FINAL MITIGATION PLAN to address

Similar documents
7.0 SECTION 4(F) EVALUATION

APPENDIX D: Visual and Aesthetic Conditions for NCCU Station Refinement. Durham-Orange Light Rail Transit Project

7.0 DRAFT SECTION 4(f) EVALUATION

5.2 LAND USE AND ZONING

APPENDIX J SHPO COORDINATION

Transportation Committee

Corridor Management Committee. September 29, 2017

RZC Public View Corridors and Gateways

3.6 Visual Quality and Aesthetics

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Appendix E Section 4(f) Evaluation

Corridor Vision. 1Pursue Minnehaha-Hiawatha Community Works Project. Mission of Hennepin County Community Works Program

MINNESOTA ARCHITECTURE - HISTORY INVENTORY FORM

CITY OF MERCER ISLAND DESIGN COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

Mississippi Skyway Preliminary Engineering Report

Corridor Background. Defining the Corridor Study Area. Lake Street. 38th Street. 46th Street

Meeting Display Boards for Public Hearing on the Wilson Transfer Station Project held Tuesday, February 18, 2014.

A. INTRODUCTION B. PROJECT LOCATION

Central Corridor Light Rail Transit. Environmental Assessment Three Infill Stations. Western, Victoria, and Hamline

Northern Branch Corridor SDEIS March 2017

West Broadway Transit Study Initial Screening of Alternatives Memo

MINNESOTA ARCHITECTURE - HISTORY INVENTORY FORM

Request for Statement of Interest in Implementation of the Roosevelt Road Redevelopment Plan

Page. I. Introduction 1. II. Project Purpose and Need 2. IV. Description of Section 4(f) Property 2. V. Impacts to Section 4(f) property 3

2.7 ac park. TOTAL 5,403 DU 1,297,900 sf 1,105,450 sf 3.87 ac 5,563 DU 1,121,200 sf 1,105,450 sf 3.87 ac

3.5 VISUAL AND AESTHETIC QUALITIES

Issues Requiring Future Study

2. INTRODUCTION 2.1 AUTHORITY 2.2 PURPOSE AND INTENT 2.3 SITE LOCATION

Open Space and Recreational Resources

I Street, Sacramento, CA

ROAD CLOSURE AND LAND USE AMENDMENT SILVER SPRINGS (WARD 1) NORTHEAST OF NOSEHILL DRIVE NW AND SILVER SPRINGS ROAD NW BYLAWS 2C2018 AND 29D2018

SUBJECT: PREDEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW OF PROJECT LOCATED AT 2632 EAST WASHINGTON BOULEVARD ('ST. LUKE MEDICAL CENTER')

RESOLUTION NO. R Refining the route, profile and stations for the Downtown Redmond Link Extension

National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet

17.1 INTRODUCTION CONTEXT CONCLUSIONS

Subject: City of Richfield Cedar Avenue Corridor Plan Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Review File No

Mill Woods Town Centre Proposed Rezoning LDA

Bassett Creek Valley Working Group. October 4, 2017

Colerain Township report to. Hamilton County Regional Planning Commission. December 2, 2010, 1:00PM. t a f f r e p o r t

ALTERNATIVES. NCDOT made an early decision to first determine how to build the project (construction method) followed by what to build (alternatives).

Chapter 2, Section C: Urban Design and Visual Resources A. INTRODUCTION

B. PROPOSED REFINEMENTS POTENTIALLY AFFECTING URBAN DESIGN AND VISUAL RESOURCES

ELMVALE ACRES SHOPPING CENTRE MASTER PLAN

LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (LACMTA)

Knoxville Area Transit (KAT) Transit Development Plan Corridor Analysis

SECTION 4(f) DE MINIMIS DOCUMENTATION

TEMPLE MEDICAL & EDUCATION DISTRICT

THE NEIGHBORHOOD TODAY

SUBJECT: PREDEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW OF PROJECT LOCATED AT E. COLORADO BOULEVARD (PASEO COLORADO)

City of Toronto. Emery Village Transportation Master Plan

Northwest Rail Corridor and US 36 BRT Development Oriented Transit Analysis 4.4 STATION AREA FINDINGS

Appendix D Community Impact Assessment

5.4.6 Cumulative Operational Impacts

MEMORANDUM. DATE: March 15, Chairman and Members Community Redevelopment Agency. Leif J. Ahnell, C.P.A., C.G.F.O. Executive Director

Draft Evaluation of Alignment Alternatives Methodology and Results Report. 3 nd Draft. May 2011(rev June 17, 2011)

Analysis of Environs of 1000 New York Street, German Methodist Episcopal Church

ATTACHMENT A 09/12/2011. Attachment A - 1. A. Preliminary Future Transit Station Sub-area

The Atlanta BeltLine. Quarterly Briefing March @atlantabeltline. Reynoldstown Senior Affordable Housing

CITY PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF NEW ORLEANS MITCHELL J. LANDRIEU ROBERT D. RIVERS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR. City Planning Commission Staff Report

PROJECT SITE The Proposed Project includes the Allen and Pike Street malls between Delancey and South Streets (see Figure 2C-1).

CHAPTER 6 SECTION 4(f ) EVALUATION

Central Corridor LRT Project 3.0 SOCIAL EFFECTS

ARGENTA TRAIL (CSAH 28/63) REALIGNMENT SOUTH PROJECT (CP 63-25)

MENDING A RIFT: Urbanism for North Tulsa, Oklahoma UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE 2017 GRADUATE URBAN DESIGN STUDIO

Urban Design Brief to 1557 Gordon Street & 34 Lowes Road West

Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit Transit Oriented Development (BRTOD) Helmo Station Area Plan

Right-of-Way Acquisitions and Relocations Technical Memorandum

Appendix E: Proposed Refinements Visual and Aesthetics Technical Report. Durham-Orange Light Rail Transit Project

Planning Commission Staff Report March 15, 2007

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Urban Planning and Land Use

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF Gordon Street City of Guelph. Prepared on behalf of Ontario Inc. March 25, Project No. 1507

PROJECT BACKGROUND. Preliminary Design Scope and Tasks

COMMUNITY DESIGN. GOAL: Create livable and attractive communities. Intent

2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Midtown Greenway Land Use and Development Plan Executive Summary

PUBLIC HEARING. DRAFT Environmental Impact Statement. Matthews Memorial Baptist Church Washington, DC October 18, National Capital Region

CITY OF FORT COLLINS TYPE 1 ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING FINDINGS AND DECISION. Elevations Credit Union (2025 S. College Avenue)

Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis. Appendix A - Initially Considered Alternatives Screening

CITY PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF NEW ORLEANS MITCHELL J. LANDRIEU ROBERT D. RIVERS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR. City Planning Commission Staff Report

Preci nct P l ans Figure 56 Campus Aerial Photo, 2008 CAL STATE EAST BAY, HAYWARD CAMPUS MASTER PLAN

Grand Rounds History

East River Waterfront Esplanade and Piers New York, New York Draft Environmental Impact Statement

38 Queen s University Campus Master Plan Part 1

MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES BUILDING

2.1.8 Cultural Resources Regulatory Setting. Affected Environment, Environmental

1.0 Circulation Element

.+-M,.-,.+*,,A,--< ;:--t fi. ;,==: r ) i Q ; ',,(.:,*> 8 I-="' e$ ,; \!!&,,u

DRAFT. October Wheaton. Design Guidelines

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF 181 Burloak Drive, Oakville

APPENDIX F DRAFT SECTION 4(f) EVALUATION

V. Case Study Sites. Case Study Site Descriptions and Concepts. Case Study #1: Lake Street and Calhoun

Appendix L 2006 LADOT Pedestrian and Traffic Counts

Land Use Amendment in Southwood (Ward 11) at and Elbow Drive SW, LOC

HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT: Planning and Programming Division: An Inventory of Its Transportation Planning Studies

Missing Link Study Grand Rounds Parkway Planning and Design Introduction

Century Park to Ellerslie Road Preliminary Engineering

section five BEAUTIFICATION PLAN

QUEEN-RIVER SECONDARY PLAN

2900 Steeles Avenue East at Don Mills Road in the Town of Markham

Transcription:

CENTRAL CORRIDOR LRT STATE CAPITOL MALL HISTORIC FINAL MITIGATION PLAN February 2010 FINAL MITIGATION PLAN to address Adverse Effects of the Central Corridor LRT Project on the State Capitol Mall Historic District February 25, 2010

CENTRAL CORRIDOR LRT STATE CAPITOL MALL HISTORIC DISTRICT FINAL MITIGATION PLAN February 2010 INTRODUCTION This Mitigation Plan has been developed pursuant to stipulations in the Central Corridor Light Rail Transit (LRT) project Programmatic Agreement, executed by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP), the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office (MnSHPO) and the Metropolitan Council (Council) in June 2009. The Central Corridor LRT project is an approximately 11-mile LRT line that will serve the Minneapolis and St. Paul downtown areas, as well as the University of Minnesota (U of M) and the State Capitol complex. In downtown Minneapolis, it will integrate with the Hiawatha LRT line. There will be 20 stations along the line, including five shared with the existing Hiawatha LRT. Below-grade infrastructure to allow for later construction of three future infill stations will be provided and an operations and maintenance facility will be constructed as part of the project. The Central Corridor LRT project will be constructed by the Metropolitan Council. The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) is the lead federal agency in this undertaking. This Mitigation Plan has been developed to address adverse effects findings made by the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office (MnSHPO) regarding the Central Corridor LRT project s effects on the State Capitol Mall Historic District. ADVERSE EFFECTS NOTED Specifically, MnSHPO found, in a letter dated May 14, 2009 and addressed to the Federal Transit Administration, that: Two lawn panels, contributing elements of the historic district, will be removed for the project. In addition, we believe that the placement of the Rice Street Station along the edge of Leif Erickson Park, a contributing element of the historic district, introduces a structural mass that is out of character with the open nature of this landscape. To be sure, we are working with project designers and the Capitol Area Architectural Planning Board in an effort to reduce that effect through an appropriate station design. However, because the effect is based on placement of the mass of the station immediately adjacent to and over a portion of the open landscape space, the adverse effect can only be reduced, not eliminated. Mitigation for this effect will need to be developed pursuant to Stipulation IV of the [Programmatic] agreement. PROPERTY SETTING AND ASSOCIATION As summarized in Supplemental Historic Properties Investigations and Evaluations for the Central Corridor Light Rail Transit Project, the State Capitol Mall was first evaluated in 1995 as part of the Central Corridor project. At that time, it was recommended for National Register listing under Criterion A for its significance in community planning and development. The State Capitol Mall was characterized as originating from a plan by Cass Gilbert, modified by Clarence Johnston, Jr. and Arthur Nichols (see photos in Attachment A). In the supplemental investigations completed as part of the early stages Page 2 of 6

CENTRAL CORRIDOR LRT STATE CAPITOL MALL HISTORIC DISTRICT FINAL MITIGATION PLAN February 2010 of Central Corridor LRT preliminary engineering, and as published in the abovereferenced document, it was concluded that it would also be appropriate to recommend listing of the State Capitol Mall under Criterion C in the area of landscape architecture. Such a listing would include the area generally associated with the Mall, as well as the formal approaches, with their grassy medians and flanking boulevards. This recommendation recognizes that vision of Cass Gilbert in designing the State Capitol, of providing a setting inspired by the City Beautiful movement with plazas and axial and radial avenues that would culminate at the Capitol building. A separate investigation of Leif Erikson Lawn in the State Capitol Mall Historic District was also completed in early states of Central Corridor LRT preliminary engineering. As summarized in Supplemental Historic Properties Investigations and Evaluations for the Central Corridor Light Rail Transit Project, Leif Erikson Lawn sits on the state capitol grounds at the corner of University Avenue and Park Street North/Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard immediately west of the State Capitol building. From about 1890 to 1950, at least four streetcar lines (and probably earlier horsecars) traveled a diagonal route along Wabasha Street, which extended in front of the capitol and bordered the park site on the south. At the turn of the century, several buildings occupied the parcels north of Wabasha Street. These buildings were razed in the mid- 1920s and this portion of the site was designated as part of the State Capitol grounds at that time. The angled section of Wabasha bordering the site was removed around 1940, when the capitol approach was redeveloped and the area s streets realigned. The Leif Erikson monument was installed in 1949. Photographs taken during the dedication ceremony show only deciduous trees on the site. Currently, several mature conifers which appear to be Norway Pine and Norway spruce frame the monument on three sides and are clustered closely together on the north. These trees partially, or completely (depending on the angle) obscure the monument from view (see photos in Attachment A). DESCRIPTION OF CENTRAL CORRIDOR LRT AS IT AFFECTS PROPERTY SETTING AND ASSOCIATION The Central Corridor LRT alignment will pass along various boundaries of the State Capitol Mall Historic District within publicly-owned rights-of-way. To the north, it will be constructed on University Avenue. A portion of Leif Erikson lawn adjacent to University Avenue will be occupied by the eastbound Rice Street LRT station platform and by the LRT tracks. The Central Corridor LRT will depart University Avenue, traveling south along Robert Street. The LRT continues south on Robert Street (outside the district boundary) from the eastern terminus of Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard to 12 th Street. At 12 th Street, the Central Corridor LRT continues west, again along the district boundary. The Central Corridor LRT will head south on Cedar Street, operating in the center of Cedar Street (within the historic district from 12 th Street to 10 th Street) necessitating removal of the landscaped medians to install LRT tracks and the 10 th Street LRT station. The design of the Rice Street station, pedestrian approaches to the station, landscaping, and the relationship of landscape elements to the statue of Leif Erikson and to the State Capitol was the focus of consultation discussions with MnSHPO and other parties, Page 3 of 6

CENTRAL CORRIDOR LRT STATE CAPITOL MALL HISTORIC DISTRICT FINAL MITIGATION PLAN February 2010 including the Capitol Area Architectural and Planning Board (CAAPB). Another key area for focus of design consultation discussions was the placement of LRT catenary poles, pedestrian paths, safety fencing and other project infrastructure. Project design plans have been developed in response to issues raised at various consultation meetings, specifically: Softening the effects of the southern edge of the Rice Street station platform as it affects the landscape of Leif Erikson lawn. This was accomplished by creating three symmetrical lawn panels just south of the eastbound station platform, planting Honey Locust trees within the panels, and moving the sidewalk to follow the edge of the lawn panels; Creating other pedestrian amenities (as illustrated in the figure that follows) that restore pedestrian connections to the statue of Leif Erikson and the State Capitol; Altering the standard LRT station design for the Rice Street station by creating two entry points on the eastbound station platform for more seamless access into the Leif Erikson Lawn; Minimizing any adverse viewshed impacts to the north face of the State Capitol from Capitol Boulevard by altering the east-west sidewalk north of University Avenue to guide pedestrians through landscaped materials away from the terminus of Capitol Boulevard thereby avoiding the need for a safety railing at this location; and, Shifting the LRT tracks at the back of the Capitol to save the relocation of a western granite pier and circular staircase. MITIGATION OF ADVERSE EFFECTS IDENTIFIED This proposed mitigation plan response to adverse effects noted to the historic State Capitol Mall landscape and is comprised of two elements. 1. Historic Landscape Documentation The historic landscape of the State Capitol Mall Historic District will be documented by development of a scholarly article providing an in-depth examination of the history of the development, implementation and evolution of the historic landscape of the State Capitol Mall Historic District. This article is intended to document the significant historic elements of the landscape in this district and provide information for use by historians and contemporary landscape architects and planners working within this historic district. The article will be written by a historian or architectural historian meeting the Secretary of the Interior s Standards Professional Qualification Standards and will be written to the publication standards for a scholarly journal. The Met Council will consult with MnSHPO in making the selection of a historian to write the article. Page 4 of 6

CENTRAL CORRIDOR LRT STATE CAPITOL MALL HISTORIC DISTRICT FINAL MITIGATION PLAN February 2010 Upon completion, the article will be submitted by the Met Council for consideration of publication to an appropriate journal or journals (such as Preservation, APT Bulletin, Minnesota History, and/or the Minnesota Preservationist). A copy of the article will be submitted to MnSHPO and the Capitol Area Architectural and Planning Board (CAAPB). 2. Landscaping Improvements As noted in several consultation meetings with MnSHPO and the CAAPB, the mature conifers that surround the statue of Leif Erikson have the effect of substantially screening the statue from public view. The follow figure illustrates the proposed removal of several of the mature conifers surrounding the statue of Leif Erikson, thereby improving sight lines to the statue from both the Minnesota State Capitol Building and to the Norwegian Evangelical Lutheran Church (Christ Lutheran Church). SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS The actions summarized above and illustrated in the figure that follows are intended to respond to adverse effects of the Central Corridor LRT project on the State Capitol Mall Historic District. This mitigation plan, as accepted and approved by the FTA and MnSHPO pursuant to obligations stipulated in the Central Corridor LRT Programmatic Agreement will be implemented coincident with construction of the Central Corridor LRT project. Page 5 of 6

Central Corridor Light Rail Transit Rice Street Station and Leif Erikson Lawn Coniferous Trees Removed N 1

Attachment A Historic Photos, Maps, and Other Source Data

Cedar Street in 1953 as demolition began. Photo: Minnesota Historical Society Collections Cedar Street in 1954 after the planted medians have been installed. Photo: Minnesota Historical Society Collections Supplemental Historic Property Investigations and Evaluations for CCLRT Project: Minnesota State Capitol Mall Historic District: Evaluation of Approaches and Boundary Delineation Hess, Roise and Company Page 79

Aerial view of the Capitol with Summit Mall ending at St. Anthony Avenue at the left and Cedar Street at the right, ca. 1954. Photo: Minnesota Historical Society Collections Aerial view of the Capitol looking towards downtown along Cedar Street. A bridge crosses Interstate 94 in the middle ground. Photo: Minnesota Historical Society Collections Supplemental Historic Property Investigations and Evaluations for CCLRT Project: Minnesota State Capitol Mall Historic District: Evaluation of Approaches and Boundary Delineation Hess, Roise and Company Page 80

John Ireland Boulevard from Constitution Avenue (now Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard) to the Cathedral of Saint Paul in about 1970. Photo: Minnesota Historical Society Collections Rebuilding the Cedar Street bridge over Interstate 94 in 1992. Photo: Minnesota Historical Society Collections Supplemental Historic Property Investigations and Evaluations for CCLRT Project: Minnesota State Capitol Mall Historic District: Evaluation of Approaches and Boundary Delineation Hess, Roise and Company Page 81

The dotted line indicates the jurisdiction of the CAAPB. The red line indicates the boundaries of the Minnesota State Capitol Mall Historic District including the approaches along John Ireland Boulevard and Cedar Street. The line is based on discussions with Mn/DOT-CRU and SHPO. Supplemental Historic Property Investigations and Evaluations for CCLRT Project: Minnesota State Capitol Mall Historic District: Evaluation of Approaches and Boundary Delineation Hess, Roise and Company Page 82

Vicinity of present-day Leif Erikson Lawn, intersection of University Avenue and Park Avenue (presently Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard), Saint Paul (Sanborn Map Company, 1885) Area of present-day Leif Erikson Lawn, Saint Paul, State Capitol grounds at right (Sanborn Map Company, 1903) Supplemental Historic Property Investigations and Evaluations for CCLRT Project: Leif Erikson Lawn in the State Capitol Mall Historic District: A Historical Study Hess, Roise and Company Page 88

Area of Leif Erikson Lawn, Saint Paul (Sanborn Map Company, 1926, updated to1939) Area of Leif Erikson Lawn, Saint Paul (Sanborn Map Company, 1926, updated to 1951) Supplemental Historic Property Investigations and Evaluations for CCLRT Project: Leif Erikson Lawn in the State Capitol Mall Historic District: A Historical Study Hess, Roise and Company Page 89

State capitol building with Wabasha Street streetcar in foreground, 1910. Photo: Minnesota Historical Society Collections State capitol grounds, Saint Paul, ca. 1930; area of present-day Leif Erikson Lawn at center left. Photo: Minnesota Historical Society Collections Supplemental Historic Property Investigations and Evaluations for CCLRT Project: Leif Erikson Lawn in the State Capitol Mall Historic District: A Historical Study Hess, Roise and Company Page 90

State capitol grounds, Saint Paul, 1936; area of present-day Leif Erikson Lawn at center left. Photo: Minnesota Historical Society Collections State capitol area during redevelopment, ca. 1950; Leif Erikson Lawn at upper right, prior to abandonment of Wabasha Street. Photo: Minnesota Historical Society Collections Supplemental Historic Property Investigations and Evaluations for CCLRT Project: Leif Erikson Lawn in the State Capitol Mall Historic District: A Historical Study Hess, Roise and Company Page 91

Sculptor John K. Daniels working on statue of Leif Erikson, ca. 1948. Photo: Minnesota Historical Society Collections Installation of statue at State Capitol Grounds, October 1949. Photo: Minnesota Historical Society Collections Supplemental Historic Property Investigations and Evaluations for CCLRT Project: Leif Erikson Lawn in the State Capitol Mall Historic District: A Historical Study Hess, Roise and Company Page 92

Two images of the Leif Erikson Monument unveiling and dedication, October 9, 1949. Photo: Minnesota Historical Society Collections Supplemental Historic Property Investigations and Evaluations for CCLRT Project: Leif Erikson Lawn in the State Capitol Mall Historic District: A Historical Study Hess, Roise and Company Page 93

Leif Erikson monument, state capitol grounds, Saint Paul, 1950 Photo: Minnesota Historical Society Collections Supplemental Historic Property Investigations and Evaluations for CCLRT Project: Leif Erikson Lawn in the State Capitol Mall Historic District: A Historical Study Hess, Roise and Company Page 94

Leif Erikson Lawn, looking west from atop State Capitol, 1959. Photo: Minnesota Historical Society Collections Note deciduous trees, sidewalks through park, and vehicles along Wabasha Street. Looking northwest towards University Avenue and Rice Street from near southeast corner of Leif Erikson Lawn, December 2007. Leif Erikson monument stands within the grove of trees in the center of the photograph. Photo: Erin Hanafin Berg Supplemental Historic Property Investigations and Evaluations for CCLRT Project: Leif Erikson Lawn in the State Capitol Mall Historic District: A Historical Study Hess, Roise and Company Page 95

Leif Erikson monument, looking north from diagonal sidewalk at southern border of park, December 2007. Photos: Erin Hanafin Berg Looking northeast along walkway leading from Leif Erikson monument to Christ Lutheran Church, December 2007. Supplemental Historic Property Investigations and Evaluations for CCLRT Project: Leif Erikson Lawn in the State Capitol Mall Historic District: A Historical Study Hess, Roise and Company Page 96

Leif Erikson monument, looking east toward State Capitol, December 2007. Photo: Erin Hanafin Berg Supplemental Historic Property Investigations and Evaluations for CCLRT Project: Leif Erikson Lawn in the State Capitol Mall Historic District: A Historical Study Hess, Roise and Company Page 97

Attachment B Central Corridor LRT Updated 60 Percent Design Sheets