NOTICE TO FRUIT GROWERS AND NURSERYMEN RELATIVE TO THE NAMING AND RELEASE OF THE US-942 CITRUS ROOTSTOCK

Similar documents
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Agricultural Research Service Washington, D.C

Field Evaluation of Rootstocks in USDA Program

US-812 Citrus Rootstock

5 Rootstocks. Choosing a Rootstock. General Notes on Rootstock Descriptions. Mikeal L. Roose

! Citrus Notes !!!! !!!!! !!! November 2014! Vol ! Inside this Issue: "!

Establishing new trees possible impacts of rootstock propagation method on young tree growth Ute Albrecht

Alternatives to Rootstock Propagation by Seed What can we expect?

Rootstocks Affect the 17-Year Survival and Performance of Valencia Trees Grown in Immokalee

US-812 Citrus Rootstock

ROOTSTOCK EFFECTS ON HAMLIN AND VALENCIA ORANGE TREES GROWING AT CENTRAL RIDGE AND FLATWOODS LOCATIONS

Apple Rootstock Trials in British Columbia, Canada

Swingle Citrumelo Decline in Belize

Your Florida Dooryard Citrus Guide - Young Tree Care 1

New Somatic Hybrid Rootstock Candidates for Tree-size Control and High Juice Quality

History. Citrus Breeding. Rootstock. Breeding Goals. Rootstock Hybrids. Carrizo Citrange

The question posed in this slide remains critical and demanding especially in the face of HLB or greening disease and the possible role of rootstock

Importance of Citrus Rootstocks

3. M9 NIC29 A virus-free Belgian subclone of M9 that is slightly more vigorous than most others M9 clones.

9 New Citrus Rootstocks Descriptions and Data. UFR 1 (U.S. Patent Pending)

Managing Soil Borne Diseases

Archival copy: for current recommendations see or your local extension office.

Evaluation of new low- and moderate-chill peach cultivars in coastal southern California

Classical biological control

East Malling Rootstock Club. Felicidad Fernández AHDB Tree Fruit Day 22 Feb 2018

Your Florida Dooryard Citrus Guide - Introduction 1

Figs and Citrus for Texas Gardens

Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 118: WILLIAM S. CASTLE 1 * AND MACE G. BAUER 2 1

Arnold Schumann, Kevin Hostler, Laura Waldo, Wije Bandaranayake (UF/IFAS, CREC) 2015 Fluid Forum February 17, 2015 Scottsdale, AZ

Cling Peach ANNUAL REPORT 2006 EVALUATION OF ROOTSTOCKS FOR TOLERANCE TO BACTERIAL CANKER AND ORCHARD REPLANT CONDITIONS.

DEVELOPMENT OF TETRAZYG ROOTSTOCKS TOLERANT OF THE DIAPREPES/PHYTOPHTHORA COMPLEX UNDER GREENHOUSE CONDITIONS

Citrus Notes IMPORTANT DATES CONTACT INFO. Chris Oswalt UF/IFAS Citrus Extension Agent for Polk & Hillsborough Counties

Nursery Site Selection and Citrus Tree Production 1

The influence of different cherry rootstocks on sweet cherry properties

Introduction. Objectives of training and pruning

Grafting of Tomatoes for Soil-based Production in Greenhouse and High Tunnels Judson Reid, Kathryn Klotzbach and Nelson Hoover

EXOCORTIS VIRUS AS A POSSIBLE FACTOR

EVALUATION OF THE EFFECT OF AMELANCHIER SP. AND QUINCE ELINE AS ROOTSTOCKS ON 1- TO 2-YEAR-OLD EUROPEAN PEAR TREES

2009 NC-140 Peach Rootstock Trial in Massachusetts

Apple Rootstocks. John Cline, University of Guelph, Horticultural Experiment Station, Simcoe

Screening and Evaluation of New Rootstocks with Resistance to Phytophthora cinnamomi

Requirements for successful organic citrus production

Growing Lavender in Colorado

Growing Citrus in the Dooryard 1

THE BELIZE CITRUS CERTIFICATION PROGRAMME (BCCP) GUIDELINES. 1. Introduction:

GROWTH AND PERFORMANCE OF OWN-ROOTED CHANDLER AND VINA COMPARED TO PARADOX ROOTED TREES

Update on new cherry rootstock possibilities from Michigan State Univ. Amy Iezzoni Department of Horticulture Michigan State University

Rootstock breeding and trialling at EMR. Feli Fernández

Arnold Schumann, Kevin Hostler, Laura Waldo (UF/IFAS, CREC) 2013 Fluid Forum February 18-19, 2013 Scottsdale, AZ

Tim Smith; Dana Faubion and Dr. William Proebsting,

Hawaii Agriculture Research Center -1- Vegetable Report 2. Hawaii Agriculture Research Center Vegetable Report 2 January 2000

Evaluation of grafting for the mature green tomato production system

Arapaho Citrus Management, Inc.

East Malling Rootstock Club Policy Group meeting 15th September 2017

KSU Blackberry Trial Update. Jeremy Lowe and Kirk W. Pomper Kentucky State University

Grower Summary TF 172. Evaluation and development of new rootstocks for apples, pears, cherries and plums. Final 2012

(35) PROHEXADIONE CALCIUM (APOGEE ) REDUCES GROWTH OF CONTAINER GROWN CITRUS ROOTSTOCK SEEDLINGS

Grafting and Rootstock Effects on Fruit Yield and Composition in Organic, Field-grown Tomato

Evaluation of citrus rootstocks for the high ph, calcareous soils of South Texas

UPDATE ON CHERRY ROOTSTOCKS

Tree Fruit Horticural Research at Hudson Valley Research Laboratory

Innovative Rootstocks for Apple crop. Nicola Dallabetta FEM (Italy) Australia November 2017

Yield and fruit quality of Queen orange [Citrus sinensis (L) Osb.] grafted on different rootstocks in Iran

Arnold Schumann(UF/IFAS, CREC) Soil Testing for Crop Nutrient Recommendations and Management November 13, 2014 GCREC, FL

Funded Projects to Aid Growers in the HLB Battle

2017 Sweet Potato Slip Production Research Update

Massachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station

Citrus Root Diseases. Citrus Pathology Fall Evan Johnson Plant Pathologist UF-IFAS-CREC

Pumpkin Cultivar Performance Trial Grown in Southern Ohio 2018

(12) United States Plant Patent

Developing and Optimizing Sweet Cherry Training Systems for Efficiency and High Quality Fruit Part 1. Gregory Lang Michigan State University

Evaluation of Potential New, Size Controlling Rootstocks for European Pears. Rachel Elkins, U.C. Cooperative Extension, Lake and Mendocino Counties

EVALUATION RESULTS OF FINNISH APPLE ROOTSTOCKS IN LATVIA

WALNUTRESEARCHRESULTSFOR1986 STUDYOF WALNUTREPLANTPROBLEMANDEFFICACIOUS METHODSOF CONTROL

Seminars at the Hendry County Extension Office, LaBelle

Managing Sa naging linity in Florida Citrus Brian Boman

Some Practical Matters Related to Riviera Soil, Depth to Clay, Water Table, Soil Organic Matter, and Swingle Citrumelo Root Systems 1

Effect of Rootstocks on Growth and Yield of Carmen Sweet Cherry

Vegetable Report 1 from Experiment Station, HARC December 1998

July-August 2007 Volume 13 / NO. 7. Walnut Rootstock Clones. page 4. PACIFIC NUT PRODUCER / July-August 2007

EVALUATION OF ROOTSTOCKS FOR PISTACHIO PRODUCTION

ANNUAL REPORT TO NC DWARF APPLE ROOTSTOCK TRIAL SUMMARY FOR THE 2010 SEASON

Developing new varieties

Evaluation of Grafted and Non-Grafted Hybrid and Heirloom Tomatoes in a High Tunnel

Plant Pathology Fact Sheet

Effect of Soil Amendment with Dry and Wet Distillers Grains on Growth of Canola and Soil Properties

EVALUATION OF NEW USDA ADVANCED FIRE BLIGHT-RESISTANT PEAR SELECTIONS

By some estimates, up to 40 percent of all citrus trees in

Sweet Cherry Rootstock Traits Lynn E. Long, Oregon State University

Comparison of Rootstocks Geneva 16, M9 and CG11 under organic cultivation at the LVWO Weinsberg B. Pfeiffer 1

EFFECT OF TREE SPACING ON FRUIT PRODUCTION AND NET RETURNS OF 'PINEAPPLE1 ORANGES

Selection of Clonal Avocado Rootstocks in Israel for High Productivity under Different Soil Conditions

Corn Rootworm Control in Field Corn with planting time treatments. Soil Insecticide Test # 3, 2005

AN INDOOR, CONTAINER SYSTEM FOR PRODUCING CITRUS NURSERY TREES IN ONE YEAR FROM SEED1

Spring Citrus Meeting Thursday, April 17, :30 to 11:15 A.M.

OPTIMIZING ORANGE GROVE FACTORS FOR FRUIT PRODUCTION AND HARVESTING

Peach Rootstock Trials Jim Schupp PSU-FREC

COMPARISON OF YIELDS BY TREE AGE AND ROOTSTOCK IN SOUTHWEST FLORIDA ORANGE GROVES

High Tunnel Pepper Variety Trial, 2011

FIELD TRIALS FOR RESISTANCE TO PHYTOPHTHORA ROOT ROT

CITRUS ROOT GROWTH IN SOILS SUBJECT

Transcription:

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Agricultural Research Service Washington, DC NOTICE TO FRUIT GROWERS AND NURSERYMEN RELATIVE TO THE NAMING AND RELEASE OF THE US-942 CITRUS ROOTSTOCK The Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture hereby releases to nurserymen and growers the US-942 citrus rootstock. This rootstock selection originated from a cross of Sunki mandarin (Citrus reticulata) x Flying Dragon Trifoliate Orange (Poncirus trifoliata) made by Dr. Herb Barrett (deceased) of the USDA, ARS, USHRL, Florida. Field testing ofus-942 was planned and conducted by Ors. Don Hutchison, Heinz Wutscher, Greg McCollum, and Kim Bowman (all of USDA, ARS, USHRL, Florida) in collaboration with or with support from industry partners, including Florida Citrus Research Foundation, Florida Citrus Production Research Advisory Council, Bentley Brothers Citrus, and Mid-Florida Citrus Foundation. During field testing, this hybrid rootstock was identified by code numbers HRS-942 or US-942. The major positive attributes of this new rootstock are ease of seed propagation, resistance or tolerance to citrus tristeza virus, citrus blight, and Phytophthora root diseases, as well as a semi-dwarfing effect on scion tree size, induction of good fruit quality, and induction of good fruit productivity per tree and per canopy volume. US-942 rootstock has been field tested at several locations and with several different scions. Tree survival in all trials was outstanding for US-942 rootstock. The longest field test involving this rootstock is a replicated cooperative trial in Polk County (Florida). In this trial with cooperator Bentley Brothers Citrus, 24 'Valencia' sweet orange trees on US-942 were compared with a similar number of trees on 20 other rootstocks planted in 1991. Fruit production of 'Valencia' on US-942 was measured through the first four harvest seasons and both fruit and soluble solids production was found to be outstanding on a per tree basis (Table 1 ). Fruit quality for trees on US-942 in this trial was excellent, with total soluble solids (TSS) for the first four harvest seasons the highest of any rootstock in the trial (Table 2). Fruit quality for trees on US-942 in this trial remained excellent for the next five harvest seasons (Table 3). US-942 rootstock was among the best rootstocks in fruit productivity and fruit quality in a 'Valencia' trial severely affected by Huanglongbing disease in St. Lucie County (Tables 4 and 5). It should be noted that none of the rootstocks in the trial continued to produce good fruit yields after the trees became affected by Huanglongbing. In trials ofus-942 with 'Hamlin' sweet orange in two different locations, fruit yield over 5 years and 8 years, respectively were outstanding in comparison with other common rootstocks (Tables 6 and 8). In these 'Hamlin' trials, fruit quality was intermediate, generally having similar TSS values to the common rootstocks Carrizo and Swingle (Tables 7 and 9). In most trials, trees on US-942 were slightly smaller than standard size trees on Carrizo rootstock. Trees of'hamlin' in Lake County and 'Valencia' in Polk County on US-942 rootstock at 12 and 9 years old, respectively, were 3.1 m tall (Table 10). Because of its induction of large yields on slightly smaller trees, yield efficiency of trees on US-942 was outstanding in both the 'Hamlin' and 'Valencia' trial. P.0070.10 Page 1 of2

Two trials ofus-942 in Lake County indicated good performance of this rootstock with mandarin scions. In a trial with 'Fallglo', trees on US-942 were similar in productivity to trees on Swingle and only exceeded in productivity by trees on Carrizo and US-812 (Table 11). In a trial with 'Sunburst', trees on US-942 were similar in productivity to trees on Cleopatra and Swingle, and only exceeded in productivity by trees on Carrizo and US-812 (Table 12). In both trials, soluble solids concentration of fruit on US-942 was similar to or better than trees on Carrizo and Swingle rootstocks. Fruit quality of' Sunburst' on US-942 in a second trial was also good and similar to that from trees on Swingle and Carrizo rootstocks (Table 13). US-942 produces apomictic seed by nucellar polyembryony and is thus very easy to propagate uniformly by seed. Nursery studies have indicated that US-942 produces vigorous and true to type seedlings at a frequency similar to or better than that of most other commercial rootstocks (Table 14). US-942 has not been tested for response to viroid diseases, but is expected to be sensitive to exocortis infection and only scion sources free ofviroid diseases should be used for propagations with this rootstock. Source plant material for US-942 has been tested and found free ofctv. Source plant material for US-942 will be distributed by the Florida Bureau of Citrus Budwood Registration, 3027 Lake Alfred Road (Highway 17), Winter Haven, Florida 33881. Limited quantities of US-942 seed will be distributed by the Citrus Nursery Division of the Florida Nursery, Growers and Landscape Association (FNGLA; phone 800-375-3642). Small quantities ofus-942 plant material for professional research and additional information may be obtained from Kim D. Bowman, USDA, ARS, USHRL, 2001 South Rock Road, Ft. Pierce, Florida 34945 (kim.bowman@ars.usda.gov). Genetic material of this release will be deposited in the National Plant Germplasm System where it will be available for research purposes, including development and commercialization of new cultivars. Appropriate recognition should be made if this germplasm contributes to the development of a new breeding line or cultivar. Signature:.,. "'. Deputy Admi strator, Crop Production and Protection ~ ) Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Date P.0070.10 Page 2 of2

Table 1. Fruit (kg) and Soluble Solids (kg) yield per tree of young 'Valencia' sweet orange on US-942 and selected rootstocks in Cooperative trial with Bentley Bros. in Polk County. Twenty-four trees on each rootstock were planted in 1991 on Candler fine sand. Cumulative Cumulative,' '' kg fruit kg fruit kgfruit. ", lf.gfruit kgfr:uit... kg SS R(}()tstock -- ---C_._1??~ -- 1996 1997 1998_c c(19?s:? L -~jj,995-98) US-912 40 be 64 a 89 b 113 a 306 a 17.7 a US-942 44 ab 64 a 83 be 99 ab 291 a Vangasay lemon 54 a 51 b 119 a 92 ab 317 a Swingle 38 be 39 be 75 be 87 b 240 b Carrizo 25 cd 29 c 75 be 86 b 216 be Sun Chu Sha 29 c 28 c 66 c 60 c 184 cd Gou Tou 13 de 15 d 73 be 64 c 165 d Sour orange 7e 3 e 20 d 22 d 52 e Mean separations for significant ANOV A within colmnns were by Duncan's multiple 17.5 a 15.6 ab 13.7bc 11.9 cd 10.8 de 8.5 e 2.9 f Table 2. Fruit quality of young 'Valencia' sweet orange on US-942 and selected rootstocks in cooperative trial with Bentley Bros in Polk County. Values are means of four harvests, 1995-98. Acid tssjitciil Rootstock TSS (% c.itric_i R~tib ~,,.._;,, US-912 10.5 0.78 13.5 US-942 10.8 0.78 13.9 Vangasay lemon 9.4 0.71 13.3 Swingle 10.5 0.77 13.6 Carrizo 10.2 0.74 13.8 Sun Chu Sha 10.6 0.77 14.0 Gou Tou 9.5 0.70 13.5 Sour orange 10.6 0.75 14.2 Values are means without statistical comparisons.

Table 3. Fruit quality of mature 'Valencia' sweet orange on US-942 and selected rootstocks in cooperative trial with Bentley Bros in Polk County. Values are means of five harvests, 1999-2003. Acid TSS!Ai:ld..fijice C<ilor Rootstock (% citric/ Ratio TSS So/box (CN/ ---~~------~- - ~ --~-----~- -_;_,, c. - -- ;_ ----- US-812 0.688 16.2 10.8abc 2.6ab 38.8a US-942 0.692 16.5 11.0ab 2.6ab 38.9a Vangasay lemon 0.677 15.6 10.lcd 2.3cd 39.0a Swingle 0.689 15.8 10.5abcd 2.5abc 39.0a Carrizo 0.647 16.2 10.lcd 2.3bcd 39.0a Sun Chu Sha 0.682 15.9 10.3bcd 2.4abcd 39.la Gou Tou 0.639 15.7 9.8d 2.2d 38.8a Sour orange 0.613 19.5 11. la 2.6a 38.2b Mean separations for significant ANOV A within columns were by Duncan's multiple Table 4. Fruit yield (kg/tree) of 'Valencia' sweet orange on US-942 and selected rootstocks in trial at Ft. Pierce in St. Lucie Cow1ty. Ten trees on each rootstock were planted in 1999..'z-.<\: ".<><: '.<:.... 9umuiatiy e... Rootstock 200.6 ~~'.::.>' 20()7 20.08 2009.... (70063JJ ~.-.:;; US-802 Oc 42 ab 63 a 31 137 a Rough lemon Oc 53 a 63 a 19 135 a US-942 16 a 49 ab 42 a-c 19 127 a Carrizo 2c 44 ab 51 ab 21 117 a Sour Orange Oc 35 a-c 44 a-c 28 107 a US-812 9 a-c 34 a-c 31 be 30 104 a US-897 13 ab 38 a-c 32 be 16 99 a Sun Chu Sha 1 c 36 a-c 35 a-c 20 93 ab Swingle 4 be 27 be 29 be 25 85 ab Flying Dragon 1 c 5d 16 c 18 40 b Mean separations for significm1t ANOV A within columns were by Duncan's multiple

Table 5. Fruit quality of 'Valencia' sweet orange on US-942 and selected rootstocks in trial at Ft. Pierce in St. Lucie County...,'~i~ >..Acid TSS7Acitf'' Rootstock (%citric).ratio --- US-802 11.8 cd 0.864 d-f 14.1 be Rough lemon 11.4 d 0.852 f 13.8 b-d US-942 12.8 ab 0.943 be 14.1 be Carrizo 12.7 ab 0.926 c 14.3 be Sour Orange 12.8 ab 0.910 c-e 14.5 b US-812 13.2 a 1.047 a 13.1 d US-897 12.3 be 0.922 c 13.6 cd Sun Chu Sha 12.8 ab 0.918cd 14.2 be Swingle 12.9 a 0.981 b 13.6 cd Flying Dragon 12.8 ab 0.870 ef 15.6 a Mean separations for significant ANOV A within columns were by Duncan's multiple Table 6. Fruit yield (kg/tree) of 'Hamlin' sweet orange on US-942 and selected rootstocks in cooperative trial with Mid-Florida Citrus Foundation in Lake County. Twelve trees on each rootstock were planted in 2002. '' < ' ' :,:'.<..'/,' "' \': <..'.'. "'<f::;.y. Ro.otstock ioos+6 2007+8 2009 Cumulative 2005~9 US-942 65 a 172 a 140 a 378 a US-812 55 ab 161 ab 127 ab 343 ab Carrizo 57 ab 142 be 123 ab 323 be US-952 52 ab 112 c 113 a-c 278 cd Swingle 45 be 120 c 82 c 247 d US-1277 35 c 72 d 83 c 190 e Mean separations for significant ANOV A within columns were by Duncan's multiple

Table 7. Fruit quality of 'Hamlin' sweet orange on US-942 and selected rootstocks in cooperative trial with Mid-Florida Citrus Foundation in Lake County. Rootstock Acid TSS/Acid. Juice color TSS... (%citric1 Ratio [CJYl US-942 8.6 d 0.678 c 12.8 be 35.6 US-812 8.8 cd 0.718 be 12.3 c 35.4 Carrizo 8.9 c 0.681 c 13.2 ab 35.6 US-952 9.5 a 0.699 be 13.8 a 35.6 Swingle 8.8 cd 0.795 a 11.5 d 35.4 US-1277 9.2 a 0.732 a 12.7 be 35.6 Mean separations for significant ANOVA within columns were by Duncan's multiple Table 8. Fruit yield (kg/tree) of 'Hamlin' sweet orange on US-942 and selected rootstocks in trial at the Whitmore Farm in Lake County. Four trees on each rootstock were planted in 1997. Soil is Astatula fine sand, ph 6.2. Cumulative Rootstock 2001+2 2003+.4 20.05+6 20071'8 l200l-i8/ US-942 165 a 243 a 286 a 248 a-c 942 a US-801 137 a-c 222 ab 238 ab 276 a 873 ab Carrizo 105 b-d 233 a 243 ab 266 ab 847 a-c US-802 IOI b-d 202 a-c 235 ab 276 a 814 a-c US-812 140 a-c 143 b-d 212 ab 222 a-d 717 b-e US-852 102 b-d 187 a-c 222 ab 176 c-e 688 b-e Swingle 92 cd 140 b-d 187 b 205 a-d 624 c-e US-897 124 a-d 135 cd 164 b 181 a-e 605 de US-809 69 de 133 cd 169 b 151 de 521 e Flying Dragon 38 e 95 d 87 c 105 e 325 f Mean separations for significant ANOVA within columns were by Duncan's multiple

Table 9. Fruit quality of 'Hamlin' sweet orange on US-942 and selected rootstocks in trial at the Whitmore Farm in Lake Com1ty. Rootstock TSS Acid ]'SSIA,Cid Juice c(jior (% citricl. RatiO... fclv1.--- --~-- ----~-"--------- --: -- US-942 10.3 b 0.817 a 12.9 d 34.6 be US-801 10.2 b 0.761 be 13.7 be 34.9 ab Carrizo 10.2 b 0.783 ab 13.5 be 34.5 c US-802 10.1 b 0.759 be 13.7 be 34.4 c US-812 10.6 a 0.806 a 13.5 be 34.4 c US-852 10.1 b 0.755 be 13.7 be 35.0 a Swingle 10.2 b 0.787 ab 13.2 cd 34.7 a-c US-897 10.7 a 0.787 ab 13.9 b 34.7 a-c US-809 10.3 b 0.753 be 13.9 b 34.5 c Flying Dragon 10.5 a 0.731 c 14.7 a 34.9 ab Mean separations for significant ANOVA within colmnns were by Duncan's multiple Table 10. Tree height (m), canopy volmne (m3) and yield efficiency (kg fruit/m3/yr) in Hamlin trial in Lake County and Valencia trial in Polk County, after harvest seasons 3-8 and 3-6, respectively. Hlitnliuctrialin Lakl!C:oilntJ!. Valencia lriafin Polk Countr. Tree Cal!Q_PY. Yield.Tree Ciin~pf.. Yield Rootstock keig./tl volume e[ficiencr. height volume 'e{fjdiency_ Sour orange nd nd nd 1.8 d 1.6 d 16.8 a US-942 3.1 b 9.5 a-c 13.5 a 3.1 c 7.5 c 13.9 a Flying Dragon 2.2 c 3.9 d 12.4 ab nd nd nd US-897 2.9 b 7.3 c 11.3 ab nd nd nd Swingle 3.1 b 8.6 be 10.5 ab 3.2 c 8.4 c 10.6 b US-812 3.1 b 9.3 a-c 10.7 ab 3.5 b 11.1 b 10.5 b Gou Tou nd nd nd 3.2 c 8.5 c 9.2 be Carrizo 3.4 a 10.7 ab 11.4 ab 3.5 b 11.2 b 8.3 be Sun Chu Sha nd nd nd 3.6 b 11.3 b 6.8 c Vangasay nd nd nd 3.9 a 14.4 a 6.7 c US-802 3.2 ab 11.8 a 10.1 b nd nd nd Mean separations for significant ANOV A within colurm1s were by Duncan's multiple

Table 11. Fruit yield (kg/tree) and soluble solids(%) of 'Fallglo' in trial at the Whitmore Farm in Lake County. 5-13 trees on each rootstock were planted in 1992. Soil is Astatula fine sand, ph 6.2. TSS is average of values on 10/24/00 and 11/5/01. ~- ''""' ~~ ~'-- ~-~--- ~ ~-o--- - ~~ Root~t~ck TSS ' 2000 -~ US-812 11.3 109 Carrizo 10.8 92 Swingle 10.4 69 US-942 10.9 29 Cleopatra 10.3 69 US-827 10.7 71 Sun Chu Sha 10.0 49 US-937 11.2 38 US-953 11.0 26 Values are means without statistical comparisons. >kooi_ 140 142 133 94 102 97 87 62 25 1995~2001 628 522 476 453 410 393 290 224 166 Table 12. Fruit yield (kg/tree) and soluble solids(%) of 'Sunburst' in a trial planted in 1992 at the Whitmore Farm in Lake County. 5-13 trees on each rootstock. Soil is Astatula fine sand, ph 6.2. TSS is average of values on 12/4/00 and 12/3/01..,~~,_;.,, _;._. Jfgfr:q~tper tree R.oot$(o<:k TSS 2000...,...... 'iiiiiai 1995-2001 -.- Carrizo 11.3 45 148 470 US-812 11.7 42 158 428 US-942 11.8 46 119 381 Cleopatra 11.4 48 102 375 Swingle 11.7 44 101 324 US-827 11.8 58 84 293 US-953 11.7 14 84 283 Sun Chu Sha 11.5 24 90 277 US-937 11.8 18 55 161 Values are means without statistical comparisons.

Table 13. Fruit quality of' Sunburst' on US-942 in a trial planted in 1997 at the Whitmore Farm in Lake County. Values are means of harvest in 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, and 2005. Acid TSS!Acid..Juice Color Rootstock TSS JJf citr_ic i Ratio (QY.L US-897 11.0 0.945 9.2 43.2 a US-942 10.7 0.896 9.4 42.9 ab US-812 10.9 0.896 9.4 42.8 b Carrizo 10.7 0.892 9.3 42.7 b Swingle 10.7 0.876 JO.I 42.7 b US-802 11.0 0.926 9.5 42.7 b Flying Dragon 10.5 0.928 11.6 42.1 c Mean separations for significant ANOVA within columns were by Duncan's multiple Table 14. Nursery performance ofus-942: Seedling vigor and trueness to type. 'Usable seedlings' is calculated as percent strong seedlings x percent true to type among strong. Rootstock. i> ';ii> t~~~g seii1liillgs(%) 'Iru~(~~"'PJl~~i,.., am(}n_gst~o_ngf%/. ; Q!!~Mi!... seedlings6%):' US-942 78 a 100 a 78 US-897 76 a 100 a 76 US-802 76 a 90 be 68 Cleopatra 66 be 100 a 66 Swingle 65 be 97 ab 63 Volkamer 58 c 97 ab 56 Kinkoji 63 be 86 c 54 Smooth Flat Seville 67 b 37 d 25 Mean separations for significant ANOVA within columns were by Duncan's multiple