Urban Development Areas Albemarle County

Similar documents
Urban Development Areas Bedford County

Urban Development Areas Frederick County

DRAFT. Urban Development Areas Fairfax County. UDA Needs Profile: Tysons Corner 13% Location Characteristics. Socio-Economic Characteristics

Urban Development Areas James City County

Urban Development Area (UDA) Process in Virginia: History & Requirements

Living in Albemarle County s Urban Places

Pantops Master Plan Update 2018

BROOKHILL NEIGHBORHOOD MODEL ZONING MAP AMENDMENT PREFACE TO APPLICATION

CHAPTER 7: Transportation, Mobility and Circulation

TRANSIT SUPPORTIVE DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS

VILLAGE OF CLEMMONS PLANNING BOARD DRAFT STAFF REPORT

Land Use & Transportation Primer

Issues Requiring Future Study

495/MetroWest Development Compact Plan Citizen Planner Training Collaborative Conference. March 17, 2012

Corridors. Re-vitalize our Corridors and Gateways

7Page 72 CLEMMONS COMMUNITY COMPASS 5 DEVELOPMENT AND GROWTH

A Neighborhood (Residential, Employment, or Mixed Use) has two components: a Center and a walkable area surrounding the Center.

CHAPTER 7: VISION AND ACTION STATEMENTS. Noble 2025 Vision Statement

Rappahannock- Rapidan Regional Commission

Rio/29 Future Land Use Alternatives. Rio/29 Small Area Plan Phase 1 December 12, 2016

Transportation. Strategies for Action

Town Center (part of the Comprehensive Plan)

CITY OF TARPON SPRINGS DCA#11-1AR

A P P E N D I X B - O P P O R T U N I T Y S I T E S

Floyds Fork Area Study Project Overview, Suitability Analysis, & Form Districts July 29, title

Pine Island Road Corridor Master Plan

Mobility Districts and Traffic Studies

City of Charlottesville

ITEM #8. Regional Smart Growth Program. Regional Smart Growth Program. Presentation Overview. Coast Highway Vision and Stategic Plan.

Dwelling Units Max 12 dwelling units per acre/min 8 dwelling units per acre. Development Mix 80% non residential/20% residential

Proposed Comprehensive Plan Strategies DRAFT for discussion June 28, 2017

Olde Towne Vision Plan

CHAPTER 1. Ms. Guajardo s Class - Central Elementary CH 1 1

III. Design Principles

, C-MS I June 3, 2016 $1500 pd chk #216918

MORRISVILLE TRANSPORTATION PLAN TOWN COUNCIL PRESENTATION AUGUST 22, 2017

Source: Albemarle County Community Development 2011

ATTACHMENT A. Definition of Activity Centers

Subregion 4 Central Avenue-Metro Blue Line Corridor Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) Implementation Project. Community Meeting April 27, 2011

3. ELEMENTS OF THE METRO VISION 2035 PLAN

IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES. In This Chapter. Goals & Strategies 182 Project List 183 Future Land Use 186 CHAPTER 11 IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES

178 Carruthers Properties Inc.

K. SMART ASSOCIATES LIMITED

Broadway District Specific Plan. Community Workshop #2 February 23,2016

Regions are Growing...

Secrest Short Cut and Monroe Expressway Small Area Plan AUGUST 29, 2018

Welcome. Comprehensive Plan & Transportation Plan Open House November 7, 2012

Biscuit Run Gateway. TJPDC staff recommends combining the following projects:

Section 3: Land Use M C H E N R Y K A N E. Figure 3.1: Potential Future Municipal Boundaries. Future Municipal Boundaries. County Land Use Plans

Communities Plan. Parkland-Spanaway-Midland. LUAC Review of Draft Policies

The Floyds Fork Area Study A Framework for Growth

Horizon 2035 Land Use and Transportation Element

1.0 VISION STATEMENT. December 6, PRINCIPLES

City of Woodinville Planning Commission Study Session. Development Regulations 101: An Overview of Specific Regulatory Items To Help You in 2012

LAND USE OVERVIEW WHAT YOU WILL FIND IN THIS CHAPTER

TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PINELLAS COUNTY MPO LIVABLE COMMUNITIES INITIATIVE PINELLAS COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS

ARTICLE 6: Special and Planned Development Districts

Chapter 2: Vision, Goals and Strategies

Improve Neighborhood Design and Reduce Non Point Source Water Pollution

LAND USE ELEMENT. Purpose. General Goals & Policies

DOMINION BOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN A MODEL FOR CHESAPEAKE S FUTURE

SUSSEX COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION WORKSHOP

APPENDIX C SPECIAL PLANNING AREAS

BUILDER LOTS FOR SALE

Germantown Forward Status Report to the Planning Board M NCPPC

4.1.3 LAND USE CATEGORIES

1.0 Future Land Use. 1.1 Introduction. 1.2 Future Land Use Objectives

Linking Land Use and Transportation

Chapter 1 Vision Statement & Goals

4-Town Comprehensive Plan DRAFT 7/30/07

Chapter V-Transportation

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN & UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE

Joint Meeting City Council and the Plan Commission. September 1st, 2015

LAND USE AMENDMENT DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL CORE (WARD 7) MACLEOD TRAIL SE AND 5 AVENUE SE BYLAW 254D2017

Westbound: A One-day Exploration of Growth

Draft Cary Community Plan Review Part 3: Shop, Engage, Serve, Special Area Plans, Other Updates. October 27, 2015 Police Department Training Room

Joint Study Session of the Sutter County. March 2, 2009

TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M. To: Council Members AGENDA ITEM 5H

Dyersville Downtown Plan. Open House October 24, 2017

LAND USE DESIGNATIONS AND ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS

Definitions. Average Daily Traffic Demand (ADT): The actual number or projected number of cars that pass a point in a 24-hour period.

Previous Stakeholder Meetings

Cumberland Region Tomorrow is a private, non-profit, citizen based regional organization working with Greater Nashville Regional Council

Appendix 2. Implementation Project Descriptions Page A2-1

3.10 LAND USE SETTING PROJECT SITE EXISTING LAND USE DESIGNATIONS AND ZONING. General Plan Land Use Designations.

Prepared for the Citizens of Forsyth County by the City-County Planning Board

Urban Planning and Land Use

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRAFT CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Comprehensive Plan Advisory Panel Meeting #3

Amtrak Station Area Planning and Land Use Analysis

Former Rockcliffe Airbase Community Design Plan Guiding Design Vision and Principles December 4, 2013

Places29: List of Implementation Projects

TRANSPORTATION AND LAND USE

Growth Management Planning in the Central Puget Sound Region. Today s Presentation. Puget Sound Region. New Partners for Smart Growth

Draft Memorandum #1: Goals and Vision for Revitalization

CITY OF SACRAMENTO GENERAL PLAN. UC Davis ESP 171 Urban and Regional Planning April 21, 2011

NEIGHBORHOOD DESIGN ELEMENT

Create Policy Options Draft Plan Plan Approval. Public Consultation Events. Phase 2

PSRC REVIEW REPORT & CERTIFICATION RECOMMENDATION

Transcription:

1 Urban Development Areas Albemarle County UDA Needs Profile: All UDAs Albemarle County has two UDAs: the Pantops UDA located east of the Rivanna River and the City of Charlottesville, and Places 29 South, located on Route 29 south of the Rivanna River. Location Characteristics PDC Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission UDA Size 1.3 square miles Year Designated 2011 Socio-Economic Characteristics UDA Characteristics: (Source: LEHD, 2010) Total Population 7,164 persons Total Primary Jobs 2,074 jobs Jobs by Industry Comprehensive Plan Detail - Each of the Albemarle County UDAs Pantops and Places 29 South was previously established as a planning priority area, and has its own master plan. Albemarle County's UDAs are planned for high quality, mixeduse urban neighborhoods and employment centers that are walkable and adequately supported by services and facilities. Geographic Location 5 41% 21% <= $15,000 per 27% 22% Health Care and Social Assistance Retail Trade Finance and Insurance Other Jobs Total Jobs by Earnings 47% 33% $15,000-$39,996 > $39,996 per per Jobs Within a 45 Minute Drive 14,470 Working Age Population Within a 45 Minute Drive 24,261 Source: EPA Smart Location Database (U.S. Census tract data) Jurisdiction Characteristics: Population Growth (Source: Weldon Cooper Center) 2010 26% 2025 99,010 124,589

GAP 1 Urban Development Areas Albemarle County Current Place Type - Small Town or Planned Place Type - Large Town or Future Transportation Needs Internal UDA Needs Transit Operations Transit Facilities Street Grid Intersection Design Roadway Operations Transit Frequency Refer to the DRPT Multimodal System Design Guidelines, Chapter 3, for more details. Transit Capacity /Access Safety Features Traffic Calming On-Street Parking Capacity Transit Frequency Signage/Wayfinding External UDA Needs Transit Operations Transit Capacity /Access Street Grid Roadway Operations Transit Frequency Traffic Calming Safety Features Intersection Design Existing Internal Needs Gap (% shortfall) Transportation system gap by need category (represents the gap to fully promote UDA) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 est Rated Overall Needs within UDA Localities ranked transportation needs within their UDAs (1 being the highest need, to 4 the lowest) Safety for all users Circulation and access beyond UDA Friendly pedestrian bicycle environment

9 Urban Development Areas Charlottesville City UDA Needs Profile: Downtown Corridor UDA The Downtown Corridor UDA is located between Downtown and Main Street in the City of Charlottesville, along the Rivanna River. Location Characteristics PDC Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission UDA Size 0.4 square miles Year Designated 2010 Comprehensive Plan Detail - The City of Charlottesville changed the designation of several mixed-use areas to UDAs, noting that more compact, dense development within the city's urban areas is better and more efficient than low density development. By identifying UDAs and confining urban development to those areas, the city will be able to determine where to direct special, intensive efforts at providing facilities and services. Charlottesville s UDAs were drawn primarily according to the existing development patterns, sewer facilities, and physical characteristics, and include Downtown Extended Corridor/West Main Street, Preston Avenue, and Cherry Avenue. Geographic Location Socio-Economic Characteristics UDA Characteristics: (Source: LEHD, 2010) Total Population 1,665 persons Total Primary Jobs 10,992 jobs 6 5 7% 33% 11% 14% <= $15,000 per Jobs by Industry 49% Total Jobs by Earnings 38% $15,000-$39,996 per Jobs Within a 45 Minute Drive 33,946 Working Age Population Within a 45 Minute Drive 45,393 Source: EPA Smart Location Database (U.S. Census tract data) Jurisdiction Characteristics: Health Care Information Accomodation and Food Services Other Jobs 48% > $39,996 per Population Growth (Source: Weldon Cooper Center) 6.6% 2010 2025 43,435 46,321

GAP 9 Urban Development Areas Charlottesville City Current Place Type - Large Town or Planned Place Type - Urban Core Refer to the DRPT Multimodal System Design Guidelines, Chapter 3, for more details. Future Transportation Needs Internal UDA Needs External UDA Needs Intersection Design Traffic Calming Safety Features Off-Street Parking Improvements to Environment Transit Operations Signage/Wayfinding Off-Street Parking Intersection Design Roadway Operations Transit Frequency Transit Capacity/Access Transit Facilities None listed Safety Features Improvements to Natural Environment Existing Internal Needs Gap (% shortfall) Transportation system gap by need category (represents the gap to fully promote UDA) est Rated Overall Needs within UDA Localities ranked transportation needs within their UDAs (1 being the highest need, to 4 the lowest) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Circulation and Access Access to transportation networks beyond UDA

11 Urban Development Areas Charlottesville City UDA Needs Profile: Cherry Avenue Cherry Avenue UDA is located within the City of Charlottesville, south of Route 29 and the Charlottesville Amtrak station. Location Characteristics PDC Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission UDA Size 0.1 square miles Year Designated 2010 Comprehensive Plan Detail - The City of Charlottesville changed the designation of several mixed-use areas to UDAs, noting that more compact, dense development within the city's urban areas is better and more efficient than low density development; by identifying UDAs and confining urban development to those areas, the city will be able to determine where to direct special, intensive efforts at providing facilities and services. Charlottesville's UDAs were drawn primarily according to the existing development patterns, sewer facilities, and physical characteristics, and include Downtown Extended Corridor/West Main Street, Preston Avenue, and Cherry Avenue. Geographic Location Socio-Economic Characteristics UDA Characteristics: (Source: LEHD, 2010) Total Population 389 persons Total Primary Jobs 85 jobs 6 5 29% 15% 48% Jobs by Industry 29% 27% <= $15,000 per 37% Jobs Within a 45 Minute Drive 2,160 Working Age Population Within a 45 Minute Drive 47,307 Source: EPA Smart Location Database (U.S. Census tract data) Jurisdiction Characteristics: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Retail Trade Accomodation/Food Services Other Jobs Total Jobs by Earnings $15,000-$39,996 per 15% > $39,996 per Population Growth (Source: Weldon Cooper Center) 6.6% 2010 2025 43,435 46,321

GAP 11 Urban Development Areas Charlottesville City Current Place Type - Small Town or Planned Place Type - Large Town or Refer to the DRPT Multimodal System Design Guidelines, Chapter 3, for more details. Future Transportation Needs Internal UDA Needs External UDA Needs Improvements to Environment Improvements to Environment Transit Operations None listed Transit Facilities Signage/Wayfinding Existing Internal Needs Gap (% shortfall) Transportation system gap by need category (represents the gap to fully promote UDA) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 est Rated Overall Needs within UDA Localities ranked transportation needs within their UDAs (1 being the highest need, to 4 the lowest) Circulation and access within the UDA Access to transportation networks beyond the UDA

15 Urban Development Areas Fauquier County UDA Needs Profile: All UDAs Fauquier County has two UDAs: the Bealeton UDA located around the intersection of Route 28 and U.S. 17, and the Marshall UDA located near the I-66/U.S. 17 interchange. Location Characteristics PDC Rappahannock-Rapidan Regional Commission UDA Size 1.1 square miles Year Designated 2014 Comprehensive Plan Detail - The designation of Urban Development Areas is consistent with the land use plans for the town center core area of the Bealeton Service District and the downtown core (Main Street and Salem Avenue) of the Marshall Service District. Land uses within these two areas include mixed-use neighborhoods and a mix of housing types. The service district plans for Bealeton and Marshall provide specific guidance in the employment of traditional town design standards applicable to the designated UDAs. Geographic Location Socio-Economic Characteristics UDA Characteristics: (Source: LEHD, 2010) Total Population - 1,827 persons Total Primary Jobs 80 jobs 6 5 11% 18% 49% <= $15,000 per Jobs by Industry 41% Total Jobs by Earnings 45% $15,000-$39,996 per Accomodation/Food Services Retail Trade Professional and Technical Other Jobs 6. > $39,996 per Jobs Within a 45 Minute Drive 26,398 Working Age Population Within a 45 Minute Drive 55,205 Source: EPA Smart Location Database (U.S. Census tract data) Jurisdiction Characteristics: Population Growth (Source: Weldon Cooper Center) 2010 2025 65,203 83,312

GAP 15 Urban Development Areas Fauquier County Current Place Type - Small Town or Planned Place Type - Small Town or Refer to the DRPT Multimodal System Design Guidelines, Chapter 3, for more details. Future Transportation Needs Internal UDA Needs External UDA Needs Pedestrian infrastructure Pedestrian infrastructure Complete streets improvements Street grid (better street connectivity Bicycle infrastructure Bicycle infrastructure Safety features Safety features Signage/wayfinding Intersection design improvements Improvements to the natural environment Signage/wayfinding Traffic calming features Improvements to the natural environment Existing Internal Needs Gap (% shortfall) Transportation system gap by need category (represents the gap to fully promote UDA) 10 9 8 7 6 5 est Rated Overall Needs within UDA Localities ranked transportation needs within their UDAs (1 being the highest need, to 4 the lowest) Safety for all users Friendly pedestrian and bicycle environment

16 Urban Development Areas Fluvanna County UDA Needs Profile: Zion Crossroads Fluvanna County contains a single UDA, located along the northern border of the county near I-64. The UDA serves as the gateway to Fluvanna County from I-64 via U.S. 15. Location Characteristics PDC Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission UDA Size 3.2 square miles Year Designated 2009 Comprehensive Plan Detail - Fluvanna County's 2009 Future Land Use Map designates Zion Crossroads as the County's Urban Development Area (UDA). This location was chosen because it correlates with the Zion Crossroads community planning area and the intersection of two existing major transportation networks. The County's strategy is very much in line with the intent and community development principles of UDAs: to encourage village-like development in select areas, while preserving the natural and agricultural character of outlying areas. Geographic Location Socio-Economic Characteristics UDA Characteristics: (Source: LEHD, 2010) Total Population 916 persons Total Primary Jobs 198 jobs 6 29% 16% 28% <= $15,000 per Jobs by Industry 22% 33% Total Jobs by Earnings 5 $15,000-$39,996 per Administration & Support, Waste Management and Remediation Construction Accommodation and Food Services 22% > $39,996 per Jobs Within a 45 Minute Drive 9,920 Working Age Population Within a 45 Minute Drive 1,650 Source: EPA Smart Location Database (U.S. Census tract data) Jurisdiction Characteristics: Population Growth (Source: Weldon Cooper Center) 2010 18% 2025 25,691 30,343

GAP 16 Urban Development Areas Fluvanna County Current Place Type - Rural or Village Center Planned Place Type - Rural or Village Center Refer to the DRPT Multimodal System Design Guidelines, Chapter 3, for more details. Future Transportation Needs Internal UDA Needs External UDA Needs Roadway Operations Safety Features Intersection Design Signage/Wayfinding Traffic Calming Improvements to the Natural Environment Intersection Design Improvements to Natural Environment Existing Internal Needs Gap (% shortfall) Transportation system gap by need category (represents the gap to fully promote UDA) est Rated Overall Needs within UDA Localities ranked transportation needs within their UDAs (1 being the highest need, to 4 the lowest) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Circulation and access within the UDA Friendly pedestrian and bicycle environment