SOILS AND AGRICULTURAL POTENTIAL FOR THE PROPOSED P166 SERVITUDE, MBOMBELA, MPUMALANGA PROVINCE

Similar documents
SOIL SURVEY FOR PROPOSED WET ASH DISPOSAL FACILITY, HENDRINA POWER STATION, MPUMALANGA PROVINCE

SCOPING REPORT. On contract research for ILISO CONSULTING

SOIL SURVEY OF PORTIONS 81 AND 82 OFTHE FARM VAALBANK 512JQ, NEAR MAGALIESBURG, SOUTH-WEST OF PRETORIA

The entire site supports grass on which sheep had been grazing recently.

PHYSICAL CHAtlACTERISTICS REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED SAND AND GRAVEL SITE AT MANOR FARM, UFFINGTON

Report on a soil survey and agricultural suitability investigation of the property known as Erf 660, De Doorns.

Topoclimate Southland Soil Technical Data Sheet No Waiau

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION AND STATEMENT OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION AND SOIL PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS LAND NEAR SHIRE HILL FARM SAFFRON WALDEN ESSEX

Topoclimate Southland Soil Technical Data Sheet No. 8. Sobig

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION AND SOIL PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS BIRCH PIT, NEAR COLCHESTER ESSEX

SOIL SURVEY REPORT ON SENCE de LIEU, PAARL

Agricultural Land Classification and Statement of Physical Characteristics Higbfield Farm Whitley Bridge North Yorkshire October 1996

PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS REPORT INCORPORATING AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION LAND AT BOLE INGS, WESTBURTON, NOTTINGHAMSHIRE (SK805875)

6 Athlone Street Tel: SWELLENDAM Cell:

STATEMENT OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION

Topoclimate Southland Soil Technical Data Sheet No. 76. Mossburn

AGRICULTURAL USE & QUALITY OF LAND NEAR MINDALE HOUSE PRESTATYN. Report 762/1

Iowa FFA Soil Career Development Event 2008

Topoclimate Southland Soil Technical Data Sheet No. 23. Waikiwi

STATEMENT OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION WITTON PARK, COUNTY DURHAM PROPOSED QUARRY EXTENSION DECEMBER 1992

CB1 Moderately undulating landscape with slight gilgai (few inches) formation: broad ridge tops and upper slopes of moderately shallow grey cracking

Vetiver System for Xinchang Railway Embankment Stabilization The First Vetiver Application for Railway in China

Tools to facilitate the use of Soil Maps in Emilia-Romagna region (Italy) Paola Tarocco

Soil Horizons cont. Oa- highly decomposed Oi-undecomposed

2014 Iowa FFA Soil Judging CDE Exam

2016 Iowa FFA Soils Evaluation CDE Exam

SOILS AND AGRICULTURAL USE & QUALITY OF LAND OFF HOLT ROAD, ROSSETT. Report 1067/1

2012 FINAL SOILS AREA 2 Envirothon Questions Answer KEY

2018 Iowa FFA Soil Judging CDE Exam 1. Landscape positions characterizes the location of the soil on the landscape and identifies potential risks.

3.44b. Soil Classification AK & BR

Unit 1 Lesson 5 Soil Formation. Copyright Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company

Examining soils in the field. Examining soils in the field. Environment Agency thinksoils examining soils in the field

STAFFORDSHIRE AND STOKE-ON- TRENT STRUCTURE PLAN Site 7: Priory Farm. Agricultural Land Classification ALC Map and Report November 1998

Do Now: From which materials do you think soil is made? Are all soils the same? Think of some ways that they are different?

4.0 EROSION AND SEDIMENT PROCESS. 4.1 Mechanics of Erosion

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION

Annex 5D. Soil, Land Use and Land Capability Report compiled by TerraAfrica Consult, April 2015


Mature basalt volcanic soils

LAND NORTH OF TAMWORTH. Agricultural Land Classification ALC Map and Report April 1998

3. What are the five master horizons? Give distinguishing features of each. 5. List three means by which plant roots come into contact with nutrients.

HAVE YOU NOTICED at construction sites how a

Topoclimate Southland Soil Technical Data Sheet No. 11. Pukemutu

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION AND STATEMENT OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS

PROPOSED OPEN CAST COAL SITE SEPTEMBER 1992

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION AND STATEMENT OF SOIL PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS EXTENSION TO CLOUD HILL QUARRY, BREEDON ON THE HILL, LEICESTERSHIRE

5 RESULTS FOR THE REJECT EMPLACEMENT AREA

Pistachio Project Planning, Irrigation Systems and Irrigation Management. Trevor Sluggett Irrigation Agronomist AgriExchange Pty Ltd

HUMBLEBURN OCCS, CRAGHEAD, COUNTY DURHAM SURVEY OF RESTORED LAND OCTOBER RPT Job Number: 73/97 MAFF Reference: EL LURET Job Number: ME3RTP

2011 Wisconsin Envirothon Soils and Land Use Exam

ACRE NOOK EAST QUARRY, CHELFORD, CHESHIRE. Statement of Site Physical Characteristics January 1998

DO YOU KNOW YOUR SOILS? (Rev. 10/11)

PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS REPORT INCORPORATING AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION

Saline and Sodic Field Demonstration project

Environmental Impact Assessment for KPSX: Weltevreden


Investigation into soil texture in my area

Land Capability Classifications

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION REPORT LAND AT BRANT FARM, STOURPORT-ON-SEVERN

IOWA FFA STATE SOILS CDE SATURDAY, OCTOBER 13, 2007 AMES, IOWA

Soil resources in upper Basho Valley.

EXAMPLE Point A: Sandy Loam: 65% Sand _ 20% Silt _ 15% Clay. Point B: %Sand % Silt % Clay. Point C: %Sand % Silt % Clay. Point D: %Sand % Silt % Clay

Understanding Soil Variability to Utilize Variable Rate Fertilizer Technology

2017 Iowa FFA Soil Judging CDE Exam

2016 Area 3 Envirothon Muskingum County Soils Test ANSWER KEY

THE TENNESSEE VEGETABLE GARDEN

Bell Ringer. d) Erosion e) Decomposition of organic compounds

STATEMENT OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OLDWICK FARM, WEST LAVANT, WEST SUSSEX

Kenya Agricultural Research Institute Kenya Soil Survey P.O. Box Tel: /

Understanding Soils. 1. What is Soil? 2. What does soil do for us?

P/2014/00830 Received 27/06/2014 SOIL RESOURCES AND AGRICULTURAL USE & QUALITY OF LAND AT ROLLESTON PARK FARM TUTBURY, STAFFORDSHIRE.

HINCKLEY AND BOSWORTH LOCAL PLAN Land south of Earl Shilton - Site G Agricultural Land Classification February 1997

Also available on the web at

CAVIL HEAD OCCS ACKLINGTON NOVEMBER 1997

REPORT. Soil, Land Capability and Land Use Assessment Report for the Proposed New Vaal Colliery Life Extension Project.

Soil Properties That Distinguish Ecological Sites

EDULABZ. Ans. (b) 7. The soft, porous layer with a good water-retaining capacity forms the

HORT 102: Soil Properties. Cultivated Plants: Lecture 15. [Teresa Koenig] Slide #: 1 Slide Title: Intro Information Slide

LAB 12: Soils. Name School. Patrich Physical Geography Lab 1

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION SEMI-DETAILED SURVEY EGG FARM KINGS LANGLEY HERTFORDSHIRE

STATE TAX COMMISSION OF MISSOURI ASSESSOR MANUAL

Homework Activity Jar Test for Soil Texture

Soil Texture = %Sand, Silt & Clay in a soil.

Vietnam soils. Soil K and soil P status. Rich in phosphorus >0.10% P 2 O 5. in hydromorphous soils >0.20% P 2. in ferralitic soils

5.1 Introduction to Soil Systems IB ESS Mrs. Page

Irrigating Olives. Janet Caprile UCCE Farm Advisor Alameda & Contra Costa Counties

Soil Quality / Understanding Soil Health what are we missing?

Soil Interpretations Erosion and Sedimentation Control Planning and Design Workshop

Soil Formation. 6.E.2.3 Explain how the formation of soil is related to the parent rock type and the environment in which it develops.

Introduction to Environmental Science. Soil Characteristics. Chapter 11 Soil

Problem soils & its management. Satira Udomsri, LDD

Soil Drainage. Dr. Jim Walworth Dept. of Soil, Water & Environmental Sci. University of Arizona

URBAN SOILS & SEATTLE EXAMPLES

Muswellbrook Coal Company No.1 Open Cut Extension Soil Study

Waking Up Your Sleepy Lawn. Joe Clark Rutgers Plant Biology Pathology Dept. Research Farm Supervisor

Making Sense of Soil Series

This definition is from the Soil Science Glossary (Soil Science Society of America).

SOIL DEPTH: THE THIRD DIMENSION

List of Equipment, Tools, Supplies, and Facilities:

Transcription:

REPORT On contract research for Royal Haskoning DHV SOILS AND AGRICULTURAL POTENTIAL FOR THE PROPOSED P166 SERVITUDE, MBOMBELA, MPUMALANGA PROVINCE By F.T. Seabi (Pr. Nat. Sci. 400370/11) & D.G. Paterson (Pr. Nat. Sci. 400463/04) February 2014 Report No. GW/A/2014/10 ARC-Institute for Soil, Climate and Water, Private Bag X79, Pretoria 0001, South Africa Tel (012) 310 2500 Fax (012) 323 1157

Declaration: I declare that the author of this study is a qualified, registered natural scientist (soil science), is independent of any of the parties involved and has no other conflicting interests. D.G. Paterson February 2014 2

CONTENTS Page 1 Introduction and Background 4 2 Study Area 4 2.1 Terrain 5 2.2 Climate 7 2.3 Geology 7 3 Methodology 8 4 Soils 8 4.1 Agricultural Potential 12 4.2 Erodibility 12 5 Impacts and Recommendations 13 5.1 Fatal Flaws 13 5.2 Agricultural Land 13 5.3 Alternatives 14 5.4 P166 Servitude 14 5.5 Conclusions 15 References Appendix: Soil Maps 3

1 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND The ARC-Institute for Soil, Climate and Water (ARC-ISCW) was requested by Royal Haskoning DHV to carry out a study regarding the proposed P166 route near Mbombela (Nelspruit). The aim of the report is to obtain supply information on the soils occurring, as well as their properties, characteristics and agricultural potential. 2 STUDY AREA The study area, comprising a servitude length/distance of approximately 32 kilometers, is located near Mbombela (Nelspruit), Mpumalanga. The route (with its alternatives) runs roughly parallel to the existing R40 road and crosses the N4 national road and on the western side of Mbombela city. The route also crosses the Crocodile River and Samora Machel Drive. Three alternative routes (namely White River Alternative, Phumlani 2 Alternative and Maggiesdal Alternative) and the main P166 route were studied for soils and agricultural potential. The main route and the alternatives are shown in Figure 1. The prevailing land use ranges from agricultural activities of local farms, residents buildings in occasions and informal settlements. The northern segments comprise intensive agriculture with irrigated macadamia orchards widespread. Localized informal settlements were found in this area. 4

2.1 Terrain The terrain of the entire route is comprised of undulating terrain with varying slopes of approximately 4-8%. The altitude varies from 860 900 m in the northern segments, 660 800 m in the middle segment and 790 820 m in the southern segments. 5

Figure 1 Study area 6

2.2 Climate Climate data was obtained from the national Land Type Survey (Koch & Schoeman, 1989). The climate of the area can be described as typical of the southern Lowveld, with warm to hot, moist to wet summers and dry, mild to cool winters. The main climatic parameters are given in Table 1. On average, 695.3 mm, or 83% of the annual average rainfall of 836.3 mm falls in the summer growing season (October to March). Frost is extremely rare. The extreme maximum temperature is 41.7 o C and the extreme minimum 2.0 o C. Table 1 Month Climate data for Mbombela area Rainfall Min. Temp Max. (mm) ( o C) Temp ( o C) Average frost dates Jan 152.5 18.6 29.1 Start date: Feb 121.3 18.5 29.0 End date: Mar 103.4 17.4 28.2 Days with frost: Apr 57.4 14.4 26.8 May 17.6 10.0 25.1 Jun 12.3 6.5 23.1 Jul 12.2 6.4 23.3 Heat units (hrs > 10 o C) Aug 10.4 8.7 24.9 Summer Sep 31.1 11.7 26.7 (Oct-Mar): 2338 Oct 69.8 14.7 27.2 Nov 111.7 16.7 27.6 Winter Dec 136.6 17.6 28.5 (Apr-Sept): 1371 Year 836.3 mm 20.0 o C (Average) 2.3 Geology The area is underlain mainly by gneiss and migmatite of the Nelspruit Granite Suite (Geological Survey, 1986). 7

3 METHODOLOGY The soils occurring were investigated by means of a soil auger, with an average point spacing of 200 to 300 m along the servitude path, to a maximum depth of 1 200 mm (or shallower, if a restricting layer, such as rock, was encountered). The soils were described and classified according to the South African soil classification system (Soil Classification Working Group, 1991). Similar soils were grouped into map segment classes, and the distribution of these mapping segments is shown on the map in the Appendix. The mapping segments were distinguished by different colour codes for descriptive purposes, as shown in the legend (Table 2). Wetland distribution information in the study area was acquired from the Water Research Commission (Nel et. al., 2011) and is depicted in blue on the maps provided. 4 SOILS The main characteristics of each of the soil mapping segments are given in Table 2 below. Soil samples were collected for analysis at six localities. The analysis results are shown in Table 3. 8

Table 2 Soil legend Class Dominant Subdominant Soil Form(s) Soil Form(s) Depth (mm) Soil Characteristics 1 Hutton Clovelly Reddish brown, structureless, loamy sand topsoil on reddishbrown to red, weakly structured, loamy sand to clay loam 750-1200+ subsoil, often gravelly. Underlying material is weathered rock. Greyish to brown, structureless, loamy sand topsoil on grey*, 2 Fernwood Westleigh, 750- structureless, loamy sand to sandy loam subsoil, often gravelly. Kroonstad 1200+ Underlying material is weathered rock, mottled soft plinthic or clayey material with signs of wetness Greyish to brown, structureless, loamy sand topsoil on grey*, 3 Fernwood Rock structureless, loamy sand to sandy loam subsoil, often gravelly. 600- Underlying material is weathered rock, mottled soft plinthic or 1200+ clayey material with signs of wetness. Rock outcrops occur in places. Greyish to reddish brown, structureless, loamy sand topsoil 4 Mispah Glenrosa 100-300 overlying hard or weathered rock. Rock outcrops occur in places throughout the mapping unit. 5 Rock - - Rock boulders are observable within the area. Rock outcrops are widespread. 6 Inaccessible - - - - Agric. Potential Moderate to high Low to moderate Low to moderate 7 Built up - - - None 8 Wetland - - Strong waterlogging hazard, with standing water in places. Zones of prolonged waterlogging conditions. None * Subsoils often appear yellowish or reddish in the moist state, but clearly become grey after drying out Low None 9

Table 3 Soil analytical results Sample point S1 S2 S3 S4 Soil Form Fw Hu Hu Fw Horizon A1 E A1 B1 A1 B1 A1 E Depth (mm) 0-200 200-600 0-250 250-1000 0-300 300-1200 0-300 300-600 Co-ordinates S E 25 o 27 9.24 30 o 57 2.7 25 o 32 3.91 30 o 56 59.28 25 o 30 33.11 30 o 56 11.31 25 o 22 7.71 30 o 57 57.53 Sand 84.0 82.0 68.0 56.0 64.0 60.0 82.0 72.0 Silt % 6.0 6.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 6.0 6.0 10.0 Clay 10.0 12.0 24.0 38.0 28.0 34.0 12.0 18.0 Na 0.108 0.090 0.109 0.109 0.142 0.162 0.101 0.080 K cmol 0.105 0.086 0.162 0.171 0.308 0.139 0.202 0.132 Ca kg -1 1.359 1.124 1.828 2.095 3.861 2.339 0.761 0.772 Mg 0.763 0.728 1.048 1.677 1.537 1.606 0.475 0.572 CEC 5.210 5.828 7.925 10.991 10.003 7.226 3.336 2.932 ph (H 2O) 6.10 6.52 5.68 5.60 6.32 5.68 5.54 5.22 Organic Carbon % 0.88 0.22 1.14 0.58 1.76 0.55 0.87 0.50 P (Bray 1) mg kg -1 35.05 23.97 3.92 0.45 2.65 0.53 8.79 0.66 10

Sample point S5 S6 Soil Form Hu Hu Horizon A1 B1 A1 B1 Depth (mm) 0-250 250-1200 0-250 250-1000 Co-ordinates S E 25 o 19 40.38 30 o 59 35.18 25 o 17 52.44 31 o 17 17.97 Sand 46.0 32.0 46.0 44.0 Silt % 12.0 6.0 12.0 6.0 Clay 42.0 62.0 42.0 50.0 Na 0.103 0.139 0.087 0.099 K cmol 0.777 0.247 0.172 0.174 Ca kg -1 3.709 2.147 0.400 0.397 Mg 1.612 1.325 0.506 0.719 CEC 10.855 10.914 4.760 6.989 ph (H 2O) 6.20 5.24 5.06 5.25 Organic Carbon % 1.47 1.01 1.18 0.64 P (Bray 1) mg kg -1 15.31 2.17 4.65 2.47 11

The analyses show the soil textures are light to slightly moderate (sandy clay to sandy clay loam), with the grey (Fernwood) soils having a much lower clay content than the red (Hutton) soils. The soils are mostly dystrophic (highly leached) with very low CEC values (indicating the low water-holding capacity of the soils and their sandy texture). Generally the ph values are low, indicating that the soils are slightly to moderately acidic. On average, the soils have very low P levels due to the acidity of the soils, which in turn causes P to be fixed in the soil and thus render it unavailable for plant uptake. In addition, most of the soils have not been previously cultivated which will also contribute to the low P levels. Organic carbon levels are low to moderate. 4.1 Agricultural Potential The soils have a generally light texture (loamy sand to sandy loam, clay content between 12 and 20%), with little or no structure. The only clay soils occur in the deeper layers of some of the profiles (Hutton). The main factor in determining agricultural potential is therefore the available rooting depth, as well as the colour. Where the soils are deeper (>750 mm), there is no limitation to water infiltration, while the red soils indicate a higher degree of natural fertility than the greyer soils, where iron, organic matter and other chemical elements have been removed. The proposed servitude and its alternative routes cross over wetland areas in several locations, more especially on the southern portion of the servitude (Part B soil map). The high potential Hutton soils dominate the northernmost portion of the servitude (Part A soil map), whereas the middle and southern portions are dominated by shallower soils 12

(Glenrosa and Mispah) and the low potential Fernwood soils (Part B soil map). Rock outcrops also occur in these areas. 4.2 Erodibility The soils in the area, due largely to their kaolinitic mineralogy, are inherently stable soils not prone to erosion. However, the slopes in the study area (typical of the wider surrounding landscape) mean that if the soil surface is exposed by means of removal of vegetation, water erosion can occur. The soils need to be protected by means of culverts, terraces etc and should be kept un-vegetated for as short a time as possible. 5 IMPACTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5.1 Fatal Flaws The P166 main route has no fatal flaws (based on soils occurring). It is only in places where the route crosses wetland areas (as depicted by the blue zones on the various soil maps) that pose a potential fatal flaw. The wetlands occurring are sensitive environmental areas that need to remain undisturbed and, if necessary, be protected. Where the road crosses or infringes on any wetland, care should be taken to avoid any disturbance or excess contribution to the sediment load in the stream. This should be planned in conjunction with the road engineers. 5.2 Agricultural Land The northern portion of the servitude (Part A soil map: White River alternative and P166_line) is comprised of high potential soils of the Hutton soil form. These soils are highly valued in the agricultural sector and their loss is unfavorable to the production capacity of the country. Intensive agricultural production in this area is widespread. A 13

portion of Maggiesdal Alternative is also comprised of these high potential soils, but less dominant. It is therefore expected that the development of the P166 route will have a permanent impact on these soils with regard to loss of production area and possible soil erosion inducement. 5.3 Alternatives Maggiesdal Alternative This route has a larger proportion of moderate to high potential soils than the existing servitude, so is not recommended. Phumlani 2 Alternative This route has slightly less moderate to high potential soils than the existing servitude, so would be recommended. White River Alternative This route has significantly more moderate to high potential soils, coupled with intensive agriculture, than the existing servitude, so would definitely not be recommended. 5.4 P166 Servitude The P166 route on the south of the N4 route is comprised mainly of low agricultural potential soils and therefore has less impact on the loss of production land. On the northern side of the N4, the P166 route immediately passes through cultivated farm lands (which are a concern on the bases of loss of agricultural land). The rest of the path up to the starting point of the White River alternative is comprised of shallow soil 14

depth to rocky areas of very low agricultural potential and therefore low impact on production land. 5.5 Conclusions Due to the sloping topography across most of the area, great care must be taken to ensure that soil erosion does not take place and this applies to all the alternative routes (White River, Phumlani and Maggiesdal alternatives) and the main route (P166 route). Soil conservation measures must be put in place in conjunction with engineering specialists in order to ensure that associated problems do not occur. Where the routes cross the wetlands, mitigation procedures (such as building of bridges) must be put in place in order to make sure that the natural state of the wetlands is preserved. Consultation with construction engineers is necessary in this regard. Based on an extensive occurrence of wetlands in the study area, it is recommended that further study/research be undertaken to fully comprehend their distribution and characteristics. Should the project receive approval, consultation with engineers with regard to the protection of these wetlands is imperative. 15

REFERENCES Geological Survey, 1986. 1:250 000 scale geological map 2530 Barberton. Council for Geoscience, Pretoria. Koch, F.G.L. & Schoeman, J.L., 1989. Climate data. In: Land types of the map 2530 Barberton. Mem. Agric. Nat. Res. S. Afr. No 13. Dept. Agric & Water Supply, Pretoria. MacVicar, C.N., de Villiers, J.M., Loxton, R.F, Verster, E., Lambrechts, J.J.N., Merryweather, F.R., le Roux, J., van Rooyen, T.H. & Harmse, H.J. von M., 1977. Soil classification. A binomial system for South Africa. ARC-Institute for Soil, Climate & Water, Pretoria. Nel, J.L., Driver, A., Strydom, W.F., Maherry, A., Petersen, C., Hill, L., Roux, D.J. Nienaber, S., Van Deventer, H., Swartz, E. and Smith-Adao, L.B. (2011) Atlas of freshwater ecosystem priority areas in South Africa. WRC Report No. TT 500/11. Water Research Commission, Pretoria, South Africa. 16

APPENDIX: Soil Maps 17

Prairie Hendrina 18

19

20