Architectural Standards

Similar documents
Policies and Code Intent Sections Related to Town Center

Architectural Review Board Report

Site Planning. 1.0 Site Context. 2.0 Pedestrian Circulation Systems. Pag e 2-23

4.9 Mendocino Avenue Corridor Plan Design Guidelines

Walnut Creek Transit Village Design Guidelines. Part Three III - 25

appendix and street interface guidelines

VILLAGE OF SKOKIE Design Guidelines for Mixed-Use Districts NX Neighborhood Mixed-Use TX Transit Mixed-Use CX Core Mixed-Use

Incentives Bonus Height RequirementsProgram:: Proposed Mandatory and Elective Building Components

4.0 Design Guidelines For The Village Centre. South fields Community Architectural Design Guidelines Town of Caledon

PROPOSED WATERFRONT DISTRICT DESIGN STANDARDS

FRUITVALE TRANSIT VILLAGE (Phase 2) Residential Project

EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

The Village. Chapter 3. Mixed Use Development Plan SPECIFIC PLAN

Buildings may be set back to create small plazas provided that these setbacks do not substantially disrupt the street wall s continuity.

Town Center Design Guidelines

WATERFRONT DISTRICT DESIGN STANDARDS

WINDSOR GLEN DESIGN GUIDELINES

CITY OF MERCER ISLAND DESIGN COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

PLANNING AND DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR BLOCK C OF THE MT. DIABLO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA Adopted by Design Review Commission February 4, 2004

Community Design Plan

Cha p t e r 2: Ge n e r a l De s i g n Gu i d e l i n e s

ELK GROVE TOWN CENTER DESIGN GUIDELINES

SITE PLANNING. USC Village will be a mixeduse urban environment. creating a common ground with the surrounding community. Our planning goals include:

DRAFT Northeast Quadrant of Kipling Avenue and Highway 7 DRAFT AUGUST 29, Goals Land Use. The goals of this Plan are to:

Othello Neighborhood Design Guidelines

EXISTING TOWNHOUSE. What s working & What s not?

Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 4360, 2004, Amendment Bylaw No. 4897, 2016 (Sewell s Landing)

DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES

Design Guidelines Strategy

Community Mixed Use Zone Districts (CMU)

FREEWAY/TOURIST DISTRICT

B L A C K D I A M O N D D E S I G N G U I D E L I N E S for Multi-family Development

TOWN CENTER DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN STANDARDS

Town Center (part of the Comprehensive Plan)

Conceptual Design. Main Street Enhancement and Extension Project. Bothell, Washington. June 11, 2009

13. New Construction. Context & Character

Allen Street Civic District Redevelopment Area Plan Redevelopment Plan & Proposal State College Planning Commission State College Redevelopment

Revitalization Guidelines for Corridors, Villages and Town Centres

Chapter 4: Jordan Road Character District

Table of Contents. Elm Avenue Improvement Plan City of Waco, Texas. Introduction 1. Existing Context 1 Figure 1 2.

CITY OF SANTA MONICA DESIGN GUIDELINES DRAFT

Complete Neighbourhood Guidelines Review Tool

Appendix A COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

INSTITUTIONAL USE DESIGN COMPATIBILITY TECHNIQUES

City of Redlands Architectural Guidelines for Non-Residential Development

MILL CREEK TOWN CENTER DESIGN GUIDELINES APRIL 12, 2005

Draft for Public Review. The Market and Octavia Neighborhood Plan

GUIDELINES REPLACEMENT HOUSING GUIDELINES LOCATION INTRODUCTION URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

Concrete Flat Tile Roofs Large Exposed Overhangs Oversized Bracing Predominately Gable Roofs With Non-Plaster Gable End Treatments.

City of Farmington. Downtown Plan. Amendment to the 1998 Master Plan Adopted October 11, 2004

7-PARKS, OPEN SPACE & PUBLIC ART

Division VI Community Mixed Use (CMU) Architectural Guidelines and Standards

lot flankage Y street 16m 6m landscape strip for large site 3m landscape strip for small medium site

DRAFT DESIGN GUIDELINES

The broad range of permitted and special uses allowed in the district remain, but some descriptions have been clarified.

Lehigh Acres Land Development Regulations Community Planning Project

ZONING. 300 Attachment 1. City of Oneonta. Design Guidelines ( )

DEVELOPMENT CONTROLS MEDICAL DISTRICT

SECTION TWO: Overall Design Guidelines

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM

Highland Village Green Design Guidelines

I. Introduction. Prior Approvals

Temple Terrace Downtown Overlay District. Division 5

DESIGN COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING AGENDA

Design Guidelines. Roosevelt. Mike Podowski DPD Design Guidelines Ordinance ATT 13 August 13, 2012 Version #1

Public Frontage Regulations Map

Chapter 11. Industrial Design Guidelines 11.1 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE 11.3 SITE PLANNING GUIDELINES 11.2 GENERAL DESIGN OBJECTIVES

3.4 Business & Light Industrial Parks and Buildings

TEAM INPUT SUMMARY. Postcard Image?

Golden Gate Downtown Center Commercial Overlay District (GGDCCO).

MIXED-USE ZONING DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES

III. Additional Design Guidelines for Development Types

CHAPTER 20 THE RAILROAD CHARACTER AREA. The Railroad Character Area contains the railroad tracks and those lands flanking them.

5.1 Site Plan Guidelines

Planning Board Hearing October 20th, 2016

COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION

(Am. by ORD , ; ORD , )

R STREET CORRIDOR NEIGHBORHOOD Site Plan and Design Review Supplemental Guidelines Checklist

VICTORIA DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLANNING

1. Avoid extensive blank walls that would detract from the experience and appearance of an active streetscape.

B. Blocks, Buildings and Street Networks

Town of Essex Urban Design Guidelines for Downtown Harrow and Essex Centre May 2014

Residential Design Guidelines

TOWN CENTER DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE CITY OF. August, MOUNTLAKE TERRACE TOWN CENTER DESIGN STANDARDS August,

180 ZONING 180. ARTICLE XLII STREETSCAPE ENHANCEMENT OVERLAY ( SEO ) DISTRICT [Added Ord. No. 1086]

Transit Station Area Development Guidelines

Urban Design Brief Milton Thompson Developments Limited

This chapter contains the design standards and guidelines for development and improvement of office and industrial buildings and

DESIGN GUIDELINES. Planning Commission Re-Submittal. December 23, 2014 Revised to include Mixed-Use Design District Guidelines

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF URBAN DESIGN BRIEF 721 FRANKLIN BLVD, CAMBRIDGE August 2018

PUBLIC FRONTAGE REGULATIONS MAP

CITY OF MERCER ISLAND ORDINANCE NO. 16C-06

3.0 URBAN DESIGN. December 6, OVERVIEW

4. INDUSTRIAL 53 CASTLE ROCK DESIGN

Request Change in Nonconformity. Staff Recommendation Approval. Staff Planner Jonathan Sanders

RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES

Design Guidelines and Development Standards for Southwood Ranch. Prepared February, 2016 by

Resolution : Exhibit A. Downtown District Design Guidelines March 2003

DESIGN PROFESSIONALS DEEP DIVE THURSDAY, MAY 25, 2017

Design Guidelines Checklist

Transcription:

Architectural Standards A collection of provisions working in concert to meet the community design objectives for downtown 1. Average Daylight Plane Concept. Provisions ensures that facades along streets will be broken up with stepbacks & occasional courtyards. (see Average Daylight Plane poster for details) 4. Façade Details. Provision requires the integration of human-scaled design details into all building façades to add visual interest and enhance the character of new buildigns. Provision includes a list of options and allows applicant to pick at least 3 detail elements to integrate into the facade. 2. Major Façade Modulation. Provision requires a major façade modulation feature at intervals no more than 120 to break up the massing of large buildings along the street. Provision allows many design solutions to meet the standard. < 120 wide < 120 wide > 120 wide but with courtyard Courtyard breaks up block frontage massing 0 2 <1 0 0 2 >1 2 <1 Meets standard < Does not meet standard 0 12 Meets standard 3. Façade Articulation. Provision requires the integration of façade articulation features at intervals no more than 30 to add visual interest to the façade and break it up into a series of smaller articulated components. Provision includes a list of options and allows applicant to pick at least 3 treatments to meet the standard. Example details suggestions from another community 5. Building Materials. Provision elements: Promote high quality durable materials Require consistency on all sides of buildings Require architectural treatment of concrete walls Include special limitations on the use of concrete block and EIFS Prohibit metal beveled siding, mirrored glass and vinyl siding s t n e em l e n o i t a l u c Arti Island square is a good example of using quality durable materials and architectural treatment of concrete Uses changes in window pattern, awnings, roofline, and material/color at <30 intervals Uses window pattern, balconies, material changes, roofline, and façade modulation to articulate facade V I S I O N I N G & D E V E L O P M E N T Example use of EIFS that wouldn t be allowed in the Town Center 6. Building Color. Muted and dark saturated colors should be utilized for the background of buildings. Bright building colors should be limited to trim and accents. C O D E U P D A T E

Average Daylight Plane Concept Concept calls for building façades along all streets to meet the Average Daylight Plane (ADP) concept illustrated below. By employing an average, it promotes greater diversity in the building frontages by allowing architects to mix and match massing elements to meet the standard. It also provides much greater flexibility in creating workable building floorplans than a consistent daylight plane (if applied to the entire façade). ne la tp h g i Conceptual Block Layout Example The block massing concept below illustrates an example of how the Average Daylight Plane provision would work in promoting a variety of façade stepbacks and breaks and courtyards fronting on the street. Extra through-block connection (30 wide) used to help meet ADP along this frontage Calculations use the first 30 of property adjacent to streets to measure conformance. l ay D ge ra e Av 30 To meet the average Average Daylight Plane standard a block frontage could combine the following: Debit area Cropped corner plaza 10 stepbacks above 4th floor Segment with 10 + widened sidewalk Through-block connection Upper level residential courtyard facing street Examples that would and wouldn t meet ADP concept Segment with small stepback above 4th floor Variety of setbacks Courtyard Courtyard Space Credit area Island Square s 78th Aves E frontage illustrates an example of how a development could meet the ADP. Segment with courtyard adjacent to sidewalk V I S I O N I N G & D E V E L O P M E N T C O D E This development in Bellevue with its relatively flat facade on all block fonrtages and internalized courtyard would not U P D A T E

Bonus Height Provisions Illustrating what buildings & developments look like with and without the bonus height provisions. No Bonus Scenario Only 2-stories are allowed under the no bonus scenario. The US Bank site/building illustrates a typical 2-story building which are nearly always served by surface parking lots. While new construction would be required to integrate retail storefronts along 77th and 78th Avenue, rental or lease revenue by existing single story retailers would make it highly Bonus Scenario Five-story buildings could be built where complying with open space and affordable housing bonus requirements, plus other proposed standards (see Average Daylight Plane & Architectural Standards posters). Of all the 5-story buildings built in Town Center, Island Square most closely matches the proposed design standards. unlikely that such properties would be redeveloped with only two-story buildings. VISIONING & DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE

Frontages Proposed standards promote small scale retail frontages along key Town Illustrating the Frontage Standards Center Streets. The map below identifies proposed Primary, Secondary, and Limited retail block frontages. Hotel/motel, personal service, public facility, and/or office 40% max block frontage Primary Frontage Small Scale Small Restaurant 48 max 16 min depth Larger Scale er 60 max 60% max block frontage Secondary Frontage Frontage Standards Examples for Perspective NOTE: in the chart refers to retail, restaurants, and personal service uses. Primary Frontage Secondary Frontage Min % ground Floor Max Continuous linear frontage occupied by street frontage per use retail use 60% 48 40% 60 Min. space depth/ frontage width Min. 16' depth; Min. 30 width Limited No min. limited to 40% of frontage for multi-unit residential buildings. (up N/A Noah s (Now Einstein s) occupies close to 60 of block frontage; The Trader Joes example on the right occupies more than 100 of block frontage and wouldn t be allowed on designated Primary or Secondary Frontage to 80% for live/work unit frontages, unless it featured smaller retail liner storefronts to enable frontages) conformance with the maximum 48 or 60 continuous frontage standard. VISIONING & DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE

Through-Block Connections Examples Proposed standards include strategic through block connection requirements mapped below to improve pedestrian circulation, provide for public gathering spaces, and enhance the character and identity of the Town Center Average daylight plane provisions require breaks in block frontages that encourage additional through-block connections. Example of required connection V I S I O N I N G & D E V E L O P M E N T C O D E U P D A T E

Landscaping Elements Possible standards place a high priority in integrating landscaping elements into the design of sites and buildings. X% of the site shall include landscaped surfaces integrating a variety of landscaped types as shown below. Decorative planters along sidewalks and internal walkways (left). Green roofs particularly those visible from nearby buildings and hillsides (right). Decorative green walls. The example on the left with a mixture of plant materials and integrated design pattern would qualify for extra credit. Vine trellises can also be used to help meet the standard. Landscaping elements integrated into the design of buildings as in this example. Terraced planters along the sidewalk or an internal walkway are also encouraged. Integration of colorful low impact design planters along streets and internal walkways that double as stormwater management features (left). Landscaping as decorative focal point (right).