continues in the watershed, additional flood control and water quality / natural system improvements may be required in the future.

Similar documents
USF System Campus Master Plan Updates Goals, Objectives and Policies

City of Dade City AMEC Project No Dade City Stormwater Master Plan September 2012 Page 32

MANUAL OF DESIGN, INSTALLATION, AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLANS

POLE BRIDGE ROAD NEAR FIVE LOT FARM

South Bismarck Watershed Model Update and Stormwater Improvement Project

City of Waco Stormwater Management Regulations

Leduc Industrial Outline Plan SE W4

CHECKLIST FOR PHASE II DRAINAGE REPORT

When planning stormwater management facilities, the following principles shall be applied where possible.

Three Rivers Park District Administration Center Rain Garden

Lincoln 270. City of Lincoln. Stormwater Management Plan. April 2, 2013

Stormwater Retrofitting: The Art of Opportunity. Presented by the Center for Watershed Protection

Figure 1 Cypress Street Study Area Location Map

STAFFORD TRACT NORTH OF US90A 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 OBJECTIVE

Village of Forest Park. July 27, Sewer Separation Evaluation

PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT LATHAM 200 MMSCFD GAS PROCESSING PLANT

BRISBANE BAYLANDS INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN FEBRUARY 2011 APPENDIX O DRAFT

CITY OF VALPARAISO STORMWATER MASTER PLAN

Storm Water Quality and Shoreline Restoration Improvements - Grant Funding Request City of Mound Carlson Park Bolton & Menk Project No.

4. Contractor (and subcontractors if applicable) certification statement(s)

DESIGN CRITERIA PACKAGE

Problem Understanding

Draft Rhode Island Stormwater Design and Installation Standards Manual

CHAPTER 4. SPECIAL CONDITION EROSION CONTROL MEASURES

DCBP APPENDIX B Action Plan for Retrofitting Structural BMPs

Old Mill Community Association Bioretention Facility

Evaluating Urban Stormwater Retrofits in the SE US Coastal Plain

Brigitte A. Berger, Director of Engineering

Project Descriptions for FY 15

Article 20 Stormwater Management

4. UTILITIES ELEMENT.

LID CASE STUDY DESIGN WORKSHOP HSG B/D SOIL EXAMPLE SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIVISION WITH OUTPARCEL

LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY COMPREHENSIVE & STRATEGIC CAMPUS MASTER PLAN. APPENDIX G - Stormwater Study Findings & Stormwater Solutions

NAPA COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS Standards & Specifications

Appendix A Basin Inventory Summary

Chapter 3 MAJOR CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS

Drexel, Barrell & Co.

Florida Stormwater Association 2015 Annual Conference June 17 19, 2015

Pollutant Removal Benefits

CITY OF TUMWATER 555 ISRAEL RD. SW, TUMWATER, WA (360) (360) (FAX)

PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK CITY OF TOWN AND COUNTRY STORMWATER PROGRAM

Why a new Food & Farm Ordinance?

30% Design Technical Report

City of Elmhurst. Comprehensive Flood Plan. City of Elmhurst. City Council Meeting September 15, 2014

6.5 Lakewood Gulch. Basin Snapshot

Severn River Sub-Watershed: BMP 09-Retrofit

OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE MANUAL FOR POST CONSTRUCTION MEASURES

Stormwater Master Plan Update. City Council Briefing January 8, 2019

The Art and Science of Stormwater Retrofitting

Swan Creek Urban BMP Inventory and Assessment. Jeff Grabarkiewicz, Kari Gerwin, Ann-Drea Hensley TMACOG, Lucas SWCD/Engineers, and Partners

Post Construction BMPs

VA DCR STORMWATER DESIGN SPECIFICATION NO. 11 WET SWALE. VERSION 2.0 January 1, 2013 SECTION 1: DESCRIPTION

Constructed Stormwater Wetlands

Washington County, Maryland Division of Public Works Policy Manual

Review Zone Application for D&R Canal Commission Decision

RFP DRAINAGE OUTFALL DESIGN AND PERMITTING. Mandatory Meeting for Proposers August 15, 2015

Stormwater Management at The University of New Orleans

Drexel, Barrell & Co.

Huntington Stormwater Utility

Stormwater Regulations & Considerations Morse Study Area. Pam Fortun, P.E. CFM Senior Stormwater Treatment Engineer Engineering Services Division

Pasco County Watershed Meeting for Flood Impacted Areas Port Richey Watershed

STORMWATER REPORT FOR WALMART SUPERCENTER STORE # SIOUX FALLS, LINCOLN COUNTY, SOUTH DAKOTA BFA PROJECT NO

APPENDIX C: STORMWATER CONTROL PLAN

3/7/2013. Compliance & Sustainability

Design Considerations for Open Channel and Detention Pond Design. Howard Redfearn, City of Mansfield

October 7, City of Thornton 9500 Civic Center Drive Thornton, CO (303) RE: Maverik Thornton, CO - Drainage Report

Best Management Practices

5. LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS

A. Regional Detention Requirements

PCE PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE ANALYSIS REPORT FOR WESTWOOD MIXED USE NEIGHBORHOOD PROJECT 772 NORTH FOREST ROAD TOWN OF AMHERST, ERIE COUNTY, NEW YORK

SOUTH FOX MEADOW STORMWATER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

MASTER DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE PLAN FOR MONUMENT HEIGHTS

East Montpelier SWMP Preliminary BMP Summary Sheet BMP ID #: 1 Site name: U-32 High School. Current site type

Pond Siting Report Update

Mitchell Ranch South MPUD Application for Master Planned Unit Development Approval Project Narrative. Introduction

Green Infrastructure Modeling in Cincinnati Ohio. Small Scale Green Infrastructure Design Using Computer Modeling

Patrick E. Lindemann INGHAM COUNTY DRAIN COMMISSIONER. Towar Rain Garden Drains A Low-Impact Urban Retrofit

C ity of Grande Prairie Development Services Department

Action Plan for Retrofitting Structural BMPs

The use of low head weirs to. perennial streams with their floodplains:

A G E N D A Council Update Training Room September 26, :45 p.m.

Hopwood Motorway Service Area, Worcestershire

New Development Stormwater Guidelines

Jill Stachura STORMWATER BMP AND STREAM RESTORATION IN A CITY PARK. October 2013 Southeast Stormwater Association Annual Conference, Charlotte, NC

Operation & Maintenance of Stormwater Management Facilities


Alan Wertepny MS4 Coordinator September 15, 2011

Impervious Cover Reduction Action Plan for City of Vineland, Cumberland County, New Jersey

WET PONDS INSPECTION & MAINTENANCE CHECKLIST

AWR Engineering, LLC

Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems. Diederik Rousseau Tineke Hooijmans

GREEN ON THE HORIZON. Challenges of Integrating LID into New Development. Southeast Stormwater Association

Appendix K. Stormwater Management Plan

Stormwater Outfall Inventory and Mapping City and Borough of Juneau

Low Impact Development (LID) Techniques. Associate BD Presentation, October 7, 2014

Table of Contents G.1.a Water Resources - Surface Water - Drainage

The Engineer/Developer s Perspective on Storm Water Management

6.1. INTRODUCTION 6.2. EXISTING CONDITIONS

Storm Water Technology Fact Sheet Vegetated Swales

Low Impact Development. Charlene LeBleu Auburn University Landscape Architecture (334)

Transcription:

The Duck Pond Watershed is located in northern Hillsborough County in an area in which a number of land and water management issues are currently being addressed by citizen's action groups and state, regional and local government agencies. The URS Corporation Team was retained by Hillsborough County to prepare the Duck Pond Watershed Management Plan as a part of the County s overall watershed management program. The objectives of the plan were to describe the existing drainage, flooding, water quality, natural systems and water supply conditions within the watershed and to develop alternatives to improve areas not currently meeting the County s level of service. The Study area is identified as the Duck pond Watershed, but the study area includes portions of the Cypress Creek and Hillsborough River Watersheds. The total study area encompasses approximately 5,160 acres within the Cypress Creek and Hillsborough River Watersheds. Approximately 1,404 and 3,756 acres are within the Cypress Creek and Hillsborough River Watersheds, respectively. Flooding, water quality and natural systems were evaluated for approximately 4,343 acres (6.79 square miles) (see Figure 2-1). This 4,343 acres will be identified as the Duck Pond Watershed (DPW) for the remainder of this report. Approximately 4,203 acres of the 4,343 acres and an additional 817 acres south of Fowler Avenue within the City of Tampa was modeled using the County SWMM stormwater model. The areas not modeled include Sub-basin 620100 (approximately 35 acres) and Sub-basin 580509 (approximately 106 acres). Sub-basin 620100 is located on the USF golf course and was not modeled in the USF North drainage system because it consists of a marsh wetland isolated from the USF north drainage system. Sub-basin 580509 is located on the USF campus adjacent the intersection of Fowler Avenue and Bruce B. Downs Boulevard. Sub-basin 580509 was not modeled because it is not within the Duck Pond Watershed. Sub-basin 580509 discharges south through a circular culvert under Fowler Avenue. A break down of the areas within the study area is shown on Table 1.1 The project area is primarily urban, and drains into either Cypress Creek or the Hillsborough River. Several major roads, including Nebraska Avenue, Bruce B. Downs Blvd., 56 th Street, Fletcher Avenue, and Fowler Avenue travel through the project area. The basin is composed of 193 smaller units or sub-basins ranging in size from approximately 0.61 to 251.3 acres. Land elevations in the DPW vary between a high of about 75 feet NGVD in the southeast portion of the project area to a low of around 25 feet NGVD. Flooding in several areas of the watershed was reported during the El Ni? o rainfall events during late 1997 and early 1998. The DPW lies within the Polk Upland physiographic unit as defined by White. This unit is part of the Central or Mid-Peninsular physiographic zone, one of three in Florida. This zone is characterized by discontinuous highlands formed by sub-parallel ridges that are separated by broad valleys. The project area has six major drainage systems each with their own outfall. These include; Duck Pond, Bruce. B. Downs, USF North, USF East, USF Campus East and Raintree Systems. The Bruce B. Downs, USF North, USF East and USF Campus East outfall to Cypress Creek. The Raintree System discharges directly to the Hillsborough River. The Duck Pond System outfalls to a storm sewer system within the City of Tampa south of the University Square Mall. These systems in conjunction handle the majority of the stormwater conveyance within the project area. 1

There are some lakes, wetland areas and depressions located within the project area. Hydrologically, surface flows originate for the most part through stormwater runoff with some influence from groundwater flows from lake seepage. One purpose of the study was to develop a computer simulation model of the Duck Pond watershed under current conditions. Runoff parameters for the watershed were developed from land use, soils and topographic maps. Hydraulic input data for the County SWMM stormwater model was developed from survey data, topographic maps and permit data. The model was calibrated to historical storm events to ensure the accuracy of the model. The calibrated model was then used to calculate the location and degree of flooding within the watershed for the 2.33- year, 5-year, 10-year, 25-year, 50-year and 100-year design storm events. The model was then used to determine the level of service based on County criteria for the watershed. Pollutant loads for several selected pollutants (chemicals, parameters) were estimated using the Hillsborough County supplied spreadsheet model, the Pollutant loading and Removal Model (PLRM). Pollutants considered include 12 parameters: Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD), Total Suspend Solids (TSS), oil/grease, Total Nitrogen (TN), Nitrogen Oxides (NOx), Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN), Total Phosphorus (TP), Total Dissolved Phosphorus (TDP), Cadmium (Cd), Copper (Cu), Lead (Pb), and Zinc (Zn). The water quality level of service (LOS) was calculated by comparing the actual net load to the load for a low-density single family residential land use without treatment of the same areas. Five levels of LOS were considered (A, B, C, D, and F). Depending upon the difference in these loads, LOS designation ranging from A through F was determined for each sub-basin in the watershed. Upon completion of the existing conditions analysis, an analysis of alternatives to reduce flooding, water quality, and natural systems problems was performed. Many projects were recommended for the Duck Pond Watershed to address flood control, water quality, and natural system improvements. The construction or implementation of the these projects will be dependant on funding availability, right-of-way availability, permitting, and other related issues. Hillsborough County has taken a positive step forward in the implementation of the recommended projects by coordinating with SWFWMD and HCEPC and by allowing public input throughout the development of the watershed management plan. Hillsborough County has met with the Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD) to review the Duck Pond Watershed Management Plan. The SWFWMD indicated during this meeting consideration is given to requiring all new developments in the drainage systems draining to Duck Pond West and Duck Pond East (Nebraska Avenue System, 131 st Avenue System, Mall West/East System and Robbins Lumber System) to meet drainage criteria for closed basins. The SWFWMD has not made this official, however, Hillsborough County should inquire with the SWFWMD about this potential requirement prior to implementing any of the recommended preferred alternatives in the Duck Pond Watershed. Additional funding for project construction or implementation may be available from grants or joint agreements with SWFWMD, FDEP, EPA, and the City of Tampa. As development 2

continues in the watershed, additional flood control and water quality / natural system improvements may be required in the future. The listing of final recommended projects in the Duck Pond Watershed include: - Construct the preferred alternatives in the order shown on Table 19.1. - Construct Hillsborough County projects: CIP 49290, CIP 47006, 40025, 47036, 47320, 47288, 47291, 47290 and CIP 47008. Descriptions and locations of these CIP projects can be found on Table 13.2 and Figure 13-2, respectively. - Consider implementing modified versions of the eliminated Alternatives 12 and 17 at Duck Pond West and the 131 st Pond, respectively. The flood control aspect of these two alternatives could be eliminated by eliminating major excavation, storm sewer pipe and outfall structures. These two projects could become wetland enhancement projects, such as re-grading and re-planting the banks to create an enhanced littoral shelf. Remove invasive species located throughout Duck Pond Watershed in ditches and along right-of-ways (e.g. cogongrass along right-of-ways, skunkvine and air potato in ditches). Continue public education on the importance of controlling invasive species in yards. Cost will vary. - Utilize grassed swales or detention areas where feasible, for water quality treatment for proposed CIP projects. - Coordinate with the City of Tampa with regards to the following improvements the City may implement south of Fowler Avenue. Provide pumping capacity from the existing Donut Pond to 30 th Street. Install an additional 24-inch culvert under the railroad tracks. Install a new 5-acre detention pond north of 113 th Avenue at the current site of the Scruggs Manor apartment complex. These improvements by the City of Tampa will be necessary to implement Alternative14 (see table 19.1) because this alternative increases the discharge rate leaving the Duck Pond Watershed into the City of Tampa system. Remove debris and overgrown vegetation in the Outfall ditch extending from 15 th Street immediately south of 127 th Avenue to Duck Pond West. Remove nuisance plant species from 131 st and Nebraska Avenue ponds. Remove silt and dead vegetation from clogged pipes, manholes and inlets in the storm sewer at the intersection of 127 th Avenue and 15 th Street. 3

- Regularly conduct the following maintenance items: Mow canal banks and retention ponds on County-owned property and drainage easements Repair or install cross-drain and side-drain pipe culverts in County easement or right-of-way Cleaning and removal of debris and silt from drainage structures in County easement or right-of-way Dragline cleaning and reshaping of canals and drainage ditches in County easement or rightof-way Roadside ditch cleaning in County easement or right-of-way 4

Table 19.1 Priority Rank of The Preferred Alternatives Alternative No. Project Description Priority Ranking Preliminary Cost Estimate 1 Proposed storm sewer along 122 nd Avenue 1 $ 602,848 from the Hillsborough County Pond to Duck Pond West. 18 Expand existing Nebraska Avenue Pond 2 $ 250,163 adjacent the CSX RR 2 Proposed storm sewer along 12 th Street 3 $ 200,577 3 Proposed storm sewer along 14 th Street 4 $ 226,355 4 Proposed storm sewer along 15 th Street 5 $ 226,355 5 Proposed storm sewer along 17 th Street 6 $ 226,135 14 * Increase discharge rate from duck Pond 7 $93,811 East by modifying the existing outfall structure. 16 Expand existing conservation pond on 22 nd 8 $ 295,914 Street north of 127 th avenue 23 Proposed storm sewer along 22 nd Street 9 $667,596 from 127 th Avenue to 139 th Avenue 19 Proposed storm sewer along 20 th Street 10 $ 463,302 from 127 th Avenue to Fletcher 21 Proposed storm sewer along 20 th Street 11 $ 239,558 from 139 th Avenue to Fletcher Avenue. 22 Proposed storm sewer along 20 th Street 12 $ 203,674 from 139 th Avenue to 143 rd Avenue 6 Proposed storm sewer along 120 th Avenue 13 $ 139,125 from Nebraska Avenue to Hillsborough County Pond. 7 Proposed storm sewer along 131 st Avenue 14 $ 475,472 from 15 th Street to Nebraska Avenue 10 Proposed storm sewer along 124 th Avenue 15 $ 167,557 from CSX RR to Nebraska Avenue 8 Proposed storm sewer along 139 th Avenue 16 $110,790 from CSX RR to Nebraska Avenue 9 Proposed storm sewer along Taliaferro 17 $175,655 Avenue from 127 th Avenue to Nebraska Avenue 26 Wetland Enhancement at existing wetland 18 $144,780 east of 56 th Street in the Raintree North Drainage system 27 Wetland Enhancement at existing wetland 19 $144,780 south of Fletcher Avenue in the USF East Drainage System 25 Wetland Enhancement at existing wetland 20 $144,780 south of B.B. Downs Boulevard in the B.B. Downs Drainage System 24 Wetland Enhancement at existing wetland east of 46 th Street on the USF golf course. 21 $144,780 * Must be done in conjunction with the City of Tampa improvements downstream. 5