PUBLICATION 2005:70. More Efficient North- South Communications in Greater Stockholm. A Concise Summary

Similar documents
PREPARED FOR: PLATTEVIEW ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

STOCKHOLM ROYAL SEAPORT

2 nd European Forum of Road Tunnel Safety Officers

The Village of Sugar Grove, in partnership with Kane County, the Illinois Department of Transportation, and the Illinois Tollway welcomes you to the

ICOMOS Technical Review. Phase II of HIA of Stockholm Bypass and Ekëro Road projects

SUMMARY. An Attractive, Competitive and Sustainable GREATER MONTREAL. Draft Metropolitan Land Use and Development Plan. April 2011

TOWN OF WHITBY REPORT RECOMMENDATION REPORT

The Illinois Department of Transportation and Lake County Division of Transportation. Route 173, including the Millburn Bypass

Eglinton West LRT Update

Q1 Report 2014/ September Klas Balkow CEO

Public Information Centre #1

Walkable cities, public space networks and river systems

RESOLUTION NO. R Refining the route, profile and stations for the Downtown Redmond Link Extension

9 CITY OF VAUGHAN OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO BOCA EAST INVESTMENTS LIMITED

Welcome. Walk Around. Talk to Us. Write Down Your Comments

Dresden s SUMP with broad citizen participation in the Dresden Debate

ROAD CLOSURE AND LAND USE AMENDMENT SILVER SPRINGS (WARD 1) NORTHEAST OF NOSEHILL DRIVE NW AND SILVER SPRINGS ROAD NW BYLAWS 2C2018 AND 29D2018

4. Good Practice Example: The SYMBIO-CITY Approach (Sweden)

Introduction. Who we are. Purpose of this public consultation

Caithness HVDC Switching Station Pre Application Consultation Event. August 2016

Exeriencies from the Livable City and. Integrated Transport and. Carl-Johan Engström, prof KTH. Urban Planning. other projects

Land Use Amendment in Southwood (Ward 11) at and Elbow Drive SW, LOC

Shift Rapid Transit Public Participation Meeting May 3, 2017

EARLY PICTURE OF THE WHOLE. Including landscape in long-term spatial planning

Heritage Impact Assessment

Guiding Principles for the SR 520 Replacement Project

Ryoko Iizuka Finance, Economics and Urban Department

POLICY AMENDMENT AND LAND USE AMENDMENT KILLARNEY/GLENGARRY (WARD 8) NW CORNER OF RICHMOND ROAD AND 33 STREET SW BYLAWS 1P2015 AND 7D2015

CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA

Urban Planning and Land Use

Urban Development and Planning in Vienna

The Dresden Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan (SUMP)

SWEDISH EDUCATION AND TRAINING ON CONCRETE BLOCK PAVEMENTS

IOWA HIGHWAY 57 / WEST 1 ST STREET STUDY PUBLIC INFORMATIONAL MEETING APRIL 22, 2014

TEHRAN LONG TERM URBAN RAIL PLAN

2002/ Modernisation Road N 4

I-84 Hartford Project Open Planning Studio #12. April 25, 2017

Newcourt Masterplan. November Exeter Local Development Framework

Scotswood to North Brunton improvement scheme

SBCAG STAFF REPORT. MEETING DATE: March 17, 2016 AGENDA ITEM: 5I

City of Cornwall Municipal Class Environmental Assessment. Proposed Improvement and Extension of Lemay Street

ARGENTA TRAIL (CSAH 28/63) REALIGNMENT SOUTH PROJECT (CP 63-25)

Networking for Urban Vitality Amsterdam, 23 June 2016

THE STILLWATER BRIDGE STORY

Evaluation Criteria. Detailed Evaluation Criteria

TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 (AS AMENDED).

Policy for management and protection of the coast

1.0 Purpose of a Secondary Plan for the Masonville Transit Village

Q4 Report 2013/ June Klas Balkow CEO

Strasbourg SUMP Award: Finalist factsheet. Local Transport facts. Urban transport policy objectives of the city:

COUNCIL ATTACHMENT 2 HIGHWAY 7 CORRIDOR AND VAUGHAN NORTH-SOUTH LINK

6 Growth Management Challenges and Opportunities

The Development of the Underground Infrastructure of the System of Mobility in Torino

Figure 5. Previously Identified Viable Corridors

Welcome. Northern Segment of Hwy 100 I-90 to South of Madison Street Meeting Goals:

Commissioners Road West Realignment Environmental Assessment

Welcome. Green Line LRT. Beltline Alignment Options. Stay engaged! Follow the Green Line story at calgary.ca/greenline

NEWSLETTER #03 BEAUDESERT ROAD LOGAN MOTORWAY

6:00 8:00 PM I-95 FROM EXIT 57 TO EXIT 60 PROJECT

SCARBOROUGH SUBWAY EXTENSION. Scarborough Subway Extension. Final Terms of Reference

PEOPLE S COMMITTEE OF HO CHI MINH CITY DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY FOR HO CHI MINH CITY S INFRASTRUCTURE

1. Introduction to Linköping

SDOT DPD. SDOT Director s Rule DPD Director s Rule DCLU DR SED DR of 7 CITY OF SEATTLE

Lake Macquarie City. A copy of the published amendment including the instrument and maps, is provided in Attachment 7 of this report.

Eastern Terminus TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM CENTRAL BROWARD EAST-WEST TRANSIT ANALYSIS BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

Bonaventure Project Full Submission. TAC 2018 Sustainable Urban Transportation Award

SCARBOROUGH RAPID TRANSIT ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT REPORT CHAPTER 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION. Table 2-4: North Segment Alignment Analysis 2-21

Thank you for coming. We want to hear your views on proposed improvements to the A1 between junction 65 (Birtley) and junction 67 (Coal House).

RIGA LATVIA. KEY FEATURES OF THE CITY Demographic Facts. Urban Figures. Heritage. EXISTING GOVERNANCE MECHANISMS Development and Management Plans

Route Planning and Environmental Assessment Study Highway 17 Four-Laning from Sudbury to Markstay GWP

Loop Detectors for Motorways

Scope of Services. River Oaks Boulevard (SH 183) Corridor Master Plan

(blank page) WestConnex New M Roads and Maritime Services Environmental impact statement

TOMORROW S SOLUTIONS TODAY

Lars Nyberg The Stockholm Parks Network & Sustainability Presentation at Porto Conference 10 November 2009

Green Line North Centre City Alignment

GOOD TOMORROW! SOLUTIONS FOR THE FUTURE

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

COMPONENT 4 Feasibility studies. Prague Suchdol

1.0 INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND

Atlanta BeltLine Corridor Environmental Study. Scoping Meeting August 2008

STAFF REPORT INFORMATION ONLY. Vacuum Waste Collection Systems SUMMARY. Date: March 19, Executive Committee. To: Deputy City Manager.

Outer Congress Street Land Use

WELCOME. This consultation at this early stage is an opportunity to share your comments and suggestions with us.

Inform you of the purpose and scope of the study for PTH 100 and a proposed future St. Norbert Bypass;

WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THE OPEN HOUSE?

GLEN ROAD PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT STUDY PUBLIC INFORMATION CENTRE #2 OCTOBER 24, 2017

Edmonton s LRT Setting the Stage for Heading Further South

Relief Line Project Assessment

Transportation Committee

master plan of highways

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Introduction

Agenda Standing Policy Committee on Infrastructure Renewal and Public Works January 31, 2013 REPORTS

To ensure that city planning achieves its desired impact, the City Plan identifies four focus areas in the outer city. Skärholmen, which has an

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

112th Avenue Light Rail Options Concept Design Report JUNE 2010 PREPARED FOR PREPARED BY TBG PGH

TOD 203 CORRIDOR PLANNING and TOD

SH 199 Corridor Master Plan. Community Meeting No. 2 May 31, 2017

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JUNE 7, 2016

Services Department B September 10, 2007

Transcription:

PUBLICATION 2005:70 More Efficient North- South Communications in Greater Stockholm A Concise Summary SEPTEMBER 2005

2 Foreword Stockholm, the capital of Sweden, is situated on a number of islands where the Baltic Sea meets Lake Mälaren. In the days when the predominant form of transportation was by sea, this location was of great advantage. Today however, it presents an obstacle for the development of the city and of the region as a whole. As early as the mid-1900 s a central ring road and an outer bypass were planned for Stockholm. Parts of this ring road Essingeleden, Södra Länken and Norra Länken are already in place, while a new link west of Stockholm on the outer bypass is still missing. The most recent link across Lake Mälaren Essingeleden was opened to traffic back in 1967. Since then Stockholm has grown by some 400 000 inhabitants and is expected to grow by another 600 000 inhabitants in the next three decades. This is why a new road link is essential to be able to cope with today s and tomorrow s demand for transportation. To create a new road link across, or in actual fact under Lake Mälaren west of Stockholm, is a vast and controversial project. This explains the great public interest aroused by the recently prepared preliminary design plan. To provide the international audience with a glimpse of the project, this summary of the summary has been translated into English. For those who understand Swedish, all the documents can be found on our website www. vv.se/nordsydlig. So far, the desired dialogue with those concerned has been intensive. At this point in time, I would appreciate it if this dialogue could be extended and continued at the international level. I would therefore be more than pleased if you would address any questions you might have to me personally in English, German or French. Stockholm, September 2005 Yours sincerely Johan Söderman Project Manager Title: More Efficient North-South Communications in Greater Stockholm Project manager: Johan Söderman, Swedish Road Administration, Stockholm Region Public relations officer: Gull-Britt Montalvo, Swedish Road Administration, Stockholm Region Consultant responsible for the preliminary design plan: Tyréns AB Author: Lena Norberg, Norberg Network Anders Markstedt, WSP Sverige AB Ingemar Thörnqvist, Tyréns AB Layout: Tecknar n i Roslagen Photo: Tyréns / WSP Sverige / Hans Ekestang / Miljöbild Document designation: Publication 2005:70 Publication: September 2005 ISSN: 1401-9612

3 Summary Preparing a preliminary design plan is a process in which various options are examined. Those options which do not result in a fulfilment of the set objectives, or which are technically, environmentally or economically unsuitable are ruled out one by one. Preliminary design plan terms of reference The terms of reference for the preliminary design plan were to find the road corridor which best resolves the following challenges: to connect the northern and southern parts of the region and to make travel possible between them without additional burden on Stockholmʼs central areas to create a by-pass for long distance traffic to improve the level of service on the Stockholm city access roads to improve the opportunities to create a common working and housing market for the whole region through equal accessibility to make possible a multicentric urban area to create conditions for development in a rapidly expanding region The preliminary design plan also examines whether the objectives can be realised through means other than road construction. Earlier investigations The idea of a north-south road link across the Saltsjö-Mälaren divide is not new, and can be found in all regional plans for Stockholm County. In connection with the Dennis Agreement on a Stockholm Ring Road at the beginning of the 1990s, different options for an outer bypass were also investigated. The work went as far as to the final design plan stage for the stretches between Kungens Kurva and Bergslagsplan and between Hjulsta and Häggvik. When the Dennis Agreement was discontinued in 1997, the financing conditions changed and the final design plans were not formally adopted. Transitional rules provided in the new Environmental Code meant that the entire Swedish Road Administration (SRA) planning process would have to be applied to projects except for those where a final design plan had already been adopted or an environmental impact assessment been approved by the County Administrative Board. Hence, when the subject of a north-south link once again came to the fore, a new planning round was initiated, beginning with a feasibility study (2001).

SUMMARY 4 The preliminary design plan The preliminary design plan contains three options: the Stockholm Bypass, the Ulvsunda Diagonal and the Combination Option. The Do Nothing Option is a reference option. THE STOCKHOLM BYPASS This runs from the E 4/E 20 European Highway at Kungens Kurva to Häggvik via Sätra, Kungshatt, Lovön, Vinsta, Lunda, Hjulsta. This route mostly goes through tunnels. At the crossing over the water at Lambarfjärden between Lovön and Grimstaskogen it goes by bridge and runs above ground by Hjulsta. THE ULVSUNDA DIAGONAL The Ulvsunda Diagonal runs on the E 4/E 20 European Highway at Kungens Kurva to Västertorp from where it continues by tunnel under Hägerstensåsen and Aspudden/Gröndal and on under Lake Mälaren, Stora Essingen and Äppelviken to Ulvsunda. From there it continues for a short stretch above ground, but at a lower down level through the Ulvsunda industrial area from which it continues by tunnel to the Kista interchange where it connects to the E 4. The parts of the E 4 / E 20 which are affected (Kungens Kurva to Västertorp and Kista to Häggvik) will be widened. There is a connection to Södra Länken at Aspudden. There are also connections to Enköpingsvägen and Ulvsundavägen north of Solvalla. THE COMBINATION OPTION The Combination Option comprises road improvements in the north-south axis Söderleden Klarastrandsleden Huvudstaleden as well as a new commuter train line Älvsjö Häggvik and quality improvements in the public transport system. The Combination Option presupposes road charging, which is intended to reduce and control road traffic. THE DO NOTHING OPTION The Do Nothing option means that the construction investments already contained in the regional development plan will be carried out with the exception of the Stockholm Bypass or the Ulvsunda Diagonal. The Do Nothing option is not shown on the map.

NORTH-SOUTH COMMUNICATIONS 5

6 SUMMARY In the case of the first two alternatives, a description is given of the corridors within which the ultimate alignment of the traffic route could be positioned. The local impact and impact on the traffic system within the entire region is also described. For the Combination Option however, only the regional changes are described. Needless to say, this option will also have a local impact, but the responsibility for the measures and improvements which need to be carried out lies not with the SRA but with municipalities and with the County Council as the body responsible for public transport. All the options have been assessed equally as to their potential for fulfilling the project objectives at the transport system level. The options must all meet present-day environmental and safety requirements, while also considering the conceivable requirements of tomorrow. The trend is that environmental issues are being given increasingly greater consideration, while time is becoming more and more precious. Fast and safe underground road systems in combination with environmentallyfriendly vehicles should make it possible to meet future requirements. Hence, a high standard is the ambition for the road construction options. The new road link is designed at motorway standard with three lanes in each direction of travel. The tunnels are housed in two separate tubes with a design speed of 90 km per hour. Basic data Stockholm Bypass Ulvsunda Diagonal Combination Option Road length, from Kungens Kurva to Häggvik 20.7 km 22.6 km 28.4 km Length of tunnels 16.0 km 13.6 km 20.0 km* Length of slip roads 11.3 km 15.0 km Number of lanes 6 6 Construction cost, at 2003 prices SEK 18-20 billion SEK 17-19 billion SEK 22-32 billion People travelling in morning rush hour across the Saltsjö Mälaren divide 112 000 people 112 000 people 108 000 people Total vehicle mileage 38 million vehicle 38 million vehicle 34 million vehicle in the region 2015 kilometres per day kilometres per day kilometres per day Total vehicle mileage 3.8 million vehicle 3.7 million vehicle 3.5 million vehicle in the inner city 2015 kilometres per day kilometres per day kilometres per day * Including the commuter train tunnel from Älvsjö to Häggvik and the Huvudsta tunnel. After referral for public viewing, one of the three options will be recommended by the SRA Once the plan has been referred for public viewing, all viewpoints have been analysed, and the County Administrative Board has issued its statement, the SRA will decide which option to present to the Government for consideration of permissibility. Whether this will be the Stockholm Bypass or the Ulvsunda Diagonal, the SRA estimates that construction would be able to commence in 2008 at the earliest and that it will take about 8 years to complete.

7 How do the various options fulfil the project objectives? Fulfi lment of objective Do Nothing Stockholm Ulvsunda Combination Option Bypass Diagonal Option Level of Service Accessibility Yes Yes No Saltsjö Mälaren divide Yes Yes No Central areas Yes Yes Yes Create a bypass Yes Yes No City access roads Yes Yes Yes Regional Structure Common market Yes Yes No Multicentrical Yes Yes No Economic Growth Conditions for development Yes Yes No Road Safety Fewer dead, seriously injured 0 + + ++ Gender Equality Improvements for women 0 0 + Environment Health 0 + + + Safety 0 + + 0/+ Nature, cultural environment, outdoor leisure 0 0 0 Climate targets 0 + Effective use of land and water 0 +/ + + Ditto, materials and energy 0 +/ Finances Construction 0 Operations and maintenance 0 Cost benefi t analysis 0 0/+ 0/+ 0/- The best option is marked with shading. The table above summarises how the various options fulfi l the specifi c project objectives (with a yes or no ). How they fulfi l the other objectives is assessed in relation to the Do Nothing Option and rated on a 5 grade scale using the following symbols: --, -, =, + and ++. The greatest change for the worse is indicated by -- and by ++ for the greatest change for the better. 0 means that the situation is unchanged in relation to the Do Nothing Option. Note that the various factors have differing weights and cannot be added together.

8 SUMMARY Corridors and road routes A preliminary design plan sets out suitable corridors for construction options. The corridor should be wide enough to enable the best choice of alignment in the final design plan. The corridor should not, however, be unnecessarily wide since the land within it becomes blocked from other use. A corridor can only be used to describe the general effect on the regional transport system, not for what will happen in the vicinity of the road. For this reason a road route is placed in the corridor given in the preliminary design plan. This road route later serves as the basis for an impact assessment and as such becomes an example of a possible solution within the corridor. Any future changes of the road route as the work progresses will not, however, change the basics in the proposed solution. Joint consultation During the progress of the work, there have been two major joint consultations: one in the autumn of 2002 and one in the spring of 2003. The first was arranged at the beginning of the work on the preliminary design plan when three possible road corridors from Kungens Kurva in the south to Häggvik in the north were being examined: the Stockholm Bypass, Ålstensleden and Brommagrenen. The purpose was primarily to get help from those living within the corridors and other stakeholders in order to collect all the factors relevant for continuing work on the preliminary design plan. The interest and response was enormous, with over 1 300 letters, e-mails and postcards sent in to the SRA, as well as two petitions: No to Ålstensleden and Protect Västerleden. By the time the second joint consultation was carried out, Brommagrenen and Ålstensleden had been removed from the investigation while a further option had emerged: the Ulvsunda Diagonal. An improvements option, Do Nothing Plus was also presented. The aim was then to gather viewpoints on the alternative road corridors and their impact on housing, nature and cultural areas, both during the construction period and once the road had been completed. More than 450 written responses were received at the SRA. The joint consultation has influenced the preliminary design plan as follows: A Combination Option with expanded public transport services and road charging has been given a more prominent place in the preliminary design plan. Environmental impact during the construction period has been studied more thoroughly. Construction materials will for the most part be transported through the end tunnel openings to avoid traffic conflicts and disruptions on the local road network. The Ulvsunda Diagonal Option emerged and afterwards given another connection to the E 4/E 20, where it would be less of a disturbance to those living nearby and at the same time have a better engineering design. More detailed studies have been conducted on long tunnel sections. Nothing emerged to indicate that it would be less safe to drive in tunnels than on normal motorways. Two versions of the Lovön Interchange were designed to reflect different assessments of the cultural interest. For the bridge over Lambarfjärden, two alternatives were presented with heights of 26 metres and 18 metres respectively. On this, the preliminary design plan stated a preference for the higher option. A special study was conducted on the effects of road charging. The result, together with a study of the effects of increased public transport, has been incorporated into the considerations. Information in addition to the consultation Throughout the course of the work on the preliminary design plan, meetings have been held on a continual basis with the County Administrative Board and the local authorities concerned. Meetings with those specifically affected have been arranged on various separate occasions. The general public was given information via a mobile bus exhibition in autumn 2003.

9 How will the work process continue? The preliminary design plan will be referred for public viewing from June to September 2005. The opinions received will be compiled and commented on before the County Administrative Board issues its statement. During the autumn of 2005 the SRA Stockholm Region will propose the option it considers most suited to the purpose. This option will be referred to the Government for consideration of permissibility. The planning process will then enter into a new phase and include the final design plan, construction documents and construction works. It will not be possible to start construction before the year 2008. The works are expected to continue for about 8 years. The North-South Communications process

Swedish Road Administration Stockholm Region SE-171 90 Solna, Sweden Street address: Sundbybergsvägen 1 www.vv.se vagverket.sto@vv.se Tel: +46 (0)771-119 119. Telefax: +46 (0)8-627 09 23. Text telephone: +46 (0)243-750 90