Asparagus Response to Water and Nitrogen

Similar documents
Sugarbeets Enjoy Warm Winter

A Preliminary Report on Asparagus Harvest Duration

Timing Kerb Applications in Lettuce

Microirrigation of Young Blueberries in Florida 1

Irrigating Olives. Janet Caprile UCCE Farm Advisor Alameda & Contra Costa Counties

Effect of Five Planting Dates on Yield of Six Sweet Onions

Hawaii Agriculture Research Center -1- Vegetable Report 2. Hawaii Agriculture Research Center Vegetable Report 2 January 2000

Vegetable Report 1 from Experiment Station, HARC December 1998

Bench Top Production Hydroponic Production

INEEL (1500) [45] 5.6 C 217 mm 60. Precipitation (mm) Temperature (oc) Month

Management of Microsprinkler Systems for Florida Citrus 1

Irrigation management in a drought year. What drought means to the tree, and how best to deal with it

Crops: Selection & Cultivation

High Tunnel Tomato Production Horticulture and Armstrong Farms 2007

Evaluation of Foliar Insecticide Approaches for Aphid Management in Head Lettuce

Hops Production. Dr. Heather Darby UVM Extension Agronomist

Extending the Season

Gi een Lffects. Landscape Maintenance Service For: Village Green Townhomes Lane Blvd NW Orting,WA

Abstract. Cuvinte cheie: caisa, radacina, profil de sol Keywords: apricot, root, cavity. 1. Introduction

Paul Vossen University of California Cooperative Extension Farm Advisor. Dealing with Drought

Research Report: Effects of early season heating, low tunnels, and harvest time on ginger yields in NH, 2017 Introduction. Zingiber officinale

Part 2: Landscape Management. Types of Fertilizer. General-purpose. Slow-release Organic Liquid

Pistachio Project Planning, Irrigation Systems and Irrigation Management. Trevor Sluggett Irrigation Agronomist AgriExchange Pty Ltd

High Tunnel Winter Greens Production

Irrigating Lawns When Water Supply is Reduced Howard Neibling, Extension Water Management Engineer, University of Idaho

Avocado Tree Pruning in Chile

Forcing Containerized Roses in a Retractable Roof Greenhouse and Outdoors in a Semi-Arid Climate

Annuals and Perennials. Ursula Schuch School of Plant Sciences University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ

Optimizing Cherry Production: Physiology-Based Management. Gregory Lang Michigan State University

SEASONAL CROP COEFFICIENT OF GERBERA SOILLESS CULTURE

Traditional. Attachment I Roof Garden Care & Maintenance Requirements. February 2013

Asparagus investigations in south Louisiana

Seasonal soil moisture and nitrogen availability

North Florida Fertilization Strategies that Promote Healthy Turf

Using Liquid Sources of Potassium Fertilizer in Highbush Blueberry. David Bryla USDA-ARS Horticultural Crops Research Unit Corvallis, OR

Vegetarian Newsletter

Imperial County Agricultural Briefs

Maximizing Vine Crop production with Proper Environmental Control

HEAD LETTUCE. Presented by

White Rot Fungicide Evaluations in Fresno County & Nitrogen Balance Progress Report

Flowering Behaviour of Helichrysum obconicum DC.

Virginia Nutrient Management Standards and Criteria Revised July 2014

Primocane-fruiting Blackberry Cane Management

Organic Production in High Tunnels

Food Control Plans or National Programmes Cold Hold Records 2019

POTATO VARIETY RESPONSE TO PHOSPHORUS FERTILIZER

WLAC Facilities Committee Meeting. September 18, 2017

Homeowner s Guide to Basic Landscape Care in Colorado

Research Report Row Spacing Effect on Forage Sorghum Yield and Quality at Maricopa, AZ, 2015

Roof Runoff Harvesting Benefits for Regional Conditions in Low Density and Medium Density Residential Areas. Leila Talebi 1 and Robert Pitt 2

Asparagus (Asparagus officinalis) is a

Heat Pumps and Public Swimming Pools, a Perfect Match

Efficient Irrigation, Smart Controllers and Climate Appropriate Shade Trees. Clovis Community College Center Clovis, CA

Countywide Recycling and Disposal Facility Weekly Progress Report 08/22/08

Appendix A. Reference Evapotranspiration (ETo) Table.

Shifting Patterns of Water Demand: Socio-Demographic Challenges for Water Managers

Some Things to Start Off With

Low-Input New Groundcover and Native Grass Species for Turfgrass Replacement in the Low Desert

Vegetarian Newsletter

Vetiver System for Xinchang Railway Embankment Stabilization The First Vetiver Application for Railway in China

Heritage Park Irrigation System Inspection Review of Water Use Estimated Water Budget Potential for Savings

Dehumidification: Energy Efficiency Comparisons

Introduction. Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences North Florida Research and Education Center Suwannee Valley

EGGPLANT PRODUCTION GUIDELINE CUSTOMER SERVICES: MEMBER OF THE PLENNEGY GROUP SEEDS OF SUCCESS

THE EFFECTS OF MINITUBER SIZE AND HARVEST DATE ON GERMINATION, TUBER SET, AND YIELD OF RUSSET BURBANK POTATOES. Steven R. James '

Virginia Nutrient Management Standards and Criteria Revised October 2005

Sprigging Bermudagrass

Long-term protection. against Chafer grubs. Merit Turf Long lasting treatment of Chafer grubs and Leatherjackets

Monopotassium Phosphate-Based Starter Fertilizers Enhance Snapbean Yield in Florida George J. Hochmuth 1

New Westminster Downtown Parking Strategy Public Open House #1 September 13, 2012

Kimberly Rollins, Professor, Department of Economics, University of Nevada, Reno

Project Leaders Curt R. Rom University of Arkansas Dept of Horticulture 316 PTSC, Fayetteville AR

Full Season Comparison of Weather Based Smart Controllers

Remodeling Market. Kermit Baker. Remodeling Futures Conference November 9, Harvard University JOINT CENTER FOR HOUSING STUDIES

Estimated Corn Field Drying

Lesco Fertilizer Evaluation

Alfalfa Winterkill Winter of

California Pepper Commission ANNUAL Report for Title: The Effect of Nitrogen Fertilization on Yield and Quality of Bell Peppers

MEASURED PERFORMANCE DATA FOR

Cork County Energy Agency

Winter Canola Survival

Ditylenchus dipsaci, which proliferates in the storage

Copyright 2003 IBACOS, Inc. All rights reserved.

Performance of Berries in Field and High Tunnel Production System

Workgroup. UCD Alfalfa. Utilizing Plant Tissue Testing & Application Methods to Maximize Fertilizer Efficiency

Section 5: Vegetables and Bulbs

New Planting. A&L Canada Laboratories Small Fruit News Letter Vol. 3 April 17, application should be at a 90 o direction to the row direction.

Gardening Beyond the Frost

Understanding Surface Water Runoff at Breneman Farms

With the following directions you can be successful at growing vegetables.

Managing Phosphorus to Optimize Potato Tuber Yield in the San Luis Valley

Differential seed dormancy and germination requirements of two upland prairie sedges Carex inops ssp. inops and Carex tumulicola

Transfer Station Recycling Update SWANA Technical Session-Waste Diversion 4 2/24/2017 2/28/2017

Untbersrttp of &tt?ona. SUDAN GRASS IN ARIZONA By R. S. HAWKINS, Assistant Agronomist

Toronto District School Board Church Street Junior Public School

Acknowledgement: Ralph Prahl, Prahl & Associates, contributed critical review and analysis

Strategies for Summer Utility Savings. Residential Environmental Program Series May 15, 2013

Heat Consumption Assessment of the Domestic Hot Water Systems in the Apartment Buildings

Identifying the SIX Critical Control Points in High Tunnel Production

GRAIN STORAGE AERATION PRESENTED BY: BRENT BLOEMENDAAL AERATION EXPERT

Transcription:

Asparagus Response to Water and Nitrogen Item Type text; Article Authors Roth, Robert L.; Gardner, Byrant R. Publisher College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ) Journal Vegetable Report Download date 25/07/2018 05:34:00 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/214273

Asparagus Response to Water and Nitrogen Robert L. Roth and Bryant R. Gardner Ansrxncr The relationships of asparagus yields to varying levels of water and nitrogen were determined. Maxinuem yields of 345, 560 and 300 crates /acre were produced for asparagus crowns that were 3, 4 and 5 years old, respectively. A total seasonal water depletion rate of 98 inches was calculated for the fern growing season. Optimum nitrogen applications were estimated at approximately 350-0 lb /ac. INTRODUCTION Asparagus production in the desert Southwest is totally dependent on irrigation to supply the water requirements. Nitrogen is a critical nutrient that is required to obtain maximum yields. If farm managers are to maximize returns, they must have information which will relate yield to different levels of water and nitrogen. MATERIALS AND METHODS A self -moving lateral sprinkler irrigation system was modified to accurately apply 9 levels of water and nitrogen. The amount of water applied ranged from 50% to 150% and the nitrogen levels varied from 33% to 167%; 100% was the optimum level for both the applied water and nitrogen. The optimum applied amount of water (100 %) was determined by using a neutron moisture meter to schedule irrigations so that an adequate moisture level was maintained. Tissue analysis verified that adequate levels of nitrogen were maintained in the plant tissue in those plots where 100% nitrogen was applied. This study was conducted at the University of Arizona Yuma Mesa Agricultural Center. The soil was a Superstition sand with a infiltration rate of approximately 3 inches per hour. 'Meadowland Select' asparagus seed was planted in a nursery during July 1979 to obtain crowns for transplanting. These crowns were transplanted on 7 Feb. 1980, at a depth of 6 inches in rows spaced 12 inches apart, on beds 68 inches apart. The crowns were spaced 10 inches apart in each row resulting in a population of 18,500 plants /acre. The crowns were planted on flat beds, rather than using the commercial practice of raised beds. An overhead sprinkler irrigation system applied the water so furrows were not needed. The irrigation system applied water at a high rate for a short duration, exceeding the soil infiltration rate. By planting on flat beds, the irrigation water was more uniformly distributed in the soil profile. The differential irrigation and nitrogen treatments were imposed about two months after the crowns were transplanted. Initially all plots received the same amount of water and nitrogen fertilizer to insure uniform plant establishment. The asparagus fern was grown until late October, when the irrigations were terminated to induce plant dormancy. The plants used up the remaining soil water; the ferns dried, usually by mid -December. The dried fern was removed by burning; the soil surface was then rototilled to a depth of 3 inches to remove any remaining dried asparagus stocks and to prepare the surface so emerging spears could be easily harvested. Approximately 7 inches of water was applied to all plots in late January to refill the soil profile. Soil temperatures usually warmed sufficiently so that asparagus spears were harvested by early February. All harvests lasted for 60 consecutive days; then the asparagus was allowed to fern and grow until late October, when the 48

irrigations were again terminated. The first harvest season (1981) lasted only 29 days because the transplants were only one year old; the crown and root system had not fully developed to sustain a 60 -day harvest. The 1982, 1983. and 1984 harvests lasted for 60 days. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Crown survival and fern growth were exceptional; growth exceeded of 6 feet the first year for those plots that received adequate water and nitrogen. In subsequent years, the fern growth exceeded 8 feet. Typically, irrigation water was applied three times weekly during the fern growing season. The total seasonal moisture depletion during the fern growing season was calculated to be 98 inches for the 1982 and 1983 growing seasons. The maximum daily soil water depletion was 0.55 inches, which occurred from late June through early August. The total soil moisture depletion during the 60 -day harvest season was 0.87 inches for 1984, which resulted in a daily depletion rate of only 0.01 inches. Irrigations during the harvest season may not be required to replace soil moisture. Spear emergency can be reduced for a short period after an irrigation because soil temperature is reduced. Irrigations could be required for other cultural practices, such as: to prevent spear damage from blowing sand; to firm the soil to improve foot traffic; or to cool the soil surface during hot weather to prevent the spear brackets and growing tips from becoming ferny before they reach a marketable length. Nitrogen fertilizer was injected into the irrigation water weekly from April to mid- September. Nitrogen was applied soon after the last harvest when the spears started to fern. The amount of water and nitrogen applied each month is listed in Table 1 for the 100% water and nitrogen applied treatment. The amounts of water and nitrogen applied to the other treatments are proportional to the amounts listed in Table 1. All asparagus spears were trimmed to 9 inches in length and into seven commercial sizes, as defined by the California Agricultural Code for loose asparagus. Badly misshapen spears or those with growing tips that were not fairly compact were graded as culls. Table l.. Monthly water and nitrogen applications to the 100% treatments. MON 1981 1982 1983 1984 inch lb /ac inch lb /ac inch lb /ac inch lb /ac Mar 2.2 25 6.7 25 - - - - Apr 3.0 18 6.5 38 3.8 37 6.3 39 May 5.0 38 8.6 37 8.3 50 13.4 81 Jun 10.0 38 10.2 32 16.2 71 19.6 88 Jul 17.3 10 14.6 49 17.8 54 19.3 49 Aug 13.8 62 13.4 38 13.4 48 18.1 64 Sep 10.7-11.3 12 14.0 48 17.5 28 Oct 4.6-6.5-8.6-7.8 - Nov- - - - - - - - Dec- - - - - - - - Jan 8.7 33 3.0-7.2-7.0 - Feb 3.4-11.5-2.2-0.6 - Sum 78.6 224 92.3 231 91.5 308 109.6 349 49

For this study, harvested spears were trimmed so that no white color showed. The numbers and weights of each size and the culls were recorded daily from each plot. Total asparagus yields were determined for each growing season by adding the amount harvested each day for all the sizes. The yield contours in crates /ac were determined over the range of water and nitrogen applied and are shown in Figure 1 for the four growing seasons. An asparagus crate is equivalent to 30 pounds. The results shown in Figure 1 for the 1981 harvest suggest that insufficient water and nitrogen applications were made during the previous growing season to obtain maximum yield. The 1982 maximum yield was 345 crates /ac when 105 inches of water and 330 lb /ac of nitrogen were applied. The asparagus yields were substantially greater in 1983; a maximum yield was 560 crates /ac for an application of 110 inches of water and 480 lb /ac of nitrogen. In 1984 the maximum yield was 300 crates /ac, with 120 inches of water and 520 lb /ac of nitrogen were applied. The average amount of water applied to obtain maximum yield was about 110 inches. If water applications were reduced to 98 inches (a 10% reduction) the yields would still be 98% of the maximum. Nitrogen applications could also be reduced to 350-450 lb /ac and the yields would still be 90% of the maximum. Using actual water and nitrogen costs, the farm manager can optimize returns from the relationships shown in Figure 1. 50

1981 (interval = 4) 1982 (interval = 25) 35 30 25 20 15 10 60 80 100 5 120 60 80 100 120 1 500 1983 (interval = 50) 60 1984 (interval = 25) 0 50 300 30 200 20 100 60 80 100 120 1 160 1.0-60 Figure 1. Asparagus yield response to Water and Nitrogen in crates /ac. 80 100 120 1 160 160 180