Engineering with Passion The 2nd Australia-Japan Symposium on Carbon Resource Utilisation Development of Australian Brown Coal Reforming Technology for Power Generation 16 th, April., 2018, Brisbane NIPPON STEEL & SUMIKIN ENGINEERING CO., LTD. K. SEKIMOTO S. TAKEDA K. KATO
Contents
<Status of low rank coal usage> Amount of low rank coal accounts for more than half of recoverable coal resources. low rank coal Brown coal (201 billion tons) Sub-bituminous coal (287 billion tons) Bituminous coal& anthracite (403 billion tons) <Disadvantages of Brown coal> High moisture content Low calorific value Strong spontaneous heating (Total:892 billion tons ) Fig.1 Survey of coal resources (ref.) WEC, 2013
Contents
<Reforming process flow > Heat Recovery Implementation in Victoria Japanese power generators Raw Coal Dried Coal Reformed Coal Product Brown Coal Dryer Primary Drier + Secondary Drier Pyrolyzer Stabilizer Alternative to Steam Coal Powder coal Briquetting Powder coal Briquetting Marine transport 10 Mil ton/y Fig 2 Reforming process flow <Key technologies of the reforming process> Drying : To reduce moisture content. Carbonization : To increase calorific value.
Calorific value [kj/kg] <Aim of reforming > To convert Brown coal into an alternative power generation coal by increasing it s calorific value. Raw Coal Brown Coal 30000 25000 Dryer Primary Drier + Secondary Drier Heat Recovery Dried Coal 24,450 Implementation in Victoria Pyrolyzer 27,000 Reformed Coal Marine transport Japanese power generators Product Alternative to Bituminous Coal Fig 2 Reforming Process flow 20000 15000 10000 5000 0 12,250 Raw coal Dried coal Reformed coal Fig.3 Change of Brown coal calorific value Calorific target value is more than 27,000 kj/kg!
Contents
<New development> 1. Improvement of total reforming energy efficiency. Reusing waste steam from pyrolyzer. Reusing waste steam from secondary drier by cascade use. 2. Safe temperature range for coal drying to prevent spontaneous heating. 3. The Primary Dryer with built-in indirect heating system to downsizing. Cascade use Waste steam BFW Moisture 60% Moisture 60% 30% Waste steam 100 Moisture 30 15% Raw coal Primary dryer (Under development) Secondary drier (Conventional technology) Pyrolyzer (Carbonization) Reformed coal Air fluidized-bed Steam moving-bed Fig.4 Reforming process flow
<Experimental point> Condition of fluidization Drying characteristics : - Relationship between moisture content and coal temperature. 6kg/batch scale Bug Air temperature :80 Raw coal Fluidized-bed Indirect heating tubes Oil tank Oil pump Air Blower Air heater Fig.5 Laboratory equipment Fig.6 Appearance
Ratio (%) <Coal sample :Loy Yang coal> Raw coal Crusher Suitable particle size for fluidization Table.1 Proximate analysis (%,dry) TM(%) VM FC Ash 57.1 50.3 46.4 3.3 Ave. d 50 : 2.1 mm Particle size (mm) Fig.7 Particle size distribution
ΔP [KPa] 1~4 ソ ーン圧力損失 [kpa] 1~4 ソ ーン圧力損失 [kpa] ΔP [KPa] <Experimental result> Hot air velocity (U: measured) > Fluidization velocity (Umf : calculated ) Stable fluidization Freeboard U < Umf Instability fluidization U > Umf Stable fluidization Fluidized-bed 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1ソ ーン _ 差圧 2ソ ーン _ 差圧 3ソ ーン _ 差圧 4ソ ーン _ 差圧 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1ソ ーン _ 差圧 2ソ ーン _ 差圧 3ソ ーン _ 差圧 4ソ ーン _ 差圧 Heating tubes Distributor U ΔP Hot air Fig.8 Section of fluidized-bed 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 11:00 11:30 12:00 12:30 時刻 Time [h:m] 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 12:45 13:15 13:45 14:15 14:45 時刻 Time [h:m] Fig.9 Trend of ΔP in fluidized-bed
Moisture[%], Temperature [ ] <Result> When coal temperature is constant. Moisture content range:60%~25% When coal temperature increase. Moisture content :under 25% 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Constant-rate drying (Moisture 60~25%) Moisture Coal temperature Decreasing-rate drying (Moisture 25%~) Temperature increase 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Drying time [min] Fig.10 Drying characteristics of Loy Yang coal
Improvement of total drying energy efficiency by using waste steam from the Secondary Dryer. Drying temperature < 60 to avoid spontaneous heating. Primary Dryer has two heat sources; 1) Direct heating system with hot air. 2) Indirect heating system with steam tubes (built-in). Raw coal [Moisture 60%] Indirect heating System zone A zone B zone C zone D Bag For steam tubes Waste steam Secondary dryer Shell Steam Temperature <120 Fig.11 Process flow of primary dryer Dried coal [Moisture 30%] Dry air Target capacity has been achieved by the pilot test. (700kg/h)
<Experimental result> Coal temperature < 60 during constant-rate drying was achived. Safety coal temperature range(<60 ) with air drying was confirmed feasible. Moisture 60% 42% Fig.12 Trend of coal temperature
<Experimental result> 1) Heat exchange capacity of drying floor area was doubled by indirect heating steam tubes. 2) Evaporative water of drying floor area was doubled. drying capacity increased at same hot air Reduction of hot air Fig.13 Comparison of heat exchange capacity Fig.14 Comparison of evaporative water
<Coal drying technology> 1) Reforming energy efficiency increased by utilization of waste steam. 2) Safe coal temperature drying was achieved with air fluidized-bed. 3) Downsizing of equipment was achieved by built-in indirect heating steam tubes.
Contents
<Concept (1)> Using volatile matter(vm) gas as fuel from Pyrolyzer. Without fuel of outside to improve reforming energy efficiency. Raw Coal (VM50%) Reformed Coal (VM25%) VM 50% VM gas fired as fuel Pyrolyzer FC 50% VM 25% FC 75% Fig.15 VM of Reformed Coal Fig.16 Pyrolyzer of carbonization system
Calorific value [kj/kg] <Concept (2)> Increasing of calorific value of raw coal is equivalent to steam coal (more than 27,000 kj/kg ) by carbonization. 30000 24,450 27,000 Target value is more than 27,000 kj/kg! Steam coal 25000 20000 15000 10000 5000 0 12,250 Raw coal Dried coal Reformed coal Table.2 Analysis data Ultimate analysis [mass%, d.a.f.] C H N S O FC VM Raw Coal 67.0 4.6 0.7 0.2 24.5 45.6 51.2 Reformed Coal 79.5 3.5 0.9 0.2 15.9 70.3 25.7 C:Increase Proximate analysis [mass%-dry] O:Decrease Fig.17 Calorific value of Brown Coal
<Result> VM gas fired as fuel = Heat requirement of Dryer and Carbonization. Raw Coal (VM50%) VM 50% FC 50% Reformed Coal (VM25%) VM gas fired as fuel VM 25% FC 75% Drying Carbonization Fig.18 Heat requirement of drying and carbonization VM25% is the most suitable for reformed coal of our project.
<Result> 1) Strong correlation between carbonization temperature,vm and calorific value. 2) Calorific value of reformed coal(vm 25% )is equivalent to steam coal. Table.3 Analysis data Ultimate analysis [mass%, d.a.f.] Proximate analysis [mass%-dry] C H N S O FC VM Raw Coal 67.0 4.6 0.7 0.2 24.5 45.6 51.2 Reformed Coal 79.5 3.5 0.9 0.2 15.9 70.3 25.7 Coal A 71.6 5.1 1.1 0.2 22.0 49.9 46.0 Coal B 78.4 5.0 1.0 0.3 15.4 52.5 36.1 Coal C 81.3 5.0 2.1 0.6 10.9 53.4 33.0 Steam coal Fig.19 Relationship between VM and calorific value
<Carbonization technology> 1) Correlation between carbonization temperature, VM and calorific value has strong. 2) Calorific value of reformed coal is equivalent to steam coal calorific value. (more than 27,000 kj/kg)
Contents
<Coal drying technology> 1) Reforming energy efficiency was increased by utilization of waste steam. 2) Safety coal temperature drying was achieved with air fluidized-bed. 3) Downsizing was achieved by indirect heating steam tubes. <Carbonization technology> 1) Calorific value of reformed coal was increased by carbonization technology. (more than 27,000 kj/kg ) Suitable for power generation.
1) Preparation of demonstration project in Australia. - Validity in scale-up procedure - Effects of long term operation 2) Study on application of other raw coals.
This presentation is based on results obtained from a project commissioned by the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO).
We sincerely expect the Success of this Project by cooperation with both countries! Thank you for your kind attention!