METRO Gold Line BRT CMC Meeting

Similar documents
METRO Gold Line BRT CBAC Meeting. August 23, 2018

METRO Gold Line Corridor Management Committee Notes for the August 2, 2018 Meeting Metropolitan Council Chambers

PROJECT BACKGROUND. Preliminary Design Scope and Tasks

Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit Transit Oriented Development (BRTOD) Helmo Station Area Plan

Transportation Committee

POLICY ADVISORY COMMITTEE

Atlanta BeltLine Corridor Environmental Study. Scoping Meeting August 2008

Mississippi Skyway Preliminary Engineering Report

Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis. Appendix A - Initially Considered Alternatives Screening

Environmental Assessment Page Purpose and Need

WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THE OPEN HOUSE?

Scope of Services. River Oaks Boulevard (SH 183) Corridor Master Plan

This page is intentionally blank.

Mavis Road Class Environmental Assessment

FDOT D4 Complete Streets

RESOLUTION NO. R Refining the route, profile and stations for the Downtown Redmond Link Extension

Northwest Rail Corridor and US 36 BRT Development Oriented Transit Analysis 4.4 STATION AREA FINDINGS

Route 1 Corridor Study

Rapid Transit Implementation Working Group September 14, 2017

SH 199 Corridor Master Plan. Community Meeting No. 2 May 31, 2017

Ashland BRT Environmental Assessment: logos of CTA, CDOT, Chicago Department of Housing and Economic Development

FANSHAWE PARK ROAD/RICHMOND STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS. PUBLIC INFORMATION CENTRE 2 June 16, 2016

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 TH 14 WEST STUDY AREA Project Description Functional Classification Purpose of the Project

Shift Rapid Transit Public Participation Meeting May 3, 2017

August 2016 COTTAGE GROVE STATION AREA PLANNING REPORT

St. Clair Avenue West Area Transportation Master Plan

Route 5 Corridor Land Use and Transportation Plan

Southern Gateway Project and Public Green

West Broadway Transit Study Initial Screening of Alternatives Memo

PUBLIC HEARING. Thursday, December 14, 2017 FDOT Urban Office 2198 Edison Avenue Jacksonville, FL 32204

ALTERNATIVES. NCDOT made an early decision to first determine how to build the project (construction method) followed by what to build (alternatives).

The Ambassador Bridge/ Gateway Project

Inform you of the purpose and scope of the study for PTH 100 and a proposed future St. Norbert Bypass;

Portage Parkway Environmental Assessment Public Information Centre No. 1

3 MARKHAM NORTH-SOUTH LINK CORRIDOR PUBLIC TRANSIT IMPROVEMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT UPDATE

I-90 Mississippi River Bridge & Interchange Project

Transportation. Strategies for Action

Open House RIVER DES PERES GREENWAY: LANSDOWNE SHREWSBURY METROLINK TO FRANCIS R. SLAY PARK

Route 110 Alternatives Analysis

Richmond Road Complete Street Meeting #1, April 25, 2016

Reconnecting New Haven: Downtown Crossing

Public Hearing. Charlotte County-Punta Gorda MPO - Meeting Rooms A and B March 14, open house at 4 p.m., formal presentation at 5 p.m.

NorthPoint, Inc. Community-Based Development Concept

Kanata Light Rail Transit Planning and Environmental Assessment Study

Eglinton West LRT Update

12/9/2013. HOLLYWOOD/PINES CORRIDOR PROJECT AMPO 2013 Annual Conference October 24, Our Perspective. Broward.

112th Avenue Light Rail Options Concept Design Report JUNE 2010 PREPARED FOR PREPARED BY TBG PGH

Southeast Extension to RidgeGate Parkway Scoping Booklet

South Davis County COMMUNITY SPOTLIGHT

Chapter 1.0 Introduction

Lesson 6. Corridor Planning

CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA

Corridor Management Committee. September 29, 2017

Place and Opportunity: An Equity Assessment of the Twin Cities Region (

TORONTO COMPLETE STREETS GUIDELINES

This Review Is Divided Into Two Phases:

PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS

SOUTHWEST TRANSITWAY (STAGE 2) PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE

Infrastructure Engineering Planning Construction Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN Tel: Fax:

Rapid Transit Implementation Working Group

Executive Summary. NY 7 / NY 2 Corridor

DOWNTOWN REDMOND LINK EXTENSION SEPA Addendum to the East Link Project Final Environmental Impact Statement

STATUS REPORT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FOR IMPROVED ACCESS. at the NORTH WHITE PLAINS STATION

AGENDA ACTION ITEMS INFORMATION ITEMS

D2 Subway Project Development. Public Meeting September 12, 2018

Welcome. Comprehensive Plan & Transportation Plan Open House November 7, 2012

Corridor Management Committee. April 14, 2016

South 200 th Link Extension Open House April 3, 2013

July 12, Columbus City Council City Hall 90 West Broad Street Columbus, OH RE: I-70/71 Columbus Crossroads Project

Places29: List of Implementation Projects

Better Cycling. The City will update the cycling master plan (London ON Bikes) based on the approved BRT network.

TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT

LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (LACMTA)

Highway 12 Sibley Avenue Reconstruction. Project Overview and Progress To Date Litchfield City Council April 17, 2017

1 Metrolinx overview. Mission We connect our communities. Vision Getting you there better, faster and easier

Regional Transportation District

Issues Requiring Future Study

South Corridor Rapid Transit Project Public Kick-Off Meeting

Right-of-Way Acquisitions and Relocations Technical Memorandum

Welcome. Walk Around. Talk to Us. Write Down Your Comments

The Project. In 2013, construction was completed between 100 Street and 102 Street.

Don Mills Crossing Study and Celestica Lands Development Application Community Meeting, Open House, and Breakout Discussions

Construction Engineering & Inspection

Chapter 1: Introduction

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of January 28, 2017 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT-2

Point A Point B Point C Point D. City of Hapeville Public Meeting July 25, 2017

Promoting Economic Development Through Upfront SEPA Review: Lessons from South Downtown Tacoma

DOMINION BOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN A MODEL FOR CHESAPEAKE S FUTURE

CHAPTER 7: Transportation, Mobility and Circulation

ITEM #8. Regional Smart Growth Program. Regional Smart Growth Program. Presentation Overview. Coast Highway Vision and Stategic Plan.

Port Credit Local Advisory Panel October 20 th Meeting

Expo Light Rail Line. Expo Line Community Meeting Phase 2 Design Update November 2011

Update. What is the Osborne Bridge Rehabilitation project all about and how is it being planned? Neighbourhood Advisory Committee (NAC)

PREPARED FOR: PLATTEVIEW ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

master plan of highways bus rapid transit amendment

Optimize. Innovate. Deliver. Engineering the Future of Bus Rapid Transit

Metro 2010 Pedestrian Symposium Walking into the Future City

Transportation Systems and Utility Infrastructure

Toronto Complete Streets Guidelines

S C O P E O F W O R K A P R I L

Transcription:

METRO Gold Line BRT CMC Meeting April 26, 2018

Today s Topics Welcome and Introductions Project Overview CMC Roles and Responsibilities Current Project Baseline: Scope and Cost Estimate Overview Municipal Collaboration Stakeholder and Public Engagement Update Other/Discussion and Next Steps

Project Overview

Gold Line BRT Overview 8,000 Est. Daily Riders (2040) $420M Est. Capital Cost (YOE) $5.1M Annual Operating Cost Opening 2024 Serving the East Metro: 2 counties, 5 municipalities 301,000 jobs (2040) 522,000 people (2040)

Project Office Leadership Charles Carlson Senior Manager, BRT Metro Transit Chris Beckwith GBRT Project Manager Metro Transit Lyssa Leitner GBRT Deputy Proj. Manager Washington County Marc Briese GBRT Design/Construction Manager MnDOT Project Management Staff and Consultants Design Staff and Consultants

Cost Update PD Funding ($25M approved, authorized) Overall Funding ($420M anticipated, YOE) State 0.5% Ramsey Co. 34% State 8% CTIB 24% Ramsey County 26.5% Federal New Starts 45% Washington Co. 34% Washington County 26.5% CTIB 1.5%

Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit Project Timeline

GBRT Goals and Objectives Goals and Objectives developed and reviewed by project partners during Alternatives Analysis Goals Goal 1: Improve Mobility Goal 2: Provide a Cost-Effective, Economically Viable Transit Option Goal 3: Support Economic Development Goal 4: Protect the Natural Environmental Features of the Corridor Goal 5: Preserve and Protect Individual and Community Quality of Life Objectives 1. Maximize number of people served (future) 2. Maximize transit ridership 3. Maximize travel time savings 4. Minimize traffic mobility impacts 5. Minimize costs and maximize cost-effectiveness 6. Maximize number of people served (existing) 7. Maximize future development opportunities 8. Minimize potential environmental impacts 9. Maximize potential benefits to and minimize potential impacts on the community 10. Minimize adverse parking, circulation, and safety impacts

GBRT Purpose and Need Purpose and Need Statement developed and reviewed by project partners in 2014 The purpose of the Gold Line is to provide transit service to meet the existing and long-term regional mobility and local accessibility needs for businesses and the traveling public within the project area. Need Statements: Limited existing transit service throughout the day and demand for more frequent service over a larger portion of the day Policy shift toward travel choices and multimodal investments Population and employment growth, increasing access needs and travel demand Needs of people who depend on transit Local and regional objectives for growth and prosperity

GBRT CMC Roles and Responsibilities

GBRT CMC Overview ---See CMC Charter Handout--- Purpose To advise the Metropolitan Council, Ramsey County and Washington County on the design and construction of the Gold Line BRT project To utilize technical and community input to address issues relating to the environmental review, project development, engineering, final design, and construction of the GBRT Membership and Leadership Structure Meetings

Gold Line Committee Structure Issue Resolution Teams (IRTs) Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Community and Business Advisory Committee (CBAC) Corridor Management Committee (CMC) Counties Metropolitan Council Follows LRT project precedents and Transitway Guidelines

Project Baseline: Scope and Cost Estimate Overview

Cost Uncertainty by Project Phase % Design Complete Cost Uncertainty % Design Complete Cost Uncertainty C O S T E S T I M A T E B U D G E T 1% 15% 30% Project Project Project Development Project Development Development Development 60% Engineering 100% Construction 14

Baseline Project Scope What is a Project Baseline? The baseline in project management refers to the initial cost, scope and schedule of the project. Establishing a baseline happens before the project starts; otherwise, project managers will not have a system of measure for changes. What do we know about the GBRT Project Baseline? It represents the point-in-time cost estimate, scope and schedule Current baseline was established during the Planning/Pre-PD Phase It is not a final representation of what will be designed and constructed It provides a context for managing scope adjustments while maintaining a focus on funding and schedule constraints 15

Baseline Project Cost Estimate EA/Planning Cost Estimate (1% Eng.) $420 M Total Project Contingency 35% Escalation Factor 3% Base Year Estimate 2016 Forecast Year Year of expenditure

Baseline Project Scope - Guideway Mixed Traffic BRT Route (1.9 Miles, no roadway improvements) Downtown St. Paul Century Avenue to Greenway Ave 4 th Street Bridge Bielenberg Drive south of Nature Path to Woodbury Theatre Station 2-Lane Dedicated BRT Guideway (5.1 Miles) Mounds Boulevard to Century Avenue Helmo Avenue Concrete Pavement for Guideway Split Side Running BRT Guideway (0.8 Miles) Greenway Avenue Station to 4 th Street Includes Pavement Rehabilitation 17

Baseline Project Scope - Stations 6 Enhanced Downtown Stops WB Minnesota Station WB Landmark Station Smith Avenue Transit Center Station amenities include: Pylon Sign, Off-Board Fare Collection, Small Shelter Union Depot Stop Pylon Sign & Off-Board Fare Collection Wacouta Stop Pylon Sign & Off-Board Fare Collection Includes Civil Improvements EB 7 th Street Station EB Landmark Station EB Minnesota Station 18

Baseline Project Scope - Stations 10 New Stations New Stations Include: Concrete Platforms Unique GBRT Shelters Off-Board Fare Collection Landscaping (10% of Station Cost) Lighting (5% of Station Cost) Heat in Shelters Security Systems & Information Displays Benches, Bike Racks & Trash Receptacles Not Included: In-Slab Heat for Station Platforms Public Art 19

Baseline Project Scope - Stations 5 Bus Bypass Lanes (4-Lane Section at Stations) Mounds Boulevard Station Etna Street Station White Bear Avenue Station Sun Ray Station Maplewood Station 20

Baseline Project Scope Park & Ride Facilities Sun Ray Transit Center Structured Parking 500 Stalls Helmo Station Park & Ride Surface Parking 100 Stalls 21

Baseline Project Scope Park & Ride Facilities Woodbury Theatre Station Park & Ride Structured Parking 250 Stalls Reconstruction of Woodbury Theatre Parking Lot 2 Driver Layover Facilities Included 22

Baseline Project Scope - Bridges BRT Bridges (No Pedestrian Facilities included) Johnson Parkway Bridge Etna/TH 61 Bridge Century Avenue Bridge 23

Baseline Project Scope - Bridges BRT & Roadway Bridge Helmo Avenue/Bielenberg Drive Bridge (2 Roadway Lanes, 2 BRT Lanes & 1 Pedestrian Facility) 24

Baseline Project Scope - Bridges Roadway Bridges Reconstruct Existing Earl Street Bridge & Includes Pedestrian Facilities Reconstruct Existing Northbound TH 61 Ramp to Westbound TH 94 (No Pedestrian Facilities Included) New White Bear Avenue Over BRT Bridge & Includes Pedestrian Facilities 25

Baseline Project Scope - Bridges Pedestrian Bridges Reconstruct Existing Maple Street/Mound Street Pedestrian Bridge Over TH 94 New Pedestrian Bridge over Eastbound TH 94 Ramp to Southbound TH 61 Reconstruct Hazelwood Street Pedestrian Bridge Over TH 94 26

Baseline Project Scope - Civil Civil Elements as Shown in Pre-PD Plans Roadway Reconstruction Roadway Rehabilitation in Mixed Traffic Areas Pedestrian Facilities Noise Wall Relocations Retaining Walls 27

Baseline Project Scope - Civil Other Civil Elements Sun Ray Shopping Center Parking Lot Reconfiguration Sun Ray Lanes Parking Lot Reconstruction (280 Stalls) Reconstruct Existing Helmo Avenue Plaza East Metro Sports Parking Lot Reconfiguration (Located West of Helmo Avenue and North of TH 94) HOM Furniture Parking Lot Reconfiguration Reconstruct Hartford Loading Dock Driveway 28

Baseline Project Scope Utilities Utilities will be evaluated for relocation at project cost under the following conditions: Utility is located beneath a footing of a proposed parking structure, retaining wall and/or station Utility is in conflict with proposed BRT systems or communications elements Water and sewer do not meet cover requirements due to proposed BRT grading Utility Review Zone Risk Assessment dictates utility must be relocated outside of the guideway Private utility relocation costs (within public right-of-way) will be determined based on existing agreements that the utility has to be located within public right-of-way 29

Baseline Project Scope Environmental Mitigation Stormwater mitigation and floodplain protection required to support the project is included Contaminated material removal will be based on the Response Action Plan/Construction Contingency Plan. Current project costs assume 10-20% of the corridor has impacts. 30

Baseline Project Scope Urban Design & Lighting Functional landscaping and urban design elements are included (per FTA guidance) Non-Functional Landscape Elements (landscape elements installed solely for visual or aesthetic appeal) and Public Art are not included Lighting to meet Metro Transit s design criteria at stations, crossings and in the guideway is included Existing lighting impacted by the proposed construction will be replaced 31

Project Scope Traffic Signals 7 New Traffic Signals 3 New Traffic Signals for Center Running Guideway 5 Modifications to Existing Traffic Signals 6 At-Grade Crossing Warning Devices for free right movements 32

Municipal Collaboration

Municipal Collaboration in PD ---See Municipal Collaboration Handout--- Advisory committees: CBAC, TAC, CMC on-going IRTs on-going 15% staff level design review Q1, 2019 Resolutions of Support Q2, 2019 Comments on Environmental Assessment Q3, 2019

Continued Municipal Collaboration after PD Continued involvement with advisory committees: CBAC, TAC, CMC IRTs transition to Design Development/Refinement Teams Traditional 30%, 60%, 90% staff level design reviews Trunk Highway and County State Aid Municipal Consent (where applicable) 35

Stakeholder and Public Engagement Update

Stakeholder and Public Engagement Update Draft Stakeholder and Public Engagement Plan complete Short Term Need (Q1-Q2): Re-introduce the public to the Gold Line How/when input can be provided Written content for newsletters, social media, media releases When invited, project update presentations for project partners Medium Term Need (Q3) Input on design updates Engagement process to be discussed at IRTs Public Engagement will always be ongoing

For more information: www.metrotransit.org/gold-line-project Metro Transit BRT/Small Starts Project Office Charles Carlson, Senior Manager (612) 349-7639 charles.carlson@metrotransit.org Lyssa Leitner Deputy Project Manager lyssa.leitner@metrotransit.org METRO Gold Line BRT Project Office Chris Beckwith, Project Manager christine.beckwith@metrotransit.org Marc Briese Design & Construction Manager marc.briese@metrotransit.org 38

Reference Slides

Issue Resolution Teams

Technical Issues Resolution Segment Technical Issue Project Elements / Issues for Resolution SAINT PAUL (SP) 1 Downtown St. Paul Downtown Routing and Station Locations Kellogg Avenue/3rd Street/Mounds Boulevard intersection design and operations Potential Section 106 impacts relative to design in Dayton s Bluff 2 Dayton's Bluff Area area Guideway Location/Configuration 3 Etna Street Station 4 White Bear Avenue Station 5 Sun Ray Station Siting and location of Mounds Blvd and Earl Street Station Etna Street/TH 61 intersection design and operations Pedestrian facilities in TH 61 interchange area Siting and location of Etna Street Station Location of pedestrian bridge west of White Bear Avenue Hudson Road visual and parking impacts White Bear Avenue underpass Siting and location of White Bear Avenue Station Siting, location and size of potential park-and-ride facility Siting and location of Sun Ray Station Sun Ray Frontage Road Design

Technical Issues Resolution Segment Technical Issue Project Elements / Issues for Resolution MAPLEWOOD (M) LANDFALL (L) OAKDALE (O) WOODBURY (W) 6 Maplewood Station 7 8 Greenway Avenue Station Helmo Avenue Station 9 Bielenberg Drive 10 Woodbury Theatre Station Pedestrian infrastructure at Century Avenue Guideway Crossing Control at 3M Siting and location of Maplewood Station BRT guideway and mixed traffic operations on east end of Century Avenue Siting and location of Greenway Avenue Station Traffic and BRT lane operations on Hadley Avenue and 4th Street Bridge Siting and location of park-and-ride facility Truck access to Country Hearth Building Helmo Avenue/Bielenberg Drive Bridge Center running or side running BRT lanes on Bielenberg Drive Utility concerns near Hudson Road and Bielenberg Drive due to data centers in the area. Traffic operations at Tamarack and Bielenberg Drive Siting and location of Tamarack Station Siting, location and sizing of Park-and-Ride at Woodbury Theatre and integration with existing express bus routes

Technical Issues Resolution Segment Technical Issue Project Elements / Issues for Resolution SYSTEM- WIDE (SW) 11 Stormwater Stormwater treatments in the corridor 12 Maintenance and Operations Identification of facility and guideway maintenance requirements and mitigation/minimization strategies Maintenance agreements