Garden Register

HISTORICAL AND SOCIAL SIGNIFICANCE PHOTOGRAPH: M.VAIR-PIOVA, 2014

CHOOSE THE RIGHT DOOR FOR YOUR HOME

5. Bankside and The Borough 5.1. Bankside and The Borough Area Vision

Front Door and Entrance Hall

Walkway position / alignment. Maintains a 1.5 to 2m separation to existing Norfolk Island Pines to provide usable grassed open space.

Epsom Water Works, East Street, Epsom, Surrey

Doors Inspiration 2018

Ordnance Street 110 Plan OS Lot 413 B202; parts of Lot 412 and portion of Lot 413

Transcription:

Suburban life in Roman Durnovaria Additional specialist repor t Finds Mosaics from Buildings 13 and 6 By Stephen R. Cosh

Mosaics from Buildings 13 and 6 Stephen R. Cosh (The cross references denoted SL in this report relate to Suburban life in Roman Durnovaria Excavations at the former County Hospital site Dorchester, Dorset 2000-2001 M Trevarthen 2008) Building 13 mosaics Mosaics found in the 19th century just to the north of Building 13, probably belong to a separate structure, and are not considered here, and in 1963 a cross passage with a coarse chequered mosaic found just to the north west was also probably part of another building. (For a full account and illustrations of these and all mosaics in Dorchester with references see Cosh and Neal 2006 in which the following mosaics have the catalogue nos. II, 165.39-165.42). The western end of Building 13 appears to have been occupied by a bipartite room, floored with a fine mosaic pavement executed in tesserae of dark blue-grey, blue-grey, pale blue-grey and white stone, and red and yellow ceramic. These averaged 12mm across; with a border in red and pale grey tesserae of approximately 30mm (reconstructed in SL Fig. 64, p. 35). The best-preserved part of the mosaic (Panel A) was found in Room 1. Here there seems to have been insufficient space for a coarse border to exist along the eastern edge of the Panel; the restriction of borders to three sides may indicate that the room functioned as a triclinium (a dining room with space for three couches) of the type popular in the mid-4th century. Instead a narrow intermediate mosaic panel (Panel B) lay to the east. As this did not extend to the width of the adjacent panels, it can be assumed to indicate the position of responds (short protruding walls which may originally have supported an arch). Panel C, which lay to the east in Room 2, was only partially exposed but paved what is normally the larger square part of a bipartite room. However, a modern foundation trench had destroyed the eastern edge of Panel A, along with the flooring and/or walls between it and Panels B and C, making reconstruction of the room less than absolutely certain. Panel A (SL Fig. 68, p. 36) In the centre of Room 1 was a square panel, of which only parts near the margins and traces of the centre survived. The scheme was a saltire (St Andrew s cross) formed by triangles on each side of a square frame delineated in simple guilloche (rope-like bands) outlined dark blue-grey with strands of blue-grey, pale blue-grey and white (except on all three sides of the triangles where they alternated with strands of red, yellow and white). Pairs of lozenges occupied the arms of the saltire; all the surviving ones had traces of swastikas in dark blue-grey. The two surviving triangles at opposite ends had unusual chessboard patterns of dark blue-grey isosceles and right-angled triangles. Only a very damaged fragment of the centre of the mosaic remained. It had traces of a curved band of guilloche seemingly interlaced with another which formed two sides of a small white triangle. The probable reconstruction is a poised square interlacing with a cushion-shape. A leaf is all that remained of the filling motif in the odd U-shaped interspace in the arm of the saltire. There were also two curved double fillets of dark blue-grey and traces of 1

rows of white and yellow, perhaps from a central guilloche knot. The square panel was flanked on the north and south sides by bands of opposing stepped-triangles (creating rows of poised squares with serrated sides), and spaced swastika-meander developing two squares on each side occupied by guilloche knots. The whole panel (4.20m by 2.60m) was bordered by a double fillet of coarse red tesserae and, up to the room s wall foundation slots, grey tessellation interrupted by a narrow band of red. The mosaic displayed good workmanship and, where undisturbed, an exceptionally smooth finish. The saltire arrangement is reminiscent of the work of the mid-4th-century Saltire Group, which can be seen on mosaics from Halstock in the north of the county and also features swastika-lozenges in the arms of saltires. Perhaps the closest parallel is from Tockington Park, Glos., and, although superior in quality, it has the same scheme, including the central poised square, as a mosaic from Dinnington, Somerset, which also has a comparable outer border. The Dorchester mosaic may thus be attributable to the same group, although its centrepiece is untypical and without parallel in Britain. The design is very occasionally found elsewhere, notably on late mosaics in Spain. However, this, and especially Panel C have affinities with mosaics from Colliton Park (in the north west corner of Dorchester) and may be by the same craftsmen. The Colliton Park mosaics are datable to the period after AD 340. If this was the case, the mosaicist demonstrates the same ability to elaborate on standard schemes. Panel B (SL Fig. 70, p. 37) Only the edge of this survived but enough was visible to show that it was a band (or mat) of guilloche shaded alternately as in the simple guilloche, but the strands have extra rows of red and blue-grey; this may have been a threshold panel marking the boundary between Room 1 to the west and Room 2 to the east. Panel C (SL Fig. 70, p. 37) The decorative scheme of Panel C was probably a grid of octagons within a square (or rectangular) frame, delineated in simple guilloche outlined dark blue-grey with strands alternating red, yellow and white, and blue-grey, pale grey and white. Part of one octagonal compartment was uncovered, containing a circle of simple guilloche (shaded as before) enclosing a motif probably comprising four inward-pointing heart-shaped leaves with the tesserae laid obliquely to produce serrated divisions between the red, yellow and white shading; stalks from the base linked each leaf to the guilloche circle. Traces of a stepped-triangle occupied the one remaining triangular interspace at the margin. The panel was surrounded by a dark blue-grey triple fillet, which was linked on one corner to a spaced swastika-meander that ran along the western side, and perhaps originally the opposite side. The rectangular space created was filled by a strip of four-strand guilloche with broader-than-normal strands of two rows of blue-grey, pale grey and white except for the central bars executed in red (x2), yellow and white (an extra one results in a rather clumsy arrangement at one end). Part of the coarse outer border was exposed on the north side, having a red band beside the panel and pale creamy-grey tesserae beyond. Although the size of the mosaic could not be ascertained, the room probably had the same north-south dimension as that with Panel A (5.80m), in which case Panel B is likely 2

originally to have had a four-by-four grid of octagons. The workmanship and style confirm that it is contemporary with, and by the same craftsmen as the neighbouring panel. Both employed the same colour scheme and some similarities to the 4th-century mosaics from Colliton Park: notably Panel C and the mosaic of the same scheme at Colliton Park (except there the octagons are not bound by a frame) and the spaced swastika-meander border of the seasons mosaic. It is interesting to note that three features on this pavement are more typical of 2nd-century pavements: the scheme of octagons (as in one from Fordington High Street, re-laid in the Dorset County Museum); the reticulated infill of the heart-shaped leaves; and the differently coloured central bar in the four-strand guilloche (the more normal 2nd-century coloration is employed in the finest mosaic from Colliton Park, Dorchester). However, the mosaic is almost certainly 4th century (probably mid-4th) and this phenomenon is perhaps further evidence for the eclecticism on the part of the mosaicist. Nevertheless, given the similarities of Panel A with Saltire Group mosaics, it is noteworthy that a fine mosaic from a bipartite room at Lopen, South Somerset (another mid-4th-century pavement), is more certainly attributable to that group and has an adjacent panel with a scheme of octagons. A very similar example, found in Dorchester outside the walls at Olga Road, has been set into the floor of the Dorset County Museum. Porticus mosaic (SL Fig. 64, p. 35) This mosaic paved a south-facing porticus (corridor/veranda) 2.50m wide by over 16m in length and comprises six bands of red and alternating with grey running the length of the room, of which the western portion was exposed in 2001. The widths of the bands vary, the grey (seven to nine rows) are generally wider than the red ones (five to seven rows), and is executed throughout in coarse tesserae (30mm). Other corridors and passages in Dorchester with red and grey bands are from excavated townhouses in Colliton Park and Glyde Path Road, both datable to the mid-4th century. The mosaic was re-buried. Building 6 (SL Figs 39, 41, p. 24-25) Building 6 lies to the south-east of Building 13, and the part excavated in 2000 may represent the living quarters at the rear of a shop, of which one room (3.40m by 2.70m) was paved with a mosaic. Apart from small areas at the north-west and north-east corners, its panel was destroyed; originally it would have been about 1.80m square. It is edged by a dark blue-grey double fillet and both corners have small red squares containing a quincunx arrangement of single white tesserae. The squares are surrounded by white; the usual band of white separating the panel from the coarse red border is absent. The panel appears to be centrally placed with broader borders on the north and south sides. The workmanship is mediocre and the size of the tesserae variable (averaging 15mm across); some of the tesserae forming the complete quincunx are curiously tilted. Insufficient survives to reconstruct the design and the corner elements cannot be paralleled in Britain. It may have been the work of a building contractor rather than a professional mosaicist. 3

The Association for the Study and Preservation of Roman Mosaics (ASPROM) is devoted to the study of mosaics, and especially the Roman mosaics of Britain. Further information about ASPROM may be found at www.asprom.org Bibliography Cosh, S. R. and Neal, D. S., 2006, Roman Mosaics of Britain: Volume II: South-west Britain, London, Society of Antiquaries 4

Panel A Panels B & C Room 1 Room 2 Building 13 Mosaic remains Room 3 Porticus Red 0 1 m

This report is supplementary material to the publication Suburban life in Roman Durnovaria by Mike Trevarthen ISBN 978-1-874350-46-0 www.wessexarch.co.uk/projects/dorset/dorchester_hospital/ Wessex Archaeology