DOWNTOWN AREA PLAN. June 9, 2009

Similar documents
DRAFT Land Use Chapter

The Five Components of the McLoughlin Area Plan

Economy Vision Statements: Social Wellbeing Vision Statements: Natural Environment Vision Statements:

Item #9 March 16, 2011

WEST LOOP DESIGN GUIDELINES CHECKLIST

Concord Community Reuse Project Goals and Guiding Principles. Overarching Goals (OG)

Visioning Statement and Guiding Principles

EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Town Center (part of the Comprehensive Plan)

DALY CITY VISIONING PROCESS COMMUNITY WORKSHOP 3 MAY 8, 2008

Create Policy Options Draft Plan Plan Approval. Public Consultation Events. Phase 2

WEST OAKLAND SPECIFIC PLAN Final Plan. 2. Vision & Goals. 2.1 Community-Based Goals and Objectives

TOD 101 CREATING LIVABLE COMMUNITIES WITH TRANSIT

CHAPTER 3 VISION, GOALS, & PLANNING PRINCIPLES. City of Greensburg Comprehensive Plan. Introduction. Vision Statement. Growth Management Goals.

Draft Bergamot Area Plan

Planning for TOD Implementation at a Corridor Scale

Plano Tomorrow Vision and Policies

City of Woodinville Planning Commission Study Session. Development Regulations 101: An Overview of Specific Regulatory Items To Help You in 2012

REGIONAL ACTIVITY CENTER

Today Land & People. Northeast Nampa Gateway District. Employment. Land Use Characteristics. Demographics. Current Zoning

THE NEIGHBORHOOD TODAY

Planning for TOD Implementation at a Corridor Scale

greenprint midtown SUSTAINABILITY ACTION PLAN 2012

TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PINELLAS COUNTY MPO LIVABLE COMMUNITIES INITIATIVE PINELLAS COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS

The Vision. Photo provided by The Minervini Group. 46 Vision, Objectives & Strategies

North Fair Oaks Community Plan Summary and Information

Little Mountain UDP Presentation

Issues Requiring Future Study

Northwest commuter rail station US 36 BRT. Westminster Station

Chapter 3 Community Vision, Values, and Guiding Principles

3.1 community vision. 3.3 required plan elements

Berkeley Strategic Transportation Plan

Affordability & Equity

Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit Transit Oriented Development (BRTOD) Helmo Station Area Plan

Glenborough at Easton Land Use Master Plan

Making Transit Oriented Development Work For Boonton, NJ

Urban Design Manual PLANNING AROUND RAPID TRANSIT STATIONS (PARTS) Introduction. Station Study Areas

Plan-It Greenville (2009) Comprehensive Plan 5-Year Update

City Council Presentation November 6, 2017

APN#: Lot Size: ±5,625 SF. Vacant corner lot. Current Height Limit: 70 FT. Current Zoning: CB - Central Business District

From: Mayor Sam Liccardo Councilmember Chappie Jones Councilmember Dev Davis Subject: SEE BELOW Date: June 23, 2017

The University District envisions, in its neighborhood

FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT

Chapter 1: Introduction

TOD 203 CORRIDOR PLANNING and TOD

Transit-Oriented Development

THE GREEN VISION WORKSHOP Friday, November 6, 2009

K. SMART ASSOCIATES LIMITED

Windsor Locks Transit-Oriented Development Planning Grant Request. Project Background

FRUITVALE TRANSIT VILLAGE (Phase 2) Residential Project

THE GAS PLANT DISTRICT MASTER PLAN SCENARIO 2. COMMUNITY MEETING August 6, 2018

A. WHAT IS A GENERAL PLAN?

LAND USE DESIGNATIONS AND ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS

Workshop. Valley Vision Stanislaus. Our Schedule. Help Shape Our Region s Future! The Scenarios. Who is StanCOG? How Do I Select a Scenario?

Shift Rapid Transit Public Participation Meeting May 3, 2017

Integrated Urban Development. April Reflections from the NZPI Study Tour of Portland, Seattle and Vancouver

Northwest Rail Corridor and US 36 BRT Development Oriented Transit Analysis 4.4 STATION AREA FINDINGS

CENTRAL ESTUARY PLAN AVISION FOR OAKLAND S WATERFRONT

The Village of Shirlington

Urban Planning and Land Use

East Central Area Plan

City of Villages Parking Strategies. William Anderson, FAICP City Planning & Community Investment San Diego Parking Symposium July 14, 2006

Silver Line CPAM UPDATE. Transportation and Land Use Committee October 14, 2016

Key Themes and Responses May 2016

Cumberland Region Tomorrow is a private, non-profit, citizen based regional organization working with Greater Nashville Regional Council

TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PLAN PRESENTATION RED-PURPLE BYPASS PROJECT AREA

40 Years of Smart Growth Arlington County s Experience with Transit Oriented Development in the Rosslyn-Ballston Metro Corridor

CITY OF UNION CITY MINUTES GENERAL PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE

Blueprint Denver A BLUEPRINT FOR AN INCLUSIVE CITY. Executive Summary

Tyvola & Archdale Transit Station Area Plan. June 5, 2008

City of Langford Green Development Checklist

Increase density to meet housing and affordability goals and to support transit investments.

Corridor-Level Approaches to Creating Transit-Oriented Districts

SECTION ONE: INTRODUCTION. introduction

Subject: 30 Otis Street, Evaluation of Shadow on Proposed 11th and Natoma Park

Additional information about land use types is given in Chapter 5. Design guidelines for Centers and Neighborhoods are given in Chapter 7.

New Official Plan Quest November 2013

Midtown Greenway Land Use and Development Plan Executive Summary

MALL REVITALIZATION CASE STUDIES

CHARLES PUTMAN CHARLES PUTMAN AND ASSOCIATES, INC

Welcome to the Oakridge Centre Open House

1.0 VISION STATEMENT. December 6, PRINCIPLES

3.0 URBAN DESIGN. December 6, OVERVIEW

SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY RESPONSE POST ON GEORGIA 349 W GEORGIA ST REZONING APPLICATION REV 2 - UDP ADDENDUM

C. Westerly Creek Village & The Montview Corridor

International Blvd. TOD Plan Public Workshop #1

TOD IMPLEMENTATION BEST PRACTICE TOOLBOX Leveraging Transit for City Shaping

Study Area. Capitol Way. Greening America s Capitals 11/13/2014. A Greening America s Capitals Project

Transportation. Strategies for Action

South Davis County COMMUNITY SPOTLIGHT

City Of Sparks Planning Commission Item

APPENDIX D: BACKGROUND AND VISION

The Cambie Corridor 2015 Fall workshop series. What we heard WORKSHOP OUTLINE

Sahuarita District & Phase 1 Master Plan. Town Council December 11, 2017

Zoning and Development Considerations in the Boothbay Harbor Maritime/Water Dependent District

GO Station Mobility Hubs: Draft Precinct Plans. Committee of the Whole July 12, 2018

178 Carruthers Properties Inc.

Key Concepts of the General Plan

Danvers High Street I-1 District Study

TRANSIT NEIGHBORHOOD PLANS PROGRAM OVERVIEW

Transcription:

DOWNTOWN AREA PLAN June 9, 2009

Issues Identified by Councilmembers Overlap with Southside Plan Southwest Residential Area & Herrick Shadows & Residential Areas Shadows on Streets & Canyon Effect Transit & BRT Center Street Plaza LEED Ratings & Green Building Precedents Labor Jobs-Housing Affordable Housing Contributions from Developers

Southside Plan & Downtown Area Plan Overlapping Area Overlapping Southside & Downtown Area Planning Areas

Areas to Remain Residential Use Southside Plan Place Residential Areas in Southside Plan

Parcel Appropriate as Mixed-Use Use DAP Corridor-Buffer Place Commercial & Potential Mixed-Use in DAP

Potential DAP Mixed-Use BUT Only if Affordable Housing

* Herrick Southwest Residential Area & Herrick

Shadow Impacts on Residential Areas Shadow Impacts on December 21 (worst case) 9am 3pm

Shadows on Streets & Canyon Effect EXISTING ZONING 65 Generally Allowed Height No Hotel Provisions 89 Exceptions 1800 New Dwellings (360 Affordable) DAPAC 85 Generally Allowed Height 225 Hotels with Condos 100 + 120 Exceptions 2700 New Dwellings (540 Affordable) PLANNING COMMISSION 85 Generally Allowed Height 225 Hotels with Condos 120 + 180 Exceptions 3100 New Dwellings (620 Affordable) Existing Zoning 65 Shown DAPAC 120 Shown Planning Commission 85 Base w/ 180 Shown

Shadow Impacts on Streets * Existing Zoning DAPAC Planning Commission * * * Equinox (March/September) at Noon 80 Street Right-of-Way

Policies on Building Form Use Stepbacks Design to Avoid Wind & Solar Impacts Require Solar & Wind Simulations Avoid Abrupt Transitions to Residential (45 max. adj. to resid l) Limits on Number of Tall Buildings Throughout Downtown For Each Narrow Street ** * 180 *

Transit Service & Design BRT-Specific or for All Transit? Proposed Bus Rapid Transit Alignment (AC Transit)

Center Street Plaza Inclusive Decision-Making Closing Center Other Options

LEED Ratings Certified 26 points change in cost -0.4 to +2.0% Silver 33 points -0.3 to + 4.0% Gold 39 points +0.5 to +8.0% Platinum 52 points +4.8 to 8.5% LEED application runs $30,000 to $100,000. GreenPoints or City could provide an equivalent standard. LEED Performance Areas & Prerequisites Site Location/Design (14 points) w/ Prerequisite of Erosion and Sediment Control (also CA State law) Energy (17 points) w/ Prerequisites for Commissioning (10% better than CA Title 24) Materials (13 points) w/ Prerequisite of Space for Recyclables (also CA State law) Indoor Air Quality (15 points) w/ Prerequisite for Ventilation and Smoking Prohibitions Water Efficiency (5 points) w/ No Prerequisites

Best Practices from Other Cities San Francisco Requires LEED Silver for projects over 25,000 square feet Plans to require LEED Gold in 2012 No projects constructed yet under this policy. Albany Requires LEED Gold for projects over 20,000 square feet No projects constructed yet under this policy. Santa Monica Green Building Code requires (among other things): Energy Performance 10% better than Title 24 Green Materials List Construction Waste Diversion Rate of 65% (Berkeley req s 50% mixed 100% asphalt) Downtown Area Plan Significantly exceed Title 24 (both DAPAC & Planning Commission) Set standard at LEED Gold or Greenpoint Equivalent or City Equivalent (DAPAC required while Planning Commission called for its consideration)

Apprenticeships, Local Hiring, Living Wage Both DAP version support job training, apprenticeships, & local hiring.

Jobs-Housing Balance Commute Patterns Synergies with UC Berkeley Limits on Tall Office Buildings Comparison of Employment in Berkeley versus Employed Berkeley Residents

Affordable Housing Affordability through Location Coordination with Housing Element and Housing Ordinance General Affordability Provisions Condominium Conversions Commercial Impact Fees for Housing Specific Workforce & Economic Diversity Targets Actionable by Downtown Area Plan Deeper Affordability for Taller Projects Projects in the Downtown Area (Housing Trust Fund) Encouraging More Projects

Developer Contributions Minimums and/or cumulative Point System? What are your priorities? Affordable Housing Green Buildings Open Space Green Infrastructure Transportation Historic Preservation Cultural Uses

Downtown Area Plan Next Steps

End of Show

VISION STATEMENT Downtown is the heart of Berkeley where people enjoy urban life. Downtown models Berkeley s commitment to sustainability. Downtown seeks to minimize human impacts on the environment, through its emphasis on walking, bicycling, transit, green streets, and green architecture. Downtown is an economically vibrant destination. Downtown increasingly serves Berkeley s residents and visitors with attractive retail, exceptional restaurants, community services, and remarkable parks and plazas. Downtown celebrates its proximity to a public university internationally renowned for its academic accomplishment and its physical beauty. Downtown s cultural, educational and historic assets form the foundation for its success. Downtown is a great neighborhood that is oriented to the pedestrian. It offers diverse housing opportunities for all kinds of people, with an emphasis on affordability and supportive services. Safe and tree-lined streets, shops, services, and amenities make it possible to meet most daily needs on foot.

DAPAC Planning Commission

Project Feasibility (as influenced by building code & construction costs) 55, 75, & 180 heights are likely to be viable in the next market cycle. 140 could be feasible in 10-15 years. Residential projects at 85, 100 and 120 are infeasible in typical situations. x x x 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 Stories 1 woodframe over concrete concrete + steel only b1 b2 b3 b4 Underground Parking 55 5-Story 75 7-Story 85 7-Story 100 9-Story 55' 75' 85" 100' 120 11-Story 140 13-Story 180 17-Story 120' 140' 180' Seventeen

Households not accommodated Downtown will be built in locations that are more car-reliant. Driving, Density & Affordability Cost per Mile = 58.5 cents Federal Tax Code for 2008 Suburbs Urban Neighborhoods: $700 per Month City Centers: $200 per Month vehicle-miles traveled = VMT

Enhancements to Streets & Open Space PREVIOUS SLIDE

PEDESTRIAN-FRIENDLY PLACES New Street Enhancements at End of University Avenue Existing Conditions