Parapet/Formliner/Fencing

Similar documents
Elgin O Hare Western Access Project Local Advisory Committee. February 10, 2014

FDOT D4 Complete Streets

West Dennis Center: Bass River to Old Main Street. West Dennis Business District: Old Main Street to Dennis Commons

The Illinois Department of Transportation and Lake County Division of Transportation. Route 173, including the Millburn Bypass

AGENDA ACTION ITEMS INFORMATION ITEMS

Harlem Avenue Corridor Plan: Corridor Planning Across Municipal Boundaries

I-70/71 Innerbelt Project

Elm Street Business District: Streetscape and Signage Plan

July 12, Columbus City Council City Hall 90 West Broad Street Columbus, OH RE: I-70/71 Columbus Crossroads Project

COMMUNICATION URBAN DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CITY OF DES MOINES, IOWA MAY 16, 2017 MEETING

Corridor Enhancements

BUSINESS DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES

Overall Map. Chicago. St. Louis. Summit. Joliet. Dwight. Pontiac. Bloomington-Normal Lincoln. Springfield. Carlinville. Alton EXPERIENCE IT YOURSELF.

I. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION... 1 A. General Description... 1 B. Historical Resume and Project Status... 2 C. Cost Estimates...

I-290 Eisenhower Expressway

Kankakee River Bridge & Track Improvements Supplemental Environmental Assessment. May 5, 2016

ROCKTON DOWNTOWN STREETSCAPE MASTER PLAN. Village Board Presentation May 8, 2018 Teska Associates Christopher Burke Engineering

The Village of Sugar Grove, in partnership with Kane County, the Illinois Department of Transportation, and the Illinois Tollway welcomes you to the

Mississippi Skyway Preliminary Engineering Report

PROJECT BACKGROUND. Preliminary Design Scope and Tasks

Executive Summary. NY 7 / NY 2 Corridor

3.0 master plan concept

WEST LOOP DESIGN GUIDELINES CHECKLIST

Route 1 Corridor Study

US 24 & SR 66 Interchange Modification and Corridor Improvement Project Public Involvement Meeting December 5, 2007

PIKE PINE RENAISSANCE: ACT ONE. October 19, 2017

Spring 2018 Construction Update

THREE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FY

Chapter 7: Streetscape & Design Elements

LOCATION AND DESIGN DIVISION

Pennsy Greenway Trail

FY STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM New Jersey Department of Transportation Projects

SECTION 4(f) DE MINIMIS DOCUMENTATION

Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Experience

Maplewood Avenue Downtown Complete Street Project

Vision Statement. District Objectives. Oakton Mixed-use District Vision and Objectives

VILLAGE OF CHANNAHON COMMERCIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES. Village of Channahon S. Navajo Drive Channahon, IL (815)

Prospect Community Plan Update Public Meeting November 2, 2017 OVERVIEW PROSPECT BEAUTIFICATION/CONNECTIVITY PLAN

The GATEWAYS Sub Area Master Plan. City of Walker

BUILDING SCALE AND SETBACKS 5 ELEMENTS:... 5 FAÇADES (COMMERCIAL/RESIDENTIAL) 5

PROJECT SITE The Proposed Project includes the Allen and Pike Street malls between Delancey and South Streets (see Figure 2C-1).

Potential Green Infrastructure Strategies May 6, 2015 Workshop

Main Street Reconstruction From Ninth Line to Stouffer Street. Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville. Public Information Centre

Table of Contents. Elm Avenue Improvement Plan City of Waco, Texas. Introduction 1. Existing Context 1 Figure 1 2.

Transportation. Strategies for Action

Street Flooding Mitigation Plan KYOVA Interstate Planning Commission. Presented to AMPO National Conference October 18, 2017

I-70 Corridor Enhancement Plan

East Corridor Final Environmental Impact Statement

Route 9 Gateway Project. October 9, 2014 Informational Meeting

The transportation system in a community is an

Toronto Complete Streets Guidelines

4.1 Build Alternative 1 Construction Phasing

VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION

Streets Vision

DRAFT ROOSEVELT ROAD. District Recommendations. Figure 5.23 The Roosevelt Road Corridor

John Portman Boulevard Corridor

Complete Streets Master Plan for Downtown New Britain CRCOG Transportation Committee Meeting Monday, December 9, 2013

TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS

Por favor, levanten la mano si necesita traduccion en espanol Please raise your hand if you need Spanish translation

2.5 Roads. Loading and service areas adjacent to Highway 401 should be screened through architectural walls and/or landscape buffer planting.

2016 REVISIONS COMMENT FORM RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION IN THE PUBLIC WAY COMMENT PERIOD: JUNE 1 TO JUNE 30, 2015

APPENDIX D: Visual and Aesthetic Conditions for NCCU Station Refinement. Durham-Orange Light Rail Transit Project

COMPLETE GREEN STREET CHECKLIST

Cottage Grove Road Reconstruction. City of Madison Engineering

Victoria Bridge Municipal Class EA Civic Works Committee

Engineering Department

Figure Example of out door dining in the public right-of-way.

Whitemarsh Comprehensive Plan Update: Housing & Land Use. Public Workshop #3: September 20, 2018

Public input has been an important part of the plan development process.

CHAPTER VIII Implementation

Public Meeting March 10 th 2011

Planning Districts INTRODUCTION

UAA School of Engineering Parking Garage Master Plan Amendment. 1. Purpose

New Stanton Project Update July 3, 2012

City of Burlington Downtown Street Design & Construction Standards

Pipeline Trail Master Plan Preliminary Concept Design. O Connor Mokrycke Consultants May 14, 2015 meeting

Village of Algonquin Beautification Plan

Mary Hills Nature Area. Roadway Lighting. The Minneapolis Clinic of Neurology Courage Kenny Rehabilitation Institute

Division 9 Southwood Ranch (CR 484/475/475A Corridor-Gateway Development Overlay) Purpose and Intent Applicability.

Design Guidelines and Standards for Sight Triangles. Sight Triangle MANUAL

Pedestrian and Bike Bridge LOGO

ULI St. Louis Technical Assistance Panel

Cleveland Innerbelt Bridge / Central Viaduct City Planning Commission November 6, 2009

Rights-of-Way Preservation Guidelines

Developer Panel Summary Report

Project Consulting Team:

CRA Five Year Capital Improvement Plan. September 2, 2015

March 1, PWG Meeting #4

ESTABLISH AN EFFICIENT TOWN CENTER

Lambeth Main Street Streetscape Improvements

495/MetroWest Development Compact Plan Citizen Planner Training Collaborative Conference. March 17, 2012

DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE GUIDELINES FOR DEVELOPMENT

City of Plattsburgh DRI: Downtown Streetscapes & Riverfront Access. Downtown Streetscape and Riverfront Access Design

South Yonge Street Corridor

Construction Engineering & Inspection

The Project. In 2013, construction was completed between 100 Street and 102 Street.

TORONTO COMPLETE STREETS GUIDELINES

Route 347. New York State Department of Transportation Region 10, Long Island. THE GREENING of ROUTE 347

2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Capital Projects in and near Odenton Town Center

Transcription:

Parapet/Formliner/Fencing

Cross Parapet/Formliner/Fencing Street Aesthetic Features Context The I-290 Phase I study is evaluating improvements along 13 miles of the Eisenhower Expressway, from west of Mannheim Road to Racine Avenue. The corridor is entirely within Cook County and extends through several communities including, Hillside, Westchester, Bellwood, Broadview, Maywood, Forest Park, Oak Park, and the City of Chicago. The existing expressway lies in a fully developed corridor consisting of a mix of commercial, residential, and public uses. Goal The Goal of I-290 Phase I Study Aesthetic enhancement is to improve the overall visual and experiential qualities of the corridor from both the expressway perspective as well as from the perspective from the local roads and bridges. Approach Each community along the corridor has its own local context, and represents two basic perspectives: the perspective of the expressway corridor traveler and the community perspective along the local cross-streets. At the local, cross road level, the aesthetic is driven by the local context and goals and will be coordinated with the individual corridor communities. As a starting point, basic crossroads design/features will be presented that include the standard design elements which will be the basis for community level discussions regarding what modifications or enhancements are desired. For the mainline corridor, a general aesthetic goal is to provide a consistent theme from the perspective of the expressway as a traveler throughout the length of the study area. The study team will present a consistent, overall expressway aesthetic concept for stakeholder consideration and coordination. 1

Cross Parapet/Formliner/Fencing Street Aesthetic Features I-290 Cross Street Aesthetic Features Within the I-290 Phase I study area there are 35 crossroad bridges and six pedestrian overpasses that provide north-south connectivity for the corridor communities over the expressway. Originally constructed in the 1950 s, these bridges are generally noted as deteriorating and lack adequate pedestrian, bike, ADA, and transit accessibility features. The I-290 improvement project presents an opportunity to work with the communities to develop a plan to address the current crossroad connectivity issues and identify pedestrian and aesthetic features that will enhance each crossroad as community assets. As a starting point for discussion with the corridor communities, this booklet generally outlines the basic features of the typical crossroads in this corridor based on current design standards. Each community and each crossroad have varying needs and context, which may result in aesthetic treatments that are unique from other communities and crossroads in the corridor. This document is intended to facilitate the discussion at the community level as a first step in the developing the crossroad aesthetics along the corridor. Summary of IDOT Cost Participation There are some items for which IDOT will provide a base aesthetic where 100% of the cost will be borne by IDOT, with optional enhancements to be borne by the municipality over and above the base cost. In other instances, the municipality would have varying cost responsibilities. The following pages outline IDOT Standard vs. Non-Standard Examples, which are assumed to have local cost and maintenance requirements for non-standard items. In addition, all iron and steel products and their coatings that are to be permanently incorporated into the project, are required to be manufactured in the United States as part of the FHWA s Buy America program. 2

Cross Street Aesthetic Features Mainline and Cross-Street Themed Aesthetics Cross street aesthetic features can be applied individually to each crossing through the community, or they can be tied together in a unified theme that will carry through each cross street as well as blend in with the areas adjacent to the corridor. 3

Parapet/Formliner/Fencing Parapets and Formliners Concrete parapets, retaining walls, bridge abutments and similar items will be constructed to IDOT standards at 100% state costs using a plain concrete surface. Enhancements such as decorative formliners and colored concrete on parapets and retaining walls are nonstandard items and may require local participation for the difference in cost of design and construction, depending upon the complexity of the design. Maintenance of standard parapet surfaces is IDOT responsibility. Maintenance of non-standard parapet surfaces may require local participation, depending on the complexity of design. IDOT STANDARD PARAPET NON-STANDARD PARAPET FORMLINER EXAMPLES Chicago Wall without Vertical Accents Bridge fascia aesthetic treatments (outward facing side) to be addressed as part of the overall mainline aesthetic concept Basic Accent Stripe Zig-Zag 4

Parapet/Formliner/Fencing (continued) NON-STANDARD FORMLINER EXAMPLES Chicago Wall (standard) Parapet, fence and railing designs must be crash worthy if located within the clear zone. Curbside barrier may be required. Geometric 5

IDOT STANDARD FENCE NON-STANDARD FENCE EXAMPLE Pedestrian Fencing Fencing/Railing Fencing/railing, where required for protection, will be constructed to IDOT standards at 100% state costs. Additional fencing/railing in locations where it is not warranted by IDOT policy would require 100% local cost participation of design (normally 15% of the construction cost) and construction. Decorative or other non-standard fencing/railing are non-standard items and require local participation for the difference in cost of design and construction. Maintenance of standard fencing/railing is IDOT responsibility. Maintenance of optional or non-standard fencing is 100% local responsibility. Parapet Accent Stripe with Standard IDOT Pedestrian Fencing Zig-Zag Parapet Pattern with Vertical Pedestrian Fence Example Arched or vertical Galvanized Fence and/or railing acceptable Fence required over CTA tracks 6

Pedestrian Parapet/Formliner/Fencing Fencing (continued) NON-STANDARD FENCING EXAMPLES Meacham Road over I-90 Mannheim Road decorative paint/fence Decorative Rail Curbside barrier required Devon Avenue over I-290 Chicago (Morgan Street) decorative vertical fence 7

Pedestrian Fencing (continued) NON-STANDARD PEDESTRIAN FENCING EXAMPLES POTENTIAL HOME AVENUE PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE OPTIONS Busse Woods Bridge over Higgins Road 8

Pedestrian Bridge Formliner NON-STANDARD PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE FORMLINER EXAMPLES IDOT Standard Pattern - Ashlar Limestone I-290 at Elgin-O Hare: IDOT standard noise wall formliner with leaf pattern accent Home Avenue Pedestrian Bridge Village logo visible from local street 9

Sidewalks Existing Sidewalks/Trails Where removed by construction, existing sidewalks/trails will be replaced to IDOT standards at 100% state costs. Deteriorated sidewalks/trails not removed by construction, but within project limits, can be replaced at the choice of the municipality, with removal costs borne 100% by the municipality and design/construction costs borne 80% by IDOT and 20% by the municipality. New Sidewalks/Trails New sidewalk/trails within project limits can be installed at the choice of the municipality, with design/construction costs borne 80% by IDOT and 20% by the municipality. Non-standard sidewalk features such as colored/textured concrete, or substituting a concrete surface for asphalt on a trail, require local participation for the difference in cost of design and construction. All sidewalks and trails are maintained by local agencies by policy. 10

Parapet/Formliner/Fencing Sidewalks (continued) IDOT STANDARD NON-STANDARD SIDEWALK EXAMPLES Colored Concrete Standard Width: 5 wide on bridge or match sidewalk on approach 5 wide with 2 buffer, or 7 wide at grade Maximum Width (for I-290 reconstruction): 12 feet on bridge 16 feet on bridge at CTA Blue Line station 100% local maintenance for sidewalk surfaces Brick Units/Precast Concrete Pavers Stamped Colored Concrete 11

Sidewalks (continued) NON-STANDARD SIDEWALK EXAMPLES (OFF-STRUCTURE) 12

Parapet/Formliner/Fencing Traffic Signals IDOT STANDARD NON-STANDARD TRAFFIC SIGNAL EXAMPLES US 20/Barrington Road Traffic Signals In general, IDOT and the municipalities share responsibility for installation, modernization, and relocation of traffic signals. However, the federal share is normally 80%, and the state and local share is the remaining 20% of design and construction. Maintenance is based on jurisdiction of the intersecting roadways. Enhancements such as painted or decorative poles and mast arms require local participation for the difference in cost of design, construction and maintenance. Painted Poles Fluted Poles 13

Lighting Existing Lighting IDOT will provide I-290 mainline and interchange lighting at 100% State cost and maintenance. Locally owned and maintained lighting impacted by the proposed project will be relocated and upgraded to Illuminating Engineering Society of America (IES) standards at the cost of the local municipality. New Lighting New lighting, proposed by the municipality, may be incorporated into the total improvement plans. All municipal lighting requires 100% local cost participation for design, construction and maintenance, and must meet IES standards. IDOT STANDARD NON-STANDARD LIGHTING EXAMPLES Color: Aluminum Pole Height: 47 ½ Arm Type: Mast Arm or Davit Arm Typical Light source is HPS (Cobrahead) but LED (Cobrahead) will soon be the standard Mast Arm Davit Arm 15

Lighting (continued) NON-STANDARD LIGHTING EXAMPLES Barrington Road Navy Pier All iron and steel products and their coatings that are to be permanently incorporated into the project, are required to be manufactured in the United States as part of the FHWA s Buy America program. 16

Non-Standard Features STREET FURNITURE AND BIKE RACKS ARE CONSIDERED NON-STANDARD Street Furniture/Bike Racks These items are 100% local cost participation for design, construction and maintenance. These features must be located outside of the roadway clear zone; local procurement may be better. 17

Non-Standard Features (continued) PLANTERS ARE CONSIDERED NON-STANDARD Planters These items are 100% local cost participation for design, construction and maintenance. Features must be located outside of the roadway clear zone. 18

Non-Standard Features (continued) WAYFINDING AND GATEWAY ELEMENTS ARE CONSIDERED NON-STANDARD Halsted Street (Jane Byrne Interchange) Canopy Feature Wayfinding and Gateway Elements These items are 100% local cost participation for design, construction and maintenance. Potential Corner Treatment 19

Noise Wall Aesthetics IDOT STANDARD NON-STANDARD NOISE WALL EXAMPLES Transparent Community side of noise walls could have custom stamping 100% local cost Replaced with standard panel Custom Stamping 20

Funding Sources Grant Programs ITEP One of the most popular funding sources for optional elements is the ITEP program, which in 2014 funded over $57 million in transportation enhancement projects such as bike paths, walking trails, historic preservation and streetscape beautification projects. These grants are given on a competitive basis and can either be used for enhancements within a companion transportation project, or for stand-alone enhancement projects. Local agencies must apply for ITEP grants. STP The Surface Transportation Program (STP) provides flexible funding that is used by states and localities on any Federal-aid highway, bridge projects on any public road, transit capital projects, and bus terminals and facilities. The federal share for the program generally is eight (80) percent, but is subject to the sliding scale adjustment. STP funds can be used for bicycle and/or pedestrian projects or elements of projects. Illinois Department of Natural Resources: IDNR administers Outdoor Recreation Grants-in-Aid programs. The programs, which are most relevant for bicycle and pedestrian projects include: 1) Bicycle Path Program helps with the acquisition, construction and rehabilitation of public, non-motorized bicycle paths and directly related support facilities, and 2) Recreational Trails Program provides up to 80% funding assistance for acquisition, development, rehabilitation and maintenance of motorized and non-motorized recreation trails. Safe Routes to School (SRTS): The Illinois Safe Routes to School Program (SRTS) has been administered by the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT). SRTS uses a multidisciplinary approach to improve conditions for students who walk or bike to school. Visit the CMAP website at http://www.cmap.illinois.gov/mobility/walking-and-bicycling/funding-sources for more information on these and other potential funding sources. 21