Final Report: Appendix F. LID Driveway Retrofit at Ocean Spray Processing Facility, Middleboro Supporting Information

Similar documents
Final Report: Appendix G. LID Driveway Retrofit and Teaching Tool at Bristol County Agricultural High School, Dighton - Supporting Information

Final Report: Appendix C. LID Parking Lot Design and Teaching Tool at Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater Supporting Information

From and

Bioretention. Matt Scharver Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District. #ProjectCleanLake

Horsley Witten Group Sustainable Environmental Solutions. Rich Claytor, P.E. Janet Bernardo, P.E. horsleywitten.com

SIMPLIFIED APPROACH TO STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FOR SMALL PROJECTS

Appendix D - Technical Design Criteria for BMPs

Inspection and Maintenance of Stormwater Best Management Practices

County of Prince Edward. Stormwater Management Plan. Agreement in lieu of a Stormwater Management Plan

5. LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS

Homeowners Guide to Stormwater BMP Maintenance

Old Mill Community Association Bioretention Facility

SUPPORTING DOCUMENT STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) NARRATIVE

Structural Stormwater Best Management Practices

Green City, Clean Waters

APPENDIX A. Proposed Guidance and LID checklists for UConn and Town of Mansfield

INTRODUCTION TO GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE HOW WE CAN PROTECT OUR COMMUNITIES AND OUR WATERS Maywood Public Library Bergen County, New Jersey

Standards Manual. RIDOT Workshop. Design Strategies: How to Meet Minimum Standard No. 1 July 13, 2011

Introduction to Low Impact Development. Dr Kathy Chaston Coral & Coastal Management Specialist NOAA Office of Ocean & Coastal Resource Management

Stormwater Retrofitting: The Art of Opportunity. Presented by the Center for Watershed Protection

Rhode Island Stormwater Design and Installation Standards Manual

6.1 Bioretention Areas

4.5 City of Indianapolis Stormwater Green Infrastructure Guidance: Bioretention (rain gardens) Bioretention Fact Sheet Bioretention Technical Design

4.6. Low Impact and Retentive Grading

Charles County, MD Low Impact Development (LID)/ Environmental Site Design (ESD) Ordinance & Design Manual

PREPARED UNDER. The 319 Nonpoint Source Pollution Grant Program FUNDED BY. MA Department of Environmental Protection Boston, MA PREPARED BY

Use of Best Management Practices

Post Construction BMPs

Low Impact Development Practices

SMALL PROJECTS SIMPLIFIED APPROACH

WQ-07 INFILTRATION TRENCH

Slow it, Spread it, Sink it using Green Stormwater Infrastructure

The following general requirements will be met for all planter box installations:

Severn River Sub-Watershed: BMP 09-Retrofit

Retrofit of the Gwinnett County DWR Facility Using Low Impact Development Practices SESWA 2012 Annual Conference October 19, 2012

Glencoe Elementary School Parking Lot Retrofit 825 SE 51 st Street

R1a: REINFORCED TURF TO REPLACE GRAVEL /GRASS PARKING ADJACENT TO SOUTH PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE.

Beyond Rain Gardens Advancing the Use of Compost for Green Infrastructure, Low Impact Development, & Stormwater Management

Green Infrastructure and Low-Impact Development Technologies

Patrick E. Lindemann INGHAM COUNTY DRAIN COMMISSIONER. Towar Rain Garden Drains A Low-Impact Urban Retrofit

Low Impact Development. Charlene LeBleu Auburn University Landscape Architecture (334)

Alternative Stormwater Management Practice RAIN GARDENS

Guidance on Preparation of Construction and Maintenance Costs

Case Study: Dallas Green Infrastructure for Stormwater

Placement of the soil should be in lifts of mm and loosely compacted (tamped lightly with a backhoe bucket).

2014 Southeast NY Stormwater Conference October 15, John Dunkle, PE, CPESC, CMS4S

LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY COMPREHENSIVE & STRATEGIC CAMPUS MASTER PLAN. APPENDIX G - Stormwater Study Findings & Stormwater Solutions

Rainwater Management an issue for the 21 st Century. Hydrological Cycle

Final Impervious Cover Assessment for Upper Deerfield Township, Cumberland County, New Jersey

State of Rhode Island Stormwater Management Guidance for Individual Single-Family Residential Lot Development

Low Impact Development (LID) and Bioretention Techniques

PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK CITY OF TOWN AND COUNTRY STORMWATER PROGRAM

ATTACHMENT A STORMWATER MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES Cahill Associates Environmental Consultants

Bioretention cell schematic key

Table 4.7.1: Swales Potential Application and Storm Water Regulation

4. CONCEPT PLAN DEVELOPMENT

Impervious Cover Assessment for Salem City, Salem County, New Jersey

CAPE ELIZABETH, MAINE TOWN CENTER STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN UPDATE

Stormwater Control Plan: Small (Tier 1) Land Development Project

Evaluating Low Impact Development Practices for Stormwater Management on an Industrial Site in Mississippi

Planning, Design, and Construction of Green Infrastructure.

2008 SWMM, 2010 Revision City of Tacoma

Attachment 2: Permeable Pavement Design Guidelines

Standard for Bioretention Systems

Urban Water Management and Soils (ESRM 311 & SEFS 507)

Bioretention and Permeable Pavement Maintenance

Contents. Adapted/abbreviated from GSWMM Coastal Stormwater Supplement, August

Green Infrastructure & Low Impact Development

HEALTH SCIENCES BUILDING REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT

Preparing a Stormwater Control Plan for a Small Land Development Project

Agenda. NPDES Phase II Program (US EPA, 2003 Pending 2009) Costs of Stormwater Management and How to Structure a Stormwater Utility

Type. July 9, Green. Green. and an. storm. ft and took. cubic yards of soil. 31 species. The growth. was installed pound to the well as from

Draft Impervious Cover Reduction Action Plan for West New York, Hudson County, New Jersey

Zoning Regulation Amendments Adopted December 19, 2018 effective date January 7, 2019

ROOFTOP DISCONNECTION VERSION 1.5

Local Stormwater Retrofit Case Studies. Westmoreland County Conservation District Updated 11/2011

Low Impact Development Guidance Manual

LID. Low Impact Development: Protecting Oregon s waters as we grow

Small Project Guidance Document

West Little Pimmit Storm Sewer & John Marshall Green Street Projects. July 7, 2015 Nottingham Elementary School

Low Impact Development/Better Site Design Roundtable

Lesson 2: Stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs)

Rebecca Dohn October 13, 2017

Integrating Innovative Stormwater Management Technology Into A Mixed Use Community

Draft Impervious Cover Reduction Action Plan for West Long Branch Borough, Monmouth County, New Jersey

Draft Impervious Cover Assessment for Fair Haven Borough, Monmouth County, New Jersey

Rain Gardens Water Quality the Way Mother Nature Intended

J. Paul Guyer, P.E., R.A.

LID Guidance Manual for Maine Communities

Urban Rain Gardens: Capturing our local water. Martha Berthelsen The Watershed Project

Introduction to Low Impact Development. Fred Milch. East Central Florida Regional Planning Council

Kearney Post-Construction Stormwater Program

Small Town Sustainable Stormwater Solutions

GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGNS RAIN GARDEN

Green Stormwater Infrastructure Maintenance Manual

Rain Garden Site Selection and Design. Andrew Anderson, E.I.T. Extension Associate Engineer Biological & Agricultural Engineering NCSU

Urban Water Management (ESRM 311 & SEFS 507) Cougar Mtn Regional Wildland Park & Lakemont Blvd, Bellevue WA

Green Infrastructure Overview

Rain Garden Site Selection and Installation

Metropolitan Area Planning Council 60 Temple Place, Boston, Massachusetts fax

Transcription:

Bridgewater State University Virtual Commons - Bridgewater State University Phase II Final Report Taunton River Watershed Project 2011 Final Report: Appendix F. LID Driveway Retrofit at Ocean Spray Processing Facility, Middleboro Supporting Information Horsley Witten Group, Inc. Recommended Citation Horsley Witten Group, Inc. (2011). Final Report: Appendix F. LID Driveway Retrofit at Ocean Spray Processing Facility, Middleboro Supporting Information. Taunton River Watershed Project Phase II Final Report. Item 14. Available at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/taunton_riv_ph2/14 This item is available as part of Virtual Commons, the open-access institutional repository of Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, Massachusetts.

APPENDIX F. LID DRIVEWAY RETROFIT AT OCEAN SPRAY PROCESSING FACILITY, MIDDLEBORO - SUPPORTING INFORMATION

MEMORANDUM TO: Pauline Jeong, Sustainability Manager, Ocean Spray Cranberries Robert Mullennix, Environmental Health and Safety Manager, Ocean Spray Cranberries Mark Rapoza, Technical Services Manager, Middleboro Plant, Ocean Spray Cranberries FROM: Richard A. Claytor, Jr., P.E., Principal Engineer Ellie Baker, Project Manager DATE: December 17, 2009 RE: Demonstration Projects at Ocean Spray Cranberries Middleboro Processing Plant Taunton River Watershed Management Plan As you know, staff of the Horsley Witten Group, Inc (HW) and the Nature Conservancy (TNC) met with you back in late September of this year in your Headquarters office to discuss the goals of the Taunton River Watershed Management project and to see if Ocean Spray Cranberries might be interested in participating as one of our watershed demonstration projects. We then met again in late October and participated in a tour of the Middleboro Processing Plant grounds to review potential project options for demonstration of so-called low impact development (LID) stormwater management measures at the Middleboro Processing Plant. We also discussed the possibility of capturing rooftop rainfall for re-use as make-up coolant water. We later met directly with Mr. Rapoza in early November to review some drainage plans of the plant and view the plant rooftop and roof drainage system. Based on these meetings and tours, HW agreed to develop a list of potential projects and locations for further consideration by Ocean Spray Cranberries. This memorandum serves to present you with that list of potential projects. We have identified five separate potential LID locations on the plant with a variety of drainage characteristics and one rooftop capture/re-use location (see attached figure). Sites were identified based on current drainage patterns and the potential to offer improved stormwater management for the contributing drainage area. The LID stormwater management approach is designed to capture and manage runoff from relatively small areas and uses a natural approach to treat, and where feasible, infiltrate stormwater into the underlying soils. Each of the five identified locations employs a basic strategy of collecting roadway and/or parking lot runoff and providing water quality treatment in one of three LID practices: a vegetative swale, a bioretention system (also sometimes referred to as a rain garden), or a constructed wetland. The

Ocean Spray Cranberries December 17, 2009 Page 2 vegetative swales would consist of an organic-rich soil supporting a range of herbaceous and woody vegetation, and depending on the groundwater elevations, may or may not have an underdrain pipe system. Bioretention is an alternative stormwater management practice that uses a soil matrix and landscaping to filter stormwater pollutants and, where possible, infiltrate into the underlying soils. The constructed wetland practice supports a shallow permanent pool of water and a range of emergent vegetation (see photos below). Example of Bio-Swale Draining Residential Roadway Example of Bioretention Draining Parking Lot Example of Constructed Wetland Draining Highway Potential Demonstration Sites The general concept and approximate size of the project for each of the five sites are presented below. Site 1: This area drains a large parking lot that appears to be underutilized employee parking and that currently flows to one of two catchbasins. The proposed concept would be to reconfigure H:\Projects\2008\8123 Taunton River WS PH II\Task 6 Final Report\Appendices\Ocean Spray\091217_Ocean Spray Memo_8123.doc

Ocean Spray Cranberries December 17, 2009 Page 3 the drainage so that it would first flow into a bioretention facility and overflow in the catchbasins. The design might require the removal or reconfiguration of a few to several parking spaces and occupy an area of approximately 1,200 to 1,400 square feet. Site 1: Bioretention Area Within Center of Parking Lot Site 2: This site drains a portion of the entrance road and adjacent impervious area that is serving as an existing storage area for cranberry crates. An existing grass swale of approximately 475 feet drains this area. The concept would be to convert this turf grass to a mix of herbaceous and woody vegetation and add organic soil, thus allowing for longer stormwater residence time and more effective stormwater treatment. Site 2: Grass Swale at Entrance Driveway Site 3: This area drains runoff from the loading dock and rooftop near the main entrance. We propose to convert the existing grass swale to a vegetated swale with a mix of herbaceous and woody species and other aquatic features (such as boulders and small pool areas). The length of the swale would be approximately 200 feet. H:\Projects\2008\8123 Taunton River WS PH II\Task 6 Final Report\Appendices\Ocean Spray\091217_Ocean Spray Memo_8123.doc

Ocean Spray Cranberries December 17, 2009 Page 4 Site 3: Grass Swale Draining Loading Dock Near Main Entrance Site 4: This area drains runoff from the parking lot in front of the main entrance. The existing grass swale could be modified to utilize a bioretention soil matrix to support a mix of trees, shrubs and perennials. The approximate surface area of the facility could be as much as 3,000 square feet. Site 4: Main Parking Lot: Existing Grass Swale Site 5: This area drains runoff from the driveway and adjacent overflow parking lot. The area appears to be wet with shallow depth to groundwater. The concept would be to design this as a constructed wetland with a shallow permanent pool and mix of emergent wetland vegetation. H:\Projects\2008\8123 Taunton River WS PH II\Task 6 Final Report\Appendices\Ocean Spray\091217_Ocean Spray Memo_8123.doc

Ocean Spray Cranberries December 17, 2009 Page 5 Site 5: Existing Low-lying Area Draining Driveway and Parking Lot Additional Project Site and Concept In addition, we discussed the possibility of using rainfall from the rooftop drainage system as make-up water for one or more of the cooling systems or for some other non-potable use. HW reviewed the mechanical drawings for a portion of the facility s roof (Receiving Facility, dated 11/17/8?). This rooftop precipitation is collected in a series of risers that discharge to the existing storm drain system to the southwest corner approximately 9 feet below grade. Possible Cistern Location (far southeast of facility) Based on the current piping arrangement, it would be difficult to capture this water and direct it to a storage facility, and would require pumping in order to direct the water to another location for re-use. However, it is our understanding that in the near future, this rooftop and drainage system may be completely overhauled at which time it might be cost effective to direct water to a large holding tank for re-use. There is a relatively level grass area immediately adjacent to the H:\Projects\2008\8123 Taunton River WS PH II\Task 6 Final Report\Appendices\Ocean Spray\091217_Ocean Spray Memo_8123.doc

Ocean Spray Cranberries December 17, 2009 Page 6 existing refrigerated building (far southeast corner) that might serve as an ideal location for either an above ground, or below ground storage tank. Next Steps: Site and Project Selection Based on our initial assessment of the Middleboro Processing Plant, it seems that there are several options for the installation of one or more LID demonstration projects in the near-term. Depending on the schedule for roof replacement work and whether or not the existing drainage system is contemplated for overhaul, it seems possible that a rainfall re-use project would be feasible in the longer-term. Please review the attached map and this memo and let us know if you are interested in pursuing any of these potential projects further. We would like to move forward with one of the five demonstration projects listed above, or possibly two if they are located adjacent to one another. At this time, we do not believe that the roof runoff re-use project would fit within our current scope of work and budget within the Taunton River Watershed Management Plan project, but would be happy to explore this project with you further in addition the selected demonstration project. If you have any questions or you would like more information on the various stormwater management options, please do not hesitate to contact Rich Claytor at 508-833-6600 or Ellie Baker at 978-499-0601. We hope to be in a position to move forward with the initial design process before February 1, 2010. We look forward hearing your project selection in the meantime. Thank you again for meeting with us, conducting the tours of your facility and in your interest in this project. H:\Projects\2008\8123 Taunton River WS PH II\Task 6 Final Report\Appendices\Ocean Spray\091217_Ocean Spray Memo_8123.doc

ITEM NUMBER TAUNTON RIVER WATERSHED PLAN - OCEAN SPRAY CRANBERRIES, INC. MIDDLEBORO, MA DRY SWALE 75% DESIGN PLANS CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE 10/14/2010 DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL AMOUNT 1.0 MOBILIZATION/DEMOBILIZATION 1 LUMP SUM $2,000.00 $2,000 2.0 EARTH EXCAVATION 90 CUBIC YARD $25.00 $2,250 3.0 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXCESS SOIL 60 CUBIC YARD $10.00 $600 4.0 EXCAVATE & RELOCATE MATERIAL 30 CUBIC YARD $4.00 $120 5.0 COMPACTED BERM FILL 12 CUBIC YARD $60.00 $720 6.0 RIPRAP STONE 20 CUBIC YARD $85.00 $1,700 7.0 BITUMINOUS ASPHALT PAVEMENT (3") 85 SQUARE YARD $22.00 $1,870 8.0 GRAVEL FOR PAVEMENT (6") 14 CUBIC YARD $18.00 $252 9.0 LOAM & SEED (GRASS) 600 SQUARE YARD $9.00 $5,400 10.0 CRUSHED STONE 15 CUBIC YARD $50.00 $750 11.0 DRY SWALE FILTER MEDIA 25 CUBIC YARD $35.00 $875 12.0 PEA GRAVEL 8 CUBIC YARD $35.00 $280 13.0 2" PVC DRAINAGE PIPE 10 LINEAR FOOT $15.00 $150 14.0 PANEL PIPE UNDERDRAIN 530 LINEAR FOOT $20.00 $10,600 15.0 FOREBAY STANDPIPE 1 EACH $150.00 $150 16.0 PRECAST OUTLET STRUCTURES 2 EACH $3,100.00 $6,200 17.0 CLEANOUTS 3 EACH $100.00 $300 18.0 SILT SOCK 500 LINEAR FOOT $6.00 $3,000 19.0 FILTER FABRIC 2,800 SQUARE FOOT $0.50 $1,400 20.0 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET 600 SQUARE YARD $8.00 $4,800 21.0 SURVEY CONSTRUCTION LAYOUT 1 LUMP SUM $2,000.00 $2,000 22.0 LANDSCAPING (PER PLANS) 1 LUMP SUM $70,400.00 $70,400 23.0 EROSION/SEDIMENT CONTROL 1 LUMP SUM $2,500.00 $2,500 SUB TOTAL $118,317 Prepared by: Horsley Witten Group, Inc. Page 1 of 2

ESTIMATED BID PRICE $ 119,000 Owner Contingency 30% $ 36,000 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION BUDGET $ 155,000 NOTES: CONTINGENCY IS PROVIDED BASED ON 75% DESIGN PLANS REFLECTING THE FACT THAT UNCERTAINTY EXISTS BETWEEN THIS STAGE AND CONSTRUCTION STAGE DRAWINGS. CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATES WILL BE DEPENDANT ON FACTORS RESOLVED AT THE CONSTRUCTION BIDDING STAGE. Prepared by: Horsley Witten Group, Inc. Page 2 of 2