PDS June 1, 2016 Page 1. Planning and Development Committee. MEETING DATE: Wednesday, June 01, 2016

Similar documents
The protection of the agricultural resources of the Province;

NEW REGIONAL OFFICIAL PLAN HIGH LEVEL PROCESS & FRAMEWORK

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 15, 2016

240 and 242 Finch Avenue West Zoning By-law Amendment Application Preliminary Report

Official Plan Review: Draft Built Form Policies

Peel Region. Greenbelt Plan Conformity. Plan Review. Background & Approach

The Corporation of the Town of Milton

Elfrida Growth Area Study

9 CITY OF VAUGHAN OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO BOCA EAST INVESTMENTS LIMITED

Feasibility Analysis for Expansion of the Provincial Greenbelt Plan Area into Mississauga

Master Environmental Servicing Plan & Secondary Plan

SUBJECT: Revised proposed new official plan recommended for adoption

~!VAUGHAN NOV Z November 21, Mr. Denis Kelly, Regional Clerk The Regional Municipality of York Yonge Street Newmarket, ON L3Y 6Z1

150 Eighth Street Zoning By-law Amendment Application Preliminary Report

Cc~tporate Sers~ic:es

4. What are the goals of the Kawarthas, Naturally Connected project? 7. What are watersheds and why are they being used as the project boundaries?

Town of Newmarket 395 Mulock Drive P.O. Box 328, Newmarket, Ontario, L3Y 4X7. Website: newmarket.ca Phone:

CONSULTING SERVICES FOR THE WHITEBELT VISIONING EXERCISE ADDENDUM TO THE GTA WEST LAND USE STUDY WORK PROGRAM

3-2 Environmental Systems

THE GREENBELT ACT AND PLAN

Infrastructure, Development and Enterprise Services. Natural Heritage Action Plan (NHAP) Project Initiation

Subject: Identification and Confirmation Procedure for Areas of Natural and Scientific Interest Compiled by Branch Ontario Parks

OFFICIAL PLAN UPDATE PLANNING ACT SECTION 26

AMENDMENT NO. 30 TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN OF THE TOWN OF MILTON

1.0 Purpose of a Secondary Plan for the Masonville Transit Village

Report to: Development Services Committee Report Date: April 24, 2017

MAYFIELD WEST SECONDARY PLAN PHASE 2

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

TRCA Roles and Responsibilities in Planning and Development

Long Branch Neighbourhood Character Guidelines Final Report

1120 Haist Street - Pelham Arena Community Co-Design Recommendation Report Haist Street - Pelham Arena Community Co-Design Recommendation Report

South of Eastern Strategic Direction Status Update

Vaughan Metropolitan Centre (VMC) Black Creek Renewal CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

Official Plan Review

December 11, December 10, 2015

The Corporation of the TOWN OF MILTON

Central Lake Ontario Conservation Conservation Lands Master Plan

Report to: Development Services Committee Report Date: September 11, 2017

St. Lawrence Neighbourhood Focused Area - Official Plan Amendment Status Report

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF DECEMBER 10, 2013

MAYFIELD WEST SECONDARY PLAN PHASE 2

Services Department B September 10, 2007

TERRESTRIAL NATURAL HERITAGE SYSTEM STRATEGY APPENDIX F: MODEL POLICIES FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE TARGET TERRESTRIAL NATURAL HERITAGE SYSTEM

The Regional Municipality of Halton. Chair and Members of the Planning and Public Works Committee

and Richmond Street West - Official Plan Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

1 Introduction. Chapter. In this chapter:

OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLANS (OCPs) AND ZONING BYLAWS (ZBs): PLANNING FOR THE FUTURE

Planning Services Public Meeting Report

Planning Primer Legislative Background, Policy Documents and Development Review Processes. Presented by: Planning Services Date: April 6, 2017

Planning Department. Director of Planning. Manager of Planning. Planning Technician/ Sustainability Coordinator. Planner II/ Heritage Coordinator

Environment and Sustainability. Environment and Sustainability

APPENDIX F: EXTERNAL APPROVALS

Planning for the Future Urban Area. in north Markham. Update. Development Services Committee. December 9, De Development Services Committee

112 College Street Zoning Amendment Application Preliminary Report

Sustainable Growth. Sustainable Growth

Township of Adjala-Tosorontio Official Plan Review. Natural Heritage

; Office of the Regional Clerk

COMMUNITY SUSTAINABILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MASTER PLAN IMPLEMENTATION UPDATE

Phase I Ecological Network Report Terms of Reference

Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF DECEMBER 10, 2013

13 Extending the Esri Enterprise Licence Agreement

Humber Bay Shores Precinct Plan Final Report

Planning and Growth Management Committee. Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division. Pg12013 (File No NNY 34 OZ)

Town of Cobourg Heritage Master Plan. Statutory Public Meeting

Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District

OFFICIAL PLAN FOR THE TOWN OF NEW TECUMSETH

8 Oak Street - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Queen Street West - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Cultural Landscape Heritage Impact Statement Terms of Reference

Employment and Commercial Review Analysis of Policy Directions

VILLAGE OF BOLTON HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT PLAN

Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act 844 Don Mills Road and 1150 Eglinton Avenue East

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MAY 6, 2014

Toronto Complete Streets Guidelines

WELCOME Mayfield West Secondary Plan (Phase 2) Open House #2: June 25, 2009

Planning and Growth Management Committee

11.4 Highway 400 North Employment Lands Secondary Plan APPROVED BY THE ONTARIO MUNICIPAL BOARD ON NOVEMBER 21, 2011

Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property Roncesvalles Avenue

systems is available on the Colorado Wetland Information Center (CWIC) website.

Welcome. Walk Around. Talk to Us. Write Down Your Comments

Figure 1- Site Plan Concept

SUBJECT: New Official Plan Review: Rural, Natural Heritage and Sustainability Policy Directions

Chapter 4 - Preparation of Stormwater Site Plans

Town of Oakville Streetscape Strategy

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF WINDSOR Office of the City Solicitor Planning Department

Planning Reforms. Bill 51. Markham Implementation Strategy

Request for Decision. Recommendation. Presented: Monday, Jul 07, Report Date Friday, Jun 20, Type: Public Hearings

ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT

THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF PEEL BY-LAW NUMBER

SUBJECT: Waterfront Hotel Planning Study Update TO: Planning and Development Committee FROM: Department of City Building. Recommendation: Purpose:

Background Summary Report

Highlands Region Stormwater Management Program Guidance

PRIORITIES COMMITTEE MEETING

Rapid Transit Implementation Working Group September 14, 2017

Chair and Members of the Planning, Public Works and Transportation Committee. Tara Buonpensiero, Senior Planner Policy, MCIP, RPP

Cultural Heritage Landscape Heritage Impact Statement Terms of Reference

Land Use Amendment in Southwood (Ward 11) at and Elbow Drive SW, LOC

The West Vaughan Employment Area Secondary Plan Policies

THE STRUCTURE OF THE PLAN...

Transcription:

Page 1 REPORT TO: Planning and Development Committee MEETING DATE: Wednesday, June 01, 2016 SUBJECT: ROPA 12: Project Initiation Report Regional Official Plan Amendment (ROPA # 12) Watercourse Policies and Mapping RECOMMENDATIONS 1. That this report BE RECEIVED for information. 2. That a copy of this report BE CIRCULATED to the local area municipalities, the Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority and the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing. KEY FACTS The purpose of this report is to notify Regional Council that an amendment is required to update policies and mapping related to watercourses in the Regional Official Plan. The current environmental mapping is out-of-date and comes in a variety of scales, which can have a significant impact on landowners. Through Niagara Region s Greenbelt Plan review and the recent Provincial Coordinated Land Use Planning Review, Niagara Region identified the need for updated mapping and policies to address the balance between agriculture and natural heritage within the Greenbelt Plan. These updates will address the hindrances to agricultural viability that have been created through restrictive watercourse setback policies in the Greenbelt Plan. The Provincial Advisory Panel has also identified the need for these policies and mapping updates. The Niagara Region and the Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority have partnered on a project referred to as the Contemporary Mapping of Watercourses (CMW), which provides a database of spatially accurate watercourse locations and associated characteristics and information. This mapping has the ability to address these spatial and restrictive policy concerns. The Watercourse Mapping Project aligns with the Niagara Region Council Strategic Priority of Fostering Innovation, Investment and Entrepreneurship: Expedited process for development common platform of data Influence Provincial Plans ability to form policy from data selections

Page 2 CONSIDERATIONS Financial The cost of the work associated with this Amendment is included within the Planning and Development Services Department s budget for 2016. Any additional financial requirements resulting from this Amendment would be brought forward for Council consideration as they are identified. Corporate Regional Planning staff will work with other Departments and the Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority to ensure that all decisions made in relation to this amendment represent good planning. Governmental Partners Planning staff will consult and work collaboratively with local municipalities and the Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority during the development of the proposed Amendment. Provincial staff will also be engaged. Public and/or Service Users A copy of the Draft Amendments, schedules and all relevant materials will be made available for public input prior to the Statutory Public Meeting. ANALYSIS Background for Regional Official Plan Amendment #12 Throughout Ontario, the classification and mapping of watercourses is developed using different inventories and varying scales. Often, mapping cannot appropriately address the needs of the land use planning process, which has led to implementation problems related to development and management activities. In order to address these issues, the Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority (NPCA) and the Niagara Region have been working together to update a large scale surface water inventory for the Niagara watershed, known as the Contemporary Mapping of Watercourses project. This inventory can be used as a framework from which to assess characteristics of surface water features. Indicators of the environmental significance of a water feature can now be derived from characteristics such as flow regime, whether or not the feature has been constructed for drainage or irrigation purposes and the presence of fish habitat.

Page 3 In addition to the challenges imposed by inaccurate mapping, the Greenbelt Plan policies for watercourse setbacks have posed a challenge for Niagara. These policies are restrictive when applied as a blanket approach to all watercourses in Niagara. Despite distinct differences between form and function of various channels, namely those located in unique agricultural areas, all major watercourses are identified as Key Hydrologic Features (KHF). In the Greenbelt Plan under Section 3.2, KHFs are composed of permanent and intermittent streams, lakes (and their littoral zones), seepage areas and springs, and wetlands. Currently, Greenbelt Plan KHF policy applies to specialty crop areas where the majority of watercourses function as constructed drainage or irrigation ditches which in some cases have controlled flow. The Greenbelt Plan identifies a vegetation protection zone a minimum of 30 metres wide should be established from the outside boundary of a KHF. Greenbelt policies prohibit any development or site alteration in KHF s and any associated vegetation protection zones with few exceptions listed in section 3.2.4.1 of the plan. A constructed agricultural ditch/drain designated as a KHF creates a restrictive policy framework for farmland adjacent to these features. Landowners with multiple drains on their property are subjected to a large portion of land designated for natural buffer zones thus restricting their ability to manage or expand their operations. Additionally, landowners with small parcels may be unable to site farm infrastructure appropriately due to setback policies. Within the Greenbelt Plan, Natural Heritage Features, including fish habitat, receive the same level of protection as KHF. Recommendations that have been made by the Advisory Panel for the Provincial Coordinated Land Use Planning Review in their report, Planning for Health, Prosperity and Growth in the Greater Golden Horseshoe: 2015 2041, also support the Region s observations identifying a need for policy direction and accurate mapping in order to reduce the impacts of developmental setbacks on agricultural viability while maintaining the integrity of ecological features and functions. It is expected that new policies will be developed as part of the Provincial Co-ordinated Land Use Planning Review, which will support the work being proposed within this report. According to policies 7.A.2.3. and 7.B.1.7 of the Regional Official Plan, an amendment to the Regional Official Plan will be required to update the current mapping and policies related to watercourses. This amendment will involve revisions to Schedule C: Core Natural Heritage and policies within Section 7: Natural Environment. The proposed amendments to the Regional Official Plan will help to refine the current mapping of hydrological features throughout Niagara. Overview of Contemporary Mapping of Watercourses (CMW) Project The CMW project has been provincially identified as having the potential to create solutions for hardships caused by these setback policies.

Page 4 The data was compiled through an intensive analysis utilizing an updated 1 meter contour supporting Digital Terrain Model (DTM). Using aerial photography, digital elevation models, existing data sources and other tools, the data was comprehensively assessed. Hydrological characteristics were rooted into CMW inventory through strategic design considerations. Descriptive attributes, such as feature type, channel type, and flow regime have been identified and recorded for each watercourse in the dataset. Additionally, watercourse assessment and sensitivity indicating data was tagged into the CMW dataset, including OMAFRA constructed drain IDs, Ontario Hydro Network IDs and Ministry of Natural Resources Fish Habitat Types. The CMW data is capable of identifying physical and environmentally sensitive features of watercourses which, when used as criteria to differentiate features, can create subsets and/or categories of watercourses in order to create alternate setback options to KHF related policies, and also add context and strength to existing watercourse policies. The use of this data set at local and regional levels will create a common, comprehensive and operational information base to aid implementation of development and management activities related to surface water features in the Niagara Region. To date, the CMW has been completed for all twelve local municipalities. Staff from Niagara Region and the NPCA met with the local municipalities to inform them of the project and to share data wherever possible. The municipalities have already begun to use the draft mapping to support their own projects, including work related to stormwater quality master plans and official plans. Next Steps for Regional Official Plan Amendment #12 Staff have been working with the NPCA and the Town of Niagara-on-the-Lake to develop draft policies as part of the Town s Official Plan update; however, after further consideration, it was determined that the Region is the most appropriate organization to bring forward the initial amendment to the Province. To date, the Town has piloted an application of the mapping and proposed policies in their first draft of the Official Plan update. A consultant has been hired by the Town to carry out field work to verify the mapping for a small number of areas. While pilot work is been undertaken for Niagara-on-the-Lake, there are a number of considerations that need to be factored in to the policies and mapping. These considerations may include: Whether Regional policies should be more general than those piloted in Niagaraon-the-Lake; The geographic area that policies will be most appropriately applied to;

Page 5 Whether or not we need two sets of policies for Greenbelt and non-greenbelt areas; What mapping updates to the Regional Official Plan are most appropriate based on the updated data set; and The timing of the Regional official Plan Amendment in relation to Provincial updates to the Greenbelt Plan. Once the policies have been drafted, staff will work to develop a consultation plan and to determine whether or not further field work will be required. A plan will be developed in collaboration with the NPCA and the local municipalities to determine the scope of this work. Public and stakeholder consultation, in accordance with Section 17 of the Planning Act, will be required to make amendments to the Regional Official Plan. Additional public consultation will need to be aligned with the policy approach. The updated mapping and policy recommendations have been shared with the province as part of the Provincial Co-ordinated Land Use Planning Review, and comments from their review will aid in the formation of the amendment policies. ALTERNATIVES REVIEWED Failure to update the hydrologic mapping and policies of the Regional Official Plan will result in the continued use of out-of-date mapping of varying scale and policies that do not offer a solution to a provincially identified issue and the balance between agricultural opportunity and natural heritage will remain uneven. ORIGIN OF REPORT This report is being brought forward by staff. OTHER PERTINENT REPORTS PDS 11-2016 Crombie Task Force Report, February 17, 2016 PDS 22-2015 2015 Coordinated Policy Review Comment Submission ICP 78-2013 Watercourse Mapping Project, July 24, 2013 ICP 47-2013 Watercourse Mapping Project Recognition, June 12, 2013

Page 6 Original document is signed. SUBMITTED BY: Rino Mostacci, MCIP, RPP Commissioner Planning and Development Services Original document is signed. APPROVED BY: Maurice (Mo) Lewis Acting Chief Administrative Officer This report was prepared by Karen Costantini, Planner Analyst and reviewed by Katelyn Vaughan, Senior Planner, in consultation with Danielle DeFields, Manager Customer Service and Long Range Planning and Doug Giles, Director Community and Long Range Planning.