Soil modelling in Paratie

Similar documents
Soil-Structure Interaction of a Piled Raft Foundation in Clay a 3D Numerical Study

Dam Construction by Stages

Slope stability assessment

Advanced Foundation Engineering. Sheet-Pile Walls

Piles subject to excavation-induced soil movement in clay

Shear Strength of Soils

GEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE

RESPONSE OF ANCHOR IN TWO-PHASE MATERIAL UNDER UPLIFT

Bearing Capacity Theory. Bearing Capacity

1 Introduction. 2 General Pile Analysis Features. 2.1 Pile Internal Forces and Displacements

EAT 212 SOIL MECHANICS

Compaction. Compaction purposes and processes. Compaction as a construction process

This document downloaded from vulcanhammer.net vulcanhammer.info Chet Aero Marine

PULLOUT CAPACITY OF HORIZONTAL AND INCLINED PLATE ANCHORS IN CLAYEY SOILS

EFFECT OF COMPACTION ON THE UNSATURATED SHEAR STRENGTH OF A COMPACTED TILL

Compressibility and One Dimensional Consolidation of Soil

SOIL MIX Belgian research activities SOIL MIX PROJECT IWT

Rapid Drawdown with Multi-Stage

Effect of pile sleeve opening and length below seabed on the bearing capacity of offshore jacket mudmats

Field tests on the lateral capacity of poles embedded in Auckland residual clay

Global Journal of Engineering Science and Research Management

Consolidation Stress Effect On Strength Of Lime Stabilized Soil

Effect of Placement of Footing on Stability of Slope

The University of Iowa Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering SOIL MECHANICS 53:030 Final Examination 2 Hours, 200 points

REDISTRIBUTION OF LOAD CARRIED BY SOIL UNDERNEATH PILED RAFT FOUNDATIONS DUE TO PILE SPACING AND GROUNDWATER AS WELL AS ECCENTRICITY

Analysis of Pullout Resistance of Soil-Nailing in Lateritic Soil

Problems with Testing Peat for Stability Analysis

CHAPTER 8 SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS

Stability of Inclined Strip Anchors in Purely Cohesive Soil

Finite Element Methods against Limit Equilibrium Approaches for Slope Stability Analysis

Development of Bearing Capacity Factor in Clay Soil with Normalized Undrained Shear Strength Behavior using The Finite Element Method

Stress-Strain and Strength Behavior of Undrained Organic Soil in Kupondol, Kathmandu

vulcanhammer.net Visit our companion site

A STUDY ON LOAD CAPACITY OF HORIZONTAL AND INCLINED PLATE ANCHORS IN SANDY SOILS

EFFECT OF BOLT CONNECTION OF SQUARE-SHAPED GEOCELL MODEL ON PULLOUT TEST RESULTS

CiSTUP Indian Institute of Science Bangalore

EFFECT OF COIR GEOTEXTILE AS REINFORCEMENT ON THE LOAD SETTLEMENT CHARACHTERISTICS OF WEAK SUBGRADE

Advanced Foundation Engineering. Introduction

Reinforcement with Geosynthetics

Numerical Analysis of the Bearing Capacity of Strip Footing Adjacent to Slope

PILE FOUNDATIONS CONTENTS: 1.0 Introduction. 1.1 Choice of pile type Driven (displacement) piles Bored (replacement) piles. 2.

THE PERFORMANCE OF STRENGTHENING SLOPE USING SHOTCRETE AND ANCHOR BY FINITE ELEMENT METHOD (FEM)

A comparison of numerical algorithms in the analysis of pile reinforced slopes

ScienceDirect. The Undrained Shear Strength of Overconsolidated Clays

EFFECT OF CENTRAL PILE IN INCREASING THE BEARING CAPACITY OF BORED PILE GROUPS

DEPTH OF EMBEDMENT OF A SHEET PILE WALL

LABORATORY STUDY ON THE CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT OF CLAY-FILLED GEOTEXTILE TUBE AND BAGS

Seismic Influence of Homogeneous Soil on RCC Building

DRAFT ONONDAGA LAKE CAPPING AND DREDGE AREA AND DEPTH INITIAL DESIGN SUBMITTAL H.3 STATIC SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSES

BAUER Soil Improvement

Mechanical Behavior of Soil Geotextile Composites: Effect of Soil Type

Experimental investigation and theoretical modelling of soft soils from mining deposits

GEOTEXTILE DEFORMATION ANALYSIS OF GEOSYNTHETIC CLAY LINERS WITH FEM

Stability analysis of slopes with surcharge by LEM and FEM

ISO/TS TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION. Geotechnical investigation and testing Laboratory testing of soil Part 10: Direct shear tests

SOIL FOUNDATION IMPROVEMENT WITH TIRE-USED TO REDUCE SETTLEMENT OF SHALLOW FOUNDATION EMBEDDED ON SATURATED DEPOK CLAY

4 Slope Stabilization Using EPS Geofoam at Route 23A

Design of Unpaved Roads A Geotechnical Perspective

Shear strength features of unsaturated clayey sand by lab test

Undrained shear strength in the assessment of slope stability of water defenses

TECHNICAL. Design Guide. Retaining walls made easy with this beautiful solution EARTH RETAINING WALLS

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON PULL-OUT CAPACITY OF HELICAL PILE IN CLAYEY SOIL

Experimental tests for geosynthetics anchorage trenches

Autodesk Moldflow Insight AMI Molding Window Analysis

Behavior of single pile adjacent to slope embedded in reinforced sand under lateral load

Full Scale Model Test of Soil Reinforcement on Soft Soil Deposition with Inclined Timber Pile

Tools to facilitate the use of Soil Maps in Emilia-Romagna region (Italy) Paola Tarocco

Soil-atmosphere interaction in unsaturated cut slopes

ISO/TS TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION

THE ULTIMATE SKIN RESISTANCE OF CONCRETE PILE IN PARTIALLY SATURATED COHESIVE SOIL BY MODIFIED Β METHOD

Performance Comparison of Hydronic Secondary Loop Heat Pump and Conventional Air-Source Heat Pump ABSTRACT 1. INTRODUCTION

Laboratory Tests to Determine Shear Strength of Soils

TIRUCHIRAPALLI

Swelling Treatment By Using Sand for Tamia Swelling Soil

200i/KN2, KN4 Firmware Revision Sheet

SUITABILITY OF GEOGRID REINFORCED - RUBBER WASTE IN PAVEMENTS

GEOMEMBRANE FIELD INSTALLATION

A Review on Pull-Out Capacity of Helical Anchors in Clay And Sand

Lightweight aggregates in Civil Engineering applications. Arnstein Watn Senior Scientist, SINTEF

Sea to Sky Geotechnique 2006

NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF VERTICAL UPLIFT RESISTANCE OF HORIZONTAL STRIP ANCHOR EMBEDDED IN COHESIVE FRICTIONAL WEIGHTLESS SOIL

Foundation Technologies for Offshore Shallow Water Renewable Energy Projects

Modelling of Non-linear Shear Displacement Behaviour of Soil Geotextile Interface

[Gupta* et al., 5(7): July, 2016] ISSN: IC Value: 3.00 Impact Factor: 4.116

Seabed Soil Classification, Soil behaviour and Pipeline design N. I. Thusyanthan, Cape Group Pte Ltd

1. RETAINING WALL SELECTION PROCEDURE

APPENDIX D. Slope Stability Analysis Results for Soil and Overburden Storage Mounds

Installer Manual KNX Touchscreen Thermostat

COHESIONLESS SOIL PROPERTIES IMPROVEMENT USING BENTONITE

The Drying Behavior of a Disturbed Soft Clay

1 SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION

LAB 8. FIGURE L8.1 A rock sculpted by wind erosion in the Altiplano region of Bolivia. FIGURE L8.2 A dust storm in Casa Grande, Arizona

Spatial variation of soil properties

This document downloaded from vulcanhammer.net vulcanhammer.info Chet Aero Marine

Performance of Geosynthetics in the Filtration of High Water Content Waste Material

Managing Network Alarms and Events

Pipe-soil interaction for submarine pipelines

Loading unsaturated soil. *Mohamed Abdellatif Ali Albarqawy 1)

Compression of Fins pipe and simple Heat pipe Using CFD

EFFECT OF NATURAL GEOTEXTILE ON UNPAVED AND PAVED ROAD MODELS- A COMPARATIVE STUDY

Transcription:

Soil modelling in Paratie The next document contains any information and direction to follow in Paratie Plus in order to configure different soil constitutive models. Here is a comparison with Paratie 7.0 controls. Refer to the following table: The following soil consitutive models are available in Paratie (both in the previous versions and in Paratie Plus): Written by Geotechnical-Structural Staff of Harpaceas 1

Granular soil constituve model (always drained conditions) Coesive soil consitutive model (drained or undrained conditions) using effective stresses ESP. Coesive soil consitutive model (undrained conditions) using total stresses ESP. Drained conditions for granular soil In Paratie 7.0 the user chose the kind of soil in the soil eindow. To use granular soil it was enough to select sand. Choosing a sand soil the supposed behaviour was always drained. Written by Geotechnical-Structural Staff of Harpaceas 2

Selecting a sand soil it was possible to chose among three different options: 1. Give two modulus Evc e Eur (elastic vergin compression modulus and elastic unload-reload modulus) constant with depth. 2. Consider elastic modulus variable with depth and depending on external pressure. 3. Give directly Winkler stiffnessr In a similar way the user can set the same options in Paratie Plus: Written by Geotechnical-Structural Staff of Harpaceas 3

Silt and rock soils are modelled like a sand soil. Selecting then silt or rock only conventional analysis results are affected and, using rock, the embedment check in non-linear analysis. Coesive soil Drained and undrained conditions Selecting Clay in Paratie 7.0, the cohesive soil consitutive model is activated. The same is in Paratie Plus: Selecting a Clay constitutitive model the user can choose to consider the soil drained or undained and to use an ESP or TSP model. (cfr Theory manual) The following table summarizes every possible cofiguration: Written by Geotechnical-Structural Staff of Harpaceas 4

A B MODEL DRAINED UNDRAINED 1 ESP (Effective stress path) YES YES 2 TSP (Total stress path) NO YES Configurations A 1 e B-1 (ESP MODEL): Select the initial behaviour: Written by Geotechnical-Structural Staff of Harpaceas 5

If necessary the user can modify stage by stage clays behaviour through this window: When the user modifies clays behaviour under Analysis menu, the changes regard both uphill and downhill ground, for the actual stage. Selecting Default the behaviour will be the one defined in the Edit sol tipe data window. To distinguish between uphill and downhill ground behaviour use the Written by Geotechnical-Structural Staff of Harpaceas 6

option Model/Advanced/Change soil Properties: Configure ESP before starting the analysis: In Paratie Plus it is a default option. The ESP costitutive model allows to change the soil behaviour from drained to undrained (and vice versa) during any stage. If an ESP model has been chosen the parameters in the red frame ( in the following figure ) are not to be considered. Written by Geotechnical-Structural Staff of Harpaceas 7

The Su parameter in ESP model is not essential, it is used as external border of the elasto-plastic field (refer to the documents included into the installation folder or page 14). Written by Geotechnical-Structural Staff of Harpaceas 8

This parameters are ignored by the ESP model. Elastic modulus used are the same of the sand model.. Configurations B-2 e B-1 (TSP MODEL): Under Analysis menu it s possible to set TSP model: Written by Geotechnical-Structural Staff of Harpaceas 9

Selecting the option in the red frame, the yellow window will be updated: TSP model has one plain limit: it is impossible to turn from an undrained to a drained condition (effective stresses are lost). So, in order to analyze a model composed by n drained stages and following m undrained stages (THIS is possible), the user can select the same functions senn for the ESP model: Written by Geotechnical-Structural Staff of Harpaceas 10

and in all m undrained stages: If, after an undrained stage, a drained stage is setted the model will surely collaps! The solver launches, for the first n drained stages, th ESP model and then the used soil elastic modulus will be: The soil elastic modulus used for the m undrained stages will be: Written by Geotechnical-Structural Staff of Harpaceas 11

During the undrained steps, S u has now an essential role if a TSP model has been chosen. Written by Geotechnical-Structural Staff of Harpaceas 12

COMPARISON BETWEEN CLAY ESP MODEL IN PARATIE 7.0 AND PARATIE PLUS Written by Geotechnical-Structural Staff of Harpaceas 13

Stages: Overconsolidation Drained Geostatic step Drained 1 excavation Undrained Tieback Undrained 2 excavation Undrained Long term Drained Written by Geotechnical-Structural Staff of Harpaceas 14

Su has been setted as 400 kpa; this means NOT to consider it; that is to put a very far from the boundary limit to the elasto-plastic field. In fact in Paratie 7.0, when the user selected disable: the parameter was brought to a very high value. This option (disable) is no longer available in Paratie Plus, because Su could be used by the conventional analysis. The measure than is to force a high value (write 400kPa). Written by Geotechnical-Structural Staff of Harpaceas 15

2 STAGE excavation DISPLACEMENTS Deflection L.T. Deflection Written by Geotechnical-Structural Staff of Harpaceas 16

2 STAGE excavation MOMENTS Moment (kn L.T. Moment (kn Written by Geotechnical-Structural Staff of Harpaceas 17

COMPARISON BETWEEN CLAY TSP MODEL IN PARATIE 7.0 AND PARATIE PLUS Consider now the same model seen before: this will be analysez using a TSP model. The last drained stage must be removed (using a TSP model it is impossible to turn from undrained to drained behaviour). The essencial parameters for TSP model are: Su Eu (or kwu) Then: Written by Geotechnical-Structural Staff of Harpaceas 18

Stages: Drained Overconsolidation Geostatic step Undrained 1 excavation Undrained Tieback Undrained 2 excavation Undrained Written by Geotechnical-Structural Staff of Harpaceas 19

STAGE Tieback DISPLACEMENTS Deflection 2 excavation Deflection Written by Geotechnical-Structural Staff of Harpaceas 20

STAGE Tieback MOMENTS Moment (kn 2 excavation Moment (kn Written by Geotechnical-Structural Staff of Harpaceas 21