Effect of Alternative Control Products on the Reduction of Dandelion in Turf J.B. Ross and M.A. Anderson

Similar documents
Evaluation of Fiesta and liquid corn gluten meal for pre-emergent control of turfgrass weeds greenhouse and bare soil trial.

02/24/15 Page 2 of 16

EVALUATION OF NATURAL SELECTIVE POST-EMERGENT HERBICIDE PRODUCTS ON GROWTH AND SURVIVAL OF WEEDS AND TURFGRASS.

Evaluation of Alternative Grasses for Turfgrass Use J.B. Ross and M.A. Anderson

Wear Tolerant Grasses for Use on Sports Fields in a Cold Climate M.A. Anderson and J.B. Ross

Corn Rootworm Control in Field Corn with planting time treatments. Soil Insecticide Test # 3, 2005

Wear Tolerant Grasses for Use on Sports Fields in a Cold Climate M.A. Anderson and J.B. Ross

The Impact of Post Application Irrigation on Dollar Spot, Brown Patch and Algae Control with Renown Fungicide, 2008

Evaluation of Kentucky Bluegrass Cultivars J.B. Ross and M.A. Anderson

Organic Weed Control Products for Use in Lawns and Gardens. Tim Miller WSU NWREC

HealthyGro Fertilizer Trials

2006 CORN ROOTWORM EFFICACY TRIAL YIELDGARD ROOTWORM COMPARISON TO SOIL INSECTICIDES AND SEED TREATMENTS 1. Final Report

95.4 ab 95.7 a 11.5 c 50 b 100 a 9.5 c 95 a 99.8 a 95.4 de. 0 c 97.8 a 68.4 ab 0 c 33.3 bc 33.3 bc 0 b 91.6 a 93.9 e

Weeds in Ornamental Plantings:

Effect of Soil Amendment with Dry and Wet Distillers Grains on Growth of Canola and Soil Properties

EVOLUTION. Systemic Disease Protection, Year Round. Simply. Grow. Together.

Wear Tolerant Grasses for Use on Sports Fields in a Cold Climate D.K. Tompkins, M.A. Anderson and J.B. Ross

Pesticide-Free Lawn Care

Evaluation of Kentucky Bluegrass and Fine Leaf Fescue Cultivars J.B.Ross and M.A. Anderson

2016 Dormant Stem Brush Control Trial

Weed Control in Green Peas. Tim Miller and Carl Libbey, WSU Mount Vernon

Use of Turf Covers for Improved Overseeding Establishment on Hybrid Bermudagrass Greens

Vegetable Report 1 from Experiment Station, HARC December 1998

Managing Pesky Weeds in Lawns

Potassium Applications and Yellow Shoulder Disorder of Tomatoes in High Tunnels

Developing integrated control tactics for cole crop pests. Final report, 13 February 2008

MSU Research Update. Irrie:ation Study on Kentuckv Bluee:rass

Sandy, low CEC, irrigated soil Acidic ph High ph Cold soils Soil low in P content or available P

Evaluating Suitable Tomato Cultivars for Early Season High Tunnel Production in the Central Great Plains

Controlled Release Container Nursery Fertilizer Evaluations. Dr. James T. Midcap

University of GA Coop Ext Service Postemergence Broadleaf Weed Control with Penoxsulam in Bermudagrass.

Hawaii Agriculture Research Center -1- Vegetable Report 2. Hawaii Agriculture Research Center Vegetable Report 2 January 2000

New Arkansas Blackberry Production Characteristics

2017 Sweet Potato Slip Production Research Update

THE EFFECTS OF MINITUBER SIZE AND HARVEST DATE ON GERMINATION, TUBER SET, AND YIELD OF RUSSET BURBANK POTATOES. Steven R. James '

Reap The Business of Success

2001 CORN ROOTWORM SOIL INSECTICIDE EVALUATIONS AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER MEAD, NEBRASKA

Know Your Weeds. How to Control Undesirable Plants (i.e. Weeds) OLLI May 2, 2013

High Tunnel Primocane Fruiting Blackberry Production in Cold Region of Midwest*

2000 CORN ROOTWORM SOIL INSECTICIDE EVALUATIONS AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER MEAD, NEBRASKA

TRANSPLANTING METHODS FOR THE CULTIVATION OF CORN LILY (VERATRUM CALIFORNICUM)

Plant Growth Hormone Technology

LAWN RENOVATION & OVERSEEDING

Evaluating Plant Growth Regulators for Growth Control of Herbaceous Perennials

Weed Management in Sugar Beets: 2008 Research Results. Prepared for the. Ontario Sugar Beet Growers Association

When evaluating a potting mix for tomato transplant production, consider the following properties:

California Pepper Commission Final Report, Title: Preemergence Weed Control Trials in Peppers

Lettuce with Vitazyme application Vitazyme Field Tests for 2018

Soybean plant health: Foliar fungicide and insecticide effects on soybean disease suppression, senescence and yield I.

Strawberry Weed Management and Herbicide Update. Tim Miller WSU Mount Vernon, NWREC

Crown Responses to Fertilization in Juvenile Western Redcedar and Western Hemlock. R.W. Negrave Research Silviculturist BC Forest Service

Fungicide Efficacy and Spore Dispersal of Cercosporidium Needle Blight on Leyland Cypress

LAWN MAKEOVER WORKBOOK APPENDICES. What Works, What Doesn t To Help Residents Achieve Beautiful, Eco-Friendly Lawns

2007 Herculex Corn Rootworm Soil Insecticide / Seed Treatment Efficacy Experiment. 1. Data Summary

Virginia Tech VIRGINIA POLYTEHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY

Timing Kerb Applications in Lettuce

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Research Report Cover Sheet

Biofertilizers. Discover

Phytotoxicity and Efficacy of Cycocel (Chlormequat Chloride) for Growth Control of Sweet Potato Vine (Ipomoea batatas Tricolor )

CARE MANUAL JIM MELKA LANDSCAPING & GARDEN CENTER

Rosemary Collier and Andrew Jukes

Effects of Phosphorus and Calcium on Tuber Set, Yield, and Quality in Goldrush Potato

Chapter 2. Vegetation Control Options for Rights-of-Way Managers Table of Contents

Effect of Max-In Technology on Roundup Power Max Performance on Sugarbeet and Weeds at Mitchell, Nebraska during the 2009 Growing Season.

East Malling Rootstock Club Policy Group meeting 15th September 2017

(F) (%) (mph) (inches) May Calm 8:30 AM 2 true leaves

Chemical Blossom Thinning of Peaches and Nectarines 1997 CTFA Report

_Bonide Maize Weed Preventer Ready to Spray_ _240_4_.pdf. Ready to Spray

Fall Broccoli Cultivar Trial

The Best DMI in Town. Always read and follow label directions. Untreated

WOODY AND TURF MANAGEMENT Lesson 14: FERTILIZERS

Pumpkin Cultivar Performance Trial Grown in Southern Ohio 2018

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program PGR Effect on Shelf Life of Herbaceous Ornamental Crops

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Trial Report

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program PGR Effect on Shelf Life of Herbaceous Ornamentals. Authors: Ely Vea and Cristi Palmer Date: May 29, 2009

Imperial County Agricultural Briefs

EFFECT OF TUBER PLACEMENT ON YELLOW NUTSEDGE REPRODUCTION

Golf Session 1Papers MATERIALS AND METHODS

Diversified Crops Report 17

EVALUATION OF LAMBDA STAR IN THE CONTROL OF APHIDS ON KALE.

EVALUATION OF SMARTSTAX TRAITED AND REFUGE CORN HYBRIDS IN COMBINATION WITH SOIL INSECTICIDES AT PLANTING FOR LARVAL CORN

COVER SHEET. AUTHOR S NAME: Daniel Lloyd. MAJOR: Soil Science Agricultural Systems Production. DEPARTMENT: Soil Science. MENTOR: Doug Soldat

Evaluation of Carfentrazone-ethyl+Metsulfuron-methyl against Broadleaf Weeds of Wheat

Northern Willowherb Control in Nursery Containers. James Altland

EFFECTS OF TANK MIXES OF ROUNDUP WITH FUNGICIDES AND INSECTICIDES ON ROUNDUP READY SOYBEANS

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Research Report Form

Micro propagation of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) through auxiliary buds

Killing Trees & Brush in Your Fence Lines. NW FL Beef Conference Mark Mauldin UF/IFAS Extension Washington County February 2019

MANAGEMENT OF MIXED ANNUAL BLUEGRASS / CREEPING BENTGRASS FAIRWAYS

Project Report ROOT GROWTH DURING SOD TRANSPLANTING. Bingru Huang, Associate professor

THE EFFECTS OF HUMATE AND ORGANIC FERTILIZER ON ESTABLISHMENT AND NUTRITION OF CREEPING BENT PUTTING GREENS

TerraMax Turf Sales Guide 2013

Unsurpassed Technology Real field data. Real results. Real restoration.

SUCCESS WITH ORGANIC SUBSTRATES. by Neil Mattson and Stephanie Beeks Cornell University

FACTORS AFFECTING JAPANESE BEETLE GRUB CONTROL WITH OFTANOL* AND TRIUMPH* Patricia J. Vittum University of Massachusetts, Waltham, MA

Broadleaf Weed & Brush Control in Cool Season Grass Forages

Why Azospirillum? Azospirillum is a naturally occurring soil bacteria that stimulates root development.

PRODUCT LIST. Espoma Tones For Organic Gardening FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Compostability of Restaurant Kitchen Waste Using Effective Microorganisms Preparations

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Trial Report

Transcription:

Effect of Alternative Control Products on the Reduction of Dandelion in Turf J.B. Ross and M.A. Anderson Summary A number of alternative weed control products were tested at three sites throughout western Canada. Two applications of each of the products were applied in July and August, 2011. Killex 500 was the only product that gave consistent control of dandelion. At the Lethbridge site the Fiesta appeared to provide good control three weeks after the second application of product. Label recommendations state that two or more applications of this product may be necessary to achieve weed control. The non-selective herbicides and the compost did not reduce dandelion counts in these trials. Background Information Table 1 Information on active ingredients and mode of action of the various products in this trial. Product Active Ingredient Mode of Action Killex 500 A selective herbicide Fiesta A selective Finalsan A non-selective 2,4-D mecoprop dicamba Iron Chelate with hydroxyethylenediaminetriacetic acid in the form FEHEDTA Pelargonic acid also known as nonanoic acid. A conventional three-way phenoxy herbicide. The herbicide mimics the natural growth hormones, and upset the plants natural hormone balance. New growth on broadleaf plants generally exhibit stem twisting and leaf malformations. Causes oxidative stress within the plant at the cellular level that in turn causes tissue necrosis and ultimately plant death. Penetrates the wax layer of the leaf destroying the plants epidermis cell membranes, causing in a rapid dissolution of cell membrane integrity resulting in the dessication of foliar tissues EcoClear A non-selective Pelletized Compost Corn Gluten Meal A pre-emergent herbicide A proprietary mixture of acetic and citric acids Decomposed organic matter Gluten is a composite formed from several different proteins: albumins, glutelins, globulins, and prolamins. Penetrates the wax layer of the leaf destroying the plants epidermis cell membranes, causing in a rapid dissolution of cell membrane integrity resulting in the dessication of foliar tissues. Compost is generally considered an amendment that improves the physical properties of the soil. However it can smother weeds when used as a mulch. Inhibits root formation in weeds at the time of germination. Weeds germinate and form a shoot, but no root, which prevents growth. Has been shown to be ineffective on established weeds. Untreated Control None No treatment was applied.

Materials and Methods Field trials were established in selected parks areas that had a high natural infestation of dandelion in Regina, Red Deer and Lethbridge. Plots that were 1.0 by 1.0 metres were established in a randomized complete block design with four replications. The Regina trial was initiated on July 14 th followed by similar trials being established in Lethbridge on July 28 th and in Red Deer on August 3 rd. A second application of the following product: Fiesta, Finalsan, Ecoclear and corn gluten meal was applied to each plot five weeks after the initial treatment. The number of dandelion plants within each individual plot was determined prior to the first application of the treatments. The liquid formulated treatments Killex 500 and Fiesta were premixed and applied at the required rates using a CO 2 research sprayer. The Finalsan spot treatment also required the preparation of a spray solution consisting 1 part Finalsan to 6 parts water. Using a spray bottle the prepared spray solution was applied to the dandelion foliage to assure that the leaf area was thoroughly wet. The other spot treatment, EcoClear, was already formulated as a ready to use spray. Again sufficient amount of the spray solution was applied to the dandelion foliage to assure that the leaf area was thoroughly wet. The two remaining dry formulated treatments, the pelletized compost and the granular corn gluten meal, were pre-weighed and hand shaken on to the designated plots. Five weeks after the initial application of the treatments, the level of dandelion control was evaluated at the Red Deer and Lethbridge sites. The number of dandelion plants within each individual plot were counted and evaluated for signs of control. The Red Deer and Lethbridge sites were evaluated one more time at eight weeks after the initial application of the treatments. The number of dandelion plants within each individual plot were once more counted and evaluated for signs of control. The Regina site was evaluated only once at eleven weeks after the initial application of the treatments. The number of dandelion plants within each individual plot were counted and evaluated for signs of control. Table 2 List of treatments and application rates 1. Killex 500 single application at 40mls /100m 2 2. Fiesta 1:25 mix applied at 100mls/m 2 3. Fiesta 1:25 mix applied at 200mls/m 2 4. Fiesta 1:25 mix applied at 400mls/m 2 5. Fiesta 1:25 mix applied at 50mls/m 2 6. Fiesta 1:12 mix applied at 100mls/m 2 7. Fiesta 1:12 mix applied at 200mls/m 2 8. Finalsan 1:6 mix spot treatment 9. Finalsan 1:6 mix spot treatment + Corn gluten meal 100g/m 2 10. EcoClear spot treatment 11. EcoClear spot treatment + Corn gluten 100g/m 2 12. Pelletized Compost single application at 100g/m 2 13. Pelletized Compost single application at 200g/m 2

14. Corn gluten meal 100g/m 2 15. Untreated Control Results On both rating dates at the Red Deer site, the industry standard product, Killex 500, was significantly better than any of the other products in the test. However, it was interesting to note that on the second rating date there was a recovery in the number of dandelions in the Killex treated areas. On the first rating date (five weeks after application), Fiesta 1:25 100ml/100m 2 and EcoClear spot treatment had significantly less dandelions than the untreated control. However, eight weeks after the initial treatment (3 weeks after the second treatment) there were no differences between these treatments and the untreated control. On the second rating date Fiesta 1:25 50mls/m 2, Fiesta 1:25 200mls/m 2 and EcoClear spot treatment plus Corn gluten 100g/m 2 had significantly lower dandelion counts than did the untreated control. However, on the first rating date there were no statistical differences. Table 3 - Red Deer dandelion counts, 2011. Treatments Initial count 5 weeks 8 weeks plants/m 2 Killex 500 single application at 40mls /100m 2 30a 4c 12e Fiesta 1:25 mix applied at 100mls/m 2 30a 21b 29ab Fiesta 1:25 mix applied at 200mls/m 2 30a 26ab 24bcd Fiesta 1:25 mix applied at 400mls/m 2 30a 27ab 25abcd Fiesta 1:25 mix applied at 50mls/m 2 30a 25ab 21d Fiesta 1:12 mix applied at 100mls/m 2 30a 25ab 26abcd Fiesta 1:12 mix applied at 200mls/m 2 30a 23ab 28abc Finalsan 1:6 mix spot treatment 30a 30a 27abcd Finalsan 1:6 mix spot treatment + Corn gluten 100g/m 2 30a 28ab 30a EcoClear spot treatment 30a 21b 27abcd EcoClear spot treatment + Corn gluten 100g/m 2 30a 23ab 22cd Pelletized Compost single application at 100g/m 2 30a 25ab 30a Pelletized Compost single application at 200g/m 2 30a 30a 30a Corn gluten 100g/m 2 30a 25ab 30a Untreated Control 30a 30a 30a LSD 0.05 = n/s 7 5 * Numeric values followed by the same letter are not considered significantly different. At the Lethbridge site, Fiesta 1:12 100ml/m 2 had significantly lower dandelion counts than did the untreated control on both rating dates. On the second rating date, Killex 500 40mls /100m 2, Fiesta 1:25 200mls/m 2, Fiesta 1:25 400mls/m 2, Fiesta 1:25 50mls/m 2, Fiesta 1:12 100mls/m 2, and Fiesta 1:12 200mls/m 2 had lower dandelions counts than did the untreated control.

Table 4 - Lethbridge dandelion counts, 2011. Treatments Initial count 5 weeks 8 weeks plants/m 2 Killex 500 single application at 40mls /100m 2 24a 15cd 8de Fiesta 1:25 mix applied at 100mls/m 2 30a 27ab 14bcde Fiesta 1:25 mix applied at 200mls/m 2 29a 18bcd 4de Fiesta 1:25 mix applied at 400mls/m 2 30a 24abc 5de Fiesta 1:25 mix applied at 50mls/m 2 29a 18bcd 6de Fiesta 1:12 mix applied at 100mls/m 2 22a 11d 8de Fiesta 1:12 mix applied at 200mls/m 2 26a 20abcd 3e Finalsan 1:6 mix spot treatment 25a 26abc 11cde Finalsan 1:6 mix spot treatment + Corn gluten 100g/m 2 27a 27ab 14bcde EcoClear spot treatment 27a 30a 16abcd EcoClear spot treatment + Corn gluten 100g/m 2 24a 21abcd 11bcde Pelletized Compost single application at 100g/m 2 28a 28ab 28a Pelletized Compost single application at 200g/m 2 29a 27ab 21abc Corn gluten 100g/m 2 30a 30a 24ab Untreated Control 23a 23abc 24ab LSD 0.05 = n/s 10 13 * Numeric values followed by the same letter are not considered significantly different. There were no significant differences between treatments at the Regina site. Table 5 - Regina dandelion counts, 2011. Treatments Initial count 11 weeks plants/m 2 Killex 500 single application at 40mls /100m 2 21a 12a Fiesta 1:25 mix applied at 100mls/m 2 14a 15a Fiesta 1:25 mix applied at 200mls/m 2 21a 14a Fiesta 1:25 mix applied at 400mls/m 2 12a 16a Fiesta 1:25 mix applied at 50mls/m 2 18a 18a Fiesta 1:12 mix applied at 100mls/m 2 9a 7a Fiesta 1:12 mix applied at 200mls/m 2 18a 17a Finalsan 1:6 mix spot treatment 17a 25a Finalsan 1:6 mix spot treatment + Corn gluten 100g/m 2 17a 17a EcoClear spot treatment 19a 22a EcoClear spot treatment + Corn gluten 100g/m 2 12a 15a Pelletized Compost single application at 100g/m 2 16a 16a Pelletized Compost single application at 200g/m 2 15a 22a Corn gluten 100g/m 2 20a 26a Untreated Control 16a 24a LSD 0.05 = n/s n/s

* Numeric values followed by the same letter are not considered significantly different.