Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity (Ksat), Standard Classes

Similar documents
Percent Silt. Ontario County, New York Survey Area Version and Date: 13-09/24/2016

Depth to a Selected Soil Restrictive Layer

Linear Extensibility

Depth to Any Soil Restrictive Layer

Cation-Exchange Capacity (CEC-7)

Liquid Limit. Ontario County, New York Survey Area Version and Date: 13-09/24/2016

Surface Texture. Layer Option: Surface Layer Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Tie-break Rule: Lower

Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR)

Percent Clay. Ontario County, New York Survey Area Version and Date: 13-09/24/2016

Electrical Conductivity (EC)

Drainage Class. Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Tie-break Rule: Higher. Ontario County, New York Survey Area Version and Date: 13-09/24/2016

K Factor, Whole Soil

Range Production (Unfavorable Year)

Effective Cation-Exchange Capacity (ECEC)

Farmland Classification

Hydrologic Soil Group

Potential for Seedling Mortality

Erosion Hazard (Off-Road, Off-Trail)

Soil Taxonomy Classification

Oneida County Soil Survey ID Number Name Slope/Descriptor 55A Adams Loamy Sand 0-3% slopes 55B Adams Loamy Sand 3-8% slopes 55C Adams Loamy Sand

Any County, New York. Custom Soil Resource Report for. Homer Vegetable Research Farm. United States Department of Agriculture

Custom Soil Resource Report for Tompkins County, New York

Custom Soil Resource Report for Ulster County, New York

This section describes the geologic, soil, and topographic conditions of the Nation s four properties and immediately surrounding area.


Custom Soil Resource Report for State of Connecticut

SOIL DATA: Avondale. in Allen, TX. This information was taken from NRCS web soil survey of Collin County, Texas.

Custom Soil Resource Report for State of Connecticut

2016 Area 3 Envirothon Muskingum County Soils Test ANSWER KEY

Custom Soil Resource Report for Orange County, New York, and Sussex County, New Jersey

September 20, 2016 Soils Investigation for Agricultural Designation Windemere Place, Missoula County, Montana

Custom Soil Resource Report for Craighead County, Arkansas

Custom Soil Resource Report for Columbia County, New York

NRCS Soils Report. Grand River Gathering LLC K28E Compressor Station. OA Project No

Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map

Section 1. Judging the soil pit (questions 1-4)

Custom Soil Resource Report for Orange County, Virginia

Soil types of lake county

Area 3 Envirothon Soils Questions Key

Custom Soil Resource Report for Fond du Lac County, Wisconsin

BENNING ROAD & BRIDGES TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS NRCS SOIL RESOURCE REPORT DRAFT MAY 2016

Survey of Texas Vineyard Soils

Custom Soil Resource Report for Polk County, Oregon

NRCS Soils Report. Encana Oil & Gas (USA) Inc. C19 Injection Well. OA Project No

Soils and Land Use Test

Soil characteristics that influence nitrogen and water management

Soil testing Page 1. Contrary to what is widely believed, the colour of the soil reveals very little about its fertility.

2011 Wisconsin Envirothon Soils and Land Use Exam

ASCE - Philadelphia. Soils & Stormwater Management. Matthew C. Hostrander, CPSS, SEO Soil Scientist. Gilmore & Associates, Inc.

Custom Soil Resource Report for Southampton County, Virginia

APPENDIX A SOIL RESOURCES REPORTS

EXAMPLE Point A: Sandy Loam: 65% Sand _ 20% Silt _ 15% Clay. Point B: %Sand % Silt % Clay. Point C: %Sand % Silt % Clay. Point D: %Sand % Silt % Clay

Custom Soil Resource Report for Pope County, Illinois

Custom Soil Resource Report for Pope County, Illinois

Custom Soil Resource Report for Hancock County Area, Maine

Custom Soil Resource Report for Gallia County, Ohio

SOIL SEPARATES. Soil Evaluator Day 2, Presentation 3-3/27/2018. Soil Texture, Page 1 TITLE 5 SOIL EVALUATOR CERTIFICATION TRAINING SOIL TEXTURE

Custom Soil Resource Report for Kane County, Illinois

Lesson 1: Recognizing the Characteristics of Soils and the Soil Requirements for Fruit and Nut Crops

Soils and their Relationship with Agriculture

Custom Soil Resource Report for Lane County Area, Oregon

Homework Activity Jar Test for Soil Texture

Submittal Document II.I. USDA NRCS Soil Resources Report

URBAN SOILS & SEATTLE EXAMPLES

Custom Soil Resource Report for Franklin County, Washington

Custom Soil Resource Report for Yamhill Area, Oregon

Custom Soil Resource Report for Cibola Area, New Mexico, Parts of Cibola, McKinley, and Valencia Counties

Custom Soil Resource Report for Hinds County, Mississippi

Soil Texture = %Sand, Silt & Clay in a soil.

Custom Soil Resource Report for Daviess County, Missouri

Custom Soil Resource Report for Centre County, Pennsylvania

Lesson 1: Identifying Texture in Soil

Scheduling Irrigation for Horticultural Crops. Patrick Byers Regional Horticulture Specialist Greene County

Scheduling Irrigation for Horticultural Crops

a. OVERALL PROFILE DEPTH: Assess the depth to the first restrictive layer, which can be a tree root, a rock or an

Custom Soil Resource Report for Choctaw County, Oklahoma, and McCurtain County, Oklahoma

Topoclimate Southland Soil Technical Data Sheet No Waiau

Horner-McLaughlin Woods: Soil Types

Custom Soil Resource Report for Clark County, Missouri

Custom Soil Resource Report for Alsea Area, Oregon, and Lincoln County Area, Oregon

Land Capability Classifications

RaC. RaD GlG. GlF. RaD GlE. CeA. RaE. RcD. GoF. GoF SkC. SkD. CfA. AdA. GoF. GoF. GoF. RcD. GgD. GoF. RaE GlE. RaE DbF. GoF. DbE. RaC.

TP73 4PTP101 TP45 TP9 TP74 TP46 TP47 TP115 TP48 TP32 TP5 TP31 TP22 TP49 V58 TP57 4F TP50 TP51 3PD 3PD TP80 TP28 TP55

Custom Soil Resource Report for Kent County, Maryland

Custom Soil Resource Report for Hamilton County, Texas

PHYSICAL CHAtlACTERISTICS REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED SAND AND GRAVEL SITE AT MANOR FARM, UFFINGTON

DO YOU KNOW YOUR SOILS? (Rev. 10/11)

HORT 102: Soil Properties. Cultivated Plants: Lecture 15. [Teresa Koenig] Slide #: 1 Slide Title: Intro Information Slide

List of Equipment, Tools, Supplies, and Facilities:

Custom Soil Resource Report for Payne County, Oklahoma

Lane County Land Management Division

Soil Structure, Density, and Porosity. Laboratory #4

Alternative Crop Suitability Methodology

STATEMENT OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION WITTON PARK, COUNTY DURHAM PROPOSED QUARRY EXTENSION DECEMBER 1992

AGRONOMY NOTES. Vol. 29, No. 5, 1996

Soil Science Curriculum

1 Describe the concept of soil texture and its importance. 2 Determine the texture of a soil sample.

Bell Ringer. d) Erosion e) Decomposition of organic compounds

~ NRCS. Custom Soil Resource Report for Rifle Area, Colorado, Parts of Garfield and Mesa Counties. USDA United States ~ Department of Agriculture

Geology, Soils, and Topography October 13, ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, IMPACTS, MITIGATION. 3.1 Geology, Soils, and Topography

Transcription:

name 1A Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3 70.7261 45, frequently flooded 2A Geneseo silty clay loam, 0 to 3 3.1399 90 3A Hemlock silty clay loam, 0 to 3 4.1265 90 4A Naples Creek silty clay loam, 0 to 3 5.8000 90 5A Wayland soils complex, 0 to 3, 10.0000 60 frequently flooded 12D Rockrift channery silt loam, 15 to 25 9.0000 85 13F Rock outcrop-arnot complex, 25 to 70 55 14D Cadosia channery silt loam, 15 to 25 11.9781 85 15A Guyanoga channery silt loam, fan, 0 to 3 33.5745 90 15B Guyanoga channery silt loam, fan, 3 to 8 33.5745 90 16A Almond channery silt loam, 0 to 3 3.9727 80 16B Almond channery silt loam, 3 to 8 3.9727 80 16C Almond channery silt loam, 8 to 15 3.9727 80 18A Homer fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 221.6557 90 19A Fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic, Typic Argiaquolls, 9.0000 80 0 to 3 20A Atherton and Fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic, Typic 17.8758 40 Argiaquolls, 0 to 3 24A Howard gravelly loam, 0 to 3 89.7377 80 24B Howard gravelly loam, 3 to 8 89.7377 80 24C Howard gravelly loam, 8 to 15 89.7377 80 24D Howard soils, 15 to 25 89.7377 65 25A Chenango gravelly loam, 0 to 3 62.9936 90 25B Chenango gravelly loam, 3 to 8 62.9936 90 25C Chenango gravelly loam, 8 to 15 62.9936 90 25D Chenango gravelly loam, 15 to 25 67.8689 90 25E Chenango gravelly loam, 25 to 35 67.8689 90 26B Chenango channery loam, fan, 3 to 8 59.9804 85 27B Castile gravelly silt loam, 3 to 8 64.2303 85 31A Collamer silt loam, 0 to 3 3.9103 85 31B Collamer silt loam, 3 to 8 3.9986 85 31C Collamer silt loam, 8 to 15 3.9986 85 31D Collamer silt loam, 15 to 25 3.9986 90 32A Dunkirk fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 4.1115 90 32B Dunkirk fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 4.1115 90 33A Dunkirk silt loam, 0 to 3 4.3847 90 33B Dunkirk silt loam, 3 to 8 4.3847 90 33C Dunkirk silt loam, 8 to 15 4.3847 90 33D Dunkirk silt loam, 15 to 25 4.3847 90 33E Dunkirk silt loam, 25 to 35 4.3847 90 34A Lakemont silty clay loam, 0 to 3 0.5590 85 35A Odessa silt loam, 0 to 3 1.2130 85 35B Odessa silty clay loam, 3 to 8 0.5130 85 Page 1 of 7

name 36A Schoharie silty clay loam, 0 to 3 1.9489 90 36B Schoharie silty clay loam, 3 to 8 1.9489 90 36C Schoharie silty clay loam, 8 to 15 1.9489 90 36D Schoharie silty clay loam, 15 to 25 1.9489 90 36E Schoharie silty clay loam, 25 to 45 1.9489 90 37A Schoharie silt loam, 0 to 3 2.0268 90 37B Schoharie silt loam, 3 to 8 2.0268 90 38A Niagara silt loam, 0 to 3 3.9213 85 38B Niagara silt loam, 3 to 8 3.9213 85 39A Rhinebeck silty clay loam, 0 to 3 1.5601 90 41A Aeric Epiaquepts, 0 to 3 40.9554 50 43A Canandaigua silt loam, 0 to 3 4.7273 90 44A Canandaigua mucky silt loam, 0 to 3 4.0989 90 45A Fonda mucky silt loam, 0 to 3 2.2406 95 46A Galen fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 30.9803 90 46B Galen fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 30.9803 90 48A Arkport fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 48.8571 95 48B Arkport fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 48.8571 95 48C Arkport fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 48.8571 95 48D Arkport fine sandy loam, 15 to 25 48.8571 90 49B Arkport loamy fine sand, 3 to 8 50.2808 95 49D Arkport loamy fine sand, 15 to 25 50.0739 95 49E Arkport loamy fine sand, 25 to 35 50.0739 90 49F Arkport loamy fine sand, 35 to 55 50.0739 90 50B Dunkirk-Arkport complex, 3 to 8 4.3847 50 50C Dunkirk-Arkport complex, 8 to 15 4.3847 60 50D Dunkirk-Arkport complex, 15 to 25 4.3847 60 53A Lamson fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 15.4262 90 54A Lamson mucky fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 20.8816 90 56A Elnora loamy fine sand, 0 to 3 82.5738 90 58B Colonie loamy fine sand, 3 to 8 78.0000 95 58C Colonie loamy fine sand, 8 to 15 78.0000 95 62B Mardin channery silt loam, 3 to 8 2.8590 85 62C Mardin channery silt loam, 8 to 15 2.8590 88 62D Mardin channery silt loam, 15 to 25 2.8590 85 62E Mardin channery silt loam, 25 to 35 2.8590 80 63B Langford channery silt loam, 3 to 8 3.2800 90 63C Langford channery silt loam, 8 to 15 pecent 3.2800 90 63D Langford channery silt loam, 15 to 25 3.2800 90 64B Langford-Erie channery silt loams, 3 to 8 3.2800 55 66A Lyons soils, 0 to 3 3.9200 75 68A Volusia channery silt loam, 0 to 3 2.6298 90 68B Volusia channery silt loam, 3 to 8 2.6298 90 Page 2 of 7

name 68C Volusia channery silt loam, 8 to 15 2.6298 90 68D Volusia channery silt loam, 15 to 25 2.6298 90 69A Erie channery silt loam, 0 to 3 2.5015 95 69B Erie channery silt loam, 3 to 8 2.5015 95 69C Erie channery silt loam, 8 to 15 2.5015 95 71A Darien silt loam, 0 to 3 2.9368 95 71B Darien silt loam, 3 to 8 2.9368 95 71C Darien silt loam, 8 to 15 2.9368 95 72A Darien-Ilion silt loams, 0 to 3 2.9368 68 72B Darien-Ilion silt loams, 3 to 8 2.9368 68 73B Gretor silt loam, 3 to 8 6.1398 95 73C Gretor silt loam, 8 to 15 6.1398 95 73D Gretor channery silt loam, 15 to 25 6.1398 90 76B Orpark silt loam, 3 to 8 3.9380 95 76C Orpark silt loam, 8 to 15 3.9380 95 76D Orpark channery silt loam, 15 to 25 3.9380 90 77A Chippewa silt loam, 0 to 3 2.1557 85 77B Chippewa silt loam, 3 to 8 2.1557 85 82B Manlius channery silt loam, 3 to 8 19.9052 95 82C Manlius channery silt loam, 8 to 15 19.9052 95 82D Manlius channery silt loam, 15 to 25 19.9052 95 91A Palms muck, 0 to 3 15.8858 55 92A Carlisle muck, 0 to 3 21.7000 45 93A Edwards muck, 0 to 3 6.7039 50 94A Martisco muck, 0 to 3 6.1418 55 95A Saprists, 0 to 3, inundated 21.7000 85 101A Honeoye loam, 0 to 3 5.9000 85 101B Honeoye loam, 3 to 8 5.9000 85 101C Honeoye loam, 8 to 15 5.9000 85 101D Honeoye loam, 15 to 25 5.9000 85 101E Honeoye loam, 25 to 35 5.9000 85 104A Honeoye loam, 0 to 3, lower clay 5.9000 85 surface 104B Honeoye loam, 3 to 8, lower clay 5.9000 85 surface 104C Honeoye loam, 8 to 15, lower clay 5.9000 85 surface 106B Danley-Lansing complex, 3 to 8 3.0543 50 107B Conesus-Lansing complex, 3 to 8 5.5750 50 108C Lansing loam, 8 to 15 6.3250 85 108D Lansing loam, 15 to 25 6.3250 85 108E Lansing loam, 25 to 35 6.3250 85 112B Ontario fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 5.9130 90 112C Ontario fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 5.9130 95 112D Ontario fine sandy loam, 15 to 25 5.9130 95 112E Ontario fine sandy loam, 25 to 35 5.9130 93 Page 3 of 7

name 114B Ontario gravelly loam, 3 to 8 5.9130 98 114C Ontario gravelly loam, 8 to 15 5.9130 95 114D Ontario gravelly loam, 15 to 25 5.9130 95 116B Ontario loam, 3 to 8 5.9130 90 116C Ontario loam, 8 to 15 5.9130 95 116D Ontario loam, 15 to 25 5.9130 95 118F Ontario, Honeoye, and Lansing soils, 35 to 55 5.9130 40 120E Palmyra and Howard soils, 25 to 45 89.7869 55 122A Palmyra cobbly loam, 0 to 3 86.1803 95 122B Palmyra cobbly loam, 3 to 8 86.1803 95 124A Palmyra fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 79.3421 90 124B Palmyra fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 79.3421 90 126A Palmyra gravelly loam, 0 to 3 89.7869 95 126B Palmyra gravelly loam, 3 to 8 89.7869 95 126C Palmyra gravelly loam, 8 to 15 89.7869 90 126D Palmyra gravelly loam, 15 to 25 89.7869 90 128A Palmyra gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 3 99.1639 90 128B Palmyra gravelly sandy loam, 3 to 8 99.1639 90 128C Palmyra gravelly sandy loam, 8 to 15 99.1639 90 130A Farmington loam, 0 to 3 7.2288 90 130B Farmington loam, 3 to 8 7.2288 90 132A Galoo loam, 0 to 3, rocky 4.5958 95 132B Galoo loam, 3 to 8, rocky 4.5958 95 134A Camillus silt loam, 0 to 3 11.7123 95 134B Camillus silt loam, 3 to 8 11.7123 95 151C Willdin-Norchip complex, 3 to 15 2.8590 60 152B Valois gravelly loam, 3 to 8 36.6393 85 152C Valois gravelly loam, 8 to 15 36.6393 85 152D Valois gravelly loam, 15 to 25 36.6393 85 152E Valois gravelly loam, 25 to 35 36.6393 85 153B Valois gravelly loam, cool, 3 to 8 36.9299 85 153C Valois gravelly loam, cool, 8 to 15 36.9299 85 153D Valois gravelly loam, cool, 15 to 25 36.9299 85 153E Valois gravelly loam, cool, 25 to 35 36.9299 85 162B Willdin channery silt loam, 3 to 8 2.8590 85 162C Willdin channery silt loam, 8 to 15 2.8590 85 162D Willdin channery silt loam, 15 to 25 2.8590 80 168A Ontusia channery silt loam, 0 to 3 2.4262 88 168B Ontusia channery silt loam, 3 to 8 2.4262 90 168C Ontusia channery silt loam, 8 to 15 2.4262 90 168D Ontusia channery silt loam, 15 to 25 2.4262 90 171C Lordstown-Manlius-Towerville complex, 8 to 15 171D Lordstown-Manlius-Towerville complex, 15 to 25, very stony 7.8372 40 7.8372 40 Page 4 of 7

name 171E Lordstown-Manlius-Towerville complex, 25 to 35 7.8372 40, extremely stony 171F Lordstown-Manlius-Towerville complex, 35 to 80 10.0990 40, extremely stony 177A Norchip silt loam, 0 to 3 2.1557 85 177B Norchip silt loam, 3 to 8 2.1557 85 181B Mongaup-Ischua complex, 3 to 8 7.7654 45 181C Mongaup-Ischua complex, 8 to 15 7.7654 45 181D Mongaup-Ischua complex, 15 to 25, 7.7654 45 very stony 181E Mongaup-Ischua complex, 25 to 35, 7.7654 45 extremely stony 182B Mongaup channery loam, 3 to 8 7.7952 75 182C Mongaup channery loam, 8 to 15 7.7952 75 201A Lima loam, 0 to 3 5.7500 85 201B Lima loam, 3 to 8 5.7500 85 201C Lima loam, 8 to 15 5.7500 85 204A Lima loam, 0 to 3, lower clay surface 5.7500 85 204B Lima loam, 3 to 8, lower clay surface 5.7500 85 210A Phelps gravelly silt loam, 0 to 3 43.5000 85 210B Phelps gravelly silt loam, 3 to 8 43.5000 85 212A Nuhi silt loam, 0 to 3 6.5208 85 240B Aurora-Angola silt loams, 3 to 8 2.8249 60 240C Aurora-Angola silt loams, 8 to 15 2.8249 60 240D Aurora-Angola silt loams, 15 to 25 2.8249 60 241B Aurora silt loam, 3 to 8 2.8249 85 241C Aurora silt loam, 8 to 15 2.8249 85 241D Aurora silt loam, 15 to 25 2.8249 85 255B Cazenovia silt loam, 3 to 8 2.9894 85 255C Cazenovia silt loam, 8 to 15 2.9894 85 255D Cazenovia silt loam, 15 to 25 2.9894 85 260B Cayuga silt loam, 3 to 8 2.2319 85 260C Cayuga silt loam, 8 to 15 2.2319 85 260D Cayuga silt loam, 15 to 25 2.2319 85 304A Kendaia loam, 0 to 3 6.5250 85 304B Kendaia loam, 3 to 8 6.5250 85 342A Angola silt loam, 0 to 3 3.8361 90 356A Ovid silt loam, 0 to 3 2.9321 85 356B Ovid silt loam, 3 to 8 2.9321 85 357B Ovid silty clay loam, 3 to 8 3.5176 85 357C Ovid silty clay loam, 8 to 15 3.5176 85 400A Udorthents, loamy, 0 to 3 71.2000 80 401D Udorthents, refuse substratum. 0 to 25 90 PG Pits, gravel and sand 75 PQ Pits, quarry 80 Page 5 of 7

Map name W Water Page 6 of 7

Options Attribute Name: Saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksat) refers to the ease with which pores in a saturated soil transmit water. The estimates are expressed in terms of micrometers per second. They are based on soil characteristics observed in the field, particularly structure, porosity, and texture. Saturated hydraulic conductivity is considered in the design of soil drainage systems and septic tank absorption fields. For each soil layer, this attribute is actually recorded as three separate values in the database. A low value and a high value indicate the range of this attribute for the soil component. A "representative" value indicates the expected value of this attribute for the component. For this soil property, only the representative value is used. The numeric Ksat values have been grouped according to standard Ksat class limits. The classes are: Very low: 0.00 to 0.01 Low: 0.01 to 0.1 Moderately low: 0.1 to 1.0 Moderately high: 1 to 10 High: 10 to 100 Very high: 100 to 705 Aggregation is the process by which a set of component attribute values is reduced to a single value to represent the map unit as a whole. A map unit is typically composed of one or more "components". A component is either some type of soil or some nonsoil entity, e.g., rock outcrop. The components in the map unit name represent the major soils within a map unit delineation. Minor components make up the balance of the map unit. Great differences in soil properties can occur between map unit components and within short distances. Minor components may be very different from the major components. Such differences could significantly affect use and management of the map unit. Minor components may or may not be documented in the database. The results of aggregation do not reflect the presence or absence of limitations of the components which are not listed in the database. An on-site investigation is required to identify the location of individual map unit components. For each of a map unit's components, a corresponding composition is recorded. A composition of 60 indicates that the corresponding component typically makes up approximately 60% of the map unit. Percent composition is a critical factor in some, but not all, aggregation methods. For the attribute being aggregated, the first step of the aggregation process is to derive one attribute value for each of a map unit's components. From this set of component attributes, the next step of the aggregation process derives a single value that represents the map unit as a whole. Once a single value for each map unit is derived, a thematic map for soil map units can be generated. Aggregation must be done because, on any soil map, map units are delineated but components are not. The aggregation method "Dominant Component" returns the attribute value associated with the component with the highest composition in the map unit. If more than one component shares the highest composition, the corresponding "tie-break" rule determines which value should be returned. The "tie-break" rule indicates whether the lower or higher attribute value should be returned in the case of a composition tie. The result returned by this aggregation method may or may not represent the dominant condition throughout the map unit. The tie-break rule indicates which value should be selected from a set of multiple candidate values, or which value should be selected in the event of a composition tie. This option indicates that a null value for a component should be converted to zero before aggregation occurs. This will be done only if a map unit has at least one component where this value is not null. Page 7 of 7