Iowa s Statewide Urban Design Standards Promote Improved Access Management

Similar documents
master plan of highways bus rapid transit amendment

I. INTRODUCTION. Project Background and Study Area

COLVER ROAD INDUSTRIAL CONCEPT PLAN

TENNESSEE STATE ROUTE 109 CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT ALONG STATE ROUTE 109

CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA

Transportation Systems and Utility Infrastructure

IOWA HIGHWAY 57 / WEST 1 ST STREET STUDY PUBLIC INFORMATIONAL MEETING APRIL 22, 2014

Public Hearing. Charlotte County-Punta Gorda MPO - Meeting Rooms A and B March 14, open house at 4 p.m., formal presentation at 5 p.m.

DRAFT Subject to Modifications

The Illinois Department of Transportation and Lake County Division of Transportation. Route 173, including the Millburn Bypass

PREPARED FOR: PLATTEVIEW ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Route 1 Corridor Study

PROJECT STATEMENT LOCATION/DESIGN PUBLIC HEARING. 19 th AVENUE NORTH EXTENSION PROJECT FROM SPRINGDALE DRIVE TO NORTH 2 ND STREET/U.S.

This page left intentionally blank.

FDOT D4 Complete Streets

TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M. To: Council Members AGENDA ITEM 5H

Appendix I. Access Management & Land Use Zoning Strategies Memo

Streets for People, Place-Making and Prosperity. #TOcompletestreets

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 TH 14 WEST STUDY AREA Project Description Functional Classification Purpose of the Project

Planning Roles. Responsibilities

Section 1. Executive Summary

Transport Planning And Design Manual Volume 2 Chapter 3

Scope of Services. River Oaks Boulevard (SH 183) Corridor Master Plan

John M. Fleming Managing Director, Planning and City Planner. Old East Village Dundas Street Corridor Secondary Plan Draft Terms of Reference

Aashto Maintenance Manual For Roadways And Bridges Full Online

Chapter 14: Community Services and Public Utilities

PSRC REVIEW REPORT & CERTIFICATION RECOMMENDATION

Lesson 6. Corridor Planning

Creating a Supportive Organizational and Policy Framework Luisa Paiewonsky. John D. Pagini, AICP USDOT CCAPA PDO

WILDFLOWER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Bypass #16 - Bend Parkway (new alignment for US 97) (MP )

CHAPTER 1 Introduction

NASSAU COUNTY TOWN HALL NEW YORK & CONNECTICUT SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES. A Unique Bi-State Partnership to Improve Jobs, Housing and Transportation

ARGENTA TRAIL (CSAH 28/63) REALIGNMENT SOUTH PROJECT (CP 63-25)

MODEL ACCESS MANAGEMENT PLAN MINNESOTA TRUNK HIGHWAY 7 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (HUTCHINSON SEGMENT)

SECTION 4(f) DE MINIMIS DOCUMENTATION

May U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration

Local Access Management. Brent Sweger, P.E. Division of Planning Kentucky Transportation Cabinet June 2, 2006

Planning Commission Report

British Columbia Landscape Standard. Published by:

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. Submitted by: Eric Angstadt, Director, Planning and Development

master plan of highways

9 CITY OF VAUGHAN OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO BOCA EAST INVESTMENTS LIMITED

Executive Summary. NY 7 / NY 2 Corridor

The transportation system in a community is an

RFP REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS CITY OF PORTSMOUTH, NH. DESIGN ENGINEERING SERVICES North Mill Pond Trail and Greenway

Presentation Item C Annotated Model Outline for a Framework for a Green Infrastructure Plan

1.0 Introduction. Purpose and Basis for Updating the TMP. Introduction 1

Project Overview. Get Involved. Public Information Meeting. Contact Information

The Village of Sugar Grove, in partnership with Kane County, the Illinois Department of Transportation, and the Illinois Tollway welcomes you to the

Appendix A. Summary of Key Findings: US Hwy Corridor Study. Retail-Commercial Development Plan Page A-1

Public input has been an important part of the plan development process.

SH 199 Corridor Master Plan. Community Meeting No. 2 May 31, 2017

ITEM # _ 41 _ DATE: COUNCIL ACTION FORM MAJOR FINAL PLAT FOR MENARDS SUBDIVISION BACKGROUND:

Capital Projects impacting Odenton Town Center

INTRODUCTION NORTH HEYBRIDGE GARDEN SUBURB

Project Overview. Fairfax County Parkway Widening Fairfax County. Get Involved. Public Information Meeting. Contact Information

Urban Planning and Land Use

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of January 28, 2017 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT-2

The Ambassador Bridge/ Gateway Project

City of Ann Arbor Page 1

Mississippi Skyway Preliminary Engineering Report

12 AMENDMENT NO. 149, TOWN OF MARKHAM HIGHWAY 404 NORTH SECONDARY PLAN

3. VISION AND GOALS. Vision Statement. Goals, Objectives and Policies

1INTRODUCTION. Purpose of the Truckee Railyard Master Plan

13 Extending the Esri Enterprise Licence Agreement

What s New in Roundabout Design?

Prepared by: Casey Kempenaar, Senior Planner

Iowa 100 Extension Project Visualizations for Design and Public Involvement ASCE Transportation Conference November 6, 2013 Ames, Iowa

A Claustrophobic Corridor Grows Up

WELCOME NEIGHBORS! April 11, 2019

TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M. To: Council Members AGENDA ITEM 8B5

2.0 PURPOSE AND NEED. 2.1 Purpose. 2.2 Need Traffic Congestion in and around Downtown Derry

PROJECT BACKGROUND. Preliminary Design Scope and Tasks

10 Implementation. Implementation. Responsibility for Implementation. Blueprint for Bloomsburg. Town of Bloomsburg Comprehensive Plan 10-1

COMMISSION ACTION FORM

TABLE OF CONTENTS HISTORIC PRESERVATION ELEMENT I. INTRODUCTION HP. A. Purpose HP B. Assessment and Conclusions...

CHAPTER 12 IMPLEMENTATION

Illustration of Eastlake Farmer s Cooperative Grain Elevator. Chapter 5: implementation 5-1

KNOXVILLE/KNOX COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING COMMISSION SUBDIVISION REPORT - CONCEPT/USE ON REVIEW

NORTH-SOUTH CORRIDOR STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Executive Summary

Commissioners Road West Realignment Environmental Assessment

SUBJECT: PREDEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW OF PROJECT LOCATED AT 2632 EAST WASHINGTON BOULEVARD ('ST. LUKE MEDICAL CENTER')

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS

DOWNTOWN WATERFRONT MASTER PLAN

INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT

Access Management: An Overview

Street Flooding Mitigation Plan KYOVA Interstate Planning Commission. Presented to AMPO National Conference October 18, 2017

GILLESPIE COUNTY RELIEF ROUTE PRELIMINARY REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Creating Complete Roadway Corridors:

ROAD CONSTRUCTION. 36 June 2014 ROADS&BRIDGES

ROGUE VALLEY SEWER SERVICES STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (SWMP)

Highway 15 Project - Hutchinson

Access Management and Site Plan Review. Robert W. Hofrichter Asst Administrator, Transportation and Mobility Planning Division April 2014

CHAPTER BEAUTIFICATION AND LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Intergovermental Coordination

Pennsylvania Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual. Chapter 1. Introduction and Purpose

Complete Streets Master Plan for Downtown New Britain CRCOG Transportation Committee Meeting Monday, December 9, 2013

GENERAL INFORMATIONaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

Transcription:

Iowa s Statewide Urban Design Standards Promote Improved Access Management David J. Plazak and Dale S. Harrington Center for Transportation Research and Education Iowa State University 2901 South Loop Drive, Suite 3100 Ames, IA 50010-8634 dplazak@iastate.edu, pcconc@iastate.edu ABSTRACT In the late 1980s, the majority of local units of government and the water works in central Iowa formed a committee to develop a common set of design standards and specifications for public works infrastructure to be used throughout the metro area This common set of standards included standard drawings and specifications for such things as storm sewers, sanitary sewers, and urban streets. The City of Des Moines and a local engineering and planning consulting firm, Snyder and Associates, coordinated the project and developed the manual with guidance from an advisory committee comprised of engineers from the member cities. The common set of standards helped the member cities realize lower bids from contractors, who were now able to design and build to the same standards no matter what community they were working for. In the late 1990s, a complete update of the Urban Design Standards Manual was undertaken. At that time, the 34 central Iowa member cities decided to dedicate an entire chapter of the manual to access management standards for urban streets. This decision was reached partly as a result of the findings of research and technology transfer work conducted by the Center for Transportation Research and Education (CTRE) at Iowa State University and sponsored by the Iowa Department of Transportation; the research indicated how valuable managing access could be in terms of improving the safety of major urban streets in Iowa. The new access management chapter in the Urban Design Standards Manual included material regarding general access management concepts and definitions, access permitting, entrance types, conflict points, driveway spacing, driveway design guidelines, turning lane and two-way left-turn lane guidelines, internal circulation design guidelines for commercial developments, and a section on access management and pedestrian and bicycle safety. A second chapter on traffic impact studies also includes material related to access management. Major sources of information for the new chapter were the Iowa State University/CTRE materials, the Iowa Department of Transportation access management standards for state primary highways, and the National Highway Institute access management course notebook. Iowa is now taking the Urban Design Standards Manual statewide. Iowa will be the first state to have a set of statewide urban design specifications. A committee has been established and an expanded intergovernmental agreement has been drafted to allow additional cities and metropolitan areas to adopt the standards. CTRE has taken on the role of coordinating and keeping the standards manual updated. As new communities and metro areas come on board via the intergovernmental agreement, cities in Iowa will effectively adopt a uniform set of access management guidelines for its city street system. Key words: access management urban design standards Proceedings of the 2003 Mid-Continent Transportation Research Symposium, Ames, Iowa, August 2003. 2003 by Iowa State University. The contents of this paper reflect the views of the author(s), who are responsible for the facts and accuracy of the information presented herein.

INTRODUCTION For almost 25 years, municipalities in Iowa have been working together on a set of shared urban design standards and specifications for public works infrastructure. This effort was designed to lower letting costs in the largest metropolitan area in Iowa for such items as arterial street construction. In 1995, a Governor s Blue Ribbon Task Force report recommended that this concept be expanded to a statewide set of urban design specifications as a cost-saving measure. From 1998 through 2000, this idea gradually became a reality and the Iowa Statewide Urban Design and Specifications (SUDAS) project took shape. SUDAS has ultimately become an ideal vehicle for the promotion of best practices in urban street design, such as the incorporation of the principles of access management. Lessons learned by the Iowa Department of Transportation (Iowa DOT) and local jurisdictions through years of access management planning, research, and project experience are being incorporated into the SUDAS manuals. The benefits of this approach are now being realized in terms of lower cost urban street projects that are engineered better and which recognize the careful balance that has to be maintained between serving through traffic and providing direct access to land development. SUDAS BACKGROUND AND HISTORY Starting in 1988, the City of Des Moines and neighboring jurisdictions developed a Central Iowa Urban Design Specification administered through Iowa Code 28E intergovernmental agreements. By 1999, the Central Committee Standards had grown to 35 units of government with nearly a half a million residents. The initial Central Iowa program evolved to provide a foundation for the SUDAS documents. In 1995 the Iowa Governor charged a Blue Ribbon Task Force with finding better methods to maximize the benefits derived from the Iowa Road Use Tax Fund (RUTF). The task force recommended that Iowa adopt common standards for construction specifications and construction equipment to increase project bidding and lower costs (1). In 1998, a statewide steering committee was formed that included representatives from the Iowa chapter of the American Public Works Association, Iowa County Engineers Association, Consulting Engineers Council of Iowa, and the Iowa DOT, as well as contractors and other stakeholders throughout the state. The steering committee completed a feasibility report in 1999 that recommended the Center for Transportation Research and Education (CTRE) develop and staff a program to adapt the Central Iowa Specifications to Statewide Urban Design and Specification documents. In 2000, the Iowa DOT provided a grant that allowed CTRE to begin work. Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) and Regional Planning Affiliations (RPAs, which are the transportation planning organizations for parts of Iowa outside metropolitan areas) provided matching funds of 60 percent to the Iowa DOT grant. The City of Des Moines contributed much of the preliminary legal work necessary to create the organizational structure and licensing agreement. The Iowa DOT also supplied additional legal assistance and ongoing technical help through its Office of Design. The Central Iowa Committee granted CTRE license to use and update the documents for the entire state; copyright will eventually be handed over to CTRE and its parent, Iowa State University. District committees were formed for each of the six Iowa DOT Districts to review existing manuals and recommend changes to bring them up to the state of the practice. Before adoption, all standards and specifications are subject to approval by a majority vote of the Statewide Steering Committee. Plazak and Harrington 2

During 2000 and 2001, CTRE staff visited the 23 metropolitan planning organizations and regional planning affiliations in the state at least twice explaining the program and obtaining funding resolutions. During 2002, 49 meetings were held with these groups to exchange ideas and solutions, and consider recommended amendments. To make SUDAS possible, over 200 city, county, and Iowa DOT engineers, plus other state, federal, and industry representatives contributed untold hours of expertise in an environment of collaboration and compromise. In early 2003, the first edition of the finalized amendments to the Iowa Statewide Urban Standard Specifications and Statewide Urban Design Standards Manuals were issued (2). ACCESS MANAGEMENT AND SUDAS Access management has quickly become a significant component of the Statewide Urban Design Standards. Access management is a process that manages access to land development while seeking to preserve the flow of traffic on the surrounding road system. Sound access management practices can lead to safer roads that also provide better service to motorists. In 1996, the Iowa DOT established an Access Management Task Force as part of its umbrella Iowa Safety Management System (Iowa SMS) development effort (3). The task force worked with CTRE at Iowa State University and other researchers at the University of Northern Iowa to improve awareness of how access management could lead to safer and better functioning highways, roads, and streets in Iowa. The task force and research team also investigated the effects that access management projects have on local business vitality. The results of this research were very supportive of an expanded access management program in Iowa (4) For instance, the research showed that case study roadways had crash rates that were 40 percent less on average following access management projects. At the same time, the vast majority of businesses were found to be unaffected by access changes. In order to encourage wider adoption of access management principles in Iowa by state, city, and county roadway officials, the task force commissioned a variety of outreach tools, including the following: a website presentations at numerous conferences in and near Iowa a statewide conference, a videotape, a set of brochures a guidebook a set of answers to frequently asked questions about access management for use in public and stakeholder involvement situations In combination, these efforts greatly increased awareness of access management and the benefits and impacts of incorporation of access management treatments. Many of these documents are available electronically on the websites listed in the references for this paper. As SUDAS was developed, the SUDAS Steering Committee and the consulting firm then managing the development and update of the Statewide Urban Design Standards Manual identified the need for a section or an entire chapter on access management. This effort was closely coordinated with the Access Management Task Force s outreach materials so that a consistent message would result. For example, the Manual borrowed a considerable amount of material from the Iowa Access Management Handbook (5). Several national sources were also used the development of the access management chapter. In particular, the National Highway Institute (NHI) training course notebook on access management and materials from Plazak and Harrington 3

leading states such as Florida, Colorado, New Jersey, and Oregon were used to add content to the SUDAS chapter on access management (6). The current version of the Statewide Urban Design Standards Manual contains a chapter on traffic impact studies and site impact analysis that complements the 44-page access management section. The SUDAS access management materials are better termed guidelines or suggestions rather than outright standards. The access management chapter in the Statewide Urban Design Standards Manual includes extensive material regarding the following: general access management concepts and definitions access permitting processes in Iowa driveway entrance types conflict points and their importance to traffic safety driveway spacing and corner clearance driveway geometrics and design guidelines turning lane and two-way left-turn lane guidelines internal circulation design guidelines for commercial developments access management impacts on pedestrian and bicycle safety This material can be obtained as a hard copy, on a CD-ROM, or be downloaded from the World Wide Web (http://www.iowasudas.org/). The web-based version is free; the paper and CD-ROM versions are made available at a modest cost. The appendix to this paper shows examples of diagrams and tabular material from the Statewide Urban Design Standards Manual related to access management. There have turned out to be several major benefits of having the access management material present in the SUDAS documents. These are that: Access management principles are available in one place for hundreds of local governments in Iowa plus their engineering consultants. When projects are being designed with SUDAS, they are more likely to incorporate sound access management principles since local governments and design consultants throughout Iowa will be using the standards as a guide. This improves the functionality and safety of designs. Access management principles are now considered early in the design process since SUDAS is the standard reference that engineering and planning firms and local governments will consult first. The access management materials in SUDAS are available for city engineering staff to use in educating stakeholders such as city council members and for city planning staff to use in educating planning and zoning commissioners about the benefits and importance of access management since a variety of material has been included that answers the questions that commonly arise when designs and access-related features are being considered. The access management materials in SUDAS are adaptable for use in stakeholder education and involvement. SUDAS provides more depth on design issues than other public involvement materials for access management that are used in Iowa. Although no formal studies of usage have been conducted, there is ample anecdotal evidence to show that the SUDAS access management materials are well used in Iowa. The SUDAS staff indicates that a number of suggestions to improve and expand on the access management chapter have been received. Plazak and Harrington 4

There have also been complaints to the effect that the access management guidelines are too lenient or unreasonably tough. Desirable corner clearance distance has been a particularly well-discussed area of the guidelines. FUTURE DIRECTIONS FOR SUDAS SUDAS is about to undergo a major change. The contents are being reviewed and completely updated so that they may be used statewide in Iowa rather than just in the Des Moines metropolitan area. Completion of the SUDAS documents update for statewide use is expected during 2004 with regular annual updates starting shortly thereafter. Fifty meetings are scheduled around the state during 2004 to develop amendments. Until the statewide manual updates are finalized and the copyright is transferred to Iowa State University/CTRE, local jurisdictions can use the existing central Iowa design and specification manuals distributed by CTRE, with the addenda of changes. These common standards and specifications are expected to develop design, construction, and contracting uniformity among communities. By reducing bias toward particular materials or methods and encouraging additional bids, the annual statewide savings for Iowa in Iowa RUTF dollars is estimated at nearly $9 million. Equally important, the statewide standards will provide a central means of transfer for emerging technologies and tested processes. CTRE will keep the manuals up to date, relieving individual communities of that burden and keeping cities informed about new procedures. For instance, content revision represents an opportunity to incorporate new knowledge about access management. For instance, the newly released National Access Management Handbook will be available to help improve the access management chapter in SUDAS. In addition, comments that have been received by users of the initial version will be considered prior to modifications being issued. A particularly challenging issue being addressed as this paper is written is the accommodation of Americans with Disabilities Act sidewalk and crossing design provisions in the access management section of SUDAS. CONCLUSION When the SUDAS updates are completed in 2004, Iowa will be one of only a few states with border-toborder uniform urban design and specification standards. Several other states are closely monitoring Iowa's process, products, and results. The SUDAS process represents an excellent opportunity for the transportation design community to jointly promote and adopt important concepts such as access management. Plazak and Harrington 5

APPENDIX: EXAMPLE FIGURES AND TABLES FROM THE IOWA STATEWIDE URBAN DESIGN AND SPECIFICATIONS MANUAL (CHAPTER 5, SECTION 5, ACCESS MANAGEMENT) (7) FIGURE 1. Graphic Explaining Conflict Point Terminology FIGURE 2. Graphic Explaining Driveway Corner Clearance Plazak and Harrington 6

FIGURE 3. Graphic Explaining Commercial Driveway Grade Guidelines FIGURE 4. Graphic Explaining Internal Circulation and Adequate Driveway Throat Length Plazak and Harrington 7

TABLE 1. Safety Impacts of Excessive Direct Access Access Points per Mile Undivided (Painted Centerline) Crash Rate (per MVMT) TWLTL Crash Rate (per MVMT) Raised Median Crash Rate (per MVMT) Rate Reduction Raised Median vs. TWLTL Less than 20 3.8 3.4 2.9 0.5 20 to 40 7.3 5.9 5.1 0.8 40 to 60 9.4 7.4 6.5 0.9 Over 60 10.6 9.2 8.2 1.0 Note: MVMT = million vehicle miles traveled; TWLTL = two-way left-turn lane. Source: National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report. TABLE 2. Relationships between Access Management Treatments and Pedestrian Safety Roadway Type Median Mid-block Pedestrian Crash Rate Intersection Pedestrian Crash Rate Undivided four lane None 6.69 2.32 Five lane (TWLTL) Painted 6.66 2.49 Divided four lane Raised 3.86 0.97 Note: TWLTL = two-way left-turn lane. Source: Oregon State University, 1998. REFERENCES 1. Governor s Blue Ribbon Transportation Task Force. Recommendations for Maximizing the Efficient Use of Iowa s Road Use Tax Fund. Governor s Blue Ribbon Transportation Task Force, Des Moines, Iowa, December 1995, pp. 29 30. 2. Iowa Statewide Urban Design and Specifications (SUDAS). Iowa Statewide Urban Standard Specifications and Statewide Urban Design Manuals. 2003. http://www.iowasudas.org/. 3. Iowa Safety Management System. http://www.iowasms.org/. 4. Maze, Tom, and David Plazak. Access Management Awareness Program: Phase II Summary Report. Center for Transportation Research and Education, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, December 1997. 5. Center for Transportation Research and Education. Iowa Access Management Handbook. http://www.ctre.iastate.edu/research/access/index.htm. 6. National Highway Institute. Access Management Location and Design. NHI Course Notebook Number 133078A. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. 7. Iowa Statewide Urban Design and Specifications (SUDAS). Chapter 5, Section 5, Access Management. Iowa Statewide Urban Design Manuals. http://www.iowasudas.org/design.cfm. Plazak and Harrington 8