Connecting Nine Buildings in Central Jakarta Together with the MRT. Mulyadi Janto, Director, PT Farpoint Prima

Similar documents
Phase I Redevelopment Plan. First Community Meeting

Land Use/Transport Integration. Land Use as an end Transport as a means

Field trip report. Field trip transport planning, , 2 ECTS, 2017S

SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT & INTEGRATED LAND USE PLANNING

Key Themes and Responses May 2016

«Corridor» designs in town planning : Sustainable planning for large cities in developed countries

Energy Efficient Strategies for Urban Transportation Planning

TOD Planning in China: Problems and Solutions. Yin Jia, Founder, EFC Engeering Consulting Co. Ltd.

greenprint midtown SUSTAINABILITY ACTION PLAN 2012

Sustainable City of the Future LUSAIL

Shift Rapid Transit Public Participation Meeting May 3, 2017

Don Mills Crossing Study and Celestica Lands Development Application Community Meeting, Open House, and Breakout Discussions

Taming Tysons Corner Transforming the Quintessential Edge City

Urban Design Manual PLANNING AROUND RAPID TRANSIT STATIONS (PARTS) Introduction. Station Study Areas

Integrated Multi Modal Public Transit Hub

Cities are built for movement

TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT

Strasbourg SUMP Award: Finalist factsheet. Local Transport facts. Urban transport policy objectives of the city:

DOWNTOWN AREA PLAN. June 9, 2009

Portland was a beautiful city, but in the 1960s and 1970s, its population grew very fast.

City of Toronto Official Plan Indicators

Walnut Creek BART Station

[PLANNING RATIONALE] For Site Plan Control and Lifting of Holding Zone By-Law 101 Champagne Avenue. May 23, 2014

THE NEIGHBORHOOD TODAY

URBAN TRANSPORT PLANNING and DECISION-MAKING for LARGE URBAN PROJECTS in TURKEY. EK Istanbul Technical University Istanbul, Turkey.

University of the District of Columbia Van Ness Campus Master Plan Community Open House 3. December 8, 2010

Without Planning? Incremental Emergence of High Density Mixed Use Centres in Mega-Manila

Integrated Urban Development. April Reflections from the NZPI Study Tour of Portland, Seattle and Vancouver

Edmonton s Transit Oriented Development Journey

This Review Is Divided Into Two Phases:

Financing Transportation Successes from other Jurisdictions

ACSA/AIA Housing Design Education Award

Blue Line LRT Extension

City of Hermosa Beach Administrative Policy #

10/19/2016. Chapter 22 Lecture Outline Urbanization. Urbanization and Sustainable Cities. Outline

Port Credit Local Advisory Panel October 20 th Meeting

2.0 THE PLATINUM TRIANGLE VISION

Are we creating and exploiting synergies on our transit investments?

Subregion 4 Central Avenue-Metro Blue Line Corridor Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) Implementation Project. Community Meeting April 27, 2011

Final Master Plan and Development Control Regulations

retail 26 retail retail 27

Urban Development for Inclusive Growth

Welcome to Greenwood Village Corporate Capital of Colorado

Sub-committee on Harbour Plan Review of Harbour-front Enhancement Committee. Ninth Meeting

U T D N o r t h C a m p u s T O D and D o w n t o w n D e n t o n T O D

Newark Liberty International Airport Terminal A Redevelopment Program

Heart of the Triad A Dynamic Plan for the Future. Steering and Technical Meeting April 27, 2006

Create Policy Options Draft Plan Plan Approval. Public Consultation Events. Phase 2

KCATA Transit Oriented Development Initiatives

FRUITVALE TRANSIT VILLAGE (Phase 2) Residential Project

St. Clair Avenue West Area Transportation Master Plan

Washington Plaza at the. Lake Anne Village Center

Planning for TOD Implementation at a Corridor Scale

City Introduction & Context

01 the vision NEW LYNN IS WAITING FOR THE GREAT LEAP FORWARD

A revised Planning Justification

2010 Campus Master Plan Update - USF TAMPA Campus Master Plan Update USF TAMPA

Introduction. Community Outreach Approach. Sacramento Valley Station Master Plan. Online Questionnaire Summary of Feedback.

Status Report: MD 355 Project

NATICK COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN. Natick Center Outreach Meeting. After presentations about the Natick Master Plan process, town staff and

The University of Hong Kong s Centennial Campus: Growth and Sustainability in a City Environment

Executive Summary. NY 7 / NY 2 Corridor

Planning for TOD Implementation at a Corridor Scale

CITY OF UNION CITY MINUTES GENERAL PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE

Transit-Oriented Development

Public Consultation Summary: Lakeview Place Making Workshop January 30, 2008.

The University District envisions, in its neighborhood

ULI St. Louis Technical Assistance Panel

WHAT WE HEARD REPORT - Summary Bonnie Doon Mall Redevelopment Application (LDA )

PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE HURONTARIO-MAIN CORRIDOR SECONDARY PLAN

REPORT BACK BROADSHEET 3 May 2016

BAGBY STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT OCTOBER 2, 2015

12/9/2013. HOLLYWOOD/PINES CORRIDOR PROJECT AMPO 2013 Annual Conference October 24, Our Perspective. Broward.

SOUTHWEST TRANSITWAY (STAGE 2) PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

Jakarta, Indonesia. site area 51.9 acres / 21 hectares. total GBA 9,632,847 sq ft / 895,246 sq m. office 5,528,994 sq ft / 513,847 sq m

Transport Demand Management (TDM) Policies and Measures for Sustainable Cities

Town Centre Master Plan Sub-Committee Meeting 23/03/2017

BUENOS AIRES: THE MICROCENTRO PLAN

FROM NOTHING TO A MAJOR URBAN CENTRE IN 40 YEARS: AN INCREMENTAL APPROACH TO INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT THE CASE OF THE LOUVAIN NEW UNIVERSITY TOWN

PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD AGENDA OCTOBER

Deputation to Building & Planning Committee November 19, 2012

Green Line North Centre City Alignment

Clairtrell Area Context Plan

Knoxville Area Transit (KAT) Transit Development Plan Corridor Analysis

City of Ennis. Downtown Master Plan Catalyst Projects

UNION STUDIO Greater Kennedy Plaza!

1071 King Street West Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Courthouse Square Planning & Urban Design Study. Courthouse Square Working Group #13 October 15, 2014

Stakeholders Advisory Working Groups (SAWGs) Smart Growth and TOD Land Use (#11) SAWG Meeting

Sustainably Repositioning Greyfield Sites. Greyfield Sites Anywhere

WELCOME. Welcome to our second public exhibition on proposals for the redevelopment of the Paddington Central Management Office.

Asia Leadership Program TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD)

Launch of RMB 4.5 Billion Integrated Riverfront Eco-Neighbourhood in Tianjin Eco-City

CROSS RIVER TRAM: Linking key development, transportation and regeneration sites through the historical heart of London

(SUB)URBAN LIVINGROOM!

Transit-supportive development and city-building

Environmental Activity Nodes

WEST LOOP DESIGN GUIDELINES CHECKLIST

TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT POLICY DRAFT. City Planning and Development Department Kansas City, Missouri

Transcription:

Connecting Nine Buildings in Central Jakarta Together with the MRT Mulyadi Janto, Director, PT Farpoint Prima

SEQUIS: INTER-SITE CONNECTIVITY 30/10/17 3.45pm 5.15 pm

SEQUIS: INTER-SITE CONNECTIVITY 1. Modern Jakarta : Car City and Capsules Sites 2. Public Transportation and Infrastructure 3. Sequis Tower An Alternative Urbanism 4. Inter-Site Connectivity: Challenges and Benefits 5. Inter-Site Connectivity Design

SEQUIS: INTER-SITE CONNECTIVITY 1. Modern Jakarta : Car City and Capsules Sites 2. Public Transportation and Infrastructure 3. Sequis Tower An Alternative Urbanism 4. Inter-Site Connectivity: Challenges and Benefits 5. Inter-Site Connectivity Design

Jakarta : The capital city and most populous city in Indonesia Land area of approximately 662 km 2 in comparison to Java island of 127,569 km 2

Jakarta : The center of economics, culture and politics Population of approximately 10 million (reaching 14 million during the day) Population density of 15,174 people/km 2 (the ninth largest urban population density in the world) Nominal GDP of USD 483.8 billion in 2016 or equivalent to 17.5% of the nominal GDP of Indonesia

Jakarta : The center of economics, culture and politics GREEN AREA RESIDENTIAL AREA COMMERCIAL AREA GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL AREA WATER

Modern Jakarta : Car City and Capsules Sites 1980s How Jakarta has transformed into a modern city 1990s Now

Modern Jakarta : Car City and Capsules Sites Car City at its worst

Modern Jakarta : Car City and Capsules Sites The planning of building sites as insulated capsules with boundary walls for security. Pedestrian movement impeded as a result.

Modern Jakarta : Car City and Capsules Sites Inter-site connectivity and accessibility from building to building are missing in most Jakarta s building design. Pedestrians access are often overlooked, instead, focusing on drop off for people arriving in cars.

Modern Jakarta : Car City and Capsules Sites As a result, existing pedestrian infrastructure is re-appropriated for other uses and neglected

Modern Jakarta : Car City and Capsules Sites Lack of connectivity between different modes of public transportation No connectivity to busway stations: commuters have to get out of the station and use narrow sidewalk. Grade crossing is not safe and not pedestrian friendly. No street marking or crossing signals. 400m PEDESTRIAN COVERED PEDESTRIAN GRADE CROSSING BRIDGE CROSSING UNDERPASS CROSSING TRAIN STATION BUSWAY STATION

Modern Jakarta : Car City and Capsules Sites Pedestrian bridge or underpass crossing are placed at a random distance, and often not at the ideal location, many people need to walk quite far just to get across. 700m 550m 350m 400m 250m 650m BRIDGE CROSSING UNDERPASS CROSSING BUSWAY STATION

Modern Jakarta : Car City and Capsules Sites As a result: There isn t enough good inter-site connectivity in Jakarta between building to building and building to public transportation. Instead of walking, residents of Jakarta use cars, buses, taxis and motorcycles to travel distances as short as 200 m

SEQUIS: INTER-SITE CONNECTIVITY 1. Modern Jakarta : Car City and Capsules Sites 2. Public Transportation and Infrastructure 3. Sequis Tower An Alternative Urbanism 4. Inter-Site Connectivity: Challenges and Benefits 5. Inter-Site Connectivity Design

Jakarta : Public Transportation and Infrastructure Jakarta s Infrastructure, especially its transportation has always been the city s biggest problem (for the last two decades) Some of the many contributing factors: poor public transportation, lack of control in car and motorcycle ownership, lack of commitment from regulator (state and central government), and lack of visionary approach in urban planning

Jakarta : Public Transportation and Infrastructure Transportation condition in Jakarta: (study conducted by University of Indonesia in 2015) - Number of motorized vehicles approximately 5.5 million with only 2% public transport serving 56% of the trips - Average annual growth of motorized vehicles close to 10% for the last 5 years - Average annual growth of road length only 0.01% - Only 7% of the capital s 7,650 km of road have sidewalks - Total demand for public transport has reached 17.1 million trips/day - The total monetary lost due to traffic congestion estimated at almost USD 1 billion/year (lost of opportunity, fuel cost, health cost)

Jakarta : Public Transportation and Infrastructure Strategy and initiatives to improve Jakarta transportation: (by state and central government) 1. Public transport development a. Mass Rapid Transit / MRT b. Light Rail Transit / LRT c. Busway d. Waterways

Jakarta : Public Transportation and Infrastructure Strategy and initiatives to improve Jakarta transportation: (by state and central government) 2. Regulation / Policy a. Traffic restricted zone: Odd and even or 3 in 1 b. Electronic Road Pricing / ERP c. Parking restriction d. Parking pricing e. Promote TOD

Jakarta : Public Transportation and Infrastructure Strategy and initiatives to improve Jakarta transportation: (by state and central government) 3. Road network and facility improvement a. Road network: underpass, flyover, toll road b. Park and ride system c. Pedestrian walkway and connectivity d. Area traffic control system

Jakarta : Public Transportation and Infrastructure In a recent study by researchers at Stanford University, Indonesia, the world s 4th-mostpopulous nation, came in last among 46 countries and territories for the number of walking steps its citizens take, averaging only 3,513 a day 1 Hong Kong 6,880 steps / day 2 China 6,189 steps / day 4 Japan 6,010 steps / day 46 Indonesia 3,513 steps / day

Jakarta : Public Transportation and Infrastructure Recovering the pedestrian city: the provision of good inter-site connectivity and pedestrian walkway will encourage people to walk

SEQUIS: INTER-SITE CONNECTIVITY 1. Modern Jakarta : Car City and Capsules Sites 2. Public Transportation and Infrastructure 3. Sequis Tower An Alternative Urbanism 4. Inter-Site Connectivity: Challenges and Benefits 5. Inter-Site Connectivity Design How does private development play a role in engaging the public, and infrastructure to urban amenities How does new development play a role in changing the way we connect our cities to neighbors and transport

Sequis Tower : An Alternative Urbanism LEED Platinum Rating An international grade A office building located in SCBD (Sudirman CBD), Jakarta GFA of approx. 92,000 m2 6 Basement and 39 storey Developer: Farpoint Prima Design Architect: KPF Structure Engineer: Thornton Tomasetti MEP Engineer: Beca Landscape Architect: SWA Main Contractor: Total Bangun Persada Construction Management: Turner International

Sequis Tower boasts an engaging open plaza, combining elegant and inviting venues for lifestyle dining both indoor and outdoor, conference facilities and fitness centers. Retail shops and restaurants in the podium

Sequis Tower : An Alternative Urbanism An initiative to connect Sequis Tower with the nine neighboring buildings and to MRT 1 10 9 2 3 4 6 5 8 7 1 and 2: Stock Exchange 3 and 4: Mandiri Tower 5: Sequis Center 6: Sequis Tower (UC) 7: Niaga Tower 8: Energy Tower 9: Alila Hotel (UC) 10: Pacific Place Mall MRT Connection

Sequis Tower : An Alternative Urbanism Sequis Tower

Sequis Tower : An Alternative Urbanism By connecting to the Istora MRT station, the inter-site connectivity can be expanded to the north creating connection to GBK (the national stadium) and Senayan complex (major retail and commercial area)

Sequis Tower : An Alternative Urbanism

SEQUIS: INTER-SITE CONNECTIVITY 1. Modern Jakarta : Car City and Capsules Sites 2. Public Transportation and Infrastructure 3. Sequis Tower An Alternative Urbanism 4. Inter-Site Connectivity: Challenges and Benefits 5. Inter-Site Connectivity Design

Inter-Site Connectivity: Challenges There are challenges faced in the development of the inter-site connectivity, such as: 1. Agreement with the neighbors and the estate 2. Security coordination with the neighbors and the estate 3. Technical constraints related to boundary conditions between existing buildings: elevation, access, etc 4. Support from the city government on infrastructure improvement 5. Building permit issues on the upgrading works: building coverage, green coverage, etc 6. Well-planned construction activities with in-operation buildings

Inter-Site Connectivity 1 and 2: Stock Exchange 7 8 5 6 3 4 2 1 10 3 and 4: Mandiri Tower 5 and 6: Sequis Center and Sequis Tower (UC) 7: Niaga Tower 8: Energy Tower 9: Alila Hotel (UC) 10: Pacific Place Mall MRT Connection 9

Inter-Site Connectivity: Challenges There are some challenges faced in the development of the inter-site connectivity, such as: 1. Agreement with the neighbors and the estate 2. Security coordination with the neighbors and the estate 3. Technical constraints related to boundary conditions between existing buildings: elevation, access, etc 4. Support from the city government on infrastructure improvement 5. Building permit issues on the upgrading works: building coverage, green coverage, etc 6. Well-planned construction activities with in-operation buildings

Inter-Site Connectivity Security coordination Security check

Inter-Site Connectivity: Challenges There are some challenges faced in the development of the inter-site connectivity, such as: 1. Agreement with the neighbors and the estate 2. Security coordination with the neighbors and the estate 3. Technical constraints related to boundary conditions between existing buildings: elevation, access, etc 4. Support from the city government on infrastructure improvement 5. Building permit issues on the upgrading works: building coverage, green coverage, etc 6. Well-planned construction activities with in-operation buildings

Inter-Site Connectivity Technical constraints

Inter-Site Connectivity Technical constraints

Inter-Site Connectivity Section

Inter-Site Connectivity: Challenges There are challenges faced in the development of the inter-site connectivity, such as: 1. Agreement with the neighbors and the estate 2. Security coordination with the neighbors and the estate 3. Technical constraints related to boundary conditions between existing buildings: elevation, access, etc 4. Support from the city government on infrastructure improvement 5. Building permit issues on the upgrading works: building coverage, green coverage, etc 6. Well-planned construction activities with in-operation buildings

Inter-Site Connectivity: Benefits We believe there will be many benefits from the development of the inter-site connectivity when well planned, such as: 1. Shared amenities between buildings: parking, F&B retail, auditorium, gym, multi purpose hall, medical center, etc. 2. Reduce traffic congestion within SCBD 3. Reduce air pollution from motorized vehicles 4. Promote walking culture and healthier lifestyle 5. Increase value of the buildings 6. Transform the space between buildings into positive urban places

SEQUIS: INTER-SITE CONNECTIVITY 1. Modern Jakarta : Car City and Capsules Sites 2. Public Transportation and Infrastructure 3. Sequis Tower An Alternative Urbanism 4. Inter-Site Connectivity: Challenges and Benefits 5. Inter-Site Connectivity Design

The Elements in Inter-Site Connectivity Circulation PAVED PATH PAVED PATH COVERED PATH COVERED PATH

The Elements in Inter-Site Connectivity Places OUTDOOR ROOMS / GARDEN OUTDOOR ROOMS GARDEN RETAIL / ART RETAIL / ART

The Forest

The Forest PATH OUTDOOR ROOM

The Forest

The Forest

Inter-Site Connectivity Zones View from Sudirman View from SCBD

Inter-Site Connectivity Zone A

Inter-Site Connectivity Zone A

Inter-Site Connectivity Zone A

Inter-Site Connectivity Zone A

Inter-Site Connectivity Zone A

Inter-Site Connectivity Zone B GARDEN 12.00 OUTDOOR ROOM 11.60 PATH

Inter-Site Connectivity Zone B

Inter-Site Connectivity Zone B

Inter-Site Connectivity Zone B

Inter-Site Connectivity Zone C 14.40 10.5 0 11.0 0 10.50 GREEN WALL WATER FEATURE CANOPY

Inter-Site Connectivity Zone C

Inter-Site Connectivity Zone C

Inter-Site Connectivity Zone D 10.40 KIOSK / ART 14.50 OPEN PLAZA GRAND WATER FEATURE

Inter-Site Connectivity Zone E 13.20 13.20 12.10 13.10 SUBWAY ENTRY / URBAN LINK PATH + COVERED CONNECTING STAIR/ RAMP + PLAZA

Inter-Site Connectivity Zone E

Inter-Site Connectivity Zone E

The Take Outs How does private development play a role in engaging the public, and infrastructure to urban amenities How does new development play a role in changing the way we connect our cities to neighbors and transport

Thank you