The Napa River Flood Protection Project

Similar documents
BASS PONDS, MARSH, & WETLAND HABITAT RESTORATION PROJECT

Presentation to Parks and Open Space Advisory. Committee September 22, 2016

Planning for Staten. Habitat Restoration and Green Infrastructure. Island s North Shore

Guiding Landowners in Stream Restoration. The Science, Practice & Art of Restoring Native Ecosystems 2015

ADDENDUM TO BIOLOGICAL SCOPING SURVEY REPORT, BOTANICAL SURVEY AND WETLAND DELINEATION

SECTION 5: REACH RECOMMENDATIONS/MAPS

Regional Restoration Planning:

North Branch of Cypress Creek Ecological Restoration: A Comprehensive Approach to Stream Restoration

Prioritizing Tidal Wetlands: A Landscape Approach

Tentatively Selected Plan within Harlem River, East River and Western Long Island Sound Planning Region. First Level Costs. Federal Non-Federal Total

Improving Communities Through the Arroyo Seco Sustainability Campaign and Watershed Assessment

Baylands Segment P. 206 The Baylands and Climate Change: What We Can Do COYOTE CREEK

Introduction. Integrating Ecological Restoration of Estuarine Shorelines with Urban Community Revitalization Efforts. Ed Morgereth Biohabitats, Inc.

APPENDIX C NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN: ACTIONS AND PRIORITIES

STREAM BANK STABILIZATION THORPS MORTIMER RECREATION AREA Grandfather Ranger District SITE LOCATION & DRAINAGE AREA

Once Upon a Gravel Pit: Reconnecting Floodplain through Aggregate Extraction

Restoring Water Ecosystems in NYC Parks

FISH RESTORATION PROGRAM AGREEMENT Implementing Habitat Restoration Requirements Of The Biological Opinions

Joint Public Notice. Public Notice Date: February 9, 2015 Expiration Date: March 11, 2015

1/21/2014. Definitions vary widely Legal vs. functional Not always obvious. Wetlands are legally protected by Clean Water Act (1972)

Lower Don River West Remedial Flood Protection Project TABLE OF CONTENTS. Page. Executive Summary

Dauphin Island s East End Beach and Barrier Island Restoration Project. April 16, :00 PM Dauphin Island Sea Lab, Shelby Hall

Baylands Segment J. Bay between the Golden Gate and Segment J. Coyote Point. of For managed ponds. included habitat enhancement.

Meeting Agenda. City of Guelph. River Systems Advisory Committee. Agenda Items. Item 1, 2 and 3. Item 4 Ward to Downtown Pedestrian Bridge

Peoria Riverfront Development (Ecosystem Restoration) Upper Mid-sized Island Critical Restoration Project (September 2011)

Is a Riparian Restoration Still Viable After 100-year Storm Events Alter the Original Design?

Point-No-Point Tide-Gate & Outfall Replacement Project. Briefing Memo 2013

MCCOYS CREEK RESTORATION 30% DESIGN

Design Considerations for Open Channel and Detention Pond Design. Howard Redfearn, City of Mansfield

Coquitlam River Riparian Planting

River Road New Castle Marsh Restoration Recommendations

Green Infrastructure. NYS Department of Environmental Conservation

Imperviousness & Runoff

Your town s subdivision or land use ordinance standards should reference the following street standards, for example:

A Delta Renewed: A Guide to Science Based Ecological Restoration in the Delta

PICTURE CANYON Planning Riparian-Wetland Refugia in an Urban Setting

PRE-DESIGN CONCEPT REPORT GRAND CANAL RESTORATION

VALLEY VIEW POND Q&A. This item will be discussed under the First Reading portion of the agenda at the July 17, 2012 Village Council meeting.

HISTORICAL ECOLOGY OF THE DELTA Emerging Concepts about a Spatially Complex and Temporally Dynamic System

Santa Cruz River Master Plan. Presented to the Arizona Floodplain Management Association Spring Conference June 8-10, 2011

Lilburn, GA STORMWATER BMP AND STREAM RESTORATION IN A CITY PARK. July 2013 Jill Stachura

Stream Corridor Management Plan

Pine Flat Lake Master Plan Update FACT SHEET September 2014

ANDERSON RIVER PARK SIDE CHANNEL HABITAT RESTORATION PROJECT. Public Outreach Meeting June 5, 2017

Bristol Marsh Heritage Conservancy

Rouge River Gateway Master Plan Update: 2011

Zoning Ordinance Chapter 10

STREAM ALTERATION PRACTICES

Jill Stachura STORMWATER BMP AND STREAM RESTORATION IN A CITY PARK. October 2013 Southeast Stormwater Association Annual Conference, Charlotte, NC

URBANIZED STREAM CORRIDOR: COMMUNITY APPROACH TO ADDRESS EROSION

Template for Restoration in a Lake Superior Area of Concern. Template for Restoration in a Lake Superior Area of Concern

Basic Information: Vernal Pool Systems

WETLAND SOD u Bare Root Wetland Plants u Deep Rooted Willows u Coir Logs u Native Trees & Shrubs u Habitat Islands u Custom Growing

AREA-WIDE PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE CIRCULATION

City of Shady Cove Riparian Ordinance Ordinance XXX

STREAM BUFFERS

Working with nature to manage your stream

AT THE HEART OF LAND & WATER MANAGEMENT ON TWEED. tweedforum.org

Conservation Plan. I. Property Information. II. Objectives. Natural Resource Objectives. Sustainability in Practice (SIP) Certified

Empowering Local Action for Coastal Resilience in Massachusetts. Bruce K. Carlisle MA Office of Coastal Zone Management

STORM SEWER OUTFALLS AND CONNECTING OUTFALL CHANNELS. General Submission Requirements

15. Wetlands Chapter Overview Introduction

Restoring Soil Ecology and Native Plant Communities in an Altered Salt Pond Ecotone

Post Construction BMPs

Balancing Conservation and Development on the Jordan River

Fisher Slough Tidal Marsh Restoration Project Scaling Down the Restoration Planning & Analysis Framework to Evaluate Project Alternatives

Information for File # ARC

Boeckman Road Extension

WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON

Study Area Map. Wasatch Hollow Open Space Restoration, Use, & Management Plan. Legend. Harrison Ave East. Roosevelt East.

PURPOSE: The purpose is to provide commercial facilities in the Vancouver and Clark County vicinity.

Riparian Buffer on the Bushkill Creek. Policies

CHARLES COUNTY GOVERNMENT RFP NO POPES CREEK RAIL TRAIL DESIGN

SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR EXTENSION. Environmental Evaluation and Basic Engineering Results PUBLIC MEETING/OPEN HOUSE November 18, 2009

Big Thompson River Restoration Master Plan. Stakeholder Kick off Meeting and Workshop April 12, 2014

2011 ASLA Design Awards. Coyote Gulch Honor Award and Land Stewardship Designation Valerian LLC. Environmental Restoration and Reclamation

Coastal Planning in Texas. Tony Williams Senior Director of Planning Coastal Resources Division Texas General Land Office

Vaughan Metropolitan Centre (VMC) Black Creek Renewal CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

Ecosystem Restoration Business Line Budgeting A Systems Approach

Middle Mississippi River. Regional Corridor

River Corridor Overlay Zone (RCOZ) Article 5

Summary of Changes in the DRAFT Rivers Project Natural Resource Master Plan from the 2001 approved plan to 2014 plan

Zoning Ordinance Article 3

5 TH ANNUAL CAPE COASTAL CONFERENCE COONAMESSETT RIVER RESTORATION PROJECT. Elizabeth H. Gladfelter, Ph.D. Conservation Commission Town of Falmouth

Information for File MMJ Main Stem Bassett Creek Restoration Project

ADOPTED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET ARROYO PROJECTS

50 Years of Habitat Change in the Mississippi River Delta

Case Study 6. Fitzpatrick Creek Cable Concrete Block Mat Ford

Kevin M. Rampe, President -- Lower Manhattan Development Corporation

Caledon Villas Corp. c/o Mr. John Spina 55 Blue Willow Drive Woodbridge, ON L4L 9E8 May 14, Floodplain Characteristics, Old Church Road

Pontchartrain Coastal Lines of Defense Program Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 1

A Field Guide to Common Aquatic Plants of Pennsylvania

Conservation in South Jersey Being Creative with Restoration

Problem Understanding

Existing Conditions and Environmental Consequences Floodplains

DRAFT MAP AMENDMENT FLU 04-4

NJ Department of Environmental Protection

TRCA Field Staking Protocol December 2016

Rockwell Collins Green Communities Grant Application

Chapter 5: Natural Resources and Environment

Transcription:

The Napa River Flood Protection Project Creating Flood Protection and Restoring Geomorphic and Biological Processes Jeremy Sarrow, Napa County Flood Control & Water Conservation District June 2, 2014. ASFPM

Need for the Project: The City of Napa has a long well-documented history of flooding - 22 significant flood events since 1862 and as recent as 2005 Main Street, Napa 1940

Napa 1986

Napa 2005

Background Congress authorizes Flood Control Act of 1965 including a flood project for the Napa River but does not provide funding Needing matching local funds for federal funding, the County proposes a tax to fund a flood project in 1976 and 1977, voters reject measures After 1986 flood, interest in project is renewed and the Army Corps proposes a typical project design in the 1990 s that involves deepening and straightening the river channel (eliminating the Oxbow), rip-rapping banks, and constructing a network of flood walls and levees Design is rejected and community, resource agencies, etc. express concern that widening and deepening river will lead to excess siltation, decreases in dissolved oxygen and a loss of wetland habitat Working over a span of two years a group of 40 agencies, organizations, and over 400 people come together (Chamber of Commerce, Sierra Club, Friends of the River, Farm Bureau, Land Trust, etc.) to develop and propose a new Living River design concept

Principals of Living River design The Project should preserve/enhance habitat, water quality and natural geomorphic functions of the Napa River to the fullest extent possible, not precluding future restoration opportunities, and should remain self-sustaining. Elements include: Restoring the river to a state of geomorphic equilibrium by reconnecting the river to its historic flood plain, maintaining the natural slope and width of the river, and allowing the river to meander where possible Maintaining adequate flows and velocities for sediment transport, rather than relying on maintenance dredging to maintain channel capacity Design a project that minimizes the need for erosion control measures such as rock rip rap. Restore or create vegetative transition zones from the tidal mudflats to the upper floodplain terraces and re-establish riparian and wetland habitat

Napa River Flood Protection Project The Napa River Flood Project is redesigned and approved based on Living River principals, construction begins in 2000: In addition to proving 100 year flood protection for downtown utilizing conventional elements such as flood walls, bypass culverts and channels, raising bridges, etc. the Project includes: Restoring over 1,200 acres of former agricultural and industrial land back into floodplain, riparian and wetland habitat by grading marsh & floodplain terraces, breeching levees and removing tide gates to reintroduce tidal influence; reconnecting the Napa River and Napa Creek to its former floodplains Napa Creek restoration elements include the addition of large woody debris fish habitat structures, reconnection to floodplain and the day lighting of over 150 linear feet of streambed; all within an urban setting The Project also includes a large scale monitoring and maintenance program that involves monitoring the hydraulics and flora and fauna in order to document change in restored areas

Napa River Flood Protection Project South Wetlands Area Downtown Urban Reach Oxbow Marsh and Floodplain Terraces Oxbow and Bypass

Creation of marsh and floodplain terraces 2005 Restoration of historic marsh and wetland habitat Replacing bridges (9 replaced)

C2 East Terrace - Before The creation of marsh and floodplain terraces included the removal of industrial infrastructure and contaminated soils; creating wildlife habitat and increasing flow capacity C2 East Terrace - After Created marsh and floodplain terraces

Veterans Park Floodwall 2008 Veterans Park Floodwall 2014 Creation of tidal marsh terraces below flood walls in urban reach of Project

2011 2011 Napa Creek Urban Reach Channel widened Twin bypass culverts for increased conveyance Stream bank slopes laid back to 3:1 or greater Large woody debris fish habitat structures installed 150 linear feet of stream day lighted (bridge removed) Invasive plant species removed, native riparian vegetation planted 2014

One of many large woody debris fish habitat structures installed in urban reach of the Project Napa Creek - 2012 Napa Creek - 2013

Napa Creek - 2013 Stream bank slopes laid back to 3:1 or greater, bypass culverts installed, all of which increased hydraulic conveyance and reconnected creek to floodplain while increasing riparian habitat in an urban creek Napa Creek - 2012 Bypass culverts

Monitoring Delineating habitat types through the use of high resolution aerial photography and ground-truthing along monitoring transects, Reoccupying 14 monitoring transects and 177 sample plots to survey vegetation coverage, composition, and change in restored areas Surveying extent of invasive plant species to guide management decisions, Storing data in GIS to document habitat extents, change over time, progress towards monitoring goals Fisheries and bird monitoring to track population trends and habitat utilization, Comparing channel design profile with current channel profile to determine rates of erosion/scour and deposition and changes in 100 year water surface elevation

Current Habitat Types in South Wetlands Area

2003 South Wetlands Area Restored marsh and floodplain terraces Freshwater and brackish wetland habitat created Invasive plant species removed, native grassland, marsh and riparian vegetation planted Native flora and fauna returning build it and they will come Created/restored over 1,200 acres of habitat 2010

South Wetlands- 1940 South Wetlands- 2012 Restored over 75% of historic wetlands

Monitoring Native Habitat & Vegetation Communities Mason s lilaeopis Population increase of rare plant 4,810 ft 2 to 8,963 ft 2 Managing Non-Native Vegetation (Pepper Weed)

Number of Birds Counted Bird monitoring conducted from May 2007 through December 2013 has documented 69 species of migratory and resident birds in the Project area. South Wetland Bird Surveys 2007-2012 1800 1600 1400 1200 Black-neck stilt 1000 800 600 400 200 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Clapper rail

Fisheries monitoring has documented over 37 species of fish (20 of which are native, including Delta smelt and Central California Coast Steelhead) utilizing the aquatic habitat within the restored areas of the Project for foraging and reproduction. Restoration of these areas and restoration actions associate with the Project as a whole has contributed significantly to larger regional restoration efforts including the Napa- Sonoma Marsh, Sear Point, and Hamilton Wetland Restoration Projects. Delta smelt Steelhead salmon

Comparison of the original model bathymetry (1990 s) vs. a 2012 dredge survey show only a 0.19 ft increase in the 100-year water surface elevation. Flows/velocities for sediment transport appear to be sufficient such that maintenance dredging is unnecessary to maintain channel capacity one of the Living River original design goals.

Series of interpretive signs developed and installed in 2011 highlighting restoration and flood protection elements of Napa River Flood Project as well as ecology and tidal nature of river and cultural history of Napa

Current Phase of Construction Napa River Overflow Design goals of Oxbow Bypass: Provide 100-yr flood protection Bypass flows > 3-yr flood event Provide public-use areas Habitat enhancement

In Summary.. Utilizing an innovative Living River design approach the Napa River Flood Protection Project has been able to restore geomorphic riverine processes and expand wildlife habitat in addition to providing 100 year flood protection The Project has also stimulated considerable reinvestment and revitalization of downtown Napa For more information: http://www.countyofnapa.org/flooddistrict/