INFORMATION BULLETIN No. 150

Similar documents
BMA INFORMATION BULLETIN No. 97 FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT

Government of Bermuda Bermuda Shipping and Maritime Authority BERMUDA SHIPPING NOTICE

PROCEDURES FOR APPROVAL OF LIFE-SAVING APPLIANCES AND FIRE SAFETY SYSTEMS, EQUIPMENT AND PRODUCTS

IMO DEVELOPMENT OF MODEL PROCEDURE FOR EXECUTING SHIPBOARD EMERGENCY MEASURES. Fire-fighting drills. Submitted by the Republic of Korea

Amendments to the Revised Guidelines for the Maintenance and Inspection of Fire Protection Systems and Appliances (MSC.1/Circ.

Iranian Classification Society Convention and Legislation Department Code: Tech Contents

Attachment 1. to ClassNK Technical Information No. TEC-1077 Isle of Man Ship Registry Manx Shipping Notice SOLAS II-2 The Maintenance and inspection o

MAIB SAFETY BULLETIN 2/2010. Failure of fixed high expansion foam system to extinguish fire on board the passenger ferry Oscar Wilde

IMO LIST OF DOCUMENTS ISSUED IN CONNECTION WITH THE FORTY-SEVENTH SESSION OF THE SUB-COMMITTEE ON FIRE PROTECTION AGENDA FOR THE FORTY-SEVENTH SESSION

Notice on the implementation of the amendments to the FSS Code in resolution MSC.339(91)

MARINE GYRO COMPASS STANDARD FOR CERTIFICATION. DET NORSKE VERITAS Veritasveien 1, N-1322 Høvik, Norway Tel.: Fax:

International Water Mist Conference, Istanbul October 22-23, 2014 The background and development of the guidelines in IMO Resolution A.

ClassNK Technical Information No. TEC-0453 Attachment (1) to ClassNK Technical Information No. TEC-0453 Guidance on SOLAS Chapter II-2 as amended in 2

MAINTENANCE AND INPSECTION OF FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS AND APPLIANCES

RADAR REFLECTOR STANDARD FOR CERTIFICATION. DET NORSKE VERITAS Veritasveien 1, N-1322 Høvik, Norway Tel.: Fax:

GROUNDING AVOIDANCE SYSTEM (GAS)

MGN 453 (M) Maritime and Coastguard Agency Logo MARINE GUIDANCE NOTE

ClassNK Technical Information No. TEC-0838 (iii) The dormant period, visual indication, first stage audible alarm, second stage remote audible alarm a

SHOP PRIMERS FOR CORROSION PROTECTION OF STEEL PLATES AND SECTIONS

IMO FP 53 Report. Lloyd s Register report on the 53 rd session of IMO Fire Protection Sub-Committee. 16 th March, 2009

Attachment 1. to ClassNK Technical Information No.TEC-0764 Malta Maritime Authority Date Revised 28 August 2008 Page 1 of 10 This Administration Requi

Requirements for ships carrying hydrogen and compressed natural gas vehicles

Guidance from the Group of Notified Bodies for the Construction Products Regulation 305/2011/EU

UNIFIED INTERPRETATION OF PROVISIONS OF IMO SAFETY, SECURITY, AND ENVIRONMENT-RELATED CONVENTIONS

ClassNK Technical Information No. TEC-0970 For any questions about the above, please contact: NIPPON KAIJI KYOKAI (ClassNK) Survey Department, Adminis

MSC Guidelines for Watermist Fire Suppression Systems Procedure Number: E1-03 Revision Date: 02/16/2017

IMO WORK PROGRAMME. Central control stations and safety centres on passenger ships. Submitted by Argentina and ICCL

Government of Bermuda Department of Maritime Administration BERMUDA SHIPPING NOTICE

Technical Information

SOUND RECEPTION SYSTEM

MARINE CIRCULAR MC-7/2011/1

IMO UNIFIED INTERPRETATIONS TO SOLAS CHAPTER II-2 AND RELATED FIRE TEST PROCEDURES

Circuit Breakers JANUARY The electronic pdf version of this document found through is the officially binding version

Australian Standard. Water mist fire protection systems System design, installation and commissioning AS

IMO FP 54 Agenda Preview (Updated version)

Approval of water mist systems in buildings

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU)

Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Prevention Bureau Standard

Interferry Ro Ro Deck Fire Safety Operational Best Practice Guidance

EC TYPE EXAMINATION CERTIFICATE

PQS Independent type-testing protocol

Circular. Maintenance and Inspection of Fire-Protection Systems and Appliances

Pressure Equipment Directive PED 2014/68/EU Commission's Working Group "Pressure"

SECTION : FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS

IMO MSC 94 Summary Report on Polar Code

NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY PROJECT NAME JOB # ISSUED: 03/29/2017

DRY CHEMICAL POWDER SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS TO COMPLY WITH THE LATEST IMO IGC CODE AND EUROPEAN COUNCIL CLARIFICATIONS

REPUBLIC OF LIBERIA BUREAU OF MARITIME AFFAIRS

IMO COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF THE FIRE TEST PROCEDURES CODE

IMO. Resolution A.952(23) Adopted on 5 December 2003 (Agenda item 17) GRAPHICAL SYMBOLS FOR SHIPBOARD FIRE CONTROL PLANS

RULES OF DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND INSURANCE DIVISION OF FIRE PREVENTION CHAPTER FIRE PROTECTION SPRINKLER SYSTEM CONTRACTORS

4 June This circular supersedes MSC/Circ.914. *** I:\CIRC\MSC\01\1272.doc

For the Design, Installation, Commissioning & Maintenance of Fire Detection and Fire Alarm Systems

Notice No. 7. Rules and Regulations for the Classification of Ships, July Issue date: March Working together for a safer world

THÔNG BÁO KỸ THUẬT TÀU BIỂN TECHNICAL INFORMATION ON SEA-GOING SHIPS

Only the Danish version is authentic Notice D II-2 N(2) 1 October 2002 CHAPTER II-2 N(2)

Effectiveness of sprinklers in residential premises:

CERTIFICATE OF FIRE APPROVAL

TECHNICAL ALERT No

GK/GN0612. Guidance on Signalling Lockout Systems to Protect Railway. Undertaking Personnel. Railway Group Guidance for GK/RT0212.

26 June 2001 GUIDELINES ON ALTERNATIVE DESIGN AND ARRANGEMENTS FOR FIRE SAFETY

EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 7 April 2009 (OR. en) 2007/0257 (COD) PE-CONS 3710/08 MAR 200 CODEC 1496

CERTIFICATE OF FIRE APPROVAL

IACS RESOLUTION CHANGES (GMO ) BEKİR SITKI TÜRKMEN

IMO Resolution MSC 61 (67) 1996; Annex 1, Part 2. Smoke & Toxicity Test. WF Report Number: Date: 13 th August Test Sponsor:

Title: Room-sealed fanned draught flue systems concealed within voids

INTEGRATED LIFE SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING AND ITS PROCEDURES

Shipboard incinerators with capacities up to 4000 kw

PART 3-O REQUIREMENTS FOR SPRINKLER SYSTEMS MAINTENANCE AND SUPERVISION. 3-O Introduction O.1 Scope of Maintenance and Supervision...

IMO GUIDELINES ON THE LAYOUT AND ERGONOMIC DESIGN OF SAFETY CENTRES ON PASSENGER SHIPS. Submitted by the Cruise Lines International Association (CLIA)

DNVGL-CP-0398 Edition December 2015

THE REPUBLIC OF LIBERIA LIBERIA MARITIME AUTHORITY

DRAFT NFPA 805 TRANSITION PILOT PLANT OBSERVATION GUIDANCE

IMO CCC1 Summary Report on the developments of the IGF Code

THE REPUBLIC OF LIBERIA LIBERIA MARITIME AUTHORITY

MSC Guidelines for General Emergency Alarm & Public Address Systems

PQS Independent type-testing protocol

RESOLUTION MSC.217(82) (adopted on 8 December 2006) AMENDMENTS TO THE INTERNATIONAL CODE FOR FIRE SAFETY SYSTEMS

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

Technical Information

Glass fibre rovings - Non-metallic materials

IMO FP 53 Agenda Preview

GUIDELINES FOR THE APPROVAL OF HELICOPTER FACILITY FOAM FIRE-FIGHTING APPLIANCES

Attachment 1. to ClassNK Technical Information No.TEC-0960 REPUBLIC OF CYPRUS MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATIONS AND WORKS File: DMS 1.5 & DMS Circul

IMO. 4 June 1999 GUIDELINES FOR THE APPROVAL OF ALTERNATIVE FIXED WATER-BASED FIRE-FIGHTING SYSTEMS FOR SPECIAL CATEGORY SPACES

MSC Guidelines for Automatic Sprinkler Systems

Health and Safety Documents in connection with offshore oil and gas operations

IMO INTERPRETATIONS OF FIRE PROTECTION-RELATED PROVISIONS OF THE HSC CODE

Health and Safety Policy. Version Author Revisions Made Date 1 Colin Campbell First Draft March 2014

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY DIVISION OF FIRE PREVENTION AND CONTROL

Indicators for Rudder Angle, Rate of Turn, Propeller Shaft Revolution and Propeller Pitch

C-NRPP Quality Assurance Guidance for Radon Test Devices

REVISED GUIDELINES FOR THE DESIGN AND APPROVAL OF FIXED WATER-BASED FIRE-FIGHTING SYSTEMS FOR RO-RO SPACES AND SPECIAL CATEGORY SPACES

***** 2. Rev.1 is to be uniformly implemented by IACS Members from 1 July 2004.

RESOLUTION MSC.101(73) (adopted on 5 December 2000) ADOPTION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE INTERNATIONAL CODE FOR APPLICATION OF FIRE TEST PROCEDURES

RESOLUTION MSC.339(91) (adopted on 30 November 2012) AMENDMENTS TO THE INTERNATIONAL CODE FOR FIRE SAFETY SYSTEMS (FSS CODE)

On Electromagnetic Compatibility

F-03 FIXED FIRE DETECTION AND FIRE ALARM SYSTEM

COMPETENCE. Lead Fire Warden. Standard Title Lead Fire Warden Competence Assessment Standard Lead Fire Warden Competence Assessment Standard

L-08 LIFEBOAT RELEASE MECHANISM

Transcription:

Bulletin. 150 Revision. 01 Issue Date 19 Aug 2014 Effective Date 25 Aug 2014 INFORMATION BULLETIN. 150 Inspection and Testing of Automatic Sprinkler Systems. Guidance and Instructions for Bahamas Recognised Organisations, Bahamas Approved Nautical Inspectors, Ship Owners, Managers and Masters 1. Purpose 1.1. This Bulletin is intended to provide guidance on the testing requirements for Automatic Sprinkler Systems. 2. Application 2.1. This Bulletin applies to all Bahamian ships fitted with Automatic Sprinkler Systems, as required by SOLAS Regulations II-2/10.4, II-2/10.5 & II- 2/10.6, or other IMO Codes such as the International Code of Safety for High Speed Craft 1994 or 2000 (HSC Code). 2.2. This Bulletin does not apply to dry pipe water based fixed local application fire-extinguishing systems meeting the requirements of SOLAS Regulation II-2/10.5.6 or dry pipe systems as defined in Resolution MSC.44(65). 3. Definitions 3.1. For the purpose of this Bulletin the following definitions are used, unless expressly provided otherwise: i) Automatic Sprinkler Systems sprinkler & water-spraying systems required by SOLAS Regulations II-2/10.4, II-2/10.5 and II- 2/10.6 or HSC Code. This includes fixed pressure water mist systems and water spray systems. Page 1 of 13

ii) iii) Sprinkler means sprinkler heads, water mist nozzles or water spray nozzles as applicable to the system in question. Annual Survey unless stated otherwise in this document, means Cargo Ship Safety Equipment Annual, Periodical and Renewal Surveys; HSC Code Periodical and Renewal Surveys and Passenger Ship Safety Certificate Renewal Surveys; and, for other Codes which either refer to SOLAS Regulations II-2/10.4, II-2/10.5 & II- 2/10.6, or require similar such systems, their applicable Annual, Intermediate, Periodical or Renewal Surveys. iv) Pilot Pressure The minimum operating pressure of the Automatic Sprinkler System as defined in the maker s manual or Type Approval Certification. This may also be referred to as standby pressure by some manufacturers. v) Operating Pressure The actual pressure, during Extended testing, at which the sprinkler operated when the pressure is raised from Pilot Pressure on sprinklers that failed to operate at Pilot Pressure. 4. Background 4.1. Since the introduction of BMA Information Bulletin.150 Rev.0 in August 2013, testing has been carried out on a number of different makes of Automatic Sprinkler System. The testing has found failures on both high pressure and low pressure Automatic Sprinkler Systems produced by a number of different manufacturers. Failures have occurred exclusively on ships over 5 years of age. 4.2. Due to the severity of these findings and the need to determine the extent of these failures, the Bahamas Maritime Authority (BMA) has decided to instigate increased testing for Bahamian ships fitted with Automatic Sprinkler Systems. This revision of Bulletin.150 takes into account the findings related to failures on both high pressure and low pressure systems. 4.3. The extent of testing required is dependent on the age of the Automatic Sprinkler System. Testing consists of: Initial testing of two sprinklers; Basic testing of 20 sprinklers to assess the general condition of the system; and, Extended testing, where it is necessary to obtain a more detailed assessment of the condition of the system through testing an increased sample size of sprinklers. Page 2 of 13

5. Maintenance of Automatic Sprinkler Systems 5.1. Companies 1 operating Bahamian ships shall ensure that the relevant parts of MSC.1/Circ.1432 and manufacturer s inspection and maintenance instructions for Automatic Sprinkler Systems are incorporated into their Safety Management System. 5.2. The BMA recommends that Automatic Sprinkler System water quality be assessed through periodic sampling and analysis in accordance with the manufacturer s instructions. 5.3. Records of Automatic Sprinkler System water quality should be maintained for monitoring purposes to ensure that any deterioration in water quality is identified and to reduce the possibility of damage to sprinklers resulting in failure to operate. Base line water quality should be established at the following times: Prior to the delivery of the ship from the building yard but, after all installation testing has been completed; Whenever the system is flushed and re-filled with water in accordance with manufacturer s maintenance instructions or after operation/testing. 6. Instructions to Recognised Organisation surveyors 6.1. Testing 6.1.1. As a general guide these requirements will be applicable to ships holding a Passenger Ship Safety Certificate, Special Purpose Ship Certificate or High Speed Craft (HSC) Code Certificate. However, it is the responsibility of Recognised Organisations and their surveyors to identify the applicability of these requirements to each Bahamian ship. It is suggested that Recognised Organisations make reference in the survey records for each ship to which these requirements may apply to remind their surveyors of these requirements. 6.1.2. Annex I to this Bulletin gives detailed testing requirements and acceptance criteria. 6.1.3. All Initial and Basic testing shall be conducted on board during the Annual Survey in the presence of a Recognised Organisation surveyor. 6.1.4. Extended testing shall be conducted on board during the Annual Survey in the presence of a Recognised Organisation surveyor, except where shore- 1 The Company is the entity responsible for the management of the ship in accordance with the ISM Code. For ships which the ISM Code is not applicable, the Company is the Managing Owner in accordance with Section 52 of the Bahamas Merchant Shipping Act. Page 3 of 13

side testing may be accepted by the BMA as per section 6.2 of this Bulletin. 6.1.5. Testing on passenger ships may be commenced up to three (3) months ahead of the start of the PSSC Renewal Survey window. This testing may still be credited towards the subsequent Renewal Survey provided all testing is completed by the PSSC Renewal due date. 6.1.6. Testing on all other ship types is to be completed within the Annual Survey window. 6.1.7. Annual Surveys shall not be considered complete until all testing has been completed. 6.1.8. The Company and Recognised Organisation shall ensure that all necessary testing is completed without any detriment to the extent of survey of other survey items forming part of the Annual Surveys. 6.1.9. Postponement of testing past the end of the survey window will normally only be considered by the BMA in force majeure circumstances. 6.2. Testing at shore side facilities 6.2.1. If, in exceptional cases, it becomes impracticable to do the entire Extended testing on board, it may be possible to conduct testing ashore by sending the remaining sprinklers to a shore side testing facility. 6.2.2. For Extended testing to be carried out at a shore side testing facility, the Recognised Organisation must submit a fully justified proposal including identification of the testing facility in accordance with BMA Information Bulletin.8. Measures to meet the requirements of paragraphs 6.2.3 & 6.2.4 below are also to be addressed in the proposal. 6.2.3. The following requirements are to be in put in place for shore side testing: All testing at shore side facilities is to be carried out under full supervision of an RO surveyor; The traceability of the sprinklers shall be maintained throughout the removal/shipping/testing process in such a way that the sprinklers are clearly identifiable with respect to their original position on board; Custody of the sprinklers shall be controlled in such a way that there can be no suggestion that the sprinklers may have been tampered with prior to testing, or that the testing has been incorrectly carried out; Sending of sprinklers direct to the manufacturer for unsupervised inhouse testing is not acceptable. Page 4 of 13

6.2.4. Where the shore side test facility is not that of the Automatic Sprinkler System manufacturer, the details of the test rig and testing procedures shall be reviewed by the Recognised Organisation and confirmed to the BMA as accurately simulating the system on board the vessel. 6.3. Replacement of sprinklers 6.3.1. Where test results indicate that it is necessary to replace all sprinklers in some or all sections on board, the relevant requirements of Annex I are to be followed. 6.3.2. Sections where all Sprinklers have been replaced are to be regarded as new installations and testing in subsequent years is to be conducted as appropriate for the age of the sprinklers at the next Annual Survey. 6.3.3. Details of sections where all sprinklers have been replaced are to be maintained by the ship owner and Recognised Organisation to ensure the appropriate testing is conducted at each subsequent Annual Survey. 6.3.4. If there is any doubt as to the extent of testing to be carried out on ships where all Sprinklers have been replaced in a section, the scope of testing may be agreed with the BMA s Inspections and Surveys Department. 6.4. Reporting requirements 6.4.1. All Basic and Extended testing is to be reported using the spreadsheet provided to all Bahamas Recognised Organisations for use by surveyors carrying out annual Surveys on Bahamian ships fitted with Automatic Sprinkler Systems. 6.4.2. The completed spreadsheet is to be reviewed by the Recognised Organisation against the appropriate acceptance criteria in Annex I to determine what further action, if any, is to be taken. 6.4.3. Once the action required is determined by the Recognised Organisation, the BMA is to be advised. The submission to the BMA should include the following information: Identification of the ship; Details of the Automatic Sprinkler System(s) on board (make, type, etc.); Photographs showing examples of the Sprinkler Heads fitted on board; Photographs of examples of any Sprinkler Heads which failed testing; A written summary of test results; A copy of the spread sheet; The Recognised Organisation s recommendations for further testing or sprinkler replacement and conditions for issuance of short term certification, as appropriate; and, Page 5 of 13

The Company s intentions for completion of further testing or replacement of sprinklers, as appropriate. 6.4.4. If deemed necessary, the BMA may require the test results to be shared with the system manufacturer and/or the body responsible for issuing the Type Approval Certification for further investigation or comment. 6.5. Short Term Certification 6.5.1. Where the test results require further testing or replacement of sprinklers, the Recognised Organisation is to request permission from the BMA to issue relevant short-term certification, in accordance with BMA Information Bulletin.8. 7. Revision History Rev.1 (18 August 2014) General revision, Consolidation of testing requirements, inclusion of Initial testing and testing flow charts in Annex I. Rev.0 (02 August 2013) First issue Page 6 of 13

Annex I - Test Procedures Introduction. 1. In general only one type of Automatic Sprinkler System will be installed on a ship to which this Bulletin applies. However, there are some ships where Automatic Sprinkler Systems from different makers are installed or different types of sprinklers from the same maker installed (e.g. Marioff Hi-Fog 1000 and Hi-Fog 2000 sprinklers, or Marioff Hi-fog and another proprietary brand). 2. If more than one type of sprinkler is installed on board a ship to which this bulletin applies, then the different types of sprinkler are to be assessed separately against the requirements of this Bulletin. 3. The starting point for testing, based on age of system, is shown in table 3 below. Age of System <5 years Initial Testing 5 years Basic Testing Table 3. Starting point for testing based on system age. Initial testing 4. Test a minimum of two sprinklers for proper operation at pilot pressure as per MSC.1/Circ.1432, Paragraph 7.5.17. 5. Water quality is to be assessed as per paragraph 26, below. 6. The test results shall be recorded in accordance with section 6.4 of BMA Information Bulletin.150 and assessed against paragraph 7 below. Initial testing acceptance criteria 7. If one or both of the sprinklers tested fail to operate at pilot pressure then proceed to Basic testing. Basic testing 8. The purpose of Basic testing is to determine the general condition of the Automatic Sprinkler System and consists of testing of a limited number of sprinklers and taking water samples from the system. 9. Basic testing is to be carried out at the system s pilot pressure. Page 7 of 13 Annex I

10. Two sprinklers in 10 sprinkler sections should be tested (20 sprinklers in total). The test samples should be taken from different areas of the ship. For consistency, it is important that two sprinkler tests are recorded and documented from each tested section. 11. If there are less than 10 sprinkler sections installed on board then testing should be 2 sprinklers per section on board. The BMA shall be consulted on the acceptance criteria to be applied in such cases. 12. Water samples are to be taken in accordance with paragraphs 26 & 27 below and assessed against paragraph 30 and where necessary the system dealt with as per paragraph 32. 13. The test results shall be recorded in accordance with section 6.4 of BMA Information Bulletin.150 and compared to the acceptance criteria defined in paragraphs 14, 15 & 16 below. Basic testing acceptance criteria 14. If 0, 1 or 2 ( 10%) of the sprinklers fail to operate at the pilot pressure, no further action is required and the situation will be monitored by new tests at the next Annual Survey. 15. If three or more sprinklers out of the 20 sprinklers tested fail (>10%) an Extended testing programme in accordance with paragraphs 18,19, 20, 21 & 22 below should be initiated 16. In the special case of 2 sprinklers from the same sprinkler section failing, it should be ensured that the remaining sprinklers in the same section are not impaired. Typically, an additional 10 sprinklers should be tested in the same section. If 2 or more of the additional sprinklers fail the test, the section is to be deemed contaminated and all sprinklers within that section should be replaced. 17. Where Extended testing of the Automatic Sprinkler System is necessary, any sections which have been subject to and passed the additional testing referred to in Paragraph 16 do not require to be subject to Extended testing and will be monitored at the next Annual Survey. Extended testing 18. The purpose of Extended testing is to determine in more detail either the general condition of the Automatic Sprinkler System or the condition of each individual sprinkler section. Based on the results of the test a decision can be made whether sprinkler sections may be left in service or whether replacement is needed. 19. Based on the results from Basic testing the following Extended test programme in Table 19 is implemented: Page 8 of 13 Annex I

Case Failure rate, R FB, from Number of sprinklers to be tested. Basic testing i 10% <R FB 20% 2 sprinklers to be tested from sprinkler sections selected as follows: If number of sections <20, test all sections; If number of sections is between 20 and 40, test 20 sections; If number of sections >40, test 50% of the sections. ii R FB>20% 7 sprinklers from each sprinkler section. All sprinkler sections to be tested except for sections where the Company prefers to replace all sprinklers at this stage. Table 19 Extended testing requirements. 20. Extended testing is carried out at pilot pressure. In cases where sprinklers fail to operate at pilot pressure the actual opening pressure shall be ascertained but in no circumstances shall the sprinkler be tested to a pressure greater than the maximum operating pressure of the system identified by the system manufacturer. 21. Water samples are to be taken in accordance with paragraphs 26 & 29 and assessed against paragraph 30 and where necessary the system dealt with as per paragraph 32. 22. The test results shall be recorded as per section 6.4 of Bulletin.150 and checked with regard to the acceptance criteria in paragraphs 23, 24 & 25. Extended testing acceptance criteria 23. A case by case review should always be carried out taking into account the failure rate at the pilot pressure, the actual opening pressure, number of sprinklers within the protected spaces in question (e.g. only 1 sprinkler installed being more critical than 20), number and percentage of sprinklers tested in the section in question and water quality. 24. Case i (from Table 19): If 10% of all sprinklers tested failed to operate at the pilot pressure, no further action is required and the situation will be monitored by new tests at the next Annual Survey (but see paragraphs 27, 28 & 29 below). Page 9 of 13 Annex I

In the special case of 2 sprinklers from the same sprinkler section failing, it should be ensured that the remaining sprinklers in the same section are not impaired. Typically, an additional 10 sprinklers should be tested in the same section. If 2 or more of the additional sprinklers fail the test, the section is to be deemed contaminated and all sprinklers within that section should be replaced. If >10% of all sprinklers tested fail to operate at the pilot pressure the test programme should be expanded to the extent required by Table 19, case ii. 25. Case ii (from Table 19): Each section is assessed and for sections with a failure rate 15%, no further action is required and the situation will be monitored by new tests at the next Annual Survey. For sections with a failure rate > 15%, all sprinklers within that section should be replaced. Alternatively, if the number of sprinklers tested in that particular section represents less than 10% of all sprinklers installed in this section, further testing limited to 30% of the total number of sprinklers in that section may be carried out and the results can be reassessed with all sprinklers tested in that section being considered. The acceptance criterion still remains a failure rate 15%. Water samples 26. It is recommended that water samples are taken from the sprinkler tank, pump unit and relevant sections (as close as practicable to the sprinkler as this represents the water in the branch pipe). 27. If only Initial testing is required, on-board water quality records are to be reviewed against system manufacturer s water quality requirements and random verification samples to be taken if deemed necessary. 28. If only Basic testing is required, the samples can be taken and analysed on board by the crew. 29. If Extended testing is required, it is recommended that a test laboratory is employed for the analysis of the water samples. Water sample acceptance criteria 30. The water quality shall be assessed against the system manufacturer s water quality requirements and should address, as a minimum: ph; Page 10 of 13 Annex I

chloride content; Conductivity of the water. Water test results shall be reported to the BMA in accordance with section 6.4 of BMA Information Bulletin.150. 31. It must be remembered that the water may have been exchanged and that the system may have been charged with better or worse water in the past. 32. For any water samples found not to be in compliance with the manufacturer s recommendations for water quality, replenishment of the water in the tanks and thorough flushing of all pipes in the affected sections shall be conducted. It is of the utmost importance that the manufacturer s water specifications are followed in order to prevent progressive damage to sprinklers. Replacement of Sprinklers 33. If replacement of all sprinklers in a section is required, care shall be taken to ensure that all contaminated water is drained from the piping. 34. Sprinklers shall be removed from all branch piping and all piping shall be blown through with air, or flushed properly with water complying with the manufacturer s recommendations. 35. Replacement sprinklers shall be of the correct type and approved for use in the system. Unapproved modifications to the system or sprinklers will render the system s Type Approval invalid. 36. Where extensive replacement of sprinklers is required a replacement plan shall be submitted to the BMA by the RO, in accordance with paragraph 6.4.3 of BMA Information Bulletin.150. Page 11 of 13 Annex I

Annex II Test Procedure Flow Charts Initial and Basic Testing Start Initial Testing. Test 2 Sprinklers of each type installed on board in accordance with MSC.1/Circ.1432. Have the Sprinklers been installed on the ship for 5 years or more? te: 1) All Initial and Basic testing is to be carried out at pilot pressure. 2) Water quality is to be assessed in accordance with the requirements of Annex I of Bulletin.150 3) Where the testing results require sprinkler replacement the recommendations on replacement of sprinklers in Annex I of Bulletin.150 should be followed. Did one or more sprinklers fail? Basic Testing. Test 2 sprinklers per section in 10 sections (20 sprinklers in total). Assess test results against acceptance criteria for Basic testing Are there any sections where both sprinklers tested failed? For the sections where both sprinklers tested failed undertake additional testing of a further 10 sprinklers per section. Proceed to Extended testing Did 3 or more out of 20 sprinklers fail? Assess test results against acceptance criteria in paragraph 11 of Annex I of Bulletin.150. Replace all sprinklers in Sections which failed Are there any sections where 2 or more of the additional sprinklers tested failed? Where Extended testing of the Automatic Sprinkler System is necessary, any sections which have been subject to and passed to the additional testing referred to in Paragraph 11 of the Bulletin do not require to be subject to Extended testing and will be monitored at the next Annual Survey. further action required, situation will be monitored at next Annual Survey. Page 12 of 13 Annex II

Extended testing te: 1) Water quality is to be assessed in accordance with the requirements of Annex I of Bulletin.150 2) Where the testing results require sprinkler replacement the recommendations on replacement of sprinklers in Annex I of Bulletin.150 should be followed. Obtain the Failure rate, R FB, from Basic testing 10% <R FB 20%? R FB>20%? Extended testing Case i. 2 sprinklers to be tested per sprinkler section selected as follows: - If number of sections <20, test all sections; - If number of sections is between 20 and 40, test 20 sections; - If number of sections >40, test 50% of the sections. Where sprinklers fail to operate at pilot pressure, actual operating pressure is to be ascertained. In no circumstances should a sprinkler be operated to a pressure greater than maximum operating pressure of the system. Extended testing Case ii. 7 sprinklers from each sprinkler section. All sprinkler sections to be tested except for sections where the Company prefers to replace all sprinklers at this stage. Where sprinklers fail to operate at pilot pressure, actual operating pressure is to be ascertained. In no circumstances should a sprinkler be operated to a pressure greater than maximum operating pressure of the system. Assess test results against acceptance criteria for Extended testing Case i. Assess test results against acceptance criteria for Extended testing Case ii. Are there any sections where both sprinklers tested failed? Are there any sections with a failure rate >15%? For the sections where both sprinklers tested failed undertake additional testing of a further 10 sprinklers per section. Assess test results against acceptance criteria in paragraph 19 of Annex I of Bulletin.150. Did 10% of all sprinklers tested fail to operate at the pilot pressure? If the number of sprinklers tested in any particular section represents less than 10% of all sprinklers installed in this section the owners may choose to conduct further testing limited to 30% of the total number of sprinklers in that section and the results can be reassessed with all sprinklers tested in that section being considered. The acceptance criterion still remains a failure rate 15%. Are there any sections where 2 or more of the additional sprinklers tested failed? After further testing are there any sections with a failure rate >15%? Replace all Sprinklers in Sections which failed further action required, situation will be monitored at next Annual Survey. Replace all sprinklers in sections which have failed Extended testing Case ii. Remaining sections will be monitored at next Annual Survey Page 13 of 13 Annex II