TIMELY INFORMATION. Agriculture & Natural Resources DISEASE RESISTANCE AND SURVIVAL OF FLOWERING AND HYBRID DOGWOODS AT TWO LOCATIONS IN ALABAMA

Similar documents
Plant Pathology and Nematology

Influence of Nitrogen Fertilization Rate on Disease Incidence, Flower Bud Set, and Growth of Flowering Dogwood in Alabama

COMPARISON OF FUNGICIDES

TIMELY INFORMATION Agriculture & Natural Resources

HRI s Mission: Copyright, All Rights Reserved

'UF Multi-flora Peach' and 'UF Multi-flora Pink Frost' Gerberas - University of Florida Cultivars for Landscapes and Large Pots 1

Dogwood Information Chart

Dogwood Anthracnose. Purdue e-pubs. Purdue University. Paul C. Pecknold Purdue University,

Hawaii Agriculture Research Center -1- Vegetable Report 2. Hawaii Agriculture Research Center Vegetable Report 2 January 2000

Evaluation of new low- and moderate-chill peach cultivars in coastal southern California

Cercospora Leaf Spot and Growth of Crapemyrtle as Influenced by Nitrogen Rate

Potassium Applications and Yellow Shoulder Disorder of Tomatoes in High Tunnels

IPM Series: Dogwood HG 12 (rev. 2011)

New Arkansas Blackberry Production Characteristics

Soybean plant health: Foliar fungicide and insecticide effects on soybean disease suppression, senescence and yield I.

Strawberry Star Caladium A Spotted, Fancy-Leaved Variety for Use in Containers and Landscapes 1

2016 World Crops Research Update - Okra and Eggplant

Plant Disease Corner, April: Fire blight, Pine tree blights, and Leaf spots Jen Olson, Plant Disease Diagnostician

2003 NTEP Bentgrass Putting Green Cultivar Evaluation Performance Data, Cale A. Bigelow and Glenn A. Hardebeck

Vegetable Report 1 from Experiment Station, HARC December 1998

Master Gardener Recommended Horticulture Best Management Practices

Potential Disease Issues in Young Apple Nurseries. Sara M. Villani February 24, 2016 Department of Plant Pathology North Carolina State University

Research Progress Report Southern Region Small Fruit Consortium

CONTENTS. First Printing 1M, January Auburn University is an equal opportunity educational institution/employer.

Fungicide Efficacy and Spore Dispersal of Cercosporidium Needle Blight on Leyland Cypress

Pumpkin Cultivar Performance Trial Grown in Southern Ohio 2018

Dogwood Anthracnose. Dr. Fulya Baysal-Gurel, Md Niamul Kabir and Angelo Randaci

Performance of Tomato Lines and Hybrids Combining Resistance to Septoria Leaf Spot and Late Blight and Tolerance to Early Blight

Grafting of Tomatoes for Soil-based Production in Greenhouse and High Tunnels Judson Reid, Kathryn Klotzbach and Nelson Hoover

Southern Belle and Cherokee Red Clover in Florida 1

Controlled Release Container Nursery Fertilizer Evaluations. Dr. James T. Midcap

PHYTOPHTHORA ROOT AND RUNNER ROT OF CRANBERRY IN WISCONSIN- THE CURRENT SITUATION

Kathy Zuzek

Golf Session 1Papers MATERIALS AND METHODS

Evaluation of Grafted and Non-Grafted Hybrid and Heirloom Tomatoes in a High Tunnel

Maintaining a Healthy Lawn

Performance of Apple and Pear Cultivars in Northern Mississippi,

Plant Pathology Fact Sheet

Open-Field Soilless Culture of Vegetables 1

GROWTH AND PERFORMANCE OF OWN-ROOTED CHANDLER AND VINA COMPARED TO PARADOX ROOTED TREES

Response of Cymbidium Pine Clash Moon Venus to major nutrient at vegetative growth stage

Effect of Nitrogen and Potassium on Growth and Development of Curcuma alismatifolia Gagnep.

Propagation. Pests and Diseases. Florida wax scale

Guidelines for Managing Onion Thrips on Onion

4. E7 Plant Diseases and Disorders

PEANUT PROGRESS. In this issue. Current Peanut Situation. Volume 6, Issue 4. Jason Woodward, Extension Plant Pathologist- State Peanut Specialist

LONGIFLORUM THUNB. ('GEORGIA')2

Variety selection is important to minimize disease incidence and severity

CHASE NEWS. Bacterial Diseases to Watch For and Avoid. Volume 7 Issue 3 CHASE HORTICULTURAL RESEARCH, INC. Inside this issue: March 2008

Integration of Tree Spacing, Pruning and Rootstock Selection for Efficient Almond Production

'Garden White' Caladium - a University of Florida Cultivar for Sunny Landscapes and Large Containers 1

DISEASE MANAGEMENT FOR COMMERCIAL VEGETABLES KNOWLEDGE! PRE-PLANT DECISIONS THOMAS ISAKEIT HORTICULTURE 325 ESSENTIAL MANAGEMENT TOOL:

dogwoods A dogged approach to Years of research have yielded hardier, more decorative Cornus hybrids

The Sun-Blotch Disease of Avocado

First Identify the Problem. What's Bugging You? Integrated Pest Management (IPM) 11/14/2018. Jim Jacobi Extension Plant Pathologist

3. M9 NIC29 A virus-free Belgian subclone of M9 that is slightly more vigorous than most others M9 clones.

High Tunnel Primocane Fruiting Blackberry Production in Cold Region of Midwest*

Wear Tolerant Grasses for Use on Sports Fields in a Cold Climate M.A. Anderson and J.B. Ross

Selecting Burley Tobacco Varieties

Steven R. James and Gary L. Reed

1995 RUTGERS Turfgrass Proceedings

Healthy Garden Tips Web site: Telephone: University of California Cooperative Extension Napa County

EFFECTS OF AMMONIUM LIGNOSULFONATE ON SOIL MICROBIAL POPULATIONS, VERTICILLIUM WILT, AND POTATO SCAB.

Optimizing Peach Disease Management

Foliar fungicide timing and interaction with soybean maturities: Effect on soybean disease suppression and yield

Temperature and Dose influence Phoma macrostoma efficacy on seedling broadleaf weeds.

Apple Rootstock Trials in British Columbia, Canada

B /02. Lawn WATER MANAGEMENT

Igor Laćan Urban Forestry Advisor

Induced Resistance in Plants: Improving Turf Disease Control with Products that Enhance the Plant s Natural Defenses

1. E8 Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Action Plan

Lettuce with Vitazyme application Vitazyme Field Tests for 2018

INTRODUCTION TO PRUNING

Diseases of Pansies and Their Control

WHAT S UP WITH THE WEATHER THESE DAYS?

Vineyard Disease Management for Cold Climate Grapes ANN HAZELRIGG UVM EXTENSION NY/VT GRAPE SCHOOL LAKE GEORGE, NY MARCH 9, 2017

UVM Hops Program. Dr. Heather Darby University of Vermont Extension

Vermont Growers Winter Meeting February 21 st, 2015

Fruit Pests BOTRYTIS (GREY MOLD) Botrytis (Gray Mould) Alberta Farm Fresh Local Food Short Course 2012 Red Deer, AB. Attacks various plant parts

Effect of Method of Application of Double Superphosphate on the Yield and Phosphorus Uptake by Sugar Beets 1

Strawberry plug plant production

Considerations for Diagnosis of Ornamentals in the Landscape

New Planting. A&L Canada Laboratories Small Fruit News Letter Vol. 3 April 17, application should be at a 90 o direction to the row direction.

Olive Disease Management Fact Sheet

Master Gardener 2/2/2014. Plant Disease Diagnosis. Basic Plant Pathology and Diseases of Ornamentals

Propagation. Pests and Diseases. Black twig borer (Xylosandrus compactus) Magnolia white scale (Pseudaulacaspis cockerelli)

Anthracnose of Strawberry. Production Guideline. In This Issue

Some Crossing Experiments with Sugar Beets

Limiting Losses from Other Tuber Rots

Your Florida Dooryard Citrus Guide - Young Tree Care 1

Effects of Planting Dates and Varieties on Growth and Yield of Broccoli During Rainy Season

Grass Species and Fertilization Practices to Minimize Negative Effects of Lawns. Dr. Rebecca Brown University of Rhode Island

USDA Sanitary Phytosanitary Project

Propagation. Pests and Diseases. Crape myrtle aphid

satg WATERMELON CULTIVATION DISEASES PESTS

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Research Report Cover Sheet

Growing Raspberries in Southern Wisconsin. Lisa Johnson, Dane County UWEX

XERISCAPE The conservation of water and energy through creative landscape.

Wear Tolerant Grasses for Use on Sports Fields in a Cold Climate M.A. Anderson and J.B. Ross

STALK ROTS. When to look for: Mid-August to Early October

Transcription:

PLANT PATHOLOGY SERIES TIMELY INFORMATION Agriculture & Natural Resources August 1, 2008 PP-654 DISEASE RESISTANCE AND SURVIVAL OF FLOWERING AND HYBRID DOGWOODS AT TWO LOCATIONS IN ALABAMA Introduction A. K. Hagan, J. R. Akridge, and R. Dawkins Flowering dogwood (Cornus florida) is among the most popular small flowering trees in southern landscapes. Spot anthracnose, powdery mildew, and Cercospora leaf spot often have a detrimental impact on the aesthetics and occasionally the health of flowering dogwood. While fungicides give some protection from the above diseases (2), establishment of resistant cultivars is the preferred method of managing the above diseases. Previous studies (4,5,7) have focused on the reaction of flowering dogwood cultivars to spot anthracnose and/or powdery mildew but not Cercospora leaf spot. Differences in the rate of Cercospora leaf spot development has be seen in a landscape planting of native flowering dogwood (Hagan, personal observation). The Stellar dogwood (C. kousa x florida) series were released in the early 1990 s. In North Carolina, Ranney et al (6) noted that the Stellar dogwoods Stellar Pink and Celestial were highly resistant to dogwood anthracnose, while Constellation, Aurora, and Ruth Ellen were intermediate in their reaction to that disease. In addition, Stellar Pink, Celestial, and Aurora but not Ruth Ellen and Constellation had a high level of resistance to powdery mildew (6). Among the Stellar dogwoods, Ruth Ellen proved most susceptible to E. pulchra-incited powdery mildew (5). In an Alabama study, the Stellar dogwood cultivars showed good resistance to spot anthracnose and powdery mildew but their survival rate was far below that of the flowering dogwood cultivars (4). In this study, the reaction of selected cultivars of flowering and Stellar dogwood to spot anthracnose, powdery mildew, and Cercospora leaf spot, as well as their adaptability was assessed at locations in South and North Alabama. Material and Methods In February 2004, cultivars of flowering dogwood (Cornus florida) and Stellar dogwood (Cornus kousa x florida) were planted in full sun at the Sand Mountain Research and Extension Center [SMREC] in Northeast Alabama and at the Brewton Agricultural Research Unit [BARU] in Southwest Alabama. The newly released C. florida cultivar Appalachian Spring was included in the BARU but not SMREC study. Otherwise, the cultivar list for both locations was identical. Immediately after planting, the trees were mulched with aged pine bark and a drip irrigation system was installed. Ammonium nitrate was applied to the mulched area around each tree at a rate of 150 pounds of actual nitrogen per treated acre per year. Supplemental applications of murate of potash at 60 pounds per acre were made as needed. Surflan AS alone or in a tank mixture with Gallery was applied for pre-emergent weed control. Escape weeds were controlled either by hand or with spot applications of Finale or MSMA. The experimental design ALABAMA A&M AND AUBURN UNIVERSITIES, AND TUSKEGEE UNIVERSITY, COUNTY GOVERNING BODIES AND USDA COOPERATING The Alabama Cooperative Extension System offers educational programs, materials, and equal opportunity employment to all people without regard to race, color, national origin, religion, sex, age, veteran status, or disability.

was a randomized complete block with four replications with two plants per replicate at BARU and five single plant replications at SMREC. Spot anthracnose, powdery mildew, and Cercospora leaf spot intensity was assessed using the Horsfall and Barratt 1 to 12 rating scale where 1 = no disease, 2 = 0 to 3%, 3 = 3 to 6%, 4 = 6 to 12%, 5 = 12 to 25%, 6 = 25 to 50%, 7 = 50 to 75%, 8 = 75 to 87%, 9 = 87 to 94%, 10 = 94 to 97%, 11 = 97 to 100 %, and 12 = 100% of the leaves diseased or prematurely shed on the dates listed in the table. Cercospora leaf spot-induced defoliation was also assessed using the above rating scale. Trees at BARU were harvested on 31 September 2007 to assess insect damage to their trunks. Significance of treatment effects were tested by analysis of variance and Fisher s protected least significant difference (LDS) test (P=0.05). Results and Discussion SMREC Trial: In 2005, symptoms of spot anthracnose were first noted on 13 April as the leaves on unfurled. By 17 May, spot anthracnose ratings were higher for Cherokee Brave, Cherokee Princess, Cloud 9, and Rubra than for the Stellar dogwoods (Table 1). Cherokee Princes had a lower spot anthracnose rating compared with the other flowering dogwood cultivars. Little if any spot anthracnose damage was seen on leaves of the Stellar dogwoods. Powdery mildew incidence was higher on the flowering than the Stellar dogwoods. Nearly all of the leaves on the Rubra and Cherokee Princess flowering dogwood were colonized by the powdery mildew fungus Erysiphe pulchra. While Cherokee Brave and Cloud 9 had lower powdery mildew ratings than Rubra and Cherokee Princess, over 50% of the leaves on latter trees were also heavily colonized. In contrast, powdery mildew incidence on the Stellar dogwoods ranged from 0% to 8% and the area colonized on individual leaves was small. Cercospora leaf spot appeared on the flowering dogwoods between the 8 July and 29 August 2005 rating dates. By 29 August, heaviest defoliation was noted on the Cherokee Princess flowering dogwood. On Cherokee Princess and Cherokee Brave, defoliation exceeded 50% on 14 September compared with less than 6% on Stellar Pink, Ruth Ellen, Celestial, and Aurora on the same date. By 20 October, moderate to heavy defoliation was seen on all flowering and Stellar dogwoods except for Celestial and Stellar Pink. Heaviest defoliation was recorded on Cherokee Princess and Cherokee Brave. Defoliation levels for Ruth Ellen, Aurora, and Constellation were similar. As was noted in the previous year, spot anthracnose damage was higher in 2006 on the flowering than the Stellar dogwoods. Among the flowering dogwood cultivars, Cherokee Princess suffered the least spot anthracnose-related leaf spotting (Table 1). Spot anthracnose ratings for flowering dogwoods Cherokee Brave, Cloud 9, and Rubra were similar. Characteristic symptoms of spot anthracnose were found on no more than 3% of the leaves of any Stellar dogwood cultivar. Again, the Stellar dogwood cultivars had noticeably lower powdery mildew ratings than the flowering dogwood cultivars. While little if any leaf colonization of the Stellar dogwoods was noted on 6 June 2006 rating date, at least 90% of the leaves of Rubra flowering dogwood were colonized. While Cherokee Brave had the lowest powdery mildew ratings among the flowering dogwood cultivars, leaf colonization was higher compared with all Stellar dogwood cultivars. Due to heavy drought-related leaf scorch, Cercospora leaf spot development was minimal in 2006 on all trees. For 2007, spot anthracnose ratings for all of the Stellar dogwood cultivars except Celestial were lower than those of the heavily damaged flowering dogwood cultivar Cherokee Princess (Table 1). The low level of spot anthracnose damage on Cherokee Chief was similar to that on the Stellar hybrid dogwood cultivars Ruth Ellen, Constellation, and Aurora. For the third 2

Constellation, and Aurora. For the third consecutive year, powdery mildew incidence was noticeably higher on all of the flowering than the Stellar dogwood cultivars. Among the flowering dogwood cultivars, the level of leaf colonization was lower on Cherokee Brave than on Rubra, Cherokee Princess, and Cloud 9. For the second consecutive year, dry summer and early fall weather in 2007 suppressed the development of Cercospora leaf spot. By the 1 November rating date, symptoms of this disease were restricted to light to moderate leaf spotting with little if any premature defoliation. Cercospora leaf spot ratings were higher for Rubra flowering dogwood than the Stellar dogwoods Aurora, Celestial, and Stellar Pink. Among the flowering dogwood cultivars, disease intensity was lower on Cherokee Princess than Cloud 9 and Rubra but not Cherokee Brave. Overall, the leaf spot phase of spot anthracnose was less damaging in 2008 than in the previous three years (Table 1). Among the flowering dogwood cultivars, Cherokee Princess has the lowest spot anthracnose rating. As was noted on the above flowering dogwood cultivar, symptoms on all Stellar dogwood cultivars were limited to scattered leaf spots on a few leaves. Higher leaf colonization was again recorded on the flowering than Stellar dogwood cultivars. Powdery mildew development on all the Stellar cultivars was restricted to a scattered colony or two on no more than a few of the immature leaves. Among the flowering dogwood, powdery mildew incidence on Rubra and Cherokee Princess compared with Cherokee Brave and Cloud 9, which had similar disease ratings. BARU Trial: All Stellar dogwood cultivars had lower spot anthracnose ratings in 2005 than the flowering dogwood cultivars Cloud 9, Cherokee Princess, and Rubra (Table 2). Spot anthracnose ratings for the flowering dogwood cultivars Appalachian Spring and Cherokee Brave were similar to those of the Stellar dogwoods Ruth Ellen, Stellar Pink, Aurora, and Constellation but higher than those for Celestial. No differences in spot anthracnose ratings were noted among the five Stellar dogwood cultivars. Although considerable powdery mildew development was noted on the leaves of all of the flowering dogwood cultivars in 2005, minimal leaf colonization was seen on the Stellar dogwoods. Of the flowering dogwood cultivars, Rubra and Cherokee Brave had the highest and lowest, respectively, powdery mildew ratings. Powdery mildew incidence was higher on Cherokee Brave than all of the Stellar dogwoods. On 22 August, Cercospora leaf spot induced-defoliation was higher on Cherokee Princess than nearly all of the flowering and Stellar dogwoods. By 10 October, defoliation levels for the Stellar dogwood cultivars were significantly below those of all the flowering dogwood cultivars. As indicated by defoliation ratings of 6.8 and 9.3, respectively, Cherokee Brave suffered nearly 50% defoliation at the above rating date compared with almost 93% for Rubra. In contrast, the Stellar dogwoods Ruth Ellen, Constellation, and Stellar Pink, which had defoliation ratings ranging from 4.4 to 4.9, suffered only 8 to 12 % premature leaf loss. Defoliation ratings for Celestial and Aurora were below those of Stellar Pink and Constellation. By 11 November 2005, defoliation ratings for Stellar dogwoods Ruth Ellen, Stellar Pink, and Constellation were similar to those recorded for Appalachian Spring, Cloud 9, and Cherokee Princess flowering dogwoods. On the above rating date, Rubra flowering dogwood was almost completely defoliated. Among the Stellar dogwoods, Celestial and Aurora had the lowest Cercospora leaf spot defoliation ratings. Except for Cherokee Princess, spot anthracnose incidence on 8 May 2006 was significantly lower for the Stellar than for the flowering dogwood cultivars (Table 2). Among the flowering dogwood cultivars, spot anthracnose ratings for Appalachian Spring and Rubra were higher than Cherokee Princess but not Cloud 9 and Cherokee Brave. Similar spot anthracnose ratings were recorded for all Stellar dogwood cultivars. In 2006, noticeable 3

powdery mildew development was found only on Rubra flowering dogwood. Powdery mildew development was minimal on the remaining flowering dogwood cultivars and all the Stellar dogwood cultivars. Cercospora leaf spot development was not assessed in 2006 due to severe wounding of the leaves by hail. In 2007, incidence of the leaf spot phase of spot anthracnose did not differ among flowering dogwood cultivars (Table 2). Spot anthracnose incidence on the flowering dogwood cultivars Cherokee Princess and Cherokee Brave as well as the Stellar dogwood cultivars Ruth Ellen and Aurora were similar. Leaves of the Stellar dogwoods Stellar Pink, Celestial, and Constellation remained free or largely free of spot anthracnose symptoms. Due to hot, dry weather patterns, powdery mildew development was very limited on both flowering and Stellar dogwood cultivars. While the highest level of powdery mildew was noted on Rubra flowering dogwood, colonies of the causal fungus as indicated by a rating of 3.3 were found on approximately 4% of the leaves. Powdery mildew was not observed on the leaves of any of the Stellar dogwood cultivars. Cercospora leaf spot intensity did not significantly differ between flowering dogwood cultivars. Disease ratings for Ruth Ellen and Aurora were similar to those of the flowering dogwood cultivars. When compared with Cloud 9 flowering dogwood, survival of all Stellar dogwood cultivars was very poor over the three-year study period (Figure 1). Similarly poor survival pattern for Stellar dogwoods were seen in a previous Alabama field study (4). In contrast, the survival rate for the remaining four flowering dogwood cultivars was similar to the 100% level noted for Cloud 9 (data not shown). Trunk damage attributed to the Asian ambrosia beetle (Xylosandrus crassiusculus) was first noted in March 2006. When study was terminated in September 2007, Asian ambrosia beetle, dogwood borer (Synanthedon scitula), or a combination of these two insects had damaged approximately 75% of the trunks of each of the Stellar dogwood cultivars compared with 16% or fewer of the trunks of the flowering dogwood cultivars (data not shown). The involvement of the dogwood borer in the death of two trees at SMREC was not assessed. No tunneling or other damage attributed to the Asian ambrosia beetle has been noted at the SMREC site. As seen in previous field trial (4,5,6), Stellar dogwood cultivars demonstrated superior resistance to spot anthracnose and powdery mildew to most flowering dogwood cultivars at both study sites. Differences in the level of spot anthracnose and powdery mildew resistance between the Stellar dogwoods Aurora, Celestial, Constellation, Ruth Ellen, and Stellar Pink usually were minor. In addition, significantly less Cercospora leaf spot-induced premature defoliation and to a lesser extent leaf spotting was noted on the Stellar than the flowering dogwood cultivars. At the two study locations, the least premature defoliation was seen on Celestial and Aurora, while Ruth Ellen and Stellar Pink had equally low defoliation ratings at one study location. Enhanced leaf retention due to superior Cercospora leaf spot resistance of the Stellar dogwood cultivars usually resulted in superior fall color. Among the flowering dogwood cultivars, Rubra proved to be susceptible at both study locations to the leaf spot phase of spot anthracnose and powdery mildew. While spot anthracnose incidence was often lower on Cherokee Princess, particularly at SMREC, this cultivar proved highly susceptible to powdery mildew at the same location. Cherokee Brave and Cloud 9, which have some resistance to powdery mildew, were susceptible to spot anthracnose. The dogwood anthracnose-resistant Appalachian Spring flowering dogwood was as susceptible to spot 4

anthracnose as Rubra but showed some resistance to powdery mildew. When compared with most of the Stellar dogwood cultivars, flowering dogwood cultivars were more susceptible to Cercospora leaf spot. Differences in the reaction of flowering dogwood cultivars to Cercospora leaf spot, however, were noted. At both locations, Cloud 9 was less susceptible to Cercospora leaf spot than Rubra. When compared with Rubra, a reduction in premature defoliation was also noted at one of two sites for Cherokee Princess, Appalachian Spring, and to a lesser extent Cherokee Brave. Recently, development of Cercospora leaf spot was shown to be slightly slower on Cherokee Chief than Cloud 9 (3). Conner and Bowen (1) reported that the flowering dogwood cultivars Pygmy, Red Pygmy, and Pumpkin Patch were free of Cercospora leaf spot, while minor disease development was seen on Cherokee Brave, Cherokee Chief, Cherokee Princess, and Cloud 9. In summary, the Stellar dogwoods Aurora, Celestial, Constellation, Ruth Ellen, Stellar Pink demonstrated good to excellent resistance to common dogwood diseases. Of these, Celestial, which suffered little damage from spot anthracnose, powdery mildew, and Cercospora leaf spot, may have the best disease resistance package. Despite their high level of disease resistance, Stellar dogwoods have proven extremely vulnerable in South and Central Alabama (4) to the Asian ambrosia beetle, dogwood borer, and possibly winter injury. As a result, plantings of Stellar dogwoods should be limited to the northern third of Alabama. Among the flowering dogwood cultivars, Cherokee Brave proved most resistant to powdery mildew but was vulnerable to spot anthracnose and Cercospora leaf spot. Literature Cited 1. Conner, K. N. and K. L. Bowen. 2006. Flowering dogwood cultivar resistance to Cercospora leaf spot. Phytopathology 96:S26. (Abstr.). 2. Hagan, A. K. and J. R. Akridge. 2007. Synthetic and biorational fungicides compared for the control of three foliar diseases of flowering dogwood. J. Environ. Hort. 25(3):157-165. 3. Hagan, A. K., J. R. Akridge, and K. L. Bowen. 2008. Influence of nitrogen fertilization rate on disease incidence, flower bud set, and growth of flowering dogwood in Alabama. Alabama Agri. Exp. Sta. Bul. 671. 4. Hagan, A. K., B. Hardin, C. H. Gilliam, G. J. Keever, J. D. Williams, and J. Eakes. 1998. Susceptibility of cultivars of several dogwood taxa to powdery mildew and spot anthracnose. J. Environ. Hort. 16(3): 147-151. 5. Mmbaga, M. T. and R. J. Sauve. 2004. Multiple disease resistance in dogwoods (Cornus spp.) to foliar pathogens. J. Arboric. 30(2):101-107. 6. Ranney, T. G., L. F. Grand, and J. L. Knighten. 1995. Susceptibility of cultivars and hybrids of kousa dogwood to dogwood anthracnose and powdery mildew. J. Arboric. 21(1):11-16. 7. Windham, M. T., R. N. Trigiano, and A. S. Windham. 2005. Susceptibility of Cornus species to two general of powdery mildew. J. Environ. Hort. 23(4):190-192. 5

Figure 1. Survival of Stellar dogwood cultivars at the Brewton Agricultural Research Center from 2005 through 2007. 100 80 Tree Survival 60 40 20 0 Cloud 9 Constellation Aurora Ruth Ellen Stellar Pink Celestial 2005 2006 2007 Year 6

Table 1. Sensitivity of selected cultivars of flowering (C. florida) and Stellar (C. florida x kousa) dogwood to leaf spot phase of spot anthracnose, powdery mildew, and Cercospora leaf spot at SMREC in 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008. Spot Anthracnose z Powdery Mildew y Cercospora Leaf Spot x Dogwood Selection 2005 2006 2007 2008 2005 2006 2007 2008 2005 2007 Flowering dogwood Intensity Defoliation Intensity Rubra 4.2 ab w 6.2 a 5.8 ab 3.7 a 11.4 a 10.0 a 6.8 a 9.3 a 12.0 a 8.4 abc 4.0 a Cherokee Brave 4.0 ab 6.2 a 2.6 d 3.6 a 7.0 b 3.2 c 3.6 b 6.2 b 10.8 bc 9.0 a 3.0 abc Cloud 9 5.4 a 5.4 a 5.6 ab 3.0 ab 8.4 b 5.6 b 6.8 a 6.8 b 9.4 de 7.4 bc 3.4 ab Cherokee Princess 3.6 b 4.0 b 7.2 a 2.0 bc 10.8 a 8.3 a 7.3 a 9.0 a 11.4 ab 9.6 a 1.5 cd Stellar dogwood Ruth Ellen 1.4 c 2.0 c 3.0 cd 1.4 c 1.8 cd 1.2 d 1.2 c 1.6 c 11.2 ab 4.8 de 2.8 abcd Stellar Pink 1.6 c 1.4 c 4.8 bc 1.2 c 1.0 d 1.0 d 1.0 c 2.0 c 8.4 e 3.8 ef 1.6 cd Celestial 1.2 c 2.0 c 5.4 ab 1.4 c 2.4 cd 1.0 d 1.0 c 1.4 c 8.8 e 2.4 f 1.2 d Aurora 1.2 c 1.2 c 2.2 d 1.4 c 2.6 cd 1.2 d 1.2 c 1.4 c 10.0 cd 4.8 de 1.8 bcd Constellation 2.0 c 2.0 c 2.3 d 1.5 bc 3.2 c 1.0 d 1.3 c 1.8 c 8.8 e 6.6 cd 2.5 abcd z Spot anthracnose leaf ratings are reported for 17 May 2005, 5 May 2006, 19 April 2007, and 1 May 2008. y Powdery mildew incidence is reported for 8 July 2005, 7 June 2006, 1 June 2007, and 23 June 2008. x Cercospora leaf spot incidence is reported for 20 October 2005 and 12 October 2007. w Mean separation within columns was according to Fisher's protected least significant difference test (P=0.05). 7

Table 2. Susceptibility of selected flowering (C. florida) and Stellar (C. florida x kousa) dogwood cultivars to spot anthracnose, powdery mildew, and Cercospora leaf spot at BARU in 2005, 2006, and 2007. Spot Anthracnose z Powdery Mildew y Cercospora Leaf Spot x Dogwood Selection 2005 2006 2007 2005 2006 2007 2005 2007 Flowering dogwood Intensity Defoliation Intensity Appalachian Spring 5.0 ab w 4.5 a 6.7 a 6.8 c 1.2 b 1.2 b 10.8 ab 7.3 cd 4.7 ab Cherokee Brave 5.7 ab 4.3 ab 4.9 abc 4.7 d 1.0 b 1.4 b 11.1 ab 9.3 b 2.4 abcd Cloud 9 6.6 a 4.3 ab 6.3 ab 8.0 bc 1.1 b 1.8 ab 11.4 ab 8.1 cd 3.8 abcd Cherokee Princess 6.4 a 3.3 bc 5.0 abc 9.1 b 2.3 b 2.5 ab 11.5 a 8.3 bc 4.0 abc Rubra 6.5 a 4.9 a 5.9 ab 11.6 a 7.0 a 3.3 a 11.9 a 10.9 a 4.9 a Stellar dogwood Ruth Ellen 4.0 bc 1.9 d 3.0 cd 1.0 e 1.0 b 1.0 b 12.0 a 7.1 d 2.5 abcd Stellar Pink 4.1 bc 2.0 d 1.2 d 1.1 e 1.0 b 1.0 b 11.4 ab 7.8 cd 1.3 cd Celestial 2.5 c 2.1 cd 1.0 d 1.1 e 1.0 b 1.0 b 10.3 b 4.1 e 2.0 bcd Aurora 3.6 bc 2.5 cd 4.2 bc 1.0 e 1.0 b 1.0 b 11.6 a 4.8 e 1.0 d Constellation 4.3 bc 2.3 cd 1.0 d 1.0 e 1.0 b 1.0 b 11.1 ab 8.0 cd 1.0 d z Spot anthracnose leaf ratings are reported for 19 May 2005, 8 May 2006, and 2 May 2007. y Powdery mildew incidence is reported for 23 July 2005, 7 June 2006, and 3 July 2007. x Cercospora leaf spot ratings are reported for 18 October 2005 and August 31, 2007. w Mean separation within columns was according to Fisher's protected least significant difference test (P=0.05). 8