Shear Strength of Soils

Similar documents
EAT 212 SOIL MECHANICS

This document downloaded from vulcanhammer.net vulcanhammer.info Chet Aero Marine

Laboratory Tests to Determine Shear Strength of Soils

Compressibility and One Dimensional Consolidation of Soil

EFFECT OF COMPACTION ON THE UNSATURATED SHEAR STRENGTH OF A COMPACTED TILL

CHAPTER 8 SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS

Unsaturated Shear Strength Behavior under Unconsolidated Undrained Tests

Global Journal of Engineering Science and Research Management

COMPARISON OF SHEAR STRENGTH PARAMETERS OF BLACK COTTON SOIL WITH EFFECT OF RELATIVE COMPACTION

ISO/TS TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION

ScienceDirect. The Undrained Shear Strength of Overconsolidated Clays

Problems with Testing Peat for Stability Analysis

Consolidation Stress Effect On Strength Of Lime Stabilized Soil

An Experimental Study on Variation of Shear Strength for Layered Soils

Undrained shear strength in the assessment of slope stability of water defenses

Slope stability assessment

Bearing Capacity Theory. Bearing Capacity

Prof. B V S Viswanadham, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

Mechanical Behavior of Soil Geotextile Composites: Effect of Soil Type

Finite Element Methods against Limit Equilibrium Approaches for Slope Stability Analysis

LABORATORY STUDY ON THE CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT OF CLAY-FILLED GEOTEXTILE TUBE AND BAGS

Shear strength features of unsaturated clayey sand by lab test

Numerical Analysis of the Bearing Capacity of Strip Footing Adjacent to Slope

PILE FOUNDATIONS CONTENTS: 1.0 Introduction. 1.1 Choice of pile type Driven (displacement) piles Bored (replacement) piles. 2.

Fine Coal Refuse 25 Years of Field and Laboratory Testing Data and Correlations

The University of Iowa Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering SOIL MECHANICS 53:030 Final Examination 2 Hours, 200 points

Compaction. Compaction purposes and processes. Compaction as a construction process

Effect of pile sleeve opening and length below seabed on the bearing capacity of offshore jacket mudmats

PULLOUT CAPACITY OF HORIZONTAL AND INCLINED PLATE ANCHORS IN CLAYEY SOILS

Soil-Structure Interaction of a Piled Raft Foundation in Clay a 3D Numerical Study

GEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE

ISO/TS TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION. Geotechnical investigation and testing Laboratory testing of soil Part 10: Direct shear tests

Backfill Stress and Strain Information within a Centrifuge Geosynthetic-Reinforced Slope Model under Working Stress and Large Soil Strain Conditions

APPENDIX D. Slope Stability Analysis Results for Soil and Overburden Storage Mounds

Strength of Materials for Embankment Dams

Undrained shear strength determination and correlations on Søvind Marl Grønbech, Gitte Lyng; Nielsen, Benjaminn Nordahl

Analysis of Pullout Resistance of Soil-Nailing in Lateritic Soil

DRAFT ONONDAGA LAKE CAPPING AND DREDGE AREA AND DEPTH INITIAL DESIGN SUBMITTAL H.3 STATIC SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSES

Darcy's law 16 Deformation 23-32, 53, 98-99, ; elastic 19-20, 148-

THE ULTIMATE SKIN RESISTANCE OF CONCRETE PILE IN PARTIALLY SATURATED COHESIVE SOIL BY MODIFIED Β METHOD

EFFECT OF RELICT JOINTS IN RAIN INDUCED SLOPE FAILURES IN RESIDUAL SOIL

Experimental investigation and theoretical modelling of soft soils from mining deposits

SOIL SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS. Analyses of slopes can be divided into two categories: 6,Chapter 13 J. MICHAEL DUNCAN

A DETAILED ANALYSIS OF SLOPE STABILITY USING FINITE ELEMENT METHOD (FEM)

4 Slope Stabilization Using EPS Geofoam at Route 23A

Stress-Strain and Strength Behavior of Undrained Organic Soil in Kupondol, Kathmandu

THREE DIMENSIONAL SLOPE STABILITY

Triaxial testing of overconsolidated, low plasticity clay till

Triaxial testing of overconsolidated, low plasticity clay till

Identification of key parameters on Soil Water Characteristic Curve

Available online at ScienceDirect. Procedia Engineering 125 (2015 )

Reinforcement with Geosynthetics

Triaxial Behaviour of Stabilized Soil by Quarry Dust

Advanced Foundation Engineering. Introduction

GEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE

[Gupta* et al., 5(7): July, 2016] ISSN: IC Value: 3.00 Impact Factor: 4.116

Full Scale Model Test of Soil Reinforcement on Soft Soil Deposition with Inclined Timber Pile

The Effect of Soil Suction on Slope Stability at Notch Hill

LARGE-SCALE SHEAR TESTS ON INTERFACE SHEAR PERFORMANCE OF LANDFILL LINER SYSTEMS

Stability of Inclined Strip Anchors in Purely Cohesive Soil

Rapid Drawdown with Multi-Stage

Introduction. A soil is an earth concrete. Composition of a soil

EFFECTIVE STRESS RESPONSE OF CLAY TO UNDRAINED CYCLIC LOADING

Cavity expansion model to estimate undrained shear strength in soft clay from Dilatometer

TECHNICAL REPORT STANDARD PAGE 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No.

Advanced Foundation Engineering. Soil Exploration

Keywords: slope stability, numerical analysis, rainfall, infiltration. Yu. Ando 1, Kentaro. Suda 2, Shinji. Konishi 3 and Hirokazu.

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION. Road transport is an only means of transport that offers itself to the whole community

Dam Construction by Stages

Evaluation of undrained shear strength of soft New Orleans clay using piezocone

GLOSSARY OF GROUND IMPROVEMENT VOCABULARY

1 Introduction. 2 General Pile Analysis Features. 2.1 Pile Internal Forces and Displacements

Undrained Shear Strength of Saturated Clay

NUMERICAL STUDY ON STABILITY OF PLATE ANCHOR IN SLOPING GROUND

LOAD TRANSFER MECHANISM IN PULL-OUT TESTS

Sea to Sky Geotechnique 2006

GEOTEXTILE REINFORCED TWO LAYER SOIL SYSTEM WITH KUTTANAD CLAY OVERLAIN BY LATERITE SOIL

Attachment D. Ring Shear Testing Report (Dr. Timothy Stark)

Soil Strength and Slope Stability

Lightweight aggregates in Civil Engineering applications. Arnstein Watn Senior Scientist, SINTEF

BITUMINOUS DIGITRAC AUTO STABILITY PRESS MARSHALL AUTOMATIC DIGITAL TESTER MARSHALL TESTING MACHINE W/ RECORDER MODELS

Prof. B V S Viswanadham, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

Experimental tests for geosynthetics anchorage trenches

SOIL STABILIZATION USING NATURAL FIBER COIR

2.2 Soils 3 DIRECT SHEAR TEST

Strength Parameter Selection in Stability Analysis of Residual Soil Nailed Walls

A comparison of numerical algorithms in the analysis of pile reinforced slopes

Load-Carrying Capacity of Stone Column Encased with Geotextile. Anil Kumar Sahu 1 and Ishan Shankar 2

Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas

Piles subject to excavation-induced soil movement in clay

Behaviour of Black Cotton Soil Reinforced with Sisal Fibre

Study on Effect of Water on Stability or Instability of the Earth Slopes

GEOTEXTILE DEFORMATION ANALYSIS OF GEOSYNTHETIC CLAY LINERS WITH FEM

Design of Unpaved Roads A Geotechnical Perspective

Base resistance of individual piles in pile group

EFFECT OF CENTRAL PILE IN INCREASING THE BEARING CAPACITY OF BORED PILE GROUPS

APPLICATIONS IN FILTRATION AND DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL

FINAL COVER VENEER STABILITY ANALYSES FOR SCA DESIGN

Stability analysis of slopes with surcharge by LEM and FEM

This document downloaded from vulcanhammer.net vulcanhammer.info Chet Aero Marine

Transcription:

Shear Strength of Soils

Shear failure Soils generally fail in shear strip footing embankment failure surface mobilised shear resistance At failure, shear stress along the failure surface reaches the shear strength. th

Shear failure failure surface The soil grains slide over each other along the failure surface. No crushing of individual grains. SIVA Copyright 2001

Shear failure At failure, shear stress along the failure surface () reaches the shear strength th ( f ). SIVA Copyright 2001

Mohr-Coulomb Failure Criterion f c tan cohesion c f friction angle SIVA Copyright 2001 f is the maximum shear stress the soil can take without failure, under normal stress of.

Mohr-Coulomb Failure Criterion Shear strength consists of two components: cohesive and frictional. f c f tan c f c f tan frictional component f SIVA Copyright 2001

cand are measures of shear strength. Higher the values, higher the shear strength.

Mohr Circles & Failure Envelope Y X Soil elements at X Y different locations X ~ failure Y ~stable

Mohr Circles & Failure Envelope The soil element does not fail if the Mohr circle is contained within the envelope c GL Y c c c + Initially, Mohr circle is a point

Mohr Circles & Failure Envelope As loading progresses, Mohr circle becomes larger c GL Y c c.. and finally failure occurs when Mohr circle touches the envelope

Orientation of Failure Plane Y Failure plane oriented at 45 + /2 to horizontal c GL 45 + /2 45 + /2 Y c c c + 90+

Mohr circles in terms of & v v u h X = X h + X u effective stresses total stresses h v h u v

Envelopes in terms of & Identical specimens initially subjected to different isotropic stresses ( c ) and then loaded axially to failure c c f Initially c Failure c u f At failure, c, in terms of 3 = c ; 1 = c + f c, 3 = 3 u f ; 1 = 1 -u f in terms of

1-3 Relation at Failure 1 X 3 X soil element at failure 3 1 c 1 3 tan 2 (45 / 2) 2 tan(45 / 2) c 3 1 tan 2 (45 / 2) 2c tan(45 / 2)

2001 Brooks/ /Cole, a division of Thomson Le earning, Inc. Thomson Learning is a trademark used herein und der license. Figure 11.3 Mohr s circle and failure envelope SIVA Copyright 2001

Soil strength Soils are essentially frictional materials the strength depends on the applied stress Strength is controlled by effective stresses water pressures are required Soil strength depends on drainage different strengths will be measured for a given soil that (a) deforms at constant volume (undrained) and (b) deforms without developing excess pore pressures (drained)

Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion n The limiting shear stress (soil strength) is given by = c + n tan where c = cohesion (apparent) = friction angle

Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion The parameters c, are in general not soil constants. They depend on the initial state of the soil (OCR or I d ) the type of loading (drained or undrained) The Mohr-Coulomb criterion is an empirical criterion, and the failure locus is only locally linear. Extrapolation outside the range of normal stresses for which h it has been determined d is likely to be unreliable.

Effective stress failure criterion If the soil is at failure the effective stress failure criterion i will always be satisfied. c' tan ' n c and are known as the effective (or drained) strength parameters.

Effective stress failure criterion If the soil is at failure the effective stress failure criterion i will always be satisfied. c' tan ' n c and are known as the effective (or drained) strength parameters. Soil behaviour is controlled by effective stresses, and the Soil behaviour is controlled by effective stresses, and the effective strength parameters are the fundamental strength parameters. But they are not necessarily soil constants.

Total stress failure criterion If the soil is taken to failure at constant volume (undrained) then the failure criterion can be written in terms of total stress as c u n tan u c u and u are known as the undrained strength parameters

Total stress failure criterion If the soil is taken to failure at constant volume (undrained) then the failure criterion can be written in terms of total stress as c u n tan u c u and u are known as the undrained strength parameters These parameters are not soil constants, they depend strongly on the moisture content of the soil.

Total stress failure criterion If the soil is taken to failure at constant volume (undrained) then the failure criterion can be written in terms of total stress as c u n tan u c u and u are known as the undrained strength parameters These parameters are not soil constants, they depend strongly on the moisture content of the soil. The undrained strength is only relevant in practice to clayey soils that in the short term remain undrained. Note that as the pore pressures are unknown for undrained loading the effective stress failure criterion cannot be used.

1. Shear Box Test Tests to measure soil strength Motor drive Top platen Normal load Soil Load cell to measure Shear Force Porous plates Rollers Measure relative horizontal displacement, dx vertical displacement of top platen, dy

Shear box test Usually only relatively slow drained tests are performed in shear box apparatus. For clays rate of shearing must be chosen to prevent excess pore pressures building up. For sands and gravels tests can be performed quickly Tests on sands and gravels are usually performed dry. Water does not significantly affect the (drained) strength. If there are no excess pore pressures and as the pore pressure is approximately zero the total and effective stresses will be identical. The failure stresses thus define an effective stress failure envelope from which the effective (drained) strength parameters c, can be determined.

Typical drained shear box results Shear Load (F) Normal load increasing Horizontal displacement (dx)

Typical drained shear box results = F/A Peak Ultimate N 1 N 2 = N/A

Figure 11.6 Plot of shear stress and change in height of specimen against shear displacement for loose and dense dry sand (direct shear test) 2001 Bro ooks/cole, a division of Thomso on Learning, Inc. Thomson Learn ning is a trademark used herein n under license.

Interpretation of shear box tests A peak and an ultimate failure locus can be obtained from the results each with different c and values. All soils are essentially frictional and continued shearing results in them approaching a purely frictional state where c = 0. Normally consolidated clays (OCR=1) and loose sands do not show separate peak and ultimate failure loci, and for soils in these states c = 0. Overconsolidated clays and dense sands have peak strengths with c > 0. Note that dense sands do not possess any true cohesion (bonds), the apparent cohesion results from the tendency of soil to expand when sheared.

Shear box test - advantages Easy and quick test for sands and gravels Large deformations can be achieved by reversing shear direction. This is useful for determining the residual strength of a soil Large samples may be tested in large shear boxes. Small samples may give misleading results due to imperfections (fractures and fissures) or the lack of them. Samples may be sheared along predetermined planes. This is useful when the shear strengths along fissures or other selected planes are required.

Shear box test - disadvantages Non-uniform deformations and stresses in the specimen. The stress-strain behaviour cannot be determined. The estimated stresses may not be those acting on the shear plane. There is no means of estimating pore pressures so effective stresses cannot be determined from undrained tests Undrained strengths are unreliable because it is impossible to prevent localised drainage without high shearing rates In practice shear box tests are used to get quick and crude estimates of failure parameters

2. The Triaxial Test Tests to measure soil strength Deviator load Cell water O-ring seals Cell pressure Soil Confining cylinder Rubber membrane Porous filter disc Pore pressure and volume change

Triaxial Test Apparatus piston (to apply deviatoric stress) failure plane O-ring soil sample at failure perspex cell impervious membrane porous stone water cell pressure back pressure pedestal pore pressure or volume change

Types of Triaxial Tests deviatoric stress () Under all-around Shearing (loading) cell pressure c Is the drainage valve open? Is the drainage valve open? yes no yes no Consolidated U D i d Undrained sample Unconsolidated sample Drained loading loading

Types of Triaxial Tests Depending on whether drainage is allowed or not during initial isotropic cell pressure application, and shearing, there are three special types of triaxial tests that have practical significances. They are: Consolidated Drained (CD) test Consolidated Undrained (CU) test Unconsolidated Undrained (UU) test

For unconsolidated undrained test, in terms of total stresses, u = 0 Granular soils have no cohesion. c = 0 & c = 0 For normally consolidated clays, c = 0 & c = 0.

CD, CU and UU Triaxial Tests Consolidated Drained (CD) Test no excess pore pressure throughout the test very slow shearing to avoid build-up of pore pressure gives c and Can be days! not desirable Use c and for analysing fully drained Use c and for analysing fully drained situations (e.g., long term stability, very slow loading)

CD, CU and UU Triaxial Tests Consolidated Undrained (CU) Test pore pressure develops during shear Measure gives c and faster than CD (preferred way to find c and )

CD, CU and UU Triaxial Tests Unconsolidated Undrained (UU) Test pore pressure develops during shear very quick test Not measured unknown analyse in terms of gives c u and u Use c u and u for analysing undrained situations (e.g., short term stability, quick loading) = 0; i.e., failure envelope is horizontal

1-3 Relation at Failure 1 X 3 X soil element at failure 3 1 c 1 3 tan 2 (45 / 2) 2 tan(45 / 2) c 3 1 tan 2 (45 / 2) 2c tan(45 / 2)

Stress Point v h X stress point q stress point ( v - h )/2 h ( v + h )/2 v h p 2 v q v h 2 p or p

Stress Path During loading q Stress path is the locus of stress points Stress path Stress path is a convenient way to keep track of the progress in loading with respect to failure envelope. p or p

Failure Envelopes q failur e tan -1 (sin ) c ccos cos stress path p During loading (shearing).

Pore Pressure Parameters A simple way to estimate the pore pressure change in undrained loading, in terms of total stress changes ~ after Skempton (1954) 1 u B A Y 3 ( ) 3 3 1 u =? Skempton s pore pressure parameters A and B

B = u / σ 3 If soil is saturated B=1, therefore Therefore, u = σ 3 + A ( σ 1 - σ 3 ) If σ 3 = 0, then A = u / (σ 1 - σ 3 )

Pore Pressure Parameters B-parameter B = f (saturation,..) For saturated soils, B 1. A-parameter at failure (A f ) A f = f(ocr) For normally consolidated clays A f 1. For heavily overconsolidated clays A f is negative.

Stresses in triaxial specimens r F = Deviator load r r = Radial stress (cell pressure) a = Axial stress

Stresses in triaxial specimens r F = Deviator load r r = Radial stress (cell pressure) a = Axial stress From equilibrium i we have a r F A

Stresses in triaxial specimens F/A is known as the deviator stress, and is given the symbol q q a r ( ) ( ) 1 3 The axial and radial stresses are principal stresses If q = 0 increasing cell pressure will result in volumetric compression if the soil is free to drain. The effective stresses will increase and so will the strength increasing pore water pressure if soil volume is constant (that is, undrained). As the effective stresses cannot change it follows that t u = r Increasing q is required to cause failure

Strains in triaxial specimens From the measurements of change in height, dh, and change in volume dv we can determine Axial strain dh a h 0 Volume strain V dv V V 0 where h 0 is the initial height and V 0 is the initial volume

Strains in triaxial specimens From the measurements of change in height, dh, and change in volume dv we can determine Axial strain dh a h 0 Volume strain V dv V V 0 where h 0 is the initial height and V 0 is the initial volume It is assumed that the specimens deform as right circular cylinders. The cross-sectional area, A, can then be determined from A = A o 1 + dv V0 1 + dh h 0 = A o 1 - v 1 - a

Advantages of the triaxial test Specimens are subjected to (approximately) uniform stresses and strains The complete stress-strain-strength behaviour can be investigated Drained and undrained tests can be performed Pore water pressures can be measured in undrained tests, allowing effective stresses to be determined Different combinations of cell pressure and axial stress can be Different combinations of cell pressure and axial stress can be applied

Typical triaxial results q Increasing cell pressure a

Interpretation of Laboratory results 1. Drained shear loading In laboratory tests the loading rate is chosen so that no excess water pressures will be generated, and the specimens are free to drain. Effective stresses can be determined from the applied total stresses and the known pore water pressure. Only the effective strength parameters c and have any relevance to drained tests. It is possible to construct a series of total stress Mohr circles but the inferred total stress (undrained) strength parameters are meaningless.

Interpretation of Laboratory results Effective strength parameters are generally used to check the long term stability (that is when all excess pore pressures have dissipated) of soil constructions. For sands and gravels pore pressures dissipate rapidly and the effective strength parameters can also be used to check the short term stability. In principle the effective strength parameters can be used to In principle the effective strength parameters can be used to check the stability at any time for any soil type. However, to do this the pore pressures in the ground must be known and in general they are only known in the long term.

2. Undrained loading Interpretation of Laboratory results In undrained laboratory tests no drainage from the sample must occur, nor should there be moisture redistribution within the sample. In the shear box this requires fast shear rates. In triaxial tests slower loading rates are possible because conditions are uniform and drainage from the sample is easily prevented. In a triaxial test with pore pressure measurement the effective In a triaxial test with pore pressure measurement the effective stresses can be determined and the effective strength parameters c, evaluated. These can be used as discussed previously to evaluate long term stability.

Interpretation of Laboratory results The undrained tests can also be used to determine the total (or undrained) strength parameters c u, u. If these parameters are to be relevant to the ground the moisture content must be the same. This can be achieved either by yperforming UU tests or by using CIU tests and consolidating to the in-situ stresses. The total (undrained) strength parameters are used to assess the short term stability of soil constructions. ctions It is important that no drainage should occur if this approach is to be valid. For example, a total stress analysis would not be appropriate for sands and gravels. For clayey soils a total stress analysis is the only simple way to assess stability N t th t d i d t th b d t i d f il b t th Note that undrained strengths can be determined for any soil, but they may not be relevant in practice

Relation between effective and total stress criteria Three identical saturated soil samples are sheared to failure in UU Three identical saturated soil samples are sheared to failure in UU triaxial tests. Each sample is subjected to a different cell pressure. No water can drain at any stage.

Relation between effective and total stress criteria Three identical saturated soil samples are sheared to failure in UU triaxial tests. Each sample is subjected to a different cell pressure. No water can drain at any stage. At failure the Mohr circles are found to be as shown 3 1

Relation between effective and total stress criteria Three identical saturated soil samples are sheared to failure in UU triaxial tests. Each sample is subjected to a different cell pressure. No water can drain at any stage. At failure the Mohr circles are found to be as shown 3 1 We find that all the total stress Mohr circles are the same size, and therefore u = 0 and = s u = c u = constant

Relation between effective and total stress criteria Because each sample is at failure, the fundamental effective stress failure condition must also be satisfied. As all the circles have the same size there must be only one effective stress Mohr circle c' n tan ' 3 1 1 3

Relation between effective and total stress criteria Because each sample is at failure, the fundamental effective stress failure condition must also be satisfied. As all the circles have the same size there must be only one effective stress Mohr circle c' n tan ' 3 3 1 1 We have the following relations 1 3 1 3 2c u = N + 2 c N 1 3

Relation between effective and total stress criteria The different total stress Mohr circles with a single effective stress Mohr circle indicate that the pore pressure is different for each sample. As discussed previously increasing the cell pressure without allowing drainage has the effect of increasing the pore pressure by the same amount (u = r ) with no change in effective stress. The change in pore pressure during shearing is a function of the initial effective stress and the moisture content. As these are identical for the three samples an identical strength is obtained.

Significance of undrained strength parameters It is often found that a series of undrained tests from a particular site give a value of u that is not zero (c u not constant). If this happens either the samples are not saturated, or the samples have different moisture contents If the samples are not saturated analyses based on undrained behaviour will not be correct The undrained strength c u is not a fundamental soil property. If the moisture content changes so will the undrained strength.

Example In an unconsolidated undrained triaxial test the undrained strength is measured as 17.5 kpa. Determine the cell pressure used in the test if the effective strength parameters are c = 0, = 26 o and the pore pressure at failure is 43 kpa.

Example In an unconsolidated undrained triaxial test the undrained strength is measured as 17.5 kpa. Determine the cell pressure used in the test if the effective strength parameters are c = 0, = 26 o and the pore pressure at failure is 43 kpa. Analytical solution = = 1 3 1 Undrained strength 17.5 3 2 2

Example In an unconsolidated undrained triaxial test the undrained strength is measured as 17.5 kpa. Determine the cell pressure used in the test if the effective strength parameters are c = 0, = 26 o and the pore pressure at failure is 43 kpa. Analytical solution = = 1 3 1 Undrained strength 17.5 3 2 2 Failure criterion = N + 2 c N 1 3

Example In an unconsolidated undrained triaxial test the undrained strength is measured as 17.5 kpa. Determine the cell pressure used in the test if the effective strength parameters are c = 0, = 26 o and the pore pressure at failure is 43 kpa. Analytical solution = = 1 3 1 Undrained strength 17.5 3 2 2 Failure criterion = N + 2 c N 1 3 Hence = 57.4 kpa, = 22.4 kpa and cell pressure (total stress) = + u = 65.4 kpa

Graphical solution 17.5 26

Graphical solution 17.5 26 3 1

Graphical solution 17.5 26 3 1 1 3

T = M s + M e + M e M s = (πdh)c u x d/2 T = πc u [( d 2 h/2) +(βd 3 /4)] β = ½ for triangular mobilization of undrained shear strength β = 2/3 for uniform mobilization of undrained d shear strength β = 3/5 for parabolic mobilization of undrained shear strength