Industrial Explosion Suppression Technology

Similar documents
A Global Leader in Explosion Protection

Dust Explosions. health & environmental sciences failure analysis & prevention

Before proceeding with the selection process, let s briefly look at the various explosion protection options:

Understanding. Combustible Dust Hazards: Basic Measures to Ensure the Safety of Combustible Dust Handling Operations

Combustible Dust Issues

With CV Technology products and care, you ll be better protected from dust explosions.

There are always options in the management of explosion risks!

GEAPS Great Lakes Regional Conference 2017 Explosion Protection Overview & Market Drivers. April 6, 2017

The element is closed at one end and open at the other, and it s bolted onto the explosion vent opening on the equipment so that its open end overlaps

Guide - Basic Information

Protecting Critical Facilities Against Explosions

Industrial Dust Explosions Causes & Case Studies. Presented by Geof Brazier at Expocorma, Concepcion, Chile 10th November 2017

Protecting Facilities Against Explosions. Since 1956

Leading Trends in Chemical Processing

Combustible Dust 101: Understanding Combustible Dust Hazards

Jason Reason. NFPA Technical Committees

Combustible Dust Hazards- Awareness

Combustible Dust Awareness. David McEwan Business Line Manager Configured Products

Property risk solutions

Managing Combustible Dust

EXPLOSION PROTECTION MAES SAFETY PRODUCTS & SERVICES

Explosion Prevention & Suppression James Maness JEM Safety Consulting Rehoboth, DE.

Objectives. NFPA Dust Specific Documents. Combustible Dust Process Hazard Safety Overview of NFPA Standards for Combustible Dusts

Conducting a NFPA 652 Dust Hazard Analysis (DHA): Practical Tips & Approaches

Combustible Dust with FR Clothing June Service Experience Trust Quality Flexibility

Combustible Dust Hazard Recognition and Control NFPA Standards for Combustible Dusts

Progressive Safety Services LLC 1

Prevention of Fires and Explosions in Wood Pellet Facilities. Allen Wagoner, FLAMEX, Inc.

Flameless Venting The New Technology for Safe Indoor Explosion Venting

APPLICATION PROFILE EXPLOSIONS IN CEMENT PLANTS EXPLOSIONS IN CEMENT PLANTS CEMENT PLANT EQUIPMENT WITH HIGHEST EXPLOSION POTENTIAL. Form No.

Implementing a Combustible Dust Program. Presented by: Nick Miedema Amway EH&S For: Michigan Safety Conference

Dust Explosion Hazard Overview

OUTDOOR INSTALL NO RETURN AIR SINGLE MODULE COLLECTORS OUTDOOR INSTALL WITH RETURN AIR SINGLE MODULE COLLECTORS

PRIMATECH WHITE PAPER PROCEDURE FOR DUST HAZARD ANALYSIS (DHA)

WHITE PAPER Dust Hazard Analysis for Simple Dust Collection Systems

Dust Explosions. by Clive de Salis. Telephone: +44 (0)

Safe installations are also cost effective installations

COMBUSTIBLE DUST SAFETY PROGRAM

COMBUSTIBLE DUST HAZARD MITIGATION

3/20/2017. The Impact & Implications of NFPA 652 NFPA s Newest Combustible Dust Standard. Jason Reason. Jason Reason

Explosion Protection. Process Safety. Quality Solutions.

Aluminum Dust Management in a Metallizing Facility

EXPLOSION PROTECTION INTEGRATED COMPONENTS EXPLOSION PROTECTION SOLUTIONS EXPLOSION PROTECTION INNOVATIVE, RELIABLE, PATENTED TECHNOLOGIES

Combustible Dust Booklet

General Design Practices in Reducing Risk in Grain Handling Facilities

Prevention of Fires and Dust Explosions within the Biomass Handling Process. PFI July 20, 2015

The correlating committee has revised the numbering in these sections to provide clarity for the next edition of the document.

THE PACESETTER IN EXPLOSION SAFETY INNOVATION EXPLOSION PROTECTION SOLUTIONS YOU CAN COUNT ON WORLDWIDE.

Dust Hazard Assessments

Managing explosive dust risk in sugar handling

NFPA Overview. International Titanium 2014 Conference Chicago Kevin L. Kreitman

Advances in Explosion Protection Technology. Dr. John E. Going Fike Corporation Blue Springs, MO

INTRODUCTION TO DUSTS AND THEIR EXPLOSIVE PROPERTIES

COMBUSTIBLE DUST HAZARD RECOGNITION

ADDITIONS TO NFPA 61, STANDARD FOR THE PREVENTION OF FIRES AND DUST EXPLOSIONS IN THE AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD PROCESSING INDUSTRIES

M E M O R A N D U M. NFPA Technical Committee on Wood and Cellulosic Materials Processing

AUTOMATIC FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS

Combustible Dust Resources OVERVIEW OF COMBUSTIBLE DUST. What is Combustible Dust? Where are Combustible Dusts found?

Industrial Explosion Protection. Every human being has the right to live in a safe environment, free of needless risks.

Another Means of Worksite Analysis NFPA 652 s Standard on Dust Hazard Analysis (DHA)

Hoeganaes Corporation Iron Dust Flash Fires and Hydrogen Explosion

OSHA - Enforcement Define the terminology Recognize a Dust Explosion hazard Learn hazard management methods

Q-Box-II LF- NFPA 654

Plant Issues in an NFPA 652 Dust Hazard Analysis

Page 1 of /11/2016 2:36 PM. First Revision No. 30-NFPA [ Global Input ] Submitter Information Verification. Committee Statement

How to a Use Process Hazard Analysis (PHA) to Reduce Combustible Dust Explosion Risk

National Fire Protection Association. 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA Phone: Fax:

DUST COLLECTION TRAINING. Revision 2013

Combustible Wood Dust Management Program Development Guide

Special Occupancy Requirements

1. Delete in its entirety as follows:

1NFPA 68 has changed from a guideline to a

GHS Dust Explosion Guidance. ANNEX 11 Guidance on other hazards not resulting in classification. September 2017

TECH UPDATE - Spark Detection, Dust Suppression, and Fire Suppression Equipment

Wood Pellet Mills: Dust suppression, spark detection, and extinguishing systems equipment

M E M O R A N D U M. The Technical Correlating Committee on Boiler and Combustion Systems Hazards

National Fire Protection Association. 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA Phone: Fax:

DEFLAGRATION FIRE MARSHAL PMAX WOOD

Kice Dust Control System Design and Maintenance Basics Design, Maintenance, & Operation

Explosion Venting and Suppression of Bucket Elevator Legs, G90-990

BUILDING/FIRE CODE REFERENCES 2006 EDITION

We ve all heard about catastrophic combustible

International Safety Guide Chapter 30 for Inland Navigation Tank-barges and Terminals. Chapter 30 FIRE-FIGHTING

Explosion prevention and explosion protection according to ATEX guidelines. Safe extraction and separation of explosive dust

COMBUSTIBLE DUST AN EXPLOSIVE ISSUE NFPA 654

4/6/2018. Merrill Childs Cargill Eddyville, IA Iowa-Illinois Safety Council Coralville, IA April 12, 2018

SEF Presents: Common Questions for a Chemical Safety Program. Wednesday September 20, 2017

2012 International Symposium on Safety Science and Technology Advances in dust explosion protection techniques: flameless venting

Dust Collection Tips to Keep Free-From Foods Safe from Cross-Contamination

Ammonia Refrigeration RAGAGEP

FlexFilter EX A state of the art filter system to meet your current and future needs

Ontario Fire Code SECTION 5.10 COMBUSTIBLE DUST PRODUCING PROCESSES. Illustrated Commentary. Office of the Ontario Fire Marshal

First Revision No. 15-NFPA [ Chapter 2 ]

Soot Mitigation Strategies

INSTALLATION, OPERATION, AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL XP DRUM KIT PATENT PENDING UTILITY 35 USC 111(A)

This Second Correlating Revision effects correct usage. This also addresses one of the Affirmative Comments to Second Revision No. 28.

Combustible Dust Explosions and Hazards Case Study: CTA Acoustics, Inc.

As long as ATEX has been providing Explosion. Protection Systems a truly passive System without many

CPL Combustible Dust National Emphasis Program (Reissued)

Transcription:

88 th Annual Michigan Safety Conference 2018 Tuesday April 17 th 2018-10:45 AM Industrial Division Lansing Center, Lansing, MI Industrial Explosion Suppression Technology Presenter: Rob Markle Phone: (309) 360-1080 Email: rob.markle@ieptechnologies.com

1 2 3 (Fundamentals) (OSHA, NFPA, AHJ) (Protection Methods)

Fundamentals of an Explosion

Combustion Materials Testing 20-Liter Test Vessel for Kst, Pmax Determination Go-No Go Test www.combustionresearchcenter.com

Explosibility Calculation (identifying risk) Pressure P max R max dp K st = R max V 1/3 [bar-m/s] Where R max = The maximum rate of pressure rise [bar/s] dt R max = (dp/dt) max V = The volume of the test vessel [m 3 ] Time

Hazard Classes of Dust Deflagrations relative explosibility hazard Hazard Class ST - 1 ST - 2 ST - 3 K st Value 1-200 201-300 301 and above Example Pittsburgh seam coal has a Kst of 129 bar-m/sec, making it an ST-1 dust

Deflagration Propagation Interconnected Equipment NFPA recognizes the need to isolate explosion hazards Pressure piling in duct Elevated pressures and ignition source

Secondary Explosions Dust Accumulation in plant leads to more severe explosion NFPA recognizes 1/32 accumulation over 5% surface area a severe hazard Initial explosion creates vibration and a plant wide dust cloud Flame ruptures from vessel and ignites secondary explosion

Secondary Explosions SECONDARY EXPLOSIONS ARE THE MAIN THREAT TO PERSONNEL AND PROPERTY! Plastics Mfg. in NC Polyethylene Powder 6 fatalities Hundreds of injuries Plant destroyed Was major employer Acoustic Board Mfg. Kentucky 7 fatalities 37 injured Use phenolic resin powder as binder for fiberglass mats Sugar Refinery Georgia 14 fatalities 38 injuries Milling and Packaging destroyed

Regulation NFPA Standards - Enforceable when incorporated into state, local law - Most have strengthened EP requirements due to NFPA 652 OSHA Responsible for enforcing workplace safety OSHA Combustible Dust Directive driving explosion mitigation OSHA Combustible Dust Standard now tabled

National Emphasis Program on Combustible Dusts http://www.osha.gov/oshdoc/directive_pdf/cpl_03-00-008.pdf General Duty Clause requiring safe and healthful workplace Issued 10-18-2007, Revised March 2008 Testing samples for combustibility Explosion mitigation requirements per NFPA 654 Deflagration isolation required per NFPA 654 Reviewing housekeeping (1/32 ) Emphasis on dust collection Citations and Fines

New NFPA 652 - Standard on the Fundamentals of Combustible Dust First released as a standard in 2016 Intended to simplify OSHA compliance and enforcement Will provide the basic principles of and requirements for identifying and managing the fire and explosion hazards of combustible dusts and particulate solids NFPA 652 committee members advise the other industry standards during cycle meetings

NFPA 652 2016 Edition Will co-exist with industry-specific standards NFPA 61 Agricultural and Food Facilities NFPA 654 Combustible Particulate Solids NFPA 664 Wood Processing/Woodworking NFPA 484 Combustible Metals Conflicts - The more stringent requirement between NFPA 652 and the industry-specific standard will apply

NFPA 652 2016 Edition

NFPA 652 2016 Edition Defines Responsibility 4.1 General. The owner/operator of a facility with potentially combustible dust shall be responsible for the following activities: 1. Determining the combustibility and explosibility hazards of materials in accordance with Chapter 5 2. Identifying and assessing any fire, flash fire, and explosion hazards in accordance with Chapter 7 (DHA) 3. Managing the identified fire, flash fire, and explosion hazards in accordance with 4.2.4 4. Communicating the hazards to affected personnel in accordance with Section 9.5

NFPA 652 2016 Edition Defines Responsibility Chapter 7 Dust Hazards Analysis (DHA) 7.1.1 Responsibility. The owner/operator of a facility where materials that have been determined to be combustible or explosible in accordance with Chapter 5 are present in an enclosure shall be responsible to ensure a DHA is completed in accordance with the requirements of this chapter. 7.1.2.2 For existing processes and facility compartments that are not undergoing material modification, the owner/operator shall schedule and complete DHAs of existing processes and facility compartments within a 3-year period from the effective date of the standard. The owner/operator shall demonstrate reasonable progress in each of the 3 years.

DHA for Process Equipment Identifying Risk

Explosion Prevention Measures Process Hazard Evaluation Ignition Control Bonding/Grounding Electrical Equipment/Classification Control of Friction, Impact Spark Potential Hot Work Procedures Housekeeping Hazard Training and Awareness Management of Change

Explosion Protection Methods Containment Inerting Deflagration Suppression Deflagration Relief Venting Deflagration Isolation

Deflagration Relief Venting Relieve internal pressure in vessel Prevent flame escalation from deflagration to detonation Must not become projectile

Deflagration Relief Vents Rupture-style flat or domed Square or rectangular Optional burst sensors Optional Insulated Models Shear pins Magnetic latched or spring-loaded doors Gravity panels

Venting Considerations Fireball 7x volume of vessel Flame ejection >50 Must vent to safe area Combustible must be safe to vent outside Potential for Explosion Propagation? Post Explosion Fires? Reaction Forces?

Explosion Vent Sizing NFPA 68 for Sizing INSIDE VESSELS: Vent ducts require additional vent area Vessel overpressure strength needed Will not stop flame propagation through inlet or exhaust

Flameless Explosion Vents Passive protection means Inside venting performed without ducts Temperatures cooled to approx. 90 0 C

Flameless Explosion Vents - Considerations Does not suppress deflagration, fire could remain in vessel. Fire protection must be considered Flame propagation issue still exists. Deflagration isolation must be considered Safe zone needed around unit (hot gases, toxicity)

Maintenance Requirements - Vents NFPA 68 11.4* Inspection. 11.4.1 Vent closures shall be inspected at least annually. 11.4.2* The frequency of the inspection described in 11.4.4 shall be permitted to be increased or decreased based on documented operating experience. 11.7.1 A record shall be maintained that indicates the date and the results of each inspection and the date and description of each maintenance activity. 11.7.2 The records of inspections shall be retained for a minimum of 3 years.

Explosion Suppression Pressure sensor located on dirty volume Dry Chemical agent discharges into vessel Fireball is extinguished and process is shut down Agent quantity based on dirty volume, Kst, Pmax Agent is discharged into interconnected ducts to prevent propagation

Suppression Sequence - Starch in 1 m 3 Vessel Extinguisher Detector Time 0 ms 20 ms 30 ms 40 ms 80 ms

Explosion Suppression Components Control Unit Explosion Pressure Detectors Explosion Suppression Extinguisher

Dynamic Pressure Detector Programmable Rate of Rise CIP Compatible Event Memory Flange installed by fab shop

Dynamic Pressure Detector History can show evidence of a successful suppression event FAB Module

IR Flame Detector Infrared Flame detector desensitized to look for flame only (not for spark detection) Used on ducts to shorten the required isolation distance for low Kst dust (~50) or lazy deflagrations

Explosion System Control Unit User interface for alarm and trouble conditions Key switch for arming/disarming Provisions for OSHA LOTO Relays to interface with process PLC for shutdown upon alarm

Dry Chemical Extinguisher Sizes: PF II-1000, 4 Kg PF II-2000, 10 Kg PF II-3000, 20 Kg - Actuates in milliseconds - Sodium-bicarbonate agent - Used for suppression and chemical explosion isolation

Suppression Discharge Nozzle Disperses suppressant Pipe cap for inspection of discharge nozzle per NFPA requirement End sealed with silicone cap, to prevent plugging in discharge pipe Spreader cap blows off during discharge

Maintenance Requirements - Systems NFPA 69-15.7 Inspection. 15.7.1 Systems shall be inspected and tested at 3-month intervals. 15.7.1.3* The frequency of inspection described in 15.7.1 shall be permitted to be increased or decreased based on documented operating experience or a documented hazard analysis, and only with approval of both the explosion prevention system designer and the AHJ. 15.7.1.4 Maximum inspection and test interval shall not exceed 2 years. 15.9.2 System inspection reports shall be kept or accessible at the site for at least 3 years.

Extinguisher - Lockout Plate Storage for plate Process Maintenance OSHA lockout plate provides a mechanical barrier for safer access inside vessel Agent cannot discharge through the nozzle to the inside of the vessel Protection system cannot be armed when OSHA plate is installed Normal operation

Explosion Propagation NFPA 652 NFPA 654 Active Explosion Isolation Passive Explosion Isolation

Chemical Isolation Barrier Activated by pressure (or flame detection for Kst<50) Location on duct is based on vessel volume, Kst, Pmax and detection time

Explosion Isolation Valve High speed valve closes in milliseconds. Rated for 150 psig deflagrations. Available 2 up to 24 sizes Requires detection and controller to activate

Passive Explosion Isolation Passive Explosion Isolation for Collector Inlet Ducts Lower Cost Alternative to High- Speed Valves or Chemical Isolation Sensors improve reliability, reduce inspection frequency Third-Party Performance-Based Approvals per NFPA requirements

Rotary Valves NFPA 69-12.2.4.2 Rotary Valve Design Criteria Rotary valves intended for deflagration isolation systems shall be designed according to one of the following isolation concepts: (1) Deflagration isolation by flame quenching (close-clearance valves) (2) Deflagration isolation by material blocking (product layer above the valve)

Passive Isolation Valve Clean air Considerations DN100 DN600 ~ 4 in 24 in sizes Suitability: light dust concentrations Dust collector exhaust ducts Mill air intake ducts Collectors with light dust loading

IEP Applications Dust Collectors, Receivers Cyclones, Classifiers Dryers (Spray, Fluid Bed, Flash) Bucket Elevators Mixers, Blenders Mills, Grinders, Pulverizers Bins, Hoppers, Silos Conveying ducts

Vented - Passive Isolation (inlet)

Vented - Passive Isolation (outlet)

Vented - Chemical Isolation (inlet)

Vented Inlet / Outlet Isolation

Suppressed - Inlet Isolation only

Suppressed - Outlet Isolation too

Thank You! Questions?