Rezoning. Rezone from C-4 and RA to RF-9C and RF-12C to allow subdivision into approximately 47 small single family lots in East Clayton.

Similar documents
Rezoning. Rezone from A-1 to RH to create 9 suburban single family residential lots. Approval to Proceed

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT. OCP Amendment of a portion from Suburban to Urban

Rezoning. Approval to Proceed. City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:

Rezoning Development Permit

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File: Rezoning from RA to RF to allow subdivision into six (6) single family lots.

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:

City of Surrey ADDITIONAL PLANNING COMMENTS File:

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:

City of Surrey ADDITIONAL PLANNING COMMENTS File:

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:

MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT SITE

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:

City of Surrey ADDITIONAL PLANNING COMMENTS File:

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:

FROM: General Manager, Planning and Development FILE: (North Grandview Heights)

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:

Regular Council - Land Use Minutes

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File: Development Permit in order to redevelop portions of this industrial site.

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:

LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL

3.6 Specific Policies and Guidelines

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:

East Panorama Ridge Concept Plan Amendment

OCP Amendment Rezoning Development Permit Development Variance Permit

4780 Eglinton Avenue West - Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications - Preliminary Report

646 Kingston Road - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

Complete Neighbourhood Guidelines Review Tool

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF Gordon Street City of Guelph. Prepared on behalf of Ontario Inc. March 25, Project No. 1507

240 and 242 Finch Avenue West Zoning By-law Amendment Application Preliminary Report

Request for Decision. Recommendation. Presented: Monday, Jul 07, Report Date Friday, Jun 20, Type: Public Hearings

TO: Mayor & Council DATE: April 12, The Planning and Development Department and the Engineering Department recommend that Council:

Rezoning Petition Post-Hearing Staff Analysis July 31, 2018

Southwest Fleetwood Enclave

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:

Stanley Greene District Downsview (80 Carl Hall Road) Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications Request for Direction Report

Duplex Design Guidelines

Housing and Coach House Guidelines - Ladner

393, 395, 397, 399, 401 and 403 Spring Garden Avenue Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application Preliminary Report

CITY OF KEIZER MASTER PLAN APPLICATION & INFORMATION SHEET

Bylaw A Bylaw to amend Bylaw 12800, as amended, The Edmonton Zoning Bylaw Amendment No. 2239

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF. 2136&2148 Trafalgar Road. Town of Oakville

280 Manse Road - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning Amendment, Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications - Preliminary Report

PRESENTED: April 15, 2008 FILE: DP No. 273/ Development Permit No Government Road Townhomes

R E S O L U T I O N. Single-Family Residence/ Church. 2,488 sq. ft. 2,488 sq. ft. Area Parking Required: Church

599 Kennedy Road - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

STAFF REPORT. December 20, North York Community Council. Director, Community Planning, North York District

Bylaw No. B-03/2011 Adopted by Airdrie City Council February 21, 2012

1296 Kennedy Road - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

The petition proposes the development of five townhomes on a vacant parcel between Charlotte Latin School and Providence Presbyterian Church.

City of Vaughan Urban Design Guidelines for Infill Development in Established Low-Rise Residential Neighbourhoods

General Manager, Planning and Development; General Manager, Parks, Recreation and Culture. Proposed Mini-Park and Plaza Designations

Urban Design Brief 1576 Richmond Street City of London

2136 & 2148 Trafalgar Road Town of Oakville Region of Halton

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF URBAN DESIGN BRIEF 721 FRANKLIN BLVD, CAMBRIDGE August 2018

Rezoning Petition Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis July 16, 2018

BRAMPTON FLOWERTOWN SECONDARY PLAN Area 6

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:

4121 Lawrence Avenue East Rezoning Application Preliminary Report

Leonard s Beach Secondary Plan (Alcona North) Official Plan Amendment

RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT / SUBDIVISION AND REZONING CONCEPT AND DEVELOPMENT STAGE PLAN SUBMITTAL NARRATIVE

Director, Community Planning, North York District

7437, 7439 and 7441 Kingston Road - Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control Applications - Preliminary Report

Development Permit Application Form. Property Owner Information as Registered on Legal Title Property Owner Name: Phone:

Rezoning from RA to CD (based on RH-G)

Urban Design Brief Proposed Residential Development 5219 Upper Middle Road City of Burlington

Bressa Developments Limited. Planning Justification Report. Revised Draft Plan of Subdivision and Zoning By-Law Amendment

Rezoning Petition Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis April 16, 2018

From: Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District. Ward 40 Scarborough-Agincourt

City of Grande Prairie Development Services Department

HURON COMMUNITY PLAN

1407 Military Trail Zoning Amendment Application Final Report

30 and 44 Zorra Street - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

LIST OF TABLES, FIGURES AND APPENDICES

PLANNING JUSTIFICATION REPORT

AWH REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT

9-2 Area and Site Specific Policies

DRAFT Northeast Quadrant of Kipling Avenue and Highway 7 DRAFT AUGUST 29, Goals Land Use. The goals of this Plan are to:

ROAD CLOSURE AND LAND USE AMENDMENT SILVER SPRINGS (WARD 1) NORTHEAST OF NOSEHILL DRIVE NW AND SILVER SPRINGS ROAD NW BYLAWS 2C2018 AND 29D2018

Urban Design Brief to 1557 Gordon Street & 34 Lowes Road West

Re: Development Permit Panel Meetings Held on January 27,2016, October 12, 2016 and June 14, 2017

Rezoning Petition Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis March 19, 2018

Rezoning Petition Post-Hearing Staff Analysis July 31, 2018

5959 Yonge Street Rezoning Application - Preliminary Report

BASIC SITE PLAN AND DESIGN PRINCIPLES FOR REDEVELOPMENT OF 114 RICHMOND ROAD

East Bayshore Road Neighbourhood

A Guide to Open Space Design Development in Halifax Regional Municipality

Ensure that development within the Arrowtown Urban Growth Boundary provides:

MOUNT PLEASANT SECONDARY PLAN & VILLAGE BLOCK PLAN. Wednesday, March 5, 2008 Informal Public Open House

CONTENTS 8.0 LAND USE 8.1 GENERAL LAND USE 8.2 RESIDENTIAL 8.3 MIXED USE 8.4 COMMERCIAL 8.5 EMPLOYMENT LANDS

Bloor St. W. Rezoning - Preliminary Report

523, 525 and 525A Adelaide Street West - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

I403 Beachlands 1 Precinct

OP Council Resolution June 16, Planning and Development Services

FARMING PROTECTION. The Farming Protection Development Permit Guidelines are organized into five main categories:

PUBLIC HEARING May 18, 2010 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION

Transcription:

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File: 7903-0275-00 Rezoning Proposal: Rezone from C-4 and RA to RF-9C and RF-12C to allow subdivision into approximately 47 small single family lots in East Clayton. Recommendation: Approval to Proceed Location: 19592-72 Avenue & Portion of 19519-68 Avenue OCP Designation: Urban NCP Designation: Med. Density Res. Zoning: Owners: C-4 and RA John Cusano et al.

PROJECT TIMELINE Completed Application Submission Date: July 31, 2003 Application Revision & Resubmission Date: February 13, 2004 Planning Report Date: March 1, 2004 The applicant is proposing: a rezoning of portions of the site from C-4 and RA to RF-9C and RF-12C in order to permit the development of approximately 47 small single family lots (31 RF-9C and 16 RF 12C). The Planning & Development Department recommends that:

1. a By-law be introduced to rezone portions of the properties from "Local Commercial Zone (C 4)" (By-law No. 12000) and "One-Acre Residential Zone (RA)" (By-law No. 12000) to "Single Family Residential (12) Coach House Zone (RF-12C)" (By-law No. 12000) (Block A) and "Single Family Residential (9) Coach House Zone (RF-9C)" (By-law No. 12000) (Blocks B and C) as shown on the attached Survey Plan (Appendix I) and a date be set for Public Hearing. 2. Council instruct staff to resolve the following issues prior to final adoption: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) ensure that all engineering requirements and issues including restrictive covenants, and rights-of-way where necessary, are addressed to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Engineering; submission of a subdivision layout to the satisfaction of the Approving Officer; submission of an acceptable tree survey and a statement regarding tree preservation; submission of a landscaping cost estimate for the buffer along 196 Street, to the specifications and satisfaction of the City Landscape Architect; and registration of a Section 219 Restrictive Covenant for the landscaped buffer along 196 Street. REFERRALS Engineering: Parks, Recreation & Culture: School District: The Engineering Department has no objection to the project subject to the completion of Engineering servicing requirements as identified in the attached (Appendix III). The applicant should provide park amenity contributions on a per unit basis in accordance with the East Clayton NCP (Appendix IV). The proposal is projected to add 15 students to Clayton/East Clayton Elementary and 8 students to Clayton Heights Secondary. The elementary school is approaching capacity and the secondary school has already exceeded capacity. A phased catchment boundary move to Lord Tweedsmuir began in September 2003 to relieve the projected overcrowding. Future school sites are planned in East Clayton to address future growth (Appendix V). SITE CHARACTERISTICS Existing Land Use There is one single family dwelling on the property to be demolished. Significant Site Attributes The site is relatively flat with Cottonwood and Alder stands throughout. East: Across 196 Street, single family residential development (referred to as the Routley Neighbourhood Plan) located within the Township of Langley. South: Acreage parcels under Rezoning Application No. 7902-0363-00 to create approximately 118 small single family lots, 4 future multiple family sites and detention pond, to remain under RA at

this time, designated medium density fronting 196 Street with a transition to low density (on the north side of the BC Gas Rightof-Way) fronting 194 Street in the East Clayton NCP (Appendix VIII). West: Acreage parcel under Rezoning Application No. 7903-0104-00 to create approximately 110 small single family lots with coach houses and 7 special single family residential lots, zoned RA, designated low density fronting 194 Street with a transition to medium density and special residential fronting 72 Avenue in the East Clayton NCP. North: Across 72 Avenue, residential acreages, zoned RA, designated Suburban in the OCP. PLAN AND POLICY COMPLIANCE OCP Designation: NCP Designation: Complies. Complies. DEVELOPMENT CONSIDERATIONS The 2.3-hectare (6-acre) subject site is located on the west side of 196 Street between 71 Avenue and 72 Avenue in East Clayton. It is designated Urban in the Official Community Plan (OCP) and medium density residential (10-15 units per acre) in the East Clayton Neighbourhood Concept Plan (NCP). The applicant proposes to rezone Block A, approximately 0.74 hectare (2 acres) of the subject site, to RF-12C and Blocks B and C, approximately 1.5 hectares (4 acres) of the subject site, to RF-9C (Appendix II). All of the proposed RF-9C lots are narrow-deep lots and all of the proposed RF-12C lots are wide-shallow lots. A grid road pattern is proposed for this development and is in accordance with the East Clayton NCP. A 6- metre (20-ft.) wide lane will provide rear lane access for all of the proposed RF-9C lots (Lots 1-31) and all of the proposed RF-12C lots (Lots 32-47). This exceeds the minimum requirement prescribed in the East Clayton NCP whereby rear lane access should be provided for not less than 60% of lots within a development to ensure dwellings present a friendly face to the street and car storage and services are handled at the rear of dwellings. Summary of Proposed Zoning The proposed lots and their respective zoning requirements are summarized as follows: Minimum Requirements Proposed Block A Lot Area Lot Width Lot Depth Lot Area Lot Width Lot Depth Lots 32-46: 320 m 2 13.4 m 22 m 325 m 2 13.7 m 23.7 m RF-12C Type II [3,445 ft 2 [44 ft. [72 ft. [3,500 ft 2 [45 ft. [78 ft. Interior Lots Lot 47: 375 m 2 15.4 m 22 m 383 m 2 16.4 m 23.7 m RF-12C Type II [4,037 ft 2 [51 ft. [72 ft. [4,123 ft 2 [54 ft. [78 ft. Corner Lots Block B Lots 1 and 25: 275 m 2 10.5 m 28 m 324 m 2 10.8 m 28 m RF-9C Type I [2,960 ft 2 [35 ft. [90 ft. [3,488 ft 2 [35 ft. [90 ft. Corner Lots 2 2

Lots 2-24 and 26-31: RF-9C Type I Interior Lots 250 m [2,690 ft 2 9 m [30 ft. 28 m [90 ft. 260 m [2,799 ft 2 9.2 m [30 ft. 28 m [90 ft. Proposed Lots 1 to 24 front and Lot 25 abuts 196 Street, a designated arterial road. The East Clayton NCP indicates special setback and landscaping treatment (to be provided on private property) along 196 Street. In order to ensure an appropriate relationship is achieved between private single family residence space and public street space, the applicant will be required to provide a front yard setback of 6 metres (20 ft.) to the veranda and 7.5 metres (25 ft.) to the building face (for Lots 1 to 24), compared to the 3.5-metre (11-ft.) minimum front yard setback typically required under the RF-9C Zone. Due to the 7.5-metre (25-ft.) front yard setback requirement (to the building face) and the 28 metre (92-ft.) depth of the lots fronting 196 Street, coach houses (i.e. units above detached garages) cannot be accommodated, however secondary suites will be permitted on Lots 1 to 24, as per the RF-9C Zone. A 3-metre (10-ft.) wide landscaped buffer will be required within the front yard setback area, for the lots along 196 Street (Lots 1 to 24), and the side yard area for Lot 25, to provide additional screening. The planting material along the landscape strip will include evergreen and flowering evergreen shrubs that grow to approximately 1 metre (3 ft.) in height and one Magnolia, Flowering Dogwood or Cherry tree (Appendix II). A 1.2-metre (4-ft.) open-style fence with cultured stone river rock posts will run the full length of the buffer, on each lot, except for a 1.5-metre (5-ft.) wide interruption to allow future homeowners a private sidewalk connection from their front entrance to the public sidewalk. A Restrictive Covenant will be required to impose the additional setback to and regulate the landscaping for Lots 1 to 25 and will be a condition of rezoning. A 4-metre (13-ft.) wide walkway connection is proposed between Lots 21 and 22, (which will cross the laneway) and continue between Lots 33 and 34. The walkway is intended to provide pedestrian access to 196 Street, a future potential public transit stop at the intersection of 196 Street and 72 Avenue, and a linkage to the Greenway system located to the south-east within the Township of Langley (Appendix IX). Articulation of the single family dwellings, along the side yards of proposed Lots 21, 22, 33 and 34, will be required in the Building Scheme to increase natural surveillance opportunities in accordance with the Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) guidelines in the OCP. The building design guidelines have been prepared by Tynan Consulting Ltd., and comply with the General Urban Design Guidelines established in the East Clayton NCP (Appendix VI). The arborist report indicates that the site is an open pastureland consisting of primarily Cottonwood and Alder trees. 47 trees are proposed for an average of one tree per small lot. Based on the preliminary lot grading information provided the applicant proposes to have in-ground basements on all of the lots. The in-ground basements will be accommodated without the need to cut or fill the proposed lots. The information has been reviewed by staff and found to be generally acceptable. PRE-TIFICATION Pre-notification letters were sent on August 28, 2003, and staff received no comments. INFORMATION ATTACHED TO THIS REPORT The following information is attached to this Report:

Appendix I. Appendix II. Appendix III. Appendix IV. Appendix V. Appendix VI. Appendix VII. Appendix VIII. Lot Owners, Action Summary, Project Data Sheets and Survey Plan Proposed Subdivision Layout and Landscape Plans Engineering Summary Parks, Recreation & Culture Comments School District Comments Building Design Guidelines Summary Summary of Tree Survey and Tree Preservation Surrounding Land Use Applications INFORMATION AVAILABLE ON FILE Detailed Engineering Comments dated February 25, 2004. Tree Survey and Tree Preservation and Planting Plan prepared by Clark Kavolinas & Associates dated August 18, 2003. Residential Character Study and Proposed Building Scheme prepared by Tynan Consulting Ltd. and dated December 4, 2003 (One copy is filed with the City Clerk's Office). Soil Contamination Review Questionnaire prepared by Jim Sidhu and dated July 28, 2003. KR/rdd/kms v:\wp-docs\planning\plncom03\11171231.kr.doc KMS 3/1/04 1:46 PM Murray Dinwoodie General Manager Planning and Development APPENDIX I Information for City Clerk Legal Description and Owners of all lots that form part of the application: 1. (a) Agent: Name: McElhanney Consulting Service Ltd. Address: 13160-88 Avenue Surrey, B.C. V3W 3K3 Tel: 604-596-0391 (b) Agent: Name: Roop Development Ltd. Address: 2989 East 44 Avenue Vancouver, B.C. Tel: 604-644-2381 2. Properties involved in the Application (a) Civic Addresses: 19592-72 Avenue and Portion of 19519-68 Avenue

(b) Civic Address: 19592-72 Avenue Owner: John Cusano PID: 015-368-653 Parcel "B" (Reference Plan 9622) of Parcel "A" (Reference Plan 2430) of the North West Quarter of Section 15 Township 8 New Westminster District (c) Civic Address: Portion of 19519-68 Avenue Owner: Chia Property Ltd. (Inc. No. 370666) PID: 013-229-214 East 15 Chains North West Quarter Section 15 Township 8 Except: Parcel "A" (Reference Plan 2430) New Westminster District 3. (a) Introduce a By-law to rezone the property. SUBDIVISION DATA SHEET Requires Project Data Proposed GROSS SITE AREA Acres 4.99 Hectares 2.01 NUMBER OF LOTS Existing 1 Proposed 47 Proposed Zoning: RF-9C and RF-12C SIZE OF LOTS RF-9C RF-12C Range of lot widths (metres) 9.2 to 10.8 m 13.7 to 13.9 m Range of lot areas (square metres) 270 m² - 600 m² 327 m² - 383 m² DENSITY Lots/Hectare & Lots/Acre (Gross) Lots/Hectare & Lots/Acre (Net) 23.4 uph / 9.4 upa 23.4 uph / 9.4 upa SITE COVERAGE (in % of gross site area) RF-9C RF-12C Total Maximum Coverage of Principal & Accessory Building 39.4% 30.8% 35.9% Estimated Road, Lane & Driveway Coverage 13% 21.7% 14.4% Total Site Coverage 52.4% 52.5% 50.3% PARKLAND Area (square metres)

% of Gross Site Required PARKLAND 5% money in lieu YES TREE SURVEY/ASSESSMENT MODEL BUILDING SCHEME HERITAGE SITE Retention BOUNDARY HEALTH Approval DEV. VARIANCE PERMIT required Road Length/Standards Works and Services Building Retention Others YES YES