ALIGNMENT SEGMENTS & OPERATIONALLY INDEPENDENT SECTIONS During the Draft SEIS it was anticipated that the Preferred Alternative would be constructed in stages or operationally independent sections (OIS). An OIS is a portion of an alternative that could be built and function as a viable transportation facility even if other portions of the alternative are not advanced (FHWA, 7). The OISs are comprised of various roadway alignments and were developed by identifying sections of roadway improvements that if constructed, could function independently. Additionally, different sections within an OIS also could be replaced with another. The alignment segments that make up each Build Alternative are shown on Figure A- and summarized in Table A-. Figures A- through A-5 show each Build Alternative broken down by alignment segment. For the alignment segments that are included under two or more alternatives, Figure A- lists the letter of the corresponding alternatives with the numbered segment. The OISs are shown on Figure A-. Environmental impacts for the Build Alternatives have been quantified by roadway alignment segment and are presented in detail in Table A-. Since publication of the Draft SEIS, the CTB identified Alternative A as the Preferred Alternative for the HRCS. HRTAC set aside $.3 Billion, in year of expenditure dollars, for a Preferred Alternative in the HRTPO LRTP (HRTPO January 9, 7 Board Meeting Notes, Item #3). FHWA will only issue a ROD to complete the NEPA process for improvements that are fully funded for construction in the region s LRTP. Because the Preferred Alternative has been fully funded for construction in the region s LRTP, it is anticipated that a ROD would be issued for the entire Preferred Alternative. Alternative alignment segments the comprise the Preferred Alternative are the same as Alternative A and summarized in Table A- and shown in Figure A-. Environmental impacts for the Preferred Alternative have been quantified for the entire alternative and are presented in detail in Table A-3. Segment Table A-: Alternative Alignment Segments Roadway Segment Description Alternative A 8 I- north of HRBT 9 I- from HRBT to I-5 Alternative B 8 I- north of HRBT 9 I- from HRBT to I-5 I-5 and I-5 Connector I-5 Connector and VA Connector Interchange 3 VA Connector VA Alternative C I- from I- to and including Terminal Avenue Interchange. Proposed design 7 includes 8 lanes plus transit only lanes Terminal Avenue Interchange. Proposed interchange to connect with I- design that includes 8 lanes plus transit only lanes I- from Terminal Avenue Interchange to I- Connector. Proposed design includes 5 8 lanes plus transit only lanes APPENDIX A-
Segment Roadway Segment Description I- Connector including I- interchange. Proposed interchange to connect with I- design that includes 8 lanes plus transit only lanes I- from I- Connector to VA 3 I- and VA Interchange I- from VA to US 58 (Bowers Hill) I- from US 58 (Bowers Hill) to I- 3 VA Connector I-5 Connector, I- Connector, and VA Connector Interchange. Proposed interchange to connect with I-5 design that includes lanes plus transit only lanes I-5 and I-5 Connector. Proposed design includes 8 lanes plus transit only lanes Alternative D 8 I- north of HRBT 9 I- from HRBT to I-5 I- from I- to and including Terminal Avenue Interchange. Proposed design 7 includes 8 lanes Terminal Avenue Interchange. Proposed interchange to connect with I- design that includes 8 lanes I- from Terminal Avenue Interchange to I- Connector. Proposed design includes 5 8 lanes I- Connector including I- interchange. Proposed interchange to connect with I- design that includes 8 lanes I- from I- Connector to VA 3 I- and VA Interchange I- from VA to US 58 (Bowers Hill) I- from US 58 (Bowers Hill) to I- VA 3 VA Connector I-5 Connector, I- Connector, and VA Connector Interchange. Proposed interchange to connect with I-5 design that includes lanes I-5 and I-5 Connector. Proposed design includes 8 lanes APPENDIX A-
Figure A-: Alignment Segments APPENDIX A-3
Figure A-: Alternative A Segments APPENDIX A-
Figure A-3: Alternative B Segments APPENDIX A-5
Figure A-: Alternative C Segments APPENDIX A-
Figure A-5: Alternative D Segments APPENDIX A-7
Figure A-: Operationally Independent Sections APPENDIX A-8
Segment Segment Segment 3 Segment Segment 5C Segment 5D Segment C Segment D Segment 7C Segment 7D Segment 8 Segment 9 Segment BD Segment C Segment C Segment D Segment B Segment C Segment D Segment 3 Segment Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Table A-: Environmental Impacts by Segment Resource Right-of-Way (# / acres) Residential Commercial 8 (.9) (<.) (<.) Industrial Institutional (.7) (.) 8 (3.) 3 (.) (.) 5 (.) (.7) 9 (.) 3 (.3) (<.) (<.) (.3) 3 (.) (.) Military Open Space 5 (.9) 7 (.) (.) (.9) (5.8) (.) (.7) Other (.3) (.7) 7 (3.3) (.7) 7 (.) 7 (.8) (<.) 75 (8.9) 9 (.3) (.8) (5.) (5.7) (3.7) (<.) (.8) (.) (.) 8 (.9) 3 (.) (.7) (7.5) 3 (.5) (.) (.9) (.9) (.) (.9) 7 (.) 7 (5.) 8 (89.) (.7) (7.5) (7.5) (8.5) (3.9) (.) (.3) (.) (.) (.3) (.7) (.7) (7.5) (7.5) 3 (7.) 5 (.) (.) 7 (5.) (3.8) (.7) (.5) (.) Potential Residential Displacements 9 Potential Commercial Displacements 3 Potential Other* Displacements 3 Military Facilities (#/acres) 3 (.) (.7) (.5) (.7) (7.5) (7.5) (9.) Community Facilities 3 Park & Recreation Place of Worship Cemetery School / University Land Use*.9 3..7..8...8. 9.. 5.. 79..7 7.5 7.5.8 Residential...5..5. Commercial.3 3. 3..5.. Industrial...8. 5.9.8. 5..7. 5. 5.3 Institutional. 5.9 5.7.9.9.7 7.5 7.5 3.8 Military.8.8 8..7 Open Space.9.3.7.9.9 3.7...3.3.5 Section (f) Properties (# / acres) (7.) (5.) (33.8) (.3) (.) 3 (.) 3 (.5) (.8) (3.) (8.7) (98.3) (5.7) (3.5) (5.) (9.8) (.) (.7) APPENDIX A-9
$53.M $95.M $3.M $3.M $3.9B $.5B $35.M $8.M $5.M $3.8M $.M $3.B $.B $.5B $.5B $.B $9.M $577.M $5,.3M $7.7M $9,.5M Segment Segment Segment 3 Segment Segment 5C Segment 5D Segment C Segment D Segment 7C Segment 7D Segment 8 Segment 9 Segment BD Segment C Segment C Segment D Segment B Segment C Segment D Segment 3 Segment Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Resource Farmland Stream Impacts (linear feet) 9.7 3.. Navigable Waters (acres)..7 97. 97.... 7.3. 53.9.8 95.7.5 7.3 5. 3. Wetlands (acres) 3. 5.8.8 7.8 5.7 5.3. 7...9. 3. Resource Protection Areas (acres) 7.8 3. 7.3.8 5...3.3 5. Floodplains (acres) 3.5. 3. 5. 5..5.. 3.3 9.3 5. 3. 3.5 38.7.3 3.8 3..9 Hampton Roads Aquatic Habitat (acres) 7. 9. 7.8.5. 55.7 5.5 57.8 5.7 3.5 3.7 79.9 7.. Benthic Communities 5. 8. 9. 5. 5.. Essential Fish Habitat, Habitat Areas of Particular Concern, and Anadromous Fish Use. 7.7..9.7 38. 5. 57. 5.7 3.5 3.5 79.7 73.9 Areas (acres) Threatened & Endangered Species Habitat (acres)... 3.5..... 3...3 7. 7..7 Submerged Aquatic Vegetation (acres).8 Terrestrial Habitat (Forested Area) (acres) 5..3. 3. 8. 7.3.9 7. 3. 5. Water Quality Short-term and minor, beneficial long-term impacts Historic Architecture Resources 3 3 Archaeology Resources 8 3 Visual Impacts Energy Requirements and Conservation Potential Minor to moderate impacts Minor energy requirements Total Cost Notes: Right-of-Way data was gathered from each of the localities. Land use data was gathered from HRTPO. *Other includes Military, Institutional, and Industrial zoning classifications. APPENDIX A-
Table A-3: Preferred Alternative Environmental Impacts Resource Preferred Alternative Right-of-Way (# / acres) Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Military Open Space Other 78 (7.3) 3 (.5) (.) (.9) (.) (.) (.) 3 (3.) Potential Residential Displacements 9 Potential Commercial Displacements Potential Other* Displacements Military Facilities (#/acres) Community Facilities Park & Recreation Place of Worship Cemetery School / University Land Use 3.3 Residential.5 Commercial <. Industrial.7 Institutional. Military Open Space.9 Section (f) Properties (# / acres) (. and 37.) Farmland Stream Impacts (linear feet) Navigable Waters (acres) 75.9 Wetlands (acres) 7. APPENDIX A-
Resource Preferred Alternative Resource Protection Areas (acres).9 Floodplains (acres) 9. Hampton Roads Aquatic Habitat (acres) 7. Benthic Communities 5.5 Essential Fish Habitat, Habitat Areas of Particular Concern, and Anadromous Fish Use Areas (acres) 57.7 Threatened & Endangered Species Habitat (acres). Submerged Aquatic Vegetation (acres). Terrestrial Habitat (Forested Area) (acres).9 Water Quality Short-term and minor, beneficial long-term impacts Historic Architecture Resources 3 Archaeology Resources 5 Visual Impacts Energy Requirements and Conservation Potential Minor to moderate impacts Minor energy requirements Total Cost $3.3B Notes: Right-of-Way data was gathered from each of the localities. Land use data was gathered from HRTPO. *Other includes Institutional and Industrial classifications. APPENDIX A-