High Speed Rail (London- West Midlands)

Similar documents
E16: MAINTENANCE OF LANDSCAPED AREAS

Archaeology and Planning in Greater London. A Charter for the Greater London Archaeology Advisory Service

Learning Legacy Document

12 TH ANNUAL CHILTERNS AONB PLANNING CONFERENCE ENGLISH HERITAGE: HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT GOOD PRACTICE ADVICE

An Introduction to Heritage

Interim Advice Note 76 / 06 ASSESSMENT PART 1 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT. Contents

Foreword. Síle de Valera, TD, Minister for Arts, Heritage, Gaeltacht and the Islands

Cotswolds AONB Landscape Strategy and Guidelines. June 2016

Fixing the Foundations Statement

DESIGN AND MANAGEMENT PART 1 HA 75/01 TRUNK ROADS AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL MITIGATION SUMMARY

HS2 Environment. Protecting the environment

Ebbsfleet Development Corporation

CORRECTIONS WITHIN DESIGN MANUAL FOR ROADS AND BRIDGES AUGUST 2009

PLANNING FOR THE SUPPLY OF BUILDING AND ROOFING STONE The Planning Officers Society 2008

PPS5: Planning for the Historic Environment

TRANSPORT AND WORKS ACT 1992 TRANSPORT AND WORKS (APPLICATIONS AND OBJECTIONS PROCEDURE)(ENGLAND AND WALES) RULES 2006

3. Neighbourhood Plans and Strategic Environmental Assessment

volume 11 environmental assessment section 2 environmental impact assessment Part 7 ha 218/08

European code of good practice: "ARCHAEOLOGY AND THE URBAN PROJECT"

Euston Community Forum. 11 June Maria Fidelis School

3 Urban Design and the State Highway Network

THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK BYLAW NO A bylaw to adopt Amendment No. 6 to the Official Plan for The Regional Municipality of York

11/04/2016. NPPF Paragraph 128. NPPF Paragraph 128. NPPF Paragraph 128. NPPF Paragraph 128. NPPF Paragraph 128

DCLG Consultation on Basement Developments and the Planning System Historic England Submission

Heritage Action Zone. Explanatory Notes and Guidance

Longmore House Salisbury Place Edinburgh EH9 1SH. 18 January 2008

Call for Proposals. Heritage, natural capital and ecosystem services: case studies. Project No: Date of Issue: Tuesday 14 th November 2017

7. The Landscape. 7.1 Introduction. Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Scoping Report

Assessing the Significance of the key characteristics of Historic Landscape Character Areas: a Discussion Paper

11. ISLINGTON ROUTE SECTION ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE AND ASSESSMENT OF IMPACTS OVERVIEW OF ISLINGTON ROUTE SECTION... 2

Protocol between Local Housing Authorities and Fire and Rescue Authorities to improve fire safety

ICOMOS NEW ZEALAND CHARTER FOR THE CONSERVATION OF PLACES OF CULTURAL HERITAGE VALUE

Sustainability Statement. Whitby Business Park Area Action Plan

Policy DM19: Development and Nature Conservation

Fire Safety Policy SH HS 06. Version: 4. Summary:

Site Assessment Technical Document Appendix A: Glossary

Legal protection of monuments in their settings: a means of maintaining the spirit of the place

HIGHWAY STRUCTURES: INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE PART 4 BD 89/03 THE CONSERVATION OF HIGHWAY STRUCTURES SUMMARY

Hornsea Project Three Offshore Wind Farm

Development in the setting of the Cotswolds AONB

Policy and Resources Committee 10 th October Green Infrastructure Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) Summary. Title

Electrical Safety Policy

HS2 Interchange Station Design

DESIGN MANUAL FOR ROADS AND BRIDGES

State Planning Policy state interest guidance material. Cultural heritage

Designations protecting the historic designed landscape

Newcourt Masterplan. November Exeter Local Development Framework

ICOMOS New Zealand Charter For The Conservation of Places Of Cultural Heritage Value

Strategic Environmental Assessment Screening Report. Dublin Port Masterplan Review 2017

INTRODUCTION NORTH HEYBRIDGE GARDEN SUBURB

PART 3-O REQUIREMENTS FOR SPRINKLER SYSTEMS MAINTENANCE AND SUPERVISION. 3-O Introduction O.1 Scope of Maintenance and Supervision...

Appendix 1 Structure plan guidelines

Babergh and Mid Suffolk Joint Draft Local Plan Consultation, August 2017, Public Consultation

Local Authority Involvement in the Historic Environment

PANSHANGER QUARRY, Hertfordshire

Neighbourhood Planning Local Green Spaces

Great Easton Neighbourhood Plan Statement of Basic Conditions

Mid Suffolk District Council Planning Control Department 131 High Street Needham Market IP6 8DL

Environmental Impact Assessment for Waterway Restoration Projects. Chris John, Technical Director Ecus Ltd.

Guidelines for Archaeological Projects in Greater London

a) buildings, structures and artifacts of historical significance;

FIRE SAFETY POLICY Revised March 2013

Memorials, Plaques & Interpretive Signs Policy

HS2 Hybrid Bill Petitioning. Summary of SMBC Asks 23/09/13. Background

Fire risk management plan. MH/05/Revised/06/17

Value Paper Authors: Stuart Nunns CEng, BSc, FIET, FInstMC. Compliance to IEC means more than just Pfd!

Perth and Kinross Council Development Management Committee 24 April 2013 Report of Handling by Development Quality Manager

Cottenham Civil Parish. Neighbourhood Development Plan to 2031

Perth and Kinross Council Development Management Committee 8 June Pre-Application Report by Development Quality Manager

Circular L8/08 2 September Water Services Investment and Rural Water Programmes Protection of Natural Heritage and National Monuments

Departure from the Development Plan. Town Council objection to a major application. DETERMINE

HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT SCOTLAND

HeritageCollectiveLLP

Examination of South Cambridgeshire Local Plan

For the Design, Installation, Commissioning & Maintenance of Fire Detection and Fire Alarm Systems

Suffolk Coastal Local Plan Review Issues and Options, August 2017, Public Consultation

Reference: 15/06961/RCU Received: 13th November 2015 Accepted: 17th November 2015 Ward: Coppetts Expiry 12th January 2016

26 September 2014 CONSULTATION EXPIRY : APPLICATION EXPIRY : 22 July 2014 SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION: PERMISSION

The Gas Safety (Installations and Use) Regulations 1998.

GK/GN0612. Guidance on Signalling Lockout Systems to Protect Railway. Undertaking Personnel. Railway Group Guidance for GK/RT0212.

Canterbury City Council Military Road Canterbury Kent CT1 1YW. Title: CA/16/01506/FUL. Author: Planning and Regeneration.

Summary of Heritage Input

Environmental Impact Assessment. York Glasgow Edinburgh

Environmental Memorandum

PART 5 - NATURAL AND PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT

1. Legislation and policy on the protection of the archaeological heritage during road construction Seán Kirwan

Solar Electric (Photovoltaic) Panels and Slates on Listed Places of Worship

London Road, Derker. Non Technical Summary. Introduction

Assessing the impact of smallscale wind energy proposals on the natural heritage

volume 11 environmental assessment section 2 environmental impact assessment Part 2 ha 202/08 environmental impact assessment

Everton s Neighbourhood Plan. Site Allocation - Assessment Criteria

Yorkshire Sculpture Park Historic Landscape Management Plan. Volume I. July 2010

TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT SECTION 79 AND TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING (INQUIRIES PROCEDURE) (ENGLAND) RULES 2000 STATEMENT OF CASE OF

MANAGING CHANGE IN THE HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT. Historic Battlefields August 2016

APPLICATION NUMBER CB/15/00297/OUT Land West of Bidwell (Houghton Regis North Site. Houghton Regis

BRE Strategic Ecological Framework LI Technical Information Note 03/2016

HERITAGE POLICY...Safeguarding the Built Heritage. Conservation Plans. A Guide to the Preparation of Conservation Plans

South Worcestershire Development Plan. South Worcestershire Design Guide Supplementary Planning Document

Welcome to the Public Consultation Exhibition

Management Standard: Fire Safety

Transcription:

High Speed Rail (London- West Midlands) Draft Environmental Minimum Requirements Annex 3: Draft Heritage Memorandum November 2013 ESA 4.4

High Speed Rail (London- West Midlands) Draft Environmental Minimum Requirements Annex 3: Draft Heritage Memorandum November 2013 ESA 4.4

High Speed Two (HS2) Limited has been tasked by the Department for Transport (DfT) with managing the delivery of a new national high speed rail network. It is a non-departmental public body wholly owned by the DfT. A report prepared for High Speed Two (HS2) Limited. High Speed Two (HS2) Limited, Eland House, Bressenden Place, London SW1E 5DU Details of how to obtain further copies are available from HS2 Ltd. Telephone: 020 7944 4908 General email enquiries: HS2enquiries@hs2.org.uk Website: www.hs2.org.uk High Speed Two (HS2) Limited has actively considered the needs of blind and partially sighted people in accessing this document. The text will be made available in full on the HS2 website. The text may be freely downloaded and translated by individuals or organisations for conversion into other accessible formats. If you have other needs in this regard please contact High Speed Two (HS2) Limited. Printed in Great Britain on paper containing at least 75% recycled fibre.

Annex 3 High Speed Rail (London-West Midlands) Draft Heritage Memorandum i

ii

Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.2 Scope of the Memorandum 1 1.3 Purpose and understanding 1 2 Aim of the Memorandum 2 3 Objectives 2 4 Engagement 3 4.1 The Planning Forum 3 4.2 Heritage Sub-Group 3 4.3 Location-specific engagement 3 5 Mitigation: investigation and recording 3 5.1 Overview 3 5.2 Setting of heritage assets 4 5.3 Sustainability 4 5.4 Standards and professional competence 4 5.5 Programme of heritage investigation works 4 5.6 Mitigation of heritage assets 5 6 Unexpected major discoveries of national significance 6 7 Disapplication of heritage legislation 7 7.1 Introduction 7 7.2 Listed buildings 7 7.3 Scheduled monuments 7 8 Disapplication of human remains and burial monuments legislation 7 iii

iv

1 Introduction 1.1.1 The Heritage Memorandum is part of the suite of documents forming the Phase One of HS2 Environmental Minimum Requirements (EMRs) - the overarching commitment by the nominated undertaker to afford appropriate management and protection of people, communities and the natural, cultural and built environment. 1.2 Scope of the Memorandum 1.2.1 This Heritage Memorandum sets out how the historic environment (including heritage assets and their setting), will be addressed during the design and construction of Phase One of HS2. It is not intended that this Memorandum duplicate other components of the EMRs. 1.2.2 Other components of the EMRs are: the Code of Construction Practice (CoCP) which covers the nominated undertaker s responsible approach to environmental protection and limiting disturbance from construction activities, including other environmental issues such as noise and dust; the Environmental Memorandum which covers the environmental aspects of the design and construction, including for example, landscape, nature conservation and public open space; and the Planning Memorandum, which covers the handling of planning matters arising from Schedule 16 (Planning Conditions Schedule). 1.3 Purpose and understanding 1.3.1 The Heritage Memorandum provides a framework for the nominated undertaker, English Heritage, local authorities and other stakeholders to work together to ensure that the design and construction of Phase One of High Speed 2 works is carried out with due regard for heritage considerations. 1.3.2 Definitions of the historic environment and heritage assets are set out in the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF, Annex 2 Glossary) and these definitions are used in the Memorandum: Historic environment: All aspects of the environment resulting from the interaction between people and places through time, including all surviving physical remains of past human activity, whether visible, buried or submerged, and landscape and planted or managed flora. Heritage assets: A building, monument, site, place, area or landscape identified as having a degree of significance meriting consideration in planning decisions because of its heritage interest. Setting: The surroundings in which a heritage asset is experienced. Its extent is not fixed and may change as the asset and its surroundings evolve. Elements of a setting may make a positive or negative contribution to the significance of 1

an asset, may affect the ability to appreciate that significance or may be neutral. Significance: The value of a heritage asset to this and future generations because of its heritage interest. That interest may be archaeological, architectural, artistic or historic. Significance derives not only from a heritage asset s physical presence, but also from its setting. 2 Aim of the Memorandum 2.1.1 The High Speed Rail (London-West Midlands) Bill (the Bill) provides powers for the construction and operation of Phase One of HS2 and planning permission is deemed to be granted for the works authorised by it. 2.1.2 This Memorandum presents the commitments of the Secretary of State to the historic environment and heritage assets and addresses the elements of the works authorised by the Bill that have a direct impact on it. Direct impacts comprise both physical impacts and those on the setting of a heritage asset. 2.1.3 This Memorandum sets out: Objectives: The high level objectives to be adhered to by the nominated undertaker in relation to the historic environment including designated and non-designated heritage assets. Engagement: The approach to engagement with English Heritage, local authorities and other stakeholders. Mitigation: investigation and recording: The approach to the mitigation of direct impacts on the historic environment and individual heritage assets. Disapplication of heritage legislation: The arrangements for obtaining agreement to works on designated heritage assets. Disapplication of Human remains and burial monuments legislation: The arrangements in relation to human remains and burial monuments over 100 years old where archaeological investigation may be undertaken. 3 Objectives 3.1.1 In taking forward the detailed design and construction of HS2, the nominated undertaker will have proper regard to the policies set out in the NPPF, notably Section 12 Conserving and enhancing the historic environment, in order to protect the settings, character and amenity of scheduled monuments, listed buildings, conservation areas and other heritage assets (including archaeological sites and deposits). 3.1.2 HS2 Ltd has sought to avoid direct impacts on heritage assets during the development of the route and design of HS2 and its associated works. Where avoidance has not been practicable, the nominated undertaker will deliver a programme of heritage 2

mitigation, including, but not limited to investigation, recording, analysis, reporting and archiving. 3.1.3 Appropriate regard will continue to be given to the setting of heritage assets during the development of the design to integrate the works with the historic environment. 4 Engagement 4.1 The Planning Forum 4.1.1 For qualifying authorities, the Planning Memorandum sets out the principles to be taken into account as the material considerations or grounds in the determination of requests of the approval of details. 4.1.2 The nominated undertaker seeks to engage with English Heritage, local authorities and other stakeholders in an effective manner on heritage matters. 4.2 Heritage Sub-Group 4.2.1 A Heritage sub-group to the Planning Forum has been set up and this group will meet throughout the design and construction period. The purpose of the Heritage subgroup is to provide the framework for effective engagement and information sharing on high level technical heritage matters. 4.2.2 The objectives of the Heritage sub-group are to: Enable engagement on high level technical heritage matters between the nominated undertaker, English Heritage and local authorities. Discuss and agree route-wide heritage principles and practices to be applied, as appropriate, at the Project level. Facilitate the integration of heritage matters into other aspects of the design process. 4.3 Location-specific engagement 4.3.1 During the development of the detailed design, and the implementation of construction works, the nominated undertaker will continue to engage with English Heritage and the relevant local authority (and other stakeholders, where necessary) on the approach to the mitigation of affected heritage assets on a location specific basis, or any other grouping of assets as appropriate to the arrangement of the works. 5 Mitigation: investigation and recording 5.1 Overview 5.1.1 In selecting the route of HS2, full regard has been given to the need to avoid, or, where unavoidable, to constrain any impacts on areas of heritage interest, with specific regard to designated heritage assets. There will also be the loss of, or 3

modifications to non-designated heritage assets. All heritage assets (designated and non-designated) are included in the statements below. 5.2 Setting of heritage assets 5.2.1 Mitigating the impact of the HS2 works on the setting of heritage assets is addressed in the Environmental Memorandum. The planning conditions in Schedule 16 sets out those areas where a determining qualifying authority (usually a local authority) will be requested to approve certain plans and specifications, as well as other submissions. 5.2.2 The Environmental Memorandum sets out the approach to landscape and visual mitigation which takes account of the historic environment. The design of new and modified structures, landscape works and noise mitigation will be developed during detailed design. It is recognised that this work may have implications for the setting of nearby heritage assets, notably designated assets, and appropriate regard will be given to this. Mitigation measures will be developed in consultation with other disciplines. 5.3 Sustainability 5.3.1 The programme of heritage works will contribute to the HS2 Sustainability Policy. HS2 will have an impact on the historic environment - a finite resource. The heritage investigation programme will contribute to the Sustainability Plan, setting goals relevant to particular stages of the project. 5.3.2 The results of the mitigation works will advance our understanding of the significance of the historic environment and individual heritage assets. The nominated undertaker will seek to maximise the opportunities for dissemination and outreach that this information brings. 5.4 Standards and professional competence 5.4.1 All works affecting heritage assets undertaken in connection with HS2 works will be carried out by suitably qualified, experienced and competent individual professionals and organisations. The nominated undertaker will require all such works undertaken to have appropriate regard to national planning policy, accepted industry practice, national guidelines and codes of practice appropriate to the project; this includes publications by English Heritage, the Institute for Archaeologists and the Institute for Historic Building Conservation. 5.5 Programme of heritage investigation works 5.5.1 The nominated undertaker will develop an integrated programme to deliver the heritage mitigation works outlined in the Environmental Statement and as developed during the detailed design process. The programme will set out the key stages of mitigation, for example: Detailed desk-based assessment; Field evaluation (to inform location specific mitigation); 4

Location specific mitigation; and Post excavation. 5.5.2 The heritage investigation programme will be developed in light of, and in conjunction with, the overall construction programme and will be reviewed and updated, as appropriate to allow the management of the works. The management of construction is set out in the CoCP. 5.6 Mitigation of heritage assets Generic written scheme of investigation 5.6.1 Route-wide approaches will be developed by the nominated undertaker in consultation with English Heritage and local authorities via the Heritage sub-group. A route-wide generic written scheme of investigation (GWSIs) will be prepared setting out the general principles for design, evaluation, mitigation, analysis, reporting and archive deposition to be adopted for the design development and construction of the Proposed Scheme. Approach to location-specific mitigation 5.6.2 Before enabling and construction works begin, the research undertaken for the ES will be reviewed. Where required, for the purposes of delivering mitigation, additional detailed desk-based assessment and/or field evaluation will be carried out and this will inform the development of location specific mitigation works (a location specific Written Scheme of Investigation (WSI)). These documents will be developed in consultation with English Heritage and the relevant local authority and will follow the principles set out in the GWSI. 5.6.3 Mitigation works may include the protection and preservation of assets in situ, investigation and recording in advance of enabling and construction, and/or the implementation of investigation and recording during enabling and construction works. It may be preferable in some instances to preserve archaeological deposits where they are found, and this may be achieved through design. 5.6.4 The location specific WSIs will include a programme for heritage work and where appropriate, will show time periods and sequence of heritage work as an integrated part of the enabling and construction works programme. 5.6.5 Once heritage investigations are complete, then the records generated and the artefact and samples collected will be assessed and analysed. The results of that work will be published via a range of media and approaches to this work will be developed with English Heritage and the relevant local authority. The nominated undertaker will work with English Heritage and local authorities to identify suitable repository/ies to enable the deposition of the artefacts and records generated by the heritage works. Code of Construction Practice 5.6.6 The Code of Construction Practice (CoCP) will be implemented during the planning and undertaking of construction works. The provisions of the CoCP will be imposed by the nominated undertaker on the principal contractors by means of the works 5

contracts. The CoCP (Section 8) sets out the provisions that will be adopted to control effects on heritage assets. The provisions include management measures to control damage to assets that will be retained within the area of temporary land take and the preparation of project wide principles, standards and techniques for works affecting heritage assets. The CoCP also clarifies that, where required, a programme of archaeological and built heritage investigation and recording will be undertaken prior to and/or during enabling and construction works affecting the assets. 5.6.7 Locally specific control measures will be provided in the Local Environment Management Plans (LEMPs) to the relevant local authority. The LEMPs will summarise known or potential heritage assets (both designated and non-designated), and any specific local control measures outlined. These measures will also be subject to third party consents, notably Heritage Agreements. The LEMPs will cross reference the location specific WSIs which will be produced separately. 6 Unexpected major discoveries of national significance 6.1.1 In the event of nationally significant remains not encompassed by the programme of heritage works being discovered during construction, mechanisms for delivering suitable mitigation will be identified and put in place following consultation with the DCMS, their Executive Agency English Heritage and the relevant local authority. 6.1.2 In such cases, the nominated undertaker will examine whether preservation is feasible within the limits of deviation of the project and other constraints. If preservation is not feasible, the nominated undertaker will allow a period commensurate with the construction timetable, but not less than 28 days, for heritage works to be undertaken on the site for preservation by record. This process will be undertaken in consultation with the DCMS, English Heritage and the relevant local authority. At the end of that period the nominated undertaker s work will be able to continue. 6.1.3 Where the Secretary of State for Transport is notified of a decision by the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, following advice from English Heritage and/or representations from a local authority, that remains investigated under these provisions are of exceptional national importance, s/he may after consulting the nominated undertaker extend the period available for heritage investigation, or require the nominated undertaker to take steps such as are feasible in engineering terms, to preserve the remains in situ. In those circumstances, the nominated undertaker shall comply with the Secretary of State for Transport s decision. 6.1.4 The nominated undertaker will develop an Unexpected Discoveries of National Significance procedure setting out the mechanisms to be employed following such a discovery. 6

7 Disapplication of heritage legislation 7.1 Introduction 7.1.1 As part of the powers sought by the Bill, various legislative provisions in relation to heritage are disapplied in respect of specified construction activities to be carried out that affect designated heritage assets. 7.2 Listed buildings 7.2.1 Paragraph 1 of Schedule 18 of the Bill disapplies controls under the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 in relation to listed buildings which are affected by HS2 works. It is proposed that a Heritage Agreement will be made with each affected local authority and with English Heritage, in respect of those works which would usually be of a type that would normally require listed building consent. These agreements will cover the specific arrangements for each of the listed buildings set out in Table 1 of Schedule 18 to the Bill. These Heritage Agreements will ensure that appropriate mitigation measures are in place. 7.2.2 The nominated undertaker will liaise with the local authority and English Heritage during the preparation of the methodology for the works. 7.2.3 Paragraph 2 of Schedule 18 of the Bill disapplies controls under the Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas Act 1990 in relation to listed buildings which may require monitoring or protective works. 7.3 Scheduled monuments 7.3.1 Paragraph 1 of Schedule 19 of the Bill disapplies controls under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Areas Act 1979 in relation to scheduled monuments which are affected by HS2 works. 7.3.2 It is proposed that a Heritage Agreement will be made with English Heritage and this agreement will cover the site specific arrangements for scheduled monuments in respect of the HS2 works and which would usually be of a type that would normally require scheduled monument consent. This agreement will ensure that appropriate mitigation and safeguarding measures are in place. 7.3.3 The nominated undertaker will liaise with English Heritage during the preparation of the methodology for the works. 8 Disapplication of human remains and burial monuments legislation 8.1.1 Burial grounds have been avoided as far as practicable during the development of the scheme design. Where avoidance has not been practicable, every attempt will be made to limit the impact on burials grounds during the development of the detailed scheme design. 7

8.1.2 Where the construction of the Proposed Scheme will have a direct physical impact on human remains and burial monuments, notably burial grounds, the Bill will disapply the various legislative provisions to enable specified construction activities to be carried out. A project specific regime will be out in place to implement the terms of the Bill. 8.1.3 All human remains affected by HS2 works will be afforded due dignity, care and respect. 8.1.4 The nominated undertaker will develop a Human Remains and Burial Monuments Procedure to implement the legal requirements of the Bill. 8.1.5 A distinction is made between human remains buried over 100 years ago and those that are buried more recently. Where burial has occurred over 100 years ago consideration will be given to the need for, and extent of, archaeological investigation. The extent of any archaeological investigation will be determined in consultation with English Heritage, the relevant local authority and the Church Commissioners (Church of England). 8