AFAA Webinar - Poole Fire Protection March 28, 2012

Similar documents
ICC Annual Conference October 2016

MNEC NFPA 72 WHITE PAPER

NFPA Siemens Industry, Inc. All rights reserved. usa.siemens.com/infrastructure-cities

Addressing Sound Masking Requirements in the National Fire Alarm and Signaling Code and UL Standards

Functional Challenges of Integrating Mass Notification and Fire Alarm Systems

Questions/Comments for Richard Roux from Webinar on 7/11/13

CFAA Annual Seminar 05/05/2010

AlertWave Smart Wireless Solutions for Today s Campus Whether you are a large university

ALARM SYSTEMS AND EVACUATION PLANS SELF INSPECTION CHECKLIST

Mass Notification Systems

4/9/2015. Introductions. Introductions Scott Lord Executive Officer, All Systems. Mass Notification And Emergency Communications (MNEC)

NFPA 72 Code Changes vs 2013

IMPROVING EMERGENCY NOTIFICATION PROCESSES

Second Revision No. 102-NFPA [ Global Comment ] Submitter Information Verification. Committee Statement

Evacuation and Lockdown Plan

Designing for Intelligibility & Energy Efficiency Eaton, All Rights Reserved.

Advanced Fire Alarm Systems Training Program Outline (5 Day)

Mass Notification Overview

First Revision No. 82-NFPA [ Section No ] Submitter Information Verification. Committee Statement. 2 of /21/2013 1:03 PM

UCLA Policy 130: Emergency Notifications (BruinAlert) DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW

AlertWave. visiplex. From a Public Address System to an Emergency Communication System... The AlertWave system advantages:

EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN Revision 4.0

Emergency Communications

FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS & 780 CMR. Dave LeBlanc, PE, FSFPE March 17, 2015

DESIGN AND O&M: MASS NOTIFICATION SYSTEMS

A WARNING ANNEX (1.0)

"VOICE OF SECURITY: Trends In Intercom, Public Address, and Mass Notification Emergency Communications

Fire Alarm Intelligibility. Chris Nolan

Fact File 75. Published Document PD CEN/TS 54-32:2015 Fire detection and fire alarm systems

MOBILE FIRE - RESCUE DEPARTMENT FIRE CODE ADMINISTRATION

5/9/2017. Understanding Risk Analysis and Emergency Planning and How They Affect the Design of Emergency Communications Systems

Warning. Annex GRAYSON COLLEGE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT

Code Maroon Emergency Notification System August 2013

ALERiTY. Mass notification. Integrated IP-based network solutions

Emergency Notification Plan. Developed By: Cleveland State University Police Department Office of Emergency Management

Policy and Procedure. Emergency Notification and Response Policy. Policy Statement

UNIFIED FACILITIES CRITERIA (UFC) DESIGN AND O&M: MASS NOTIFICATION SYSTEMS

SP40S-D. Kingfisher Company, inc. Features: Description:

Applying Performance-based Fire Alarm System Design Part 4

DESIGN AND O&M: MASS NOTIFICATION SYSTEMS

1. Floor above/floor below notification. 2. Private alarm notification. 3. Not Used 4. Voice alarm notification. 5. Not Used.

Fire Alarm System Fundamentals

X0.01 Emergency Management. Approved: September 27, 2002 Revised: July 15, Next Scheduled Review: July 15, 2014 PROCEDURE STATEMENT

First Revision No. 339-NFPA [ Section No. 2.2 ]

Florida Building Code Chapter 9 Fire Protection Systems Advanced Course

2010 NFPA Conference & Expo, Las Vegas

ESF 15: EMERGENCY PUBLIC INFORMATION

NFPA Changes


Frequently Asked Questions

EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS SUPPLEMENTARY RECORD OF INSPECTION AND TESTING

Students often rece/ve notification of a weather or security event n multiple formats, including on their laptops. All photos: Siemens

SAFEPATH SAFEPATH. Emergency communications system

BUILDING EMERGENCY PLAN

Session VI Smart safety systems

Fire Alarm System Inspection and Testing Report

EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN

Guide for. Emergency and Disaster Response

Automatic Fire Alarm Association Webinar On Inspection, Testing, And Maintenance Of Fire Alarm Systems

Hospital Fire Alarm Systems Recurring Misapplications and Misused Requirements

Department of Emergency Management Policy #2 Emergency Notification and Alerting

Department of Emergency Management Policy #2 Emergency Notification and Alerting

MULTI-PHASED FIRE ALARM AND MASS NOTIFICATION SYSTEM UPGRADES: The Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) and Proper Planning

Second Revision No. 104-NFPA [ Section No ] Submitter Information Verification. Committee Statement

Enter Department Name Emergency Action Plan

Update all extract references to NFPA documents (including NFPA 72) in Chapter 3 and related annex material to the latest editions.

Second Correlating Revision No. 21-NFPA [ Global Input ]

Solutions for Mass Notification Systems

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

AGENDA NFPA TECHNICAL COMMITTEE ON NOTIFICATION APPLIANCES. Report on Comments Meeting, October 13-14, Richmond Marriott, Richmond, VA

Significant Changes to the 2012 IFC Semiconductor Fabrication Facilities. Scott Stookey Senior Technical Staff International Code Council, Austin TX

Campus Emergency Procedures Guide

National Fire Protection Association. 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA Phone: Fax:

BC Alert System Frequently Asked Questions 06/14//2017

Surviving Survivability A User s Guide to Survivable Fire Alarm Circuits Larry D. Rietz, SET 23 May 2018

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY, FLEXIBILITY, AND BUILT-IN SURVIVABILITY

ENHANCED SECURITY WITH INTERCOM & PUBLIC ADDRESS

Changes in NFPA

Crisis Response Plan Greenwood Center 207 West Park Avenue Greenwood, MS

Emergency Support Function #2 Communication

BUILDING EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN. for Your Building Name

The WAVE Plus Instant Notification System for Schools and Colleges

A COMPARISON OF FIRE ALARM SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS IN THE US AND UK. James R. Lugar Jr., P.E. Rolf Jensen & Associates, Inc. SFPE 2012 Savannah, GA

ALERiTY Wide-Area Mass Notification. Mass notification. Providing industry-leading intelligibility

AFMG. Design for Speech Intelligibility Using Software Modeling. Stefan Feistel, Bruce C. Olson AHNERT FEISTEL MEDIA GROUP

Emergency Response Floor Leader Training

STUDY AND TEST MATERIAL FOR THE. FA2 and FA4 ASSESSMENTS. (Fire Alarm On-Site and Business Cert. Holder) June 14, 2017

Emergency Action Plan

2. The Group F occupancy has have an a combined occupant load of 500 or more above or below the lowest level of exit discharge.

DOD FIRE SERVICE CERTIFICATION SYSTEM LESSON PLAN 7. Fire Alarm and Communication

Minimum Standards for Engineers Practicing Fire Protection Engineering in the State of Oklahoma September 14, 2016

Kaufert Laboratory Building Emergency Plan

Physics Department. Emergency Action Plan & Evacuation Guide. In compliance with: California Code of Regulations. Title 8, Section 3220

University Design Standard Fire Alarm Systems

Interactive Technologies Inc North 2nd Street North St. Paul, MN Technical Manuals Online! -

Nova Scotia Fire Dispatch Minimum Standards (2017)

FACILITY OF EMERGENCY PLAN. (Template)

Warning and Notification Plan. Custer County Colorado

Low Rise Residential occupancies are required to perform one fire safety training and one evacuation drill annually

Emergency Evacuation Plan

Transcription:

Jack Poole, PE Understanding Emergency Communication Systems, Risk Analysis and Voice Intelligibility March 28, 2012 Introduction Jack Poole, PE Graduate from Univ. of Md., BS in FPE Poole Fire Protection Est. in 1991 Licensed PE in FPE (48 states) Member of NFPA, SFPE, ICC and ABPA Member of multiple NFPA Technical Committees, including NFPA 72, NAC NFPA Board of Directors, Aviation Section 26 Years of Fire Protection Experience 2 Topics to Be Covered s (ECS) Paradigm Shift and Industry Changes What is an Emergency Communication (Mass Notification) System? In-Building, Wide Area and Distributed Recipient Systems What is a Risk Analysis, and Why? Understanding of Intelligibility and How to Test Intelligibility 3 Voice Intelligibility 1

Weather Events Joplin Tornado Hurricane Katrina Japan Flood Unfortunate Historic Events Terroristic Attacks World Trade Center 93 & 01 Yale University (Unabomber) Murrah Building 4 Unfortunate Historic Events Nuclear & Chemical Attacks, Spills & Contamination Bhopal Gas Tragedy, India Three Mile Island Base/Campus Shooters and Snipers Virginia Tech Fort Hood 5 Paradigm Shift September 11, 2001 was a major driver Forced Fire Departments to rethink the way they operate and respond to incidents Re-evaluation by Owners and Designers of how to make buildings safer Being prepared for the Emergency Event NFPA 1600, Standard on Disaster/Emergency Management & Business Continuity Programs Adequate Communication Capabilities 6 Voice Intelligibility 2

Industry Changes NFPA 72 2010 Edition Significant NFPA 72 changes, now called National Fire Alarm and Signaling Code Major Changes in format and addition of 3 new chapters (from 11 chapter to 29 chapters 15 not used) Circuits and Pathways Emergency Control Functions & Interfaces Emergency Communications Systems (ECS) 7 Industry Changes NFPA 72 2010 Edition: Chapter 18 Notification Appliances Significant Chapter 18 changes (old Chapter 7) Intelligibility Designed and Measured in accordance with ISO 7240-19 Established minimum indoor Intelligibility Values AHJ has authority to change minimum values 8 Industry Changes NFPA 72 2010 Edition: Chapter 24 ECS 2007 NFPA 72 Annex E, Mass Notification Systems Replaced by Chapter 24, Emergency Communications Systems Content from Chapter 6, Protected Premises Fire Alarm Systems Emergency Voice Alarm Communications One- and Two-Way Communication Service Chapter 24 is a complete set of requirements for emergency communications systems including requirements from other chapters by reference 9 Voice Intelligibility 3

Industry Changes UL 2572 Standard for Safety for Mass Notification Systems Think of it as the UL 864 for Mass Notification System Control Units Equipment Standard 10 Industry Changes UL 2572: Main Evaluation Points Construction Protection Against Injury to Persons Performance General Operation Tests Common Requirements Other tests Performance Tests HPSA Manufacturing and Production Line Tests Marking and Instructions 11 Industry Changes UL 2572: Why is it needed? ECS is different than Fire Alarm Different functions Different purpose Different equipment 12 Voice Intelligibility 4

Industry Changes Clery Act: History The "Clery Act" is named in memory of 19 year old university freshman Jeanne Ann Clery who was raped and murdered while asleep in her residence hall room on April 5, 1986 Jeanne's parents, Connie and Howard, discovered students hadn t been told about 38 violent crimes on their daughter's campus in the three years before her murder Crime Awareness and Campus Security Act of 1990 13 Industry Changes Clery Act: Connection to ECS 2008 Amendment - A statement of current campus policies regarding immediate emergency response and evacuation procedures, including the use of electronic and cellular communication Immediately notify the campus community upon the confirmation of a significant emergency or dangerous situation involving an immediate threat to the health or safety of students or staff occurring on the campus Publicize emergency response and evacuation procedures on an annual basis in a manner designed to reach students and staff Test emergency response and evacuation procedures on an annual basis 14 Industry Changes Clery Act: What does that mean? Notify campus community immediately College campuses turn to ECS to meet this requirement 15 Voice Intelligibility 5

Questions If FA and MNS is integrated into a combined system, will the control unit have to comply with both UL 864 and UL 2572? Are they any questions at this point? 16 What is it? A (ECS), also known as Mass Notification (MNS), is a system designed to provide real time instructions and information to a large number of people p spread out over a large complex, campus or multi-building facility in the event of an emergency May use voice communications, visible signals, text, graphics, tactile or other communications methods 17 Purpose Provide communication capability in the event of any type of emergency Initiate evacuation, relocation, or to provide information on fire, weather, terrorist events, biological, chemical or nuclear emergencies to occupants Assist emergency responders to deal with real time conditions during an emergency 18 Voice Intelligibility 6

Two Types of ECS One-Way System recipient doesn t have ability to provide information to sender (e.g., speakers that sound a tone, prerecorded, or live voice message) Two-Way System allows sender and recipient to communicate with each other (e.g., radios and telephones used by police & fire agencies) 19 What Drives it? Owners NFPA 72 Chapter 24 (2010) UFC 4-010-01 UFC 4-021-01, includes intelligibility performance criteria i Clery Act (kind of) 20 Key Elements of ECS In-Building ECS Audible and/or Visible Integration with other systems Wide Area ECS Also called Campus or City High Power Speaker Arrays Distributed Recipient Emails PC Pop ups Instant Messages Pagers & Phones SMS Messages (short message service) 21 Voice Intelligibility 7

In-Building ECS Typical Arrangement 22 In-Building ECS Components: Control Panel Often combined with FA system Sends digital voice messages to building occupants Send and receive digital messages and live page from the Campus or Base Wide System Has the ability to activate strobes and text displays 23 In-Building ECS Components: Local Operating Console Perform live paging to meet the specific emergencies Minimum of eight (8) switches for activating messages and a microphone Protected in a small wall mounted enclosure (nonlockable) 24 Voice Intelligibility 8

In-Building ECS Components: Notification Provide a clear strobe for fire alarm events and an amber strobe for mass notification events (Military Requirement for Army and Air Force only) 25 In-Building ECS Components: Displays Service people with hearing disabilities by providing a method of sending the Emergency Communication Alert messages 26 Wide Area ECS (also called Campus Wide ECS) Send Digital Voice Messages to any HPSA or In-Building ECS Receive emergency info (e.g. fire alarm data) from any In-Building ECS Have a Graphical Interface to display the campus and information for the operator Send live messages to any HPSA or In- Building ECS Print out all system events 27 Voice Intelligibility 9

HPSA Zones (High Power Speaker Arrays) Inform people outside of buildings Can send a voice message to individual HPSA s or to all outdoor zones Strategically locate throughout campus or facility Each location should be at a height to be unobstructed by buildings and trees 28 Distributed Recipient ECS Interface with other Systems/Functions Systems / Functions include: PC Pop ups Messages to Social Networks Pager Interface Email Server Instant t Messages SMS Text Messaging to Cell Phones VoIP Telephone Systems to Voice Mail 29 Benefits of Combination Fire Alarm/ECS Built-in compatibility Easier to program Easier to interact properly Survivable Paging g systems are not built to survive attack Distributed messaging and amplifiers increases survivability Expandable/flexible Scalable Ease of reconfigure 30 Voice Intelligibility 10

Multiple Channels Available Utilize multiple audio \ circuits to announce different messages simultaneously to multiple areas For example: ZONE Message A, Evacuate the building using the South entrance Message B, Evacuate the building using the North entrance Message C, Do not evacuate the building, wait for further instruction 31 Types of ECS Technology Tier 1 Immediate & intrusive Sirens, indoor/outdoor Loudspeakers Fire voice evacuation Electronic signage Code compliant Tier 2 Personal alerting SMS Text (cell phones) Computer pop-ups Tone alert radios Email broadcast (Internet) Automated voice dialing & text messaging 32 Types of ECS Technology Tier 3 Tier 4 Public alerting Locally relevant Sat/AM/FM radio broadcasts alerting Sat/off-air TV broadcasts Handheld bullhorns Location-specific Radio cell phones Text messages Two-way radios 33 Voice Intelligibility 11

Who needs it or is using it? College campuses Universities Military bases Corporate campuses Large manufacturing facilities 34 Owner Responsibilities Safety to life and property Per NFPA 72 (2010), hire a qualified System Designer who is Registered, licensed, or certified by a state/ local authority Certified by a nationally recognized certification organization acceptable to the AHJ Factory trained and certified for fire alarm system design and ECS design of the specific type/brand of the system and who are acceptable to the AHJ 35 Military Projects UFC 4-021-01 Requirements for System Designers ECS/MNS shall be designed under the supervision of a registered fire protection engineer (FPE), a registered fire protection engineer (FPE) having at least four years of current experience in the design of fire protection and detection systems, or by an engineering technologist qualified at NICET Level IV in fire alarm systems 36 Voice Intelligibility 12

I think I need it, now what? Where do I start? What do I need? Who am I trying to protect? What is my objective? Notify Evacuate Stay in place Don t plan for the emergency situation (there are too many possibilities.) Plan for protecting the people in your charge. 37 Understanding An Emergency Event Understand and consider how: An event may progress An event may change Example: Sep. 11, 2011 Prepared for an emergency event in one building, not both Fire Department directed occupants to remain in the South Tower 38 Risk Analysis What is it? The design of the emergency communication/mass notification system shall be specific to the nature and anticipated risks of each facility for which it is designed The design of the mass notification system shall include the preparation of a design brief that is prepared utilizing recognized performance-based design practices The Risk Analysis process should include all applicable Stakeholders (team approach) 39 Voice Intelligibility 13

Risk Analysis Stakeholders Any individual, group, or organization that might affect, be affected by, or perceive itself to be affected by the risk, such as: Authority Having Jurisdiction Facility Owner / Users / Employees Facility Maintenance Staff (I-T-M) Emergency Responders Insurance Company or Insurers Fire Protection Design Professional (FPE) Design & Construction Team 40 Risk Analysis Stakeholders: Interests What are their interests? Combining/reconciling interests? Consensus among the group? 41 Risk Analysis Process of Performing A Risk Analysis 1. Identify the range of hazards, threats, or perils: Identify the hazards, threats, or perils that impact or might impact your organization, infrastructure and/or surrounding area 2. Determine the potential impact of each hazard, threat, or peril by: Estimating the relative severity, frequency, and vulnerability of each hazard, threat, or peril Estimate how vulnerable your people, operations, property and/or environment are to each hazard, threat, or peril 42 Voice Intelligibility 14

Risk Analysis Process of Performing A Risk Analysis 3. Categorize each hazard, threat, or peril according to how severe it is, how frequently it occurs, and how vulnerable you are 4. Develop strategies to deal with the most significant hazards, threats, or perils Develop strategies to prevent, mitigate, prepare, respond and recover hazards, threats, or perils that impact or might impact your organization and its people, operations, property, and environment 43 Risk Analysis Assessing the Risk To fully understand the risk(s) that you are attempting to be addressed, you should develop some questions to ask. The answers should then be evaluated by a licensed professional that is familiar with Risk Assessments. The following slides provide a list of questions that might help assess the level of risk and type of system desired. 44 Risk Analysis Assessing the Risk: The Questions What is the type of emergency event? What is the urgency of the emergency event? What is the anticipated or expected severity of the emergency event? What is the certainty of the emergency event, is it happening now? What types of natural disasters, accidental hazards, or human-caused events could provide life threatening scenarios? 45 Voice Intelligibility 15

Risk Analysis Assessing the Risk: The Questions What is the location of the event or from what direction is the event approaching? Based on the potential hazards or incident, which occupants and personnel should be notified? What zone or areas of the complex or building should receive the emergency message(s)? What instructions or message should we send to the personnel we are notifying? 46 Risk Analysis Assessing the Risk: The Questions What is the expected performance or reliability of the system? Is a voice system the best to convey the message or desired actions? Intelligible? Remember, when an emergency event occurs, the response must be immediate and deliberate, and there is no time for indecision. Therefore, keep it SIMPLE. 47 Risk Analysis Sample Outline 48 Voice Intelligibility 16

Questions Of the stakeholders you discussed, who is best to lead the Risk Analysis? Any other questions at this point? 49 In-Building ECS Design Things to Consider: Voice vs. Non-Voice Type of Occupants to Notify Hearing Impaired Multiple Languages Number of Occupants Inhabited Building Building Size High-rise Building Type of Building Hard Surfaces Large Open Areas 50 In-Building ECS Design Things to Consider: Local and Remote Control Access to Control Equipment Staff only Staff and Visitors Emergency Responders Capabilities of Control Equipment Initiate Messages Live voice announcements Location of Control Equipment Security, Manager Office Areas/rooms accessible to the Public Secure rooms (located Electrical room) 51 Voice Intelligibility 17

In-Building ECS Design Things to Consider: Notification Types Locations Audible Areas/rooms (Narrowband Signaling) accessible to Visual the Public Textual Staff/work rooms Effectiveness Audibility Intelligibility Messages Zoning Number of floors Building Size 52 In-Building ECS Design Visual Notification Strobes Used in high-noise environments, in areas occupied by hearing impaired individuals, or in areas where audible may not be desired (i.e. hospital operating rooms) Selectable Candela Output (15, 15/75, 30, 75, 110) Clear verses Amber or other color Text Messages Signs or Boards Only used to supplement audible and visual 53 In-Building ECS Design Effectiveness: Audibility Measured in decibels (dba) Public Mode Audibility Sound level at least 15 dba above the average ambient sound level or 5 dba above the maximum sound level having a duration of 60 seconds Private Mode Audibility Sound level at least 10 dba above the average ambient sound level or 5 dba above the maximum sound level having a duration of 60 seconds 54 Voice Intelligibility 18

In-Building ECS Design Effectiveness: Intelligibility The capability of being understood or comprehended (distinguishable and understandable) Predicted according to Standardized Transmission Index (STI) or Common Intelligibility Score (CIS) Better to use lower wattage settings and add additional speakers Higher wattage settings will create more reverberation and distortion 55 In-Building ECS Design Effectiveness: Messages Evacuation message is required to be preceded and followed by three-pulse temporal pattern emergency evacuation signal The message shall be repeated at least three times Public Areas Audible and Visual Notification Employee Areas - Staff rooms or office areas where non-accessible to the public are typically permitted to have audible notification appliances only 56 NFPA 72 Design Considerations Intelligibility: History NFPA 72 1996, addressed Emergency Voice/Alarm Communication, no Intelligibility Requirements for these voice system NFPA 72 1999, addressed in Section 4-3.1.5 Section 4-3.1.5 - Emergency voice/alarm communications systems shall be capable of the reproduction of prerecorded, d synthesized, or live (for example, microphone, telephone handset, and radio) messages with voice intelligibility. NFPA 72 2002 and 2007 Section 7.4.1.4. (Basically the Same at 1999, Section 4-3.1.5) Intelligibility is REQUIRED 57 Voice Intelligibility 19

NFPA 72 Design Considerations Intelligibility: Technical Concepts Important building characteristics: occupancy type, ceiling height, surface features, etc. Factors related to talker/listener transmission path: 58 NFPA 72 Design Considerations Intelligibility: Definitions and Annex Text Acoustically Distinguishable Space (ADS). An emergency communication system notification zone, or subdivision thereof, that might be an enclosed or otherwise physically y defined space, or that may be distinguished from other spaces because of different acoustical, environmental or use characteristics such as reverberation time and ambient sound pressure level. ADS is important new terminology to understand and apply when both designing and testing voice systems. 59 NFPA 72 Design Considerations Intelligibility: Chapter 18 18.4.10 *Voice Intelligibility. 18.4.10.1* Acoustically Distinguishable Spaces (ADS) shall be determined by the system designer during the planning and design of all emergency communications systems. 18.4.10.2 Each ADS shall be identified as requiring or not requiring voice intelligibility. 18.4.10.3* Where required by the authority having jurisdiction, ADS assignments shall be submitted for review and approval. 60 Voice Intelligibility 20

NFPA 72 Design Considerations Audio Intelligibility When designing to meet intelligibility requirements, it is better to use lower wattage settings and add additional speakers. Higher wattage settings will create more reverberation and distortion. Army & Air Force CIS = 0.8 Navy & Marines CIS = 0.7 61 ECS Testing Initial Acceptance Testing All new systems are to be inspected and tested The AHJ is to be notified prior to the initial acceptance test Reacceptance Testing When an initiating device, notification appliance, or control relay is added, should be functionally tested When an initiating device, notification appliance, or control relay is deleted, another device, appliance, or control relay on the circuit is to be operated. Modifications or repairs to control equipment hardware warrant re-test of control equipment 62 Intelligibility Testing Test Methods Two basic categories of intelligibility testing: Subject (human) based testing; and Instrument based test methods (used in this project) Well documented in literature Relationships established 63 Voice Intelligibility 21

Intelligibility Testing Key Terminology STI Speech Transmission Index A rating of speech transmission quality with respect to intelligibility. STI-PA Speech Transmission Index-Public Address a signal used to be able to consistently measure STI or intelligibility Audibility Test - Measurement of the sound pressure level of a tone signal in accordance with the requirements of NFPA 72. 64 Intelligibility Testing Testing Equipment Audio Source Unit (ASU) or Talkbox STI-PA Audio Recording (CD) Field Test Meter (analyzer) 65 Intelligibility Testing Acceptability Criteria 90% of the readings must pass Minimum of 0.45 STI (0.65 CIS) Average of 0.50 STI (0.70 CIS) Designed to Test the System Design/Components not input signal 66 Voice Intelligibility 22

Intelligibility Testing Challenges with Testing Areas of high ambient sound pressure levels ( noise ) may be incapable of meeting the Acceptability Criteria. Impulse sounds made during measurements may impact measurement accuracy or cause instrument error. (Example: door or file drawer closing). Natural variation in ambient noise levels may affect the results. 67 Intelligibility Testing Test Method - Occupied vs. Unoccupied Preferred method is to perform testing when furnished and occupied. Perform Testing It is possible to test when Unoccupied Gather Ambient Gather Ambient with STIPA Gather Occupied Obtain the Corrected STI Value* *Note Computer Program Calculation 68 Intelligibility Testing Test Equipment Calibration Insert the STI-PA Test Tone CD into the ASU Place the ASU microphone 1 from speaker Apply power to the ASU & activate the STI- PA signal Adjust the ASU volume so that t the STI Analyzer s reading is approximately 92 dba Keeping the analyzer in approximately the same position, measure the STI The equipment is working properly if the reading is greater than 0.91 STI or 0.96 CIS. Perform 3 tests 69 Voice Intelligibility 23

Post-Construction Owner Responsibilities Research shows that the message is one of the most important factors in determining the effectiveness of a warning system Develop effective emergency messages that provide the following content: Information on the hazard and danger Guidance on what people should do Description of the location of the risk or hazard An idea of when they need to act The name of the source of the warning (who is giving it) Warning style is also crucial specific, consistent, certain, clear, and accurate 70 Post-Construction Owner Responsibilities Operator / User Training System Maintenance and Inspection System Testing 71 Questions Does the code (NFPA 72) require the intelligibility of a voice system to be tested/measured with a meter? What companies manufacture Intelligibility Meters? Any other questions at this point? 72 Voice Intelligibility 24

Contact Information Jack Poole, PE jpoole@poolefire.com Poole Fire Protection www.poolefire.com 19910 W. 161 st Street Olathe, Kansas 66062 913-747-2050 Direct 913-208-2596 - Cell 73 Thank You Voice Intelligibility 25