LEGAL NOTICE. City of Tacoma Determination of Environmental Nonsignificance. Fred Wagner, Wagner Development. Demolition of Manitou school buildings

Similar documents
ALL SECURE SELF STORAGE SEPA APPEAL RECOMMENDATION TO THE HEARING EXAMINER

SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

DECISION CRITICAL AREAS ALTERATION AND DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS)

PURPOSE: The purpose is to provide commercial facilities in the Vancouver and Clark County vicinity.

Chapter LANDMARKS AND HISTORIC SPECIAL REVIEW DISTRICTS A.120 Enforcement A.130 Severability. Tacoma Municipal Code

City of Concord, NH Site Plan Regulations

Kitsap County Department of Community Development. Administrative Staff Report

BEFORE THE HEARINGS EXAMINER FOR THURSTON COUNTY

COUNTY COUNCIL OF PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND SITTING AS THE DISTRICT COUNCIL 2010 Legislative Session. Council Members Dernoga and Olson

AWH REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & PLANNING APPROVAL STAFF REPORT Date: April 4, 2013

TOWNSHIP OF LOGAN SOIL & FILL IMPORTATION AND PLACEMENT APPLICATION SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST

Shoreline Master Program Town of La Conner, Washington

STAFF REPORT FOR STANDARD COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT #CDP FEBRUARY 26, 2015 CPA - 1 PO BOX 238 APTOS, CA 94001

Staff will be providing an overview of the project need, purpose and intent for consideration as part of the Amendment cycle.

FIRCREST PLANNING/BUILDING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT CASE # Preliminary Major Site Plan

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA CHECKLIST OPEN SPACE CLASSIFICATION

4.1 LAND USE AND HOUSING

Neo-Traditional Overlay Application

DRAFT MAP AMENDMENT FLU 04-4

CHAPTER SPECIAL PURPOSE AND OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS

Gadsden County Planning Commission Agenda Request

BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THURSTON COUNTY

Pennsylvania Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual. Chapter 1. Introduction and Purpose

City of Leavenworth Department of Development Services

Appendix E Section 4(f) Evaluation

LU Encourage schools, institutions, and other community facilities that serve rural residents to locate in neighboring cities and towns.

2018 AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

City of Westbrook. 2 York Street Westbrook, Maine (207) Fax:

Legislation Passed August 8, 2017

Development Reviews. An overview of the Commission s review process, primarily in Klickitat County. March 13, 2018

GENERAL INFORMATIONaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

City of Tacoma Planning and Development Services

Attachment 4. TRPA Environmental Documentation, IEC/MFONSE

PLANNING COMMISSION S DRAFT FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, & RECOMMENDATION: State Route 20 (SR-20) / Sharpe s Corner Vicinity Improvements

SPECIFIC PLAN Requirements

ORDINANCE NO. 430 REGARDING WATER CONSERVATION

LOS ANGELES AIRPORT/EL SEGUNDO DUNES Specific Plan

CONSERVATION ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

SUBDIVISION, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, PLANNING APPROVAL, REZONING & SIDEWALK WAIVER STAFF REPORT Date: February 7, 2013

Chapter WAC SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM GUIDELINES. Table of Contents WAC AUTHORITY, PURPOSE AND EFFECTS OF GUIDELINES.

City of Fort Lupton Administrative Site Plan Process

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: May 18, 2017

CITY OF ST. AUGUSTA STEARNS COUNTY MINNESOTA ORDIANCE NO AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS FOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

CITY OF CYPRESS 5275 Orange Avenue Cypress, California (714) DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PERMIT PROCESS

Chapter 1: General Program Information

SEMSWA s Role in the Land Development Process

Kitsap County Department of Community Development. Hearing Examiner Staff Report and Recommendation

Planning Commission Report

Note: Staff reports can be accessed at Zone: I-3. Tier:

City of Tacoma Planning and Development Services

CITY OF MEDINA OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER

The following exhibits were submitted and made a part of the record as follows:

TO: CITY COUNCIL DATE: MARCH 23,2009

Venice Pumping Plant Dual Force Main Project Draft EIR

Pittsburgh District Pittsburgh, PA Notice No Closing Date: May 29, 2015

CITY OF MORRO BAY PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT 955 SHASTA AVENUE. MORRO BAY, CA

Staff Report & Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Amendments to the Pierce County Comprehensive Plan

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the City of Kalama has many areas of timberland and open areas inside its City limits adjacent to residential areas;

BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THE CITY OF PORT ORCHARD

APPLICATION SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST LAND USE PERMITS

ORDINANCE NO

3.10 LAND USE SETTING PROJECT SITE EXISTING LAND USE DESIGNATIONS AND ZONING. General Plan Land Use Designations.

City of Richland Comprehensive Plan: Integrated Non-project Final Environmental Impact Statement

GUIDELINES FOR CULTURAL HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENTS

ORDINANCE NO. City of Bellingham City Attorney 210 Lottie Street Bellingham, Washington INFILL HOUSING ORDINANCE Page 1

Intergovermental Coordination

PSRC REVIEW REPORT & CERTIFICATION RECOMMENDATION

7 May 9, 2012 Public Hearing APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER: COASTAL ENTERPRISES, LLC

12 January 12, 2011 Public Hearing APPLICANT: TAILWIND DEVELOPMENT GROUP,LLC PROPERTY OWNER: CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH

SAN FRANCISCO. x ~ OT`s 0~5` PLANNING DEPARTMENT. Certificate of Determination COMMUNITY PLAN EVALUATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION CEQA DETERMNATION

Snohomish County Planning and Development Services

City of Tacoma Planning and Development Services

MEMORANDUM AGENDA ITEM #IV.C

TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M. February 19, 2010 Regional Planning Council Meeting

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT Date: June 2, 2016

S 2024 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (MASTER PLAN & UNIT PLAN)

Welcome! Agenda. South Downtown

CIVIL ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION

HAZARD MITIGATION GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

A Guide to Open Space Design Development in Halifax Regional Municipality

Public facilities have also been added as a permitted use in the CB Zone as discussed during the first reading of the ordinance.

WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON

Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District Stormwater Management Plan Review Policy

Chesapeake Bay Critical Area Conservation Plan

Washington State Growth Management Act: The Basics. Kitsap County Department of Community Development

Riparian Buffer on the Bushkill Creek. Policies

How To Get the Development You Planned

LITTLE ITALY UNIVERSITY CIRCLE (MAYFIELD STATION) COMMUNITY MEETING FEBRUARY 21, 2013

CLACKAMAS COUNTY ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE

City of Tacoma Planning Commission

Town of Windham. Planning Department 8 School Road Windham, ME voice fax

Chapter 4 - Preparation of Stormwater Site Plans

SECTION 1 Introduction...1. SECTION 2 Regional Context Criteria for Planning Districts Description of Planning District...

LAND USE ELEMENT. Purpose. General Goals & Policies

CITY OF FORT COLLINS TYPE 1 ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING FINDINGS AND DECISION. Elevations Credit Union (2025 S. College Avenue)

A. FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT

E O L A F I V E. Location Map SUMMARY G M P Z O N I T E M S # 1 A. & B.

CITY OF PUYALLUP. Background. Development Services

Transcription:

LEGAL NOTICE City of Tacoma Determination of Environmental Nonsignificance Lead Agency: Applicant: Proposal: Location: City of Tacoma Fred Wagner, Wagner Development Demolition of Manitou school buildings 4806 South 66 th Street SEPA Public Information Center File No. LU16-0110 The lead agency for this proposal has made a preliminary determination that this project does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(9c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. Comments on this determination of environmental nonsignificance must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on July 5, 2016. The City will reconsider this determination based on timely comments and may retain, modify, or if significant adverse impacts are likely, withdraw the determination. Unless modified by the City, this determination will become a final determination on July 6, 2016. There is no administrative appeal opportunity for this Determination. Appeals may be filed at the Superior Court of the State of Washington for Pierce County within 21 days after the building permit is issued. Appeals to the Superior Court shall be taken in accordance with procedures and limitations set forth in RCW 43.21C.075. A copy of the appeal shall be filed with the Planning and Development Services Department, 747 Market Street, Tacoma, Washington 98402. The City of Tacoma does not discriminate on the basis of disability in any of its programs or services. Upon request, special accommodations will be provided within five (5) business days by contacting 591-5363 (VOICE) or 591-5070 (TTY). Issue/Publication Date: June 21, 2016 The Tacoma Daily Index

City of Tacoma Planning and Development Services Determination of Environmental Nonsignificance (DNS) SEPA File Number: LU16-0110 Related File Number: DEMOC16-0016 To: Subject: All Departments and Agencies with Jurisdiction Determination of Environmental Nonsignificance In accordance with Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 197-11-340, a copy of the Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) for the project described below is transmitted. Applicant: Proposal: Fred Wagner, Wagner Development 4225 South Orchard St, Tacoma WA 98466 Demolition of approximately 50,000 square feet of school buildings on an approximate 2.4-acre site. Location: 4806 South 66 th Street, parcel number 5460001580. Lead Agency: City Contact: City of Tacoma Shirley Schultz Principal Planner Planning and Development Services 747 Market Street, Room 345 Tacoma, WA 98402 253-591-5121 shirley.schultz@cityoftacoma.org The Responsible Official for the City of Tacoma hereby makes the following findings and conclusions based upon a review of the environmental checklist and attachments, other information on file with the City of Tacoma, and the policies, plans, and regulations designated by the City of Tacoma as a basis for the exercise of substantive authority under the Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) pursuant to RCW 43.21C. 747 Market Street, Room 345 Tacoma, Washington 98402 (253) 591-5577 http://www.tacomapermits.org

Findings of Fact: General: 1. The applicant proposes to demolish two school buildings totaling approximately 50,000 square feet of area, along with select demolition of site improvements. The school buildings are currently used as a community center. The site is zoned R-2 One-Family Dwelling District; future plans are to redevelop the property with single-family residences. Earth: An environmental review is required for the proposal in accordance with the SEPA, RCW 43.21C, Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 197-11, and Tacoma Municipal Code (TMC) 13.12 Environmental Code. The 12,000 square foot threshold for a commercial or institutional building is being exceeded (WAC 197-11-800(1)(c)); hence the proposed demolition requires a SEPA determination. 2. The project proposes to comply with all regulations including the International Building Code (IBC) Appendix J (Grading) as adopted and amended by the City of Tacoma, as well as TMC Chapter 13.06 Zoning and Chapter 13.11 Critical Areas Ordinance. No grading is proposed as part of the demolition, and erosion control will be placed as necessary. 3. Soil contamination issues associated with the Asarco Plume are addressed in the Environmental Health subsection of this document. Air: 4. Watering of exposed soil and building materials during demolition to suppress dust will ensure that no impacts to ambient air quality will result from the project. Water: 5. The project will meet all requirements of the current and any future revisions to the Stormwater Management Manual, the Critical Areas Ordinance and other City regulatory requirements related to stormwater. 6. No regulated wetlands, streams, or associated buffers have been identified on the project site pursuant to TMC 13.11 Critical Areas Ordinance. 7. The site is not located within a flood hazard and/or coastal high hazard area as regulated by TMC 13.11.600, 13.11.610 and 13.11.620 and Sections 2.12.040 and 2.12.050. Plants: 8. The proposed project will meet TMC 13.06.502 Landscaping/Buffering Standards. Aesthetics: 9. The proposed project will not include any new development. Any future development at the site will meet TMC 13.06.501 Building Design Standards, TMC 13.06.502 Landscaping/Buffering Standards, and TMC 13.06.503 Residential Compatibility Standards. Animals: 10. No state or federal candidate, threatened or endangered plant or animal species, or habitat has been identified on the project site. Energy and Natural Resources: 11. The proposed project will comply with the City s Energy Code. LU16-0110 Manitou Building Demolition Page 2 of 5

Environmental Health: 12. According to the Department of Ecology (Ecology) Facility/Site Atlas, the site is located within the Tacoma Smelter Plume with an arsenic concentration range of Non-Detect to 20.0 ppm. Due to the facility atlas indicating that arsenic concentration is below the Model Toxics Control Act standards, no further review of the site relative to Asarco contamination is required at this time. 13. All requirements of the Tacoma-Pierce County Health Department (TPCHD) and Ecology will be met. Noise: 14. All WAC noise levels shall be met. 15. Activities at the site shall comply with all applicable provisions of TMC 8.122 Noise Enforcement. Land Use: 16. The project is a permitted use within the R-2 One-Family Dwelling District and will not require a discretionary land use permit. No redevelopment is proposed pursuant to this environmental review. 17. The Comprehensive Plan designation for the site is Single Family Residential. Housing: 18. The demolition project will provide no units of housing. No adverse impacts to housing will result from the proposal. Recreation: 19. The project will not be developed on property designated as open space or public recreation area. No adverse impacts to recreation will result from the proposal. Historical and cultural preservation: 20. The project is not located within or adjacent to any property listed on the Tacoma, Washington State or National Registers of Historic Places, and is not within proximity to any known archaeological site or archaeological site that is inventoried by the State of Washington Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation. However, the property is the site of Manitou Elementary School, originally constructed in 1919 and altered/added to in 1958. Review by the City s Historic Preservation Officer shows the property has been determined Not Eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places by the Washington Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (DAHP). Photographs of existing structure have been provided to DAHP. No further review is needed. Transportation: 21. The project will comply with TMC 13.06.510 Off-street parking and storage areas. 22. The Public Works Engineering Division indicates that the traffic volumes generated by the proposal will not result in significant adverse impacts to the City s street system. Public Services/Public Utilities: 23. Project concurrency certification or an appropriate mitigation will be completed at the building permit review stage. LU16-0110 Manitou Building Demolition Page 3 of 5

NOTE: The issuance of this SEPA Determination does not constitute final project approval. The applicant must comply with all other applicable requirements of the City of Tacoma Departments and other agencies with jurisdiction prior to receiving construction permits. cc: Applicant South Tacoma Neighborhood Council, Chairperson Washington Department of Ecology, sepaunit@ecy.wa.gov Tacoma-Pierce County Health Department, SEPA, SEPA@tpchd.org Washington State Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation, Gretchen Kaehler, gretchen.kaehler@dahp.wa.gov Pierce Transit - Bus Stop Program, Tina Vaslet, tvaslet@piercetransit.org Pierce County Assessor Treasurer, Darci Brandvold, dbrandv@co.pierce.wa.us Planning and Development Services, Reuben McKnight, Peter Huffman, Ian Munce Community and Economic Development, Carol Wolfe LU16-0110 Manitou Building Demolition Page 5 of 5