Griffin Garage SPECIAL EXCEPTION Petition #PLNBOA Oneida Street Administrative Hearing September 23 rd, 2010

Similar documents
Kingfisher Planned Development (PLNSUB ) and Special Exception (PLNPCM ) Planned Development and Special Exception

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Legislative Item

PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN. APPLICANT: Cedar Grove Hospitality, LLC HEARING DATE: December 18, 2014

CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT DESIGN REVIEW BOARD IBOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Coast Highway APN

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

Chair Leskinen and Planning Commission Members Jessica Loftus, City Administrator

PLNPCM Carl s Jr. Commercial Parking Lot at Redwood Road and 1700 South

Staff Report. Conditional Use PLANNING DIVISION COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. Salt Lake City Planning Commission

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. Front Yard Terracing PLNHLC South 1200 East Meeting Date: August 7, 2014

Administrative Hearing Staff Report

Planned Development Review Revisions (Project No. PLNPCM )

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING JEFFERSON PARISH, LOUISIANA

RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the proposed Master Plan for Villa Esperanza (VE), located at 2116

Jay Reinert Architect, LLC

Infill Residential Design Guidelines

Urban Planning and Land Use

DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Staff Report

Staff Report CONDITIONAL USE

NEW HOMES IN ANCASTER S MATURE NEIGHBOURHOODS WHAT WE HAVE HEARD

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING JEFFERSON PARISH, LOUISIANA

PRELIMINARY CONDITIONAL USE SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST REQUIREMENTS

Planning Commission Staff Report

(APN: );

AMEND DMENT H HOSPITAL

Design Review Commission Report

Planning Commission. DATE: February 9, 2017

David J. Gellner, AICP, Principal Planner, , PLNSUB Harmons Brickyard Fuel Center Planned Development

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ MEMORANDUM. To: Don Bussey, Zoning Administrator From: Lawrence Kasparowitz, Project Planner

PETITION NUMBER(S): V10-002

ARTICLE V PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

CITY OF GARDEN CITY. Garden City Design Review Committee Staff Contact: Chris Samples STAFF REPORT: DSRFY Page 1

WHEREAS, after consideration of the evidence presented at the public hearing on September 11, 2008, the Prince George's County Planning Board finds:

ARTICLE IX SPECIAL PERMIT USES

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING JEFFERSON PARISH, LOUISIANA

Historic District Commission Staff Report September 7 th 2016

Mayor Leon Skip Beeler and Members of the City Commission. Anthony Caravella, AICP, Director of Development Services

14825 Fruitvale Ave.

PC RESOLUTION NO

Chapter OVERLAY DISTRICTS

Planning Commission Report

6 July 9, 2014 Public Hearing

July 6 th, Re: The Sugarmont Apartments Planned Development. Dear John,

The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Prince George's County Planning Department Development Review Division

Nick Sigmund, Sr. Zoning Officer

CHESAPEAKE LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY

COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES MANUAL

MEMORANDUM. Planning and Zoning Division Department of Community Development TO: FROM: DATE: July 23, SUBJECT: PLNSUB : Salt City Plaza

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT APRIL 7, 2016

ATTACHMENT 2. Planning Commission Resolution with Clean Copy of Ordinance

Historic District Commission

AD ELA. LOCATION: Lunar Dr. REAL ESTATE NUMBER: ;

Utah Valley University Board of Trustees Meeting September 7, :00am Tab Agenda Notes

Christopher M. Price, AICP Director of Planning February 7, 2014 STAFF REPORT

4.1 LAND USE AND HOUSING

City Council Special Meeting AGENDA ITEM NO. C.

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT

8 & 10 Donalda Crescent Official Plan & Rezoning Application Final Report

LANDSCAPING. Design. Development of the site shall not unreasonably impair the ability of adjoining properties to utilize solar energy.


General Location Courtyard at LMH Final Development Plan and Final Plat

STAFF REPORT. Douglas N Mclsaac Community Development Department3K 1. single family residential properties

5.4 Development Incentives for All Commercial and Industrial Districts (except the TC: Town Center District).

EXPEDITED MONTGOMERY COUNTY HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. Address: 4709 Dorset Ave., Chevy Chase Meeting Date: 7/25/2018

ZONING AMENDMENT & PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT Date: April 4, 2013

Attachment 4. TRPA Environmental Documentation, IEC/MFONSE

Fact Sheet Regulating Oceanfront Accessory Structures Updated June 10, 2013

Request Alternative Compliance to the prescribed criteria of the Oceanfront Resort District Form-Based Code. Staff Planner Kristine Gay

Design Review Application *Please call prior to submittal meeting to determine applicable fees*

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

ATTACHMENT 3 ZAB Page 1 of 8

Planning Division Department of Community & Economic Development. Applicant: Wade Olsen. Staff: Casey Stewart

McDonald s Restaurant - Purcellville Town of Purcellville Special Use Permit Statement of Justification July 24, 2014

SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE TO DESIGNATE A LANDMARK DISTRICT OVERLAY FOR THE CRAWFORDS VISTA LANDMARK DISTRICT

RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES

Highway Oriented Commercial Development Criteria

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT S. Apartments Planned Development PLNSUB Planned Development 247 West 1400 South March 12, 2014

Deputy Director: Alice McCurdy Staff Report Date: June 8, 2012

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

D3 January 14, 2015 Public Hearing

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

City of Lafayette Study Session Staff Report Design Review Commission

Architectural and Appearance Design Manual. Town of Lexington, SC 1

AD STANDARDS, CRITERIA AND FINDINGS

PLANNING APPROVAL & PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Date: November 2, 2017

(Ord. No. 743, )

S 2024 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

Residential Design Guidelines

RESIDENTIAL GUIDELINES CHECKLIST

GENERAL INFORMATIONaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

Historic District Commission

R E S O L U T I O N. B. Development Data Summary:

R E S O L U T I O N. Single-Family Residence/ Church. 2,488 sq. ft. 2,488 sq. ft. Area Parking Required: Church

PLANNING IN ARLINGTON. Briefing to Katie Cristol

4 January 11, 2012 Public Hearing APPLICANT:

Deb Grube, Sr. Zoning Officer

DEPARTURE FROM DESIGN STANDARDS DDS-586

BOARD~ ADJUSTMENTIDESIGN RE ~WBOARD PROJECT OVERVIEW

TITLE 17 TOWN OF BRIDGEWATER PROPERTY BOUNDARIES AND PLANTINGS

Transcription:

ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING STAFF REPORT Griffin Garage SPECIAL EXCEPTION Petition #PLNBOA2010-005 1099 Oneida Street Administrative Hearing September 23 rd, 2010 Planning and Zoning Division Department of Community & Economic Development Applicant: Jerry Griffin Tax ID: 16-15-309-008 Current Zone: R-1/7000 Single Family Res. Council District: District 6 JT Martin Lot size: 15,700 Sq. Feet Current Use: Single Family Res. Request The applicant requests a special exception for the rebuilding of a garage and keeping it in non-compliance with Sections 21A.40.050 A.3, which states that any accessory structure must be within 5 feet of the property line. Staff Recommendation Based on the analysis and findings noted in the following pages it is staff s opinion that the Griffin garage Special Exception request (PLNBOA2010-00555) meets the applicable special exception standards and therefore should be approved by the Hearing Officer. Applicable Land Use Regulations: 21A.24.060 R-1/7000 District Section 21A.40.050.A Location of Accessory Buildings in Required Yards 21A.52 Special Exceptions Attachments: A. Application B. Site/Building drawings PLNBOA2010-00414 Bowles Shed Special Exception Published Date: 8/19/2010 1

Vicinity Map 1754 Oneida Street Project Information Request The applicant requests a special exception to relocate non-compliant garage. Accessory buildings in the R-1 zoning districts are required to be setback five feet or less from the rear lot line (Sections 21A.40.050 A.3). The applicant requests approval for a distance of approximately 28 feet from the rear lot line in order to preserve a mature tree. The accessory building would be used for storage of a car as well as for the use of a covered patio. Project Details Regulation Zone Regulation Current Development Requested Development Complies? Rear Yard Setback 5 feet maximum 38 ft 28 ft No Background The owner of the property has a non-compliant garage that the homeowner would like to rebuild as a two-car garage as well as a covered patio.. Under R-1/7000 zoning, accessory buildings have to be a maximum of 5 feet from the rear property line (Section 21A.40.050 A. 3d (3)). The existing shed is in violation, being almost 40 feet from the back property line. The new location for the two-car garage/covered patio is 28 feet 1 inch from the rear property line. The owner requests special exception to preserve mature vegetation, a tree, which is located approximately 28 feet from the rear property line. The Board of Adjustment may consider such a request in the case of mature vegetation. (Section 21A.40.050 A.3.d (3)) The garage meets all other regulations. PLNBOA2010-00414 Bowles Shed Special Exception Published Date: 8/19/2010 2

Comments Public Comments No public comments were received prior to this report. Analysis and Findings 21A.52.060 General Standards and Considerations for Special Exceptions: A. Compliance with Ordinance and District Purposes: The proposed use and development will be in harmony with the general and specific purposes for which this title was enacted and for which the regulations of the district were established. Analysis: The subject property is located in the R-1/7000 zoning district, which requires accessory buildings be located in the rear yard, with the accessory building setback being no more than five feet from the rear lot line. The purpose of the five foot maximum setback ordinance is to keep the location of accessory buildings subordinate in location to the principal building. The proposed location is necessary due to a mature tree (vegetation) that is located 28 feet from the rear property line. A 28 foot setback will preserve the tree and its surrounding root system, which is supported by City Code with regard to environmental pollution (see General Standard F listed below.) Allowing the setback of 28 feet rather than five feet would still be in harmony with the general purposes of the ordinance as the shed would still be subordinate to the principal structure. B. No Substantial Impairment of Property Value: The proposed use and development will not substantially diminish or impair the value of the property within the neighborhood in which it is located. Analysis: The accessory use of storage is one that is typically found in residential neighborhoods. Therefore, the proposed use and development would not likely diminish or impair the value of the property within the neighborhood. C. No Undue Adverse Impact: The proposed use and development will not have a material adverse effect upon the character of the area or the public health, safety and general welfare. Analysis: Locating the garage 28 feet from the rear set back would still maintain its subordinate nature to the principal building, especially given the low 13 foot height of the structure. Staff does not anticipate any undue adverse impact on the character of the area or public health, safety, and general welfare. D. Compatible with Surrounding Development: The proposed special exception will be constructed, arranged and operated so as to be compatible with the use and development of neighboring property in accordance with the applicable district regulations. Analysis: Given the current yard layout, construction of the garage in an alternate location not proposed by the applicant would be difficult due to the location of the tree. It however would be possible to move the garage further to the southwest, but it would be difficult to do so because of the location of the driveway. If this alternate location is not considered, then the proposed garage will be located as close to the rear lot line as practically possible without damaging mature vegetation and is considered compatible with the residential uses of neighboring properties. PLNBOA2010-00414 Bowles Shed Special Exception Published Date: 8/19/2010 3

E. No Destruction of Significant Features: The proposed use and development will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of natural, scenic or historic features of significant importance. Analysis: No natural, scenic or historic features of significant importance are known to be on or adjacent to this proposed shed. F. Material Pollution of Environment: The proposed use and development will not cause material air, water, soil or noise pollution or other types of pollution. Analysis: Special exceptions are considered for the preservation of mature vegetation (Section 21A.40.050 A.3.d (3). A special exception for the shed will protect the existing mature tree and its root system that is located in the lot. The proposed shed will thereby not cause any air, water, soil or noise pollution. G. Compliance with Any Additional Standards: The proposed use and development comply with all additional standards imposed on it pursuant to section 21A.52.100 of this chapter. Analysis: Additional standards are not imposed by section 21A.52.100 for accessory buildings that are located more than five feet from a rear lot line. PLNBOA2010-00414 Bowles Shed Special Exception Published Date: 8/19/2010 4

Attachment A Application

Attachment B Site Plan and Building Drawings