Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data Main entry under title: Managing our heritage resources: impact assessment.

Similar documents
Alternative Route Selection

TOWN OF AURORA HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENTS AND CONSERVATION PLANS GUIDE

Municipal Obligations Archaeological Heritage Screening. Heritage Conservation Branch Ministry of Parks, Culture and Sport November 14, 2018

STAGE 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF RATHBURN ROAD, FROM DUKE OF YORK BOULEVARD TO SHIPP DRIVE, CITY OF MISSISSAUGA. Submitted to:

Proposed St. Vital Transmission Complex

GUIDELINES FOR CULTURAL HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENTS

COUNTY OF LAMBTON OFFICIAL PLAN UPDATE BACKGROUND REPORT NO.

GUIDELINES FOR CULTURAL HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENTS

Cultural Heritage Resources

2.0 REGULATORY CONTEXT

Provincial Heritage Places Recognition Program

Alternative Routes. St. Vital to La Verendrye Station - Southern Loop Transmission Corridor. 20 different segments 4 segments common to all routes

THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK BYLAW NO A bylaw to adopt Amendment No. 6 to the Official Plan for The Regional Municipality of York

CULTURAL HERITAGE RESOURCES POLICIES

SUMMER VILLAGE OF SUNRISE BEACH

Presentation August 20, 2013

a) buildings, structures and artifacts of historical significance;

MUNICIPAL DISTRICT OF ROCKY VIEW NO.

Alternative Routes Determined

TABLE OF CONTENTS HISTORIC PRESERVATION ELEMENT I. INTRODUCTION HP. A. Purpose HP B. Assessment and Conclusions...

Official Plan Amendment Setbacks from Railway Operations

Municipal Services and Utilities

McKay Road Interchange and Salem / Lockhart Crossing

PLACENTIA JUNCTION COTTAGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN (AMENDMENT NO. 2, 2010)

OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLANS (OCPs) AND ZONING BYLAWS (ZBs): PLANNING FOR THE FUTURE

EIA process in Malaysia. Approaches and Strategies. Way Forward

An Introduction to the Far North Land Use Strategy

Central Lake Ontario Conservation Conservation Lands Master Plan

TRCA Field Staking Protocol December 2016

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS. Preparation of National Register of Historic Places. Nominations for the following:

Chapter 6 cultural heritage

OFFICIAL PLAN UPDATE PLANNING ACT SECTION 26

CULTURAL HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT TERMS OF REFERENCE

AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY FOR THE RICHARDS, TEXAS FARM-TO-MARKET ROAD 149 FIBER OPTIC CABLE PROJECT IN MONTGOMERY COUNTY, TEXAS

Purpose of Report...1. Planning Framework Provincial Policy Statement Draft PPS...2. Ontario Heritage Act...3

POLICY AMENDMENT AND LAND USE AMENDMENT TUXEDO PARK (WARD 9) CENTRE STREET N AND 26 AVENUE NE BYLAWS 36P2017 AND 234D2017

December 11, December 10, 2015

STAGE 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE MISSISSAUGA BRT (EAST), CITY OF MISSISSAUGA. Submitted to:

TOWN OF AURORA ARCHITECTURAL SALVAGE PROGRAM GUIDE

APPENDIX G. Historical Resources Overview Documentation

OFFICE of the FIRE COMMISSIONER. Recreational Vehicles Life Safety Requirements

Rapid Transit Implementation Working Group September 14, 2017

Fire Protection Guide for Land Use Planning CONSIDERATIONS DURING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

150 Eighth Street Zoning By-law Amendment Application Preliminary Report

Fire and Emergency Services Newfoundland and Labrador. Public Hearings Proposed Lower Churchill Hydroelectric Generation Project March 2011

Telecommunication Facility Policy

1. The EIA System in Japan

Commissioners Road West Realignment Environmental Assessment

Red Fox Commercial Outline Plan

Lawrencetown Beach & Rainbow Haven Beach

PLANNING FOR THE SUPPLY OF BUILDING AND ROOFING STONE The Planning Officers Society 2008

ARTICLE VI: SITE PLAN REVIEW

Manitoba. Round Table. for Sustainable. Development

Ashbridges Bay Erosion and Sediment Control Project

GREATER SHEPPARTON CULTURAL HERITAGE AWARDS GUIDELINES

Slope Stability Management Framework

STAGE 1 2 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF YONGE STREET SUBWAY EXTENSION, LOTS 37-41, CONCESSION EYS, TOWNSHIP OF MARKHAM, CITY OF TORONTO, YORK COUNTY

Commissioners Road West Realignment Environmental Assessment

RV Park/Campground Operator s Manual

TOWN OF SAUGEEN SHORES OFFICIAL PLAN

Significant Tree Register

Synopsis of 50 years of Planning in the Greater Golden Horseshoe (GGH), Ontario, Canada. Olusola Olufemi 2015

Summary of Other State Archeological Guidelines

City of Larkspur. Notice of Mitigated Negative Declaration for the 285

FORMER CANADIAN FORCES BASE (CFB) ROCKCLIFFE SECONDARY PLAN. Official Plan Amendment XX to the Official Plan for the City of Ottawa

THAT staff be authorized to proceed with the permanent road closure of Park Lane, within Hazelwood Cemetery.

The Rideau Canal Corridor: Planning for a Proud Future. Heather Thomson Heritage Planner Parks Canada

Describing the Integrated Land Management Approach

THE FUTURE OF THE MCABEE FOSSIL BEDS HERITAGE SITE - Aligning the management of the site with fossil management approaches

Design Around Waterways and Wetlands

Shell Upstream Americas Resource Use

and Richmond Street West - Official Plan Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

12 AMENDMENT NO. 149, TOWN OF MARKHAM HIGHWAY 404 NORTH SECONDARY PLAN

Oweninny Wind Farm. Oweninny Environmental Impact Statement Appendix 13. Cultural Heritage Correspondence

HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES POLICIES

1.0 PLANNING MARKHAM S FUTURE CONTENTS

Memo. B R A Y H e r i t a g e

F2. Draft Archaeological and Cultural Heritage Net Effects Analysis & Comparative Evaluation Report

COBOURG Cobourg Heritage Advisory Committee. Alison Torrie Lapaire Planner I - Heritage

CITY OF SASKATOON COUNCIL POLICY

APPENDIX 9: Archaeological Assessment by Ken Phillips

Waco Mammoth Site Special Resource Study

1 STATUTORY PUBLIC MEETING INFORMATION REPORT PROPOSED AMENDMENT NO 6 TO THE YORK REGION OFFICIAL PLAN, 2010 ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES

5. Initiating a restoration project

The Regional Municipality of Halton. Chair and Members of the Planning and Public Works Committee

Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property Roncesvalles Avenue

THE PROTECTION AND PRESERVATION OF ANCIENT MONUMENTS LAW

Albion Hills Conservation Area Master Plan. Public Information Session

Garden District Heritage Conservation District Study

Bostwick Road. Municipal Class Environmental Assessment. Public Information Centre #2 June 14, City of London

APPENDIX L3. Table of Contents. SWP EA Information Sheets

MINIMUM STANDARDS: ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND PALAEONTOLOGICAL COMPONENTS OF IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTS

APPENDIX 'D' Archaeological Investigation

BURNT BERRY POND COTTAGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REGISTRATION

TRCA Roles and Responsibilities in Planning and Development

8 Oak Street - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Bloor St. W. Rezoning - Preliminary Report

European code of good practice: "ARCHAEOLOGY AND THE URBAN PROJECT"

GUARDED STATUS INFORMATION and REQUIREMENTS For OWNERS AND OPERATORS Of REFRIGERATION PLANTS

Development Reviews. An overview of the Commission s review process, primarily in Klickitat County. March 13, 2018

Transcription:

Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data Main entry under title: Managing our heritage resources: impact assessment. Rev ed. Previously published 1993 in separate English and French eds. Text in English and Frencll. Title on added t.p. inverted: Comment gerer nos ricllesses du patrimoine. SBN 0-7711-1450-8 1. Cultural property, Protection of-- Manitoba. 2. Historic sites-- Government policy-- Manitoba. 3. Historic buildings- Government policy-- Manitoba. 4. Manitoba-- Antiquities-- Collection and preservation.. Manitoba. Historic Resources Branch FC3362.M36 1995 363.69097127 C95-962004-4 F1062.8.M36 1995

Manitoba Culture, Heritage and Citizenship Managing Our Heritage Resources mpact Assessment 1

Working Together. The Heritage Resources Act (1986) provides for "Heritage Resource n1pact Assessments." These studies are intended to reduce the risk of last-minute discovery, and possible destruction, of heritage resources and human remains at land development sites. The process is a public initiative, administered and facilitated by the Historic Resources Branch, Manitoba Culture, Heritage and Citizenship. For years land developers have assessed the environmental and socio-economic effects of their projects. The Heritage Resow ces Act can require developers to conduct similar assessments for the effects on heritage resources. A Success Story. n 1984, an oil company planned to build a pipeline in southwestern Manitoba. When the Historic Resources Branch realized the project would involve land where archeological materials had been found in the past, it requested the company to conduct an "impact assessment" to evaluate the effects its project would have on the local communitys heritage resources. The ard1aeological consulta nt hired by the oil company to prepare the assessment learned that part of the pipeline would run through a bison drive site. (Bison drives were a method used by Aboriginal people centuries ago to herd, corral and kill bison.) Not wanting to destroy this heritage resource, the company built that section of its pipeline about 30 metres away on unused road allowance. Through the cooperation of the oil company, the local municipality, the landowner, the consultant and the Historic Resources Branch, this valuable archaeological site was preserved. What Are Heritage Resources? Heritage resources are works of nature or human endeavor that have prehistoric, historic, cultural, natural, scientific or aesthetic value. These include artifacts such as arrowheads or paleontological objects sud1 as fossils. Prehistoric or historic human occupation sites, historic landscapes, buildings or stmctures, and the exterior portions of buildings or structures are also examples of heritage resources. The Historic Resources Branch has prepared a pamphlet, "Heritage Objects," which discusses the subject in further detail. 2

Where Are Heritage Resources Most Likely to Be Found? Except for buildings or structures, heritage resources are usually associated with certain kinds of landscapes. These include prominent hills or knohs, the ancient shorelines (usually beach ridges) of glacial Lake Agassiz, deltas and eskers created by retreating glaciers, and lands located near water sources. What s a Heritage Resource mpact Assessment? An impact assessment is a written evaluation of the effect that a proposed development project may have upon heritage resources or human remains at a site. The assessment outlines the project, describes the cultural and natural context of the development, identifies the impact of the proj@ct, and r@comm@nds ways to avoid or lessen its impact on heritage resources or human remains. 3

Will Be Required to Do an mpact Assessment? Any work, activity, development or project that alters or disturbs the surface of the land is subject to review by Manitoba Culture, Heritage and Citizenship. The Department participates in a referral system whereby provincial and municipal agencies issuing permits or licences for development projects circulate the applications they receive for review and comment. Developers may also submit proposals directly to the Department. Proposed projects are screened in terms of their locations, the types of landforms involved, the types and amount of ground disturbances to occur, previous land disturbances, nearness to known heritage resources or areas already examined, and proximity to sources of water. Those projects judged likely to affect heritage resources or human remains may be examined further and, if there is reason to believe that heritage resources or human remains may be damaged or destroyed by the project, the owner or lessee of the site may be required, via a written order w1der the Act, to apply for a Heritage Permit authorizing the project. f the evaluation of the permit application confirms that heritage resources or human remains may be adversely affected by the proposed project, a Heritage Resource mpact Assessment will be required before the permit is issued. As examples, the following types of projects may require an impact assessment: 1. Linear projects, including highways, roads, transmission lines and pipelines; 2. Extractive projects, including mining, quarrying and land filling; 3. mpoundment projects, including dams, reservoirs and tailing ponds; 4. ntensive land-use projects, including industrial, residential, commercial, recreational and agricultural sites and land reclamation work. Throughout Canada, wherever heritage resource impact assessment procedures have been introduced, over 90% of all projects proceed without the need for further assessment after the initial screening. Heritage Sites. Under The Heritage Resources Act, the Minister may designate any site in the province containing a significant heritage resource as a "Heritage Site". Such designation must follow a prescribed process, but once a Notice of lntent has been issued or a site designated, any activity on the Heritage Site must be authorized by a Heritage Permit, which is obtained before the activity begins. fit appears that the proposed project will adversely affect the site, a Heritage Resource mpact Assessment may be required before the Heritage Permit is issued. Further information about Heritage Sites can be found in the pamphlet, "Designating Heritage Sites in Manitoba", published by the Historic Resources Branch.

How Do Do an mpact Assessment? fa developer is required to conduct an impact assessment, a qualified archaeologist or other heritage resource consultant should be engaged to carry out the necessary research and field work, and to prepare the required written report which will be submitted to the Department for evaluation. The Historic Resources Branch has detailed guidelines for conducting Heritage Resource mpact Assessments and would be pleased to assist developers in making arrangements for these studies when required. s mpact Assessment Costly? Experience has shown that budgeting up to 1% of the capital costs of a project is generally adequate for carrying out an impact assessment and any measures that are needed to rescue or protect heritage resources. s

Heritage Resource mpact Assessment (HRA) Process Project proposal submitted to Historic Resources Branch (HRB) Proposal screened for its impact J on heritage resources JL...----------..., Screening determines no impact J Proponent advised to,...p.roc..eed.. w i ili p ro..jec t...,... HRB determines impact to heritage resources has been managed Screening determines impact Proponent advised to conduct HRlA Proponent selects consultant Consultant acquires terms of reference and uecessary field permit from HRB Consultant conducts HRA HRA report submitted to HRB for review....., Proponent advised to proceed wiili project HRB determine!> further conditions to be met by proponent Additiounl studirs &/or mitigntum do1ze Rtport rcfarrd t" HRB J 6

Will the Project Be Delayed? An "average" impact assessment takes from 5-20 days for planning and preparation, travel, field inspection and report writing. Larger projects, however, can require more time. n order to ensure that a developer is not burdened with paying for an impact assessment that is not needed, the Historic Resources Branch may conduct a preliminary field examination of the site. This "pre-impact assessment" determines if heritage resources or human remains are actually present at the site and provides an evaluation of them. Presented below is a step-by-step description of the Heritage Resource mpact Assessment process from the time a proposal is received by the Historic Resources Branch until the impact assessment has been completed. 1. Project proposal is submitted to Branch by proponent or other permitting or licensing agency. 2. Proposal is screened for its potential to affect heritage resources or human remains. 3a. fscreening determines no impact, the proponent is advised to proceed with the project. 3b. fscreening determines impact is likely to occur, Brauch staff may visit project site to conduct a preliminary field examination. 4. f heritage resources or human remains may be adversely affected, the proponent is advised that a Heritage Resource mpact Assessment will be necessary. 5. The proponent prepares terms of reference for the project, in consultation with the Brauch, and selects a consultant who obtains the necessary heritage field permit. 6. The consultant conducts the Heritage Resource mpact Assessment. 7. The consultant submits the impact assessment report to the Branch for review. 8a. The Branch determines that impact to heritage resources or human remains has been managed and the proponent is advised to proceed with the project; or 8b. The Branch determines that further conditions must be met by the proponent. 9. Additional studies and/or mitigation are completed. 10. The resulting report is submitted to the Branch for review. 11. The proponent is advised to proceed with the project. This pamphlet has been designed as an introduction to Sections 12 through 14 of Part 11 of The Heritage Resources Act, Protection of Sites. tis not intended as a substitute for the legislation, butshould be used in conjunction with The Heritage Resources Act, which is available from: Statutory Publications Manitoba Culture, Heritage and Citizenship Basement, 200 Vaughan Street Winnipeg, MB R3C 1T5 More detailed information concerning heritage resource impact assessments or The Heritage Resources Act can be obtained from: Historic Resources Brauch Manitoba Culture, Heritage and Citizenship Main Floor, 213 Notre Dame Avenue Winnipeg, MB R3B 1N3 Telephone: (204) 945-2118 7

_, Our Heritage. Worth Keeping. Worth Sharing. 8