Introduction to the Shoreline Master Program (SMP) Update. City of Bellingham Planning Department 2005

Similar documents
Shoreline Master Program Town of La Conner, Washington

Public Visioning City of Kelso Planning Commission

FAQ S about Restoration Planning FROM THE Department of Ecology WEBSITE:

Staff will be providing an overview of the project need, purpose and intent for consideration as part of the Amendment cycle.

Stevens County Partnership Shoreline Master Program Update

Chapter 6. Overall Vision RECOMMENDATIONS. More Trail and Trail. Connections. Equal Access to Park. Facilities and Programs. Water Access.

Chapter 14. Shorelines

City Center Neighborhood Plan

Existing Facilities. Chapter 3:

E X I S T I N G F A C I L I T I E S

City of Richland Comprehensive Plan: Integrated Non-project Final Environmental Impact Statement

Clallam County Shoreline Master Program Update. Salt Creek and Tongue Point, 2006

Chapter 5: Natural Resources and Environment

City of Tacoma Shoreline Master Program Update Stakeholder Advisory Committee Meeting September 10, 2009

Working Group Meeting

SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM

Irongate Neighborhood Plan

Advice from Department of Ecology

Joe Pool Lake Lake Master Plan Public Information Meeting Presentation of Final Draft Revision July 31, 2018

EXHIBIT A CITY OF FORT WALTON BEACH, FLORIDA COASTAL MANAGEMENT & CONSERVATION

When planning stormwater management facilities, the following principles shall be applied where possible.

Introduction. Chapter 2 Land Use

St. Croix County Shoreland Overlay Zoning Districts. Public Hearing Community Development Committee December 19, 2013

CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION

Memorandum Planning. Thursday, January 8, 2015

Chapter WAC SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM GUIDELINES. Table of Contents WAC AUTHORITY, PURPOSE AND EFFECTS OF GUIDELINES.

Washington State Growth Management Act: The Basics. Kitsap County Department of Community Development

7.0 SOCIAL, ECONOMIC, AND ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES

RECREATION, OPEN SPACE AND GREENWAYS ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

2011 ASLA Design Awards. Westside Creeks Restoration Plan Merit Award AECOM, Fort Collins. Planning & Urban Design

Stormwater Regulations & Considerations Morse Study Area. Pam Fortun, P.E. CFM Senior Stormwater Treatment Engineer Engineering Services Division

Exhibit A Comprehensive Plan Amendments

RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

CITY OF BELLINGHAM PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT

Draft Rhode Island Stormwater Design and Installation Standards Manual

Ridgefield and the Growth Management Act

Level 1 Downstream Analysis

SAN RAFAEL GENERAL PLAN 2040 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW

Cornwall Park Neighborhood Plan

This page intentionally blank.

DISCUSSION TOPIC: ST JOHNS RIVER & ITS TRIBUTARIES (BPII) 2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICES AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK

TO: Port of Orcas FROM: Tina Whitman, Science Director SUBJECT: Master Plan Update DATE: September 7, 2018

Zoning Ordinance Chapter 10

Planning for Staten. Habitat Restoration and Green Infrastructure. Island s North Shore

Mendota Heights 2040 Comprehensive Plan Draft Vers

MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE Fisheries Division nd Avenue SE. Auburn, Washington

City of Tacoma Planning and Development Services

Draft Stillwater 2030 Comprehensive Plan- Goals and Policies

INTRODUCTION PLANNING HISTORY

Riparian Buffer on the Bushkill Creek. Policies

Existing Conditions and Environmental Consequences Floodplains

The City shall enhance and improve the accessibility of parks and recreational facilities while protecting their quality. by:

Pinellas County Greenways

City of Lafayette Study Session Staff Report Design Review Commission

Watershed Planning Workshop

Waterfront Redevelopment. City Council Briefing May 15, 2006

Planning Commission Retreat March 23 rd Comprehensive Plan Update Discussion

Chapter 10 IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATIONS

Urban Fringe Subarea Plan

17.18 SENSITIVE AREAS

TERRESTRIAL NATURAL HERITAGE SYSTEM STRATEGY APPENDIX F: MODEL POLICIES FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE TARGET TERRESTRIAL NATURAL HERITAGE SYSTEM

WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON

The following principles guide the development of goals and strategies to protect and promote these amenities:

HAZARD MITIGATION GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

A larger version of this map is located on the last page of this PDF.

Parks, Trails, and Open space Element

PUBLIC MEETING SEPTEMBER 19, 2012

Woodland Conservation and the Master Plan

ST. MARY S SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICT (SMSCD) AND DPW&T CONCEPT EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES AND CHECKLIST

Auke Bay Area Plan. Complete List of Goals and Policies for the Auke Bay Area Plan

Parks, Trails, and Open Space Element

Rule D Wetland and Creek Buffers

6Natural. Environment Development Permit Guidelines

Key Elements of Successful Conservation Planning. John Paskus October 17, 2013 Pierce Cedar Creek Institute Michigan Natural Features Inventory

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA CHECKLIST OPEN SPACE CLASSIFICATION

APPENDIX C. Architectural and Environmental Design Standards. Environmentally sensitive areas should be protected.

Manchester. Vision for Manchester

DRAFT MAP AMENDMENT FLU 04-4

3. VISION AND GOALS. Vision Statement. Goals, Objectives and Policies

Community LID Workgroup Issue Paper #6

Options for addressing City of Edmonds Alternatives to Ecology s Required Changes addressing Edmonds Marsh Buffers and Setbacks.

Dwelling Units Max 12 dwelling units per acre/min 8 dwelling units per acre. Development Mix 80% non residential/20% residential

LAND USE ELEMENT. Purpose. General Goals & Policies

Welcome. Tannery and Waterworks Parks Shoreline Improvements Environmental Assessment. Public Information Centre #1 November 27, pm to 8 pm

NJ Department of Environmental Protection

CONSERVATION ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

Rural Land Use Designations Kittitas County December 6, 2007 Draft

SENSITIVE LANDS OVERLAY

I. STAFF POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS. The following RMP policy strategies are proposed by staff in support of a Scenic Resource Protection Program:

4.1 LAND USE AND HOUSING

City of Surrey Ecosystem Management Study. Integration of ecological processes with land use

CONSERVATION ELEMENT:

Richton Park Western Development Corridor Green Infrastructure Development Plan August 18, 2017

Minnesota Department of Natural Resource - Natural Resource Guidance Checklist Conserving Natural Resources through Density Bonuses

Section 3 Non-Structural BMPs

1. Parks & Recreation Neighborhood Parks Community Parks Special Use Sites 2. Open Space 3. Trails

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 1472

Florida Forever Conservation Needs Assessment Overview Maps

APPENDIX I Presentations

Nick Sigmund, Sr. Zoning Officer

Transcription:

Introduction to the Shoreline Master Program (SMP) Update City of Bellingham Planning Department 2005

Purpose of tonight s meeting: Specify which water-bodies are subject to the SMP. Identify the State s requirements for SMP s and how other local planning efforts might be integrated. Tools necessary to achieve No Net Loss of ecological function. Coordination with other agencies & groups. Public process and next steps.

What areas are subject to the SMP? SHORELINES OF THE STATE which are: All areas waterward of the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) and, All uplands within 200 feet of the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) or the elevation of the Mean Higher High Tide (MHHT) and, up to the edge of 100-year floodplains and contiguous wetlands and, critical areas that are within or partly within these areas. Page 3 (A) and Page 77, section.180

Bellingham s Shorelines of the State: Bellingham Bay including Chuckanut Bay, Padden Lagoon and Padden Creek upstream to McKenzie Avenue. Whatcom, Squalicum and Chuckanut Creeks. Lakes Whatcom and Padden.

What is the SMP exactly? Local version of the SMA: (RCW 90.58) which requires local governments to: Page 6 (D)

Require water-dependent, water-related and waterenjoyment uses (a.k.a. water-oriented uses)

Protect shoreline natural resources

Promote public access

Manage Shorelines of Statewide Significance for the long-term benefit of all citizens of the State

SMP Guidelines Handbook for local governments intending to update their SMP s. State legislature directed DOE to update the 1972 version in 1995. Several iterations later the final SMP Guidelines were adopted in 2003. Guidelines translate SMA policies into standards for regulating uses on shorelines that result in a NO NET LOSS of ecological function.

The GMA requires the SMP to be consistent with and implement goals and policies in Bellingham s Comprehensive Plan (1995 and 2005) AND Provide a level of protection that is equal to or greater than level of protection of critical areas within shorelines. RCW 36.70A

What parts of the City of Bellingham Comprehensive Plan might interface with the SMP? The 1995 version and 2005 update include the following shoreline related sub-elements :

Neighborhood Plans Please See Appendix #3

Parks Open Space Plan

WFG Guiding Principles

.as well as Goals and Policies within the Framework, Land Use, Transportation, and Capital Facilities chapters...

...For example: LUG-3 Bellingham continues to retain its natural, green setting by protecting unique natural features and public open spaces, creating greenbelts and preserving wooded hillsides in and around the city. New development is encouraged to incorporate existing mature vegetation and additional trees and native vegetation. Open space corridors along creeks include connections from the Bay to Whatcom and Padden lakes as well as along the Squalicum and Chuckanut Creek corridors heading to the mountains. In order to preserve or create these green corridors and open spaces, the community employs a variety of techniques, including incentives and regulations for the design and siting of new development, as well as public acquisition.

Bay City Supply

Another example: LUG-37 Land uses that promote and allow public access to the waterfront should be encouraged.

Other plans that will serve as a basis for identification of restoration planning and public access opportunities: (not an exhaustive list) Bellingham Bay Demonstration Pilot Project (BBPP) EIS and Comprehensive Strategy. BBPP Land Use and Habitat Documentation Reports. Bellingham Wildlife Habitat Assessment. Restoration Plan and Environment Assessment for Whatcom Creek (result of pipeline event).

How do the CAO and SMP relate to one another? The SMP must reference critical areas as specified in the CAO that are within jurisdiction of Shorelines of the State AND identify critical areas within MARINE shorelines. Please see page 77, Section.180) The SMP must provide an equal to or greater level of protection of critical areas specified within the CAO and for critical areas within MARINE shorelines. Please see page 9, L.

: ; : : NG CRA SS /..

Our task: Integrate all these elements and develop an SMP that achieves the following objectives:

Protection of ecological function

Requirements for public access

Designate preferred uses such as: WATER-DEPENDENT USES Please see section.150 - Shoreline Designations - D. High Intensity

WATER-RELATED USES Please see section.150 - Shoreline Designations - D. High Intensity

WATER-ENJOYMENT USES Please see section.150 - Shoreline Designations

AKA: WATER-ORIENTED USES

Shorelines for NON-WATER ORIENTED USES

AND... Identify restoration opportunities Please see APPENDIX #2

How do we get there?

Characterize shoreline resources Please see Shoreline Inventory - final report on web-page and page 23. Whatcom Creek Drainage Analysis Landscape Setting Land Use Landscape Setting Whatcom Creek is the only natural surface water outlet of Lake Whatcom. Whatcom Creek is 4.3 miles long with a drainage basin of approximately 5,790 acres. A control dam is located at the upper extent of Whatcom Creek, which is used for down-stream flood control, utility storage for water quantity and water quality considerations in the lake, and to maintain lake levels. The hydroperiod of Lake Whatcom is controlled for recreation and erosion control purposes. Lake levels are maintained at higher levels during the summer and lowered during the winter. This manipulation of water level and discharge affects the hydroperiod of Whatcom Creek. (Ref# 8,13,37,47,71 for above) Geology Upper reaches: Continental sedimentary rock, resulting in a narrow incised channel with steep slopes and bedrock substrate and outcrops. Lower reaches: Glaciomarine drift in narrow, incised channels that are surrounded by relatively flat terrain. (Ref# 21,103 for above) Soils Upper reaches: Moderate infiltration rates with moderate runoff potential. Lower reaches: Very slow infiltration, with high runoff potential. The mouth of Whatcom Creek is dominated by artificial fill. (Ref# 47,51,63 for above) Current Conditions Whatcom Creek flows through the heart of the City of Bellingham, and into Bellingham Bay in the middle of dense industrial development. Commercial, industrial, and residential uses dominate the land use in close proximity of the creek in the lower portion of Whatcom Creek. The Iowa Street corridor between Interstate-5 and Whatcom Falls Park is the only remaining length of the creek where there is development potential. Whatcom Falls Park located in the upper reaches of the SMA. (Ref# 8,16,33,34,71 for above)

Develop Shoreline Goals that address the following: Please see page 25, section.140, Shoreline Goals Shorelines uses Circulation Recreation Public Access Conservation Water Quality Historical, Cultural, educational, scientific Flood damage minimization Economic Development

Assign shoreline designations - for example: Please see page 33, section.150, Shoreline Designations

Develop general regulations For example: Development within shorelines designated NATURAL shall not be allowed within 200 of the OHWM.

And use specific regulations For Example: Docks, piers, floats and pilings within Lake Whatcom shall not be constructed with chemically treated wood. Please see page 68, section.170, Use Regulations, J.

Implement mitigation sequencing Avoid the impact Minimize the impact Rectify the impact by restoration Reduce the impact by preservation Compensate by replacing or enhancing Monitor impacts and make corrections Please see page 115, section.205, Mitigation Sequencing

Implement Restoration Planning Please see APPENDIX #2

Coordinate with other agencies including but not limited to:

These folks comprise our Technical Advisory Committee

This group s task is to: Review our shoreline inventory and ID data gaps. Provide assistance on determining jurisdiction and assigning designations. Review our goals and policies. Review our regulations to assure that they achieve a no net loss of ecological function. Assist in creating a framework for restoration planning.

Involve the general public Multiple public hearings and website info Review and comment on Shoreline Goals Review and comment on Shoreline Designations - uses Review and comment on Use Policies Identify restoration opportunities

NEXT STEPS: Planning Commission Public Hearing scheduled for December 15, 2005, 7 PM City Council Chambers Gather all comments and arrange by topic, present to Planning Commission, allow for further direction, recommendations.