TYPE 1 FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT REVIEW (NO DESTRUCTIVE AUDIT)

Similar documents
Fire Risk Assessment Report - Initial. 23 Newhaven Court, Nantwich, CW5 5GT

Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 Category of Premises against the FSO 2005: Sleeping Accommodation

Princess Court Cornbrook Park Road Old Trafford Manchester M15 4FE

Fire Risk Assessment. ABC Car Workshop. Prepared for. Redacted

FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT Retirement Housing (Independent Living) (v3.november 2016)

Byker Various post codes. Your Homes Newcastle Health and Safety (fire) Officer Date of Fire Risk Assessment 18 th February nd October 2014

Fire Risk Assessment

REGULATORY REFORM (FIRE SAFETY) ORDER 2005 PERIODIC REVIEW OF FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT

REGULATORY REFORM (FIRE SAFETY) ORDER 2005 FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT

FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT

Fire Risk Assessment Mechanics Institute Manchester Road Burnley BB11 1JA

Slight Harm Moderate Harm Extreme Harm Low Trivial Risk Tolerable Risk Moderate Risk Medium Tolerable Risk Moderate Risk Substantial Risk

S12 Fire Safety Risk Assessment H&SFS01-1 / 9

Fire Risk Assessment Keys Meadow Primary School

FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT. Hatton House. Page 1 of 21

REGULATORY REFORM (FIRE SAFETY) ORDER 2005 PERIODIC REVIEW OF FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT

Fire Risk Assessment Guide

Fire Risk Assessment Guide

REGULATORY REFORM (FIRE SAFETY) ORDER 2005 FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT

REGULATORY REFORM (FIRE SAFETY) ORDER 2005 FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT

Fire Risk Assessment

AFEC FIRE ENGINEERING TEMPLATE FOR CLIENTS INTERNALLY COMPLETED RISK ASSESMENT

Fire Risk Assessment Guide

Fire Risk Assessment

Fire Risk Assessment

Fire Risk Assessment

REGULATORY REFORM (FIRE SAFETY) ORDER 2005 PERIODIC REVIEW OF FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT

Fire Risk Assessment Report

Fire Risk Assessment 69-77A Black Lion Lane South Hammersmith, Ravenscourt Park W6 9BG 25/07/2017

REGULATORY REFORM (FIRE SAFETY) ORDER 2005 FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT

The Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order Fire Risk Assessment Report

NOTTINGHAM CITY HOMES

Fire Risk Assessment Report

REGULATORY REFORM (FIRE SAFETY) ORDER 2005 PERIODIC REVIEW OF FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT

Fire Risk Assessment. Guidance Notes. Location details. Risk Rating. Assessors. General notes

FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT REVIEW

FIRE SAFETY IN PURPOSE BUILT BLOCKS OF FLATS

FIRE SAFETY POLICY LEEDS METHODIST MISSION. Oxford Place Centre

fire risk assessment For use by landlords of small premises Premises Address

FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT Waterstones High Street, Solihull, West Midlands, B91 3SW.

LYHA Fire Safety Policy

Fire Risk Assessment. Index. Part 1 Introduction Part 2 The Fire Risk Assessment Part 3 The Management Action Plan

REGULATORY REFORM (FIRE SAFETY) ORDER 2005

Legal Requirements. There is no general legal requirement to install sprinklers. in places of work

University of Kent; Vice Chancellor; Director of Kent Hospitality

Fire Safety Policy 29/09/2017. Holme Grange School Whole School Policy Including EYFS. Fire Safety Policy

Fire Risk Assessment 2017

Charlotte Building, 17 Gresse Street, London W1T 1QL

FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT REVIEW

FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT NOT KNOWN 15/10/ SOMERTON COURT BROADMOSS DRIVE SIMON ROFFEY

FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT REVIEW

Kensington Aldridge Academy, London W10

HOMES FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT. Hatton House. Page 1 of 24

UCL PRINCIPAL CONTRACTOR SITE FIRE SAFETY RISK REVIEW & MITIGATION MEASURES

AMBASSADOR HOUSE. A guide on. Fire Safety in Purpose Built Blocks of Flats

THE REGULATORY REFORM (FIRE SAFETY) ORDER 2005 FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT SPORTS CENTRE

5 Key Stages to Risk Assessment

UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON REGULATORY REFORM (FIRE SAFETY) ORDER 2005

FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT review

Q) What should I do if the fire alarm sounds in the building? Q) What do I do if I discover a fire?

Fire Safety Protocol

Fire Risk Assessment Safety Checklist

THE REGULATORY REFORM (FIRE SAFETY) ORDER 2005 FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT NO 68 (ENGLISH AND PHILOSOPHY)

Fire precautions in dwellings

Fire Risk Assessment Guidance

Co-Director, Tizard Centre (P. McGill) in conjunction with Council & the Vice Chancellor

1970s building housing main school reception and support offices. Well managed buildings with no significant risk of a fire occurring.

Fire Risk Assessment Standish House Saint Peters Grove W6 9AY 22/06/17

Well managed building mean risk is normal. Fire action notices should be displayed by all alarm break glass call points.

Management Standard: Fire Safety

Fire Enforcement Report

FIRE SAFETY LOG BOOK

Fire Risk Assessment

Assessment of Fire Risk under the Requirements of the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005

FP-PGN-14 Part of NTW(O)41 Fire Policy

FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT Self Assessment

THE REGULATORY REFORM (FIRE SAFETY) ORDER 2005 FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT NEW BUILDINGS

THE REGULATORY REFORM (FIRE SAFETY) ORDER 2005 FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT HORSEFAIR HOUSE

Are you educated in safe emergency evacuation and fire safety risk assessments? Education: A Guide to Fire Safety

FIRE SAFETY LOG BOOK. (Record of Fire Safety Equipment Testing)

161 Rosebery Avenue, London, EC1 Fire Safety Management Plan & Evacuation Procedures

London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham

London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham

THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT GROUP GUIDE: FIRE SAFETY IN PURPOSE-BUILT BLOCKS OF FLATS

Loss Prevention Standards

A GUIDE TO THE REGULATORY REFORM ORDER (FIRE SAFETY) 2005 (RRO)

SOUTHERN HEALTH NHS FOUNDATION TRUST

Cladding Screening Test Result

Fire Risk Management Policy. UK September 2017

FIRE POLICY ST.GEORGES AND OUR LADY QUEEN OF PEACE PARISHES OF WORCESTER INTRODUCTION. Fire is one of the most common workplace hazards.

St Edward s Oxford FIRE SAFETY POLICY

Fire Risk Assessment. Do-it-Yourself ekit. Guidance Manual

Dan Gray, Property Director. Date: November 2017 Review Due Date: November 2020

Health and Safety Policy. Version Author Revisions Made Date 1 Colin Campbell First Draft March 2014

Fire Safety Management Plan. Qube 90, Whitfield Street, W1T 4EZ. Fire Safety Management Plan & Evacuation Procedures

Technical reference Reference & design

Waking Watch / Common Fire Alarm. Guidance to support a temporary simultaneous evacuation strategy in a purpose-built block of flats

ISLE OF WIGHT FIRE & RESCUE SERVICE

Fire risk management plan. MH/05/Revised/06/17

A basic guide to... Fire Safety for Scout Premises

Transcription:

TYPE 1 FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT REVIEW (NO DESTRUCTIVE AUDIT) BRECON TOWERS BLACKBERRY LANE STOCKPORT SK5 8JW Date of this risk assessment review: 4th July 2017 Date of last risk assessment review: 8th May 2013 Date of original fire risk assessment: 13th February 2006 Registered in England & Wales No. 4628546 "HELPING YOU WITH YOUR FIRE SAFETY LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES

SUMMARY REPORT Type 1 Fire risk assessment Common parts only (non-destructive) The inspection of the building is non-destructive. As well as considering the arrangements for means of escape, the fire risk assessment includes examination of at least a sample of flat entrance doors. It also considers, so far as reasonably practicable, the separating construction between the flats and the common parts without any opening up of construction. However, in this Type of fire risk assessment, entry to flats beyond the area of the flat entrance door is not involved. Where there are demountable false ceilings in the common parts, it may be appropriate to lift a sample of readily accessible false ceiling tiles. In addition, it will normally be appropriate to open a sample of service risers, provided access is practicable at the time of inspection. Unless there is reason to expect serious deficiencies in structural fire protection, such as inadequate compartmentation, or poor fire stopping a Type 1 inspection will normally be sufficient for most blocks of purpose-built flats. Where doubt exists in relation to these matters, the action plan of a Type 1 fire risk assessment may recommend that one of the other types of fire risk assessment be carried out or that further investigation be carried out by specialists. This report is a review of the original full fire risk assessment carried out in February 2006 and the last review in May 2013. As such this review report format does not include items of reference that are contained within the original full fire risk assessment report. The Action Plan within this review report only contains items of work and management actions required. Generic goodwill advice is included in the original full fire risk assessment report. The comments made in this report are made without prejudice to the requirements of any enforcing authority. The Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 replaced the Fire Precautions (Workplace) Regulations 1997 as amended and the Fire Precautions Act 1971 in October 2006. Similar to The Workplace Regulations, the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order requires the owner as a responsible person to prepare a written fire risk assessment relating only to the common areas and provisions within the complex. Stockport Homes has prepared a written fire risk assessment for the general fire precautions within this building. The general fire precautions include horizontal/vertical escape routes, fire alarm and detection systems, emergency lighting, fire fighting equipment and signage in escape routes.

General Fire Precautions as defined within the Order means: measures to reduce the risk of fire on the premises and the risk of the spread of fire on the premises; measures in relation to the means of escape from the premises; measures for securing that, at all material times, the means of escape can be safely and effectively used including any emergency lighting system; measures in relation to the means for fighting fires on the premises; measures in relation to the means for detecting fire on the premises and giving warning in case of fire on the premises; and measures in relation to the arrangements for action to be taken in the event of fire on the premises, including - (i) (ii) measures relating to the instruction and training of employees; and measures to mitigate the effects of the fire. In addition to the original fire risk assessment, Stockport Homes has elected to conduct reviews to ensure any changes to the building layout, occupiers or working practices have been correctly recorded, along with any additional actions required to ensure employees and others who may resort to the building, are adequately protected from the effects of a fire. This review is confined to the common areas and common fire safety provisions within the building, however if possible, comment upon the performance characteristics of access doors to individual dwellings and observations on the fire alarm system installed within individual flats are included where they form an integral part of the means of escape strategy for the building NB: All recommendations and observations made within this document are made without prejudice to any recommendations and findings which may have the effect of amending national fire safety standards and or Building Regulations following the fatal fires at Lakanal House, Camberwell on the 3 July 2009 and Grenfell Tower, on 14 June 2017. Property description and significant The building is a twelve storey block of flats (ground floor, and eleven upper floors with roof level plant room) of predominately concrete construction and concrete floors; the building has been clad externally since its erection, replacement upvc windows have also been installed throughout the block. Each of the upper floors contains 6 flats and has a single secured refuse chute issuing to the secured sprinkler protected refuse/bin room at ground level. The main entrance to the building is intercom and concierge controlled. The 24 hour concierge system is connected to the fire detection/sprinkler system fitted within the ground floor bin room and the fire detection fitted within the ground floor plant rooms and cage room.

The floors are reached by two lifts which serve alternate floors, i.e. odd floors or even floors. The means of escape from the upper floors is by means of two staircases, both with a final exit at ground floor level. The final exits are readily available without the use of a key and issues to a place of safety away from the building. Secured access is available to the roof top plant/lift motor room via a padlocked gated entrance at the eleventh floor level within a staircase enclosure. The plant room has four roof top vents within the plant room/lift motor room situated immediately above each of the four service risers. There are four concrete service risers running the full height of the building. The risers are accessed off the common corridors via fire rated steel access doors. The service risers have been subject to Type 4 destructive fire risk assessments. The findings of the Type 4 assessments are included in a separate report. Remedial works have been carried out in the risers since the last review to fire stop gaps around holes which prejudice the integrity of the risers. A Fire Box is provided in the entrance foyer. The access number for the box is passed to the fire service when they are mobilised to any incident. The box contains keys to gain access to all parts of the building, lift key, window lock keys for the ventilation windows on each landing level and plans of the building. The fire extinguishers have been tested this year. FIRE EVACUATION STRATEGY FOR THE BUILDING The block operates a Stay Put evacuation procedure whereby only the occupants of the flat of origin need evacuate on actuation of the fire alarm system within their flat. The communal areas should be a sterile area, which is kept free of any combustible items, therefore the chance of a fire occurring in these areas is minimal. Should a fire occur in another flat, it will normally be safe for you to stay in your own flat, unless you feel threatened by the fire or are directed to leave by the Fire Service. NOTES Sprinkler systems Sprinkler systems are currently normally provided in recently constructed buildings of higher than 30 metres. In blocks of flats they need only be installed in the dwellings and help to extinguish or limit the size of the fire in its early stages. Brecon Towers is not provided with sprinklers other than the water suppression system within the refuse/bin room.

Additional Relevant Building Fire Safety Features: An BS 5266 Part 1 type emergency lighting system is installed in all common parts. See comment re rooftop lighting. A single dry rising fire fighting mains is provided; this has been recently maintained and tested. Fire detection linked to the Concierge facility is provided in the ground floor cage room, plant rooms and refuse room. Each flat entrance lobby is fitted with one hard wired smoke alarm. Some of the flats are also fitted with a hard wired heat alarm within the kitchen. Type 4 destructive fire risk assessments have been carried out to this building. It is understood that samples of all materials used in the cladding system are being collected for independent testing. PROGRESS OF ORIGINAL RECOMMENDATIONS: In general the majority of items listed in the original Fire Risk Assessment have been addressed satisfactorily. CHANGES ADVERSLY AFFECTING THE SAFETY OF PERSONS: None ACTION PLAN PRIORITES Action Ref 1 - Means of Escape Action Ref 13 - Artificial and Emergency Lighting

FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT The following simple risk level estimator is based on a more general health and safety risk level estimator of the type contained in BS 8800: Potential consequences of fire Likelihood of fire Slight harm Moderate harm Extreme harm Low Trivial risk Tolerable risk Moderate risk Medium Tolerable risk Moderate risk Substantial risk High Moderate risk Substantial risk Intolerable risk Taking into account the fire prevention measures observed at the time of this risk assessment, it is considered that the hazard from fire (likelihood of fire) at these premises is: Low Medium High In this context, a definition of the above terms is as follows: Low: Unusually low likelihood of fire as a result of negligible potential sources of ignition. Medium: Normal fire hazards (e.g. potential ignition sources) for this type of occupancy, with fire hazards generally subject to appropriate controls (other than minor shortcomings). High: Lack of adequate controls applied to one or more significant fire hazards, such as to result in significant increase in likelihood of fire. Taking into account the nature of the building and the occupants, as well as the fire protection and procedural arrangements observed at the time of this fire risk assessment, it is considered that the consequences for life safety in the event of fire would be: Slight harm Moderate harm Extreme harm In this context, a definition of the above terms is as follows: Slight harm: Outbreak of fire unlikely to result in serious injury or death of any occupant (other than an occupant sleeping in a room in which a fire occurs). Moderate harm: Extreme harm: Outbreak of fire could foreseeably result in injury (including serious injury) of one or more occupants, but it is unlikely to involve multiple fatalities. Significant potential for serious injury or death of one or more occupants.

Accordingly, it is considered that the risk to life from fire at these premises is: Trivial Tolerable Moderate Substantial Intolerable A suitable risk-based control plan should involve effort and urgency that is proportional to risk. The following risk-based control plan is based on one advocated by BS 8800 for general health and safety risks: Risk level Trivial Tolerable Moderate Substantial Intolerable Action and timescale No action is required and no detailed records need be kept. No major additional controls required. However, there might be a need for improvements that involve minor or limited cost. It is essential that efforts are made to reduce the risk. Risk reduction measures should be implemented within a defined time period. Where moderate risk is associated with consequences that constitute extreme harm, further assessment might be required to establish more precisely the likelihood of harm as a basis for determining the priority for improved control measures. Considerable resources might have to be allocated to reduce the risk. If the building (or relevant area) is unoccupied, it should not be occupied until the risk has been reduced. If the building (or area) is occupied, urgent action should be taken. Building (or relevant area) should not be occupied until the risk is reduced. (Note that, although the purpose of this section is to place the fire risk in context, the above approach to fire risk assessment is subjective and for guidance only. All hazards and deficiencies identified in this report should be addressed by implementing all recommendations contained in the action plan. The fire risk assessment should be reviewed regularly.)