POLICY AMENDMENT AND LAND USE AMENDMENT KILLARNEY/GLENGARRY (WARD 8) NW CORNER OF RICHMOND ROAD AND 33 STREET SW BYLAWS 1P2015 AND 7D2015

Similar documents
ROAD CLOSURE AND LAND USE AMENDMENT SILVER SPRINGS (WARD 1) NORTHEAST OF NOSEHILL DRIVE NW AND SILVER SPRINGS ROAD NW BYLAWS 2C2018 AND 29D2018

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2018 January 25. That Calgary Planning Commission recommend APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

POLICY AMENDMENT AND LAND USE AMENDMENT TUXEDO PARK (WARD 9) CENTRE STREET N AND 26 AVENUE NE BYLAWS 36P2017 AND 234D2017

Land Use Amendment in Southwood (Ward 11) at and Elbow Drive SW, LOC

LAND USE AMENDMENT CORNERSTONE (WARD 3) 60 STREET NE AND COUNTRY HILLS BOULEVARD NE MAP 26NE BYLAW 22D2017

An amendment to the Bridgeland-Riverside Area Redevelopment Plan is required to allow for the proposed redesignation.

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2017 June 15. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

LAND USE AMENDMENT CORNERSTONE (WARD 3) COUNTRY HILLS BOULEVARD AND STONEY TRAIL NE BYLAW 9D2017

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION 2016 November 03. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

This application has been applied for with support of an Outline Plan to provide the technical details for the site s development.

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2016 November 03. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

LAND USE AMENDMENT DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL CORE (WARD 7) MACLEOD TRAIL SE AND 5 AVENUE SE BYLAW 254D2017

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2017 February 09. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

CONTENTS 8.0 LAND USE 8.1 GENERAL LAND USE 8.2 RESIDENTIAL 8.3 MIXED USE 8.4 COMMERCIAL 8.5 EMPLOYMENT LANDS

Mill Woods Town Centre Proposed Rezoning LDA

Outline Plan in Belvedere (Ward 9) at Street SE, LOC (OP)

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF New Street Burlington, ON

Local Growth Planning in North Central Green Line Communities

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF. 2136&2148 Trafalgar Road. Town of Oakville

Arbour Lake Development Application

1.0 Purpose of a Secondary Plan for the Masonville Transit Village

Commercial Development Proposal Tenth Line Road. Planning Rationale Report. Minto Developments Inc.

Edward R. Sajecki Commissioner of Planning and Building. Land Use Review- Former Parkway Belt West Lands- Fieldgate Drive and Audubon Boulevard

SECTION E. Realizing the Plan

FORMER CANADIAN FORCES BASE (CFB) ROCKCLIFFE SECONDARY PLAN. Official Plan Amendment XX to the Official Plan for the City of Ottawa

ELMVALE ACRES SHOPPING CENTRE MASTER PLAN

2136 & 2148 Trafalgar Road Town of Oakville Region of Halton

GUIDELINES. Transit Oriented Development. Approved by Edmonton City Council on February 15, 2012 in tandem with City Policy C565

4780 Eglinton Avenue West - Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications - Preliminary Report

NEW CASTLE COUNTY S ZONING DISTRICTS

178 Carruthers Properties Inc.

DRAFT Northeast Quadrant of Kipling Avenue and Highway 7 DRAFT AUGUST 29, Goals Land Use. The goals of this Plan are to:

Mark-up of the effect of the proposed Bronte Village Growth Area OPA No.18 on the text of section 24, Bronte Village, of the Livable Oakville Plan

ONTARIO MUNICIPAL BOARD

393, 395, 397, 399, 401 and 403 Spring Garden Avenue Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application Preliminary Report

JASPER PLACE. Area Redevelopment Plan

TOWN OF BRUDERHEIM Report to the capital region board

Urban Design Brief 1576 Richmond Street City of London

March 21, 2018 ALCA Meeting. March 21, 2018

and services The protection and conservation of environmentally significant and sensitive natural heritage features and functions.

Agenda. 7 Wright Crescent Urban Design Study. Public Meeting and Urban Design Workshop. 1 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND (City of Kingston)

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF URBAN DESIGN BRIEF 721 FRANKLIN BLVD, CAMBRIDGE August 2018

Queen Street West - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

11.4 Highway 400 North Employment Lands Secondary Plan APPROVED BY THE ONTARIO MUNICIPAL BOARD ON NOVEMBER 21, 2011

6 PORT SYDNEY SETTLEMENT AREA

KANATA CENTRUM 255 KANATA AVENUE OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT

City of Grande Prairie Development Services Department

Highland Village Green Design Guidelines

Regency Developments. Urban Design Brief. Holyrood DC2 Rezoning

AWH REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT

Edward R. Sajecki Commissioner of Planning and Building

REZONING GUIDE. Zone Map Amendment (Rezoning) - Application. Rezoning Application Page 1 of 3. Return completed form to

Bloor St. W. Rezoning - Preliminary Report

PLANNING RATIONALE 3843 INNES ROAD, ORLEANS 78 UNITS CONDOMINIUM PROJECT MELKART DEVELOPMENTS Inc.

RECOMMENDATION(S) OF THE CALGARY PLANNING COMMISSION

PORT WHITBY COMMUNITY

Welcome. Walk Around. Talk to Us. Write Down Your Comments

THE CITY OF VAUGHAN BY-LAW BY-LAW NUMBER A By-law to adopt Amendment Number 1 to the Official Plan of the Vaughan Planning Area.

420 FANSHAWE PARK ROAD EAST London, ON

CHAPTER 5: GUIDING PRINCIPLES

BENSON / HUNT TERTIARY PLAN

Westwind Developments Ltd. PIONEER LANDS AREA STRUCTURE PLAN - PROPOSED AMENDMENT

Municipal Development Plan. Summer Village of ROCHON SANDS. Bylaw #241-18

8 Oak Street - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

1071 King Street West Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

646 Kingston Road - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

Urban Design Brief December 23, 2015 Southside Construction Group Official Plan & Zoning By-Law Amendment

Appendix C: Interim Mixed-Use Evaluation Criteria

SUMMER VILLAGE OF SUNRISE BEACH

Official Plan Review

11.4 Highway 400 North Employment Lands Secondary Plan

Broadview Avenue Zoning Amendment Application Final Report

Edward R. Sajecki Commissioner of Planning and Building. Region of Halton Proposed Regional Official Plan Amendment for 5768 Ninth Line

Complete Neighbourhood Guidelines Review Tool

1120 Haist Street - Pelham Arena Community Co-Design Recommendation Report Haist Street - Pelham Arena Community Co-Design Recommendation Report

NOTE: PLEASE REFER TO MISSISSAUGA PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL CITY-WIDE POLICIES WHICH APPLY TO THIS DISTRICT.

South fields. Community Architectural Design Guidelines. The Planning Partnership

150 Eighth Street Zoning By-law Amendment Application Preliminary Report

Re: 1110 Fisher Avenue Proposed Residential Development Revised Proposal File D PLANNING RATIONALE ADDENDUM

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of February 23, 2019

PLANNING RATIONALE FOR ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT MINTO COMMUNITIES INC. ARCADIA RESIDENTIAL STAGES 3 & 4 ARCADIA COMMERCIAL STAGE 2 CITY OF OTTAWA

599 Kennedy Road - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Planning Assessment Report. Southeast Corner of John Street West & Victoria Street, Niagara-on-the-Lake April, Planning & Design Inc.

*** DRAFT 2 FOR PUBLIC REVIEW ***

Uptown Rideau Street Secondary Plan [Amendment #166, January 12, 2016]

2983 NAVAN ROAD ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT

A General Summary of Land Use Zones 1

EYA Presentation to ANC 5A Committee of the Whole. The Josephite Seminary Property Washington, DC. April 13, 2016

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF 181 Burloak Drive, Oakville

Minto In Kensington Open House. Thursday March 23, pm Hillhurst Sunnyside Community Association Ave NW

30 and 44 Zorra Street - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Draft Urban Hamilton Official Plan. Amendment No. XX

Planned Development Review Revisions (Project No. PLNPCM )

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 3

Urban Design Brief. 583, 585 and 589 OXFORD STREET EAST. Salt Clinic Canada Inc.

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF NORTHVIEW FUNERAL HOME HIGHBURY AVE N, LONDON, ON

Implementation Guide Comprehensive Plan City of Allen

Bayview Avenue Official Plan Amendment, Zoning Amendment and Site Plan Control Applications Request for Direction Report

4569 Kingston Road Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Urban Design Brief Proposed Residential Development 5219 Upper Middle Road City of Burlington

Transcription:

Page 1 of 13 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This application seeks to redesignate an RC-2 (Residential Contextual One/Two Dwelling) parcel to MC-Gd72 (Multi-Residential Contextual Grade-Oriented) to allow for multi-residential development. An amendment to the Killarney/Glengarry Area Redevelopment Plan is necessary to accommodate the land use amendment proposal. PREVIOUS COUNCIL DIRECTION Council approved the Multi-Residential Infill Guidelines for Redesignations on 2014 March 31 giving Administration direction on evaluating proposals for increasing density on low-density parcels within the inner city. ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2014 November 06 That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Policy Amendment and the proposed Land Use Amendment. RECOMMENDATION(S) OF THE CALGARY PLANNING COMMISSION That Council hold a Public Hearing on Bylaws 1P2015 and 7D2015; and 1. ADOPT the proposed amendments to the Killarney/Glengarry Area Redevelopment Plan, in accordance with Administration s recommendation; and 2. Give three readings to the proposed Bylaw 1P2015. 3. ADOPT the proposed redesignation of 0.08 hectares ± (0.21 acres ±) located at 3404 Richmond Road SW (Plan 732GN, Block 1, Lots 1 and 2) from DC Direct Control District to Multi Residential Contextual Grade-Oriented (M-CGd72) District, in accordance with Administration s recommendation; and 4. Give three readings to the proposed Bylaw 7D2015.

Page 2 of 13 REASON(S) FOR RECOMMENDATION: The proposed land use district is intended to be used in proximity or directly adjacent to low density residential development and constitutes a modest density increase. The proposed land use meets several Municipal Development Plan (MDP) policies and many of the Councilapproved Guidelines for Multi-Residential redesignations. Furthermore, the subject site s location and size are able to accommodate the proposed land use. Therefore both the land use and the required policy amendment can be supported. ATTACHMENTS 1. Proposed Bylaw 1P2015 2. Proposed Bylaw 7D2015 3. Public Submissions

CALGARY PLANNING COMMISSION Page 3 of 13 LOCATION MAPS

Page 4 of 13 ADMINISTRATIONS RECOMMENDATION TO CALGARY PLANNING COMMISSION 1. Recommend that Council ADOPT, by bylaw, the proposed amendment to the Killarney/Glengarry Area Redevelopment Plan. (APPENDIX III) Moved by: P. Battistella Carried: 9 0 2. Recommend that Council ADOPT, by bylaw, the proposed redesignation of 0.08 hectares ± (0.21 acres ±) located at 3404 Richmond Road SW (Plan 732GN, Block 1, Lots 1 and 2) from DC Direct Control District to Multi-Residential Contextual Grade- Oriented (M-CGd72) District. Moved by: P. Battistella Carried: 9 0

Page 5 of 13 Applicant: Sarina Developments Landowner: Nazim Virani Planning Evaluation Content *Issue Page Density Is a density increase being proposed. Yes 5 Land Use Districts Are the changes being proposed housekeeping or simple bylaw amendment. No 5 Legislation and Policy Does the application comply with policy direction and legislation. Yes 5 Transportation Networks Do different or specific mobility considerations impact this site No 7 Utilities & Servicing Is the site in an area under current servicing review and/or has major infrastructure (water, sewer, storm and emergency response) concerns. Environmental Issues Other considerations eg. sour gas or contaminated sites No 7 No 7 Growth Management Is there growth management direction for this site. Does the recommendation create capital budget impacts or concerns. Public Engagement Were major comments received from the circulation No 7 Yes 7 *Issue - Yes, No or Resolved

Page 6 of 13 PLANNING EVALUATION SITE CONTEXT The site (22.7 metres x 36.58 metres) is located in the community of Killarney/Glengarry at the corner of Richmond Road and 33 Street SW. Other than the existing multi-residential development located to the east, the site is surrounded by low-density residential development, primarily in the form of bungalows. A bungalow and attached garage currently occupy the site. The proposal seeks a land use amendment and policy amendment to allow a modest increase in density from low-density residential (R-C2) to M-CGd72. LAND USE DISTRICTS The proposed land use district is a Multi-Residential Contextual Grade-Oriented (MC-G) district with a density modifier of 72 units per hectare, which would allow development of up to six units on site. The MC-G district is intended to accommodate multi-residential development of low height and low density in close proximity or directly adjacent to low-density residential development. Considering the surrounding low-density context, the proposed district is appropriate. LEGISLATION & POLICY Municipal Development Plan (2009 statutory) The Municipal Development Plan (MDP) identifies the subject site as Developed Residential Area Inner City on Map 1 Urban Structure. Section 2.2.5 (Strong Residential neighbourhoods) encourages redevelopment that is similar to existing scale and built form, and provides for a wider range of housing choices. This section also encourages higher densities in areas that are extensively served by existing infrastructure including transit. Relative to transit, the site is at the outer edge of a 400 metre radius from the nearest bus stops and is located along a Primary Transit Corridor. Section 3.5.2 (Inner City Areas) states that inner city areas may intensify if the intensification is consistent with the existing character of the neighbourhood. Since the proposed land use district is designed to be grade-oriented and compatible with low density residential, and since the site is located along a Primary Transit Corridor, the proposal is in general alignment with the MDP.

Page 7 of 13 Notwithstanding the above, section 1.4.4 of the MDP states that Area Redevelopment Plans in existence prior to the approval of the MDP are recognized by the MDP as providing specific direction relative to the local context. Killarney/Glengarry Area Redevelopment Plan (1986 statutory) The Killarney/Glengarry Area Redevelopment Plan identifies the site within its conservation/infill category, which provides for low density infill in the form of single-detached, semi-detached and duplex dwellings. The proposal therefore does not comply with the current wording of the ARP. An amendment to the ARP would be required. Multi-Residential Infill Guidelines (2014 non-statutory) Council approved the Location Criteria for Multi-residential Infill (APPENDIX IV) to provide specific guidance in reviewing land use amendment applications and associated amendments to local area plans. The proposal meets the following criteria: Located on a corner parcel On a collector road (Richmond Road SW is an arterial) Direct lane access Adjacent to an existing multi-residential development Within 600 metres of existing or planned Primary Transit Network (though no transit service currently exists on Richmond Road SW) Within 400 metres of a transit stop (though at the maximum extent) Overall, there is alignment with a majority of the Infill Guidelines, though certainly not all. Depending on the context, compliance with all guidelines are not required. In this case, with the increase in density being fairly modest, and considering the site characteristics, compliance with the MDP and Guidelines warrant support of change to the ARP. Proposed Amendment to the Killarney/Glengarry Area Redevelopment Plan An ARP amendment is proposed concurrently with this application. (APPENDIX III). The map amendment will convert the site to the low density townhousing category already found within the ARP, with a maximum density of 75 units per hectare. The application s proposed land use density modifier of 72 units per hectare will therefore be below the amended ARP maximum.

Page 8 of 13 TRANSPORTATION NETWORKS A Transportation Impact Assessment was not required. Sidewalks are present in the area and provide pedestrian connections to further reaches of Richmond Road SW and to 37 Street SW which are both serviced by bus routes. Vehicular access is available from the rear lane. UTILITIES & SERVICING All required services are available. At Development Permit stage, the existing 150 millimetres water service will require upgrading to 250 millimetres. ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES An Environmental Site Assessment was not required. ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY An analysis of sustainability measures to be incorporated into the development will occur at the Development Permit stage. GROWTH MANAGEMENT The proposal does not require additional capital infrastructure investment. No growth management concerns have been identified at this time. PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT Community Association Comments The Killarney/Glengarry Community Association does not support the application. (APPENDIX II) Citizen Comments Administration received a number of letters from surrounding residents. The concerns are summarized below: Increased traffic and congestion, particularly turning left onto Richmond Road SW

Page 9 of 13 Pedestrian safety Density cannot be accommodated on the subject site Increase in street parking problems Massing of the new structure Impact on urban forest Privacy issues from new structure Condition of the lane Collection of garbage and location of facilities Erosion of multigenerational nature of community Public Meetings The applicant met with representatives of the Killarney/Glengarry Community Association in July of 2014, as well as a separate meeting in the fall with adjacent residents. Residents expressed the same concerns as identified in their letters.

Page 10 of 13 APPENDIX I APPLICANT S SUBMISSION We are proposing to redesignate this property from DC28Z91 (R-2 permitted & discretionary uses with additional development guidelines regarding single-detached lot sizes and comprehensive development plan submission) to M-CG with the intention of developing a 6-unit townhome project. This is a 75 x 120 lot, with an area of 0.0836ha, providing a density of 6 with a d72 modifier. This redesignation meets the criteria of the Multi-Residential Infill Guideline. It is a corner parcel, within 400m of transit stops (including the 306 BRT and 72/73 circle routes), on a major collector, adjacent to multifamily development, and has direct lane access. It is not adjacent to, but within reasonable walking distance of numerous schools, the community hall, and green spaces including Richmond Green Park. This redesignation appeals to the opportunity for higher density townhousing close to Richmond Road up to a density of 111 units per hectare provided in the Killarney-Glengarry ARP. Sarina Homes has consulted informally with the Land Use and Planning authority with general support on the basis of the Multi-Residential Infill Guidelines. The land use plan and development concept was presented to the Killarney-Glengarry Community Association on Monday, May 26. The ARP provides Development Guidelines for multi-family development that will inform the design process and further engagement with the community association and neighboring land owners.

Page 11 of 13 APPENDIX II LETTERS SUBMITTED

Page 12 of 13 APPENDIX III PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE KILLARNEY/GLENGARRY AREA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN (a) Delete the existing Map 2 entitled Land Use Policy and insert the revised Map 2 entitled Land Use Policy as follows: Proposed Map 2: Land Use Policy

Page 13 of 13 APPENDIX IV LOCATION CRITERIA FOR MULTI-RESIDENTIAL INFILL Subject Site On a Corner Within 400m of a transit stop Within 600m of a Primary Transit stop or station On a collector or higher standard roadway on at least one frontage Adjacent to existing or planned non-residential development or multi-dwelling development Adjacent to or across from existing or planned open space or park or community centre Along or in close proximity to a corridor or activity centre Have direct lane access Comments Corner developments have fewer direct interfaces with low density development. Corner sites avoid mid-block development that could signal speculation that the entire block is appropriate for redevelopment. Allows for greater transit use, providing more mobility options for residents of multi-dwelling developments. Can reduce motor vehicle usage, thereby minimizing vehicle traffic impact on community. Allows for greater transit use, providing more mobility options for residents of multi-dwelling developments. Can reduce motor vehicle usage, thereby minimizing vehicle traffic impact on community. Minimizes traffic on local streets Creates an appropriate transition between low density and other more intensive land uses or larger scale buildings Creates an appropriate transition between low density and other land uses Creates an appropriate transition between low density and other land uses Improves pedestrian environment for local residents by limiting the creation of multiple or high frequency use driveways across local sidewalks.