Food Waste Digestion in Water and Sludge. Daniel Gary, Rob Morton and Chi-Chung Tang

Similar documents
NOTICE OF PREPARATION ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND PUBLIC SCOPING MEETING

APPENDIX C STATEMENT OF WORK TECHNICAL EXHIBITS-HANDWORK

APPENDIX C STATEMENT OF WORK TECHNICAL EXHIBITS

Private On Site Fire Hydrant N/A N/A Fire Flow Requirements Private On Site Fire Sprinkler System

City of Los Angeles C ALIFORNIA

City of Los Angeles C ALIFORNIA

CITY OFLOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA

March 30, Keyes Van Nuys Honda Dealership Keyes Motor, Inc.

City of Los Angeles CALIFORNIA

City of Los Angeles CALIFORNIA

This is not a New Idea! Food scraps collection 100 years ago:

5.15 PUBLIC SERVICES Fire Protection and Emergency Services. 5. Environmental Analysis REGULATORY FRAMEWORK.

2017 VWEA Education Seminar May 11 th, 2017

7. Consultation and Coordination

GRAND VALLEY REGIONAL BIOSOLIDS AUTHORITY (GVRBA)

Evaluation and Pilot Testing of a Direct Turbo Dryer at a 5.0 MGD Facility. Brandon Gott

RESOLUTION NO

March 14, Will Allen Director of Strategic Conservation Planning

Sludge Dryer Wet Scrubber Used to Produce Renewable Energy

5.10 LAND USE AND PLANNING

Biosolids Technology Fact Sheet Recessed-Plate Filter Press

Parts Standardization & Management Committee (PSMC)

December 18, January 14, 2019, 5:00 P.M. 7:00 P.M. See below for additional information.

Frequently Asked Questions Refuse (Garbage) Rates, July 1, 2015

Biosolids dewatering using super absorbent polymers (SAPs) Mostafa M.Noureldin Illinois Institute of Technology

March 29, Angels Landing Project Angels Landing Partners, LLC

How Food Waste Disposers Can Benefit Municipalities

Komline-Sanderson Paddle Dryer. Drying technology for biosolids, sludges and by-products

Notice of Preparation

a. Section includes planting soils specified by composition of the mixes.

integrated sludge treatment combined sludge drying and incineration

RELilSE FORM. Date: Printed Name of Representative: Organrzation N. Signature: James R. Kuhl. Environmental Services Bureau, City of Long Beach

Comparison of Options for Biosolids Dewatering

High-Efficiency Clothes Washer Retailer List October 2010

Inline Sludge Screens Municipal and Industrial Applications

2014 UTILITY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM EAF AND GAF AGENCIES

3.10 LAND USE PLANNING

MWEA Annual Conference 2013 Grandville CWP Egg Shaped Digester Unconventional Startup

Project facts that will help me to understand the I-710 Corridor Project and DEIR/EIS

FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA DOWNERS GROVE SANITARY DISTRICT BIOSOLIDS HANDBOOK

2. INTRODUCTION 2.1 AUTHORITY 2.2 PURPOSE AND INTENT 2.3 SITE LOCATION

Innovative IoT solution helps Emerson Grind2Energy turn food scraps into fuel

Ecological Landscaping Association's 2013 Conference & Eco-Marketplace February 27, Geoff Kuter, Ph.D. Agresource Inc.

BROOKE PETERSON, AICP Associate Principal

3.0 Project Description

Duarte Station Specific Plan

September 20, 2017 ENV EIR

Biosolids and Composting in Midwest City, OK

Appendix B. Best Practices. Retrofit of an Existing Park. 1. Improving Existing Parks. Best Practices Catalog 6/6/2013. Dixieanne Park, Sacramento

I. INTRODUCTION. A. Project Location

3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Overview of Haarslev s Approach to THP

HIGHWAY PROJECTS - Upcoming Procurements

The InSinkErator City of Philadelphia. How Food Waste Disposers Can Benefit Municipalities

CITY OF LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF PREPARATION

Organic Waste Management in New York State: Potential Legislation

Appendix C: Aesthetics

LOOK BOOK pacificsales.com/inspiration

ANAEROBIC DIGESTERS HEATED BY DIRECT STEAM INJECTION: EXPERIENCE AND LESSONS LEARNED

3-10 LAND USE AND PLANNING

Your Logo Here. Recycle with us today! Grow with us tomorrow! Kevin Anderson

Pebble Beach Community Services District

Field Validation of an On-Line FTIR Analyzer for Measuring Total Siloxane Content in Landfill Gas

The leader in gas dehydration & filtration

Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 Draft Environmental Impact Statement/ Environmental Impact Report APPENDIX N

Fifth Annual Waste Treatment Symposium, September Kelly Brown, BDP Industries, Inc.

Project Facts about the I-710 Corridor Project and RDEIR/SDEIS

Chapter 12. Land Use

Workshop #4.2 Compost

Huber s New Q-Press. Presented by: Steve Macomber Huber Technology, Inc.

Green Roofs: A Sustainable Technology

Biosolids Management Utilizing Solar and Thermal Processes

City of Glendora / Unincorporated Glendora STUDY AREA PROFILE

HOW TO SELECT AN INDIRECT THERMAL TECHNOLOGY FOR INDUSTRIAL MATERIALS PROCESSING

City of Los Angeles CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF EXTENSION

Venice Pumping Plant Dual Force Main Project Draft EIR

Optimize. Innovate. Deliver. Engineering the Future of Bus Rapid Transit

Does your business handle food products? STEP 3. Tuesday Inspection:

Sedimentation. Photo Credit: Virginia Department of Health

House TEA LU - FHWA High Priority Project Earmarks (109th Congress)

Call to Artists Public Art for Los Angeles Metro Stations

HOUSEHOLD. Clean Sweep

HUBER Belt Dryer BT for sewage sludge drying

How to Select the Right Compost. Monica Ozores-Hampton University of Florida/IFAS

TRANSPORTATION MATTERS. Creating solutions for sustainable and accessible places

Metcalf And Eddy Wastewater Engineering Wordpress

Ventura County Stormwater Technical Guidance Manual

Recycling and Solid Waste Management Report

BIOSOLIDS PROGRAM PLAN OF OPERATION

Overview of Biosolids Composting Science, Production and Use Albert Cox Kuldip Kumar

GLWA - Biosolids Dryer Facility

LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (LACMTA)

Sewage Sludge Disposal in Ohio for 2007

Sewage Sludge Disposal in Ohio for 2003

WATER: Just right. AIR: How. Compost Moisture Squeeze Test. WATER: Too wet. Squeeze Test part II. WATER: Too dry 1/27/2017

Small Scale Pilot Plant Thermal Dryer for Sewage Sludge Dewatering System A Preliminary Study

Multi-Family Recycling Discussion Paper

Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 Draft Environmental Impact Statement/ Environmental Impact Report APPENDIX Q

Soils and Fertilizers. Leo Espinoza Soils Specialist

4/4/2012. Topics. Soil mixes for bioretention areas need to balance three primary design objectives for optimum performance: Bioretention Soil Mixes

Transcription:

Food Waste Digestion in Water and Sludge Daniel Gary, Rob Morton and Chi-Chung Tang

Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts LANCASTER Solid waste disposal; wastewater collection and treatment for half of Los Angeles County population SANTA CLARITA Pacific Ocean LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE PALMDALE GLENDALE SIE RRA MA DRE PASADENA MONROVIA DUA RTE AZUSA GLENDORA ARCADIA SAN MARINO CLA REMONT IRWINDALE SAN DIMAS SAN GABRIEL WEST HOLLYWOOD ALHAMBRA COVINA LA VERNE BEVERLY HILLS EL MONTE WEST COVINA ROSEMEAD POM ONA MONTEREY PARK LA PUE NTE WALNUT MONTEBELLO CITY OF INDUSTRY VERNON PICO RIVERA DIAMOND BAR BELL WHITTIER INGLEWOOD LA HAB RA HE IGHTS SOUTH GATE SANTA FE SPRINGS DOWNEY EL SEGUNDO LYNW OOD HAWTHORNE PARAMOUNT NORW ALK GARDE NA COMPTON BELLFLOWER LA MIRADA MANHATTA N BEACH CERRITOS REDONDO BEACH LAKEW OOD CARSON TORRANCE HAWAIIAN GARDENS SIGNAL HILL LOMITA LONG BEACH PALOS VERDES ESTATES ROLLING HILLS RANCHO PALOS VERDES LOS ANGELES

Need to Address Alternatives to Landfilling Food Wastes 16% of wastes in landfills are food wastes (CalRecycle) Limited remaining landfill spaces locally Method to reduce green house gas emissions Can convert some food wastes to energy and reduce the volume of food waste requiring disposal

Project Goals Determine if it is feasible to digest 10-30% by weight food wastes in waste water sludge and in water Characterize food wastes Provide some economic data for determining full-scale operation costs

Brief Review of Digestion Stabilize sludge and reduce vector attraction Bacteria convert organics (such as wastewater sludge, food waste) into cellmass and vapor, reducing the total amount of solids in the digested product

Brief Review of Digestion Different operating temperatures (this study mesophilic 95 o F) and with or without air (this study anaerobic) Energy recovery can occur if anaerobically digested - methane is produced

Anaerobic Digestion Process Starting Products Liquefaction Acid Production Biogas Production End Products Hydrolytic Bacteria Acid Forming Bacteria Methane Forming Bacteria Sludge from JWPCP or Water Liquefied soluble organic compounds Simple organic acids Digester gas Food Wastes Insoluble compounds (inorganic, organic, water) Biosolids

Other California Food Waste Digestion Projects EBMUD co-digestion of food wastes with sludge at Oakland facility U.C. Davis On-Site Power digesting food wastes for commercial application in food packaging facilities Novato digesting food wastes City of Los Angeles pilot program digesting food wastes

East Bay Municipal Utility District Food Waste Preparation

EBMUD Paddle Finisher Paddle finisher results in a slurry, which aids in hydrolysis step of digestion

JWPCP Research Project Commencement Obtain food waste Set up and start bench scale digesters with sludge as media and with water as media Set up program to pre-treat food wastes, removing non-organics and reduce particle size (aid in hydrolysis)

JWPCP Operation 4 M gallon each 18 day solids retention time (SRT) 75% primary solids/ 25% TWAS JWPCP Research Study Bench Scale 10 Liter 18 day SRT 75% primary solids/ 25% TWAS Bench Scale digesters perform similarly to full scale digester

Food Waste Sources Vendor No. 1 Private waste handler Classifies residential wastes Vendor No. 2 LACSD material separation & transfer station Food waste from malls

JWPCP Research Food Waste Conditioning Program Screened, 0.25-0.5 kitchen scraps with extraneous matter Meat Grinder Grinded product 0.125-0.25 pellets Pure food wastes 3-10% hand-picked rejects (mostly metal, plastics, glass) Blended Digester Feed Water or sludge

Vendor No. 1 20% Food Waste Volatile Solids Destruction 100% 80% Control Food Wastes/H2O Food Waste/Sludge Avg Control Dig. = 50.4% Avg Food Waste/H20 = 59.3% Avg Food Waste/Sludge = 56.3% 60% VSD 40% 20% FW Batch 1 FW Batch 2 0% 08/02/08 08/17/08 09/01/08 09/16/08 10/01/08 10/16/08 10/31/08

Vendor No. 1 20% Food Waste Volatile Solids Destruction 100% 80% Control Food Wastes/H2O Food Waste/Sludge Avg. Control Dig. = 56.0% Avg. Food Waste/H20 = 36.8%; Avg. Food Waste/Sludge 43.5% 60% VSD 40% 20% 0% Food Wastes Batch 3 Food Wastes Batch 4 12/28/08 1/12/09 1/27/09 2/11/09 2/26/09 3/13/09 3/28/09

Vendor No. 1 20% Food Waste Gas Production 25 20 Control Food Wastes/H2O Food Waste/Sludge Avg. Control Sludge = 6.19 Avg. Food Waste/H2O = 13.4 Avg. Food Waste/Sludge = 16.4 Gas Prod. L/Day 15 10 5 0 FW Batch 1 FW Batch 2 8/10/08 8/30/08 9/19/08 10/9/08 10/29/08

20 16 Vendor No. 1 20% Food Waste Gas Production Control Food Wastes/H2O Food Waste/Sludge Avg. Control Sludge = 7.75 Avg. Food Waste/H2O = 5.85 Avg. Food Waste/Sludge = 10.2 Gas Prod. L/Day 12 8 4 0 Food Wastes Batch 3 Food Wastes Batch 4 12/30/08 1/14/09 1/29/09 2/13/09 2/28/09 3/15/09

Vendor No. 1 BOD of 20% Food Wastes For Different Batches (varies from batch to batch) 50,000 44,400 40,000 BOD mg/l 30,000 20,000 19,100 27,700 22,200 24,600 15,800 17,800 10,000 11,100 0 Control Sludge First Batch Second Batch Third Batch Fourth Batch

Why Different Vendor No. 1 Batches had Different BODs and Digestion Performances Food Waste from Vendor 1 was small kitchen wastes Black and dirt like, not specifically food wastes Different batches had varying amounts of yard clippings and dirt

Vendor No. 2 Food Wastes

Vendor No. 2 BOD of Different Batches 50,000 (Waste Source More Consistent) BOD mg/l 40,000 30,000 20,000 19,100 28,000 33,000 31,000 39,000 10,000 0 Control Sludge 1 2 3 4 Batch

100% Volatile Solids Destruction Vendor No. 2 10% Food Waste vs. Control Sludge 80% 60% 40% 20% Control Sludge Food Wastes/H2O Food Wastes/Sludge Avg. Control Sludge = 53.8% Avg. Food Wastes/H2O = 93.8% Avg. Food Wastes/Sludge =81.8% 0% 06/14/09 06/24/09 07/04/09 07/14/09 07/24/09 08/03/09 08/13/09

35 30 Gas Production Vendor No. 2 10% Food Waste vs. Control Sludge Control Sludge Food Waste/H2O Food Waste/Sludge Avg. Control Sludge =6.93 L/day Avg. Food Waste/H2O = 12.0 L/day Avg. Food Waste/Sludge = 20.6 L/day 25 Gas Prod. L/Day 20 15 10 5 0 06/13/09 06/23/09 07/03/09 07/13/09 07/23/09 08/02/09 08/12/09

100% Volatile Solids Destruction Vendor No. 2 20% Food Waste vs. Control Sludge 80% VSD 60% 40% 20% Control Sludge Food Waste/H2O Food Waste/Sludge Avg. Control Sludge = 54.9% Avg. Food Waste /H2O = 76.6% Avg. Food Waste/Sludge = 75.2% 0% 08/11/09 08/21/09 08/31/09 09/10/09 09/20/09 09/30/09 10/10/09 10/20/09

Gas Production Vendor No. 2 20% Food Waste vs. Control Sludge 40 35 30 Control Sludge Food Waste/H2O Food Waste/Sludge Avg. Control Sludge =6.86 L/day Avg. Food Waste/H2O = 6.79 L/day Avg. Food Waste/Sludge = 24.9 L/day Gas Prod. L/Day 25 20 15 10 5 0 08/11/09 08/21/09 08/31/09 09/10/09 09/20/09 09/30/09 10/10/09 10/20/09

Volatile Solids Destruction Vendor No. 2 30% Food Waste vs. Control Sludge 100% 80% Control Sludge Food Waste/Sludge Avg. Control Sludge = 52.8% Avg. Food Waste/Sludge = 65.3% VSD 60% 40% 20% 0% 10/18/09 11/02/09 11/17/09 12/02/09 12/17/09

Gas Production Vendor No. 2 30% Food Waste vs. Control Sludge 30 25 Control Sludge Food Waste/Sludge Avg. Control Sludge = 6.38 L/Day Avg. Food Waste/ Sludge. = 19.5 L/Day Gas Prod. L/Day 20 15 10 5 0 10/15/09 10/25/09 11/04/09 11/14/09 11/24/09 12/04/09 12/14/09

Summary Vendor No. 2 Volatile Solids Destruction 100% 80% 10% 20% 30% 93.8% 76.6% 81.8% 75.2% 60% 54.9% 53.8% 52.8% 65.3% VSD 40% 20% 0% Control Water Sludge

Summary Vendor No. 2 Digester Gas Production 30 25 20 10% 20% 30% 20.6 24.9 19.5 Gas Prod. 15 L/Day 12.0 10 6.9 6.9 6.4 6.8 5 0 Control Water Sludge

Volatile Acids 10,000 1,000 10% 20% 30% 5,380 350 400 Volatile Acids mg/l 100 10 11 21 30 46 16 1 Control Water Sludge

Optimal Weight % Food Waste 10% food waste in sludge Chance of building up volatile acids if digested in water Minimum amount of non-digested solids build up in digesters at 10% food waste digestion in sludge

Initial Economic Feasibility Analysis Digest using 10% food waste/90% sludge Size for 100 tons/week food wastes - EBMUD size - (Modifications estimated to cost $1M) Use methane gas to offset imported natural gas Can charge a tipping fee for food waste of $10/ton Costs for extra solids discharged from wastewater treatment plant, O & M, and capital costs

100 Tons/Week Food Waste Initial Economic Feasibility Analysis Savings/Income or Cost Annual savings and receipts Charge Tipping Fee Tipping fee $ 50,000 $0 No Tipping Fee Not importing natural gas $250,000 $250,000 Total annual savings $300,000 $250,000 Annual costs Amortized capital $ 60,000 $ 60,000 Non-digested food wastes disposal $140,000 $140,000 Operation and maintenance $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Total annual cost $250,000 $250,000 Total annual benefit $ 50,000 $0

Conclusion Source of food waste is important Readily soluble, High BOD Determined 10% food waste digestion in sludge was optimal method Produce more digester gas but get more nondigested solids in effluent from the digester Modifications to energy recovery hardware and contract need to occur to make food waste digestion economical at the JWPCP

Questions

Future Work Dewatering Test -- to what percentage can food wastes/sludge composite be dewatered Economic comparison digestion vs. composting food waste Conduct a large scale test at Joint Water Pollution Control Plant Conduct a large scale test at another LACSD Facility (landfill or wastewater treatment plant)

Potential Food Waste Digestion Applications for LACSD Closing local landfill in 2013 and will transport solid waste to remote landfill in Imperial County (over 1M lbs food waste/day) No energy recovery available yet at remote landfill Potential to digest at various treatment plants