Scottish Natural Heritage. Better places for people and nature

Similar documents
The Charter of European Planning BARCELONA 2013

Western City District What we heard

Scotland s Landscape Charter

Green Networks in Planning Policy and Management

Local Development Plan for Glasgow

PLACE WORKSHOP REPORT. A+DS SNH sustainable placemaking programme

Newcastle upon Tyne. Ub Urban development perspectives: Innovative strategies for sustainable planning

Taking forward the All London Green Grid

POLICY BRIEFING The Natural Choice: Securing the Value of Nature - Government White Paper on the environment

Welcome. /The Design Companion 4. /Planning London 7. /Getting Homes Built 8. /Transport & Streets 10. /Tech & The City 12

LITTLE FRANCE PARK, EDINBURGH

response sent to: Dear Sir/Madam Response to: The Review of Designated Landscapes in Wales Stage 2

Scotland s 2020 Biodiversity Challenge: Loch Lomond & The Trossachs National Park Authority Delivery Agreement

North District What we heard

Scottish Natural Heritage Parks and reserves places managed for people and nature

Design & Practical Application

Response to Review Panel Stage 2 Consultation on Designated Landscapes in Wales. UK Environmental Law Association s Wales Working Party

Perth and Kinross Council Development Management Committee 8 June Pre-Application Report by Development Quality Manager

Richard Lemon Spatial Project Manager. Biodiversity and Green Infrastructure

Place Brief. National Collections Facility (NCF site)

Policy and Resources Committee 10 th October Green Infrastructure Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) Summary. Title

WELCOME TO THE CHOUTEAU GREENWAY DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION WORKING GROUP!

LANDSCAPE INSTITUTE CORPORATE STRATEGY ISSUED 3RD APRIL Landscape Institute 107 Grays Inn Road London WC1X 8TZ United Kingdom

South Worcestershire Development Plan. South Worcestershire Design Guide Supplementary Planning Document

building with nature - a new benchmark for green infrastructure

BRE Strategic Ecological Framework LI Technical Information Note 03/2016

Central City District What we heard

NZIS Urban Design Strategy. September 2012

Living Cities Workshop Wednesday February 10th, 2016 Parliament House, Canberra

A DRAFT ALLOTMENT POLICY FOR STIRLING COUNCIL

Planning Policy Wales (PPW) Draft Edition 10

Valuing Historic Places

ENGLISH HERITAGE STRATEGY MAKING THE PAST PART OF OUR FUTURE

Scotland s Third National Planning Framework Scottish Planning Policy. from policy to delivery.

Planning Policy Wales. Edition 10 December 2018

Highland Council Allotment Policy

nature.scot CONNECTING PEOPLE AND NATURE Corporate Plan Onward

South District What we heard

Improving food security through local food systems

Darlington Healthy New Town Hilary Hall Project Manager, HNT

SOUTH AFRICA S PREPARATIONS FOR HABITAT III COMMON AFRICAN POSITION FOR HABITAT III. Habitat III Urban Breakfast 5 October 2016

Natural Environment White Paper & new partnerships to deliver green infrastructure. Henry Smith, Project and Policy Assistant, TCPA

Green Infrastructure, Natural England and the NW. Martin Moss, Green Infrastructure Delivery Leader, NW Regional Advocacy and Partnerships Team.

Heritage Action Zone. Explanatory Notes and Guidance

Historic Environment Scotland

Edinburgh Living Landscape Executive Summary of the Programme Plan

Neighbourhood Planning Local Green Spaces

HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT SCOTLAND

1.3 The following table presents a Statement of Compliance demonstrating how the Standish Neighbourhood Plan meets those requirements.

World Towns Agreement

Managing our Landscapes Conversations for Change

AUCKLAND DESIGN OFFICE. Terms of Reference: Auckland Urban Design Panel

Building with nature

elbridge Core Strategy

Elderberry Walk. Developer HAB Housing

Ipswich Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review, August 2017, Public Consultation

Rochford District Council Allocations Development Plan Document: Discussion and Consultation Document Sustainability Appraisal

AUCKLAND DESIGN OFFICE. Terms of Reference: Auckland Urban Design Panel 2017

Vancouver. Title of the Initiative. Initiative Duration. Submitted by. Comments by the Jury

Development of green infrastructure in EU regions Nature-based solutions delivering multiple benefits

Scottish Natural Heritage Sharing Good Practice Programme

The Hadean-Creation studio.

CITY CENTRE REGENERATION STRATEGY AND INVESTMENT PLAN QUESTIONNAIRE

Cranfield University Masterplan

building activity into new devevelopment

The Art of Building a Garden City: New Communities for the C21st

HUMAN CITY PROJECT: PARTICIPATORY MEDIA, MAPPING & PLANNING, PORT HARCOURT, RIVERS STATE, NIGERIA

Enabling a resilient future: exploring the leadership and governance of urban design

The New Planning System 5 June 2015

Ebbsfleet Development Corporation Corporate Plan

Cotswolds AONB Landscape Strategy and Guidelines. June 2016

CITY VIEW OBJECTIVES

Published in March 2005 by the. Ministry for the Environment. PO Box , Wellington, New Zealand ISBN: X.

Great Easton Neighbourhood Plan Statement of Basic Conditions

Our collaborative vision for a. Wisbech Garden Town....a place of great expectations

Spatial and Economic Master Planning. Resilient, healthy and happy places to live, work and learn

DLR Open Space Strategy. Final Draft Report April 2010

Cannards Grave Road Shepton Mallet Design Workshop 1 st June2016

Our City Centre is a vibrant, creative and welcoming destination, with a modern business, cultural, shopping, leisure and residential offer

PRIORITIES FOR THE ENVIRONMENT

Parish of Repton NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Derry City & Strabane District Council

2 Vision. Master Plan

Topham Mall, Bentham, Pitt and Waymouth Street Place Plan

The Lincolnshire Master Gardener Programme

DRAFT GREATER SYDNEY REGION PLAN OBJECTIVES, STRATEGIES AND ACTIONS

COMMUNITY LED REGENERATION CURRENT & FUTURE INITIATIVES FRANK RALLINGS - UNIVERSITY OF BRIGHTON

Part I: Setting the Scene

Response to the London Bridge Area Vision and Site Allocations within the New Southwark Plan

Norwich (United Kingdom), 9-10 September 2004

Ireland 2040 Our Plan Press Release

25th November Final statement by the ministers in charge of urban development

Temple Quarter Enterprise Zone

The journey so far. The new masterplan for Dargavel Village

Writtle University College Policy & Principles for Sustainable Development

Guidelines for Planning Authorities and Part V of the Planning and Development Act 2000: December 2000

Study of the Economic Value of Northern

COMMUNITY GROWN FOOD IN WALES

PRESENTATION TO THE CROSS PARTY GROUP ON ARCHITECTURE AND THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT A MANIFESTO FOR THE BUILT EMVIRONMENT

LIVEABLE. A diverse and welcoming capital city with an enviable lifestyle and strong community. Liveable City of Adelaide Strategic Plan

Transcription:

Scottish Natural Heritage Better places for people and nature

Contents Summary... 3 SNH approach... 5 Place-making in policy and practice... 6 Developing the contribution of the natural heritage to place-making... 9 Our role and priorities...12 How will we know if we are successful?...15 Further information...16 2

Better places for people and nature Summary 1 Place-making has become an increasingly important part of the Scottish Government s ambition for achieving better and more sustainable places where people want to live and work, which promote better health and enable the transition to a low-carbon economy. It also features strongly in the report of the Christie Commission on the Future Delivery of Public Services, especially as a part of the preventative spend agenda. 2 For SNH, our main interest in placemaking is in the delivery and promotion of high quality environments for people and nature that incorporate well managed and accessible greenspace, paths and landscapes. Our main priorities, in partnership with others, are to: promote the contribution of the natural heritage to making better places - through research, good practice and advocacy engage positively with statutory planning processes and partners to help deliver better places in practice; and champion the role of better places in improving health and tackling social, economic and environmental disadvantage by linking our work on landscape, greenspace and paths more closely to this agenda Better places for people and nature 3

3 We aim to do this by: providing a natural heritage perspective on national planning policy, strategic development plans and other spatial plans and guidance; developing and sharing good practice for use in spatial plans, masterplans, design briefs and supplementary planning guidance; helping to develop capacity in others to address natural heritage issues in place-making including local authorities and developers developing thinking and practice on green networks and the delivery of open spaces which deliver multiple benefits for people and nature; and supporting and sharing good practice from natural heritage projects which contribute to better places at the community level 4 Through this statement and followup action, we will also champion and promote the role of the natural heritage in creating better places and the contribution that these assets make to the social, economic and environmental priorities of the Scottish Government. 4

SNH approach 1 Government policy aims to create attractive and well-designed sustainable places where people want to live and work, which promote better health and enable the transition to a low-carbon economy. Our nature and landscapes have a key contribution to make to this policy agenda. This statement sets out how SNH will help to realise this contribution though providing advice and supporting and sharing good practice. It applies to new and existing settlement across both urban and rural Scotland. 2 Our vision is for the natural heritage to play its full role in developing better places for people to live, work, play and learn in 1. This will require the development of well managed and accessible landscapes, greenspace and path networks as part of all our settlements and their setting. This green infrastructure should be planned and managed to deliver a range of benefits for people and nature and be guided by effective community engagement in its planning and realisation. 1 SNH (2001, updated 2009) Natural Heritage Futures: Settlements. (Accessed 8 June 2011) Better places for people and nature 5

Place-making in policy and practice 3 Place-making is a term that began to be used in the 1970s by architects and planners to describe the process of creating squares, plazas, parks, streets and waterfronts that will attract people because they are pleasurable or interesting. Today, it has become a much wider overarching idea, as well as a hands-on tool for improving a neighbourhood, city or a region. At the core of the concept is a focus on people s needs and the way the components of a place (such as buildings, transport infrastructure or greenspace) come together to meet them. 4 Place-making has become an increasingly important part of the Scottish Government s ambition for achieving better and more sustainable places 2. It is seen by Ministers as integral to the agenda to modernise the planning system and is being developed through a range of national projects including the Scottish Sustainable Communities Initiative, Good Places Better Health and the Central Scotland Green Network (CSGN). It also features strongly in the report of the Christie Commission on the Future Delivery of Public Services. 3 2 E.g. Scottish Government Designing Places (2001, updated 2010) and Designing Streets (2010) (Both accessed 8 June 2011) 3 Report on the Future Delivery of Public Services by the Commission chaired by Dr Campbell Christie. Published on 21 June 2011, Scottish Government 2011. 6

5 The current context and focus for action for it is provided by National Outcome 10 of the National Performance Framework. National Outcome 10 - We live in well-designed, sustainable places where we are able to access the amenities and services we need Well-designed, sustainable places, both urban and rural, support people's physical and mental wellbeing. They are places in which people want to live. They provide ease of access to the workplaces and services we need by locating these conveniently with high quality housing as part of a mixed community. Mixed communities, providing a range of services, housing types and people, promote interaction and integration - and create positive, diverse neighbourhoods. They are places designed around people, not cars, encouraging activity and social interaction by providing easy access to both amenities and green space. They improve safety by increasing the number of people who use local facilities and generating a real sense of community. And they are sustainable places - both environmentally (harnessing new technologies such as lower carbon buildings) and socially (providing a diverse mix of people and services which allows the community to flourish and grow). Scotland Performs, National Outcome 10. Better places for people and nature 7

6 The contribution of nature and landscapes must take account of the factors in this definition and involves: working with the grain of existing environmental, cultural and historic assets taking into account neighbourhoods and people s needs by working at a community scale of about 300-400m or a 5 minute walk 4 ; developing a better understanding how the components of a place come together rather than delivery of any specific element; increased awareness of both the physical and social fabric of places which can support strong communities, development and enterprise; and working collaboratively with a range of organisations rather than in isolation. 7 The key drivers of change that shape settlements are leadership and policy, markets, funding (including investment decisions), design, spatial planning and regulation, community confidence and empowerment. Local authorities and developers play a critical role in this process through the planning system, but improving the natural heritage in settlements to benefit both people and nature requires a collaborative approach involving other organisations in the public and private sector and communities. The National Performance Framework and Single Outcome Agreements provide the framework to work together in this way. 4 These distances thresholds allow for everyday contact with greenspace, without having to make any special effort or journey to do so see for example English Nature Research Report No. 153, Accessible Natural Greenspace in towns and cities a review of appropriate size and distance criteria (1995). 8

Developing the contribution of the natural heritage to place-making 8 There are a number of qualities inherent to successful places 5 e.g. Distinctive well-designed and attractive places which reflect local materials and traditions and are very much part of the wider landscape around them; Safe, pleasant and welcoming places and paths for people of all abilities and backgrounds to be able to rest, relax, exercise, socialise and to experience nature Easy to move around environments with safe and welcoming networks of streets and paths which encourage all people to be active and support active travel. Adaptable multi-functional places including community growing spaces for local food, water and energy supplies, providing aesthetic, spiritual, educational and recreational resources Resource efficient reduce the amount of resources used, including reducing material flows and environmental impacts on a life cycle basis National planning policy and advice is increasing the importance placed on nature and landscapes in delivering these qualities. It emphasises the need to plan and install this green (and blue) infrastructure early in the development of successful new places and in the retrofitting of existing places 6. 5 Designing Places and Designing Streets (Both accessed 8 June 2011) 6 See Scottish Government (2011) Designing Better Places in Scotland (Accessed 7 June 2011) and Scottish Government (2011) Green Infrastructure Design and Place-Making (Accesed 10 November 2011) Better places for people and nature 9

9 Enhancing the contribution of nature and landscapes to place-making can bring many benefits and can provide greater value for public money 7. Key outcomes sought include: local distinctiveness and a strong sense of place: attractive places that inspire people and provide a sense of history (or heritage/place/identity) and opportunities for learning, leisure, relaxation and escapism increased economic growth and investment: inward investment and job creation; land and property values; local economic regeneration; land regeneration; local management of assets for local food, water and energy supplies better health and well being: increasing life expectancy and reducing health inequality; improving levels of physical activity and active travel; improving physical and mental health and well-being; improving opportunities for healthy eating and local food growing; achieving noise abatement, shelter and screening within communities social and community cohesion; creating spaces for socialising, interaction and events, providing better opportunities for children to play, creating opportunities for community participation and volunteering. improved climate change adaptation: heat amelioration, reducing flood risk; improving water quality; sustainable urban drainage; improving air quality reduction of emissions of greenhouse gases: mainly as a potential source of local renewable energy; opportunities for all to walk, cycle, use a wheelchair or push a pram for low carbon travel on better connected streets and green networks regeneration of degraded areas: improving quality of place; improving environmental quality and appearance 7 BREEAM Communities for Scotland (Accessed 8 June 2011) 10

conserving wildlife and habitats: increasing habitat area, increasing populations of some protected species and where appropriate facilitating species movement to support resilient and functioning habitats rich in native species diversity 10 Many of these outcomes can only be realised if the contribution of natural heritage is developed together with wider social aspects of place-making, including community engagement, development and enterprise. Simply improving the quality of greenspace, for example, will not deliver all of the above benefits if local people and communities cannot access it easily and safely and are not actively involved in its design, planning, and management. Current research and best practice suggests greater focus should be on delivering multiple benefits through place-making processes and to do this communities need to be equipped with a wide range of skills and resources to help to create and manage these assets. Better places for people and nature 11

Our role and priorities 11 Our main roles are to promote the contribution that nature and landscapes can make to creating better places and to influence the work of others to ensure that nature is built into national and local action. We will do this though the provision of expert advice based on sound evidence on the natural heritage to national and local government, developers, communities and other relevant groups. Working closely with Architecture and Design Scotland, Historic Scotland and other parts of the Scottish Government, we will also look to build capacity in others to address natural heritage issues in place-making and to build links stronger between the cultural and natural heritage. 12 We can t get involved in every single project designed to create a better place, but we do comment on all development plans and we can make sure we input to pathfinder or pilot projects, so that any advice we give is well grounded in practical experience. We will prioritise our efforts on communities suffering social, economic and environmental degradation or disadvantage and where our contribution can make a real difference to improve people s lives. 13 In most cases, we are unlikely to be directly involved in the finer-scale aspects of place-making (for example on the specification of buildings and grey infrastructure), nor do we have the expertise in these areas. Nevertheless, we recognise that this finer-scale detail can be an important in determining the overall quality, design and sustainability of places. Where appropriate we will therefore work with others to ensure that these connections are considered carefully in place-making. 12

14 We will also be flexible in our approach to place-making. Agreeing a fixed definition, vision or approach is likely to be contested at least partly because places do not, and should not, follow a one-size-fits-all mould. Individual preferences, context, driving forces and needs are all different within and between different parts of urban and rural Scotland. We will learn-by-doing with other organisations and local communities to help to make sure that places reflect local situations, contexts and priorities. 15 Our main priorities, in partnership with others, are to: promote the contribution of the natural heritage to making better places - through research, good practice and advocacy engage positively with statutory planning processes and partners to help deliver better places in practice; and champion the role of better places in improving health and tackling social, economic and environmental disadvantage by linking our work on landscape, greenspace and paths more closely to this agenda Better places for people and nature 16 We aim to do this by: providing a natural heritage perspective on national planning policy, strategic development plans and other spatial plans and guidance; developing and sharing good practice for use in spatial plans, masterplans, design briefs and supplementary planning guidance; helping to develop capacity in others to address natural heritage issues in place-making including local authorities and developers developing thinking and practice on green networks and the delivery of open spaces which deliver multiple benefits for people and nature; and supporting and sharing good practice from natural heritage projects which contribute to better places at the community level 13

SNH statements on paths and places managed for people and nature 8 and also the role of the natural heritage in improving health and wellbeing 9 are also directly relevant and related action on these topics will support our work on place-making. 17 The main focus for our activity on place-making will be through our statutory engagement with the planning system and with our work in the Central Scotland Green Network (CSGN), a national project identified in the National Planning Framework. More generally, we will also better align our activities to what local authorities and others are doing through Single Outcome Agreements and where possible through national initiatives such as the National Ecological Network, the Scottish Sustainable Communities Initiative and Climate Challenge Fund projects. The approach set out here will also inform our work with Scotland s two National parks. 18 Through this statement and followup action, we will also champion and promote the role of the natural heritage in creating better places and the contribution that these assets make to the social, economic and environmental priorities of the Scottish Government. 8 For further details see SNH (2010) Paths Linking people, places and nature and SNH (2011) Parks and Reserves - places managed for people and nature (2011) 9 SNH (2009) Developing the contribution of the natural heritage to a healthier Scotland (Accessed 28 June 2011) 14

How will we know if we are successful? 19 Existing measures such as BREEAM Communities Scotland 10 when used well can cover the ways in which the natural heritage contributes to place-making and help to create better places. For SNH, some key measures of success in implementing this statement will be as follows. Increased integration of environment and greenspace objectives into all related national priority areas and related policy/ strategy e.g. health The number of spatial planning and supplementary guidance documents we have been involved in that reflect a place-making approach Delivery of the CSGN, with significant improvements to the quality of place through greenspace, paths and landscapes across central Scotland. The development and use of measures of environmental quality for places, for example, Single Outcome Agreements and the Central Scotland Green Network Increased numbers of communities, local authorities, lands managers and developers that adopt Scotland s Landscape Charter The development of exemplar projects which demonstrate the multiple benefits for people and nature that can be derived from good place-making approaches Better delivery practice and improved awareness and use of local greenspace, path networks, and managed places by the public. 10 BREEAM Communities (accessed 8 June 2011) BREEAM Communities Scotland is expected to be launched in 2011 Better places for people and nature 15

Further information 20 We have produced a background & context paper which contains more information on place-making principles explored in this statement. A further paper containing illustrative examples has been developed to show what better places might look like at in practice at the various scales that place-making operates. This paper also includes a list of more detailed guidance and resources. Scottish Natural Heritage 2012 ISBN: 978-1-85397-875-3 All images by beckyduncanphotographyltd/ SNH and Lorne Gill/SNH 16