Design Assessment Checklists for Ponds/ Wetlands

Similar documents
The checklist can be used for a single filter strip or groups of filter strips with the same characteristics.

Lead Local Flood Authority SuDS Policy Statement

4.6. Low Impact and Retentive Grading

CHECKLIST FOR PHASE II DRAINAGE REPORT

Green Roofs and Stormwater Management Virginia Stovin

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN: ERAND GARDENS X70

Acknowledgements. C768 SuDS Construction Guidance. Insert logos / names. Guidance on the construction of SuDS launch event 01/11/2017

Olympic Park, London. SuDS used. 1. Location. 2. Description. Case study

Forest Way School Coalville, Leicestershire

SUDS: Innovation or a Tried and Tested Practice?

Sewer Flooding Alleviation in the Counters Creek Catchment

Key elements : Filter Strips must be designed within parameters required by the Fort Wayne s Development Standards/Criteria Manual.

Maintenance of SuDS. Fact sheet May

Retrofitting SuDS. Virginia Stovin. Department of Civil and Structural Engineering Pennine Water Group University of Sheffield.

5. LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS

Manor Ponds, Sheffield

Hopwood Motorway Service Area, Worcestershire

DEALING WITH STORM WATER MANAGEMENT

SuDS The business case. Steve Wilson

4. CONCEPT PLAN DEVELOPMENT

Table 4.7.1: Swales Potential Application and Storm Water Regulation

SUSTAINABLE DRAINAGE AND LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR ROBINSWOOD PRIMARY SCHOOL

Green Streets and Water

Wetland Design Manual. A1: Vision, core outcomes and aspirational outcomes

Maximising the Ecological Benefits of Sustainable Drainage Systems

Sewer Flooding Alleviation in the Counters Creek Catchment

2.1.4 Roof Downspout Rain Gardens

South Worcestershire Development Plan. South Worcestershire Design Guide Supplementary Planning Document

Sustainable Drainage Systems

When planning stormwater management facilities, the following principles shall be applied where possible.

MANUAL OF DESIGN, INSTALLATION, AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLANS

Chapter 2 Roof Downspout Controls

Cambrian North Basin, Llanelli

Shelbyville, KY Stormwater Best Management Practices. Section 2 EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN

Post Construction BMPs

UTT/17/2075/FUL - (BERDEN) (Referred to Committee by Councillor Janice Loughlin. Reason: In the Public Interest)

Chapter 4 - Preparation of Stormwater Site Plans

Managing Fire Risk for New Rural Dwellings

Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems (SuDs)

VA DCR STORMWATER DESIGN SPECIFICATION NO. 11 WET SWALE. VERSION 2.0 January 1, 2013 SECTION 1: DESCRIPTION

Appendix I. Checklists

Draft Rhode Island Stormwater Design and Installation Standards Manual

WILLIAM STREET STORM SEWER OUTFALL. PUBLIC INFORMATION CENTRE March 23, 2017

Renfrew Close, London

Plumpton Neighbourhood Development Plan Revised Pre Submission Document - Regulation 14 Consultation

STORMWATER GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE AND PLANNING/ZONING BOARDS

Opportunistic approaches to incorporating multi-functioning SuDS into housing redevelopments

Chapter 14. Stormwater Quality Introduction

Huntington Stormwater Utility

Introduction to Low Impact Development. Fred Milch. East Central Florida Regional Planning Council

Actions for local government

Hydrologic Assessment of using Low Impact Development to Mitigate the Impacts of Climate Change. Chris Jensen, AScT Master of Science Thesis

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY REGULATORY IMPEDIMENT GAP ANALYSIS TOOL

Guidance on Preparation of Construction and Maintenance Costs

Rainwater Management an issue for the 21 st Century. Hydrological Cycle

The Development of Urban Planning and Landscaping for Sustainable Drainage Systems

WQ-07 INFILTRATION TRENCH

APPENDIX A SIMPLIFIED APPROACH TO STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FOR SMALL PROJECTS. In West Sadsbury Township, Chester County, Pennsylvania

Priors Farm Estate SuDS Retrofitting Project, Cheltenham

Hollickwood Primary School, London

EVALUATION OF MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVES

Outfall Retrofit Feasibility Study

Sustainable Drainage. Design & Evaluation Guide

Uniclass L534:L217. November paving. permeable. for amenity CASE STUDY ROBERT BRAY ASSOCIATES SUDS PROJECTS.

Taking control of SuDS - with permeable paving

What now for home building?

10,000 Rain Gardens Project

2008 SWMM, 2010 Revision City of Tacoma

Clandeboye Primary School Raingarden, Bangor

SITE PLAN REVIEW ITEMS - REFERENCE CHECKLIST

TOWNSHIP OF LOGAN SOIL & FILL IMPORTATION AND PLACEMENT APPLICATION SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST

IMPLEMENTING STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR DEVELOPMENT

Introductory Briefing: Transport

SECTION 6. Routine Maintenance Activity Details

DRAFT DESIGN CRITERIA STORMWATER TREATMENT STANDARDS CITY OF OVERLAND PARK

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES/STORMWATER PONDS - What Are They?


Development of LID Design Guide in Edmonton

statement of environmental effects

WOKING DESIGN SUPPLEMENTARY PLANNING DOCUMENT (SPD)

LANDMARK HOUSE SUDS NOT DUDS Image Credit: RSH

Case Study. Erosion Control, Erosamat Type 3. Allermoor Spillway protection, Somerset. Key Project Information. Erosamat Type 3/20Z500M.

Pennsylvania Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual

Geosynthetics for Erosion Control and Reinforcement

Pollutant Removal Benefits

Policy DM19: Development and Nature Conservation

USF System Campus Master Plan Updates Goals, Objectives and Policies

Statement of Community Involvement LAND OFF SOUTHDOWN ROAD HORNDEAN, HAMPSHIRE

eastsussex.gov.uk Guide to Sustainable Drainage Systems in East Sussex

Severn River Sub-Watershed: BMP 09-Retrofit

Neighbourhood Planning Site Assessment Pro-forma and Guide Version 2

PLANNING AND DESIGN OF PUTRAJAYA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:

ESSEX COUNTY COUNCIL. Reason: To comply with section 91 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended).

STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN APPLICATION Manheim Borough

Beyond Runoff Reduction: Thorough Green Infrastructure Design. Zach Sample, PE Innovyze

The New Role for Councils: Driving an integrated green-blue approach. Celeste Morgan E2Designlab

An Introduction to Sustainable Drainage

POLICY SRT/D4 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

A. Regional Detention Requirements

Transcription:

Objectives This checklist can be used by the organisation approving the drainage scheme (drainage approving body) to help assess submissions for drainage approval. This checklist is aimed at providing a consistent assessment process and ensuring that designs meet the key design requirements set out in the SuDS Manual (CIRIA C697). The design guidance in the Manual provides details that support the implementation of this checklist so that designs and compliance assessment can be delivered effectively. Appropriate page references are provided in the checklist. This checklist should form part of a suite of documents required for a submission for drainage approval, including (but not limited to): A Scheme Design Assessment; Detailed Infiltration Assessment (where infiltration components are proposed); A Scheme Health and Safety Risk Assessment (if required); A Scheme Construction Method Statement; A Scheme Maintenance Plan. It can be used as a checklist by organisations responsible for the approval and adoption of SuDS to support their assessment of schemes, or it can be used as part of the required submissions from the developer. It can also help designers ensure that they have provided all relevant information to the drainage approving body in their submissions for approval. The checklist allows simple designs to be assessed against the Deemed to comply requirements in Table 1. Deemed to comply requirements (DtCR) are a set of standard design principles that avoid the need for complicated design calculations, modelling or other justification. The requirements are taken from the SuDS Manual. If the design varies from the Deemed to comply requirements, the variations should be explained and justified at the appropriate points in the checklist with a reference to supporting evidence. The checklist can be used for a single pond/wetlands or groups of similar features with the same characteristics. 1

Table 1 Deemed to Comply Requirements: Ponds / Wetlands Parameter Deemed to comply requirements Pond Wetland Length to width ratio Between 3:1 and 5:1 >3:1 Maximum depth of permanent water 2m 2m Maximum side slopes 1 in 3 (ideally at least 1 in 4 for habitat) 1 in 3 (ideally at least 1 in 4 for habitat) Width of aquatic bench >1m >1m Slope of aquatic bench 1 in 15 1 in 15 Maximum depth of aquatic bench 450mm 450mm Width of safety bench >3.5m >3.5m Slope of safety bench Less than 1 in 15 Less than 1 in 15 Maximum rise in water level for 1 in 100 year event Wetland mosaic water depths/areas 1.5m 1.5m N/A Maximum 20% of water area >1m 30% if water area between 0.5m and 1m 50% of water area between 0m and 0.5m For the 1 year, 30 min event meet the following requirement: Size of permanent pool = treatment volume, V t = treatment volume, V t Maximum water velocity N/A <0.1m/s Table 2 Design Assessment Checklist: Pond / Wetland GENERAL INFORMATION Site ID Asset ID(s) Pond/wetland location(s) and co-ordinates Date of assessment Primary function(s) of pond/wetland Attenuation / Treatment Drawing Reference(s) Specification Reference(s) DIMENSIONS Length (m) Maximum and minimum width at 2

permanent water level (m) Length:maximum width ratio Top surface area (m 2 ) Side slopes (1 in?) Depth of permanent water maximum and minimum (m) Freeboard (m) Aquatic bench width and slope (m, 1 in?) Safety bench width and slope (m, 1 in?) INFLOWS Provide a description of the contributing catchment land use and its size (m 2 ). Does the design include suitable silt interception upstream of system? Does the design include: A suitable inlet design? Appropriate energy dissipation? OUTFALL ARRANGEMENTS Provide details of any flow control systems, overflow arrangements and limiting discharge rate from pond/wetland Is a geomembrane required to prevent infiltration? If yes, give reason. Depth to maximum likely groundwater level (m) STORAGE Design event return period (s) (years) Maximum rise in water level (s) for the design event (s) (mm) Maximum water depth(s) at design event conditions (m) Maximum design storage volume (s) (m 3 ) Levels around the edge of the pond/wetland appropriate to contain design depths of 3

water? WATER QUALITY TREATMENT For the 1 year, 30 min event confirm: Permanent pool volume is sufficient for effective treatment Or Flow velocity is acceptable for effective treatment LANDSCAPE/BIODIVERSITY Is there sufficient treatment upstream of the pond to allow design amenity and biodiversity objectives to be delivered? Does the variation in permanent water depth have the potential to create bio diverse habitats? Does the design of the pond fulfil objectives of availability of different habitats including: deep water marginal dry/damp other A planting schedule is provided, showing species and planting preferences. Is the planting demonstrated appropriate for the habitat specified? Will plantings be established or rely on natural colonisation? Have locally appropriate native plant species been used? Indicate the number of different plant species used (not a mono-culture). Is the proposed pond/wetland planting appropriate to the location, and with respect to access and maintenance? Where relevant, confirm planting design 4

does not adversely impact highway visibility and safety requirements (check with highway authority). Is the proposed top soil profile suitable to sustain the proposed plant species? CRITICAL MATERIALS/ PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS Geomembrane Geotextile (non-woven) Topsoil Other (including proprietary systems) CONSTRUCTABILITY Are there any identifiable construction risks? If yes, state and confirm acceptable risk management measures are proposed. MAINTAINABILITY Confirm that access for maintenance is acceptable and summarise details. Are there specific features that are likely to pose maintenance difficulties? If yes, identify mitigation measures required. POND/WETLAND DESIGN ACCEPTABILITY Summary details including any changes required Date changes made : Minor changes required: Major changes required / re-design: Note: Input range if applied to > 1 system. If there is a DtCR (as indicated) confirm whether or not this is met and provide details of any variations. 5