Sharon Village Block Plan

Sharon Village Block Plan February, 2010 SHARON Malone Given Parsons Ltd. NAK Design Group MMM Group

[This page intentionally left blank]

Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction 1-1 1.1 Overview 1-1 1.2 Community Context 1-3 1.3 Block Plan Participation 1-7 1.4 Town of East Gwillimbury Policy Context 1-7 1.5 Region of York Official Plan 1-12 1.6 Provincial Policy Initiatives 1-12 2.0 Environmental Framework 2-15 2.1 Watercourses 2-17 2.2 Valleys 2-19 2.3 Wetlands 2-21 2.4 Trees and Woodlots 2-23 3.0 The Block Plan 3-27 3.1 A Sustainable Community 3-27 3.2 Land Use Concept 3-31 3.3 A Complete Community 3-35 3.4 Neighbourhood Structure 3-39 4.0 Servicing 4-57 4.1 Urban Services 4-57 4.2 Water Supply 4-57 4.3 Sanitary Servicing 4-57 4.4 Stormwater Management 4-61 4.5 Phasing and Staging 4-63 5.0 Traffic and Transit 5-65 5.1 Road Plan 5-65 5.2 Hierarchy and Function of Streets 5-65 5.2.1 Transit 5-71 5.3 Transportation Demand Management 5-71 6.0 Conclusion 6-73 SHARON TABLE OF CONTENTS Malone Given Parsons Ltd. NAK Design Group MMM Group Page i

SHARON TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ii [This page intentionally left blank]

1.0 Introduction 1.1 Overview In June 2004, the Town of East Gwillimbury adopted Official Plan Amendment (OPA) #122, which amended the policies of, and expanded the Community Plan area for Sharon. OPA #122 was modified and amended by the Region of York in February 2005 and came into full force and effect on November 25, 2005. In 2005 the landowners in the greenfield areas of the Sharon Community Plan commissioned a team of consultants to prepare and submit a Block Plan to coordinate the delivery of the Master Environmental Servicing Plan and Environmental Impact Statement (MESP/EIS). The landowners elected to plan for growth through a Block Plan format in order to comprehensively address the environmental, servicing, transportation, heritage, acoustic, archaeological and land use issues related to new growth in this unique community. The MESP/EIS documents were submitted in the Spring of 2007 for municipal review, which have since been revised, as represented in this Block Plan. The Block Plan and supporting studies provide for the orderly, logical, costeffective, sensitive and sustainable growth in Sharon. Draft Plans of Subdivision will implement this plan through the development process. The Community Vision is well defined in the Sharon Community Plan, providing for the preservation of the unique historical and architectural features of Sharon, while supporting the sustainable growth of greenfield areas to ensure the longterm vibrancy of this village. The Block Plan works within, and builds upon this vision to round out this community. The Block Plan anticipates that the community will build-out as an integrated whole by maintaining and enhancing the natural and cultural heritage core of the community, and contributing to the village main street appeal of Leslie Street. The majority of growth in Sharon will occur on full municipal sanitary sewer services to be installed along a new North- South Collector road, west of Leslie Street. Sharon Village will be a community with valued natural and cultural heritage. Nine new neighbourhoods are defined primarily by the protected Natural Heritage System, where the provision of parks and parkettes, trailheads, stormwater management facilities, and pedestrian and cycling access points will provide residents with visibility and access to their natural environment. The Block Plan identifies the watercourses, valleys, wetlands and woodlots that comprise the natural heritage system, all of which have associated buffers and development setbacks to ensure that the community develops in an environmentally sustainable manner. The interplay between existing and new neighbourhoods relies on the social and cultural binding potential of the Civic Centre district, which is comprised of the Town municipal buildings, future park and community facilities and the Sharon Temple. This focal point of community identity and activity will provide a central place for residents to meet, work, play and shop, and will be the bridge between the west and east sides of Leslie Street. Together, residents have the potential to interact in both natural and cultural settings. SHARON SECTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Community Vision is well defined in the Sharon Community Plan, providing for the preservation of the unique historical and architectural features of Sharon, while supporting the sustainable growth of greenfield areas to ensure the long-term vibrancy of this village. Malone Given Parsons Ltd. NAK Design Group MMM Group Page 1-1

SHARON SECTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION Figure 1.1: Community Context - Town of East Gwillimbury Community Areas Page 1-2

The new neighbourhoods in Sharon Village will provide investment in community infrastructure that will benefit the entire community, including new schools and parks. A new civic centre square, in concert with a mixed use area, will shape Leslie Street as an active and lively streetscape that facilitates the continued use and preservation of buildings in the historic district. The Block Plan will provide for compatible new development adjacent to the historic district to encourage the regeneration and appreciation of the heritage core of the community. Responding to the direction of the Community Plan, the majority of lands in the Block Plan are designated for low density residential development. Each neighbourhood has been planned to be pedestrian-scaled, attractive and vibrant and will offer a variety of options for recreation and housing. The location and size of medium density residential areas are designed to minimize disturbance on natural features and to work within topographic constraints. It is anticipated that the medium density areas will develop with street townhouses and low-rise apartments that will be transit supportive along the North-South Collector road and Leslie Street. The road system in the community is designed to ensure efficient access for residents, while limiting through-traffic infiltration into residential areas, particularly from the North- South collector road. This will ensure the creation of closeknit streetscapes, rather than automobile orientated street patterns. Complimenting the road system, a pedestrian trail system will provide access and enjoyment of the Natural Heritage System and connections to community facilities, transit locations and adjoining neighbourhoods. 1.2 Community Context The Village of Sharon is located in the southern part of the Town of East Gwillimbury, on the northern edge of the Greater Toronto Area in the Region of York. Figure 1.1 illustrates the village of Sharon in the larger context of the Town and adjacent municipalities. Within the last decade, York Region has experienced one of the highest rates of growth in Canada. The Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe continues to recognize York Region s desirability as a place to live and work and has allocated some of the highest levels of growth to York amongst all regions in the Greater Golden Horseshoe. The Growth Plan compliments the Provincial Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation, Greenbelt and Lake Simcoe Protection Plans that have had the cumulative effect of protecting millions of hectares of land for the long-term environmental and agricultural needs of the Greater Golden Horseshoe Area by directing the majority of growth forecasted to the year 2031 to existing communities. In this context, the challenge for municipalities will be to create complete communities and intensify built-up residential areas while maintaining and enhancing established community identities. The Town of East Gwillimbury has adopted a Strategic Plan that, in conjunction with the Town s Official Plan and Sharon Community Plan, provides a framework for preserving what is valued in the community while providing for future growth. The Town is primarily a rural area with a strong agricultural base and a wealth of environmental features. Within the Town there are five distinct community areas planned for growth: Sharon, Mount Albert, Holland Landing, Queensville, and Green Lane West. SHARON SECTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION The challenge for municipalities will be to create complete communities and intensify built-up residential areas while maintaining and enhancing established community identities. Malone Given Parsons Ltd. NAK Design Group MMM Group Page 1-3

SHARON SECTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION Figure 1.2: Current Planned Structure of Holland Landing, Queensville and Sharon Page 1-4

Most of these communities evolved as service and cultural centres for the surrounding rural area, with religious, commercial and educational uses located along the original pioneer road system. Growth in these communities has occurred on large, unserviced estate style lots and is generally comprised of small-scale, low-density residential developments that have a unique and close-knit character. The policies of the Official and Strategic Plans emphasize the protection of rural, agricultural, and environmental areas while providing for the creation of well-planned and complete communities through the long-term build-out of developable areas. SHARON SECTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION Most of these communities evolved as service and cultural centres for the surrounding rural area, with religious, commercial and educational uses located along the original pioneer road system. The undulating topography of new areas of Sharon Malone Given Parsons Ltd. NAK Design Group MMM Group Page 1-5

SHARON SECTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION Figure 1.3: Property Ownership Page 1-6

1.3 Block Plan Participation Figure 1.3 illustrates the holdings of the Participating, and Non-Participating Landowners. The Participating Landowners are the proponents for the Block Plan and represent 70% of the lands designated for development. Non-Participating Landowners have been contacted during the block planning process and provided the opportunity to comment on the Block Plan. The Block Plan has been prepared for the entire block to establish a comprehensive framework for the optimal development of all lands. 1.4 Town of East Gwillimbury Policy Context Town of East Gwillimbury Strategic Plan In an effort to provide a new direction for the municipality in the face of growth pressures, Town Council approved a Strategic Plan in November 2005. This document laid the groundwork for the Town s future as a sustainable community. The principles set out in this document will inform and shape the policies that will be refined in the Town s Official Plan review. The Strategic Plan is based on the following Five Strategic Pillars: SHARON SECTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION The rural landscape of East Gwillimbury Protecting and Enhancing the Environment; Providing and Advocating for Quality Programs and Services to the Community; Investing in Municipal Infrastructure; Managing Growth to Ensure a Sustainable Community; Supporting Municipal Organization Focused on Excellence. The Block Plan is a proactive response to the Town s sustainable vision, and supports and implements the Community Vision and direction of the Strategic Plan. Town of East Gwillimbury Official Plan The Town s Official Plan was adopted in July 1997 and consolidated in September 2006. The Plan s policies direct that Community Area Plans take precedence in planning for community areas of the Town. The Village of Sharon is identified as a community area in the Town, for which the policies of the Sharon Community Plan (OPA #122) take precedence over the policies of the Town s Official Plan. Accordingly, the Block Plan has been designed to generally conform to the policies and designations of the Sharon Community Plan. Five Strategic Pillars: Protect and enhance the environment Provide and advocate quality programs and services Invest in Municipal infrastructure Manage growth to ensure a sustainable community Support Municipal organization focused on excellence Malone Given Parsons Ltd. NAK Design Group MMM Group Page 1-7

SHARON SECTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION Figure 1.4: Sharon Community Plan (February 2005) Page 1-8

Sharon Community Plan A Community Plan for Sharon has been in existence since 1976. Subsequent consolidations and amendments have updated the Plan with current planning issues and expanded visions for the community. The most recent update to the Sharon Community Plan (OPA #122) was adopted by Town Council in June 2004 and approved by the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) in late Fall 2005. It established policies with respect to development, natural heritage protection, architectural heritage, land use, servicing, stormwater management and transportation to guide the growth of Sharon. Figure 1.4 indicates land use designations established by the Sharon Community Plan, including those for the Block Plan lands generally west of Leslie Street. The Sharon Community Plan anticipated an approximate total population of 9,200 residents in the planning horizon of 2026. It identifies the existing community (developed on private sewage services) with an estimated population of 3,400 in 1996. The 2006 Census Population and Dwelling Counts recorded a population of Sharon at 2,778 people. Applying an undercount of 3.96% (2001 undercount), it is estimated 2,888 people resided in Sharon as of 2006. In August 2009, Town Council adopted policy amendments to implement the Block Plan. The population forecast for Sharon was adjusted to reflect the future extension of the York-Durham Sanitary Sewer into portions of the community and to account for the potential for intensification to respond to the direction of the Provincial Policy Statement (2005) and the Places to Grow Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe. These adjustments resulted in an estimated population forecast of 12,100 people for Sharon to 2031. The Block Plan has been designed to realize the Sharon Community Vision Statement and achieve the four Community Development Principles that form the basis of the Sharon Community Plan. The Vision Statement for Sharon, as defined in the Sharon Community Plan as follows: SHARON: A COMMUNITY WITH A UNIQUE HERITAGE TRADITION The Community of Sharon is a close knit community with a unique heritage tradition, a small town atmosphere and strong links to the surrounding rural / environmental areas. Sharon will: (i) maintain and enhance its heritage tradition; (ii) strengthen the existing linkages with rural / environmental areas through the creation of a linked open space system; (iii) build on its heritage tradition and linked open space system to create a well-designed community; (iv) enhance community facilities and support community organizations which contribute to ensuring the close knit, small town nature of the community; and (v) strive to be a sustainable, safe, diverse, compact and transit-supportive community. The four Community Development Principles are: 1. Unique heritage character; 2. Strong open space system; 3. Healthy community; and 4. Financial Feasibility. SHARON SECTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Sharon Community Plan establishes policies with respect to development, natural heritage protection, architectural heritage, land use, servicing, stormwater management and transportation to guide the growth of Sharon. Malone Given Parsons Ltd. NAK Design Group MMM Group Page 1-9

SHARON SECTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION #1 UNIQUE HERITAGE CHARACTER Principle: The unique heritage character of Sharon should be actively maintained and enhanced. This principle is intended to ensure that the Community s unique heritage character is not only maintained, but enhanced. All development should be sympathetic to the heritage environment. Supporting Objectives: (i) To encourage a community form, and design at all levels of development, which is sympathetic to and respectful of the heritage of the community; (ii) To protect the heritage of the community through the preservation and enhancement of heritage buildings and sites, streetscapes and other related features; and, (iii) To explore opportunities for low key development which builds on the heritage character of the Community including the creation of a Temple precinct as a historical and cultural focus for Sharon. #2 STRONG OPEN SPACE SYSTEM Principle: A strong open space system should be an integral part of the Community. This principle is intended to ensure the protection of natural features and the strengthening of linkages with the surrounding rural / environmental areas, as well as to ensure development is environmentally sustainable. Supporting Objectives: (i) To maintain and enhance the natural systems in the Community of Sharon. (ii) To create a linked open space system as an integral part of the Community. Sharon Temple Page 1-10

#3 HEALTHY COMMUNITY Principle: Decisions made with respect to the future of Sharon will reflect the need to establish a healthy community which achieves high standards of design. Supporting Objectives: (i) To encourage a community form, and design at all levels of development, which provides opportunities for communication between residents, and, in particular, allows for pedestrian / bicycle access throughout the community. (ii) To enhance the existing main street area along Leslie Street as a central meeting place for the community and adjacent rural areas. (iii) To provide within the context of the community a range of recreational, educational, cultural and commercial facilities and activities to meet the needs of residents. (iv) To build and maintain the physical services required to ensure the health, safety and well-being of the community. (v) To ensure that all changes in the community promote safety and security through the use of appropriate design strategies. #4 FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY Principle: Any changes within the Community of Sharon should be financially feasible with respect to capital and operating costs. Supporting Objectives: (i) To keep the capital and operating costs of public sector development in the Community of Sharon at a level that can be borne financially by residents and businesses. The Block Plan responds to the land use designations and policy requirements of the Sharon Community Plan. The Land Use Plan for Sharon Village is illustrated and discussed in Section 3 of this document. The following criteria, derived from the Community Plan, have been highlighted because they provide a summary of the policies, standards, and review processes that have guided the development of the Block Plan: that new neighbourhoods will integrate with existing neighbourhoods to complete the community; proposed lots abutting existing residential lots will be generally compatible with the existing character and density of the existing development; a density range of 12 to 20 residential units per gross hectare in the low density residential areas; a density range of 30 to 40 residential units per gross hectare in the medium density residential areas; a maximum density of 32 residential units per gross hectare for medium density development in the mixed use areas; identification of a Natural Heritage System of core and supporting areas that traverses the block northwest to southeast where the function, attributes and linkages of the features will be protected; SHARON SECTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION Community Development Principles Unique Heritage Character Strong Open Space System Healthy Community Financial Feasibility Malone Given Parsons Ltd. NAK Design Group MMM Group Page 1-11

SHARON SECTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION creation of environmentally sustainable recreational trails to link the key Natural Heritage Features within Sharon and with the rest of the Town; that the Community s unique historical and architectural features and small town ambience are preserved or enhanced; that the existing rates of ground water infiltration, and ground and surface water quality and quantity will be maintained and protected; that the NHS, trails, parks and other community benefits provided in the Block Plan benefit both existing and new residents; that the infrastructure and community services proposed are both cost-effective and appropriate; that capital costs of new development are covered by charges derived from that development; strive to be a sustainable, safe, diverse, compact and transit-supportive community. 1.5 Region of York Official Plan The Region s Official Plan currently assumes a planning horizon to 2026, within which the Town of East Gwillimbury is estimated to grow to 60,000 residents and 20,000 jobs. The Region of York approved the Sharon Community Plan, subject to modifications, in February 2005. The Sharon Community Plan area is within the Town and Village designation on Map 5 of the Region s Official Plan. The adjusted population of the Sharon Community Plan to 2,100 is accommodated within the population forecasts. By directing population growth onto greenfield lands within the settlement area boundary of the community of Sharon, the Block Plan conforms to the Region s Official Plan. 1.6 Provincial Policy Initiatives Since the approval of the Sharon Community Plan, three major Provincial policy initiatives have come into effect which apply to the Block Plan. PROVINCIAL POLICY STATEMENT, 2005 In March of 2005, the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS, 2005) came into effect. The Town s Official Plan and the Community Plan implement the policies of the PPS for Sharon. With regard to the Block Plan area, the PPS requires: linkages between and among natural heritage features be maintained or improved where possible; protection of significant valleylands; protection of rare and endangered species; and, protection of significant woodlands. The Block Plan provides for feature protection and the maintenance of linkages, valleylands, species and woodlands by providing for appropriate buffers in defining development limits and by limiting road crossings of these features. The PPS requires that infrastructure be provided in an efficient and cost effective manner. The Environmental Assessment for the extension of the York-Durham Sanitary Sewer is a larger infrastructure proposal that is being coordinated to serve Sharon, Holland Landing and Queensville. By providing for development within the densities anticipated in the Community Plan, the Block Plan provides for the cost effective/efficient extension of this infrastructure to Sharon. The Block Plan also provides for an alignment of the North- South Collector road that will facilitate the continuation of this infrastructure outside of the community thereby allowing for the logical construction and extension of these pieces of infrastructure. The Block Plan is consistent with the policies of the PPS. Page 1-12

GREENBELT PLAN, 2005 In February 2005, the Greenbelt Plan came into effect, preser ving over 700,000 hectares of land in the Greater Golden Horseshoe for the long-term agricultural, environmental, and recreational needs of the region. The mapping of the Plan identifies the Holland River as a River Valley Connection running to the southwest of the Community Plan Boundary. Similarly, the Block Plan identifies all river valleys and associated vegetation and provides for development limit setbacks from these features. While the Block Plan is not subject to the policies of the Greenbelt plan, it conforms to the intent of the Plan to provide for the maintenance and protection of connections outside of the Greenbelt. GROWTH PLAN FOR THE GREATER GOLDEN HORSESHOE, 2006 On June 16, 2006, the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe came into effect. The Region of York is currently undertaking the required growth management and Official Plan review exercises to implement the Growth Plan and to allocate population and employment growth to each of its constituent municipalities. The Town of East Gwillimbury is undertaking a comprehensive Official Plan review exercise to determine the allocation of growth in the municipality. The Growth Plan requires that growth be allocated in a manner that contributes to the creation of complete communities, achieving a balance of employment and population growth. In designated Greenfield Areas, growth in the Region must achieve an overall density of 50 people and jobs / hectare. In York Region, southern municipalities such as Richmond Hill, Vaughan and Markham that have absorbed high levels of growth over the past 20-25 years are reaching their growth limits. As a result of the high growth pressures facing York Region and the shrinking capacity of southern municipalities to absorb this growth, the Town of East Gwillimbury is faced with significant development pressures in areas that have been previously planned for growth and in the Agricultural and Rural areas outside of the Oak Ridges Moraine and Greenbelt Plans. The Town s Official Plan review will address these matters, and the existing Community Plan areas in East Gwillimbury, including Sharon, will be developed to achieve their planned and approved population and employment growth. The Growth Plan policies direct that 40% of all new growth on an annual basis by 2015 will be achieved through residential intensification within built-up areas. It is unlikely that significant intensification and/or high residential densities will be directed to the community of Sharon as part of the Regional / Town Official Plan reviews and Growth Plan conformity exercises. The Community Plan vision statement clearly defines the unique heritage and close-knit character of the village, and emphasizes the paramount importance of maintaining that character. It is expected Sharon Village will develop within the scale and character identified in the Sharon Community Plan. The Block Plan anticipates potential areas for limited intensification in the Provincial Built Boundary to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan and York Region Intensification approaches. The Block Plan estimates the potential intensification of 100 to 200 units. The Sharon Village Block Plan provides an appropriate balance between the Growth Plan s policy to build compact and transit supportive communities and the Community Plan s direction that Sharon be a predominantly low-density community. The Sharon Village Block Plan conforms to the policies and intent of the Growth Plan. SHARON SECTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION Provincial Policy Initiatives: Provincial Policy Statement, 2005 Greenbelt Plan, 2005 Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, 2006 Malone Given Parsons Ltd. NAK Design Group MMM Group Page 1-13

SHARON SECTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION Page 1-14

2.0 Environmental Framework This section summarizes the environmental features that comprise the Natural Heritage System in Sharon Village and describes how each will be protected, maintained or enhanced through the Block Plan. The Lake Simcoe Region Cconservation Authority has been consulted and support the proposed framework; detailed information can be found within the MESP. The Environmental Framework consists of the following elements: Watercourses Valleys Wetlands Trees and Woodlots A summary description of buffers and general development constraints is also included in this section. SHARON SECTION 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL FRAMEWORK Environmental Framework Elements: Watercourses Valleys Wetlands Ghost canal near Sharon Trees and Woodlots Example of woodlot in Sharon Malone Given Parsons Ltd. NAK Design Group MMM Group Page 2-15

SHARON SECTION 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL FRAMEWORK Figure 2.1: Watercourses Page 2-16

2.1 Watercourses The watercourses, shown in Figure 2.1 consist of the main branch of Sharon Creek, seven unnamed tributaries to Sharon Creek and one unnamed tributary that discharge directly to the East Holland River. Sharon Creek originates approximately 500 metres east of Highway 404 and approximately 1.8 km south of Green Lane. The Creek generally flows in a northerly direction, eventually discharging into the main branch of the East Holland River approximately 1.2 km north of the Green Lane / 2nd Concession intersection. The watercourses east of Leslie Street are within the headwaters of Harrison Creek, including a tributary of the Black River. The tributary flows northerly, away from the Town through agricultural and natural areas before crossing Woodbine Avenue and eventually joining with the Black River. The Block Plan incorporates measures to maintain the habitat and function of these watercourses. Engineered mitigation measures will be used to reduce the introduction of sediment, deleterious substances and erosive agents in order to sustain water quality and quantity levels and regulate thermal characteristics. A 30 metre riparian buffer is proposed around coolwater and coldwater watercourses. These watercourses, which include Sharon Creek and Tributary 5 which are also considered stable habitat for fish and other aquatic species. A 15 metre riparian buffer is proposed around warmwater watercourses. These measures respect the natural heritage system policies of the Sharon Community Plan. To achieve the type of urban form envisioned by the community, the partial enclosure of sections of Sharon Creek Tributaries 3 and 4 will be required on a portion of the northeast lands on the west side of Leslie Street. Due to the limited productivity of the reaches of Tributaries 3 and 4 to be enclosed, it is anticipated that the loss of productive capacity will be accounted for in site restoration measures elsewhere on the Block lands. Site restoration and compensation measures will be directed to the fisheries setbacks and watercourse reaches that have been significantly affected by agricultural practices and channel sections with rehabilitation potential. The upstream portion of Tributary 11 and a small area of meadow marsh that is connected to the upstream end of Tributary 10 is also expected to be eliminated during the construction and development process. Site restoration and compensation measures will be directed to the remaining portion of the Tributaries. At subsequent stages of the development process, detailed design with respect to compensation will be undertaken. The MESP report supports and further addresses the undertaking of these works. SHARON SECTION 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL FRAMEWORK The Block Plan incorporates measures to maintain the habitat and function of numerous watercourses, as well as mitigation measures that respect the natural heritage system policies of the Sharon Community Plan. Malone Given Parsons Ltd. NAK Design Group MMM Group Page 2-17

SHARON SECTION 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL FRAMEWORK Figure 2.2: Valley Corridors Page 2-18

2.2 Valleys The valley features in the Sharon Village Block Plan are illustrated in Figure 2.2, including the corridors formed by Sharon Creek, its tributaries and the tributaries of Harrison Creek. The corridor extents and limits were determined through site visits with the LSRCA. Valley corridors are the main component of the Natural Heritage System. They function as habitat for small mammals and birds and provide linkages between habitat areas within and outside of the Block Plan area. The protection and enhancement of the valleys of Sharon Village is paramount in ensuring that development occurs in an environmentally sustainable manner. The valley corridors have been incorporated into the Block Plan and will be preserved by directing development outside of the staked top-of-bank limit and 100 year flood line. The development setbacks and environmental buffers are consistent with the policies of the LSRCA and are considered proactive measures to ensuring the integration of the natural and built portions of the community. To enhance and create a sense of connection and interaction with the Natural Heritage System, an extensive trail system is shown in the valley corridors throughout Sharon Village. This trail system will take advantage of these areas to provide opportunities for sustainable recreation that provides residents with access to the valley system. By allowing for multiple access points to the valley system, and connecting the trail system to York Region s larger trail network, pedestrians and cyclists can experience nature within Sharon Village, while appreciating the connection and continuation of the Natural Heritage System to environmental areas beyond the community boundaries. Where appropriate, the following criteria were utilized to establish the extents and limits of the valley corridors: i) top of bank; ii) 10 metres from the drip line where vegetation goes beyond the top of bank. The top of bank was cooperatively staked in the field with LSRCA staff, and this limit is reflected in the Block Plan. Flood elevation modeling was undertaken using the existing model provided by the LSRCA, and augmented for certain areas to satisfy LSRCA requirements. All of this work has been incorporated into the determination of the development limit shown in the Block Plan. SHARON SECTION 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL FRAMEWORK The protection and enhancement of the valleys of Sharon Village is paramount in ensuring that development occurs in an environmentally sustainable manner. Leslie Street and Mount Albert Road, looking west onto Tributary 3 Malone Given Parsons Ltd. NAK Design Group MMM Group Page 2-19

SHARON SECTION 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL FRAMEWORK Figure 2.3: Wetlands Page 2-20

2.3 Wetlands A number of wetland features have been identified on the Block lands and are depicted on Figure 2.3. Through the preparation of the Master Environmental Servicing Plan (MESP) and Environmental Impact Study (EIS), the form, function and vegetation of these features has been studied. Many of the wetlands appear to be sustained by near surface, shallow groundwater movement within the weathered zone of the surface soils. These include numerous meadow and shallow marshes established on sloping grounds on the margins of Sharon Creek and its tributaries and the middle and lower slopes of the rolling topography at the southern boundary of the Block lands. The Block Plan recognizes the important ecological and aesthetic functions of wetlands and includes strategies to maintain the role of these features. A number of engineered mitigation measures and Best Management Practices are incorporated into the Plan to maintain sufficient predevelopment quantity and quality of water inputs (both surface and ground water) into these features. The Block Plan establishes a 10 metre buffer from the margins of the area wetlands. A 30 metre buffer is established for a locally significant wetland in the southwest corner of the lands west of Leslie Street as illustrated in Figure 2.3. Taken together, these buffers will preserve adjacent vegetation and reduce the potential for drying effects and functional degradation of the plan area s wetlands. A wetland has been identified outside and immediately south of the Block Plan area boundary, coincident with the north-south collector road alignment depicted in the Sharon Community Plan (OPA 122). To protect this wetland and provide for the protection of the adjacent woodlot in the Block Plan, the north-south collector road alignment has been slightly re-aligned, shifting to the west at the southern boundary of the plan limit. SHARON SECTION 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL FRAMEWORK The Block Plan recognizes the important ecological and aesthetic functions of wetlands, and includes several strategies and initiatives that will preserve and maintain the roles of these features. Example of a pedestrian crossing to protect wetland area Malone Given Parsons Ltd. NAK Design Group MMM Group Page 2-21

SHARON SECTION 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL FRAMEWORK Figure 2.4: Woodlands Page 2-22

2.4 Trees and Woodlots Figure 2.4 illustrates the woodland and vegetation features of the Block lands. Several Regionally Significant Woodlands are found on the lands west of Leslie Street. A smaller Regionally Significant Woodland abuts the eastern border of the Plan area to the east of Leslie Street. The Block Plan establishes a 10 metre buffer extending from the dripline of the peripheral ( edge ) trees in these woodlands in order to retain the natural extent of these features. Three hundred and sixty eight species of vascular plants were recorded within the Block lands as part of the MESP process. Thirteen species of conservation interest, including one Endangered Species, Butternut (Juglans Cinerea), and 11 species rare to York Region were observed. Figure 2.4 illustrates the location of woodlands and endangered Butternuts for preservation. Butternut species are observed throughout the lands west of Leslie Street, predominantly in hedgerows along the southern boundary and in clusters south and west of the Sharon Temple and Civic Centre. A 10 metre buffer is established from the dripline of both individual tree specimens and from the dripline of peripheral trees of the woodlands. The Block Plan anticipates that site-specific measures, including the buffering or transplanting of select Butternut, Black Maple and Black Walnut species and other endangered varieties will maintain and preserve the existing stock of these species. These measures are encouraged by the tree preservation policies of the Sharon Community Plan. It is acknowledged, however, that through site grading and other development-related processes, it will be impossible to preserve all trees and vegetation that are not within identified woodlands. In order to maintain a sufficient number of trees and vegetation for a high standard of amenity and natural appearance on the Block lands, a Tree Planting program will be initiated both for street planting and within or adjacent to buffers and other natural heritage features. The program will aim to enhance the function of natural heritage features. Opportune species varieties and appropriate planting locations will be determined through consultation with municipal, regional and LSRCA staff. SHARON SECTION 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL FRAMEWORK The MESP process identified 368 species of vascular plants, 13 species of plants with conservation interest including one provincially significant Species at Risk, and 11 species rare to York Region. Example of a typical woodlot in Sharon Malone Given Parsons Ltd. NAK Design Group MMM Group Page 2-23

SHARON SECTION 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL FRAMEWORK Figure 2.5: Development Constraints Page 2-24

Buffers The plan includes numerous setback and buffer requirements to ensure the long-term protection of environmental features. Table 2.1 summarizes the buffers and setbacks incorporated into the Block plan. Table 2.1: Environmental Buffers and Setbacks Environmental Feature Buffer Comments Watercourses Warmwater Coolwater Coldwater Woodlots / York Region Significant Woodlands Individual Specimen Trees Wetlands Floodplain Top of Bank 15 metres 30 metres 30 metres 10 metres from dripline of trees. 10 metres from dripline of tree. 10 metres from wetland margins (typical); 30 metres from wetland margin (single case at southwest limit of MESP). No development below flood line, no additional buffer. No development below top of bank. Classification completed via established criteria and field data verification. In the case of exceptions, these exceptions are noted and compensation proposed. Per Town of East Gwillimbury requirements. Proposed set back for root protection for retained Butternut trees. Proposed and detailed in the MESP. Per the LSRCA policies. Per the LSRCA policies. SHARON SECTION 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL FRAMEWORK The design and layout of the Block Plan reflects development constraints created by the undulating topography and significant environmental features. Development Constraints The Block Plan s design and layout recognizes the development constraints created by the lands topography and environmental features. The steep slopes have dictated the alignment of roads and the location of key community infrastructure and land uses, including schools and residential areas. Wetlands, watercourses and woodlands have been protected by buffers and setbacks, which will create a community plan that respects the function of these environmental features. The various development constraints have been layered on Figure 2.5 to identify the development opportunity on the Block lands, shown on this Figure as the Development Constraints Limit. Malone Given Parsons Ltd. NAK Design Group MMM Group Page 2-25

SHARON SECTION 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL FRAMEWORK Page 2-26

3.0 THE 3.1 A Sustainable Community The Community Vision and Development Principles for Sharon are framed in the context of the Town of East Gwillimbury s efforts to plan for a sustainable future and to develop character communities. The Block Plan addresses these larger municipal objectives by applying the principles of sustainable development to Sharon Village. Sustainability and sustainable development are universal concepts used as a starting point for establishing a balanced and holistic approach to development. The concepts only have meaning when they are applied and adapted to a given community, where the values and character of that community define what is actually being sustained. The rich and vibrant existing community of Sharon (as defined by the Community Vision and Development Principles) provides the values and character that are not only to be sustained, but enhanced and enriched. The Block Plan applies the key aspects of community sustainability to Sharon, where the strong existing community identity forms the basis for new development in Sharon Village. The Block Plan builds on, and is respectful of the existing community by planning for development in greenfield areas that adheres to communityspecific sustainability principles. Region: EnergyStar compliance and Transportation Demand Management (TDM). EnergyStar is a comprehensive set of standards aimed at making buildings more energy efficient. All residential within the Block Plan area will be built to EnergyStar standards. TDM is a dynamic set of strategies and initiatives aimed at managing transportation resources to ensure their efficient use, particularly with regard to reducing automobile trips in peak hours. The Block Plan has been designed in such as a way as to promote nonmotorized transportation and the clustering of trip ends. These strategies are technical, performance-based and comprise only a portion of the sustainable approaches used in the Block Plan. Sustainable Natural Environment SHARON SECTION 3.0 THE The Block Plan builds on, and is respectful of the existing community by planning for development in greenfield areas that adheres to communityspecific sustainability principles. The sustainable community embodies a context-dependent application of sustainability, wherein competing values and limited resources require best-management practices and acceptable trade-offs to meet challenges. The concept is illustrated in York Region s model of sustainable development in Figure 3.1. The Sharon Village Block Plan embodies this idea and incorporates numerous sustainable community principles required to pursue the community s goals and objectives. In particular, the Block Plan incorporates two sustainable best-management practices promoted by the Town and York Healthy Communities Sustainable Development Figure 3.1: A Sustainable Community Economic Vitality Malone Given Parsons Ltd. NAK Design Group MMM Group Page 3-27

SHARON SECTION 3.0 THE The sustainable community principles for Sharon reflected in the Block Plan are listed below. Cultural Strengthening the close-knit small-town / village atmosphere through compatible and appropriate forms of housing and well-designed streetscapes; Encouraging interactions between residents by providing a pedestrian system with access to community uses and the Natural Heritage System that encourages walking / cycling through the community; Maintaining and showcasing the heritage heart of the community through the provision of complimentary and supporting land uses in and around the Sharon Temple; Enhancing community facilities and supporting community organizations through the creation of a Civic Centre District, centering cultural activity around the Civic Centre, Sharon Temple, Park and Mixed Use area; Delineating new neighborhoods through the preservation of natural features; Protecting and maximizing the community s access to its Natural Heritage System through an integrated trail network, and the provision of trail heads at key locations; Maximizing the visible green space in the community through the provision of parks and view parks near to natural environmental areas; Page 3-28

Environmental Preserving the continuity of wildlife corridors and the Natural Heritage System Area through the minimization of fragmentation (from road and infrastructure crossings) in the Plan area, and the recognition of connections to larger systems outside of the Plan area; Maintaining water temperature in watercourses through appropriate setbacks to development, and the restoration of vegetation adjacent to watercourses; Protection of water quality and quantity through the use of best management principles for urban development; Mitigating the impacts of development on the natural environment through appropriate buffering of natural environmental areas; Maintaining ground water quantity and quality by complying with Ministry of Environment and Energy standards for water taking; Reducing phosphorous loading to watercourses by connecting all new residences to municipal sanitary services, and using Best Management Practices in decommissioning existing tile-drain agricultural lands in the Plan area. Socio-Economic Promoting opportunities for high-quality, lowmaintenance community amenities to minimize municipal maintenance costs; Providing appropriate employment opportunities in the Heritage Conservation District and mixed-use areas; Enhancing the knowledge base and employment skills within the community through the provision of highspeed telecommunication services; Transportation/Infrastructure Creating viable alternatives to the automobile by providing easy and safe access to transit and encouraging bicycling and walking; Providing good road access through the community while limiting traffic infiltration from the traveling public; Achieving cost-effective and efficient infrastructure by anticipating and accommodating road and servicing connections within and outside the community; Energy Encourage energy efficiency in the community through commitment to the Energy Star Program for all new houses in Sharon; Promote energy conservation through the development of medium density residential units with shared walls and infrastructure that reduce heating and cooling requirements; Anticipate alternative and renewable energy source production by allowing for the connection of the community to alternative energy production facilities (cogeneration) in nearby areas of the Town. SHARON SECTION 3.0 THE Sustainable Principles Cultural Environmental Socio-Economic Transportation & Infrastructure Energy Malone Given Parsons Ltd. NAK Design Group MMM Group Page 3-29

SHARON SECTION 3.0 THE Figure 3.2: Sharon Village Block Plan Page 3-30

3.2 Land Use Concept The interplay of the nine new neighbourhoods with existing neighbourhoods relies on the social and cultural binding potential of the Civic Centre District, which is comprised of the Town municipal buildings, future park and community facilities and the Sharon Temple. This focal point for community identity and activity will provide a central natural and cultural setting for the community to meet, work and play, and will be the bridge between residents new and existing. The new neighbourhoods in Sharon Village will provide investment in community infrastructure that will benefit the entire community, including new schools and parks as well as a new civic centre district that will shape Leslie Street as an active and lively streetscape that facilitates the continued use and preservation of buildings in the historic district. Moreover, the Block Plan will provide for compatible new development adjacent to the historic district to encourage the regeneration and appreciation of the heritage core of the community. Responding to the direction of the Community Plan, the majority of lands in the Block Plan are designated for low density residential development. Each neighbourhood has been planned to be pedestrian-scaled, attractive and vibrant. The Sharon Village Neighbourhoods will offer a variety of options for recreation and housing. The location and size of medium density residential areas are designed to minimize disturbance on natural features and to work with topographic constraints. It is anticipated that the medium density areas will develop with street or condo townhouses and low-rise apartments that will provide transit supportive densities along the collector roads. The road system in the community is designed to ensure efficient access for residents, while limiting through-traffic infiltration into residential areas, particularly from the North- South collector road. This will ensure the creation of closeknit streetscapes, rather than automobile orientated street patterns. Complimenting the road system, a pedestrian trail system will provide access and enjoyment of the Natural Heritage System and connections to community facilities, transit locations and adjacent neighbourhoods. The topography in the area has required creative solutions to provide for a road pattern that conforms to municipal standards, and the siting of land uses (particularly schools and medium density blocks) that allow for safe access and construction. This factor, along with the achievement of all sustainable community principles necessitated minor modifications to the Community Plan, which were adpoted by Town Council in August 2009. SHARON SECTION 3.0 THE Land Use Components Low Density Medium Density Mixed Use / Heritage District Elementary Schools Parks Stormwater Management Natural Heritage System Other Uses Civic Centre / Sharon Temple Malone Given Parsons Ltd. NAK Design Group MMM Group Page 3-31

SHARON SECTION 3.0 THE In summary, the Sharon Village Block Plan contains the following structural elements: The Sharon Temple Precinct anchored around the Civic Centre and Sharon Temple creating a focal point for social activity and a gathering place for the entire community. This area will provide a visible identity and recognizable centre for Sharon, and will be the central location where residents work and play. The creation of this area will require the enclosing of two drainage swales on the Civic Centre and Mixed Use Property; A North-South Spine Collector road that will connect to Green Lane to the south and Queensville to the north. The collector road alignment avoids a small wetland outside and to the south of the Plan boundary, maximizes the distance from existing woodlands, and crosses the Sharon Creek at a location that minimizes ecological disturbance; Preservation and enhancement of valley corridors along the Sharon Creek and tributaries; An extensive Natural Heritage System, incorporating trails for pedestrian and cycling connections throughout the community; A Heritage District to define the local cultural identity and architectural aesthetics along the Leslie Street frontage; Five neighbourhood parks; Parkettes and view parks to break-up building lines to create attractive residential streetscapes, provide vistas into natural areas, trail head access and recreational opportunities for residents at all stages of life; Four new elementary schools, one or two of which may replace the school sites in the existing community; Compatible lot sizes and a minimum rear yard of 10 m. for lots adjacent to the existing estate lots in the vicinity of David Willson Trail; Natural Heritage Civic Centre / System Temple 22% 3% Other 16% SWM 6% Parks 5% Elementary Schools 3% Mixed Use / Heritage District 2% Figure 3.3: Sharon Block Plan Land Use Summary Low Density 39% Medium Density 5% Table 3.1: Sharon Block Plan Land Use Summary LAND USE SUMMARY Land Use Area % Low Density 99.4 39% Medium Density 12.0 5% Mixed Use / Heritage District 5.3 2% Elementary Schools 7.7 3% Parks 11.7 5% Stormwater Management 15.4 6% Natural Heritage System 56.4 22% Other Uses 41.8 16% Civic Centre / Temple 6.9 3% TOTAL 256.8 100% Page 3-32

Twelve stormwater management facilities next to Natural Heritage System areas and parks to maximize large visible green areas; Nine distinct neighbourhoods largely defined by perimeter roads and the Natural Heritage System; Approximately 2,800 residential units for all neighbourhoods; and Five medium density areas, dispersed into pockets in transit supportive locations and in proximity to the civic centre district. Table 3.2: Sharon Block Plan Land Use Areas - By Neighbourhood (Net Hectares) Non Developable and Developable Areas Non-Developable Lands and NHS (1) Total Developable Area Residential Areas Medium Density Residential The Sharon Community Plan provides three designations of residential land uses exclusive of the residential potential within the Mixed Use Areas: low-density residential areas private sewage service, low density residential areas, and medium density residential areas. The low-density residential areas private sewage service designation applies only to the eastern portion of the community; no area in the Block Plan is subject to this designation. LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AREA The majority of the residential lands in the Sharon Plan are designated Low Density Residential Area, where the following dwelling units are permitted: single detached, semi-detached, duplex, townhouses. Mixed Use / Heritage District Total Residential Elementary Schools Community Uses Total Community Uses NEIGHBOURHOOD 1 Total Area 17.0 0.0 17.0 Low Density 11.8 0.0 0.0 11.8 0.0 Parks 0.2 SWM 1.9 2.1 3.1 2 27.7 3.0 24.7 14.4 1.5 0.6 16.5 1.7 1.6 0.0 3.3 4.9 3 (1) 27.3 0.0 27.3 12.7 0.0 0.0 12.7 2.4 3.7 4.1 10.2 4.4 4 (2) 23.1 0.0 23.1 13.4 1.4 0.3 15.1 2.8 0.0 0.3 3.1 4.9 5 11.5 0.0 11.5 5.4 1.1 0.0 6.5 0.0 1.2 1.1 2.2 2.8 6 14.1 0.0 14.1 9.5 0.0 0.0 9.5 0.0 0.1 0.9 1.0 3.6 7 24.9 7.2 17.7 0.0 5.5 4.4 9.9 0.0 2.5 1.9 4.4 3.5 8 13.6 2.9 10.7 4.9 2.5 0.0 7.5 0.0 0.1 1.1 1.3 2.0 9 50.00 29 2.9 47.0 27.3 00 0.0 00 0.0 27.3 09 0.9 23 2.3 41 4.1 73 7.3 12.3 Other Lands 47.6 47.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 BLOCK TOTAL 256.8 63.3 193.5 99.4 12.0 5.3 116.7 7.7 11.7 15.4 34.8 41.8 Total Other Uses SHARON SECTION 3.0 THE Low density housing is dispersed throughout the nine residential neighbourhoods, each largely defined by perimeter roads and the Natural Heritage System, with six medium density areas located in close proximity to transit and the civic centre district. 1) A stormwater pond of 3.09 ha. needed for development on the Dorzil West property, outside the Block Plan boundary, is included in Neighbourhood 3. 2) Includes the areas (total of 0.8ha.) east of the NHS on the Dorzil West Property. * Development limits are based on MMM Group constraints mapping dated October 2007. Malone Given Parsons Ltd. NAK Design Group MMM Group Page 3-33

SHARON SECTION 3.0 THE The purpose of the designation is to recognize the potential for residential development and ensure that the new development is generally compatible with the existing character of the Sharon Community. The permitted maximum density range is 12 to 20 units per gross hectare. The Block Plan contains approximately 99.4 net hectares (245.6 net acres) of Low Density Residential Area. MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AREA The Sharon Community Plan defines several Medium Density Residential Areas, where the following dwelling units are permitted: single detached, semi-detached, duplex dwellings, townhouse and quadraplexes to a maximum of three storeys including seniors or other supportive housing developments which may include apartments up to three storeys; cluster housing. The purpose of the designation is to recognize the potential for higher intensity residential development in the areas west of Leslie Street, and to ensure that such development is generally compatible with the existing character of the Sharon Community. The permitted density range is 20 to 40 units per gross hectare. Mixed Use Area The Block Plan provides for one Mixed Use Area at the southwest corner of Leslie Street and Mount Albert Road. This area will provide at-grade retail, office uses and medium density residential in accordance with the policies of the Community Plan, which permits a maximum density of 32 units per gross hectare. The Mixed Use Area accounts for approximately 5.3 net hectares (13.1 net acres) of land in the Block Plan. It is anticipated that the Mixed Use Area will develop primarily as commercial retail and office uses. However, the calculation of residential unit / population potential in this area is included in the calculation of total Block Plan population potential. Employment The Sharon Community Plan does not designate employment lands. The Block Plan anticipates that the growth in the Civic Centre, Mixed Use Area, heritage district commercial, live-work and work-at-home residential and school facilities will serve as primary employment generators within the community. It is anticipated that approximately 940 new jobs could be realized on the Block Plan lands. The Block Plan provides for approximately 12.0 net hectares (29.7 net acres) for this designation in five areas west of Leslie Street. The Block Plan refines the location and size of these areas to minimize disturbance of natural features and to work with the topography. Page 3-34

Civic Centre The Civic Centre area is located on the west side of Leslie Street and includes the Sharon Temple, administrative centre for the Town of East Gwillimbury and a park to the south of the Sharon Temple. The Civic Centre and Sharon Temple area occupy approximately 7 hectares (17 acres) of the total land area. The area is expected to serve as the social and cultural focus of the community. It is anticipated that the civic centre district will create a visual centerpiece for the community and visitors alike. The final determination of the role and function of the Civic Centre, Sharon Temple, and park to the south will be determined through a study / visioning exercise initiated by the Town. The Block Plan provides for the development of the lands adjacent to this area in a manner than conforms to the Community Plan and does not preclude the outcome of a future visioning exercise for this area. Heritage District The Heritage District Area designation in the Sharon Community Plan is aligned along both sides of Leslie Street and provides for protection and enhancement of the area s unique historic features and for the reuse of existing buildings in a manner that is compatible with the heritage character of the community. The Block Plan incorporates the Heritage District in the community design and layout in order to emphasize its role as the community core. Although the Heritage District is primarily located outside of the Block Plan area, the portions within the Block Plan are anticipated to develop under the uses permitted in the Community Plan in a manner that is compatible with the character of Leslie Street. 3.3 A Complete Community The Sharon Village Block Plan has been designed as a predominantly low-density residential community. Housing in low-density areas of the Plan will consist of single-detached, semi-detached and townhouses. In areas adjacent to existing residential communities, larger lots with larger rear yards are planned to integrate new fully serviced lots with existing privately-serviced lots. In order to achieve transit supportive densities, medium density areas consisting of low rise apartment and townhouse blocks have been located along the North-South Collector Road, west of the Civic Centre district and Mixed Use area on the west side of Leslie Street at the northern boundary of the community. These areas have been located to generally conform to the locations identified in the Community Plan. The estimate of 8,800 new residents anticipated for the Sharon Community is derived from the planned potential of low and medium density areas. Table 3.3 summarizes the population estimate for the community of Sharon to the year 2031. The 8,800 new residents, combined with the existing 2,900 residents, brings the total anticipated population of the Sharon Community to approximately 11,700. The possibility for intensification of areas within the Sharon Community that are not a part of the Block Plan process (including the mixed use area at the southwest corner of Leslie Street and Mount Albert Road) is estimated at 100-200 units with a population of 400 people. Taking potential intensification into account, the overall potential population is estimated to be approximately 12,100 residents. SHARON SECTION 3.0 THE The Block Plan anticipates that employment will be generated primarily by the Mixed Use Area, the Civic Centre, the Heritage District, and live-work and work-athome residential. Malone Given Parsons Ltd. NAK Design Group MMM Group Page 3-35

SHARON SECTION 3.0 THE Table 3.3: Sharon Village Densities and Unit/Population Yield Land Use AREA Gross Hectares DENSITY RANGE Units / Gross Hectare UNIT YIELD RANGE Low to MEDIAN DENSITY Hectare Type Low Density (2) 176.1 6 to 20 1,056 to 3,521 2,289 82% 13.00 3,500 to 11,660 7,580 86% Medium Density Townhomes / Blocks 12.0 20 to 40 241 to 481 361 13% 30.00 670 to 1,340 1,005 11% Mixed-Use / Heritage District 5.3 20 to 32 105 to 168 137 5% 26.00 190 to 300 245 3% TOTAL (3) 193.5 1,402 to 4,171 2,800 100% 14.47 4,360 to 13,300 8,800 100% High MEDIAN UNIT YIELD Units Unit Share by Type Units / Gross Low POPULATION YIELD (1) to High MEDIAN POPULATION YIELD Population Population Share by (1) Low Density population based on 3.31 persons per unit, Medium Density population based on 2.78 persons per unit, and Mixed-Use population based on 1.78 persons per unit. (2) Total Low Density Gross Hectares excludes existing land uses and the Natural Heritage System. (3) Numbers may not add due to rounding. With regard to employment, it is anticipated that approximately 940 new jobs could be realized from the Mixed-Use, live-work and work-at-home residential, heritage district and schools in the Plan Area. This recognizes the potential for: A retail commercial anchor tenant, associated commercial retail units and office space in the Mixed Use Block at Leslie Street and Mount Albert Road; A restaurant or similar use in the heritage district block south of the Sharon Temple; Employees at two new schools and the expansion of two relocated schools; Work-at-home in the general population. Table 3.4 on the following page provides the planned employment assumptions utilized in the preparation of the Block Plan. The Plan can achieve an approximate total of 9,740 people and jobs, over the total developable area of approximately 190 hectares. This would result in the achievement of a greenfield density of 50 people and jobs per gross hectare in the plan area. The Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe generally requires the achievement of a density of 50 people and jobs per hectare over the entire Region. The Town can endorse any development so long as that development does not undermine its ability to achieve the overall population and employment allocated by the Region. The Block Plan greenfield density of 50 people and jobs per hectare provides growth that is compatible with existing neighbourhoods, yet achieves an overall density that is substantially higher than in the existing community. This is accomplished while remaining within the Region s forecasted population for the Town to 2026 and within the residential density permissions in the Sharon Community Plan. The Block Plan provides for the creation of a complete community in Sharon, with an appropriate range of housing, as well as adequate employment, community and commercial uses to serve the population. Page 3-36

Table 3.4: Estimate of New Jobs in Sharon Village Mixed Use Areas Floor Area (sq. m.) Employees Per 1,000 sq. m. (1) Jobs Retail 9,700 37.16 260 Office 3,000 29.73 100 Restaurant 20 Total Mixed Use Jobs 380 Schools Sites Employees Per School / School Expansion (2) Jobs New Elementary Schools East of Leslie Street 2 40 80 Expansion/Replacement of Existing Elementary Schools 2 20 40 Total School Related Jobs 120 Work-at-Home New Population 2006 Census Workat-Home Rate Jobs 8,800 5.00% 440 Total Work-at-Home Jobs 440 Total New Jobs 940 (1) Retail Assumption taken from the Town of East Gwillimbury 2009 Development Charge Study, Office Assumption taken from the Town of Newmarket 2009 Devleopment Charge Study. (2) Employment at Elementary Schools in East Gwillimbury determined in consultation with Public School Board. SHARON SECTION 3.0 THE The Block Plan provides for the creation of a complete community in Sharon, with an appropriate range of housing, as well as adequate employment, community and commercial uses to serve the population. Malone Given Parsons Ltd. NAK Design Group MMM Group Page 3-37

SHARON SECTION 3.0 THE Figure 3.4: Neighbourhoods Page 3-38

3.4 Neighbourhood Structure The community structuring elements establish a framework within which there are natural limits for nine distinct neighbourhoods. These neighbourhoods are outlined on Figure 3.4. The Natural Heritage System (including valleys and watercourses, ponds, woodlots) creates a natural setting that is an exceptional context for planning the community. The Sharon Creek valley system and north-south collector create boundaries for nine distinct neighbourhoods. SHARON SECTION 3.0 THE Activity in these new areas of Sharon will be focused by the schools, parks and transit along the spine of the collector Roads. Medium density areas are located along and near the collectors to provide transit supportive densities. The remainder of this area will consist of low density housing, with larger lots adjacent to the existing neighbourhood and the valley system. Two neighbourhoods are identified on either side of Leslie Street in the northern portion of the Plan Area. The neighbourhood northwest of Mount Albert Road and Leslie Street is separate and distinct from other areas in the Plan, connected to the larger community via the trail system and its exposure to Mount Albert Road and Leslie Street. The neighbourhood east of Leslie Street will be designed with appropriate lot sizes to be compatible with the existing community immediately to the south, and will over time function as contiguous to these existing neighbourhoods. Example of a stormwater management area with pedestrian trail The Natural Heritage System and community structuring elements establish a framework within which there are natural limits for nine distinct neighbourhoods. The following Table 3.5, provides a summary of the character and elements of each neighbourhood. Examples of townhouses Malone Given Parsons Ltd. NAK Design Group MMM Group Page 3-39

SHARON SECTION 3.0 THE Table 3.5: Summary of Elements of Each Neighbourhood Neighbourhood Neighbourhood Elements/Character 1 Southern Residential Enclave Valley lands to north and west, North-South Collector Road to east, Community Plan boundary to south; A parkette and connections to t h e trail system and on-road bicycle route provide pedestrian access through the Natural Heritage System to School/Park in adjacent neighbourhoods; Excellent York Region Transit (YRT) bus service coverage: entire neighbourhood within a 500m (5 minute average walking distance) of proposed transit stops; Lot sizes reflect the residential connection to the Natural Heritage System; This neighbourhood will develop into several small residential enclaves, with a close-knit feel that is enhanced by the surrounding natural areas; Significant grades will result in deeper lot fabric in some areas. 2 Southern Gateway North-South Collector Road to west, existing residential to north, Leslie Street to east, Community Plan boundary to south; Good access to trail and bike system along collector roads and Sharon Creek tributary provide connections to school in adjacent neighbourhoods and to Leslie Street; Excellent YRT bus service coverage: entire neighbourhood within 500m of proposed transit stops; Larger frontage and minimum 10m rear yard for lots abutting existing residential ensures integration of new and existing development; Neighbourhood Park as an entrance feature and View Park located adjacent to woodlot; Central median on the North-South Collector and architectural features to define the southern entryway to neighbourhood; This neighbourhood will function as the southern gateway to the Community from Leslie Street. Page 3-40

Table 3.5: Summary of Elements of Each Neighbourhood (continued) Neighbourhood Neighbourhood Elements/Character 3 West Central 4 Central Valley lands to west, north and south, North-South Collector Road to east; Significant variation of grades create a curvilinear street patterns with interesting and attractive streetscapes; Public school board school/park campus with adjoining wooded Park for the central feature of the neighbourhood and the community; Extensive access to trail and bike system; Very good YRT bus service coverage: majority of the neighbourhood with 500m of proposed transit stops. This neighbourhood will function as the central neighbourhood west of the collector, providing school/parks within walking distance of the surrounding neighbourhoods. North-South Collector Road to west, valley lands to north and east and existing residential and natural features to south. Significant variation of grades create a modified street pattern at the north portion of neighbourhood; Main entryway of trail system to Natural Heritage System; Separate school is the central feature of the neighbourhood with the school sited along the Collector Road; Good access to trail and bike system provide connections t to Natural Heritage System; Excellent VIVA bus service coverage: entire neighbourhood within 500m of proposed transit stops; Larger frontage and minimum 10m rear yard for lots abutting existing residential; This neighbourhood will function as the central neighbourhood west of the existing community, providing a school within walking distance of the surrounding neighbourhoods, and accomplishing the compatible interface between new growth and existing residential neighbourhoods. SHARON SECTION 3.0 THE Neighbourhoods: 1. Southern Residential Enclave 2. Southern Gateway 3. West Central 4. Central 5. Northern Gateway 6. Northern Residential Enclave 7. Civic Centre 8. West Leslie 9. Northern Community Extension Malone Given Parsons Ltd. NAK Design Group MMM Group Page 3-41

SHARON SECTION 3.0 THE Table 3.5: Summary of Elements of Each Neighbourhood (continued) Neighbourhood 5 Northern Gateway Neighbourhood Elements/Character Community Plan boundary to west, Mount Albert Road to north, valley lands to east and south; Grid street pattern provides for efficient low density residential layout; Window street treatment on Mount Albert Road showcases community to the traveling public; North-South Collector Road with median in collector and architectural features at Mount Albert Road to respond to grades and limit vehicular access; Trailhead park with parking area provides main access to spine trail; Good Access to school/parks to south via North-South Collector Road; Excellent YRT bus service coverage: entire neighbourhood within 500m of proposed transit stops; This neighbourhood will function as the northern entry to the community along the North-South Collector, and a main access point to the trail system. 6 Northern Residential Enclave Valley lands to west, north and south, Civic Centre to east; Very good YRT bus service coverage: majority of the neighbourhood with 500m of proposed transit stops. Good access to school/parks to the south via the North South Collector Road and trail system through the Natural Heritage System; This neighbourhood will function as residential enclave, providing a transition from the Civic Centre District through low density residential with strong connections to the Natural Heritage System. Page 3-42

Table 3.5: Summary of Elements of Each Neighbourhood (continued) Neighbourhood Neighbourhood Elements/Character 7 Civic Centre 8 West Leslie Valley lands and Neighbourhood 6 to west, Mount Albert Road to north, Leslie Street, existing residential, Heritage District to east, valley lands to south; Civic Centre District will be the centre for cultural activity in the community; A mixed-use area at the corner of Mount Albert Road and Leslie Street will provide at-grade commercial opportunities to encourage community gathering in this location. The Sharon Temple and Civic Centre define the streetscape and establishes the character of this neighbourhood; Highest concentration of medium density in the community, providing for activity and community focus west of the Civic Centre lands; Neighbourhood park with trail connections to adjacent neighbourhood and the Natural Heritage System south of the Sharon Temple; Good access to schools in adjacent neighbourhoods to the south via local roads and the Collector; Excellent YRT bus service coverage: entire neighbourhood within 500m of proposed transit stops. This neighbourhood will provide a range of uses and density that will encourage a lively interaction of residents along Leslie Street and in the Mixed Use area. Valley lands to west, Community Plan boundary to north, Leslie Street to east, Mount Albert Road to south; Excellent YRT bus service coverage: entire neighbourhood within 500m of proposed transit stops; Fair access to school/parks to east and south via trail connections, collector and arterial roads; Excellent access to spine trail system, with a prominent green space defined by the conjunction of the storm water management pond and Natural Heritage System; Medium density block along Mount Albert Road is buffered from existing residential by low density residential and Natural Heritage System/Trail; Medium density block along Leslie Street has the potential for seniors housing in low rise apartment format; The neighbourhood will function as an extension of existing residential lots to the northern limit of the community and recognizes the prominent exposures to Mount Albert Road and Leslie Street. SHARON SECTION 3.0 THE Neighbourhoods: 1. Southern Residential Enclave 2. Southern Gateway 3. West Central 4. Central 5. Northern Gateway 6. Northern Residential Enclave 7. Civic Centre 8. West Leslie 9. Northern Community Extension Malone Given Parsons Ltd. NAK Design Group MMM Group Page 3-43

SHARON SECTION 3.0 THE Table 3.5: Summary of Elements of Each Neighbourhood (continued) Neighbourhood 9 Northern Community Extension Neighbourhood Elements/Character Leslie Street to west, Community Plan boundary to north and east, existing residential and East Gwillimbury Community Centre to south. Low density residential with larger lots and landscaped buffers along the interface with the existing neighbourhoods to the south to maintain appropriate compatibility; Two elementary school sites with active park space; Excellent YRT bus service coverage: entire neighbourhood within 500m of proposed transit stops; Good bicycle and trail connections to west and south provide pedestrian accessibility to East Gwillimbury Community Centre and future schools; Noise mitigation measures will be required along Highway 404 exposure; This neighbourhood will function as an extension of the existing neighbourhood to south and is designed to be compatible with the existing lot fabric. Page 3-44

Pedestrian/Trail/Bike System A system of sidewalks, trails and bicycle paths and lanes has been planned to provide service throughout the Block, and to allow non-automobile connections to and through the Natural Heritage System. The system is composed of the following walkway / bicycle way types: The Natural Heritage System and combined off-street Pedestrian / Bicycle Trail; The Street Bikeway System with dedicated bicycle lanes; On-street Marked Bikeways; and The Sidewalk System The Sidewalk System is shown on Figure 3.5 and has been designed to generally satisfy the following Town policies for sidewalks as stated in Section 6.2 of the Community Plan: (viii) All new roads being developed and all existing roads being reconstructed, shall provide the following, unless otherwise permitted by the Town: (d) sidewalks, generally constructed on at least one side of a Local Road and in the following circumstances, usually required on both sides of the road: a Local Road which approximates the function of a Collector Road, in terms of continuity and interconnection with other roads; a Local Road serving a school, Community Park, or Neighbourhood Park; and, a Local Road which provides a link with walkways, bicycle paths, and open space links. The sidewalk width will be designed to conform to municipal standards and will generally be 1.5 metres. The sidewalk system provides for pedestrian access between open space connections and community uses throughout the plan. Moreover, sidewalks are provided on both sides of roads with right-of-ways in excess of 20 metres and in recognition of YRT bus service and function of these roads as the main pedestrian connection between neighbourhoods. For local roads, municipal maintenance costs are minimized by generally providing sidewalks that are located on the north or east sides of streets or adjacent to schools and parks, where maximum exposure to sunlight in winter months will prevent excessive ice and snow accumulation. The proposed Pedestrian, Trail and Bike system is illustrated in Figure 3.5. The Pedestrian system will allow for the safe movement of residents from residential areas to transit stops, commercial areas and institutional uses. The Natural Heritage Trail will connect all major valleys, parks and open space areas within the block and will provide for passive recreation, walking and biking. A spine trail, running along the hydro transmission corridor will act as an anchor to the Natural Heritage System Trail. The spine trail is expected to form an extension of the Nokiidaa Trail, a regional trail system that connects the communities of Aurora, East Gwillimbury, Georgina and Newmarket. The Nokiidaa Trail is expected to be expanded in the future to link the area to Lake Simcoe in the north and the Trans Canada Trail in the south. Trails proposed within the Natural Heritage System will generally be constructed with porous paving material to limit surface run-off and will be aligned outside and at the top of valleys. Where feasible and environmentally acceptable, these trails will traverse features and descend into valleys to provide for a deeper connection with the natural environment. SHARON SECTION 3.0 THE Pedestrian/Trail/Bike System: Natural Heritage Syste Off-Street Pedestrian / Bicycle Trail Street Bikeway System On-street Marked Bikeways Sidewalk System Malone Given Parsons Ltd. NAK Design Group MMM Group Page 3-45

SHARON SECTION 3.0 THE Figure 3.5: Pedestrian, Trail and Bike System Page 3-46

The design criteria proposed for these trail components are: A 2 m wide surface for secondary trails and a 3 m surface for the Spine Trail along the hydro corridor; Buffer planting adjacent to any adjacent residential lots; Environmental buffer plantings adjacent to any sensitive natural features; Pedestrian lighting, seating and garbage areas at strategic locations along the trail system, as determined by the Town; Parking areas at Mount Albert Road / North-South Collector trailhead. The on-street Bicycle Route System is generally planned to travel along collector roads. Dedicated bicycle lanes with a width of 1.5 m will be provided in the North-South Collector road. On all other collector roads, bicycle routes will be identified by on-street signage. The route system has been designed as a loop to reduce backtracking. These measures provide cyclists with a safe and efficient route and establish a sense of place for cyclists in the community. The local trail system provides non-motorized access to other areas of York Region through connection to the York Region Trail System. The Spine Natural Heritage System Trail that runs along the hydro transmission corridor will provide a key linkage to this regional system. It is further expected that the dedicated bike route along the North-South collector will be extended in concert with this roadway, thereby providing a direct connection to Queensville and Holland Landing to the west and Newmarket and the East Gwillimbury GO Station to the south. Example of an active transportation pathway SHARON SECTION 3.0 THE The Natural Heritage Trail connects all major valleys, parks and open space areas within the community, and the Spine Natural Heritage System Trail is intended as an extension of the Nokiidaa Trail connecting Aurora, East Gwillimbury, Georgina and Newmarket, with plans to create future linkages to Lake Simcoe and the Trans Canada Trail. Malone Given Parsons Ltd. NAK Design Group MMM Group Page 3-47

SHARON SECTION 3.0 THE Schools The York Region Catholic Separate School Board and the York Region District School Board were consulted to determine the school requirements for Sharon Village. The Block Plan provides for the optimum distribution of four new school sites; two elementary sites in the western portion of the community, and two partial elementary sites in the northern portion of the community. The proposed and existing school sites are indicated on Figure 3.6: Community Uses. Preliminary site layouts for the schools/parks are included in a separate Urban Design Guidelines report. Neither school board expects that a secondary school site will be required within the community. Sacred Heart Separate Secondary School will continue to accept feeder students from Sharon, and Huron Heights Public Secondary School in Newmarket will continue to accept feeder students until such time as a planned Secondary School Site in Holland Landing is constructed. French immersion Public School students are being sent to Newmarket High School. In the western portions of the community, sites for a separate and public elementary school have been identified and generally located according to the Sharon Community Plan. Access to the school sites is planned via local roads. The siting of the school sites has been determined by the topography in this area, where the proposed location corresponds to the flattest grades in the Block Plan and avoids the significant landscape variation that would render other potential school sites unsuitable. Where possible, schools are located adjacent to a neighbourhood park, providing opportunity for shared play areas for students and centralizing the recreational space for the neighbourhoods west of Leslie Street. School / park sites are generally located to minimize walking distance within neighbourhoods and to be the recreational centre for the westerly neighbourhoods. The two partial elementary school sites set aside at the northern boundary of the community will provide school capacity for the easterly portions of the community in the future. The school sites are located with flankage and servicing connections from a collector road within the Community Plan boundary. Both school sites will be developed as a campus with a single neighbourhood park in this portion of the community. Criteria for site configuration were: School sites are designed to achieve a minimum size of 2.46 ha; Per Section 3.5.3.2 of the Community Plan and where possible, neighbourhood parks generally 1.6 hectares adjacent to school sites, maintaining a minimum size of 1.4 hectares to meet the Town s active need requirements; School sites are located in proximity to collector roads to provide for easy bus access, and take access from local roads to provide safe access for pedestrians and automobiles. During the preparation of Draft Plans of Subdivision, the number, location and size of the schools in this Block Plan should be reflected in the implementing plans. It is anticipated that the ultimate location of schools will be finally determined through the subdivision process. Changes in the number, location and size of schools will not require an adjustment to this Block Plan as long as the school sites provided meet the anticipated need of both school boards and are satisfactory to the Town. Page 3-48

Parks and Open Space The meandering Natural Heritage System provides a rich natural amenity and habitat in the midst of the Sharon Village Block. The Sharon Creek, its tributaries and the East Holland River tributaries will define the western neighbourhoods of this community, and provide an exceptional opportunity for creating an enduring open space system. The open space system will provide for environmental protection along watercourses and within woodlots, enhancing natural self-sustaining vegetation and providing wildlife corridors and habitat through the urbanized community. The extensive trail and bike system will enable residents to interact with the natural beauty and diversity in this system, while minimizing human disturbance to sensitive ecological areas. Opportunities for active recreation are provided within the parks throughout the Block Plan, which have been located wherever feasible to be contiguous with natural areas to maximize visible green space in the community. The intent is to maximize the opportunity for people to play, live and interact within and adjacent to the natural environment. The overall intent in the location of park space has been to centralize active neighbourhood parks to be within a 500 m walking distance of most neighbourhoods, and to disperse smaller parkettes to create enticing vistas into natural areas and informal locations for social interaction with neighbourhoods. The parkettes provide recreational places within a 5 minute walk for people at all stages of life. Accordingly, it is intended that parkettes could accommodate smaller scales of play and exercise / activity equipment to encourage people of all ages to stay active outside of, but close to home. Given the potential for active uses, both neighbourhood parks and parkettes will be used for the calculation of parkland dedication requirements for the Block. The view parks will serve to create breaks in the residential street fabric and maximize the impression of the natural environment intermingling with the urban. In the western neighbourhoods the challenging topography combined with the preference of providing neighbourhood parks adjacent to school sites has required that neighbourhood parks be located on tableland away from Natural Heritage System Areas. To accomplish the connection of these neighbourhood parks with the natural areas, smaller parkettes and open space view parks have been configured to provide visible access from neighbourhood parks to natural areas along local roads. The park to the south of the Sharon Temple (save and except the Ramsay House) will be dedicated to the Town for the inclusion into the Civic Centre District. The particular use of this park will be determined through a Town-lead study process that will integrate this important community asset into an overall vision for the Sharon Temple and Civic Centre property. The Neighbourhood Park (NP#3) proposed in the northeastern portion of the community provides for a direct connection to the Natural Heritage System and will augment the existing parks and community Centre to the south in providing for the recreational needs of the eastern neighbourhoods. Stormwater Management ponds are located adjacent to natural areas in order to maximize perceptible greenspace and to utilize ideal locations for such infrastructure. The ponds will be attractive open space amenities and functioning green infrastructure that will handle surface run-off from urban development. SHARON SECTION 3.0 THE The Block Plan distributes four new schools sites throughout the community, with two elementary sites in the western portion and two elementary sites in the northern. Malone Given Parsons Ltd. NAK Design Group MMM Group Page 3-49

SHARON SECTION 3.0 THE Figure 3.6: Community Uses Page 3-50

Tableland woodlots are also an asset in the community s open space system. The woodlot on the west side of the community may be dedicated to the Town as a passive park providing a place for environmental learning and study. The Parkland Standards for Neighbourhood Parks in the Community Plan are as follows: 3.5.3.2 Parkland Standards (i) The standards for the provision of parkland shall be: (c) Neighbourhood Parkland - 1.0 hectares per 1000 persons. (iv) Neighbourhood Parks shall serve the residential neighbourhoods in the Community and they shall: (a) generally be a minimum of 1.6 hectares in size; and, (b) provide for both passive and active outdoor recreational facilities, as well as limited indoor facilities. The park system illustrated on Figure 3.6 has been summarized in Table 3.6. Table 3.7 calculates the parkland dedication required in the Block Plan under the Planning Act requirements. Five Neighbourhood Parks are planned for the community; two central parks west of Leslie Street adjacent to school sites, one passive wooded park on the west side of the community, one park adjacent to the Sharon Temple, and one park to the north of Mount Albert Road adjacent to two school sites. During the preparation of Draft Plans of Subdivision, the location and size of the neighbourhood parks in this Block Plan should be reflected in the implementing plans. It is anticipated that the final size of the neighbourhood parks as well as the number and location of parkettes / view parks will be finally determined through the subdivision process. Modifications relating to the number, size and location of parks will not require an adustment to the Block Plan so as long as the total parkland supplied is suitable for dedication to the Town under the Planning Act requirements. SHARON SECTION 3.0 THE The open space system will provide for environmental protection along watercourses and within woodlots, enhancing natural selfsustaining vegetation and providing wildlife corridors and habitat through the urbanized community. Malone Given Parsons Ltd. NAK Design Group MMM Group Page 3-51

SHARON SECTION 3.0 THE Table 3.6: Parkland Summary Park Neighbourhood Park #1 Neighbourhood Park #2 Function Large neighbourhood park for active play including junior / senior play areas, water play area / splash pad, adult fitness station, open play area and mini soccer pitch. This park is adjacent to the Natural Heritage System providing a connection to the local trail system as well as serving as an entrance feature to the community from the south. Neighbourhood park for active play in combination with adjacent school, including water play area, junior / senior play areas, a skate zone, basketball courts, and open space. The park's exposure to the collector road as well as the Natural Heritage System provides access to neighbourhoods to the north. Neighbourhood Park #3 Large neighbourhood park for active play for two adjacent school sites, including water play area, junior / senior play areas, adult fitness stations, a skate zone, and basketball and tennis courts. It is linked with the Natural Heritage and trail system. Neighbourhood Park #4 Neighbourhood park for passive equipment and study of tableland wooded area. Neighbourhood Park #5 Neighbourhood park adjacent to the Sharon Temple historical area to the north. A connection to the trail system provides access to the adjacent Natural Heritage System to the south. Parkettes Parks that provide low intensity activity, including junior play areas and adult fitness opportunities for people of all ages within neighbourhoods. Parkettes also provide opportunities for informal social interaction. View Parks Passive parks which provide seating, views and connections to the Natural Heritage System. Table 3.7: Parkland Dedication Requirement Land Use Area Density Range Unit Range Planning Act Park Area Required (gross ha) (units/gross ha) Requirements (ha) Range (ha) Low Density 176.1 6 to 20 1,056 to 3,521 5% 8.80 to 8.80 Medium Density Townhomes / Blocks 12.0 20 to 40 241 to 481 1 ha / 300 units 0.80 to 1.60 Mixed Use / Heritage District 5.3 20 to 32 105 to 168 2% 0.11 to 0.11 TOTAL 193.5 1,402 to 4,171 9.71 to 10.51 Page 3-52

Cultural Heritage and Heritage Structures An archaeological assessment of the Block lands identified four historic sites. These sites are the: 1) Temple Farm site (area west of Sharon Temple lands); 2) McLeod site (southwest corner of Mount Albert Road and Leslie Street); 3) Willson site (area surrounding the Sharon Temple); and 4) A newly encountered historic site approximately 750 m north of Green Lane Road and 200 m west of Leslie Street. Three historic homesteads and one church were documented on the Block lands. The majority of the historic community of Sharon, including two additional churches and the Sharon Temple, fall outside of the study area boundaries. The report recommends that if the Temple Farm site and the McLeod site cannot be protected from impact, further work should be undertaken in order to determine the limits and function of the areas and their features. The Sharon Temple is a Federal and Provincially recognized historical site, and a focal point within the community of Sharon. Protection from external impacts when developing in proximity to the temple lands is required. Through a Heritage Impact Study, mitigation methods including a natural buffer along the western edge of the Temple site, grade separation to protect sight lines and limiting building heights to the western boundary will help minimize any disturbance to the Sharon Temple. Both the Sharon Temple Museum Society and the Ontario Heritage Trust have been consulted and support the proposed mitigation methods. Specific details regarding the mitigation methods will be finalized through the Draft Plans of Subdivision process, as identified with a Heritage Impact Statement. The remainder of the study area, including the Willson and newly encountered site, represent little heritage value and should be considered free from archeological concern. The archaeological clearances for the Block will be dealt with through the Draft Plans of Subdivision process as outlined by the archaeological report. Noise Attenuation A noise impact study will analyze noise sources affecting the Block lands. This report will be adjusted and updated as a condition of draft approval to determine the precise height of noise attenuation measures required once final grading is established. The sources of noise that must be mitigated emanate from traffic on the North-South Collector, Mount Albert Road, Leslie Street, Highway 404 extension, and a potential commercial loading area in the Mixed Use Area. The design of the community has anticipated that these noise sources must be attenuated. Areas that will likely require noise attenuation barrier are generally adjacent to arterial roads. Treatment of these locations could include fencing in the common community style in combination with landscaping treatments. SHARON SECTION 3.0 THE The Sharon Temple, a Federal and Provincially recognized historical site, is a focal point within the community of Sharon and will be protected from development disturbances through a number of approved mitigation measures. Malone Given Parsons Ltd. NAK Design Group MMM Group Page 3-53

SHARON SECTION 3.0 THE Draft Plans of Subdivision The Block Plan provides the basis for the preparation and approval of draft plans of subdivision for individual properties. The plans of subdivision will address more detailed design matters, including the compatibility of lot sizes / frontage immediately adjacent to existing development. The nature and scale of architectural and gateway features at entry points into the community are detailed in the Urban Design Guidelines. It is the policy of the Sharon Community Plan that a Master Servicing Plan (the MESP/EIS) shall be prepared on a subwatershed basis for all development west of Leslie Street prior to Council approving any new development. The Block s MESP/EIS studies were developed and modified with input from the LSRCA and Region of York. The Community Plan provides the scope of the MESP: The Master Servicing Plan shall include detailed requirements and costs for the following: (i) water supply and distribution; (ii) sanitary sewage system; (iii) storm water management based in the existing Stormwater Management Study for the Community including lands outside the boundaries of the Community Plan as is appropriate and necessary to properly plan the major servicing facilities and works for the Community; (iv) other trunk utilities for the Community, as well as large, above-ground utility structures; (v) road facilities, including spacing of major intersections and necessary improvements to existing major intersections; (vi) transportation facilities; including consideration of: (a) the existing traffic volumes and capacities of Leslie Street, Second Concession and Woodbine Avenue; (b) traffic volumes generated by the proposed development; (c) traffic volumes projected from development in the Queensville Community; (d) a phasing plan identifying the timing of improvements as triggers for the respective phases of development in Sharon including consideration of the timing of the north-south collector road from Green Lane to Doane Road and the extension of Highway 404; and, (e) transportation improvements needed to support specified population thresholds to allow development to occur in phases. The Block Plan has been prepared in concert with the MESP and EIS. This will ensure that proposed development respects and buffers natural heritage features, is structured around the transportation and servicing network, and will occur in logical phases. The draft plans will in turn, be based on the coordinated approach of the approved Block Plan, MESP and EIS. Zoning All development applications within Sharon Village, with the exception of the Mixed Use Area, will be premised on the specific zoning standards in this Block Plan and the general standards of By-law 97-50. Provided in Table 3.8 are the proposed Zoning Standards that will guide new residential development in the Block Plan Area. Zoning By-law Amendment applications will be submitted along with Draft Plan of Subdivision applications. The Mixed Use Area will be developed for either commercial, office, residential, or a mix of these uses. Accordingly, the Block Plan anticipates that forthcoming site plan applications for the Mixed Use block will be accompanied by a site-specific Zoning By-law Amendment application. Page 3-54

Table 3.8: Proposed Sharon Village Residential Zone Standards Zone Use Minimum Setbacks Minimum Minimum Front Rear Sideyards L ot Width Lot Area Yard Yard Int. Ext. Maximum Height Min. Floor Area/ Unit Size Min. Parking Spaces Max. Garage Width Max. Lot Coverage SHARON R2-X Single 18m 540m 2 4.5m to house 6.0m to garage 10 m 1.2m 3.0m 11.0m 100m 2 2 50% 50% R3-X R4-X R5-X Single Single Single 15m 13.7m 12.2m 450m 410m 360m 2 4.5m to house 6.0m to garage 2 4.5m to house 6.0m to garage 2 4.5m to house 6.0m to garage (1) 7.0m 1.2m 3.0m 11.0m 100m (1) 7.0m 1.2m 3.0m 11.0m 100m (1) 7.0m 1.2m 3.0m 11.0m 100m 2 2 2 2 2 2 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% SECTION 3.0 THE R6-X R7-X Single Singles and Semi's 10.7m 9m R8-X Semi-Detached 13.8m R9-X R9-RL RM1-X RM2-X Townhouse (Street) Townhouse (Rear Lane) Multiple Residential ( Block & Maisonette) Multiple Residential (Apartment/Seniors) (1) One sideyard may be reduced to 0.6m. 5.5m 6.7m 320m 270m 410m 165m 210m 30.0m 900m 30.0m 3000m 2 4.5m to house 6.0m to garage 2 4.5m to house 6.0m to garage 2 4.5m to house 6.0m to garage 2 4.5m to house 6.0m to garage 2 3.0m to house 2 2 0.25m to garage(3) (2) May include 1 garage space per dwelling unit. Condo units require 1.5 spaces per dwelling unit plus 0.25 spaces for visitor parking. (3) From Lane Right-of-Way. (1) 7.0m 1.2m 3.0m 11.0m 100m (1) 7.0m 1.2m 3.0m 11.0m 80m (1) 7.0m 1.2m 3.0m 11.0m 80m (1) 7.0m 1.2m 3.0m 11.0m 80m (1) 7.0m 1.2m 3.0m 11.0m 80m (1) 3.0m 6.0m 1.2m 3.0m 11.0m 80m 2 1.5/unit(2) n/ a 7.5m 7.5m 6.0m 6.0m 12.0m 2 2 2 2 2 70m 2 / unit Apt. 55m 2 / unit Snr. 2 2 2 2 2 Senior: 1/4 units Other: 1.5/unit (2) 50% 50%. 65% 65% n/a n/a 50% 50%. 65% 65% n/a 50% 50% All development applications within Sharon Village, with the exception of the Mixed Use Area, will be premised on the specific zoning standards in this Block Plan and the general standards of By-law 97-50. Malone Given Parsons Ltd. NAK Design Group MMM Group Page 3-55

SHARON SECTION 3.0 THE Page 3-56

4.0 SERVICING 4.1 Urban Services The Sharon Village Block will be developed on full urban services. The location of watermains, sanitary sewers and stormwater facilities has been planned to the Town of East Gwillimbury s design criteria. The design and layout of the Block s urban services ensure functional efficiency and reliability while minimizing landform alterations and disruption to environmental features. 4.2 Water Supply Water supply for Sharon is the responsibility of the Region of York. This includes the operation of pumping stations, storage facilities and trunk mains. Local distribution is the responsibility of the local municipality. Water supply to Sharon Village will be provided by the existing well system and the 600 mm Leslie Street watermain which interconnects the Queensville, Holland Landing and Newmarket area wells and pumping stations. The new development on the east side of Leslie Street will connect to the existing water distribution system in Sharon. The new Queensville Reservoir will service the new development on the west side of Leslie Street. An adequate water supply will be available to service the proposed development. 4.3 Sanitary Servicing It is expected that the Sharon Village Block will outlet to an extension of the York Durham Sanitary System (YDSS), the Region s major trunk sanitary sewer. The extension of the YDSS is anticipated to be complete by the end of 2011. The YDSS is anticipated to connect to the Block at the southwest corner of the lands west of Leslie Street. A sanitary pumping station abutting the northern edge of the hydro corridor, east of the major spine collector road is proposed to control and manage on-site sewage storage and conveyance. Both the water distribution (Figure 4.1.) and sanitary sewer (Figure 4.2) systems have been designed with regard for the environment and the ecological functions of the Block lands. Wherever possible, the systems are located within proposed rights of ways as shown on the Sharon Community Plan and the Block Plan layout. Where crossings of environmental features are required they are aligned such that disturbance to the features are minimized. The sanitary sewer and watermain crossings at Sharon Creek and Tributary 6, for instance, cross these features at the narrowest points possible. Combined with the use of silt fencing and other measures, the ecological function of these natural features will be maintained. SHARON SECTION 4.0 SERVICING The design and layout of Block lands urban services ensure functional efficiency and reliability while minimizing landform alterations and disruption to environmental features. Through the use of water distribution modeling, the local water distribution system has been strategically planned to address areas of demand in a reasonable manner and ensure that the network will adequately service all areas of the Community. Malone Given Parsons Ltd. NAK Design Group MMM Group Page 4-57

SHARON SECTION 4.0 SERVICING Figure 4.1: Water Servicing Plan Page 4-58

SHARON SECTION 4.0 SERVICING Both water distribution and sanitary sewer systems have been designed with regard for the environment and the ecological functions of the Block lands, and are located whenever possible, within proposed rights of ways. Figure 4.2: Sanitary Servicing Plan Malone Given Parsons Ltd. NAK Design Group MMM Group Page 4-59

SHARON SECTION 4.0 SERVICING Figure 4.3: Stormwater Servicing Plan Page 4-60

4.4 Stormwater Management The storm drainage conveyance system will be a dual conveyance system (major and minor) whereby major storm drainage (infrequent events) will be conveyed on the surface, and the minor storm drainage (frequent events) will be conveyed via a pipe network to appropriate outlets. The proposed stormwater management system for the Sharon Village Block lands, illustrated in Figure 4.3, will employ conventional end-of-pipe treatment techniques. The system will consist of eight stormwater management ponds on the lands west of Leslie Street and four stormwater management ponds on the lands east of Leslie Street. Most of the facilities will be wet water quality improvement ponds. Two smaller, oil/grit separator systems will be established on the west lands. The location and design of the stormwater management system was focused on protecting the Block lands numerous watercourses and wetlands from the effects of development inside tributary areas and ensuring that these features continue to provide their ecological, aesthetic and hydrologic functions. The Stormwater Management policies and provisions of the Sharon Community Plan and LSRCA, in concert with the standards of the MOEE and the consideration of Best Management Practices, provide guidance on the required performance of the Stormwater Management strategy, including: Maintain natural drainage divides of the watersheds draining the community; Protection and enhancement of water quality and quantity; Maintain existing rates of groundwater infiltration; Minimize potential for impacts on wetlands, fish and fish habitat; and Integration of ponds with proposed land uses (i.e. open space and parkland). The SWM facilities on the Block lands have been generally aligned along the watercourses as much as possible to preserve stream and drainage flows. Each of the proposed wet ponds will feature a forebay and main treatment cell configuration designed to remove up to 83% of total phosphorous (80% of total phosphorus on lands east of Leslie Street) and 76% of the phosphate from its storm water source. Shading techniques will be used to mitigate increased thermal characteristics of storm water before its release into the watercourses. The overcontrol of flows and gradual release of stormwater (24 hour detention of the runoff from a 25 mm storm event) is incorporated into the SWM system to ensure water quantity and erosive effects in Sharon Creek are maintained at pre-development levels. Taken together, these measures will aid in minimizing the potential for impacts on wetland functions, watercourse habitats and vegetation and bank stability. Where possible, pond locations were integrated with other open space or recreational land uses such that green areas were maximized. Suitable trees and vegetation will be planted, where appropriate to maintain wildlife habitat and linkage functions of the lands that accommodate stormwater management facilities. SHARON SECTION 4.0 SERVICING The location and design of the stormwater management system was focused on protecting the Block lands numerous watercourses and wetlands from the effects of development inside tributary areas and ensuring that these features continue to provide their ecological, aesthetic and hydrologic functions. Malone Given Parsons Ltd. NAK Design Group MMM Group Page 4-61

SHARON SECTION 4.0 SERVICING Figure 4.4: Phasing Plan Page 4-62

4.5 Phasing and Staging Residential growth in Sharon Village is limited by both the availability of physical servicing infrastructure (e.g. pipes) required to deliver services, and the capacity of that infrastructure to convey water and wastewater to and from Lake Ontario. The servicing of Sharon is dependent on Regional and local infrastructure projects that will be completed in stages over the next 5 to 10 years, requiring residential growth in Sharon to occur in phases. The physical extension of the York Durham Sanitary Sewer (YDSS) to Sharon is required to provide an initial sewer servicing capacity to facilitate the first phase of growth in new areas of Sharon, anticipated to be completed by 2011. Water conservation methods are also being considered in new homes to reduce water use / waste beyond levels being achieved in the average home in York Region. Incorporation of these measures will likely result in additional residential dwelling units in each phase of growth. Beyond the initial capacity that will be made available by the YDSS, the Region is undertaking an environmental assessment study for the Upper York Sanitary Sewer (UYSS) to resolve downstream servicing constraints in the YDSS system. The completion of the UYSS will provide the remaining sanitary servicing capacity necessary to accommodate planned growth in Sharon. In addition to using servicing capacity and allocation to determine the size of each phase of growth, it is also integral that each phase be a logical step towards the creation of the complete community of Sharon as described in this Block Plan. To ensure that growth occurs in a logical and cost effective manner, each phase of growth will address the following phasing principles: Minimize the separation of land uses; Ensure the cost effective and efficient extension of infrastructure; Provide for hard / community infrastructure necessary to support the early phases of growth in Sharon including: Collector roads, transit facilities, stormwater management facilities, water and sewer trunk lines, servicing trenches and utilities; Neighbourhood parks, school sites, institutional and commercial sites; Capital and financial contributions to the Town; and The natural heritage system. Encourge to the greatest extent possible that complete neighbourhoods are created in every phase of development; Require a high quality urban design in each phase, providing streetscape and public amenities as early as possible in the development process; Provide for a range of transportation choices and opportunities for Travel Demand Management (TDM) for new residents; and Provide a mix of land uses and housing types within the population and land use structure of this Block Plan. SHARON SECTION 4.0 SERVICING To ensure that residential growth occurs in a logical and cost effective manner, each phase of development will abide by several guiding phasing principles. Malone Given Parsons Ltd. NAK Design Group MMM Group Page 4-63

SHARON SECTION 4.0 SERVICING Figure 4.4 provides a phasing plan for the community of Sharon, identifying an area for Phase 1 that concentrates development west of the North-South Collector Road within the residential allocation provided by the extension of the YDSS, the allocation provided to Sharon by the Town and water conservation bonusing. The Phase 1 plan minimizes the separation of land uses by building whole neighbourhoods contiguous to the existing community to the greatest extent possible. The Phase 1 plan provides the hard / community infrastructure required to support growth and focuses development in areas with the potential to build both low and medium density housing types, in locations that will support the early delivery of transit service to the new areas of Sharon. The plan also allows for the delivery of streetscape and pubic realm elements identified in the Urban Design Guidelines and a list of complete community contributions to be agreed to with the Town. Growth beyond Phase 1 may occur in one or more phases within the phasing principles of this Plan, and will be addressed during the Draft Plan of Subdivision stage. Page 4-64

5.0 TRAFFIC AND TRANSIT 5.1 Road Plan The road network for the Block Plan generally conforms to the transportation goals and objectives of the Sharon Community Plan, Town of East Gwillimbury Official Plan and Region of York Regional Official Plan, including more efficient use of land, more efficient servicing and pedestrian oriented streets and neighbourhoods. The road plan is designed to integrate the functional requirements of these Plans with the aesthetic objectives for the community to create a safe, efficient and scenic road network. The road network is designed to accomodate the traffic generated by the nine distinct neighbourhoods separated by the valley system of Sharon Creek and its tributaries. These valleys are of significant environmental value to the block and their natural functions are best maintained by limiting intrusions, including roadways. As a result of the valley system and other environmental features, the road pattern is different from the traditional road system with mid-block collectors typical of other large blocks in York Region in that there is no opportunity for connection to 2nd Concession to the west. The other distinguishing element of the road system is the extensive use of cul-de-sacs. The challenging topography of the Block lands and the buffering requirements of environmental features require roads to be aligned in a manner that minimizes grade changes and the number of crossings over environmentally significant areas. A cul-de-sac is a more flexible form of road that enables housing to be sited in a manner that maintains and benefits from the topography. 5.2 Hierarchy and Function of Streets Figure 5.1 illustrates the structure of the street system and the hierarchy, function and characteristics of each street type. The characteristics and standards for each type are reviewed in the proceeding sections. Collector Roads Collector roads are intended to provide for safe and efficient connection between local and arterial roads. The Block Plan incorporates four collector roads. One major mid-block North-South Collector will service the west lands and provide direct access to Mount Albert Road. It is expected that this collector will be extended in the future north to Doane Road and south to Green Lane East, thereby connecting the community to Queensville and Newmarket, respectively. The remaining three minor collector roads will provide for efficient access to areas throughout the Block lands. The Block Plan acknowledges that the Region of York standards and criteria will dictate the intersection design with all Regional Roads, including Leslie Street and Mount Albert. SHARON SECTION 5.0 TRAFFIC AND TRANSIT The road plan is designed to integrate the functional requirements of the Sharon Community Plan, the Town of East Gwillimbury Official Plan, and the Region of York Regional Official Plan, with the aesthetic objectives for the community to create a safe, efficient and scenic road network. Malone Given Parsons Ltd. NAK Design Group MMM Group Page 5-65

SHARON SECTION 5.0 TRAFFIC AND TRANSIT Figure 5.1: Road Network Plan Page 5-66

The Town of East Gwillimbury regulates the design criteria for all municipal roadways. As illustrated in Figure 5.2, the North-South Collector Road will have a 26 metre right-ofway with two lanes of traffic, dividing medians, centre turn lanes in strategic locations and two 1.5 metre dedicated bike lanes. These lanes will provide cyclists with a safe means to utilize the roadway to access destinations or transit routes. The minor collector roads will have a 20-22 metre right-ofway and incorporate a designated on-road cycling route. Sidewalks are provided on both sides of all collector roads to facilitate the safe movement of pedestrians. SHARON SECTION 5.0 TRAFFIC AND TRANSIT The Town of East Gwillimbury regulates the design criteria for all municipal roadways, as well as the inclusion of bicycle lanes and sidewalks. Not to Scale Figure 5.2: Collector Road Cross-Section (26.0 m) NOTE: FOR 26.0m R.O.W.s WITH NO MEDIAN, THERE WILL BE AN ADDITIONAL 2.0m BOULEVARD ON THE OUTSIDE OF EACH SIDE. Malone Given Parsons Ltd. NAK Design Group MMM Group Page 5-67

SHARON SECTION 5.0 TRAFFIC AND TRANSIT Not to Scale Figure 5.3: Minor Collector Road with Bicycle Lane Cross-Section (20.0-22.0 m) Page 5-68

Local Roads The proposed system of local roads will serve the residential neighbourhoods, linking these areas to collector and arterial routes. As illustrated in Figure 5.4, local roads within the Block Plan will generally have an 18 metre right-of-way, whereas window streets will be developed to 15.5 metres. Sidewalks will be included on at least one side of all connecting local roads. Where local roads approximate the function of a collector road by providing access and service to schools, Neighbourhood Parks, or links walkways, bicycle paths, and open space areas, sidewalks will be provided on both sides. Traffic calming measures will also be incorporated, where appropriate, to ensure pedestrian safety. SHARON SECTION 5.0 TRAFFIC AND TRANSIT Not to Scale Figure 5.4: Local Road (Window Street) Cross-Section (18.0 m) Figure 9 18.0m Right of Way Local Road Malone Given Parsons Ltd. NAK Design Group MMM Group Page 5-69

SHARON SECTION 5.0 TRAFFIC AND TRANSIT Not to Scale Figure 5.5: Local Road Cross-Section (15.5 m) Page 5-70

5.3 Transit It is anticipated that frequent transit service will continue to be provided along Leslie Street and Mount Albert and that service will advance and be expanded in concert with development. Internally, transit is expected to utilize the major and minor collectors in the Block lands. This will provide a high level of transit accessibility that is consistent with the objectives and policies of the Region of York. Locations for future transit stops along these routes have been suggested on Figure 5.4. The siting of these stops maximizes the number of persons who will be within a 500 metres distance of a proposed transit stop. The majority of the planned residential population will be within 500 metre walking distance of a proposed transit stop. The walking distance has been calculated using likely pedestrian routes along sidewalks and roadsides where pedestrian ways are not present. 5.4 Transportation Demand Management Transportation Demand Management (TDM) is a general term for strategies that promote more efficient use of transportation resources. TDM emphasizes the movement of people and goods, rather than motor vehicles. The vision for the Block Plan incorporates the goals of being a sustainable and transit-supportive community. As no major development or expansion of rapid transit lines are planned for the community of Sharon, a TDM program is the best option, in combination with local bus service, to the meet the goals for a transit-supportive community. The development of the Block Plan will integrate significant elements of TDM to support and enhance transit, active transportation (bicycle and pedestrian), and reduced private vehicle trips, especially single-occupant vehicles. Several TDM strategies should be considered for Sharon, including: Setting up a website for new residents with transit information, carpool matching, bicycle / pedestrian information and links to Smart Commute; Providing a package of information about commuting and travel options and personalized travel planning to new residents; Exploring the potential for a car-share station within the Community; Ensuring that proper pedestrian links, bicycle parking and preferential carpool parking are incorporated; Providing bike racks on YRT buses and at major transit stops throughout the Community; Operating a shuttle bus to / from the East Gwillimbury GO Station on a trial basis; and, Maintaining a Commuter and TDM Information Board within community school and at primary community locations. The applicability for these strategies will be reviewed for their fit and appropriateness for the community of Sharon; the final TDM strategies will be formally determined and implemented in the Draft Plan of Subdivision stage. SHARON SECTION 5.0 TRAFFIC AND TRANSIT Frequent transit service will continue to be provided along Leslie Street and Mount Albert with an anticipated expansion of service occuring in concert with development. Malone Given Parsons Ltd. NAK Design Group MMM Group Page 5-71

SHARON SECTION 5.0 TRAFFIC AND TRANSIT Figure 5.4: Existing and Proposed YRT Transit Stops Page 5-72