Proposal Level May 3, Members, State Board of Education. Kimberley Harrington Acting Commissioner N.J.A.C. 6A: REASON

Similar documents
1 of 1 DOCUMENT. NEW JERSEY REGISTER Copyright 2009 by the New Jersey Office of Administrative Law

Safety Standard for Automatic Residential Garage Door Operators. SUMMARY: The Consumer Product Safety Commission ( Commission or CPSC ) is

Airworthiness Directives; Kidde Aerospace Part Number (P/N) Hand-Held Halon Fire Extinguishers

[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2017-NE-02-AD; Amendment ; AD ]

[Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-176-AD] Airworthiness Directives; DASSAULT AVIATION Airplanes

National Fire Protection Association. 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA Phone: Fax:

TAC: Fire. Total Mods for Fire in Approved as Submitted: 1. Total Mods for report: Glitch. Fire. Page 2 of 8. 27/06/2013 Page 2 of 8

ONTARIO MUNICIPAL BOARD

Options for addressing City of Edmonds Alternatives to Ecology s Required Changes addressing Edmonds Marsh Buffers and Setbacks.

The North American Electric Reliability Corporation ( NERC ) hereby submits

SAFETY DRILLS Lincoln County School District

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

[Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2004-CE-25-AD; Amendment ; AD ]

Florida Senate SB 982 By Senator Bennett

40 TAC Tex. Admin. Code tit. 40, What safety precautions must I follow when children in my care use a swimming pool?

FIRE PREVENTION AND PROTECTION*

UNOFFICIAL COPY OF SENATE BILL 464 A BILL ENTITLED

Louisville Metro Ordinance (Chapter 94: Fire Prevention) FIRE HYDRANTS, WATER MAINS AND WATER SUPPLY.

SENATE, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 214th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED DECEMBER 9, 2010

Second Revision No. 104-NFPA [ Section No ] Submitter Information Verification. Committee Statement

City of Redlands East Valley Corridor Specific Plan. City Council

E-Waste Frequently Asked Questions August 1, 2017

FIRE & LIFE SAFTEY STANDARD

Public may provide comments on the GDP within the next two weeks (December 24)

TETON COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION RESOLUTION FOR NEW SUBDIVISIONS 2008 Edition. Chapter I General Provisions

LD 1159 (LR: 2015 item 01) Unofficial Document created :44:07

Background information

Test Procedure for Clothes Dryers and Room Air Conditioners. NOPR Public Meeting

CS for CS for SB 126 First Engrossed

Real World: LATCH, Tethers and the CPS Technician. October 2012

ALARM SYSTEMS AND EVACUATION PLANS SELF INSPECTION CHECKLIST

Sec False alarms.

NEW YORK CITY FIRE DEPARTMENT. Notice of Public Hearing and Opportunity to Comment on Proposed Rule

EA-430 USER MANUAL. Version

Vehicle Detection: How To Choose the Right Technology... 3

L'HOTELLIER

Click & Collect Alcohol Sales in Wisconsin

LexisNexis (TM) New Jersey Annotated Statutes

ALARM DEVICES FOR MAN OVER BOARD AND RESCUE ACTIONS (DAHMAS)

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of

Blind Spot Safety Solutions

Highway Oriented Commercial Development Criteria

Touchpad Exit Controller User Guide

Courthouse Square Implementation Comment/Response Matrix

DRAFT Subject to Modifications

National Fire Protection Association. 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA Phone: Fax:

Planned Development Review Revisions (Project No. PLNPCM )

ALARM SYSTEMS AND EVACUATION PLANS SELF INSPECTION CHECKLIST

EARLY FIRE DETECTION IN SWISS ROAD TUNNELS WITH MORE THAN FIREGUARD SENSORS

Update all extract references to NFPA documents (including NFPA 72) in Chapter 3 and related annex material to the latest editions.

Eye Alert System EA405, EA410, EA420 USER MANUAL

MEMORANDUM. Subject: NFPA 1124 Proposed Tentative Interim Amendment (TIA) No. 1094

VEOLIA ES TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, L.L.C. REGULATORY UPDATE June 2013

GRADE CROSSING SIGNAL SYSTEM SAFETY REGULATIONS

record.group User manual record FlipFlow Triple automatic door systems this is record! record your global partner for entrance solutions

Single Room Occupancy Hotel Safety & Stabilization Task Force

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 973

November 17, Sent Via Electronic and Regular Mail

IC Chapter Severe Weather Warning Sirens

Low Cost Vehicle Detection System to Help Green UCI Parking

ALARM SYSTEMS AND EVACUATION PLANS SELF INSPECTION CHECKLIST

ACTIVE INFRARED BARRIER

TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M. To: Council Members AGENDA ITEM 8B5

RESOLUTION NO. R Refining the route, profile and stations for the Downtown Redmond Link Extension

Proposed Amendments: N.J.A.C. 5: , 6.4, 6.5, 6.6, 6.7, 6.21A, 6.25A, 6.26A,

TO THE FOR PRESCRIPTIVE COMPLIANCE OF FOR RESIDENTIAL ALTERATIONS

GS-12 GREEN SEAL STANDARD FOR OCCUPANCY SENSORS FIRST EDITION FEBRUARY 14, 1997

UNOFFICIAL COPY OF HOUSE BILL 1406 A BILL ENTITLED

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION. [Docket No ; NRC ] Exemption Requests for Special Nuclear Material License SNM-362,

Standard PRC-005-3(i) Protection System and Automatic Reclosing Maintenance

UNOFFICIAL COPY OF HOUSE BILL 1202 EMERGENCY BILL 5lr2923

National Fire Protection Association. 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA Phone: Fax:

Report on First Revision June 2014 NFPA 5000

Proximity Detection & Collision Avoidance. Strata s solutions for surface, underground, and surface-to-underground

Radar technology in surveillance

BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THURSTON COUNTY

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

DISTRICT OF PORT HARDY BYLAW A BYLAW TO ESTABLISH AND REGULATE THE DISTRICT OF PORT HARDY FIRE DEPARTMENT

ARTICLE 4-13 ALARM SYSTEMS * Division 1. Generally

City of Manassas, Virginia Joint Facilities Use Committee Meeting AGENDA. Joint Facilities Use Committee

Standard PRC-005-X Protection System, Automatic Reclosing, and Sudden Pressure Relaying Maintenance

This regulation outlines procedures to be followed for fire drills and all school event decorations.

Standard PRC-005-3(X) Protection System and Automatic Reclosing Maintenance

Fire Sprinklers Working Group Final Report

Proposed Plan Change 55: District Wide Rules. Hearing Report

Steering Committee Meeting

F&S Control of Hazardous Energy Program

DENVER AMENDMENT PROPOSAL 2015 INTERNATIONAL CODES

Council of the City of York, PA Session 2008 Bill No. Ordinance No. INTRODUCED BY: Genevieve Ray DATE: November 18, 2008

UPDATE MEMORANDUM. PS COMMITTEE #1 November 30, November 28, TO: Public Safety Committee

Standard PRC Protection System, Automatic Reclosing, and Sudden Pressure Relaying Maintenance

NEC ROP/ROC Code Making Panel Meetings

IP68. Ultrasonic Sensors - Pro. Backscan - PRO Specifications

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2007 SESSION LAW SENATE BILL 1924

Changes for the New Edition. Senior Engineer, NFPA NFPA

This chapter shall be known as the "City of Bayfield Alarm Systems Ordinance."

Are You Prepared? The impending impact of Code on Servicing Security Systems

British Columbia Building Code 2006 Division B Part 3 Fire Protection, Occupant Safety and Accessibility Section 3.2 Building Fire Safety

Camden County Development Regulations. Updated February 2017

Receive recommendations from representatives of the Future Land Use Plan Advisory Committee regarding their review of the Land Use Element of the

Transcription:

Proposal Level May 3, 2017 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: REASON FOR ACTION: AUTHORITY: Members, State Board of Education Kimberley Harrington Acting Commissioner N.J.A.C. 6A:27-7.13 Notice of proposed substantive changes N.J.S.A. 39:3B-26 SUNSET DATE: February 18, 2021 The Department of Education (Department) proposed amendments to N.J.A.C. 6A:27 on October 17, 2016, at 48 N.J.R. 2091(a), to establish rules implementing Abigail s Law (P.L. 2015, c. 266; N.J.S.A. 39:3B-26). The proposed rules will effectuate the law, which requires school buses manufactured on or after July 17, 2016, to be equipped with a sensor to determine the presence of objects in the front or back of the bus. The 60-day public comment period closed December 16, 2016. Via a notice of proposed substantive changes, the Department is proposing a number of changes to the amendments and new rules in response to comments received. A summary of only the comments that prompted the changes and the agency responses are provided in the attached comment-response form, which will serve as the notice. If approved by the State Board for publication in the N.J. Register, only the new amendments being proposed in this notice will be subject to public comment for 60 days. After the 60-day comment period is over, the Department plans to present to the State Board the comments received regarding the notice of proposed substantive changes and the Department s responses. The comments and responses related to the notice will be presented to the State Board along with all comments received during the 60-day comment period on the initial proposal (48 N.J.R. 2091(a)), including comments not captured in the attached notice. The combined materials will be presented to the State Board at adoption level.

STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION ADMINISTRATIVE CODE COMMENT/RESPONSE FORM Topic: Student Transportation Meeting Date: May 3, 2017 Code Citation: N.J.A.C. 6A:27-7.13 Level: Proposal of Notice of Proposed Substantive Changes Division: Finance Completed by: Office of School Finance The Department of Education (Department) proposed amendments to N.J.A.C. 6A:27 on October 17, 2016, at 48 N.J.R. 2091, to establish rules implementing Abigail s Law (P.L. 2015, c. 266; N.J.S.A. 39-3B-26). The proposed rules will effectuate the law, which requires school buses manufactured on or after July 17, 2016, to be equipped with a sensor to determine the presence of objects in the front or back of the bus. The public comment period closed December 16, 2016. The Department is proposing a number of substantial changes to the amendments in response to comments received. A summary of only the comments that prompted the changes and the agency responses are provided below. Summary of Comments and Agency Responses The following is a summary of the comments received from the public and the Department s responses. Each commenter is identified at the end of the comment by a number that corresponds to the following list: 1. Pete Kallgren, Vice President of Sales and Marketing Rostra Precision Controls Inc. 2. Joe Labonte, Chairman School Bus Manufacturers Technical Council 1. COMMENT: The commenter stated the definition of sensor system proposed in N.J.A.C. 6A:27-7.13(a)2 should not be limited to a specific technology, and suggested that any system meeting the performance requirements should be permitted. (2) RESPONSE: The Departments agrees. The Department proposes in the definition for sensor system at N.J.A.C. 6A:27-7.13(a)2 to add technology such as, but not limited to after means a system utilizing. The proposed amendment will permit the use of additional technologies that meet the other criteria specified in the section. Please see the response to Comment 2 for the full rule text. 2. COMMENT: The commenter suggested proposed N.J.A.C. 6A:27-7.13(a)2 should define a minimum height and shape of the person(s) or object(s) the system must be designed to detect. The commenter recommended the criteria in the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) 111 (49 CFR Part 571.111) be used for the front sensor (a 12-inch high by 12- inch diameter cylinder), and the Final Rule for FMVSS 111 Rear Visibility be used for the rear sensor (a 32-inch high by 12-inch diameter cylinder). (1, 2)

RESPONSE: The Department agrees the dimensions need to be defined. The Department proposes a new rule at N.J.A.C. 6A:27-7.13(a)2i to require the system to be able to detect a person or object as measured by the placement of a 12-inch high by 12- inch diameter cylinder in the front and rear of the school bus. The proposed dimensions are based on the criteria found in FMVSS 111 (49 CFR Part 571.111) and would apply to both the front and rear sensor areas. The Department proposes adopting the criteria in this standard rather than the Final Rule for FMVSS 111 Rear Visibility because the Final Rule is extremely limited in its focus and application (i.e. it applies only to small vehicles and video-only sensors). The FMVSS 111 provides a more stringent standard than the one found in the Final Rule (requiring the detection of a 12-inch high cylinder, as opposed to a 32-inch high cylinder) and would be more consistent and universal in its application (i.e. more easily adapted for use on all sizes of school buses, as well as sensor systems using different types of technology). The proposed amendment at N.J.A.C. 6A:27-7.13(a)2 is: Sensor system means a system utilizing technology such as, but not limited to, radar, video, sound, or infrared technology [[to detect]] that shall be capable of detecting the presence of a person(s) or object(s) as measured by the placement of a 12-inch high by 12-inch diameter cylinder within a minimum [[of a 10-foot radius in the front and rear of the school bus.]] area defined as follows: 3. COMMENT: The commenter recommended the Department define in N.J.A.C. 6A:27-7.13(a)2 the specific detection area of the sensor system. (2) RESPONSE: The Departments agrees and proposes N.J.A.C. 6A:27-7.13(a)2i and ii to define the required detection area of the sensor system for vehicles with a GVWR of 10,000 pounds or less, and for vehicles with a GVWR over 10,000 pounds, respectively. i. For vehicles with a GVWR of 10,000 pounds or less, five feet laterally to each side and extending 10 feet frontward from the center of the vehicle s front bumper, and five feet laterally to each side and extending 10 feet rearward from the center of the vehicle s rear bumper; or ii. For vehicles with a GVWR over 10,000 pounds, 10 feet laterally to each side and extending 10 feet frontward from the center of the vehicle s front bumper, and 10 feet laterally to each side and

extending 10 feet rearward from the center of the vehicle s rear bumper. 4. COMMENT: The commenter requested clarification at N.J.A.C. 6A:27-7.13(a)2 to specify whether the sensor system must detect stationary or moving objects. (2) RESPONSE: The Department agrees that clarification is needed. The proposed amendments and new rules at N.J.A.C. 6A:27-7.13(a)2, shown above, include language that requires the sensor system to detect the presence of a person(s) or object(s) of a specific dimension within the specific area of detection. The inclusion of the presence of clarifies the system must detect any person or object meeting the criteria regardless of whether the person or object is stationary or moving. 5. COMMENT: The commenter stated the requirement at N.J.A.C. 6A:27-7.13(c) for an audible or visual alert to be used in addition to a video monitor system is unnecessary and suggested it be removed. The commenter cited the NHTSA research and conclusions in the Final Rule for FMVSS 111 Rear Visibility, which indicates that video-only systems without an audible alert consistently outperform sensor-only systems. (2) RESPONSE: The Department s original proposal would have required an audible alert to be used with a video monitor system to alert the driver s attention in case his or her attention is diverted from the screen. Based on NHTSA s research and conclusions summarized by the commenter, the Department proposes amendments at N.J.A.C. 6A:27-7.13(c) and (c)1 to remove the requirement for a video monitor system to include an audible alert. (c) The sensor system shall include an audible and visual alert signal placed in the driver s compartment to alert the driver when a person(s) or object(s) is detected within the sensor s designated [[range]] area or a video monitor [[with an audible alert]] placed in the driver s compartment relaying the image of the [[area within the]] sensor s designated [[range]] area. 1. The audible alert signal for the sensor shall be a sound [[unique to the system]] that is distinctive from all other audible alert signals on the bus. 2 The alert signal shall identify for the driver the location near the vehicle in which the person(s) or object(s) is detected, except when a video monitor is used.

6. COMMENT: The commenter requested clarification at N.J.A.C. 6A:27-7.13(d) regarding the sensor system s activation and deactivation protocols: specifically, when the rear detection system must be activated and deactivated in relation to the other vehicle safety systems and the front detection system. The commenter stated the requirement for the front system to be activated in conjunction with one of the other vehicle safety systems may not be adequate because there may be circumstances where the sensor system should be activated but not the other systems. Lastly, the commenter expressed concern that activation of both the front and rear systems at the same time may confuse the driver as to the location of the person(s) or object(s) in relation to the school bus. (2) RESPONSE: The Department agrees the sensor system s activation and deactivation protocols need to be clarified and that separate requirements for the front and back sensors are necessary. In response, the Department proposes amendments at N.J.A.C. 6A:27-7.13(d) to require the rear detection system to be activated only when the transmission is in the reverse gear and to be deactivated in any gear other than reverse. The Department also proposes new rules at N.J.A.C. 6A:27-7.13(e), (e)1 and 2, and (e)2i and ii to differentiate the requirements for the front sensor system. The Department proposes amendments to clarify the front sensor system must activate every time any passenger entrance door opens. The Department further proposes to add minimum requirements for the delay of the front sensor system s deactivation: whenever the set vehicle speed reaches a minimum of 10 miles per hour or a minimum time delay of 10 seconds. Because both the front and rear sensors will not be activated at the same time, there should be no confusion concerning the location of the person(s) or object(s) in relation to the bus. (d) The rear sensor system shall only and always activate with the engagement of reverse gear and [[also activate simultaneous with the activation of at least one of the vehicle safety systems set forth in N.J.A.C. 13:20-50B, including, but not limited to: warning lights or alarms, as specified in N.J.A.C. 13:20-50B.23(f) or 50B.3; crossing control arm, as specified in N.J.A.C. 13:20-50B.9; stop signal arm, as specified in N.J.A.C. 13:20-50B.38; or]] shall deactivate when the reverse gear is disengaged. (e) The front sensor system shall activate in any gear other than reverse gear every time any passenger entrance door opens. The front sensor system shall deactivate:

1. [[with]] With the [[disengagement]] engagement of reverse gear; [[or on a delay from the deactivation of one of the vehicle safety systems in this subsection based upon]] and 2. When in any gear other than reverse, after all passenger entrance doors are closed and: i. The vehicle has reached a speed of 10 miles per hour; or [[a set period of time]] ii. Ten seconds have elapsed after closure of the passenger door(s). 7. COMMENT: The commenter suggested N.J.A.C. 6A:27-7.13(d)1 prohibiting dualtechnology systems be removed. The commenter stated certain technologies (e.g. sensor fusion systems) that are more accurate and reliable than technologies operating with a single technology system may eventually be developed. (2) RESPONSE: The Department agrees, and proposes to delete the prohibition of dual technology systems at N.J.A.C. 6A:27-7.13(d)1. [[1. The sensor system shall not include a dual-technology system that requires the triggering of more than one technology before an alert is activated.]] Summary of Agency-Initiated Changes: 1. The Department proposes at N.J.A.C. 6A:27-7.13(b)1, which states the subsection shall not be construed to prohibit the equipping of a school bus with a sensor system to determine the presence of a person(s) in the side areas of the school bus in addition to the front and rear of the bus, to add or object(s) after person(s) for consistency and clarity. 1. This subsection shall not be construed to prohibit the equipping of a school bus with a sensor system to determine the presence of a person(s) or object(s) in the side areas of the school bus, in addition to the front and rear of the bus. 2. The Department proposes an amendment at N.J.A.C. 6A:27-7.13(c), which requires the sensor system to include an audible and visual alert system to alert the driver when something is detected in the sensor s designated range, to replace range with area to use more accurate terminology.

(c) The sensor system shall include an audible and visual alert signal placed in the driver s compartment to alert the driver when a person(s) or object(s) is detected within the sensor s designated [[range]] area or a video monitor [[with an audible alert]] placed in the driver s compartment relaying the image of the [[area within the]] sensor s designated [[range]] area. 3. The Department proposes an amendment at N.J.A.C. 6A:27-7.13(b) to correct the date after which all vehicles must comply with the new rules. The current proposal requires every school bus, as defined in the section, manufactured after July 17, 2016 to be equipped with a sensor system. However, it is not possible for school districts and bus manufacturers to comply with the specific requirements of the sensor systems defined in the proposed rules until after the rules are adopted. Therefore, the Department proposes to replace the proposed deadline with six months after the effective date of this section. The Department also proposes to replace the description of the sensor system with a reference to the sensor system as defined in this section for clarity. (b) Every school bus, as defined in this section, manufactured six months after [July 17, 2016] the effective date of this section shall be equipped with a sensor system [[to detect the presence of a person(s) or object(s) in the front and rear of the bus]] as defined in this section. 4. The Department proposes an amendment at N.J.A.C. 6A:27-7.13(c)1, which requires the audible alert signal to be a sound unique to the system, to add for the sensor after audible alert signal. The Department also proposes to replace a sound unique to the system with a sound that is distinctive from all other audible alert signals on the bus to clarify the sound does not have to be unique to all other systems but must be distinctive from the other alert signals on the bus. 1. The audible alert signal for the sensor shall be a sound [[unique to the system]] that is distinctive from all other audible alert signals on the bus.