Design Review Commission Report

Similar documents
Design Review Commission Report

Design Review Commission Report

Design Review Commission Report

Architectural Review Board Report

14825 Fruitvale Ave.

Design Review Commission Report

ATTACHMENT 2. Planning Commission Resolution with Clean Copy of Ordinance

~BEVE~) Design Review Commission Report. City of Beverly Hills

Infill Residential Design Guidelines

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM

Design Review Application *Please call prior to submittal meeting to determine applicable fees*

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM

Architectural Review Board Report

PC RESOLUTION NO ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL (AC)

Bylaw A Bylaw to amend Bylaw 12800, as amended, The Edmonton Zoning Bylaw Amendment No. 2239

RESOLUTION NO

Planning Commission Staff Report February 19, 2009

M E M O R A N D U M CITY PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF SANTA MONICA

CITY OF VACAVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item No. G. 1 STAFF REPORT August 4, Staff Contact: Tricia Shortridge (707)

CITY OF PLACERVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

C-I-10. The effect of establishing a comprehensive site review as follows will: B. Reduce the cluttered aspects of current development by:

City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SIMI VALLEY DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

CITY OF MERCER ISLAND DESIGN COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT NOVEMBER 15, 2012

B L A C K D I A M O N D D E S I G N G U I D E L I N E S for Multi-family Development

Planning Commission Report

Historic District Commission Staff Report February 1 st, 2017

Design Review Commission Report

Joint Design Review Body Report

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (MASTER PLAN & UNIT PLAN)

STAFF BRIEF. Project: 2016-COA-356 Meeting: September 8, th Street Oxford Hotel

DATE: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF FEBRUARY 24, 2016

Resolution : Exhibit A. Downtown District Design Guidelines March 2003

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM

Historic District Commission

WILSON PLACE FINAL DESIGN

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY

CITY OF SAN MATEO ORDINANCE NO

Historic District Commission

Sec Development design approval and procedures.

Planning Commission Staff Report June 5, 2008

Historic District Commission Staff Report May 3 rd, 2017

Historic District Commission Staff Report March 2 nd, 2016

Housing and Coach House Guidelines - Ladner

CHAPTER 530 SITE PLAN REVIEW

WINDSOR GLEN DESIGN GUIDELINES

Recommendation: Conduct public hearing and provide the applicant with an approval.

CITY OF ALAMEDA PLANNING BOARD Draft RESOLUTION

COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION

ARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINES

P.C. RESOLUTION NO

FLORIN ROAD CORRIDOR Site Plan and Design Review Guidelines Checklist

Historic District Commission Staff Report September 7 th 2016

SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: FINAL PLAN REVIEW- PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN (PDP)

BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORWICH

Design Review Commission Report

Landscape Design Requirements and Guidelines for Private Lots in the Old Town North Neighborhood

Construction and Landscaping on Public Property

ASHLAND RANCH COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ARCHITECTURAL / LANDSCAPE GUIDELINES

The Highway Overlay District applies to an area within the City of Papillion's zoning jurisdiction described as:

CITY OF DEERFIELD BEACH Request for City Commission Agenda

Historic Preservation Commission Motion No. 0171

Gas Stations ottawa.ca

Zoning OBJECTIVE: in the zoning. is to make. projects for. the Planning and. are attached ITTALS: Department

Historic District Commission Staff Report November 4 th & 18 th, 2015

TOWN OF HILLSBOROUGH SAN MATEO COUNTY

CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION MEETING 455 North Rexford Drive, Beverly Hills, CA Commission Meeting Room 280-A

Mayor Leon Skip Beeler and Members of the City Commission. Anthony Caravella, AICP, Director of Development Services

Case Martin Luther King Drive and 212 and 216 North 6 th Street

DATE: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 27, 2016 SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR THE REMOVAL OF FIVE HERITAGE TREES AT 95 MERCEDES LANE (APN )

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM

5.7 Design Criteria for the Private Realm Organization of Private Realm Design Standards and Guidelines Guidelines vs.

Design Guidelines for Residential Subdivisions

codes for the operation of City business; and WHEREAS, the Bonita Springs City Council has determined that it is in

Residential Design Guidelines

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

PLANNING COMMISSION Work Session Meeting Agenda

Request Alternative Compliance to the prescribed criteria of the Oceanfront Resort District Form-Based Code. Staff Planner Kristine Gay

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

Historic Preservation Commission Motion No Certificate of Appropriateness

GUIDELINES REPLACEMENT HOUSING GUIDELINES LOCATION INTRODUCTION URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

Request Change in Nonconformity. Staff Recommendation Approval. Staff Planner Jonathan Sanders

13. New Construction. Context & Character

Historic District Commission

DESIGN REVIEW STANDARDS CITY OF LANGLEY

Planning Commission Staff Report February 5, 2015

Chapter RM MULTI FAMILY BUILDING ZONES

4 January 11, 2012 Public Hearing APPLICANT:

LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION PLAN PREPARATION GUIDELINES

DRAFT DESIGN GUIDELINES

CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT DESIGN REVIEW BOARD IBOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Coast Highway APN

RESIDENTIAL GUIDELINES CHECKLIST

KASPER. City of Georgetown, Texas PUD Planned Unit Development. December 30, 2015 Revised January 27, 2016

This chapter contains the design standards and guidelines for development and improvement of office and industrial buildings and

Standards (R-3) Figure B-11: R-3 Residential Standards Exhibit

CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. TO: Parking and Public Improvements Commission

5.1 Commercial and Industrial Development. (Effective April 1, 2006)

Future Five. Design/ Development Guidelines. January 2008 Amended June 08 per City Council motion

Wide asphalt driveway abutting school property. garage built with incompatible materials, too close to park. incompatible fencing materials

Transcription:

City of Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (310) 285-1141 FAX. (310) 858-5966 Design Review Commission Report Meeting Date: Monday, December 5, 2016 Subject: Project Applicant: Recommendation: 524 North Beverly Drive (PL1629376) A request for an R-1 Design Review Permit to allow the construction of a new two-story single-family residence located in the Central Area of the City north of Santa Monica Boulevard. The Commission will also consider adoption of a Categorical Exemption, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. SIA Architectural Design Conduct public hearing and provide the applicant with an approval. REPORT SUMMARY The applicant is requesting review and approval of a new two-story single-family residence, located in the Central Area of the City, north of Santa Monica Boulevard. The proposed style is identified by the applicant as a Contemporary style; however, as the project does not adhere to a pure architectural style, the project is before the Commission for review. URBAN DESIGN ANALYSIS Final refinement of the design for the proposed contemporary-style single-family residence in conjunction with the continued studies recommended by staff, will serve as a positive enhancement to the streetscape. The design resolutions and additional architectural details are being requested as follows, for final review and approval by Staff in advance of submitting for plan check: Review the ground floor of the street-facing elevation to consider the inclusion of an additional high-quality material to complement the façade. Study the design for the open space on the second floor of the southern elevation, as visible from the public right-of-way, to better engage the design of this portion of the building with the main façade. Study the design and provide final material selections with physical samples and specifications for the pedestrian gate and automobile entrance gate along the street edge and consider softening the design so as not to detract from the architecture. Provide a final detail for the eaves in conjunction with the inset reclaimed wood component. In addition, provide final details and specifications for the hardscape design proposed for the central driveway in the front setback. In addition, provide a final window and door schedule with manufacturer specified. Attachment(s): A. Detailed Design Description and Materials (applicant-prepared) B. Project Design Plans C. DRAFT Approval Resolution Report Author and Contact Information: Georgana Millican, Associate Planner (310) 285-1121 gmillican@beverlyhills.org

Design Review Commission Report 524 North Beverly Drive December 5, 2016 Project-specific conditions have not been proposed as a result of this analysis; however, the Commission may wish to consider such comments during the course of its review. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT The subject project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA Public Resources Code 21000 21178), pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines in that the project includes the review of building design, colors and materials to the façade of the building, front yard landscaping or minor low-scaled accessory structures, such as fences or walls. Additionally, since the property has not been designed by an architect listed on the City s Master Architect List nor has it been listed on the City s Historic Resource Survey, it does not warrant further review as a potential historical resource. It can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the subject activity could result in a significant effect on the environment. PUBLIC OUTREACH AND NOTIFICATION The project requires mailed public notice within 100 feet and the block face of the subject property be mailed, and an on-site notice at the subject property be posted, ten (10) days prior to the hearing. The public notice for this project was mailed on Monday, November 21, 2016; the site was posted on Monday, November 21, 2016. To date staff has not received comments in regards to the submitted project.

Attachment A Detailed Design Description and Materials (applicant-prepared) Design Review Commission Report 524 North Beverly Drive December 5, 2016

City of Beverly Hills Design Review Application Page 3 of 13 SECTION 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION / ZONING INFORMATION A Indicate Requested Application: Track 1 Application (Administrative Review) Project must adhere to a pure architectural style identified in the City s Residential Design Style Catalogue. The Catalogue is available online at: http://www.beverlyhills.org/cbhfiles/storage/files/filebank/3435 Residential%20Design%20Catalog%20May%202008.pdf Plans must be prepared and stamped by an architect licensed in the State of California. Three (3) sets of plans required (see Section 6 for plan size requirements). Track 2 Application (Commission Review) Eight (8) sets of plans required (see Section 6 for plan size requirements). Public Notice materials required (see Section 5 for public notice requirements). B Briefly describe the architectural style(s) that you are proposing and how the proposed materials, finishes and proportions aid in achieving the style(s): C D E Identify the Project Zoning (City Zoning Map available online at http://gis.beverlyhills.org/) R 1 R 1.5X2 R 1.8X R 1X R 1.6X R 1.5X R 1.7X Site & Area Characteristics Lot Dimensions: Adjacent Streets: Lot Area (square feet): Lot is currently developed with (check all that apply): Single Story Residence Two Story Residence Guest House Accessory Structure(s) Vacant Other: F Are any protected trees located on the property? (See Beverly Hills Municipal Code Section 10 3 2900)? Yes No If YES, provide the following information: Quantity Sizes Reason for Removal Heritage: Native: Urban Grove: G Has the existing residence been designed by a notable architect or is it identified on any historic resource inventory, including the City of Beverly Residential Survey? (available online at: http://www.beverlyhills.org/citygovernment/departments/communitydevelopment/planning/historicpre servation/historicresources) Yes No If yes, please list Architect s name: Updated 4/8/2015

City of Beverly Hills Design Review Application Page 4 of 13 SECTION 3 PROJECT DETAILS AND MATERIALS (continues on next page) A Describe your public outreach efforts to adjacent neighbors and property owners: B Indicate the project zoning details pursuant to Beverly Hills Municipal Code Section 10 3 2400: Code Regulation Allowed By Code Existing Condition Proposed Condition Height: Roof Plate Height: Floor Area: Rear Setbacks: Side Setbacks: S/E S/E S/E N/W N/W N/W Parking Spaces: C List the specific materials and finishes for all the architectural features of the project (Be Specific): FAÇADE (List all material for all portions visible from the street) WINDOWS (Include frame, trim, glass, metal, etc) DOORS (Include frame, trim, glass, metal, etc) PEDIMENTS ROOF CORBELS CHIMNEY(S) Updated 4/8/2015

City of Beverly Hills Design Review Application Page 5 of 13 SECTION 3 PROJECT DETAILS AND MATERIALS (continued from previous page) COLUMNS BALCONIES & RAILINGS TRELLIS, AWNINGS, CANOPIES DOWNSPOUTS / GUTTERS EXTERIOR LIGHTING PAVED SURFACES FREESTANDING WALLS AND FENCES OTHER DESIGN ELEMENTS D Describe the proposed landscape theme. Explain how the proposed landscaping complements the proposed style of architecture: Updated 4/8/2015

City of Beverly Hills Design Review Application Page 6 of 13 SECTION 4 DESIGN ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS A Clearly identify how your project adheres to each of the required findings of the Design Review Commission: 1. Describe how the proposed development s design exhibits an internally compatible design scheme. 2. Describe how the proposed development s design appropriately minimizes the appearance of scale and mass, how the design enhances the garden like quality of the City and appropriately maximizes the use of required open space within the proposed architectural style. 3. Describe how the proposed development will enhance the appearance of the neighborhood. 4. Describe how the proposed development is designed to balance the reasonable expectation of the development for the owner with the reasonable expectation of privacy of the neighbors. 5. Describe how the proposed development respects prevailing site design patterns, carefully analyzing the characteristics of the surrounding group of homes and integrates appropriate features that will ensure harmony between old and new. Updated 4/8/2015

293.53 REQ'D SIDEYARD SETBACK 15'-0" 9'-0" 21 R. @ 7" 20 T. @ 11" UP 294.51 294.44 295.02 295.29 90.00' N42 21'51"W 294.23 NOTE TO ALL: No changes shall be made to these plans or specifications without prior approval from the Architect. Unauthorized changes will constitute a breach of Contract. 296.93 FD SPK&W LS 5411 ON CL INTER PER PWFB 1316 PG 758 296.83 296.04 295.84 294.54 295.55 295.73 296.82 295.45 295.41 295.38 295.46 SIA ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN L =7. R 1 0 0' 50' 50' C 7 9' =3 2 74. 295.79 A.C. BEVERLY DRIVE 17 L = 13 0.2 2 ' Average grade around ext'g house: 3,253.05 / 11 = 295.73 ' WV 296.02 295.93 294.65 WV WV R=2 8 7 4.4 1 295.96 295.39 TOP "X" 294.89 FL L =9 3 0.3 4 ' C 295.04 BOT "X" 295.02 BOT "X" 295.26 TC 294.76 FL A.C. 294.83 TC 294.36 FL 7 0' 295.47 TOP "X" 294.95 FL 293.51 L =8 0 0.0 9 ' 295.51 294.07 TOP "X" 293.59 FL A.C. 35' 35' RAMP 295.60 295.66 GRASS CONC CURB & GUTTER 295.68 PALM TREE 293.53 BOT "X" 293.23 BOT "X" SLPB 295.62 L = 10 1. 6 2 ' R=2 9 2 4.4 1 51.14' N46 45'45"E C 296.03 293.60 TOP "X" 293.10 FL 294.89 PALM TREE 292.96 TC 292.51 FL 295.70 BW GRASS 295.32 BW CONC SIDEWALK 295.50 294.53 PALM TREE A.C. DWY 293.70 FD L & T PER PWFB 1316 PG 123 ALLEY 293.49 294.77 BW 293.73 PALM TREES CARMELITA AVE. DIRT GRASS 295.41 TC 294.80 FL GRAVEL SLPB 293.27 PALM TREE 293.89 BW 293.44 293.18 BW 295.67 18"Ø TREE 295.67 BW 35'-0" REQ'D FRONT YARD SETBACK CONC SIDEWALK 294.01 293.17 CONC SIDEWALK 295.19 TOP "X" 294.63 FL 295.84 294.59 BOT "X" 295.27 294.61 BOT "X" 295.38 295.18 TOP "X" 294.61 FL 294.11 294.31 294.29 293.23 NOTE: THE MATERIAL BETWEEN THE PAVERS AT THE FRONT YARD WALKWAY AND DRIVEWAY ARE BONDED AND NOT LOOSE. Req'd Setback Line CONC DWY REQ'D SIDEYARD SETBACK L =3 15.9 2 ' 295.64 14"Ø TREE R=4 5 8 3.7 5 CONC CURB & GUTTER DIRT TWO STORY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH A DETACHED GAME ROOM, 1-CAR PORT AND A 2-CAR GARAGE 2ND STORY ABOVE FIRST FLOOR +296.00' FIRST FLOOR FINISHED SLAB 295.68 295.40 PLANTER 220.52' 294.92 295.14 BW FIRST FLOOR PLANTER 2ND STORY ABOVE 294.78 TC 294.24 FL CONC SIDEWALK Req'd Setback Line 295.11 18"Ø TREE L =2 4 4.9 8 R=4 5 4 8.7 5 Req'd Setback Line DIRT LANDSCAPE AREA LOT 10, BLK 53 BEVERLY HILLS M.B. 11-186-187 (NOT A PART) COVERED DECK 294.72 294.84 BW POOL 295.52 24"Ø TREE N46 45'45"E 294.37 TC 293.86 FL 294.48 Req'd Setback Line N 295.15 FH 294.34 CONC SIDEWALK DIRT BASKETBALL COURT 60'-8" 293.74 BOT "X" 294.28 TOP "X" 293.71 FL CONC CURB & GUTTER REQ'D REAR YARD SETBACK 294.29 CAR PORT CONC DWY 294.53 BW DRIVEWAY NOTHING FD EST CL INTER PER PWFB 1316 PG 123 293.68 BOT "X" 294.11 TOP "X" 293.60 FL 295.81 FF 2 CAR CARAGE GAME ROOM/ THEATER +296.00' FIRST FLOOR FINISHED SLAB 294.16 294.99 SLPB 294.31 295.82 295.15 294.49 293.91 295.94 TW A.C. 294.97 294.68 294.74 294.49 294.28 294.05 293.90 C 2 0' 293.89 ALLEY WV 294.46 293.66 294.56 WV 10' 10' 294.41 Permit Date P r o j e c t Beverly Drive Residence 524 N Beverly Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 Owner 20230 Wells Drive Woodland Hills, CA 91364 t: 818-704-0667 f: 818-704-0760 www.siaarchdesign.com SITE PLAN c 2010 SIA All designs, ideas, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by this drawing are owned by, and are the property of the SIA and were created, evolved and developed for use on, and in connection with the specified project. Arrangements or plans shall neither be used on any other work nor be disclosed to any other person, firm or corporation for any use whatsoever without written permission of SIA. SIA and/or its principals and employees waives any and all liability or responsibility for problems that may occur when these plans, drawings, specifications, and/or designs are followed without the professionals guidance with ambiguities, or conflicts which are alleged. 11/11/16 Alta Standadrd I 113 N San Vicenete Blvd. Suite 300 Beverly Hills CA 90211 PROPOSED PROJECT AREA BUILDING SETBACKS scale: prepared by: M.D. TOTAL FIRST & SECOND FLOOR 10,322.06 Sq. Ft. FRONT SETBACK : 35.00 FEET job #: 2016-247 MAX. ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA: 1,500 Sq. Ft. + 40% OF LOT AREA 1,500 Sq. Ft. + 40% (22,167.00) = 1,500 Sq. Ft. + 8,866.80 = 10,366.80 Sq. Ft. SIDE SETBACKS : REAR SETBACK : LOT WIDTH : 78.00 FEET SOUTH SIDE SETBACK : 9.00 FEET NORTH SIDE (STREET SIDE) SETBACK : 15 FEET LOT DEPTH X 30% -9.00' = 232.26' X 30% - 9.00' = 60.67' A-0.0

CARMELITA AVE. RAMP SLPB CONC SIDEWALK CONC DWY 6' CMU FENCING FOUNTAIN/SCULPTURAL FEATURE CONC SIDEWALK FH CONC SIDEWALK CONCRETE PLANTER CONC DWY SLPB 5' HIGH FENCE WITH SELF-CLOSING/SELF-LATCHING GATE GRAVEL 4' ARTIFICIALTURF AREA BASKETBALL COURT C CONC SIDEWALK C CONC CURB & GUTTER DATE 10-13-2016 SCALE AS SHOWN GREENWALLS DRAWN BY STEPHANIE OBERC FIRE FEATURE CHECKED BY ART ALANIZ 7'-6" POTS FOR PLANTS BEVERLY DRIVE GRASS SCORED CONCRETE 21'-0" BAJA SHELF 50' X 16' POOL MOVIE AREA REVISIONS/PLAN LOG 7'-0" A.C. DWY GRAVEL BETWEEN PAVERS 6'-0" 1'-4" 30' POOL LOUNGE AREA 7'-6" 14'-0" CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY DISTANCE TO MATCH EXISTING DRIVEWAY 10'-6" 2'-2" SLPB 3' ARTIFICIAL TURF AREA 5'-0" BBQ AND BAR AREA PROJECT AND CLIENT NAME 1 L-1.0 CONCRETE PLANTER 5' HIGH FENCE WITH SELF-CLOSING/ SELF-LATCHING GATE TREE WELL STEEL RAISED HERB BEDS BENDER BOARD TO RETAIN GRAVEL POURED IN PLACE CONCRETE TOTAL FRONT LOT AREA = 4,920 SF ALLOWABLE PAVING = (4,920 SF X.33) + 200 SF = 1,824 SF PROPOSED PAVING AREA = 1,820 SF (PROPOSED) < 1,824 SF (ALLOWABLE) RESIDENCE 524 N. BEVERLY HILLS DR. BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210 SHEET DESCRIPTION 3'-0" 2'-0" 4'-0" 2'-0" 8'-0" CALL BOX 2'-0" 16'-0" 2'-0" 3'-6" HARDSCAPE PLAN WITH FENCE ELEVATION HOUSE NUMBERS SMOOTH PLASTER FINISH WALL 5 2 4 6'-0" 3'-0" 28'-0" RECESSED LIGHTING 4" CAST IRON WHEELS (X2) SOLID METAL PANELS IN LOWER PORTION STAINED GLASS PANELS IN TOP PORTION FRONT FENCE ELEVATION 1 1/4" = 1'-0" P-RE-SIA-BEVE-01 0 5 10 15 20 feet 3/32" = 1'-0" NORTH SHEET NUMBER PROJECT NUMBER L-1.0 SEED GROUP, INC. IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF REPRODUCTIONS OF THIS DOCUMENT GENERATED BY OTHERS FROM ELECTRONIC MEDIA. NOT PUBLISHED. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 9

PL PL OLEA EUROPEA 'WILSONII' LIGHT GREY STUCCO DATE SCALE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY 10-13-2016 AS SHOWN STEPHANIE OBERC ART ALANIZ 5 24 REVISIONS/PLAN LOG EXISTING PALMS TO REMAIN ALOE STRIATA DIETES GRANDIFLORA ECHEVERIA X 'RUFFLES' SEDUM PACHYPHYLLUM AGAVE ATTENUATA ECHEVERIA X 'IMBRICADA' ECHEVERIA X 'AFTERGLOW' STAINED GLASS PANELS IN UPPER PORTION. SOLID METAL PANELS BELOW. 2 FRONT LANDSCAPE ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0" P-RE-SIA-BEVE-02 PROJECT AND CLIENT NAME RESIDENCE 524 N. BEVERLY HILLS DR. BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210 SHEET DESCRIPTION LANDSCAPE ELEVATION Olea europea 'Wilsonii' Dietes grandiflora 'Variegata' Echeveria 'Ruffles' Sedum pachyphyllum GATE DESIGN SHEET NUMBER PROJECT NUMBER L-1.1 9 Agave attenuata Aloe striata Echeveria imbricata Echeveria 'Afterglow' (cluster) SEED GROUP, INC. IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF REPRODUCTIONS OF THIS DOCUMENT GENERATED BY OTHERS FROM ELECTRONIC MEDIA. NOT PUBLISHED. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Agave tequiliana (7) Dietes grandiflora `Variegata` Phoenix canariensis (75) (4) Echeveria x `Ruffles` Platanus x acerifolia Ficus pumila (56) (4) Echeveria x `Afterglow` (54) (60) CARMELITA AVE. Prunus ilicifolia lyonii (102) FH CONC DWY RAMP SLPB CONC SIDEWALK CONC SIDEWALK CONC SIDEWALK CONC DWY SLPB GREENWALLS TO BE DETERMINED BY OTHERS C C Echeveria x `Imbricata` (9) CONC CURB & GUTTER CONC SIDEWALK DATE 10-13-2016 Agave attenuata (7) SCALE DRAWN BY AS SHOWN STEPHANIE OBERC CHECKED BY ART ALANIZ BEVERLY DRIVE GRASS VARIOUS SUCCULENTS TBD, TYP. REVISIONS/PLAN LOG A.C. DWY SLPB Agave x `Blue Glow` (26) PLANT SCHEDULE Sedum pachyphyllum (212) Aloe striata (10) (3)EXISTING SYAGRUS PALM TREES TO REMAIN TREES BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE WATER USE QTY REMARKS Turf Sod Enviroturf (1,550 sf) Ficus nitida (46) Olea europaea `Wilsonii` (3) SHRUBS BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE WATER USE QTY REMARKS Lagerstroemia x `Tuscarora` (1) PROJECT AND CLIENT NAME RESIDENCE Lagerstroemia x `Tuscarora` Crape Myrtle Coral Pink 24"box Low 1 Plant per Plan Olea europaea `Wilsonii` Wilson Olive 48"box Low 3 Plant per Plan Phoenix canariensis Canary Island Date Palm 15 gal Low 4 Existing Platanus x acerifolia London Plane Tree 15 gal 4 Existing Agave attenuata Agave 15 gal Low 7 Plant per Plan Agave tequiliana Blue Agave 15 gal Low 7 Plant per Plan Agave x `Blue Glow` Blue Glow Agave 15 gal Low 26 Plant per Plan Aloe striata Coral Aloe 5 gal Low 10 Plant per Plan 524 N. BEVERLY HILLS DR. BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210 SHEET DESCRIPTION PLANTING PLAN Syagrus romanzoffiana Queen Palm Existing Low 3 Existing. Keep Dietes grandiflora `Variegata` Striped Fortnight Lily 1 gal Low 75 Space per Plan. 3` O.C. GROUND COVERS BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE WATER USE SPACING QTY REMARKS Echeveria x `Afterglow` Afterglow Echeveria 1 gal Low 60 Plant per Plan Turf Sod Enviroturf Enviroturf Blend sod Low 1,550 sf Place per Plan Echeveria x `Imbricata` Hen and Chicks 1 gal Low 9 Plant per Plan Echeveria x `Ruffles` Afterglow Echeveria 1 gal Low 56 Plant per Plan Ficus nitida Weeping Fig 5 gal Low 46 Space per Plan. 3` O.C. Ficus pumila Creeping Fig 5 gal Low 54 Space per Plan. 4` O.C. Prunus ilicifolia lyonii Catalina Cherry 15 gal Low 102 Space per Plan Sedum pachyphyllum Stonecrop 5 gal Low 212 Plant per Plan 0 10 21 32 feet 3/32" = 1'-0" NORTH SHEET NUMBER PROJECT NUMBER L-2.0 SEED GROUP, INC. IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF REPRODUCTIONS OF THIS DOCUMENT GENERATED BY OTHERS FROM ELECTRONIC MEDIA. NOT PUBLISHED. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 9

Unauthorized changes will constitute a breach of Contract. NOTE TO ALL: No changes shall be made to these plans or specifications without prior approval from the Architect. 24'-6" 3'-0" 12'-1" 1'-3" 10'-1" 1'-1" 11'-1" 10'-1" 24'-6" 1'-0" 23'-8" MAX. PROPOSED PLATE HEIGHT 27'-9" MAX. PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT 11'-1" 3'-6" 3'-6" 10'-1" SETBACK SETBACK SIA ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN t.o. parapet t.o. roof sht'g t.o. guardrail t.o. sht'g @ second flr. +309.33' t.o. slab @ first flr. +323.50' +320.50' +296.00' +323.50' +321.50' +320.50' +309.33' +296.00' t.o. highest parapet t.o. roof sht'g t.o. sht'g @ second flr. t.o. slab @ first flr. 12'-1" 1'-3" 10'-1" 1'-1" +295.73' average grade around ext'g house EAST / FRONT ELEVATION - 1" = 10' t.o. parapet t.o. guardrail Permit Date P r o j e c t Beverly Drive Residence 524 N Beverly Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 Owner 20230 Wells Drive Woodland Hills, CA 91364 t: 818-704-0667 f: 818-704-0760 www.siaarchdesign.com EAST / FRONT ELEVATION c 2010 SIA All designs, ideas, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by this drawing are owned by, and are the property of the SIA and were created, evolved and developed for use on, and in connection with the specified project. Arrangements or plans shall neither be used on any other work nor be disclosed to any other person, firm or corporation for any use whatsoever without written permission of SIA. SIA and/or its principals and employees waives any and all liability or responsibility for problems that may occur when these plans, drawings, specifications, and/or designs are followed without the professionals guidance with ambiguities, or conflicts which are alleged. Alta Standadrd I 113 N San Vicenete Blvd. Suite 300 Beverly Hills CA 90211 11/11/16 scale: 1" = 10'-0" prepared by: M.D. job #: 2016-247 A-2.1

Unauthorized changes will constitute a breach of Contract. NOTE TO ALL: No changes shall be made to these plans or specifications without prior approval from the Architect. 24'-6" 3'-0" 12'-1" 1'-3" 10'-1" 1'-1" 11'-1" 10'-1" 24'-6" 1'-0" 23'-8" MAX. PROPOSED PLATE HEIGHT 27'-9" MAX. PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT 11'-1" 3'-6" 3'-6" 10'-1" SETBACK SETBACK SIA ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN t.o. parapet t.o. roof sht'g t.o. guardrail t.o. sht'g @ second flr. +309.33' t.o. slab @ first flr. +323.50' +320.50' +296.00' +323.50' +321.50' +320.50' +309.33' +296.00' t.o. highest parapet t.o. roof sht'g t.o. sht'g @ second flr. t.o. slab @ first flr. 12'-1" 1'-3" 10'-1" 1'-1" +295.73' average grade around ext'g house WEST / REAR ELEVATION - 1" = 10' t.o. parapet t.o. guardrail Permit Date P r o j e c t Beverly Drive Residence 524 N Beverly Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 Owner 20230 Wells Drive Woodland Hills, CA 91364 t: 818-704-0667 f: 818-704-0760 www.siaarchdesign.com WEST / REAR ELEVATION c 2010 SIA All designs, ideas, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by this drawing are owned by, and are the property of the SIA and were created, evolved and developed for use on, and in connection with the specified project. Arrangements or plans shall neither be used on any other work nor be disclosed to any other person, firm or corporation for any use whatsoever without written permission of SIA. SIA and/or its principals and employees waives any and all liability or responsibility for problems that may occur when these plans, drawings, specifications, and/or designs are followed without the professionals guidance with ambiguities, or conflicts which are alleged. Alta Standadrd I 113 N San Vicenete Blvd. Suite 300 Beverly Hills CA 90211 11/11/16 scale: 1" = 10'-0" prepared by: M.D. job #: 2016-247 A-2.2

NOTE TO ALL: No changes shall be made to these plans or specifications without prior approval from the Architect. SIA 27'-9" MAX. PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT 23'-8" MAX. PROPOSED PLATE HEIGHT 24'-6" 1'-0" 9'-1" 10'-1" 12'-1" 1'-3" 10'-1" 1'-1" 24'-6" 3'-0" Permit Date P r o j e c t Beverly Drive Residence 524 N Beverly Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 Unauthorized changes will constitute a breach of Contract. 10'-1" 3'-6" 3'-6" 10'-1" SETBACK SETBACK 12'-1" 1'-3" 10'-1" 1'-1" +295.73' average grade around ext'g house ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN t.o. highest parapet t.o. parapet t.o. roof sht'g t.o. guardrail t.o. sht'g @ second flr. t.o. slab @ first flr. +323.50' +321.50' +320.50' +309.33' +296.00' +323.50' +320.50' +309.33' +296.00' t.o. roof sht'g t.o. sht'g @ second flr. NORTH / RIGHT ELEVATION - 1" = 10' t.o. parapet t.o. guardrail t.o. slab @ first flr. Owner 20230 Wells Drive Woodland Hills, CA 91364 t: 818-704-0667 f: 818-704-0760 www.siaarchdesign.com NORTH / RIGHT ELEVATION c 2010 SIA All designs, ideas, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by this drawing are owned by, and are the property of the SIA and were created, evolved and developed for use on, and in connection with the specified project. Arrangements or plans shall neither be used on any other work nor be disclosed to any other person, firm or corporation for any use whatsoever without written permission of SIA. SIA and/or its principals and employees waives any and all liability or responsibility for problems that may occur when these plans, drawings, specifications, and/or designs are followed without the professionals guidance with ambiguities, or conflicts which are alleged. Alta Standadrd I 113 N San Vicenete Blvd. Suite 300 Beverly Hills CA 90211 11/11/16 scale: 1" = 10'-0" prepared by: M.D. job #: 2016-247 A-2.3

Unauthorized changes will constitute a breach of Contract. NOTE TO ALL: No changes shall be made to these plans or specifications without prior approval from the Architect. 24'-6" 3'-0" 12'-1" 1'-3" 10'-1" 1'-1" 11'-1" 10'-1" 3'-6" 3'-6" 10'-1" 10'-1" 12'-1" 1'-3" 10'-1" 1'-1" 3'-0" 23'-8" MAX. PROPOSED PLATE HEIGHT 27'-9" MAX. PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT SETBACK SIA ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN t.o. parapet t.o. roof sht'g t.o. guardrail t.o. sht'g @ second flr. t.o. slab @ first flr. +323.50' +320.50' +309.33' +296.00' +323.50' t.o. highest parapet +320.50' +309.33' t.o. sht'g @ second flr. SOUTH / LEFT ELEVATION - 1" = 10' +296.00' t.o. roof sht'g t.o. guardrail t.o. slab @ first flr. +295.73' average grade around ext'g house Permit Date P r o j e c t Beverly Drive Residence 524 N Beverly Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 Owner 20230 Wells Drive Woodland Hills, CA 91364 t: 818-704-0667 f: 818-704-0760 www.siaarchdesign.com SOUTH / LEFT ELEVATION c 2010 SIA All designs, ideas, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by this drawing are owned by, and are the property of the SIA and were created, evolved and developed for use on, and in connection with the specified project. Arrangements or plans shall neither be used on any other work nor be disclosed to any other person, firm or corporation for any use whatsoever without written permission of SIA. SIA and/or its principals and employees waives any and all liability or responsibility for problems that may occur when these plans, drawings, specifications, and/or designs are followed without the professionals guidance with ambiguities, or conflicts which are alleged. Alta Standadrd I 113 N San Vicenete Blvd. Suite 300 Beverly Hills CA 90211 11/11/16 scale: 1" = 10'-0" prepared by: M.D. job #: 2016-247 A-2.4

Unauthorized changes will constitute a breach of Contract. NOTE TO ALL: No changes shall be made to these plans or specifications without prior approval from the Architect. SIA ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN Metal Trim, Painted DE 6378 "JET" (Typ.) Gray Rough Barn Wood (Typ.) Smooth Stucco, Painted DEW 380 "WHITE" (Typ.) Wrought Iron Balcony Guardrail, Painted DE 6378 "JET" (Typ.) Fleetwood Steel Doors and Windows, in DE 6371 "Black Jack" (Typ.) Dark Gray Wood Stain (Typ.) Metal Trim, Painted DE 6378 "JET" (Typ.) Gray Rough Barn Wood (Typ.) Smooth Stucco, Painted DE 6375 "CASTEL ROCK" (Typ.) Fleetwood Steel Doors and Windows, in DE 6371 "Black Jack" (Typ.) Wrought Iron Balcony Guardrail, Painted DE 6378 "JET" (Typ.) Smooth Stucco, Painted DE 6377 "BOAT ANCHOR" (Typ.) YLighting, Modern Forms Urban Outdoor Aluminum Lights, "Urban 22in Outdoor Wall Light" (Typ.) COLOR EAST / FRONT ELEVATION - 1" = 10' Permit Date P r o j e c t Beverly Drive Residence 524 N Beverly Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 Owner 20230 Wells Drive Woodland Hills, CA 91364 t: 818-704-0667 f: 818-704-0760 www.siaarchdesign.com COLOR EAST / FRONT ELEVATION c 2010 SIA All designs, ideas, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by this drawing are owned by, and are the property of the SIA and were created, evolved and developed for use on, and in connection with the specified project. Arrangements or plans shall neither be used on any other work nor be disclosed to any other person, firm or corporation for any use whatsoever without written permission of SIA. SIA and/or its principals and employees waives any and all liability or responsibility for problems that may occur when these plans, drawings, specifications, and/or designs are followed without the professionals guidance with ambiguities, or conflicts which are alleged. Alta Standadrd I 113 N San Vicenete Blvd. Suite 300 Beverly Hills CA 90211 11/11/16 scale: 1" = 10'-0" prepared by: M.D. job #: 2016-247 A-2.5

NOTE TO ALL: No changes shall be made to these plans or specifications without prior approval from the Architect. SIA EXISTING STREET VIEW Permit Date P r o j e c t Beverly Drive Residence 524 N Beverly Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 Unauthorized changes will constitute a breach of Contract. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN Owner 20230 Wells Drive Woodland Hills, CA 91364 t: 818-704-0667 f: 818-704-0760 www.siaarchdesign.com c 2010 SIA All designs, ideas, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by this drawing are owned by, and are the property of the SIA and were created, evolved and developed for use on, and in connection with the specified project. Arrangements or plans shall neither be used on any other work nor be disclosed to any other person, firm or corporation for any use whatsoever without written permission of SIA. SIA and/or its principals and employees waives any and all liability or responsibility for problems that may occur when these plans, drawings, specifications, and/or designs are followed without the professionals guidance with ambiguities, or conflicts which are alleged. Alta Standadrd I 113 N San Vicenete Blvd. Suite 300 Beverly Hills CA 90211 STREET VIEW PHOTO MONTAGE 11/11/16 scale: prepared by: M.D. job #: 2016-247 PROPOSED STREET VIEW A-5.2

Unauthorized changes will constitute a breach of Contract. NOTE TO ALL: No changes shall be made to these plans or specifications without prior approval from the Architect. SIA ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN Permit Date P r o j e c t Beverly Drive Residence 524 N Beverly Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 Owner 20230 Wells Drive Woodland Hills, CA 91364 t: 818-704-0667 f: 818-704-0760 www.siaarchdesign.com c 2010 SIA All designs, ideas, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by this drawing are owned by, and are the property of the SIA and were created, evolved and developed for use on, and in connection with the specified project. Arrangements or plans shall neither be used on any other work nor be disclosed to any other person, firm or corporation for any use whatsoever without written permission of SIA. SIA and/or its principals and employees waives any and all liability or responsibility for problems that may occur when these plans, drawings, specifications, and/or designs are followed without the professionals guidance with ambiguities, or conflicts which are alleged. Alta Standadrd I 113 N San Vicenete Blvd. Suite 300 Beverly Hills CA 90211 COLOR RENDERINGS 11/11/16 scale: prepared by: M.D. job #: 2016-247 A-5.3

Attachment C DRAFT Approval Resolution Design Review Commission Report 524 North Beverly Drive December 5, 2016

RESOLUTION NO. DR XX-16 RESOLUTION OF THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS CONDITIONALLY APPROVING AN R- 1 DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW TWO-STORY SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE AT THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 524 NORTH BEVERLY DRIVE. The Design Review Commission of the City of Beverly Hills hereby finds, resolves and determines as follows: Section 1. SIA Architectural Design Inc., agent, on behalf of Alta Standard I, property owner (Collectively the Applicant ), has applied for an R-1 Design Review Permit for design approval of a new two-story single-family residence for the property located at 524 North Beverly Drive which is located in the city s Central R-1 Zone. Section 2. Beverly Hills Municipal Code Article 44, Chapter 3 of Title 10, authorizes the Design Review Commission the authority to approve, approve with conditions or deny design-related aspects of projects located in the city s Central R-1 zone, subject to findings set forth in Beverly Municipal Code Section 10-3-4415. Section 3. The subject project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA Public Resources Code 21000 21178), pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines in that the project includes the review of building design, colors and materials to the façade of the building, front yard landscaping or minor low-scaled accessory structures, such as fences or walls. It can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the subject activity could result in a significant effect on the environment. Additionally, since the property has not been designed by an architect listed on the City s Master Architect List nor has it been listed on the City s Historic Resource Survey, it does Page 1 of 6

not warrant further review as a potential historical resource. It can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the subject activity could result in a significant effect on the environment. Section 4. The Design Review Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on December 5, 2016, at which time oral and documentary evidence was received concerning the application. Section 5. Based upon the evidence presented at the hearings, including the staff report(s), oral and written testimony, the Design Review Commission hereby finds as follows with respect to the R- 1 Design Review Permit: A. The proposed development s design exhibits an internally compatible design scheme in that the project s proportions, form, fenestration, scale, mass, color and materials are representative of the architectural style and design scheme chosen for the building. These design elements, including existing or proposed landscaping, paving, or perimeter fencing or walls are internally compatible and consistent with the overall design. B. The proposed development s design appropriately minimizes the appearance of scale and mass and enhances the garden like quality of the city and appropriately maximizes the use of required open space within the proposed architectural style. Specifically, the project, as conditioned, complies with applicable provisions of the municipal code that regulate overall building size, height, scale and mass. Additionally, the building provides appropriate building modulation and uses window and other design components that minimize the visual bulk and mass. The garden quality of the city is maintained through appropriately proportioned paving in the required front yard and with the incorporation of existing or proposed plant material of appropriate sizes that complement the architectural style and help reduce overall mass and scale. Page 2 of 6

C. The proposed development will enhance the appearance of the neighborhood in that the new construction has been designed in context to the appearance, mass and scale of adjacent properties and other properties in the neighborhood. The project includes the use of high quality building materials and appropriately uses colors and design ornamentation that is appropriate to the neighborhood. Existing or new planting will promote the garden quality image and appearance of the city, consistent with city goals and existing mature landscaping in the neighborhood. D. The proposed development is designed to balance the reasonable expectation of development for the owner with the reasonable expectation of privacy of neighbors. The City s zoning regulations set forth maximum building height and mass standards with which this project, as conditioned, conforms. The project is being constructed in an urbanized environment and has other adjacent and nearby residences. To provide a reasonable expectation of privacy, the Design Review Commission, reviewed the placement of windows on the subject and adjacent properties, considered the location of private outdoor areas and evaluated the projects proposed and neighbors existing landscaping. Accordingly, based on this review, and as conditioned by this resolution, the project balances reasonable expectations for privacy and development. E. The proposed development respects prevailing site design patterns, carefully analyzing the characteristics of the surrounding group of homes, and integrates appropriate features that will ensure harmony between old and new. Specifically, the project has been designed with an internally compatible architectural theme and is modulated in a manner that respects privacy and scale of development to adjacent properties. The project design, proportionality and landscaping is compatible with other properties in the general vicinity and the project reinforces a cohesive streetscape. In its review the Page 3 of 6

Design Review Commission carefully studied the proposed project in context to adjacent properties and conducted individual site inspections or reviewed photographs of the surrounding group of homes. Section 6. Based on the foregoing, the Design Review Commission hereby grants the request defined in this resolution subject to the following conditions: Project Specific Conditions No project-specific conditions are proposed. Standard Conditions 1. Design Approval. Project approval is for the design-related aspects of the project only. No approval is implied or granted with regard to applicable city zoning or technical codes, which may require review and approval from other city commissions or officials. 2. Compliance with Municipal Code. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall demonstrate compliance with all applicable provisions of the city s municipal code and applicable conditions imposed by any discretionary review approval. 3. Compliance with Special Conditions. Any special conditions that require approval by the director of community development, or designee, shall be submitted to the staff liaison to the commission within fourteen (14) days of approval or prior to submittal of the plan check review application, whichever is greater. 4. Project Rendering. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall incorporate into the building permit set of plans, an updated color rendering of all building facades that are visible from the public street. The quality and detail of the rendering shall be subject to approval from the Director Page 4 of 6

of Community Development, or designee, and shall include sufficient design information to evaluate project compliance during construction. 5. Approval Resolution. A copy of the signed resolution of approval shall be scanned onto the cover sheet(s) of the building permit set of plans. 6. Substantial Compliance with Approved Plans. The director of community development, or designee, shall determine if changes to the approved project are in substantial compliance with the commission s action. This determination shall be subject to applicable fees and charges. A substantial modification to the approved project requires approval from the Design Review Commission. 7. Covenant Recording. This resolution approving an R-1 Design Review Permit shall not become effective until the owner of the Project site records a covenant, satisfactory in form and content to the City Attorney, accepting the conditions of approval set forth in this resolution. The covenant shall include a copy of the resolution as an exhibit. The Applicant shall deliver the executed covenant to the Department of Community Development within 60 days of the Planning Commission decision. At the time that the Applicant delivers the covenant to the City, the Applicant shall also provide the City with all fees necessary to record the document with the County Recorder. If the Applicant fails to deliver the executed covenant within the required 60 days, this resolution approving the Project shall be null and void and of no further effect. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Director of Community Development may, upon a request by the Applicant, grant a waiver from the 60-day time limit if, at the time of the request, the Director determines that there have been no substantial changes to any federal, state, or local law that would affect the Project. 8. Validity of Permits. The rights granted by this approval shall remain valid for three (3) years from the date of approval, unless extended pursuant to Beverly Hills Municipal Code Section 10-3-207. Page 5 of 6

9. Appeals. Decisions of the Design Review Commission may be appealed to the Planning Commission within fourteen (14) days of the final action by filing a written appeal and paying appropriate fees with the City Clerk. Section 7. The Secretary of the Design Review Commission shall certify to the passage, approval, and adoption of this resolution, and shall cause this resolution and its certification to be entered in the administrative record maintained by the community development department. Section 8. Decisions of the Design Review Commission may be appealed to the Planning Commission within fourteen (14) days of the final action by filling a written appeal and paying appropriate fees with the City of Beverly Hills City Clerk. Approved as to Form and Content: Adopted: December 5, 2016 Mark Odell, Urban Designer Community Development Department Ilene Nathan, Chair Design Review Commission Page 6 of 6